Mol 2003
Mol 2003
J. C. MOL
Institute ofMolecular Chemistry, Faculty ofScience,
Universiteit van Amsterdam,
Nieuwe Achtergracht 166,1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
E-mail:j [email protected].
1. Introduction
Propene is obtained mainly from naphtha steam crackers (globally about 65%) as a
coproduct with ethene, and from fluid catalytic cracking (FCC). Relatively
units small
amounts are produced by propane dehydrogenation and by coal gasification via
Fischer-Tropsch chemistry
. Strong global demand for propene, however, presently
outpaces supply from these conventional sources.
(1)
313
Y.lmamoglu and L Bencze (eds.), Novel Metathesis Chemistry: Well-Defined Initiator Systems/or Specialty
Chemical Synthesis, Tailored Polymers and Advanced Material Applica tions, 313-322.
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
314
o Feed
Purge
C. Recycle
Purge
Feed
Guard Metathesis Ethene Propene
Bed Reactor Column Column
metathesis reactor. The reaction takes place in a fixed-bed reactor over aof mixture
WOiSiO z (the metathesis catalyst) and MgO (an isomerization catalyst) >260°C
at and
30-35 bar [2]. 1-Butene in the feedstocks isomerizedto
i 2-butene sa the original
2-buteneis consumed in the metathes is reaction. The conversion of butene is above
60% per pass and the selectivity for propene>90%. is The reactor is regenerated on a
regular basis [3]
.
At the end of 1985 Lyondell Petro chemicalCo. started to operate a 136,000 t/yr (tons
per year) OCT plant in Channelview, Texas (USA) for the productionof
polymerizat ion-gradepropenevia cross-met athesisbetween ethene and 2-butene . In
their process, part of the etheneromf cracking units is dimerized to 2-butene , using a
homogeneous nickel catalystdeveloped by Phillips, which reacts with the rest of the
ethene to produce propene [4]. The process has been retrofitted company'ssteam
to the
cracker in Channelview [5].
In particular, naphtha steam crackers with an integrated metathesi s unit are an
interesting alternative for producing more propene. In December , 2001 BASF Fina
Petrochemicals (a 60 -40 joint venture between BASF and Atofina) brought on stream a
world-scale steam cracker plant in Port Arthur , Texas (USA), which will integrate the
OCT process to enhance the production of propene in relation to .ethene This plant
produces 920,000 t/yr of ethene and 550,000 t/yr of propene , but when the metathe sis
unit is added (at the endof2003),it will adjust the output to 830,000t/yr of ethene and
860,000 t/yr of propene [6]. Raw Cz and C4 feedstocks are supplied directly by the
steam cracker, but additional 4'sCwill be taken from the Sabena Chemicals'C 4 splitter
being planned by a joint venture of Shell Chemicals, BASF and Atofina; by-products
are recycled to the cracker.
Mitsui Chemicals will install the OCT technology to increase the propene capacity at
it's olefins plant at its Osaka works in Japan by ,000140 t/yr to 420,000 t/yr.
315
Completion of the project is expected in August 2004 [7]. The OCT process will also
be used at Shanghai Secco Petrochemical, a joint venture of BP Chemical, Sinopec and
Shanghai Petrochemical Corporation, which is building a 900,000 t/yr naphtha cracker
integrated with an OCT unit to produce a total of,000t/yr
590 of propene at Caojing,
China. The complex is scheduled for start-up in the first
half of 2005 [8]. PCS
(Petrochemical Corp
. of Singapore), a joint venture between Shell Chemicals and
Sumitomo Chemical, is studying an increase in propene capacity at its olefin units by
200,000-300,000t/yr using the OCT technology [9]
.
A semi-works unit using the OCT process for butene metathesis to produce
-hexeneis
l
under construction at
Sinopec'sethene plant in Tianjin, and will be started up in early
2003 [12].
