0% found this document useful (0 votes)
375 views9 pages

Cavite State University: Don Severino de Las Alas Campus

This document provides information about a course on Philosophical Foundations of Education offered at Cavite State University. The 3-sentence summary is: The course introduces students to major philosophies in education by emphasizing the basic teachings of great educational philosophers and involving critical analysis of how these philosophies relate to classroom instruction and management. It aims to help students understand the meaning and branches of philosophy and their relationship to education, trace the history of educational philosophies, and evaluate different school philosophies based on factors like perceived roles and curriculum. The course outcomes are for students to explain, trace, and evaluate various philosophies and their implications for education.

Uploaded by

Irene Dulay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
375 views9 pages

Cavite State University: Don Severino de Las Alas Campus

This document provides information about a course on Philosophical Foundations of Education offered at Cavite State University. The 3-sentence summary is: The course introduces students to major philosophies in education by emphasizing the basic teachings of great educational philosophers and involving critical analysis of how these philosophies relate to classroom instruction and management. It aims to help students understand the meaning and branches of philosophy and their relationship to education, trace the history of educational philosophies, and evaluate different school philosophies based on factors like perceived roles and curriculum. The course outcomes are for students to explain, trace, and evaluate various philosophies and their implications for education.

Uploaded by

Irene Dulay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

VPAA-QF-10

CvSU Vision Republic of the Philippines CvSU Mission


The premier university in Cavite State University shall provide
historic Cavite recognized for
CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY excellent, equitable and relevant educational
excellence in the development Don Severino de las Alas Campus opportunities in the arts, science and
of globally competitive and Indang, Cavite technology through quality instruction and
morally upright individuals. relevant research and development activities.
It shall produce professional, skilled and
morally upright individuals for global
competitiveness.

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

COURSE SYLLABUS
First Semester, AY 2020-21

Philosophical
Course
EDUC 201 Course Title Foundations of Type Lecture Credit Units 3 Units
Code
Education
Presents the major philosophies with emphasis on education and its processes. It also focuses on the basic teachings of great
educational philosophers. It involves critical discourse and analysis of these philosophies in relation to the conduct of classroom
Course
Description instruction and educational management.

Lecture: 0700 – 1000;


Pre-
None Course Schedule Saturday
requisites
Core Students are expected to live by and stand for the following University tenets:
Values TRUTH is demonstrated by the student’s objectivity and honesty during examinations, class activities and in the development of
projects.
EXCELLENCE is exhibited by the students’ self-confidence, punctuality, diligence and commitment in the assigned tasks, class
performance and other course requirements.
SERVICE is manifested by the students’ respect, rapport, fairness and cooperation in dealing with their peers and members of the
community.
In addition, they should exhibit love and respect for nature and support for the cause of humanity.

V02-2020-06-01
The College of Education shall endeavor to achieve the following goals:
1. Offering of varied undergraduate and graduate degree courses leading to various professions that will cater to the needs of the
society;
2. Offering short-term courses that will directly benefit the client system;
Goals of
3. Improvement of student performance
the College/
4. Improvement of facilities for both students and facilitators of learning;
Campus
5. Strengthening of linkage between research and the client system;
6. Conduct community development services to the different clienteles.

The Teacher Education Department shall endeavor to accomplish the following objectives:
1. provide relevant and quality course offering in the graduate and undergraduate levels to improve student performance;
Objectives 2. conduct relevant researches in the different areas in education to enrich the learning process;
of the 3. conduct relevant community services to disseminate information and technologies to target clienteles to improve their well-being;
Department 4. publish research journals and other related publications to disseminate relevant information; and
produce instructional materials to improve student performance.

Program Educational Objectives (based on the program CMO)


The Master of Arts in Education (MAEd) – major in Educational Management aims to attain the following objectives:
1. update and enrich teacher’s content knowledge in Educational Management
2. enhance and expand teacher’s theoretical and technical knowledge for teaching Educational Management; and
3. develop the teachers’ research capabilities for replicating, verifying, validating, contextualizing, and/or applying theoretical and practical knowledge
about the different aspects of the educational process

