Don't Trust Your Simulation - Computational Materials Science On Its Way To Maturity?
Don't Trust Your Simulation - Computational Materials Science On Its Way To Maturity?
PROGRESS REPORT
Don't Trust your Simulation -
Computational Materials Science
on Its Way to Maturity?
By Dierk Raabe*
Progress reports are a new type of article in Advanced Engineering Materials, dealing with the hottest
current topics, and providing readers with a critically selected overview of important progress in these
fields. It is not intended that the articles be comprehensive, but rather insightful, selective, critical,
opinionated, and even visionary. We have approached scientists we believe are at the very forefront of
these fields to contribute the articles, which will appear on an annual basis. The article below describes
the latest advances in Computational Materials Science.
1. A Model is a Model is a Model companied by scrutinizing the model ingredients and bound-
ary conditions of that calculation in the same critical way as
The title of this article is of course meant to provoke. Why? an experimentalist would check his experimental set-up.
Because a menace of confusing models with reality always In the following I will address some important aspects of
exists. Does anyone nowadays refer to ªfirst principles simu- computational materials science. The selection is of course
lationsº? This point is well taken. However, practically all of biased (more structural than functional; more metals than
the current predictions in this domain are based on simulat- non-metals; more mesoscale than atomic scale). I will try to
ing electron dynamics using local density functional theory. reach a balance between fundamental and applied topics. The
These simulations, though providing a deep insight into ma- article focuses particularly on topics and publications of 2001
terials ground states, are not exact but approximate solutions of and 2002.
the Schrödinger equation, whichÐwe should not forgetÐis a
model itself.[1] Does anyone still refer to ªfinite-element simu-
lationsº? This point is also well taken. However, also in this 2. Some Semantics of Modeling and Simulation
case one has to admit that approximate solutions to large sets
of nonlinear differential equations formulated for a (non-ex- Before continuing in medias res, let us revisit some basic
isting) continuum under idealized boundary conditions is thoughts on the semantics of modeling and simulation. The
what it is: a model of nature but not reality. words modeling and simulation are often distinguished by
But let us calm down and render the discussion a bit more somewhat arbitrary arguments or they are simply used syno-
seriousness: current methods of ground-state calculations are nymously. This lack of clarity reflects that concepts in compu-
definitely among the cutting-edge disciplines in computa- tational materials science develop faster than semantics. To
tional materials science and the community has learnt much establish a common language in this field, a less ambiguous
from it during the last years. Similar aspects apply for some
continuum-based finite-element simulations. After all, this ar- ±
ticle is meant to attract readers into this exciting field and not [*] Prof. D. Raabe
to repulse them. And for this reason I feel obliged to first Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung
make a point in underscoring that any interpretation of a re- Max-Planck-Str. 1, D-40237 Düsseldorf (Germany)
search result obtained by computer simulation should be ac- E-mail: [email protected]
ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS 2002, 4, No. 5 Ó WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim, 2002 1438-1656/02/0505-0255 $ 17.50+.50/0 255
Raabe/Computational Materials Science on Its Way to Maturity?
definition of both concepts might be helpful. In current un- advantageous material properties. Following Haasen,[5] mi-
PROGRESS REPORT
derstanding the word modeling (model (Latin, Italian): copy, crostructure can be understood as the sum of all thermody-
replica, exemplar) often covers two quite different meanings, namic non-equilibrium lattice defects on a space scale that
namely, model formulation and numerical modeling. The latter ranges from Angstrùms (point defects) to meters (sample
term is frequently used as a synonym for numerical simula- surface). Its temporal evolution ranges from picoseconds
tion (simulare (Latin): fake, duplicate, mimic, imitate). I think (dynamics of atoms) to years (fatigue, creep, corrosion, diffu-
that the general synonymous use of the terms modeling and sion). Haasens's definition clearly underlines that microstruc-
simulation is not an ideal choice. Rosenblueth and Wiener[2] ture does not mean micrometer, but non-equilibrium.
offered an elegant comment on this point, which underlines Some of the previously suggested size- and time-scale
that the creation of models encompasses a much more gener- hierarchy classifications group microstructure research into
al concept than simulation. According to their work the gen- macroscale, mesoscale, and microscale (recently, nanoscale
eral intention of a scientific inquiry is to obtain an under- has become very popular, too) (Fig. 1). They take a somewhat
standing and a control of some parts of the universe. different perspective at this topic in that they refer to the real
However, most parts of the real world are neither sufficiently length scale of microstructures (often ignoring the intrinsic
obvious nor simple that they could be grasped and controlled
without abstraction. Scientific abstraction consists in replac-
ing the part of the real world under investigation by a model.
This process of designing models can be regarded as the gen-
uine scientific method of formulating a simplified imitation
of a real situation with preservation of its essential features.
In other words, a model describes a part of a real system by
using a similar but simpler structure. Abstract models can thus
be regarded as the basic starting point of theory. However, it
must be underlined that there exists no such thing as a uni-
fied exact method of deriving models. This applies particular-
ly for the materials sciences, where one deals with a large
variety of scales, mechanisms, and parameters. The notion
simulation, in contrast, is often used in the context of running
computer codes that have been designed according to a cer-
tain model. A more detailed discussion of these admittedly
philosophical aspects has been published before.[3,4]
Dierk Raabe graduated at the Institut für Metallkunde und Metallphysik at RWTH Aachen in 1990.
