Studies in Humanized Mice and Convalescent Humans Yield A Sars-Cov-2 Antibody Cocktail
Studies in Humanized Mice and Convalescent Humans Yield A Sars-Cov-2 Antibody Cocktail
I
ovary (CHO) cells to produce recombinant fully
n the setting of the current coronavirus these two fundamentally different approaches human antibodies. Cultured supernatants con-
disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there were independently exploited to develop fully taining secreted antibodies were subjected
has been urgency to develop potent anti- human antibody treatments for the lethal to high-throughput screening for RBD protein
viral treatments, and early efforts have infectious disease caused by the Ebola virus: binding. Thousands of antibodies were isolated
hearkened back to the days of Emil von Genetically humanized VelocImmune (VI) mice and subsequently screened for binding affinity
Behring, who won the Nobel prize for show- (3, 4) generated an Ebola antibody cocktail to RBD monomer and dimer, epitope diversity,
ing that antibodies can be transferred in treatment (5), whereas sorting B cells from a ability to block angiotensin-converting enzyme
serum. However, technological advances over recovered patient yielded a single–therapeutic 2 (ACE2) receptor binding to RBD, and ability
the last century have allowed for the progres- antibody treatment (6). to neutralize vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)–
sion from using convalescent serum to the In this work, we describe parallel high- based SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudoparticles [pVSV-
utilization of recombinant fully human anti- throughput efforts using both mice and hu- SARS-CoV-2-S(mNeon)]. Screening yielded
bodies. The proposal to genetically humanize mans to generate antibodies against the spike >200 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)
the immune system of mice (1) has provided protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome with broad potency ranges, dozens of which
an efficient source of naturally selected, fully coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The ability to displayed neutralization potency in the pico-
human antibodies. For example, such mice derive antibodies using genetically human- molar range.
have been used to develop checkpoint inhibi- ized VI mice as well as B cells derived from More than 200 of the VI mouse and human-
tors for immune oncology (2) as well as Food convalescent patients enabled us to isolate a derived antibodies isolated in the primary
and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved very large collection of fully human antibodies screen neutralized VSV-based SARS-CoV-2
antibodies for the treatment of rheumatoid with diverse sequences, binding properties, spike pseudoparticles at >70% with ~2 mg/ml
arthritis, cardiovascular disease, cutaneous and antiviral activities. The prospective goal of expressed antibodies. The antibody varia-
squamous cell carcinoma, and allergic dis- of these parallel efforts was to generate a large ble regions were sequenced by next-generation
eases such as asthma and atopic dermatitis. and diverse collection so as to allow for the sequencing, and the repertoire for heavy and
More recently, the ability to sort individual B selection of pairs of highly potent individual light chain pairs was identified (Fig. 1). The
cells from previously infected human patients antibodies that could simultaneously bind predominant lineage of VI mouse antibodies
and molecularly clone the antibody genes from the critical receptor binding domain (RBD) utilized VH3-53 paired with VK1-9, VK1-33,
these B cells has led to an independent source of the spike protein, thereby providing ideal or VK1-39, whereas our human-derived anti-
of human antibodies, albeit limited to anti- partners for a therapeutic antibody cocktail bodies utilized VH3-66 paired with VK1-33 or
bodies that target infectious agents. Recently, that would have the potential to decrease the VH2-70 paired with VK1-39. Notably, VH3-53
likelihood of virus escape mutants that might usage has recently been reported for another
1
2
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA. arise in response to selective pressure from human-derived potent neutralizing anti-
National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng
single-antibody treatments (7). body against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (9–11),
Hospital, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Lee Kong Chian
