P.O.

BOX 31537 DUBAI - UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

Tel.: +971-4-2200356, Fax: +971-4-2200363

MALAYSIA PAVILION DUBAI

2020
DUBAI - UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

MALAYSIA GOVERNMENT

KING POST PILE SHORING REPORT

REV. NO.: 0
18-Nov-19

PROJECT REFERENCE : P-142/19/DXB

PREPARED BY APPROVED BY
NAME : ARVE CRUZ NAME :
DESIGNATION : DESIGN/ TECHNICAL MANAGER DESIGNATION :
DATE : 18.11.2019 DATE :

SIGNATURE : SIGNATURE :

REVISION NO. DATE MODIFICATION

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SR. NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE

1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 GENERAL
1.2 SCOPE

2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 2

2.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

3. MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS 3

3.1 CONCRETE
3.2 STRUCTURAL STEEL

4 OTHER DESIGN PARAMETERS 4-6

4.1 GROUND CHARACTERIZATION
4.2 LOADS TYPE ACTING ON WALL
4.3 EXCAVATION AND DEWATERING
4.4 DESIGN OF RETAINING WALL

5 SHORING ANALYSIS PROGRAM 7-21

REWARD ANALYSIS

6 DESIGN CALCULATION 22-24

STEEL BEAM SECTION
CONCRETE PANEL

7 APPENDIX 25-29

SOIL REPORT
SHOP DRAWING
1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General
Anmol Piling & Steel Structures LLC. have prepared the present document concerning the
project of the Malaysia Pavilion Dubai 2020 to provide below ground area shoring for the
preparation and construction of basement structure.

This preliminary design report presents the design parameters, design criteria and
methodologies proposed to be adopted for the structural design of temporary retaining
wall.

1.2 Scope
The scope includes the design of the temporary retaining wall (KING POST SHORING) while
construction of basement structure work proceeded.

CASE OF EXCAVATION CONSIDERED AND MODEL FOR ANALYSIS

CASE 1:
The Maximum Excavation Level is -5.00m from Existing Ground Level = +0.00 m. Spacing of
steel beams is 2.00m center to center spacing.

PAGE #1/29
2 DESIGN PARAMETERS

2.1 Reference Documents

Where relevant, the data and assumptions provided in the present document refer to the
following Codes for Structural Design and their National Annexes.

The structure will be designed on the British Standard:

Concrete
BS 8110-1:1997 Structural use of concrete - Code of practice and design and
construction

Steel
BS 5950-1:200
Structural use of steel work in building - Code of practice for design.

Foundations
British Codes
BS 8004:2015 Code of practice for foundations
BS 8002:1994 Earth retaining structures
Ciria Codes
Ciria C580 Embedded retaining wall - Guidance for economic design

Guides, Books, Papers:

Tomlinson, M.J. 1994 Pile design and construction
ICE 1996 Specification for Piling and Embedded Retaining Walls
Geotechnical Investigation Report by Matrix Laboratory LLC., Report No.: XSD/15-0143,
Dated September 15, 2015.

PAGE #2/29
3 MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS

3.1 Concrete
Concrete Panel
Concrete Class 25
Modulus of Elasticity = 25000 MPa.
Characteristic compressive strenth @ 28 days: fcu = 25 MPa.

3.2 Structural Steel

S355 Structural Steel
Young Modulus = 210000 MPa.
Design Strength py: = 355 MPa.

Steel Bars
Young Modulus = 200000 MPa.
Design Strength py: = 460 MPa.

PAGE #3/29
4 OTHER DESIGN PARAMETERS

4.1 Ground Characterization

The data of soil and recommendation provided by Technical Laboratory for Matrix Laboratory LLC.,
Report No.: XSD/15-0143, Dated September 15, 2015 will be used and modeled in the design with
respect to our desk study for the parameters of soil.
Geotechnical borings drilled inside the site indicates that the subsurface stratigraphy is relatively
uniform.
Soil properties of individual layes for the design are shown on the table below:
Table 1. NEAREST BOREHOLE BH-B25

Elevation Soil Types γ γsub. φ

3
m. Principle Constituent & Relative Density [kN/m .] [kN/m3.] [deg.]

