CHE 165A L11 - Heat Exchanger Design PDF
CHE 165A L11 - Heat Exchanger Design PDF
Wagner 1
Heat Duty
Heat-transfer media
Temperature driving force for heat transfer
Pressure drop
Exchanger Temperature Profiles
27 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Heat Exchangers
• Tubular Exchangers
• Convection
Q = U A ∆T
• Usually the governing mechanism in most process applications
Q = heat duty
• Radiation A = area
Q = A σ ε (ΔT4) T = absolute temperature
k = thermal conductivity
• Important in fired heaters
U = heat transfer coefficient
σ = Stefan Boltzman const.
ε = transmission factor
Q = U A (Th − Tc )
ro
ln (ro / ri )
ri
1 1 1
= + +
ro U ro h o k ri h i
• Q = U A ΔTm
Q = U A F ΔTlm
• F is sometimes called Ft
hot out
hot in
cold out cold in
Operational maintenance
Availability
Cost
Key Heat Exchanger Types
37 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
• Tubular Exchangers
Into this -
Baffle assembly
Inserting
Welding the shell tubes
Final
product
Tubesheet
Source: Bos-Hatten Inc.: www.Bos-Hatten.com
© 2012 G.P. Towler / UOP. For educational use in conjunction with
Towler & Sinnott Chemical Engineering Design only. Do not copy
Chemical Engineering Design
Tube Bundles
U-tubes
Tubesheet
Baffles
Source: UOP
• S&T heat exchangers are built to standards set by the Thermal Exchanger
Manufacturers Association (TEMA)
A B • B Type
• Must break piping connections to open
exchanger
• Single tube side joint
C N • C Type
• Channel to tubesheet joint eliminated
• Bundle integral with front head
• N Type
D • Fixed tubesheet with removable cover
plate
• D Type
• Special closures for high pressure
applications
F • F Type
• Counter current flow obtained. Baffle leakage problems.
G
• G Type
• Lower pressure drop
• H Type
H • Horizontal thermosyphon reboilers
• J Type
J • Older reboiler designs
• K Type
K • Phase separation integral to exchanger
• X Type
X • Lowest pressure drop, low F factor
• M Type
L M • Same as B type front head
• N Type
P • Same as N type front head
N
• P & W Types
• Rarely used
S T
• S Type
• Floating head with backing ring
U W
• T Type
• Floating head pulls through shell
• U Type
• Removable bundle without floating head
t1 R = (T1 - T2)
T2 (t2 – t1)
30 60 90 45
• Sometimes use larger pitch for easier cleaning (but bigger shell,
lower shellside h.t.c.)
FEATURE USE PATTERN:
lower ∆P on shellside square (effective only at low Re number)
shellside fouling square - easier cleaning
horizontal shellside square - prevent vapor blanketing
boiling
decrease shell size fit 15% more tubes if triangular pitch used
© 2012 G.P. Towler / UOP. For educational use in conjunction with
Towler & Sinnott Chemical Engineering Design only. Do not copy
Chemical Engineering Design
Flow Over Tube Banks
53 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Conventional Tube Layouts
54 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Baffle Types & Shell Flow Patterns
max unsupported
tube span
FULL
TUBEFIELD
max unsupported
tube span
FULL
TUBEFIELD
max unsupported
tube span
• Tubular Exchangers
Vapors
Air, 10 psig 10 10
Hydrogen, 50 psig 100 100
Hydrogen, 500 psig 400 400
Hydrocarbon vapor, 50 psig 60 60
Noncondensible gas, 2 psig 5 5
Note: Coefficients are based on 3/4 inch diameter tubes. For Tube side flows, correct by
multiplying by 0.75/Actual OD. Estimated accuracy is 25%. For 50% hydrogen in
vapor, reduce h to 2/3 of pure H2 value.
© 2012 G.P. Towler / UOP. For educational use in conjunction with
Towler & Sinnott Chemical Engineering Design only. Do not copy
Chemical Engineering Design
Approximate Fouling Factors
Fluid f (Btu/(hr.ft2.F))
Operating pressure
Fouling resistances
Design of Key Exchanger Types
66 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Additional constraints
Max. and min. fluid velocities
Max. and min. temperatures
Materials of construction
Heat-transfer area
Tube diameter and thickness
Tube length
Pressure of fluids
Materials and construction
Baffling requirements
Supports
Auxiliaries
CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
69
General Method for Designing Heat Exchangers
70 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
1. Determine flowrate and rate of heat transfer required for given system
2. Select the type of exchanger to be used and establish basic
specifications
3. Evaluate overall HT and film coefficients – know limitations
4. Evaluate the temperature driving force throughout the exchanger
5. Determine the required heat transfer area and exchanger dimensions
6. Analyze all results to determine if all design details are satisfactory
7. If step 6 shows inadequate design, start again from step 2
Heat Transfer in Exothermic reactors
71 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Many methods dealing with heat transfer in reactors also affect the
distribution of chemicals. Treated first are exothermic reactors.
H21: To remove a highly-exothermic heat of reaction, consider the use
of excess reactant, an inert diluent, and cold shots. These affect
the distribution of chemicals and should be inserted early in
process synthesis.
H22: For less exothermic heats of reaction, circulate reactor fluid to an
external cooler, or use a jacketed vessel or cooling coils. Also,
consider the use of intercoolers
Some content adopted from Wiley Instructor materials for SSL, 4/e
Heat Transfer in Exothermic reactors
72 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Cold Shots
Excess Reactant
Diabatic Operation
Inert Diluent
Intercoolers
Example: Ammonia Synthesis
73 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
Some content adopted from Wiley Instructor materials for SSL, 4/e
Heat Transfer in Endothermic reactors
74 CHE 165 – Plant Design; D. Wagner
• Tubular Exchangers
U
tubes
Plates
Gasket
Source: Alfa-Laval, www.AlfaLaval.com
© 2012 G.P. Towler / UOP. For educational use in conjunction with
Towler & Sinnott Chemical Engineering Design only. Do not copy
Chemical Engineering Design
Gasket Layout of Alternating Plates
• Disadvantages
• Lots of gaskets
• Lower design pressure, temperature
• External leakage if gaskets fail
• Applications
• Food processing, brewing, biochemicals, etc.
Source: Alfa-Laval,
Alfa-Laval www.AlfaLaval.com
© 2012 G.P. Towler / UOP. For educational use in conjunction with
Towler & Sinnott Chemical Engineering Design only. Do not copy
Chemical Engineering Design
Welded Plate Heat Exchangers
• Advantages
– Higher thermal efficiency
Source: Alfa-Laval Packinox
– Single unit can replace multiple shell &
tube units
– Closer approach to hot inlet temperature
– Low pressure drop
– Little chance of vibration problems
– Excellent distribution of two phase flows
• Disadvantages
– Single alloy material for plates
– Difficult to clean
– Few manufacturers at large scale (Alfa
Laval Packinox)