Poor Attitude Towards Assignment and Academic Performance in Home Economics
Poor attitudes towards home economics among students can negatively impact their academic performance in the subject. A study found that students often chose home economics because they thought it was just about cooking. However, their teachers reported that students did not take the subject seriously and were unlikely to do well. Prejudices around traditional gender roles also discouraged some boys from studying home economics, as they might face ridicule from their peers. Additionally, the subject is taught almost exclusively by female teachers, further perpetuating its association with traditional femininity. These factors help explain the low enrollment numbers in home economics programs in Ireland.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views
Poor Attitude Towards Assignment and Academic Performance in Home Economics
Poor attitudes towards home economics among students can negatively impact their academic performance in the subject. A study found that students often chose home economics because they thought it was just about cooking. However, their teachers reported that students did not take the subject seriously and were unlikely to do well. Prejudices around traditional gender roles also discouraged some boys from studying home economics, as they might face ridicule from their peers. Additionally, the subject is taught almost exclusively by female teachers, further perpetuating its association with traditional femininity. These factors help explain the low enrollment numbers in home economics programs in Ireland.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Poor attitude towards assignment and Academic Performance in Home Economics
There is little empirical research about pupils’ participation in home economics
education. However, a study by Attar (1990) revealed that pupil expected home economics to be about cooking and this was attractive to those who chose the subject. Their teachers reported that pupils are not likely to do well or to take the subject seriously because their attitude towards assignment and one teacher reported that the pupil’s involvement could be explained by ‘the call of the adolescent stomach’. One reason for the poor uptake of home economics is the attitude towards assignment by pupils is offered by Wynn (1983). She argues that attitudes persist regarding the curriculum offering of home economics. ‘These attitudes provide a hidden curriculum which encourages pupils to conform to stereotyped roles’. Furthermore, she asserts that knowledge and awareness of curriculum changes are limited. ‘These attitudes show a lack of understanding of much current teaching of home economics, and of its potential’. The entry of boys into the home economics classroom ‘may not change the world’ but is vital. Without this aspect of school life the education of boys is incomplete; boys need to be encouraged to be self- sufficient, and need to know as much about food, nutrition, fabrics, decision-making, organization of time and all the other aspects of the subject as do girls. (Wynn 1983) Arguably, there are other factors that discourage some boys from studying home economics such as prejudice around sex roles. Kessler et al. (1987) acknowledge that ‘particular kinds of behaviour, particular ways of being, are culturally dominant’. These patterns of masculinity or femininity are presumed to be natural, and deviation from this norm attracts ridicule and antagonism. Prejudice existed around changing sex roles during the 1970s and 1980s and Attar (1990) reported how boys studying ‘recreational home economics’ were subjected to ‘taunts of homosexuality from their peers’ and ‘many people consider boys who enjoy cooking rather ‘effeminate’. Another unresolved sex contradiction is the significant discrepancy that exists between exclusivity of women (n=1624) to men (n=4) working as home economics teachers in Ireland (Teaching Council 2014). In essence, the subject is taught almost exclusively by women, who act as role models and ultimately perpetuate the pattern. Paechter (2000) argues that home economics teachers were ‘until recently inducted into this world through separate training institutions’ and arguably led to the development of an ‘ultra-feminine ethos’. However in Ireland, home economics education is not physically integrated into the university system. There are currently two male pupils on home economics programme in Ireland, out of a total of 247 pupils (St. Angela’s College 2014). These statistics overall can hardly support the cause to rid the subject of its