Medium Dense Sand - Light brown, gravelly,

silty, medium to fine SAND. Gravel are
+0.00 17 19.5 33
subangular medium to fine sandstone
pieces.
Very Dense Sand - Light brown, gravelly,
silty, medium to fine SAND. Gravel are
-1.00 19 20.5 38
subangular medium to fine sandstone
pieces.ine sandstone pieces.
Weak Rock - Extremely weak to very weak,
light brown, medium to fine grained
calcareous SANDSTONE, partially to distinctly
-2.00 20.2 20.5 38
weathered, fractures are extremely close to
closely spaced and interbedded with
cemented sand.
Below of this elevation same class of soil to be considered with cohesion value of 20 kPa.
upto -12.00m. for conservative design.
Ground water was encountered in all boreholes at the highest depth of -14.00m below ground level as
per Technical Lab.
The SPT N values is linearly increasing with depth. The angle of internal friction is chosen
conservatively according to soil report and based on our desk study.
The soil strata and the corresponding properties may be traced easily from programme data as given
in REWARD Analysis output result.

PAGE #4/29
4.2 Loads Type Acting on Wall
Design surcharge applied at empty plot is 20 kN/m2 and to be set at Existing Ground Level.

4.3 Excavation and Dewatering

The maximum retained height adopted in the design of king post wall as mention in Item 1 of this
A.
report with accidental overdig of 10% of total height.
Take note that this type of retaining wall system is not a water tight therefore the level of ground
B.
water behind the retaining wall was considered same as infront of retaining wall.

PAGE #5/29
4.4 Design of Retaining Wall
The earth pressure coefficients are based on Coulomb for the at-rest, active and passive states and
the method used and choose the depth of embedment with partial factor is a Strength Factor
Method. Horizontal earth pressures for the stabilty analysis are obtained from Reward Analysis
program.
The stabilty for Factor Safety is 1.5 is used to determine the critical embedment length.

CASE OF SHORING ANALYSIS HAS BEEN CONSIDERED:

DESIGN OF CANTILEVER KING POST PILE SHORING FOR MAXIMUM EXCAVATION LEVEL OF -
CASE 1:
5.00m FROM EGL. +0.00m.

Cantilever king post shoring was adopted as the most cost-effective solution for this boundary. This
wall consist of steel section UB 457x191x74 kg/m or equivalent section with 4.00 meter embedment
depth below bulk excavation level to accommodate the lateral pressure by soil and surcharge loading.

Table 2.
Bending Moment, Shear Force & Deflection of individual sections for the design are shown on the
table below:

Service Spacing Maximum Average

Section Bending Moment [m.] Bending Moment Deflection
[kN.m./m.] [kN.m.] [cm.]
1 -151.30 2.00 453.90 2.40

The Factor of Safety produced and resulted in The Reward Analysis is equal to SF= 677%,
therefore the embedment length is suitable for the excavation depth.

4.5 Factor of Safety

A. King Post Wall
Factor on Embedment = > 1.5 (Ciria Report 104)
Factor on Moment & Shear = > 1.5 (BS 8002:1994)

PAGE #6/29
REWARD ANALYSIS
SHORING ANALYSIS PROGRAMME

PAGE #7/29
 Anmol Piling & Steel Structures LLC. Page no 1
Job no P-142
Engineer A.C.
Revision
Date 18/11/2019
Checked
Malaysia Pavillion
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-
©1992-2003 Geocentrix Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Construction Stages
Name Term Objects present in this stage
Case 1, Max. Short UB 457X191X74 kg/m, L=9.00m, S=2.00m
Retained Height= On retained side: Existing Ground Level, General Borehole, Surcharge 20kPa.,
5.00m. On excavated side: Max. Excavation Level= 5.00 m. , General Borehole,

Ground Profiles
Name Type Other Properties
Existing Ground Horizontal
Level

Excavations
Name Type Depth Plan Plan Other Properties
(m) length breadth
(m) (m)
Max. Excavation Horizontal 5.00 - -
Level= 5.00 m.