After his Dissertation under the guidance of Kurt Lücke in 1992 he worked in the fields of computational
materials science, textures, and composites. After his Habilitation in 1997 he joined the Department of
Materials Science and Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University in Pennsylvania and the National
High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Florida. Since 1999 he is a director of the Max-Planck-Institut für
Eisenforschung in Düsseldorf. Among other recognitions he received a Heisenberg scholarship, the
Adolf-Martens Award, the Masing Award, the Best Paper Award 1995 of Steel Research, the European
Materials Science and Technology Prize, and the Dr. Meyer±Struckmann Award. The author is teaching
in the fields of computational materials science, textures, and polycrystal mechanics at RWTH Aachen
and at Carnegie Mellon University.
time scales). This might oversimplify the situation and sug- classifications and decide how to integrate them into macro-
PROGRESS REPORT
gest that we can linearly isolate the different space scales scopic constitutive concepts or subject them to further de-
from each other. In other words the classification of micro- tailed investigation. In other words, the mechanisms that gov-
structures into a scale sequence merely reflects a spatial ern microstructure kinetics do not know about scales. It was
rather than a crisp physical classification (Table 1). For in- often found in materials science thatÐonce a basic new mech-
stance, small defects, such as dopants, can have a larger influ- anism or effect was discoveredÐa subsequent avalanche of
ence on strength or conductivity than large defects such as basic and also phenomenological work followed, opening the
precipitates. Think, for instance, about the highly complex path to new materials, new processes, new products, and
phenomenon of shear banding. This can be initiated not only sometimes even new industries. Well-known examples are
by interactions among dislocations or between dislocations the dislocation concept, transistors, aluminum reduction, aus-
and point defects but also by a stress concentration intro- tenitic stainless steels, superconductivity, or precipitation
duced by the local sample shape, surface topology, or pro- hardening. The identification of key mechanisms, therefore,
cessing method. has a bottleneck function in microstructure research and com-
However, if we accept that everything is connected with putational materials science plays a key role in it. This applies
everything and that linear scale separation could blur the particularly when closed analytical expressions cannot be
view on important scale-crossing mechanisms, what is the formulated and when the investigated problem is not easily
consequence of this insight? One clear answer to that is: we accessible to experiments.
do what materials scientists always didÐwe look for mecha-
nisms. Let us be more precise. While former generations of
materials researchers often focused on mechanisms or effects
that pertain to single lattice defects and less complex mecha-
nisms amenable to basic analytical theory or experiments 4. Models for Microstructure
available in those times, present materials researchers have
4.1. Who Needs Electrons and Atoms?
three basic advantages for identifying new mechanisms. First,
ground-state and molecular dynamics simulations have ma- In the introduction we mentioned the predictive power of
tured to a level at which we can exploit them to discover pos- ground-state and molecular dynamics calculations. But what
sible mechanisms at high resolution and reliability. This about possible collective mechanisms above this scale? Under-
means that materials theory is for the first time standingÐin standing microstructure mechanisms at these scales requires
terms of the addressed time and space scaleÐon robust quan- the use of adequate simulation methods. This domain, which
titative grounds, allowing us insights we could not get before. is sometimes referred to as computational microstructure
It is hardly necessary to mention the obvious benefits arising science, is rapidly growing in terms of both improved compu-
from increased computer power in this context. Second, ex- tational methods and scientific harvest. Among these, espe-
perimental techniques have been improved to such a level cially the various Ginzburg±Landau-based phase-field kinetic
thatÐalthough sometimes only with enormous effortsÐnew models, discrete dislocation dynamics, cellular automata,
theoretical findings can be critically scrutinized by experi- Potts-type q-state models, vertex models, crystal plasticity fi-
ment (e.g., microscopy, nanomechanics, diffraction). Third, nite-element models, and texture component crystal plasticity
due to advances in both theory and experiment more com- finite-element models deserve particular attention.
plex, self-organizing, critical, and collective nonlinear mecha- The predictive power of these approaches depends to a
nisms can be elucidated, which cannot be understood by large extent on their approach to deal with the transition from
studying only one single defect or one single length scale. the quantum and atomic scale to the continuum scale. In
All these comments can be condensed to the statement that other words, only three basic theoretical standard approaches
microstructure simulation, as far as a fundamental under- exist currently to map matter in a model, namely the quan-
standing is concerned, consists in the hunt for key mechanisms. tum scale (dynamics of electrons, relaxation of nuclei), the
Only after identifying those we can (and should) make scale atomic scale (atom and molecular dynamics), and the conti-
nuum scale. An essential challenge in any computational ma-
terials approach, therefore, lies in bringing these three con-
cepts into agreement and avoid contradictions. This means
Table 1. Classification of microstructures.
that simulation approaches that are formulated at different
scales should provide very similar results when tackling the
Scale Quantum Molecular Mesoscopic Macroscopic same problem. For instance, some dislocation mechanisms
mechanics dynamics have recently been simulated using phase-field theory,[6] line
Time 10±16±10±12 10±13±10±10 10±10±10±6 >10±6
tension modeling,[7] and even Monte Carlo simulation.[8] In
scales [s] the following, I shall enter the field of continuum simulations
far above the quantum and atomic scale and review recent
Length 10±11±10±8 10±9±10±6 10±6±10±3 >10±3
scales [m]
progress achieved by some of the important methods in this
domain.