School of Medicine, 16 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore Anti–SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were which indicates that combining the VI mouse
308442, Singapore. 3Department of Microbiology and generated with the following two methods. approach with the human platforms allows
Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, First, VI mice were immunized with a DNA plas- the expanded capture of common rearrange-
Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
*These authors contributed equally to this work. mid that expresses SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ments found in potent neutralizing SARS-
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] and then were boosted with a recombinant CoV-2 mAbs seen in humans. Further analysis
of overlaid sequences (fig. S2) showed strong tion. The antibodies bound specifically and tion of SARS-CoV-2 in VeroE6 cells (Fig. 2, B to
overlap in the repertoire of isolated kappa with high affinity to monomeric SARS-COV-2 D). All neutralization assays generated similar
chains between VI mouse and human-derived RBD [dissociation constant (Kd) = 0.56 to potency across the four mAbs, and no combi-
antibodies. Although the repertoire of lambda 45.2 nM] and dimeric SARS-COV-2 RBD (Kd = nations demonstrated synergistic neutrali-
chains did not overlap well, that may be because 5.7 to 42.8 pM). Because recombinant ACE2 zation activity (Fig. 2, C and D). As previous
only two lambda mice were included in this receptor is being considered as a COVID-19 studies indicate pseudoparticles contain-
trial. The average complementarity-determining therapeutic (13), we tested the potency of re- ing the SARS-CoV-2 spike are precleaved by
region (CDR) lengths (fig. S2D) for heavy chains combinant dimeric human ACE2-Fc (hACE2-hFc) furin-like proteases at the polybasic S1-S2
was similar between VI mouse and human- in our neutralization assay. Although recom- cleavage site during biogenesis in HEK293T
derived antibodies, with average lengths of 13 binant ACE2 was able to mediate neutraliza- cells, we assessed the impact of this cleavage
and 14.5 amino acids, respectively. The average tion of the VSV-based spike pseudoparticles on mAb neutralization potency. Spike-stabilized
kappa CDR length (fig. S2E) was the same for as previously reported, its potency was reduced pseudoparticles (fig. S3A) with a monobasic
VI mouse and human-derived antibodies at by more than a factor of 1000 compared with cleavage site (FurMut) in the S1-S2 interface or
9 amino acids, and the lengths were similar that of the best neutralizing mAbs (Fig. 2, A deleted region (FurKO) were produced as pre-
for lambda chains (fig. S2F), with an average and B). viously described (14, 15). No differences were
length of 11.1 and 10.6 amino acids, respectively. A smaller collection of four antibodies was observed in neutralization of either FurMut-
Approximately 40 antibodies with distinct chosen for further analyses to determine whether or FurKO-containing pseudoparticles relative
sequences and potent neutralization activ- the above binding data to RBD reflected bind- to wild-type (WT) in Vero cells (fig. S3B). No-
ities were chosen for additional characteri- ing to trimeric spike protein, whether neutral- tably, stabilized pseudoparticles had compa-
zation, as described below. The neutralization ization potencies noted in the above assays rable or greater infectivity to those with WT
potency of these mAbs spanned the single-digit were consistent with those seen in other assays cleavage sites in Vero cells, whereas substan-
to triple-digit picomolar range in the VSV-based including with SARS-CoV-2, and whether these tial loss of infectivity was observed in Calu-3
pseudoparticle assay. Antibodies shown to antibodies retained neutralization activity against cells (fig. S3C). Authentic SARS-CoV-2 with a
cross-neutralize SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 pseudoparticles with mutations in the S1-S2 natural deletion of the S1-S2 junction also had
spike proteins were weakly neutralizing (12). cleavage site. The binding affinity of these defects in infectivity in Calu-3 but not in Vero
So instead of focusing on cross-neutralizers, four antibodies against trimeric SARS-CoV-2 cells (16), which implicates differential prote-
we focused on nine of the most potent neu- spike (Kd = 37.1 to 42.8 pM) largely paral- ase usage between these two cell types. To in-
tralizing mAbs, with neutralization potencies leled the affinity against the RBD (table S3). vestigate the mechanism of neutralization, we
