Ranie B. Monteclaro reflects on a video about the Enron scandal. Enron portrayed an image of success, but internally encouraged unethical behavior to meet unrealistic targets. Top leaders tolerated questionable practices as long as profits increased. Issues cited include lack of transparency in financial reports through improper accounting, intimacy between Enron leadership and politicians that prevented oversight, and abusive use of power through high-pressure performance reviews. The lesson is that good governance requires attention to ethics, not just numbers.
Ranie B. Monteclaro reflects on a video about the Enron scandal. Enron portrayed an image of success, but internally encouraged unethical behavior to meet unrealistic targets. Top leaders tolerated questionable practices as long as profits increased. Issues cited include lack of transparency in financial reports through improper accounting, intimacy between Enron leadership and politicians that prevented oversight, and abusive use of power through high-pressure performance reviews. The lesson is that good governance requires attention to ethics, not just numbers.
Monteclaro A31 AUD 312 – Governance, Business Ethics, Risk Management & Internal Control
1. What is your reflection on the video? (5points)
An alcohol dealer remarked: “I supply intoxicating drinks to whites and blacks, nationals and foreigners, young and old, literate and illiterate. Yes, all of them look different but to me all money looks the same”, this mindset of an alcohol dealer is the mindset I can see to the Corporate officers of Enron Company. Enron was too big to fail at that time. It was considered as one of the most admired companies during the time of their reign. However, if you will look past the image that they project to the stock market and the public, one will see the height of corporate greed and intolerable culture of competitiveness. People at the top encouraged the culture of getting things done despite questionable means of achieving them. Top leadership tolerate unscrupulous traders as long that they make money for the company. With unrealistic targets and neck-to-neck type of performance evaluation wherein bottom raters are kicked out of the company, the system bred arrogant and highly competitive players willing to take in unbelievable risks to the company in hope of reaping the highest possible returns. The lesson therefore is that intelligence can take you only so far, but without paying attention to doing the right things, there would be dire consequences. At the end of the day, the case should be a wake-up call to the investors, bankers and public that they should pay attention to the type of people running the company that they have stakes in. We should look past the numbers and understand how do these companies really make money and how their top leadership behave.
2. Based on your initial understanding of corporate governance, what
do you think were the governance issues/ bad practices that was shown in the documentary? Cite atleast 3 issues and explain briefly. (5 points each) Faithful Representation and Transparency of Financial Reports
Using the mark-to-market accounting, future receivable from
signed deals were recognized regardless whether cash was already received or whether the deal would prosper in the long haul or would just go puff. By this, the company able to their financial report look so attractively good. There is also an instance that Jeffrey Skilling refuses to answer one of the questions of the reporter at fortune interview because he says that he is not the accountant, instead he sent financial personnel including Andy Fostow. After how many hours of finding the documents Fostow says to the reporter that “I don’t care what you write about the company just don’t make us look bad”.
Intimacy
As what the video presented, Jeffrey Skilling the CEO of Enron
Company has a good relationship with the U.S President George W. Bush. The President does not take any action instead He allows the Company to own California and started to control the electric power in order to increase the bills of its consumers.
Abusive use of Power
As I have said earlier, Top leadership tolerate unscrupulous
traders as long that they make money for the company. With unrealistic targets and neck-to-neck type of performance evaluation wherein bottom raters are kicked out of the company, the system bred arrogant and highly competitive players willing to take in unbelievable risks to the company in hope of reaping the highest possible returns. The company fired 10% of the employees who grades the company 5.
Buy ebook Disseminating Your Action Research: A Practical Guide to Sharing the Results of Practitioner Research 1st Edition Craig A. Mertler cheap price