4.2. Ginzburg±Landau-Type Phase Field Kinetic Models recent contribution was by Wang et al.,[6] who formulated a
PROGRESS REPORT
space, or wave-vector space occur as well. Space is defined crostructures formed during recrystallization. The method
PROGRESS REPORT
on a regular array of lattice points. The state of each lattice was applied to starting data obtained by a preceding crystal
point is given by a set of state variables. These can be particle plasticity finite-element simulation (Fig. 2). Various nuclea-
densities, lattice-defect quantities, crystal orientation, particle tion scenarios were discussed also with respect to macroscop-
velocity, or any other internal variable the model requires. ic effects such as friction (Fig. 3), shear localization, and yield
Each state variable defined at a lattice point assumes one out surface evolution during recrystallization. Further studies
of a finite set of possible discrete states. The opening state of addressed the simulation of mesoscale microstructures and
an automaton is defined by mapping the initial distribution damage evolution.[28,29]
of the values of the chosen state variables
onto the lattice. The dynamical evolution of
the automaton takes place through the appli-
cation of deterministic or probabilistic trans-
formation rules (switching rules) that act on
the state of each point. The temporal evolu-
tion of a state variable at a lattice point given
at time (t0+Dt) is determined by its present
state at t0 (or its last few states t0, t0±Dt, etc.)
and the state of its neighbors. Due to space
being discrete, the type of neighboring af-
fects the local transformation rates and the
evolving morphologies. Cellular automata
work in discrete time steps. After each time
interval the values of the state variables are
updated for all lattice points in synchrony.
Owing to their features, cellular automata
provide a discrete method of simulating the
evolution of complex dynamical systems,
which contain large numbers of similar com-
ponents, on the basis of their interactions.
During the last years, cellular automata have Fig. 2. Simulation of primary static recrystallization within a single deformed grain. The upper graphs show
increasingly gained momentum for the the change in the distribution of the simulated dislocation density during recrystallization. The lower graphs
indicate different orientations by different colors (the white areas are as-deformed). The initial deformation sim-
simulation of microstructure evolution in the ulation was performed using a crystal plasticity finite-element model. The set-up consisted of a single alumi-
[3,21,22]
materials sciences. The enormous ver- num grain with face centered cubic crystal structure and {111} <110> slip systems, which was embedded in a
plastic continuum and had the elastic±plastic properties of an aluminum polycrystal with random texture. The
satility of the cellular automaton approach sample was plane strain deformed to 50 % thickness reduction. The resulting data (dislocation density, orienta-
for microstructure simulations, particularly tion distribution) were used as input data for a cellular automaton recrystallization simulation. Details of the
simulation have been published before [23].
in the fields of recrystallization, grain
growth, and phase-transformation phenom-
ena, is due to its flexibility in using a large
variety of state variables and transformation
rules.
Important fields where microstructure
based cellular automata have been recently
successfully used in the materials sciences
are primary static recrystallization and re-
covery, formation of dendritic grain struc-
tures in solidification processes, as well as
related nucleation and coarsening phenom-
ena.[23] For instance, Ding and Guo[24] have
recently addressed the complicated field of
dynamic recrystallization by using cellular
automaton simulations. Gandin[25] used a 3D
cellular automaton±finite-element model for Fig. 3. Two subsequent stages of a 2D isothermal simulation of primary static recrystallization in a deformed
the prediction of macrostructures formed in aluminum polycrystal on the basis of crystal plasticity finite-element data. The upper figures show the change
in dislocation density. The lower figures show the change in microtexture. The gray areas in the upper figures
casting. Raabe[23,26,27] conducted cellular indicate a stored dislocation density of zero, i.e., these areas are recrystallized. Details of the simulation have
automaton simulations of textures and mi- been reported before [26].
4.5. Potts-Type Multi-Spin Models for Microstructure contain networks consisting of large sets of interconnected
PROGRESS REPORT
tially due to the intricate interaction of the grains during co- conducted a finite-element investigation of the effect of parti-
PROGRESS REPORT
deformation, leading to strong heterogeneity in terms of cle distribution on the uniaxial stress±strain behavior of parti-
strain, stress, and crystal orientation. One major aim of plas- culate-reinforced metal±matrix composites. Other studies
ticity research consequently lies in mapping and predicting were published by Kraft et al.,[47] who presented finite-ele-
this crystallographic anisotropy during large strain plastic de- ment simulations of die pressing and sintering, and by Soppa
formation of polycrystalline matter. In this context, it is essen- et al.[48] who conducted a study of in-plane deformation of
tial to note that the crystals rotate during deformation owing two-phase materials. Important recent studies on the incor-
to the antisymmetry of the displacement gradients created by poration of statistical texture models into finite-element
crystal slip.[39] (Figs. 4,5). formulations were presented by Aretz et al.[49,50] and Peeters
Crystal plasticity finite-element models provide a direct et al.[51,52]
means for updating the anisotropic material state via integra-
tion of the evolution equations for the crystal lattice orienta-
4.8. Texture Component Crystal Plasticity Finite-Element
tion and the critical resolved shear stress. The deformation
Models
behavior of the grains can at each integration point be deter-
mined by a crystal plasticity model, which accounts for plas- The recently introduced texture component crystal plastic-
tic deformation by crystallographic slip and for the rotation ity finite-element method (TCCP-FEM) is based on directly
of the crystal lattice during deformation. In most crystal mapping a small set of discrete and mathematically compact
plasticity finite-element simulations one assumes the stress orientation components onto the integration points of a non-
response at each continuum material point to be potentially linear crystal plasticity finite-element model.[53±55] The spheri-
given by one crystal or by a volume-averaged response of a cal orientation components can be extracted from experimen-
set of grains comprising the respective material point. The ac- tal data, such as pole figures stemming from X-ray or electron
commodation of the plastic portion of the total local deforma- diffraction. The main progress of this approach when com-
tion gradient is reduced to the degrees of freedom given by pared to the conventional crystal plasticity finite-element
the respective crystallographic slip dyads, rotated into the lo- method lies in identifying an efficient way of mapping a
cal coordinate crystal system, prescribed by the orientation(s) statistical and representative crystallographic orientation distri-
mapped at each integration point. The flow stress is typically bution rather than one single grain orientation on an integra-
described in terms of a viscoplastic law using an appropriate tion point.