Soils
Name Type Class State Other Properties

Soil 1 Sand Unclassified Medium dense

Soil 2 Sand Unclassified Very dense
Soil 3 Rock Weathered rock Unspecified

Soil properties
Name Wet weight Dry weight Failure state Friction Cohesion Poisson's
kN/m^3 kN/m^3 ° kPa ratio
Soil 1 19.5 17.0 Peak 33.0 0.0 0.35
Soil 2 20.5 19.0 Peak 38.0 0.0 0.30
Soil 3 20.5 20.2 Peak 38.0 20.0 0.30

Soil properties (undrained)

Name Strength Strength increase From depth
kPa kN/m^3 m

Layers
Name Type Thickness Soil Dip OCR Tension
(m) (°) crack
Layer 1 Drained 2.00 Soil 1 0.0 1.0 None Not rigid
Layer 2 Drained 2.00 Soil 2 0.0 1.0 None Not rigid
Layer 3 Drained 10.00 Soil 3 0.0 1.0 None Not rigid

PAGE #8/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 2
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Boreholes
Name Depth Contains layers:
(m)
General Borehole 14Layer 1; Layer 2; Layer 3;

Water Tables
Name Type Depth Gradient Other Properties
(m) (kN/m^3)
Ground Water Hydrostatic 14.00 9.81Hydraulically connected to overlying water
Table

Retaining Walls
Name Type Depth of toe Upstand Material Density E
m m kg/m^3 GPa
UB 457X191X74 Custom 9.00 0.00 Steel 7800 200.0
kg/m, L=9.00m,
S=2.00m

Retaining Wall sections

Name Section Sectional area Moment of inertia Section modulus
cm^2/m cm^4/m cm^3/m
UB 457X191X74 Width = 0.191 m 47 16650 730
kg/m, L=9.00m,
S=2.00m

Surcharges
Name Type Depth Magnitude Other Properties
(m)
Surcharge 20kPa. Uniform 0.00 20.0kPa V U Load type = Custom Loading

Design Standard

Type = Custom Design Standard

Earth pressure coefficients
Type = Coulomb
Tension crack limited to the retained height
Cantilever toe-in = 20%

Equilibrium calculated at the minimum safe embedment (with designated safety factors)

Unfavourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 0.00
Favourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 1.00
Minimum surcharge = 20 kPa

PAGE #9/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 3
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Design Standard [Continued]

On shearing resistance = 1.00

On effective cohesion = 1.00
On undrained strength = 1.00

On effective earth pressures = 1.00

On total earth pressures = 1.00
Safety factor on resistance applied via: Strength factor method
Minimum active pressure = 0.00 kN/m^3

Unplanned excavation = 10% of clear height, but maximum of 0.5m

Softened formation = 0 m

On bending moments = 1.00

On shear forces = 1.00
On prop forces
Short-term = 1.00/1.00
Long-term = 1/1

PAGE #10/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 4
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Drawing Board

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

15

10

10

15

20

25

30
0 1 2 3 4 5 10
metres
Scale 1:250

PAGE #11/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 5
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Earth Pressures As Built

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

15

10

10

15

20

25

30
0 1 2 3 4 5 10
metres
Scale 1:250

PAGE #12/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 6
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Earth Pressures At Minimum Safe Embedment
15 10 5 0 5 10 15

15

10

10

15

20

25

30
0 1 2 3 4 5 10
metres
Scale 1:250

PAGE #13/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 7
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Earth Pressures At Failure

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

15

10

10

15

20

25

30
0 1 2 3 4 5 10
metres
Scale 1:250

PAGE #14/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 8
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Structural Forces

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

15

10

Largest factored bending moment = -151.3 kNm/m

Largest factored shear force = -380.6 kN/m

10

15

20

25

30
0 1 2 3 4 5 10
metres
Scale 1:250

PAGE #15/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 9
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Displacements

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

15

10

5
Max. settlement Max. horizontal movement
Upper = 24 mm Upper = 32 mm
Average = 18 mm Average = 24 mm
Lower = 12 mm Lower = 16 mm
0

