Prevalence of Hypertension and Predictive Factors of Self Efficacy Among Elderly People With Hypertension in Institutional Based Rehabilitation in Indonesia (2) - Dikonversi
Prevalence of Hypertension and Predictive Factors of Self Efficacy Among Elderly People With Hypertension in Institutional Based Rehabilitation in Indonesia (2) - Dikonversi
cz
DOI: 10.32725/kont.2018.007
KONTAKT / Journal of nursing and social sciences related to health and illness
Abstract
Aim: Identification of hypertension factors among elderly people is expected to form appropriate nursing interventions to improve
the self-efficacy of patients by modifying factors affecting the blood pressure of elderly people with hypertension. The aim of this
study is to investigate the prevalence of hypertension and predictive factors of self-efficacy among elderly people with hypertension
in institution- based rehabilitation (IBR) in Indonesia.
Methods: An IBR cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 64 elderly people selected through random sampling. Research data
were collected using a structured questionnaire and standard protocol, employing a stethoscope and sphygmomanometer to measure
blood pressure. The data were then analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics, as well as multivariate linear regression
analyses.
Results: The prevalence of systolic and diastolic hypertension among elderly people who lived in the IBR were 31.30% and 45.30%,
respectively. The predictors of self-efficacy of the elderly with regard to systolic hypertension were spiritual activity, length of stay,
education, the occupation of the elderly before entering the rehabilitation, and dementia; while daily activities, risk of falling, pain,
and depression anxiety and stress become significant predictors of self-efficacy in elderly people with diastolic hypertension.
Conclusion: This study provides new evidence that signifies the current burden of hypertension and the critical factors of self-
efficacy for uncontrolled hypertension among the elderly in the IBR. The study suggests that health-promotion programs should be
developed to modify factors of hypertension among elders of IBR in Indonesia.
* Author for correspondence: Tantut Susanto, University of Jember, Faculty of Nursing, Department of Community,
Family, and Gerontic Health Nursing, Jl. Kalimantan 37, Jember, Jawa Timur, 68121 Indonesia; e-mail:
[email protected] http://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2018.007
4VCNJUUFE: h0ß8-05-03 t "DDFQUFE: h0ß8-ßß-0h t 1SFQVCMJTIFE POMJOF: h0ß9-0ß-ßß
,0/5",5 hß/ß: ß4ohß t &*44/ ß804-5ßhh t *44/ ßhßh-4ßß5 ª
h0ß9 5IF "VUIPST. 1VCMJTIFE CZ 6OJWFSTJUZ PG 4PVUI #PIFNJB JO ſFTLÏ #VEƩKPWJDF, 'BDVMUZ PG )FBMUI BOE 4PDJBM 4DJFODFT.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Susanto et al. / 15
KONTAKT
Table 1. Correlation between the characteristics of participants, health status and blood pressure (n = 64)
Variable Total Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood pressure
2
n (%) <150 mmHg >150 mmHg t/χ p-value ‹90 NN)H ›90 NN)H t/χ2 p-value
Age (year)
M ± SD 5ß.86 9.94 5ß.ßß 8.9Z 53.Z0 ßß.9h o0.889 0.378 70.43 ± 10.28 53.Z9 9.40 –1.271 0.208