hardening matrix, which relates strain hardening on one slip Four different techniques are commonly used to reproduce
system to shear on another.[40±45] Other important finite-ele- the orientation distribution function. The first group is re-
ment studies about the micromechanics of microstructures ferred to as direct inversion methods. These methods approx-
were recently published by BorbØly and Biermann[46] who imate textures by directly integrating the fundamental equa-
tion using a large set of pole figure points. The second group
comprises Fourier series expansions, which use spherical har-
monic library functions. The third method is the approxima-
tion of either of the two aforementioned functions by a set of
discrete and identically shaped single orientation points. The
fourth group, referred to as texture component method, com-
prises schemes that mathematically fit given orientation func-
tions or pole figures using spherical Gauss-type standard
functions.
Crystal plasticity finite-element approaches that update
Fig. 4. 3D crystal plasticity finite-element simulations of nanoindentation. The materi- the texture require a discrete representation of the continuous
al is single crystalline copper of different orientation and the indents are made by a
Berkovich indenter. The color coding shows the crystal orientation change around the
orientation distribution function at each integration point.
indents. This circumstance suggests the use of small groups of non-
Fig. 5. 2D crystal plasticity finite-element simulation (left) and experiment (right) of bicrystal deformation. The material
is aluminum and the grain boundary is a 36 tilt boundary. The sample has been plane strain deformed to 30 % engineer-
ing thickness reduction. The color coding in both diagrams shows the distribution of the accumulated von Mises strain.
The experiments have been performed by use of a stereologic photogrammetric displacement measurement.
identical discrete texture components and is based on the use pertise of discovering basic mechanisms and microstructural
PROGRESS REPORT
of symmetrical spherical orientation functions. This approach principles behind simulations rather than getting lost in the
provides a small set of compact texture components, which details.
are characterized by simple parameters of physical signifi-
cance (three Euler angles, full width at half maximum, vol-
ume fraction). Using this method, only a few texture compo- 6. Virtual Laboratories for the IndustryÐTools for
nents are required for mapping the complete texture in a Inverse Engineering
precise mathematical fashion. This is conducted in two steps.
First, the discrete main (center) orientation of each texture Computational materials scientists in industry and public
component is assigned in terms of its Euler triple (j1, u, j2) laboratories as well as some research foundations are often
onto each integration point. It is important in this context that not consequent enough when it comes to the introduction of
the use of the Taylor assumption locally allows one to map new and promising simulation approaches into industry. Re-
more than one orientation on an integration point. Second, all searchers sometimes have the tendency that once they have
main orientations of each component initially assigned to the accomplished a simulation task they move on to the next
integration points are rotated in such a way that their result- problem. This attitude has a healthy and a not so healthy side:
ing orientation distribution reproduces the texture function Of course a good researcher should always move on to the
derived before. The reproduction of a texture (e.g., alumi- next serious scientific challenge and try to solve it. Sticking
num, steel, copper, magnesium) usually requires 1±4 texture too much to solved problems means to neglect a huge set of
components plus a background random portion.[53±55] unsolved problems. On the other hand, researches in the
computational materials science community should tend
more to finish a certain initiative by making their results un-
5. Drowned by DataÐHandling and Analyzing derstandable andÐabove allÐfurther exploitable to possible
Simulation Data subsequent less-well trained users.
New simulation methods can be essential tools in the in-
A very good multi-particle simulation nowadays faces the dustry both with respect to the immediate prediction of a pro-
same problem as a good experiment, namely, the handling, cess or a product and in the form of virtual laboratories. While
analysis, and interpretation of the resulting data. Let us take the former aspect is obvious and often used by industry, the
for a moment the position of a quantum-Laplace-daemon and latter aspect has not yet been sufficiently utilized. Virtual la-
assume we can solve the Schrödinger equation for 1023 parti- boratories can be referred to as computer simulation methods
cles over a period of time that covers significant processes in that have been thoroughly tested and proven reliable and they
microstructure. What had we learned at the end? The answer can be used to explore changes in product quality under dif-
to that is: not much more than from an equivalent experiment ferent virtual boundary conditions of production. This corre-
with high lateral and temporal resolution. The major common sponds to the philosophy of inverse engineering where one
task of both operations would be to filter, analyze, and under- starts from a desired material condition and systematically
stand what we simulated/measured. We must not forget that investigates which steps must be taken for obtaining this state
the basic aim of most scientific initiatives consists in obtaining by use of computer simulation. Often such studies show that
a general understanding of principles that govern processes the possible solutions to an optimization problem are not
and states we observe in nature. This means that the mere unique but they allow the engineer to choose among different
mapping and reproduction of 1023 sets of single data microstructures and processes. Virtual laboratories can also
packages (e.g., 1023 times the positions and momentum of all be used to better interpret property changes of products in
particles as a function of time) can only build a quantitative terms of internal rather than in terms of external variables.