Student Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives


Program Educational
Objectives Code (based
Program/Student Outcomes (based on the program CMO)
on the program CMO)
1 2 3
Ability to explain the meaning of philosophy, its branches and their relationship to education and to other √ √ √
a.
fields.
b. Ability to trace the history and origin of philosophy √ √ √
Ability to explain major ideas of philosophies as they relate a) education; b) role of the school; c) curriculum; d) √ √ √
c.
teaching learning process; e) role of teacher; and f) students
d. Ability to evaluate the philosophy of their respective schools as manifested in their : a) perceived role of the √ √ √
school; b) role of the teacher; c) role of the students; d) implemented curriculum; e) teaching learning process;
f) faculty and staff development program; g) physical facilities development; and h) research and community

V02-2020-07-01
involvement
e. Ability to conduct research in philosophy as it relates to educational management √ √ √
Ability critique the different strengths and weaknesses of the different philosophies and the contributions of the √ √ √
f. different philosophers

g. Ability to write reflection papers and educational philosophy √ √ √


Course Outcomes and Relationship to Student Outcomes
Program/Student Outcomes Code
Program Outcomes Addressed by the Course
After completing this course, the students will be able to:
a b c d e f g
1. explain the relationship between philosophy, its branches
E E E E E E
and their relationship to education and other fields.
2. trace the history and origin of educational philosophies E E E E
3. explain the different philosophies as they relate to a)
education; b) role of the school; c) curriculum; d) teaching E E E E E E
learning process; e) role of teacher; and f) students
4. evaluate the philosophy of their school systems in relation
to their a) perceived role of the school; b) role of the teacher;
c) role of the students; d) implemented curriculum; e)
E D E E E D E
teaching learning process; f) faculty and staff development
program; g) physical facilities development; and h) research
and community involvement
5. conduct researches related to educational management D E D D D D
6. critique the different educational philosophy E E E
7. write reflection papers and their respective educational
D D D D D D D
philosophy
*Level : I-Introductory E- Enabling D-Demonstrative

COURSE COVERAGE
Resources Due
Mode of Outcomes-
Week Topic Teaching and Needed Date of
Intended Learning Delivery based
No. Learning Submis
Outcomes (ILO) Assessment
Activities (TLA) sion of
(OBA)
Output
After the A. Overview and Discussion Synchronous Texbooks Recitation Third
completion of the Introduction to the Class presentation Asynchronous Modules Reflection paper Week

V02-2020-07-01
1-3 lessons, the course: Research Articles Group output
students will 1. V and M of the Critiquing Internet Facilities
be able to: University. Group discussion
1. explain the 2. Goals and
VMGO of the
objectives of the
University and the
College of program
Education; 3. GAD issues
2. discuss the 4. Orientation on the
conduct of conduct of research
research in relation and case study
to the course; 5. Overview of the
3. explain the course
meaning and B. The field of
importance of Philosophy
philosophy;
1. Definition,
4. discuss the
different branches branches, and
of philosophy; importance of
5. explain the philosophy
relationship of 2. Relationship of
philosophy to the philosophy and
different areas in education,
education; curriculum,
6. trace the history methodology of
of philosophy; and instruction, teacher
7. develop a
and learner.
personal
philosophy in 3. History of
education philosophy
4. A personal philosophy
of education
After the C. Different Philosophies Discussion Synchronous Texbooks Recitation 4-8 week
completion of the and their Relation to Class presentation Asynchronous Modules Reflection paper
4-8 lessons, students Education Research Articles Group output
will be able to: 1. Idealism Critiquing Internet Facilities
1. differentiate the Group discussion
2. Realism
different
philosophies of 3. Pragmatism

V02-2020-07-01
education; 4. Existentialism and
2. explain the Phenomenology
influences of the 5. Perennialism and
different Essentialism
educational
6. Progresivism and
philosophies to the
different areas in Constructivism
education 7. Social
3.critique the Reconstructivism
different 8. Behaviorism
philosophies of 9. Marxism
education
After the D. Philosophers of Discussion Synchronous Texbooks Recitation 9-13
completion of the Different Ages Class presentation Asynchronous Modules Reflection paper week
9-13 lessons, students 1. Plato Research Articles Group output
should be able to: 2. Aristotle Critiquing Internet Facilities
1. Explain the Group discussion
3. Augustine
contributions of the
different 4. Aquinas
philosphers to the 5. Francis Bacon
development in 6. Rene Descartes
education 7. John Locke
2. Critique the 8. Jean Jackques
contributions of the Rousseau
different 9. Johann Henrich
philosophers to the Pestalozzi
field of education 10. Friedrich Froebel
11. John Dewey
12. Jean Piaget