10

15

20

25

30
0 1 2 3 4 5 10
metres
Scale 1:250

PAGE #16/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 10
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Earth Pressures As Built

Depth EarthPr WaterPr TotalPr EarthPr WaterPr TotalPr
m kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
Retained Retained Retained Excavated Excavated Excavated
0.00 4.75 0.00 4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 12.83 0.00 12.83 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 10.19 0.00 10.19 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 17.35 0.00 17.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 5.70 0.00 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 5.70 0.00 5.70 169.87 0.00 169.87
8.42 16.81 0.00 16.81 1232.42 0.00 1232.42

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Earth Pressures At Minimum Safe Embedment
Depth EarthPr WaterPr TotalPr EarthPr WaterPr TotalPr
m kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
Retained Retained Retained Excavated Excavated Excavated
0.00 4.75 0.00 4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 12.83 0.00 12.83 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 10.19 0.00 10.19 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 17.35 0.00 17.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 5.70 0.00 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 5.70 0.00 5.70 169.87 0.00 169.87
6.65 10.10 0.00 10.10 590.57 0.00 590.57

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Earth Pressures At Failure

Depth EarthPr WaterPr TotalPr EarthPr WaterPr TotalPr
m kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
Retained Retained Retained Excavated Excavated Excavated
0.00 4.75 0.00 4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 12.83 0.00 12.83 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 10.19 0.00 10.19 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 17.35 0.00 17.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 5.70 0.00 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 5.70 0.00 5.70 169.87 0.00 169.87
6.65 10.10 0.00 10.10 590.57 0.00 590.57

PAGE #17/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 11
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Required Embedment As Built

Results of earth pressure calculation
Retaining Wall
Name = Prototype: UB 457X191X74 kg/m, L=9.00m, S=2.00m
Retained height = 5.50 m
Depth of toe = 9.00 m
Partial factors
Factors on actions
Unfavourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 0.00
Favourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 1.00
Minimum surcharge = 20 kPa
Factors on material properties
On shearing resistance = 1.00
On effective cohesion = 1.00
On undrained strength = 1.00
Factors on resistance
On effective earth pressures = 1.00
On total earth pressures = 1.00
Safety factor on resistance applied via: Strength factor method
Minimum active pressure = 0.00 kN/m^3
Safety margins on geometry
Unplanned excavation = 10% of clear height, but maximum of 0.5m
Softened formation = 0 m
Factors on structural forces
On bending moments = 1.00
On shear forces = 1.00
On prop forces
Short-term = 1.00/1.00
Long-term = 1/1
Moments
Overturning = 329 kNm/m
Restoring = 2229 kNm/m
Out-of-balance = -1900 kNm/m
Restoring/Overturning = 677 %
Reaction at wall toe = -1962.8 kN/m

PAGE #18/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 12
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Required Embedment At Minimum Safe Embedment
Results of earth pressure calculation
Retaining Wall
Name = Prototype: UB 457X191X74 kg/m, L=9.00m, S=2.00m
Retained height = 5.50 m
Depth of toe = 6.89 m
Partial factors
Factors on actions
Unfavourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 0.00
Favourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 1.00
Minimum surcharge = 20 kPa
Factors on material properties
On shearing resistance = 1.00
On effective cohesion = 1.00
On undrained strength = 1.00
Factors on resistance
On effective earth pressures = 1.00
On total earth pressures = 1.00
Safety factor on resistance applied via: Strength factor method
Minimum active pressure = 0.00 kN/m^3
Safety margins on geometry
Unplanned excavation = 10% of clear height, but maximum of 0.5m
Softened formation = 0 m
Factors on structural forces
On bending moments = 1.00
On shear forces = 1.00
On prop forces
Short-term = 1.00/1.00
Long-term = 1/1
Moments
Overturning = 207 kNm/m
Restoring = 207 kNm/m
Out-of-balance = 0 kNm/m
Restoring/Overturning = 100 %
The wall is in equilibrium
Reaction at wall toe = -380.6 kN/m