bridge to a basic understanding but it cannot replace it. This physically based method of formulating and exploiting
However, the advantages of this quantitative bridge built by constitutive laws in simulations generally provides deeper
the Laplacian super-simulation introduced above are at hand: insight when compared to empirical laws.
First, it would give us a complete and well-documented his-
tory record of all particles over the simulated period, i.e.,
more details than from any experiment. Second, once a simu-
7. Computational Bio-Materials Science
lation procedure is working properly it is often a small effort
to apply it to other cases. Third, simulations have the capabil- The life sciences are currently one of the most dynamical
ity to predict rather than only to describe. Fourth, in simula- fields of research. Computational methods play an ever larger
tions the boundary conditions are usually exactly known (be- role in this area. This section reviews some of the recent chal-
cause they are mathematically imposed) as opposed to lenges, analogies, and applications of materials simulation
experimentation where they are typically not so well known. methods to biomaterials and biological problems. It is likely,
Therefore, my initial statement about the concern of being due to the dynamics in this field, that interdisciplinary re-
drowned by simulation data aims at encouraging the compu- search between computational materials science and the life
tational materials science community to better cultivate an ex- sciences will play an increasing role in the next decade.
Typical areas where an overlap exists are the histological the user to conduct macromolecular simulations of complete
PROGRESS REPORT
and mechanical fundamentals of biological and artificial soft potential functions that include force fields for all biomolecu-
tissues, the micromechanics of arterial walls and cells, cardiac lar interactions. The atomic scale simulations in this field can
mechanical properties, vascular mechanics, ventricular me- provide insight into the fluctuations and conformational
chanics, cardiac electromechanical properties, and bypass changes of proteins, nucleic acids, protein±nucleic acid, and
mechanics. More areas with an overlap are in arterial regen- protein±lipid combinations. These calculations are still essen-
eration processes, flow properties of blood, rheology of blood tially limited to the nanosecond regime, which prohibits im-
in microvessels, viscoelasticity of collagen, DNA-based mo- portant processes such as large conformational transitions in
lecular design, molecular self-assembly mechanisms, biomo- proteins to be studied. Many techniques, such as coarse-
lecular motors, design and properties of bio-sensors, anti- graining and combination with finite-element methods,
body-antigen binding, and organ micromechanics. The might soon extend the length and time scale of these simula-
understanding and development of synthetic materials for tions. Several overviews of some important aspects of the cur-
the human body, including its cellular and genetic composi- rent state in this field have been published.[56±62]
tion, mechanical properties of muscles, patient-specific expert
and simulation systems for diagnosis and treatment, dynamic
micromechanical simulations of artificial diarthrodial joints,
the mechanics of articular cartilage layers, bone mechanics 8. Scaling, Coarse Graining, and Renormalization
including anisotropy and failure mechanisms, as well as
in Computational Materials Science
macromechanics of the musculoskeleton also pertain to these
overlap areas. When realizing that quantum mechanics is not capable of
Many of these challenges can be tackled by using simula- directly treating 1023 particles, the question arises how macro-
tion methods that have long been used in the computational scopic material properties of microstructured samples can
materials sciences. These methods include for instance elec- nonetheless be recovered from first principles. Numerous
tron dynamics and molecular dynamics approaches, switch- methods have been suggested to tackle such scale problems.
ing models such as the q-state Potts model or cellular automa- They can be classified into two basic groups, namely, multi-
ta, phase-field models, and finite-element models with scale methods and scale-bridging methods. The first set of ap-
incorporation of appropriate micromechanical constitutive proaches (multi-scale) consists in repeatedly including
descriptions. Since this section cannot provide an overview of parameters or rules that were obtained from simulations at a
all the computational methods used in this field, I shall only respective smaller scale in the simulation for the larger scale.
shade some light on the atomic regime. For instance, the interatomic potentials of a material can be
Electron and molecular dynamics methods are nowadays approximated using local density functional theory. This re-
routinely used to simulate solvated proteins, protein±DNA sult can enter molecular dynamics simulations by using it for
complex formation, ligand binding, or the mechanics of small the design of embedded atom or tight-binding potentials. The
proteins. The potentials used in this field depend on the prob- molecular dynamics code could now be used say for the sim-
lem addressed. For instance, mixed quantum mechanical± ulation of a dislocation reaction. Reaction rules and resulting
classical molecular dynamics simulations are used to study force fields of reaction products obtained from such predic-
enzymatic reactions in the context of the full protein. More tions could be part of a subsequent elastic discrete dislocation
empirical potential functions (often termed force field ap- dynamics simulations. The results obtained from this simula-
proximations), which include interactions via molecular tion could be used to derive the elements of a phenomenolo-
bonds and those independent of molecular bonds, are em- gical hardening matrix formulation and so on. Scale bridging
ployed to study molecular nanomechanics addressing aspects methods take a somewhat different approach at scaling. They
such as bond-stretch, bending angles, and torsion angles. As try to identify in phenomenological macroscopic constitutive
in the materials sciences, the more empirical potentials are laws those few key parameters that mainly map the atomic
used as a compromise between accuracy and efficiency. The scale physical nature of the investigated material and try to
potential parameters can be fitted in a way to match experi- skip some of the regimes between the atomic and the macro-
mental results and/or ground-state simulations. In experi- scopic scale.