After the E. Conduct and Class presentation Synchronous Completed 17th


completion of the presenatation of research Asynchronous research week
14-17 project, students output
should be able to:
1. write a research
related to the
course
2. present to the

V02-2020-07-01
class the
completed
research

Final Examination Asynchronous Passing the final 18th


18 examination week
COURSE REQUIREMENTS

1. Passing the Final Examinations


2. Individual Research Project
3. Critique Paper
4. Educational Philosophy
5. Individual Class Presentation
6. Class Participation
7. Class attendance

GRADING SYSTEM

Examinations 30%
Other Requirements 70%
Total 100%

Examinations (50% passing)


Final Exam 30%
Other Requirements:
Individual Research Project 25%
Critique Paper/
Educational Philosophy 20%
Class Presentation 15%
Class Participation 5%
Attendance 5%

V02-2020-07-01
STANDARD TRANSMUTATION TABLE FOR ALL COURSES

96.7 – 100.0 1.00


93.4 – 96.6 1.25
90.1 - 93.30 1.50
86.7 – 90.0 1.75
83.4 – 86.6 2.00
80.1 – 83.3 2.25
76.7 – 80.0 2.50
73.4 – 76.6 2.75
70.00 – 73.3 3.00
50.0-69.9 4.00
Below 50 5.00
INC Passed the course but lack some requirements.
Dropped If unexcused absence is at least 20% of the Total Class Hours.
Total Class Hours/Semester: 54 hrs
CLASS POLICIES
A. Attendance
Students are not allowed to have 20% or more unexcused absences of the total face to face class hours; otherwise, they will be graded as
“DROPPED”.

B. Class Decorum

During distance mode


Students are required to:
1. sign an honor system pledge;
2. avoid giving or receiving unauthorized aid of any kind on their examinations, papers, projects and assignments,
3. observe proper netiquette during on-line activities, and
4. submit take home assignments on time.

C. Examination/ Evaluation
1. Final Examinations is scheduled.
2. Cheating is strictly prohibited. A student who is caught cheating will be given a score of ”0” for the first offense. For the second
offense, the student will be automatically given a failing grade in the subject.

V02-2020-07-01
3. Students who will miss final examination, or a class project may be excused and allowed to take a special exam, or pass a class
project for any of the following reasons:
a. due to illness or death in the family; and
b. due to force majeure or natural calamities.

D. A student is expected to know and practice the ethical consideration in conducting research

REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS


References
Ball, Terence and Richard Dagger (2006). Ideals and Ideologies: Pearson Education; San Francisco USA.
Bauzon, Priscillano T. (1994) Fundamental Philosophies of Education; National Book Store, Mandaluyong City.
Callahan, Joseph F and Leonard H. Clark ( 1997). Foundations of Education; McMillan Publishing Co. Inc. New York.
Dunn, Shella (2005) Philosophical Foundations of Education: Pearson Education; San Francisco USA
Donald Butler J. (1968). Four Philosophies and Their Practice in Education and Religion; Harper and Row Publisher, New York.
Gutek, Gerald L. (1997). Philosophical and Ideological Perspectives on Education; Allyn and Bacon, Boston USA.
Mcnergney, Robert and Joanne M. Herbert (1995). Foundations of Education. Allyn and Bacon, Boston USA
Moore, T.W. (1982) ; Philosophy of Education; Routledge and Kegan Paul ‘ London
Ornstein Allan et al (2011) Foundations of Education; Wadsworth’ Australia
Ozmon, Howard A. and Samuel M. Craver (1992). Philosophical Foundations of Education; Prentice Hall; Ohio
Sober Elliott (1995). Core Questions in Philosophy . Prentice Hall, New jersey USA

Supplementary Readings/ Articles for Critiquing


To be provided later

REVISION HISTORY
Revision
Date of Revision Date of Implementation Highlights of Revision
Number
4 September 10, 2020 First Semester, 2020-2021 Format and Content

Prepared by: Evaluated by: Approved:

ISAIAS A. BANAAG, EdD EVELYN F. GRUESO REZIN Z. BAHIA


Professor Department Chairperson Dean
CP # 09194760378 Department of Teacher Education College/Campus OGS-OLC
E-mail Address [email protected] E-mail Address: Date Approved: ________________________
Department of Teacher Education Date Evaluated:

V02-2020-07-01
Consultation Schedule: Friday: 1300-1500
Date Prepared: September 10, 2020

V02-2020-07-01

You might also like