Gender
Male 38 (Z9.40) h6 (Z9.ß0) 12 (60.00) 0.000 1.000 21 (60.00) 17 (58.60) 0.000 1.000
Female 26 (40.60) ß8 (40.90) 8 (40.00) 14 (40.00) 12 (41.40)
Length of stay (year)
M ± SD 3.70 ± 4.44 4.16 ± 5.17 2.70 ± 1.84 1.657 0.103 4.43 Z.Z9 2.83 ± 2.24 1.552 0.127
Ethnicity
Madura ß4 (hß.90) 9 (h0.Z0) 5 (25.00) 0.730 0.694 10 (28.60) 4 (13.80) 5.084 0.059
Jawa 44 (68.80) 30 (68.20) 14 (70.00) 20 (57.10) 24 (82.80)
Etc 6 (9.40) 5 (11.40) 1 (5.00) 5 (14.30) 1 (3.40)
Education
Did not attend 16 (25.00) 8 (18.20) 8 (40.00) 4.968 0.h9ß 9 (hZ.50) 7 (24.10) 0.771 0.94h
Elementary school 24 (37.50) ß8 (40.90) 6 (30.00) 14 (40.00) 10 (34.50)
Junior high school 8 (12.50) 5 (11.40) 3 (15.00) 4 (11.40) 4 (13.80)
Senior high school 13 (20.30) 10 (22.70) 3 (15.00) 7 (20.00) 6 (20.70)
University college 3 (4.70) 3 (6.80) 0 ß (h.90) h (6.90)
16 Susanto et al. / KONTAKT
Table 1 (Continued)
Variable Total Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood pressure
n (%) <150 mmHg >150 mmHg t/χ2 p-value ‹90 NN)H ›90 NN)H t/χ2 p-value
Occupation before entrance
1VCMJD HPWFSONFOU 3 (4.70) 3 (6.80) 0 3.5Z9 0.153 0 3 (10.30) 4.736 0.094
Enterpreneurship 13 (20.30) 11 (25.00) 2 (10.00) 9 (hZ.50) 4 (13.80)
Others 48 (75.00) 30 (68.20) ß8 (90.00) 26 (74.30) hh (5Z.90)
Marital status
Single 5 (ß0.90) 5 (ßZ.90) 0 4.9Z6 0.175 6 (17.10) 1 (3.40) 4.213 0.h39
Married 24 (37.50) 16 (36.40) 8 (40.00) 13 (37.10) ßß (35.90)
Divorced 6 (9.40) 5 (11.40) 1 (5.00) 4 (11.40) h (6.90)
Widowed 27 (42.20) 16 (36.40) 11 (55.00) 12 (34.30) 15 (51.70)
KATZ
0 Z8 (90.60) 40 (90.90) ß8 (90.00) h.5h9 0.435 3h (9ß.40) h6 (89.50) 2.076 0.557
1 4 (6.30) 3 (6.80) 1 (5.00) 2 (5.70) h (6.90)
2 1 (1.60) 0 1 (5.00) 0 1 (3.40)
4 1 (1.60) 1 (2.30) 0 ß (h.90) 0
41.42
1 28 (43.80) ß9 (43.h0) 9 (4Z.00) ß.988 0.575 16 (45.70) 12 (41.40) 4.646 0.200
2 17 (26.60) 11 (25.00) 6 (30.00) 7 (20.00) 10 (34.50)
3 15 (23.40) 10 (22.70) 5 (25.00) 8 (hh.90) 7 (24.10)
4 4 (6.30) 40 (9.ß0) 0 4 (11.40) 0
MMSE
1 15 (23.40) 10 (22.70) 5 (25.00) 0.388 0.824 7 (20.00) 8 (27.60) 1.800 0.407
2 16 (25.00) 12 (27.30) 4 (20.00) 11 (31.40) 5 (17.20)
3 33 (51.60) 22 (50.00) 11 (55.00) 17 (48.60) 16 (55.20)
"1("3 'BNJMZ
1 10 (15.60) 5 (ßZ.90) 3 (15.00) 0.063 0.969 6 (17.10) 4 (13.80) 0.h99 0.861
2 21 (32.80) 14 (31.80) 7 (35.00) 12 (34.30) 9 (3ß.00)
3 33 (51.60) 23 (52.30) 10 (50.00) 17 (48.60) 16 (55.20)
BDS
1 ß9 (h9.50) ß3 (h9.Z0) 6 (30.00) 3.710 0.h94 11 (31.40) 8 (27.60) 0.642 0.887
2 22 (34.40) ßh (h9.Z0) 9 (4Z.00) 11 (31.40) ßß (35.90)
3 17 (26.60) 12 (27.30) 5 (25.00) 9 (hZ.50) 8 (27.60)
4 6 (9.40) 6 (13.60) 0 4 (11.40) h (6.90)
Mini cognitive
0 5 (7.80) 5 (11.40) 0 h.9ZZ 0.228 32 (8.60) h (6.90) 0.331 0.847
1 15 (23.40) 11 (25.00) 4 (20.00) 9 (hZ.50) 6 (20.70)
2 44 (68.80) 28 (63.60) 16 (80.00) 23 (65.70) 21 (72.40)
DSES
1 5 (ß0.90) 5 (ßZ.90) 0 4.Z93 0.101 5 (14.30) h (6.90) 3.756 0.153
2 ß9 (h9.50) 14 (31.80) 5 (25.00) 13 (37.10) 6 (20.70)
3 38 (Z9.40) 23 (52.30) 15 (75.00) 17 (48.60) 21 (72.40)
Self-efficacy
M ± SD h5.88 6.Z9 27.34 ± 6.42 h9.0Z 6.96 o0.96h 0.340 h5.ßß 6.ß9 h8.59 5.03 –1.015 0.314
DASS 42
M ± SD hZ.98 h0.0Z h6.36 ß9.33 25.15 ± 22.05 0.223 0.824 hZ.49 ß9.83 h6.Z9 h0.64 –0.217 0.8h9