PAGE #19/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 13
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. - Required Embedment At Failure

Results of earth pressure calculation
Retaining Wall
Name = Prototype: UB 457X191X74 kg/m, L=9.00m, S=2.00m
Retained height = 5.50 m
Depth of toe = 6.89 m
Partial factors
Factors on actions
Unfavourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 1.00
Favourable
Permanent (G) = 1.00
Variable (Q) = 1.00
Accidental (A) = 1.00
Minimum surcharge = 20 kPa
Factors on material properties
On shearing resistance = 1.00
On effective cohesion = 1.00
On undrained strength = 1.00
Factors on resistance
On effective earth pressures = 1.00
On total earth pressures = 1.00
Safety factor on resistance applied via: Gross passive pressures
Minimum active pressure = 0.00 kN/m^3
Safety margins on geometry
Unplanned excavation = None
Softened formation = 0 m
Factors on structural forces
On bending moments = 1.00
On shear forces = 1.00
On prop forces
Short-term = 1.00/1.00
Long-term = 1/1
Moments
Overturning = 207 kNm/m
Restoring = 207 kNm/m
Out-of-balance = 0 kNm/m
Restoring/Overturning = 100 %
The wall is in equilibrium
Reaction at wall toe = -380.6 kN/m

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. : Structural Forces

Depth Bending Shear Force Prop Force Notes
(m) Moment (kN/m) (kN/m)
(kNm/m)
5.75 -151.3 -2.9 See aboveMaximum bending moment
6.65 -3.8 -380.6 See aboveMaximum shear force

PAGE #20/29
Job No P-142 Revision Page No 14
Engineer A.C. Date 18/11/2019 Checked
Document: C:\Users\user2015\Desktop\FOUNDATION ANALYSIS JANUARY ReWaRD 2.5 Service
2017\P-142 KPW RAQ EXPO.RWD Release 9
Licensed to: Anmol Piling RWDDA44491D-

Case 1, Max. Retained Height= 5.00m. : Displacements

Max horz Max horz Max horz Max sett Max sett Max sett
Lower Avg Upper Lower Avg Upper
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
16 24 32 12 18 24

PAGE #21/29
DESIGN CALCULATION

PAGE #22/29
 DETERMINING THE CAPACITY OF UB 457x191x74 KG/M.
TABLE 3:
Bending Moment and Shear Force of individual section for the design are shown on the table
below:

Maximum
Service Bending Factor
Spacing Bending
Section Moment of
Moment
Safety
[kN.m./m.] [m.] [kN.m.]
1 -151.30 2.00 1.50 453.90

GENERAL DATA:

Ultimate Bending Moment = 453.9 kN.m.

MATERIALS PROPERTY

Steel Beam Section = 457x191x74 KG/M.

Depth of Section (h) = 457 mm.
Width of Section (b) = 190.4 mm.
Web Thickness (s) = 9 mm.
Flange Thickness (t) = 14.5 mm.
Section Modulus = 1460 cm3.
Fy = 355 MPa.

SOLUTION

Required Section Modulus = 1278.59 cm3.

Provided Section Modulus = 1460 cm3.

THEREFORE, STEEL SECTION 457x191x74 KG/M. SAFE

PAGE #23/29
DETERMINING CONCRETE PANEL

GENERAL DATA:

Height of Panel = 1000 mm.

Width of Panel = 1950 mm.
Thickness of Panel = 100 mm.
Concrete Grade = 25 MPa.

CONCRETE COVER

φ of Main Reinforcement = 10 mm.

Nominal Cover = 25 mm.
Effective depth (dx) = 70 mm.
Effective depth (dy) = 60 mm.

Maximum Earth Pressure = 17.35 kN./m2.

Ultimate Bending Moment = wl2 / 8 (Assuming simply supported beam)
= 13.01 kN.m.

SOLUTION

13.01 x 10^6
= = 0.1062
25 x 1000 x 70^2

= 66.5 mm.

= 7.78 mm.

