Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Introduction
topic.
information
about reading towards the study. One of the main reasons why
academic performance
2012).
television, both the young and the old found enough time to
literature.
vocabulary knowledge.
Theoretical Framework
shared.
The more your child reads, the more new words will find
normal speech. “When you read aloud to your child, you are
(https://www.academia.edu/31368455)
Conceptual Framework
Household
environment
Attitude
Reaing habits School
towards
environment
reading
are being taught by the same teacher and under the same
different tasks. The reasons they give has been grouped into
reinforcements.
from high school indicated that they will never read another
book
olds leisure reading was lower than it was about two decades
percent from age nine to age 17, with only 22 percent of 17-
machines and
spent
1.1 Strand
1.2 Section
1.3 Age
1.4 Gender
Source iCollege?
Null Hypothesis
Source iCollege
persons or entity:
there are good and bad effects. They didn’t know how this
the teachers also to give them ideas and what are the causes
of
Performance.
information.
Chapter 2
of reading
habit, which is among the individual and social development
(2012)
tertiary education
students and how these practices affect their academic
achievement.
2012)
genres the most, and they could not spare much time for
Research Method
iCollege.
Research Design
through
over time.
Research Respondents
Research Locale
Research Instrument
scenario.
f
Formula:P = x 100
n
F = Frequency
P = Percentage (%)
2. Weighted Mean
Where:
∑: Summation
X: Score
Chapter 4
Table 1
age of 17 years old with the percentage of 37% the third one
0%
Table 2
Gender
frequency are female with the percentage of 55% and only 45%
for male.
According to Ladipo (2015) Exploring gender differences
Table 3
their Strand
Table 4
their Section
10 or 16.67%.
Survey Analysis
Table 5
Interpretation
Strongly Agree 43 71.66%
Agree 9 15%
Neutral 3 5%
Disagree 1 1.66%
Strongly Disgaree 4 6.66%
Total 60 99.98%
Table 6
students.
Interpretation
Strongly Agree 30 50%
Agree 19 31.66%
Neutral 7 11.66%
Disagree 2 3.33%
Strongly 2 3.33%
Disagree
Total 60 99.98%
interpretation
Strongly Agree 37 61.66%
Agree 13 21.66%
Neutral 6 10%
Disagree 2 3.33%
Strongly 2 3.33%
Disagree
Total 60 99.98%
same frequency 2 or 3%
Table 8
Disagree
Total 60 99.98%
of 2 or 3%
Table 9
reading.
interpretation
Strongly agree 28 46.66%
Agree 20 33.33%
Neutral 6 10%
Disagree 4 6.66%
Strongly 2 3.33%
Disagree
Total 60 99.98%
Table 10
interpretation
Strongly agree 22 36.66%
Agree 17 28.33%
Neutral 14 23.33%
Disagree 6 10%
Strongly 1 1.66%
Disagree
Total 60 99.98%
Table 10 shows that the most answer of the respondents
are strongly agree which means the conclusion that there was
verbal interpretation.
Table 11
Interpretation
Strongly agree 50 83.33%
Agree 4 6.66%
Neutral 2 3.33%
Disagree 2 3.33%
Strongly 2 3.33%
Disagree
Total 60 99.98%
of 3% or 2 out of 60 respondents.
Table 12
Interpretation
Strongly agree 37 61.66%
Agree 14 23.33%
Neutral 5 8.33%
Disagree 2 3.33%
Strongly Disagree 2 3.33%
Total 60 99.98%
interpretation.
Table 13
interpretation
Strongly agree 23 38.33%
Agree 8 13.33%
Neutral 16 26.66%
Disagree 9 15%
Strongly disagree 4 6.66%
Total 60 99.98%
Table 14
of 60 total respondents.
Table 15
Presentation of Chi-Square
Table 16
Degree 0.99 0.95 0.90 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.10 0.05 0.01
of
Freedom
1 0.000 0.004 0.016 0.102 0.455 1.32 2.71 3.84 6.63
Table 17
Summarization of Data
‘rejected’
Chapter 5
Summary
academic performance
Conclusion
It is stated in the null hypothesis is rejected.
the
Recommendation
eyesight.
to read fluently.
4. For the students, whatever problem that you encountered
Bibliography
Palani, K. K. "Promoting reading habits and
creating literate society." Researchers World 3.2
(2012): 90.