DASS 14
M ± SD 9.08 8.08 ß0.h3 8.98 6.ZZ 4.9Z 2.104 0.040a 9.69 9.ßh 8.34 ± 6.70 0.658 0.513
NRS
0 27 (42.20) ß9 (43.h0) 8 (40.00) 1.142 0.767 14 (40.00) 13 (44.80) 0.983 0.805
1 24 (37.50) 17 (38.60) 7 (35.00) 13 (37.10) ßß (35.90)
2 12 (18.80) 5 (ßZ.90) 5 (25.00) 7 (20.00) 5 (17.20)
3 1 (1.60) 1 (2.30) 0 ß (h.90) 0
MORSE
1 26 (40.60) ß8 (40.90) 8 (40.00) ß.9Z8 0.376 12 (34.30) 14 (48.30) 8.348 0.015b
2 hZ (39.ß) ß9 (43.h0) 6 (30.00) ß9 (Z4.30) 6 (20.70)
3 13 (20.30) 5 (ßZ.90) 6 (30.00) 4 (11.40) 9 (3ß.00)
Table 2. Factors which influenced self-efficacy of the elderly people with systolic hypertension in a nursing home (n = 20)
Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 .PEFM 9
Marital status –
MORSE 0.099
"1("3 0.773 0.59ß
MMSE –0.606 o0.609 –0.461
DASS 14 –0.080 –0.076 –0.110 –0.118
Gender –4.048 –4.087 –4.201 –4.264 o3.89h
DASS 42 –0.075 –0.075 –13.437 –0.065 –0.084 –0.044
Ethnicity –7.014 –7.042 o5.ßß9 –7.048 –6.607 –5.657 –5.877
BDS 5.603 5.623 Z.Z90 5.484 6.070 5.657 5.168 3.272
KATZ ß6.Z09 16.644 16.172 15.700 16.226 11.668 10.072 5.728 6.110
Age 0.h69 0.272 0.241 0.234 0.248 0.ß9ß 0.202 0.241 0.217
NRS oß3.890 oß3.9ß5 –13.437 –13.108 –13.466a oß0.Z93a oß0.495a –7.012 oZ.950
41.42 –13.461 –13.563 oß3.098 –13.060 –12.686 o9.h83a o9.ßZ4a –7.018 –6.677
DESS 5.099 7.163 7.386 7.245 6.661 4.876 4.810 4.881 6.430a
Length of stay 1.452 1.455 ß.449 1.431 1.348 1.741 ß.95Za h.039a 2.354a
Education oß0.49Z –10.547 –10.234 –10.144a o9.9ßßa –10.336b –10.341b –10.217b –11.070b
Occupation before entrance –20.714 oh0.569 –10.234 oh0.h39a oß9.4Z0a –18.881b oß9.5h9b –20.130b –21.162b
Mini Cog oßh.539 oßh.569 –12.704 –12.658 –12.474 oß8.h90b oß9.804b –17.415b –18.211b
R Square 0.89ß 0.89ß 0.89ß 0.890 0.889 0.875 0.869 0.823 0.59Z
Constant 76.016 76.154 55.Z59 77.554 73.532 67.415 66.856 Zß.594 56.407
Discussion
Prevalence of hypertension among the elderly
in institution-based rehabilitation
The current study found that the prevalence of systolic and di-
astolic hypertension among the elderly is low compared to the
hypertension of elderly people in Shanghai (Yang et al., 2017),
although the prevalence of elders with hypertension is higher
UIBO JO UIF *OEPOFTJBO CBTJD IFBMUI TVSWFZ (#BEBO 1FOFMJUJBO
EBO 1FOHFNCBOHBO ,FTFIBUBO, h0ß3). ɥF EJêFSFODF JO
IZ-
istics of the elderly people. The current research setting was
an institution-based rehabilitation centre in Indonesia; it is a
unit owned by the Social Service and Social Welfare, which
is limited in health service management because the main
focus of the activity is the daily social activities of the
elderly people. This will affect the health problems of the
elderly people. The results of this study are also consistent
with previous research, suggesting that institutionalization
of the elderly contributes to various problems of those
living in nursing homes (Som- bateyotha et al., 2016).
Therefore, modification of the form of nursing action of
the institutionalized elderly persons should focus on
enhancing their self-efficacy to control blood pres- sure, so
that hypertension among the elders can be compre-
hensively and holistically managed.