13.01 x 10^6
= = 488.85 mm2/m.
0.87 x 460 x 66.5

THEREFORE STEEL SECTION USE 10 DIA. @ 100 CENTRE-CENTRE (785.4 mm2/m) MESH

PAGE #24/29
APPENDIX

PAGE #25/29
 LABORATORY Lt-.c.

BOREHOLE LOG
MATRIX LABORATORY L.L.C.
Client: DUBAI WORLO TRADE CENTER ' L.L'C. BOREHOLE No.: BH-B25
(ZONE 8)
Project: PROPOSED PN14O3-DTG'A-Ð(PO DEVELOPMENT
Sheet l/4
U.A.E.
Location: PLOT NO.5219784 MADINAT AL MATAAR'
Ground Level (m): +31.499 DMo
Boring Method: Rotary Dr¡¡ling
: Mud Casing Dia (mm) : 140 Casing Depth (m): 1'5 Coordinates:
Boring Diameten 125r99mm Drill Fluid
N 761 E 481,¡149.03
Equipment W¡rth 2
Zah¡d Al¡ No.: XSDrlS{¡143-8
Date Finished: 0310812015
DateStarted: 0110812015
Gore Recovery
'SPT Records Level
Description of Strata
Type and
N TCR scR RQD (m)
(m) Depth I5-30 30-¡15
(%) (%t
Number (m) t%l
0
B1

30.50
1- r.35 20 36 1415 >50 dense, brown, gravellY,
1 medium to sandstone
SPT2 Gravels are
prec€s.

29.50
25n 50t'12 >50 brown, si ty, 29.31
2 2-2-19
SPT3 Gravels are to sandstone
2.2-3-7

distinctly
63 47 23 fractures are extremely
3
CORE4
close to closely spaced and interbedded with cemented
sand-

3.7 - 5.2

4
62 40 14
CORE5

5.2- 6.7

27 0
CORE6
6

6.7 -A.2

7
59 28 0
CORET

I a.2-9.2

CORES 90 53

22.30
9.2-1 weak to very weak, lisht medium to
fine gra¡ned calcareous SAN DSTONE, partially lo
d¡st¡nctly weathered, fractures ale extremely close to
CORE9 97 35 0
closely spaced.
1
REMARKS:
SAMPLE KEY fl lP: lnitial Penetration
'õãiãã tev.l ¡s related to Duba¡ Munic¡Palitv Datum (DMD)' I SPT Standard Penetration Test !: Ground Water Table
' Ground water table was encountered at a deplh of 17'70m below
the exist¡ng ground I D x SPT( SPT with cone TCR: Total Core Recovery
. ln æsesõirefusal
immedialely after co
drive ¡s commenced
r seating drive'
I B Bulk Sample SCR: Solid Core Recovery
Û CORE : Core RQD: Rock
Logged By: NAVAS / AFSAL Checked By: ENGR. RABIH DAKWAR

B-8, Page
Append¡x PAGE 28 /39
#26/29
 LABORATORY rrc

BOREIIOLE LOG
MATRIX LABORATORY L.L.C.
Client: DUBAI WORLD TRADE GENTER. LL.G. BOREHOLE No.: BH-825
8)
Project: PRoPOSED PNI403-DTCJA-EXPO DEVELOPMENT IZONE
Sheet 2/4
PLOT NO. 52',19784, MADINATAL MATAAR'
U.LE.
Location
Ground Level (m): +31.499 DMD
Boring Method: Rotary Drilling
Coordinates:
Boring Diameter: 125199mm DrillFluid:MudCasingDia(mm):l4oCasingDepth(m):l'5
N E 481,449.03
Equipnient: w¡rth 2
Zahid Ali No.: XSDrl5{)l¡t3-8
DateStarted: 0110812015 Date Finished: 03108/2015
* SPT Records Core
Level Legend
RQD
Descript¡on of Strata
Typc and
N TCR SGR (m)
(m) Depth 0-15 15.30 30-¡15
Number (m) %t l%l 1%l
very to
1 partiallY to
10.2- fine grained calcareous
distinclly weathered, fractures ale e><femelY close
to
closely spaced.
90 35 0
coRE10