mental terms the potentials typically are designed to repro- Both approaches suffer from the disadvantage that they do
duce structural data obtained from X-ray crystallography, not follow some basic and general transformation or scaling
dynamic data obtained from spectroscopy and inelastic neu- rules but require instead complete heuristical and empirical
tron scattering, as well as thermodynamic data. guidance. This means that both multi-scale and scale-bridg-
An essential limitation of empirical force field potentials is ing methods must be directed by well-trained intuition and
that they do not allow substantial changes in electronic struc- experience. An underlying and commonly agreed methodolo-
ture, i.e., they cannot model events such as bond formation or gy of extracting meaningful information from different scales
bond failure. Recently improved potential force field func- and implementing them into another does simply not exist.
tions have been developed in the form of hybrid quantum A similar but less arbitrary approach to this scale problem
mechanical±molecular mechanical force fields. This enables might lie in introducing suitable averaging methods that are
capable of reformulating forces among lattice defects accu- Although the idea of applying the principles of renormali-
PROGRESS REPORT
rately, in terms of a new model with renormalized interac- zation group theory to microstructures might seem appealing
tions obtained from an appropriate coarse graining algo- at first sight it is essential to underline that there exists no
rithm. Such a method could render some of the multi-scale general unified method of coarse graining microstructure
and scale-bridging efforts more systematic, general, and re- problems. Approaches in this context must therefore also first
producible. The basic idea of coarse graining and renormali- take a heuristic view at scaling and carefully check which ma-
zation group theory consists in identifying a set of transfor- terial property might be useful to assume the position of a
mations (group) that translate characteristic properties of a preserved function when translating the system to the respec-
system from one resolution to another. This procedure is as a tive coarser scale. Another challenge consists in identifying
rule not symmetric (semi-group). The transformations are appropriate methods to describe the in-grain and grain-to-
conducted in such a way that they preserve the fundamental grain behavior of the system clusters obtained by coarse
energetics of the system, such as for instance the value of the graining. On the other hand, coarse graining and renormali-
partition function. zation group theory might offer an elegant opportunity to
To understand the principle of renormalization let us con- eliminate empiricism encountered in some of the scaling ap-
sider an Ising lattice model that is defined by some spatial proaches used in microstructure simulations. Another advan-
distribution of the (Boolean) spins and its corresponding par- tage of applying renormalization group theory to microstruc-
tition function. The Ising model can be reformulated by ap- ture ensembles might be to elucidate universal scaling laws,
plying Kadanoff's original real-space coarse graining or block which are common also to other materials problems.[63±65]
spin approach. This algorithm works by summarizing a small Some important contributions to computational materials
subset of neighboring lattice spins and replacing them by one science along these lines were recently published by Thom-
single new lattice point containing one new single lattice spin. son, Levine, and Shim on percolation and self-organized criti-
The value of the new spin can be derived according to a deci- cal behavior in deforming metals,[66±68] by Rose et al. on some
mation or majority rule. The technique can be applied to the universal features of bonding in metals,[69] and by Nguyen
system in a repeated fashion until the system remains invar- and Ortiz on coarse scaling and renormalization of atomic-
iant under further transformation. The art of rendering these scale binding-energy relations with particular respect to frac-
repeated transformations a meaningful operation lies in the ture mechanics.[70]
way that the value of the partition function or some other
property of significance is preserved throughout the repeated
renormalizations. 9. Artificial Neural Networks in Materials
The effect of successive scale transformations is to generate ScienceÐThe Tale of the Surgeon and the
a flow diagram in the corresponding parameter space. The
Veterinarian
state flow occurs in our present example as a gradual change
of the renormalized coupling constant. Reaching scale invar- Doing materials science in the world of real materials pro-
iance finally is equivalent to transforming the system into a duction (and not in a model or laboratory world) means that
fixed point. These are points in parameter space that corre- we have to deal with fuzzy boundary conditions, unclear pro-
spond to a state where the system is self-similar, i.e., it re- duction parameters, insufficient reproducibility, and all kinds
mains unchanged upon further coarse graining and transfor- of similar ill-defined conditions. Making things even worse
mation. The system properties at fixed points are, therefore, we can add to this list of constraints the influence of markets,
truly fractal. Each fixed point has a surrounding region in labor, or ecology. Everyone who has ever been confronted
parameter space where all initial states finally end at the fixed with the task of mapping materials science that takes place
point upon renormalization, i.e., they are attracted by this for instance in a hot rolling mill producing a quarter of a mil-
point. The surface where such competing areas abut is re- lion tons of steels per month (»1034 atoms) into computational
ferred to as a critical surface. It separates the regions of the materials science will understand the problem (Fig. 6). In this
phase diagram that scale toward different single-component context, where physically based methods (the surgeon) often
limits. fail to quantitatively predict correlations between processes,
The approach outlined in this section is called direct or real microstructures, and products, advanced empirical nonlinear
space renormalization. For states on the critical surface, all learning systems (the veterinarian) in the form of artificial
scales of length coexist. The characteristic length for the sys- neural networks have brought substantial progress.
