0% found this document useful (0 votes)
253 views

Lecture9 PDF

This document provides lecture notes summarizing the canonical forms of hyperbolic, parabolic, and elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs). The hyperbolic PDE canonical form is uξη = 0. The parabolic PDE canonical form is uξξ + `1[u] = G. The elliptic PDE canonical form is uξξ + uηη + `1[u] = G. Examples are given of transforming specific PDEs into their canonical forms through coordinate changes.

Uploaded by

salman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
253 views

Lecture9 PDF

This document provides lecture notes summarizing the canonical forms of hyperbolic, parabolic, and elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs). The hyperbolic PDE canonical form is uξη = 0. The parabolic PDE canonical form is uξξ + `1[u] = G. The elliptic PDE canonical form is uξξ + uηη + `1[u] = G. Examples are given of transforming specific PDEs into their canonical forms through coordinate changes.

Uploaded by

salman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Jim Lambers

MAT 606
Spring Semester 2015-16
Lecture 9 Notes

These notes correspond to Sections 3.3-3.5 in the text.

Solving Canonical Hyperbolic Equations


Suppose a hyperbolic PDE is transformed into the simple canonical form

uξη = 0.

Then, this PDE is easily solved by integration, which yields the general solution

u(ξ, η) = F (ξ) + G(η),

where F and G are functions that can be determined from the initial conditions. This will be used
to derive a solution formula for the wave equation.

Canonical Form of Parabolic Equations


We now investigate the transformation of a parabolic PDE into the canonical form

uξξ + `1 [u] = G,

where `1 is a first-order differential operator. Using the notation from our general discussion of
coordinate change, this transformation is accomplished by ensuring that the coefficients of the
transformed PDE satisfy B = C = 0. However, because we already know that the original and
transformed PDE are both parabolic, it is sufficient to ensure that C = 0, because any nonsingular
2
coordinate transformation will ensure that δ(L) = B − AC = 0, from which it follows that if
C = 0, then B = 0 as well. We therefore need to solve
1
C = Aηx2 + 2Bηx ηy + Cηy2 = (Aηx + Bηy )2 = 0,
A
where we have used the fact that δ(L) = B 2 − AC = 0. Along coordinate curves η = constant, we
have
dη = ηx dx + ηy dy = 0,
which yields
dy ηx B
=− = .
dx ηy A
Solving this ODE provides a formula for η in terms of x and y. The only requirement for the other
characteristic variable, ξ, is that the Jacobian of the coordinate change

J = ξx ηy − ηx ξy

is nonzero. Note that whereas hyperbolic PDE have two families of characteristics, defined by
ξ = constant and η = constant, parabolic PDE have only one.

1
Example 1 The PDE

x2 uxx − 2xyuxy + y 2 uyy + xux + yuy = 0, x > 0,

is parabolic, as B 2 − AC = (−xy)2 − x2 y 2 = 0. The change of variables that makes C̄ = 0 satisfies


the ODE
dy −xy y
= 2 =− .
dx x x
Rearranging yields the separable equation
1 1
dy = − dx,
y x
which can be integrated to obtain η = xy. For simplicity, we choose ξ = x, which ensures that
J = ξx ηy − ηx ξy = (1)(x) − y(0) = x > 0. We then obtain the PDE
1
uξξ + uξ = 0.
ξ
To solve this, we let w = uξ to obtain a first-order ODE
1
wξ + w = 0,
ξ
which has the solution
R f (η)
w(ξ, η) = e− 1/ξ dξ
f (η) = ,
ξ
where f is arbitrary. We then have
Z
v= w dξ = f (η) ln |ξ| + g(η),

where g is also arbitrary. This yields the general solution

u(x, y) = f (xy) ln |x| + g(xy).

Canonical Form of Elliptic Equations


For elliptic PDE, we seek the canonical form

uξξ + uηη + `1 [u] = G,

where, as before, `1 is a first-order differential operator. That is, we require A = C and B = 0.


That is,

A(ξx2 − ηx2 ) + 2B(ξx ξy − ηx ηy ) + C(ξy2 − ηy2 ) = 0, (1)


Aξx ηx + B[ξx ηy + ξy ηx ] + Cξy ηy = 0. (2)

If we define φ = ξ + iη, where i = −1, then we have

φ2x = ξx2 − ηx2 + 2iξx ηx ,


φx φy = ξx ξy − ηx ηy + i(ξx ηy + ξy ηx ),
φ2y = ξy2 − ηy2 + 2iξy ηy .

2
Substitution into the equations for (1), (2) yields

Aφ2x + 2Bφx φy + Cφ2y = 0,

which is the same equation solved in the hyperbolic case. Proceeding as in that case, we obtain
ODEs √
dy B ± i AC − B 2
= ,
dx A
which yield formulas for two families of complex characteristics, φ1 and φ2 , that are complex
conjugates of one another. We then obtain

ξ = Re φ1 , η = Im φ1 .

Expressing the original PDE in the new variables ξ and η yields the desired canonical form.

Example 2 The Tricomi equation

uxx + xuyy = 0, x > 0,

is elliptic, as B 2 − AC = 02 − 1(x) = −x < 0. The complex characteristics φ1 and φ2 arise from


solutions of the ODEs
dy √
= ±i x,
dx
which are
3
φ1 , φ2 = y ± ix3/2 .
2
It follows that the real characteristic variables are
3
ξ = y, η = x3/2 .
2
From the formulas for the transformed coefficients, we obtain the PDE
9 9 3
uxx + xuyy = xuξξ + xuηη + x−1/2 uη = 0,
4 4 4
which, in the characteristic variables, becomes
 
9 1
uξξ + uηη + uη = 0,
4 3η

which is in canonical form. 2

You might also like