Constant hß.469 21.517 22.620 23.020 h4.9ß4 25.310 27.423 27.718 24.216 27.510 23.414 ß9.h08 22.150
Ethical clearance
The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee
Review Board of Indonesia of the Faculty of Nursing,
University of Jember.
Souhrn
Cíl: *EFOUJëLBDF GBLUPSDž IZQFSUFO[F V TUBSÝÓDI MJEÓ CZ NƩMB WZUWPƻJU WIPEOÏ PÝFUƻPWBUFMTLÏ JOUFSWFODF QSP [MFQÝFOÓ ÞSPWOƩ OF-
[ÈWJTMPTUJ QBDJFOUDž QPNPDÓ NPEJëLBDF GBLUPSDž, LUFSÏ PWMJWƶVKÓ LSFWOÓ UMBL V TFOJPSDž T IZQFSUFO[Ó. $ÓMFN UÏUP TUVEJF KF WZÝFUƻJU
QSFWBMFODJ IZQFSUFO[F B QSFEJLUJWOÓ GBLUPSZ OF[ÈWJTMPTUJ V TUBSÝÓDI MJEÓ T IZQFSUFO[Ó W JOTUJUVDJPOÈMOÓ SFIBCJMJUBDJ (*#3) W
*OEPOÏTJJ. Metodika: #ZMB QSPWFEFOB QSDžƻF[PWÈ TUVEJF *#3 [BISOVKÓDÓ 64 OÈIPEOƩ WZCSBOâDI TUBSÝÓDI MJEÓ. ÁEBKF [ Wâ[LVNV CZMZ
TISPNÈäEƩ- OZ QPNPDÓ TUSVLUVSPWBOÏIP EPUB[OÓLV B TUBOEBSEOÓIP QSPUPLPMV, QPNPDÓ TUFUPTLPQV B TGZHNPNBOPNFUSV QSP
NƩƻFOÓ LSFWOÓIP UMBLV. %BUB CZMB QPUÏ BOBMZ[PWÈOB QPNPDÓ EFTLSJQUJWOÓ B TSPWOÈWBDÓ TUBUJTUJLZ, TUFKOƩ KBLP NVMUJWBSJBƦOÓ MJOFÈSOÓ
SFHSFTOÓ BOBMâ[Z.
Výsledky: 1SFWBMFODF TZTUPMJDLÏ B EJBTUPMJDLÏ IZQFSUFO[F V TUBSÝÓDI QBDJFOUDž, LUFƻÓ äJMJ W *#3, ƦJOJMB 3ß,30 % B 4Z,30 %. 1SFEJLUPSZ
OF[ÈWJTMPTUJ TUBSÝÓDI PTPC T PIMFEFN OB TZTUPMJDLPV IZQFSUFO[J CZMZ EVDIPWOÓ BLUJWJUZ, EÏMLB QPCZUV, W[EƩMÈOÓ, [BNƩTUOÈOÓ TUBS-
ÝÓDI PTPC QƻFE SFIBCJMJUBDÓ B EFNFODF, [BUÓNDP EFOOÓ BLUJWJUZ, SJ[JLP QÈEV, CPMFTU B EFQSFTF, Þ[LPTU B TUSFT TF TUÈWBKÓ
Wâ[OBNOâNJ QSFEJLUPSZ OF[ÈWJTMPTUJ V TUBSÝÓDI MJEÓ T EJBTUPMJDLPV IZQFSUFO[Ó.
Závěr: 5BUP TUVEJF QPTLZUVKF OPWÏ EDžLB[Z, LUFSÏ QPVLB[VKÓ OB TPVƦBTOÏ [BUÓäFOÓ [QDžTPCFOÏ IZQFSUFO[Ó B LSJUJDLÏ GBLUPSZ OF[ÈWJT-
MPTUJ QSP OFLPOUSPMPWBOPV IZQFSUFO[J NF[J TUBSÝÓNJ QBDJFOUZ W *#3. 4UVEJF OB[OBƦVKF, äF CZ QSPHSBNZ QPEQPSZ [ESBWÓ NƩMZ CâU
WZWJOVUZ UBL, BCZ NPEJëLPWBMZ GBLUPSZ IZQFSUFO[F V TUBSÝÓDI QBDJFOUDž W *#3 W *OEPOÏTJJ.
References
ß. "O /, 1BSL *4 (h0ß6). ɥF &êFDU PG )FBMUI -JUFSBDZ BOE
4FMG-
efficacy on Treatment Adherence of Hypertensive Elders.
