Obligations and Contracts: By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
Obligations and Contracts: By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
CONTRACTS
LECTURE 6
By: Atty. Wilfred Francis B. Martinez
Kinds of Obligations
Kinds of Obligations
1. Pure and Conditional Obligations
2. Obligations with a Period
3. Alternative and Facultative Obligations
4. Joint and Solidary Obligations
5. Divisible and Indivisible obligations
6. Obligations with a Penal Clause
Kinds of Obligations
1. Pure and Conditional Obligations
2. Obligations with a Period
3. Alternative and Facultative Obligations
4. Joint and Solidary Obligations
5. Divisible and Indivisible obligations
6. Obligations with a Penal Clause
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Pure Obligation:
Art. 1179. Every obligation whose performance does not
depend upon a future or uncertain event, or upon a past
event unknown to the parties, is demandable at once.
Every obligation which contains a resolutory condition
shall also be demandable, without prejudice to the
effects of the happening of the event.
Art. 1180. When the debtor binds himself to pay when
his means permit him to do so, the obligation shall be
deemed to be one with a period, subject to the
provisions of Article 1197.
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Pure Obligation:
It is an obligation whose effectivity or extinguishment does not
depend upon the fulfillment or nonfulfillment of a condition or
event.
A pure obligation is one which is not subject to any condition and
no specific date is mentioned for its fulfillment and is, therefore,
immediately demandable.
Example: X promises to pay P5,000.00 to Y upon the demand of Y.
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Pure obligations are generally characterized by their immediate
demandability.
Example: Floriano vs Delgado
X obtains a loan from Z in the amount of P10,000.00.
X makes a promissory note promising to pay Z the amount
of the loan plus interest. X did not indicate when he was
supposed to pay the loan.
The Supreme Court ruled that Z can immediately demand
the payment of the same, however, X is allowed a
reasonable period pay back the loan. In this case, the
Court gave X 10 days to pay.
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Conditional Obligation:
Art. 1181. In conditional obligations, the acquisition
of rights, as well as the extinguishment or loss of
those already acquired, shall depend upon the
happening of the event which constitutes the
condition.
A conditional obligation is one whose consequences
are subject in one way or another to the fulfillment
of a condition.
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Conditional Obligation:
What is a Condition?
Every future and uncertain event upon which an obligation or provision is
made to depend.
It is a “trigger” or “switch” that, if activated, will give rise or extinguish
an obligation.
Notes:
An event which is certain to happen, though it is unknown when it will
happen, is not a condition but an obligation with a term. (Example: X
will give Z his car upon the death of A.)
It is not enough that the event happened, there must be a show of
proof that the event had happened in order to “trigger” the event.
(Example: X will give his house to Z if Z is able to finish his Doctorate
degree. Once Z shows proof that he completed his Doctorate degree,
X will be obligated to deliver his house to Z.)
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Exception to the rule that a condition must be a future event:
Past events may be considered as a condition provided that the
past event was unknown to the parties. (Example: X may agree
to purchase a home from Z, a real estate agent, if the house
being offered by Z has a gold plated toilet. If Z is able to find
this house with a gold plated toilet, X is obligated to purchase
the house from Z.)
In the above case, the element of future is missing, however, it
is still considered as a “conditional obligation” because the
past event is unknown by the parties.
Pure and Conditional Obligations
Classification of Conditions:
1. Suspensive and Resolutory.
2. Potestative, Casual, and Mixed.
3. Divisible and Indivisible.
4. Conjunctive and Disjunctive.
5. Positive and Negative.
6. Express and Implied.
7. Possible and Impossible.
Suspensive and Resolutory
Suspensive and Resolutory.
Suspensive Condition: (Article 1192)
Gives rise to an obligation.
Rights will only be acquired upon the happening of the condition.
Resolutory Condition: (Article 1192)
Extinguishes an obligation.
Rights are already acquired, however, the happening of the condition
extinguishes those rights.
Suspensive and Resolutory
Differences between a Suspensive and Resolutory
Condition:
Suspensive Resolutory
If the condition is fulfilled, the If the condition is fulfilled, the
obligation arises. obligation is extinguished.
If the condition does not take place, If the condition does not take place,
performance will not be required. the legal tie subsists or continues.
The existence of the obligation is The obligation already exists but is
mere hope that the event will subjected to the threat of
happen. termination or extinguishment.
Suspensive and Resolutory
Examples of Suspensive Condition:
X will give his car to Z if Z passes his board exam.
A will sell his house to B if B is able to obtain a fire insurance for
the house.
Examples of Resolutory Condition:
X will give his car to Z immediately, however, Z will return the car
after Z passes the board exam.
M will lease his condominium unit to B until B is able to buy his
own house. Once B buys his own house, B will be obligated to
return the condominium unit to M.
Class Participation (SW8)
Instruction: Identify which among the following are
suspensive conditions, and which are resolutory
conditions.