2.3.PRODUCTION OF NEOHEXENE
o Eth
Ethene Isobutene
recycle
DIB
recycle
+ (2)
(n + 2) CH 2=CH 2 (3)
n = 0 - 36
The oletins formed are immiscible with the solvent; product and catalyst phases are
thereby readily separated so that the Ni catalyst can be recycled repeatedly
. The C6-C 18
l-alkenesare separated from the product ixtureby
m distillation. This fraction can be
further fractionated into individual compounds, which can be used as comonomer in
polyethene production or converted into products such as synthetic lubricants,
plasticizer alcohols, detergent alcohols, synthetic fatty acids
. Theetc
remaining lighter
«C 6) and heavier >C
( 1S) alkenes go to puritication beds
, which remove catalyst and
solvent residues that would otherwise deactivate the isomerization catalyst.
In the second step, these lighte r and heavier alkenes undergo double-bond
isomerization over a solid potassium metal catalyst to an equilibrium mixture of
internal alkenes; equation .(4)
R-CH=CH2 ~ R1-CH=CH-R2 (4)
3.1.POLYOCTENAMER
M=CHR r-.
M CHR HC=CH
+ 11 11
H .. MTtytCHR (6a)
HC=CH HU
~
The product has a purity of99.5%. The cis to trans ratio, whichdeterminesthe degree
of crystallinity,is controlled by thepolymerizationconditions. The trans double bond
contentof Vestenamer " 8012 is 80%, thecrystallinity30%, and themolecularweight
75000. Used as a blending material, it offerspossibilitiesfor the improvementof
propertiesof rubbercompoundsand for use inrubberizedcement. Anadditionaltype,
Vestenamer " 6213, with a lowertrans content (60%) and, therefore, lower crystallinity
(10%) , has been developedto provide for low-temperatureapplicationswhere the
admixtureofthestandardtype would lead to exce ssive stiffening[18].
37°C; eq. (7). The process uses a RuCI3 catalyst in butanol, operates in air, and
produces a useful elastomer, to be used for oil spill recovery, as a sound barrier, or for
damping.
ndJ ROMP
RuCl3 / butanol
.. ~n (7)
3.3. POLYDICYCLOPENTADIENE
a
•
Equation (8)
ROMP
.. .. n
(9)
321
n m
(2)
4. Conclusions
5. References
I. Ivin, KJ. and Mol, J.C, (1997) Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis Polymerization, Academic Press,
London, Chapter17.
2. Parkinson, G. (2001) Chemical Engineering. 108 (8) August, p. 27.
3. Kantorowicz, S.l. (2002) C4 Processing Options to Upgrade Steam Cracker and FCC Streams,
Lecture
presentedat the 2nd A sian PetrochemicalsT echnologyConference,7-8 May, Seoul, Korea.
4. Chemical Week (1985), 20 November, p. 54.
5. Scott,A. (1999) Chemical Week, 3 November, p.41.
6. European Chemical News (2002), 25 March, p. 20.
7. Chemical Week (2002), 16 October,p. 16.
8. Wood, A. (2002) Chemical Week, 27 February, p. 40; News Release, ABB Lummus Global, 15
April, 2002.
9. N. Alperowicz (2002)Chemical Week, 6 M arch,p. 16.
10. Amigues,P., Chauvin, Y .,Commereuc, D .,Lai, C .C., Liu, Y .H.and Pan,l. M. (1990) Hydrocarbon
Process., 69, October, p. 79;
11 Cosyns, J., Chodorge, J., Commereuc,D . and Torck, B. (1998) Hydrocarbon Process., 77, March,
p.61.
12. Wood, A .(2002) Chemical Week, 13 February, p. 32.
13. Banks, R.L.,B anasiak,D .S., Hudson, P.S. and Norell, J.R. (1982) J. Mol. Catal. 15,21.
14. Freitas, E.R. and Gum, C.R. (1979) Chem. Eng. Progr. 75 (I), 73.
15. Sherwood, M . (1982) Chem. Ind. (London), 994.
16. Shell Chemicals Information Handbook (2002). Shell Chemicals Limited .
322