Indian
+ 4DJ 5FDIOPM 9. %0*: ß0.ß548Z/JKTU/h0ß6/W9JhZ/95h0Z.
h. #BEBO 1FOFMJUJBO EBO 1FOHFNCBOHBO ,FTFIBUBO (h0ß3). 3JTFU
Kesehatan Dasar. Jakarta.
3. #FDL "., 8BSE $), .FOEFMTPO ., .PDL +, &SCBVHI + (ß96ß).
"O JOWFOUPSZ GPS NFBTVSJOH EFQSFTTJPO. "SDI (FO 1TZDIJBUSZ
ß: Z6ßoZ5ß. %0*: ß0.ß0ß5/$#0958ßß054ßZ3h4.004.
4. #PSTPO 4, 4DBOMBO +., $IFO 1, (BOHVMJ . (h003). ɥF .JOJ-
Cog as a screen for dementia: Validation in a population-
based sample. J Am Geriatr Soc 51: 1451–1454.
5. Crellin NE, Orrell M, McDermott O, Charlesworth G (2014).
Self-efficacy and health-related quality of life in family carers of
people with dementia: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health
ß8: 9Z4o969. %0*: ß0.ß080/ß3605863.h0ß4.9ßZ9hß.
6. Currie G, Delles C (2018). Blood pressure targets in
UIF FMEFSMZ. + )ZQFSUFOT 36: h34oh36. %0*:
ß0.ß095/ HJH.0000000000001576.
5. %PVHMBT #., )PXBSE &1 (h0ßZ). 1SFEJDUPST PG TFMG-NBOBHFNFOU
CFIBWJPST JO PMEFS BEVMUT XJUI IZQFSUFOTJPO. "EW 1SFW .FE
"SUJDMF *%: 960h63. %0*: ß0.ßßZZ/h0ßZ/960h63.
8. &MEFS ,, 3BNBNPOKJBSJWFMP ;, 8JMUTIJSF +, 1JQFS $, )PSO
and hypertension control in Southern African American
NFO. "N + 1VCMJD )FBMUI ß0h: hh4hohh4Z. %0*:
ß0.hß0Z/ "+1).h0ßh.300555.
9. &PN 40, -FF * (h0ß5). ɥF &êFDU PG )FBMUI $PBDIJOH 1SPHSBNT
on Self-Efficacy, Health Behaviors, and Quality of Life in
)ZQFSUFOTJWF 1FPQMF -JWJOH JO 1PWFSUZ. + ,PSFBO "DBE /VST 45:
380. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.380.
ß0. 'SJFECFSH +1, 3PESJHVF[ .", 8BUTVMB .&, -JO *, 8ZMJF-3PTFUU +,
"MMFHSBOUF +1, FU BM. (h0ßZ). &êFDUJWFOFTT PG B UBJMPSFE
CFIBWJPSBM JOUFSWFOUJPO UP JNQSPWF IZQFSUFOTJPO DPOUSPM:
1SJNBSZ
outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Hypertension 65:
440o446. %0*: ß0.ßß6ß/):1&35&/4*0/")".ßß4.03483.
11. Harmell AL, Mausbach BT, Roepke SK, Moore R, Känel
3, 1BUUFSTPO 5-, FU BM. (h0ßß). ɥF 3FMBUJPOTIJQ
CFUXFFO self-efficacy and resting blood pressure in
Spousal "M[IFJNFS’T $BSFHJWFST. #S + )FBMUI 1TZDIPM ß6:
3ß5o3h8.
%0*: ß0.ß348/ß3Z9ß05ß09Z0493h.
ßh. )FMMTUSÚN ,, 4BOETUSÚN ., )FJEFLFO 8ÌHFSU 1, 4BOECPSHI
.,
Söderlund A, Thors Adolfsson E, Johansson A-Ch
(2013). Fall-related self-efficacy in instrumental
activities of daily living is associated with falls in older
community- MJWJOH QFPQMF. 1IZT 0DDVQ ɥFS (FSJBUS 3ß:
ßh8oß39.
%0*: ß0.3ß09/0h503ß8ß.h0ß3.59h9ßh.
13. Irwan AM, Kato M, Kitaoka K, Ueno E, Tsujiguchi H,
Shogenji M (2016). Development of the salt-reduction and
efficacy-maintenance program in Indonesia. Nurs Heal Sci
18: Zß9oZ3h. %0*: ß0.ßßßß/OIT.ßh30Z.
Susanto et al. / 21
KONTAKT