tem goes to infinity, becoming arbitrarily large with respect Artificial neural networks, which are sometimes also re-
to atomic-scale lengths. For magnetic phase transitions, the ferred to as adaptive methods, are a branch of the broad field
measure of the diverging length scale is the correlation of artificial intelligence. They mimic biological neural net-
length. For percolation, the diverging length scale is set by works although the latter are much more complicated than
the connectivity length of magnetic clusters. The presence of adaptive mathematical models. An artificial neural network
a diverging length scale is what makes it possible to apply to is an information processing method that is inspired by the
percolation the technique of real-space renormalization. way biological nervous systems, such as the brain, process
PROGRESS REPORT
Fig. 6. Simulations of materials processing, microstructures, and resulting properties
close to production reality require the consideration of fuzzy boundary conditions,
unclear production parameters, and insufficient reproducibility.
weight matrix. Thereafter, starting from an arbitrary config- [10] L. D. Landau, Collected Papers of L. D. Landau (Ed: D. Ter
PROGRESS REPORT
uration, the memory will settle on exactly that stored image, Haar), Gordon and Breach, New York 1965.
which is nearest to the starting configuration. Thus, given an [11] A. G. Khachaturyan, Theory of Structural Transformations
incomplete or corrupted version of a stored image, the net- in Solids, John Wiley, New York 1983.
work is able to recall the corresponding original image. The [12] Y. Wen, Y. Wang, L. Q. Chen, Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 13.
system can be used in any area of materials science where the [13] W. Dreyer, W. H. Müller, Int. J. Solid Struct. 2001, 38,
fast interpretation of complex image information is vital, e.g., 1433.
in the fields of quality control and failure detection in a pro- [14] Y. M. Jin, A. Artemev, A. G. Khachaturyan, Acta Mater.
duction environment.[3] 2001, 49, 2309.
[15] A. M. Mullis, R. F. Cochrane, Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 2205.
[16] Y. H. Wen, Y. Wang, L. Q. Chen, Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 13.
10. Conclusions [17] Multiscale Modeling of Materials (Eds: L. P. Kubin, J. L.
Bassani, K. Cho, H. Gao, R. L. B. Selinger), Materials
In this article I have made an approach to highlight some
Research Society Symposium Proceedings 653, Warren-
important current topics in the field of computational materi-
dale, PA 2001.
als science. Some of the chapters have concisely reviewed the
[18] V. S. Deshpande, A. Needleman, E. Van Der Giessen,
fundamentals of mature microstructure methods with partic-
Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 3189.
ular reference to lattice defect ensemble simulations above
[19] B. D. Wirth, M. J. Caturla, T. Diaz de la Rubia,
the atomic scale. Other chapters have taken a more general
T. Khraishi, H. Zbib, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B
perspective focussing on questions such as data handling or
2001, 180, 23.
the necessity to identify key mechanisms. What I feel is of
[20] V. S. Deshpande, A. Needleman, E. Van Der Giessen,
particular importance for the further scientific success and re-
Scr. Mater. 2001, 45, 1047.
putation of this exciting field is that we avoid creating pure
[21] J. von Neumann, Collected works of John von Neumann
simulation schools that work exclusively with computer
(Ed: A. W. Burks), Vol. 5, Pergamon Press, New York
models and neglect experimental feedback. Of course, specia-
1963.
lization is an essential issue nowadays but joint proposals
[22] S. Wolfram, Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata,
and mixed research programs should always make it possible
Advanced Series on Complex Systems, selected papers
to find a balance between the realm of simulations and ex-
1983±1986, Vol. 1, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte.
perimental validation. Another tremendous challenge lies in
Ltd, Singapore 1986.
developing smarter and more general methods to bridge the
[23] D. Raabe, Annual Review of Materials Research 2002, in
scales in multi-scale simulation initiatives in an unambiguous
press.
and reproducible fashion. I am convinced that in this field
[24] R. Ding, Z. X. Guo, Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 3163.
much can be improved by adopting methods developed in
[25] C.-A. Gandin, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2001, 3, 303.
the framework of renormalization group theory.
[26] D. Raabe, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2001, 3, 745.
[27] D. Raabe, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2000, 19, 13.
± [28] P. Matic, A. B. Geltmacher, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2001, 20,
[1] K. Ohno, K. Esfarjani, Y. Kawazoe, Computational Mate- 120.
rials Science. From Ab Initio to Monte Carlo Methods, [29] S. G. Psakhie, Y. Horie, G. P. Ostermeyer, S. Yu. Koros-
Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 129, Spring- telev, A. Yu. Smolin, E. V. Shilko, A. I. Dmitriev, S. Blat-
er-Verlag, Berlin 2000. nik, M. Spegel, S. Zavsek, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2001,
[2] W. Rosenblueth, N. Wiener, Philos. Sci. 1945, 12, 316. 37, 311.
[3] D. Raabe, Computational Materials Science, Wiley-VCH, [30] D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 1617.
Weinheim, 1998. [31] E. A. Holm, C. C. Battaile, JOM 2001, 9, 20.
