The Cooking Animal Final Draft
The Cooking Animal Final Draft
Stephenie Fortunata
English 100
“The Cooking Animal” by Michael Pollan talks about the importance of cooking and
how it has changed humans’ lives time after time. Among all the reading assignments, I love this
essay the most. I think the essay is effective to read because it has a well-organized structure and
provides a lot of accurate information that is supported with study research. The topic itself is
interesting and a must read for those who want to have a healthy diet life.
Pollan starts his writing with three quotes from a Scottish writer, James Boswell, a
All three of these men state that cooking culture is what sets humans apart from animals; from
the first paragraph, I can tell that Pollan has a strong, opinioned start. In the next two paragraphs,
he talks about the benefits of cooking from science and anthropology (culture) perspectives. He
mentions that cooking creates an occasion where people sit down, share, and enjoy their meals
together. Beside the benefits of cooking, Pollan also brings up a short history about outdoor
grilling and how people fit cooking into their weekend recreation activities. Shortly after that,
Pollan starts to introduce his opinion about cooking by mentioning a research study done by a
group of Harvard economists led by David Cutler showing relation between cooking preparation
at home and the increasing number of obese Americans. The study shows that the more time
Fortunata 2
spent on the food preparation, the lower the obesity rates. Pollan’s thesis statement is in the
beginning of the tenth paragraph, and it is supported with, in my opinion, with strong evidence
(various sources and a research study) in paragraph 7 - 9. After that, he provides the reader with
questions and his hopes on turning America’s eating habits around. Pollan ends his essay with a
solution to have a healthy diet based on Harry Balzer’s opinion, which is if you want to eat less,
From the little picture of the essay’s content, I can say that it’s one of a few good essays
with a well-organized structure. Pollan mentions some evidence before carefully stating his
opinion (thesis statement); then he introduces the problem and provides with a solution.
The cooking animal essay is enjoyable to read. It has a catchy hook that successfully
engages the audience with the topic and makes them want to know more about it. It makes me
feel related to the topic because I’m one of the people who are lazy to cook and consume too
much instant foods. And thank you to the writer’s clarity and use of simple vocabulary, so I can
Another thing that I recognize from this essay is the writer’s direct style of writing and
relaxed tone. From the beginning of the essay, he points out his main idea, focusing every
argument and every piece of evidence to directly address the main idea. Pollan doesn’t waste his
time on other things except trying to make people realize how important cooking is. However,
even though he’s being straight forward, he delivers his opinion in a relaxed tone. This is what I
like about him. He doesn’t make the atmosphere too serious and boring; in fact, he puts in some
funny sentences to lighten up the mood. For example, in the paragraph 13, he tells us that if we
had a dream to reform the American way of eating, then maybe it’s not a good idea to call Harry
Fortunata 3
Balzer, who has a negative point of view about changing Americans’ eating behaviors, right
away to discuss it. He also says that Harry Balzer is crusty as a fresh baguette in paragraph 16. I
believe with his friendly humorous tone, the reader will be delighted to keep reading and
Pollan’s target audience in his essay is American citizens. He states overall Americans’
eating habit, which means he doesn’t specify a specific group of people. The research study’s
samples he mentions are also Americans in general. Therefore, the target audience is everyone,
including himself. What’s more, Pollan’s essay effectively makes its point to the audience,
because of his well-organized structure. He also uses ‘we’ instead of ‘people’ or ‘they’ so that
From his well-written essay, I can take away two important points: (1) How Pollan makes
sense and strengthens his idea with evidence. The fact that Americans today consume a lot of
instant food because they’re too lazy to cook doesn’t surprise me because I go through this kind
of situation too, especially since no one cooks for me; also almost every day I eat instant food or
just grab a “to go” meal at supermarket. However, what I didn’t realize until I read the essay is
the more people don’t cook, the more they are likely to eat. At first, I didn’t really see the
connection between less cooking activities with frequency of eating, but then Pollan did a good
job on explaining the connection (described in paragraph 10). Now I understand why people who
spend less time in cooking eat more food. It is simply because instant foods (made by industries)
are cheap and easy to eat; therefore, people are likely to eat them every day. I love how he
supports his opinion by citing from various sources (such as Jean-Antgelme Brillat-Savarin,
Claude Levi-Strauss, and Harry Balzer) which can make the reader strongly agree with his point
of view. (2) Pollan’s writing style does affect readers. The way he delivering his intention makes
Fortunata 4
the reader concerned about the issues (eating habit, increasing rates of obesity). But he doesn’t
leave the readers hanging in curiosity, because then he provides a solution which is to follow a
healthy diet. He doesn’t force or say that the readers have to do exactly what he wants. He offers
I think the cooking animal essay has a good choice of topic because eating is one of our
daily needs, and things we eat do matter. Foods that are easy and quick to make are never good.
They contain massive amounts of sugar, fat, and salt! Therefore, spend some time to cook;
homemade foods are often more fit to our taste and made full of love.