1. Maria is a student of medicine studying in UST. To help
reduce her travel time, her godfather obligated himself
to let Maria use his car until she graduates from UST.
2. Juan bought a house from Pedro. The terms of payment
are as follows: (a) P1,000,000.00 as down payment; (b)
P2,000,000.00 remaining price to be paid when Pedro
finishes the ongoing renovations to the house.
Class Participation (SW8)
3. Kazel and Lorenzo entered into an agreement whereby
Kazel will lend her Car to Lorenzo, and in exchange,
Lorenzo will allow Kazel to use his Condominium Unit.
They executed an agreement which contained a provision
stating that both parties will return their respective
properties once Lorenzo’s son reaches the age of
majority (18 years old).
4. John is a student at XYZ University. The University gave
him a Scholarship. To maintain the scholarship, John is
required to maintain a final grade of 90 points in all his
classes. If John does not reach this grade, his scholarship
will be taken away.
Potestative, Casual and Mixed Condition
Potestative Condition
Art. 1182. When the fulfillment of the condition depends upon
the sole will of the debtor, the conditional obligation shall be
void. If it depends upon chance or upon the will of a third person,
the obligation shall take effect in conformity with the provisions
of this Code.
Potestative, Casual and Mixed Condition
Potestative Condition
A condition that depends upon the will of one of the contracting parties, as a
general rule, a Potestative Condition is valid.
Example: X promised to give Z a bonus of P500,000.00 if Z is able to build a
house for X in three months.
When can a potestative condition invalidate or void an obligation?
If the condition is based solely upon the will of the debtor (Purely Potestative
Condition). Examples:
1. X borrows P500,000.00 from Y. X will pay back Y when he feels like it. – This is a
void obligation.
2. X borrows P500,000.00 from Y. X will pay back Y when X has money. – This is a valid
obligation.
3. X borrows P500,000.00 from Y. X will pay back Y when X decides to sell his house. –
This is a void obligation.
4. X borrows P500,000.00 from Y. X will pay back Y when X sells his house which is
currently for sale. – This is a valid obligation.
Potestative, Casual and Mixed Condition
Why are Purely Potestative conditions void?
Because the validity and compliance of the obligation is left to the
will of the debtor, thus, the creditor is deprived of his right to
demand its fulfillment.
There is no burden or consequence on the part of the debtor. The
debtor can simply say that he will not perform his obligation, and
leave the creditor without any recourse (“iniwan sa ere”.
In the void examples in the previous slide. X seems to have an
obligation to pay back Y, however, such obligation will only arise
based on X’s decision. Y is therefore stripped of his right to go
after X if X decides not to pay back the loan.
X may have a moral obligation to pay back the loan, but X is not
bound by a legal obligation. As a result, Y cannot even go to court to
ask for fulfillment. Because of this, the law prohibits Purely
Potestative Condition.
Potestative, Casual and Mixed Condition
Note: Conditional obligations that depend purely upon the will
of the debtor is void (Purely Potestative Conditions), however,
if the conditional obligation depend purely upon the will of the
creditor, the obligation is valid.
Why?
1. Because Article 1182 mentions only debtor/obligee.
2. Because the creditor is naturally interested in the fulfillment of the
obligation.
Example:
X obligated himself to pay back his loan to Y when he is in the mood to
pay it back. – Void because the payment is purely upon the will of the
DEBTOR.
X obligated himself to pay back his loan to Y, when Y is in the mood to
receive the payment made by X. – Valid because the collection of the
debt is purely upon the will of the CREDITOR.
Potestative, Casual and Mixed Condition
What if the condition is partially based upon the will of
the debtor and partially upon chance or the will of a
third person?
The obligation is valid.
This is known as a Mixed Condition.
It is valid because, even though the condition is based upon the
will of the debtor, the condition still has a chance of being
“triggered” or “activated” by an event outside of the debtor’s
control.
Potestative, Casual and Mixed Condition
Example: Jacinto vs Chua Leng
X (buyer) and Z (seller) entered into a contract of sale for a piece of
land. The land is occupied by illegal settlers (squatters).
X and Z agreed that, X will pay the remaining balance for the land
when the squatters are evicted. X undertook the obligation to evict
the squatters.
PROBLEM: X never evicted the squatters. Because the squatters were
not evicted, X’s obligation to pay the remaining balance did not arise.
The seller (Z) claims that the obligation is purely potestative and
wants the contract be declared void. Is Z correct?
SC Decision: Z is not correct. The condition is mixed and not purely
potestative.
In this case, if X did not want to evict the squatters, Z still has the
option to evict the squatters himself since he is still the legal owner of
the land. If Z is successful in evicting the squatters, X’s obligation to
pay the remaining balance arises.
Class Participation (SW9)
Instruction: Identify which among the following
conditional obligations are valid.
1. “On this date, I, Juan Dela Cruz, in the presence of two
witnesses, promises to pay my debt in the amount of
P500,000.00 to Maria Beltran, if I place my house on
sale.”