[4] R. W. Cahn, The Coming of Materials Science, Pergamon [32] A. D. Rollett, D. Raabe, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2001, 21, 69.
Press, New York 2001. [33] B. Radhakrishnan, G. Sarma, H. Weiland, P. Baggethun,
[5] P. Haasen, Physikalische Metallkunde, Springer-Verlag, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2000, 8, 737.
Berlin 1984. [34] V. Tikare, E. A. Holm, D. Fan, L.-Q. Chen, Acta Mater.
[6] Y. U. Wang, Y. M. Jin, A. M. Cuitiæo, A. G. Khachatur- 1998, 47, 363.
yan, Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 1847. [35] C. Maurice, Proc. 21st Risù Symposium on Materials
[7] K. W. Schwarz, X. H. Liu, D. Chidambarrao, Mater. Sci. Science (Ed: N. Hansen), Risù, Roskilde, Denmark 2000,
Eng. A 2001, 309±310, 229. p. 431.
[8] S. Swaminarayan, R. LeSar, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2001, 21, [36] F. Montheillet, J. LØpinoux, D. Weygand, E. Rauch, Adv.
339. Eng. Mater. 2001, 3, 687.
[9] a) L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 1931, 37, 405. b) L. Onsager, [37] S. Shibata, T. Watanabe, Metall. Mater. Transact. 1999,
Phys. Rev. 1931, 38, 2265. 30A, 621.
[38] D. Weygand, Y. BrØchet, J. LØpinoux, Acta Mater. 1999, [54] D. Raabe, Z. Zhao, F. Roters, Steel Res. 2001, 72, 421.
PROGRESS REPORT
47, 961. [55] D. Raabe, P. Klose, B. Engl, K.-P. Imlau, F. Friedel,
[39] P. Dawson, Int. J. Solids Struct. 2000, 37, 115. F. Roters, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2002, 4, 169.
[40] D. Raabe, M. Sachtleber, Z. Zhao, F. Roters, S. Zaefferer, [56] Y. C. Fung, Biomechanics, Springer, New York 1993.
Acta Mater. 2001, 49, 3433. [57] S. J. Zhou, D. L. Preston, P. S. Lomdahl, D. M. Beazley,
[41] D. Raabe, Z. Zhao, S.-J. Park, F. Roters, Acta Mater. 2002, Science 1998, 279, 1525.
50, 421. [58] B. L. Holian, P. S. Lomdahl, Science 1998, 280, 2085.
[42] A. Bhattacharyya, E. El-Danaf, S. R. Kalidindi, R. D. [59] T. C. Bruice, K. Kahn, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4,
Doherty, Int. J. Plast. 2001, 17, 861. 540.
[43] B. Peeters, E. Hoferlin, P. Van Houtte, E. Aernoudt, Int. [60] H. J. C. Berendsen, S. Hayward, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
J. Plast. 2001, 17, 819. 2000, 10, 165.
[44] R. J. Morrissey, D. L. McDowell, T. Nicholas, Int. [61] F. G. Gianocotti, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997, 9, 691.
J. Fatigue 2001, 23, 55. [62] A. Goldbeter, Biochemical Oscillations And Cellular
[45] S. Bugat, J. Besson, A.-F. Gourgues, F. N'Guyen, Rhythms: The Molecular Bases Of Periodic And Chaotic Be-
A. Pineau, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2001, 317, 32. havior, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
[46] A. BorbØly, H. Biermann, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2000, 2, 366. [63] K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 1983, 55, 583.
[47] T. Kraft, H. Riedel, P. Stingl, F. Wittig, Adv. Eng. Mater. [64] K. Binder (Ed), in Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Phy-
1999, 2, 207. sics, Springer Topics in Current Physics, Springer, Berlin
[48] E. Soppa, P. Doumalin, P. Binkele, T. Wiesendanger, 1979.
M. Bornert, S. Schmauder, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2001, 3, 261. [65] R. Balian, J. Zinn-Justin (Ed), Methods in Field Theory,
[49] H. Aretz, R. Luce, M. Wolske, R. Kopp, M. Gördeler, North Holland, The Netherlands 1976.
G. Pomana, G. Gottstein, J. Phys. IV 2001, 11, 115. [66] R. Thomson, L. E. Levine, Y. Shim, Mater. Sci. Eng. A
[50] H. Aretz, R. Luce, M. Wolske, R. Kopp, M. Goerdeler, 2001, 309±310, 320.
V. Marx, G. Pomana, G. Gottstein, Model. Simul. Mater. [67] Y. Shim, L. E. Levine, R. Thomson, Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Sci. Eng. 2000, 8, 881. 2001, 309±310, 340.
[51] B. Peeters, M. Seefeldt, S. R. Kalidindi, P. Van Houtte, [68] R. Thomson, L. E. Levine, Y. Shim, Physica A 2000, 283,
E. Aernoudt, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2001, 319±321, 188. 307.
[52] B. Peeters, E. Hoferlin, P. Van Houtte, E. Aernoudt, Int. [69] J. H. Rose, J. R. Smith, J. Ferrante, Phys. Rev. B 1983, 28,
J. Plast. 2001, 17, 819. 1835.
[53] Z. Zhao, F. Roters, W. Mao, D. Raabe, Adv. Eng. Mater. [70] O. Nguyen, M. Ortiz, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, in press.
2001, 3, 984.
______________________