Scribd
Upload
39 views

Work Immersion Evaluation Form

The document is a seminar evaluation form from Maryhill College that asks participants to provide feedback on various aspects of a work immersion presentation. It requests ratings of different indicators of the presentation's goals, organization, and presenters. It also asks for ratings of the overall quality of materials, audio-visual setup, substance of the seminar, and satisfaction. Finally, it prompts listing strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions to help improve future presentations.

Uploaded by

YANNA CABANGON
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views

Work Immersion Evaluation Form

The document is a seminar evaluation form from Maryhill College that asks participants to provide feedback on various aspects of a work immersion presentation. It requests ratings of different indicators of the presentation's goals, organization, and presenters. It also asks for ratings of the overall quality of materials, audio-visual setup, substance of the seminar, and satisfaction. Finally, it prompts listing strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions to help improve future presentations.

Uploaded by

YANNA CABANGON
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Maryhill College, Inc.

Lucena City

Work Immersion
Seminar Evaluation Form
Please provide us with your feedback by completing this questionnaire. This is a vital tool in our
organization as it helps us to continuously improve our services to you our valued clients. We
hope that you will be very candid in your responses as this will translate into accurate data and
analyses towards better service.
Directions: Please put a check (/) mark in the box that corresponds to your evaluation.
Part I. PRESENTATION

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The goals of the presentation were clear.
2. The style of the presentation was organized
3. The organizers were well prepared.
4. The presentation was engaging & dynamic.
5. The presenters were easy to interact with.

Part II. OVERALL QUALITY


1. Quality of the seminar materials  Poor  Fair  Good  Excellent
2. Audio-Visual Setup  Poor  Fair  Good  Excellent
3. Substantiality of the seminar.  Poor  Fair  Good  Excellent
4. Overall Satisfaction of seminar.  Poor  Fair  Good  Excellent

Part III. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

Please list 2 specific things you enjoyed MOST and learned from this presentation.

1. ___________________________________________________________________________________

2. ___________________________________________________________________________________

Please list 2 specific things you enjoyed LEAST about this presentation.

1. ___________________________________________________________________________________

2. ___________________________________________________________________________________

List any suggestions you have for improving this presentation.


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Prepared by: Mr. Matt Wilson M. Quisao, LPT


Junior Teacher II

You might also like