Calculating Total Cooling Requirements
Calculating Total Cooling Requirements
Transcript
Slide 1: Calculating Total Cooling Requirements
Welcome to the Data Center University™ course: Calculating Total Cooling Requirements.
Slide 2: Welcome
For best viewing results, we recommend that you maximize your browser window now. The screen controls allow you to
navigate through the eLearning experience. Using your browser controls may disrupt the normal play of the course.
Click the Notes tab to read a transcript of the narration.
Slide 4: Introduction
All electrical equipment produces heat, which must be removed to prevent the equipment temperature from rising to an
unacceptable level. Most Information Technology equipment and other equipment found in a data center or network
room is air-cooled. Sizing a cooling system requires an understanding of the amount of heat produced by the
equipment contained in the enclosed space, along with the heat produced by the other heat sources typically
encountered.
To begin this process, data center managers must first identify how the heat output rate is measured. This is often
handled in different ways, so let’s discuss those ways now.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
terms. The term “Tons” refers to the cooling capacity of ice and is a relic of the period from 1870-1930 when
refrigeration and air conditioning capacity were provided by the daily delivery of ice blocks. Other parts of the world
have also been known to use the various specifications such as Joules or Calories, in addition to BTUs and Tons.
As a result, there is a worldwide trend to phase out the archaic terms of BTU and Tons over time, and for that reason,
this course will discuss cooling and power capacities in Watts. The use of the Watt as the common standard is
fortuitous, as data center power, is already measured in Watts, so using Watts as a standard measure simplifies the
work associated with data center design. Now that we’ve discussed the benefits of standardization, let’s move on to
exploring heat conversion factors.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
Slide 9: Heat Conversion Factors
The one exception to this rule is the Power over Ethernet (PoE) switches; in these devices up to 30% of the power
consumed by the device may be transmitted to remote terminals, so their heat load may be lower than the electrical
power they consume. Devices powered by PoE switches are often, but not always, located in the same physical space
as the switch in which case they contribute the full 100% of dissipated heat to the space. In this course, we assume
that the entire electrical power is dissipated locally.
Now, let’s take some time and discuss how to best determine the complete system heat output.
It’s important to note that the air conditioning units in the data center create a significant amount of heat from fans and
compressors. This heat is exhausted to the outside and does not create a thermal load inside the data center. It
does, however, detract from the efficiency of the air conditioning system and is normally accounted for when the air
conditioner is sized.
Let’s begin calculating total cooling requirements by starting with our data center assumptions.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
Power Distribution
6%
Lighting
9%
UPS
13%
IT Load
People
70%
2%
This pie chart illustrates the components that contribute to the heat output in the data center.
For the purposes of our example, let’s assume a 5,000 square foot, (465 square meter) data center that is rated at 250
kW. It holds 150 racks and a maximum staff of 20 persons. The data center is assumed to be loaded at 30% of capacity,
which is typical. The total IT load of the data center in this case would be 30% of 250 kW, or 75 kW. Additionally, for the
purposes of the example, it is assumed that the UPS/Batteries and PDUs are located in the same physical space as the
IT load.
The thermal load is 180 kW, which is 50% more than the IT load.
Note that the contributions to the thermal output of the UPS and the Power Distribution are amplified by the fact that the
system is operating at only 30% of capacity. If the system was operating at 100% of capacity, the efficiency of the
power systems would increase and their relative contributions to the thermal output of the system would decrease.
The significant loss of efficiency is a real cost to oversizing a system.
Let’s take each of our heat producing components one by one so that we can understand how to work through our heat
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
output calculation worksheet. Our first component will be the IT equipment.
For more information on how to calculate present and future IT power loads, please consider participating in the DCU
course “Calculating Total Power Requirements”.
To calculate this loss, we simply take the power rating of our sample data center in this case, 250 kW and multiply by
.04 this calculates to the number 10. We then add this result (10 kW) to the product of our total IT load (75 kW)
multiplied by the loss proportional to the operating factor (.06) to get 4.5 kW. The sum of these two results, 10 kW +
4.5 kW = 14.5 kW.
Now that we’ve calculated the heat output we are generating from our UPS and batteries, let’s move on to the power
distribution system.
To calculate this loss, we simply take the power rating of our sample data center (250 kW) and multiply by the fixed loss
Calculating Total Cooling Requirements Page |5
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
factor of .02. We then add this result (5 kW) to the product of our total IT load (75 kW) and multiply by the .02 loss
proportional to operating power, which gives us a figure of 1.5 kW. The sum of these two results, 5 kW + 1.5 kW = 6.5
kW. This is the heat output we are generating from our power distribution system.
To calculate the lighting heat loss, we take the flooring area of our sample data center. If measuring in square feet, we
take our 5,000 square feet of space and multiply it by 2.0. This will give us a measurement of 10000 Watts. If
measuring in meters we take our 465 square meter data center and multiply it by 21.53. This gives us a measurement
of 10000 Watts. We also need to factor in the heat that humans give off while in the data center. For our people
calculation, we take our assumption of 20 people and multiply by 100. This gives us a calculation of 2,000 Watts.
Now, we take each of the measurements and convert them to kilowatts by dividing by 1000, so the Lighting Heat Output
is 10 kW of heat output, and the People Heat Output is 2 kW.
The data center will also experience additional heat sources that are encountered in the data center. So let’s explore
those next.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
outdoors, additional heat enters the data center which must be removed by the air conditioning system. If the data
room is located within the confines of an air-conditioned facility, these other heat sources (sunlight through windows
and heat conducted in from outside walls) may be ignored. However, if the data center has significant wall or ceiling
exposure to the outside, then an HVAC consultant will need to assess the maximum thermal load. These are extra heat
sources and it must be accounted for in the calculation of the thermal output of the complete system.
Humidification will also have an impact on the data center, so let’s discuss that next.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
plus any capacity added for redundancy. (This approach works well with smaller network rooms of under 4,000 square
feet / 372 square meters.) This results in the CRAC system being oversized up to 30%.
For more information on humidity in the data center, please consider participating in the DCU course “Fundamentals of
Cooling II Humidity in the Data Center”.
The Watt loads of each of these factors can be summed to determine the total thermal load.
Now let’s discuss future trends, along with the benefits to right-sizing the cooling solution.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.
Slide 25: Summary
Let’s wrap up with a quick review of the course material we have covered.
A proper assessment of cooling requirements can cut costs significantly. The challenge is to identify the balance
medium between insufficient cooling (and the threat of constant downtime) and over sizing (which is a common
problem resulting in unnecessary investments in unneeded capacity).
A simplified calculation technique with measurements involving IT load, power distribution, UPS, lighting and people
can help to provide a quick cooling estimate.
A first step to simplification is to standardize on a measurement methodology. The industry is looking to replace tons
and BTU measurements with kW measurements.
For larger data centers, the cooling requirements alone are typically not sufficient to select an air conditioner. The
effects of other heat sources such as walls and roof, along with recirculation, are significant and must be examined for
a particular installation.
The design of the air handling ductwork or raised floor has a significant effect on the overall system performance, and
also greatly affects the uniformity of temperature within the data center.
The adoption of a simple, standardized, and modular air distribution system architecture, combined with the simple
heat load estimation method described, could significantly reduce the engineering requirements for data center design.
Containment (HACS & CACS) should be considered as another key approach towards improving data center cooling
performance and efficiency.
© 2013 Schneider Electric. All rights reserved. All trademarks provided are the property of their respective owners.