Lab 11 (Hardware Practice) PDF
Lab 11 (Hardware Practice) PDF
Lab 11 Manual
Speed Control of DC Shunt Motor
(Hardware practice)
Student Name:
Reg No:
Date:
Instructions:
➢ Complete all activities in lab and get checked by the lab engineer.
➢ Home task should be completed before next lab and must checked by the lab engineer.
➢ At the end of all activities and home task students advised to write a summary in their
own words.
➢ Late submission will lead to deduction of marks.
➢ Date must be properly mentioned.
Objective:
First Objective:
To observe the speed control of dc shunt motor in MATLAB Simulink by field flux control
method.
Second Objective:
To observe the speed control of dc shunt motor in MATLAB Simulink by terminal voltage
control method.
Background:
It is based on the fact that by varying the flux φ, the motor speed (N α 1/ φ) can be changed and
hence the name flux control method. In this method, a variable resistance (known as shunt field
rheostat) is placed in series with shunt field winding as shown in Fig A.
Fig. A
The shunt field rheostat reduces the shunt field current Ish and hence the flux f. Therefore, we
can only raise the speed of the motor above the normal speed as shown in sample graph Fig B.
Fig. B
Generally, this method permits to increase the speed in the ratio 3:1. Wider speed ranges tend to
produce instability and poor commutation.
Advantages
Disadvantages
(i) Only speeds higher than the normal speed can be obtained since the total field circuit
resistance cannot be reduced below Rsh—the shunt field winding resistance.
(ii) There is a limit to the maximum speed obtainable by this method. It is because if the flux is
too much weakened, commutation becomes poorer.
Fig. C Fig. D
N α V - Ia (Ra + RC )
where RC = controller resistance
Due to voltage drop in the controller resistance, the back e.m.f. (Eb) is decreased. Since N µ Eb,
the speed of the motor is reduced. The highest speed obtainable is that corresponding to RC = 0
i.e., normal speed. Hence, this method can only provide speeds below the normal speed (See Fig.
D).
Disadvantages
(i) A large amount of power is wasted in the controller resistance since it carries full armature
current Ia.
(ii) The speed varies widely with load since the speed depends upon the voltage drop in the
controller resistance and hence on the armature current demanded by the load.
(iii) The output and efficiency of the motor are reduced.
(iv) This method results in poor speed regulation.
In this method, the voltage source supplying the field current is different from that which
supplies the armature. This method avoids the disadvantages of poor speed regulation and low
efficiency as in armature control method. However, it is quite expensive. Therefore, this method
of speed control is employed for large size motors where efficiency is of great importance. Any
Speed the motor can be obtained by this method.