1
11-2-

95 39 0
coRE1l

12.2

.t3
95 55
coRE12

13-2

73 13 0
coREl3

17.00
14.5 - l6 to very
distínctly weathered to destuclured,
x
x {I
xq

'l
fractures are extremely close to very closely spaced. X
x {i
Xq
coRE14 61 11 0 x
x {iXq
x
x {I
xq
1 16 - 17.5 x
X {ixq
{I
xq
I
coRE15 60 14 x
{ixq
1 x
x {I
xq
17.5 - 19
X
x {T
Xq

1
x
x {ix(
coRElô 61 16 'l'l x
{ixq
X )<x
x *x
xd
12.50
'19 - 20.5
1 weak to weak, xxx
locally ¡nterbedded with conglomerate, part¡ally to xxx
d¡stinctly weathered, fractures are very closely to closely
xxx
xxx
spaced xxx
61 29 11 xxx
coRE17 xxx

REMARKS:
SAMPLE KEY !tP lnitial Penetration
* Ground level ¡s related to Duba¡ Munic¡Pal¡ty Datum (DMD)'
' Grcund water lable was encountered at a dePth of 17.70m below
E SPT : Standard Penetration Test v Ground Water Table

the ex¡st¡ng ground level ¡.e, at R.L. +13.80m DMD- tr SPT(C): SPT with cone TCR: Total Core Recovery
' ln æsesãirefusal under seal¡ng drive, the test drive ¡s commenced
immediately after æmpletion of penelrat¡on under seating drive'
X B : BulkSamPle SCR: Solid Core Recovery
Û CORE : Core SamPle RQD: Rock
Logged By : NAVAS / AFSAL Checked By: ENGR. RABIH DAKWAR

PAGE
Appendix B-8, Page 29 / 39
#27/29
 LABORATORY ur.c.

MATRD( LABORATORY L.L.C. BOREHOLE LOG

Client: DUBAI WORLD TRADE CENTER. L.L-C. BOREHOLE No.: BH-B25

Project: pRoPosED PNí403-DTCJA-EXPO DEVELOPMENT (ZONE 8)

Sheet 3/4
Location: PLOT NO. 5219784, MADINATAL MATAAR, DUBAI, U3.E.
Ground Level (m): +31.499 DMD
Boring Method: Rotary Drilling
Boring Diameter l25r99mm Drill Fluid : Mud Casing Dia (mm) : l4O Casing Depth (m) : l's Coordinates:
N 761,314.55 E 481
Equipment: W¡rth 2
Zah¡d Al¡ No.: XSDr'|ff)1434
DateStarted: 01108120'15 Date Finished: 0310812015
* SPT Records Gore Recovery
Description of Strata Level
Typ€ and Depth N TCR scR RQD (m)
(m)
Numb€r
1530
$t $t $l
X x
interbedded wirh conglomerate, partially to x x x
x x x
distinctly weathered fractures ale very closely to closely x x x
20.5-22 spaced. x x x
x X x
x x x
x X
x x X
't3 x x
60 0 x
coRE18
x
x X
X X X
x x x
X x X
22-23.5 x X x
x x x
X X x
x X x
x x x
X X
6'l 22 19 x x
coREl9 x x
X x X
x x x
x x
x x x
x X x
23.5 - 25 X x x
x x x
x x
X
x x X
55 20 17 x X x
coRE20 X x X
X X X
x x x
x x x
x x x
X x X
25-26-5 X X X
x x x
X x x
x x x
x x X
x x X
coRE2l 57 3l 23 x x
x x
x x
x x x
x X x
x X x
26.5-24 X x X
X X X
x X
x x x
X x x
x x x
coRE22 58 25 21 x x x
x x x
x x x
x x X
X x x
x x x
2A-29.5 x x X
x X x
X x X
X X X
x x X
x X
61 28 21 x x x
coRE23 x x x
x X x
x x X
x x x
x X
x x x
29.5 - 31 X X X
x x X
x X x

REMARKS:
SAMPLE KEY ! tP: lnitial Penetration
'Ground level ¡s related to Dubai Munic¡pality Datum (DMD)'
' Ground water table was encountered at a dePlh of 17-70m below
I SPT : Standard Penetration Test !: Ground Water Table
lhe ex¡sl¡ng ground level i.e. at R.L. +'13.80m DMD- x SPT(C): SPT with cone TCR: Total Core Recovery
' ln casesõirefusal under seating drìve, the test drive is commenced x B : Bulk SamPle SCR: Solid Core Recovery
immed¡alely after completion of penetration under seat¡ng drive.
o CORE : Core RQD: Rock
Logged By : NAVAS / AFSAL Checked By: ENGR. RABIH DAKWAR

PAGE
Append¡x B-8, Page#28/29
30 / 39
 LABORATORY r.r.c.

MATRD( LABORATORY L.L.C. BOREHOLE LOG

Client: DUBAI WORLD TRADE CENTER - L.L.C. BOREHOLE No.: BH-825

Project: pRoPosED PNí403-DTGJA-EXPO DEVELOPMENT (ZONE 8)

Sheet 4/4
PLOT NO. 5219784, MADINATAL MATAAR' U.A.E.
Location:
Ground Level (m): +31.499 DMD
Boring Method: Rotary' Drill¡ng
Boring Diameter: l25r99mm Drill Fluid : Mud Casing Dia (mm) : l4o Casing Depth (m) : 1's Coordinates:
N E 481,¡t49.03
Equipment: w¡Éh 2
Date Finished: o3lo8l2o15 Zah¡d A¡¡ No.: XSDrl5-01¡ß-8
DateStarted: O1lO8l2O15

'SPT Records Core

Description of Strata Level
TllPe and Depth 3045
N TCR scR RQD (m)
(m) fLl5 1
Numbef (m) t%l l%l t%l
xx
41 17 interbedded with conglomerate, partially to xx
coRE24 59
dist¡nctly weathered, fraclures ale very dosely to closely
xx
xx
spaced- xx
xx
xx
xx
31 -32.5 xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
coRE25 42 21 12 xx
xx
xx
xx
XX
-1.00
32.5- 25t9 't00/10 >1 00
SPT26 -'t .19
32.69 - are made of siltstone preces. x
weak to calcareous x
x
interbedded with conglomerate, partially to x
d¡stinctly weathered fractures are very closely to closely x
coRE2T 50 '14 I x
spaced. x
x
x
x
34 - 35.5
x
x
X
x
x
x
52 21 17 x
coRE28 X
x
X
x
X
x
35.5 - 37 x
x
x
x
x
28 7 0 x
coRE29 x
X
x
x
x
>100 -5.50 E
37 -37 25t9 100/10 brown,
SPT3O -5.69
37.'t9 - are made of siltstone pieces. x
calcareous x
with conglomerate, partially to
x
x
29 4 0 d¡st¡nctly weathered, frectures afe very closely to closely x
coRE3l x
spaced. x
x
x
100/9 >100 -7.00
38.5 25t9 dense, light sandy
SPT32 -7.18
38-68 - are made up s¡ltstone X
weak to weak, x
x
¡nterbedded with conglomerate, part¡ally to X
24 0 d¡st¡nctly weathered, fractures are very closely to closely X
coRE33 x
spaced. x
x
-8.30
OF

SAMPLE KEY E IP: lnitial Penetration

REMARKS:
'Ground level is related to Dubai Municipalþ Datum (DMD)-
' Ground water lable was encountered at a depth of 17.70m below
I SPT : Standard Penetration Test tf: Ground Water Table
the ex¡sting ground level ¡.e. at R,L. +13,8om DMD. X SPT(C): SPT with cone TCR: Total Core Recovery
' ln æsesãirefusal under sealing drive, the test drive ¡s commenced
immed¡ately after completion of Penetrat¡on under seat¡ng drive-
I e : BulkSample SCR: Solid Core Recovery
û CORE : Core RQD: Rock Q
Logged By: NAVAS / AFSAL Checked By: ENGR. RABIH DAKWAR

PAGE
Append¡x B-8, 31 /39
Page #29/29