ranging from 7 to 99 pM (Fig. 2A and table Additionally, the potent neutralizing activity generated antigen-binding fragments (Fabs)
S1). All of these neutralizing mAbs bound to of these four antibodies was confirmed in for the four antibodies. We compared immuno-
the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike and blocked its the additional neutralization assays, includ- globulin G (IgG) with corresponding Fabs side
ability to interact with ACE2 with double-digit ing neutralization of pVSV-SARS-CoV-2-S by side for their ability to neutralize pseudo-
picomolar median inhibitory concentrations (mNeon) in the human lung epithelial Calu-3 typed VSV (fig. S4). The IC50s of all the Fabs
(IC50s) (table S1), which supports ACE2 block- cell line, neutralization of replicating VSV- were shifted compared with those of their
ade as the primary mechanism for neutraliza- SARS-CoV-2-S in Vero cells, and neutraliza- parental IgGs, which indicates that bivalent
binding, cross-linking, and steric hindrance in the ADCP assay (fig. S5 and table S3). Al- spike protein RBD, we performed hydrogen-
might all augment neutralization. though REGN10934 was able to mediate both deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-
Although the role of antibody effector func- ADCC and ADCP, it was not as strong of an in- MS) with the same nine antibodies (Fig. 3),
tion in protection against SARS-CoV-2 is yet ducer in those assays as the other three mAbs which revealed where each of the antibodies
unknown, it has been well established that it (fig. S6 and table S4). Further identification contacts the surface of the RBD and allowed
plays an important role in mAb therapeutic of mAb epitopes through high-resolution struc- comparison with the ACE2 binding site on the
efficacy against other viruses such as Ebola tural analysis may help illuminate the relation- RBD (Fig. 3). As might be expected, most of
and influenza viruses (17–19). Effector cells ship between specific epitopes and effector our neutralizing antibodies contact the RBD
including macrophages and monocytes have function of anti-spike mAbs. in a manner that overlaps the RBD residues
also been shown to be important for antibody- A prospective goal of our effort was to iden- that comprise the ACE2 interface; further-
mediated protection from SARS-CoV-1 infec- tify highly potent individual antibodies that more, the antibodies can be grouped on the
tion (20). To understand whether our lead could be paired in a therapeutic antibody cock- basis of their pattern of contacting the RBD
antibodies are capable of mediating effector tail, aiming to decrease the potential for de- surface. Comparing the cross-competition bind-
function, we assessed both antibody-dependent creased efficacy caused by variants arising as ing assays with the HDX-MS results provides
cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody- the pandemic spreads or by virus escape mu- structural insights into the mechanism by which
dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) activ- tants that might be selected for in response to noncompeting pairs of antibodies can simul-
ity in primary human cell bioassays utilizing pressure from a single-antibody treatment (7). taneously bind the RBD and can thus be ideal
natural killer (NK) cells and monocyte-derived Thus, we examined our nine most-potent neu- partners for a therapeutic antibody cocktail.
phagocytes. All four lead antibodies demon- tralizing antibodies in cross-competition bind- REGN10987 and REGN10933 represent such
strated the ability to mediate ADCC and ADCP, ing assays (fig. S7) and identified several pairs a pair of antibodies: REGN10933 targets the
Fig. 2. Neutralization potency of anti–SARS-CoV-2 spike mAbs. (A) Serial pVSV-SARS-CoV-2-S(mNeon) in Calu-3 cells. (C) Neutralization potency of
dilutions of anti-spike mAbs, IgG1 isotype control, and recombinant dimeric individual anti-spike mAbs and combinations of mAbs against replicating
ACE2 (hACE2.hFc) were added with pVSV-SARS-CoV-2-S(mNeon) to Vero VSV-SARS-CoV-2-S virus in Vero cells. Cells were infected with a multiplicity
cells, and mNeon expression was measured 24 hours after infection as a of infection (MOI) 1 of the virus and stained for viral protein 24 hours after
readout for virus infectivity. Data are graphed as percent neutralization relative infection to measure infectivity. (D) Neutralization potency of individual
to virus-only infection control. (B) Neutralization potency of anti-spike mAbs, anti-spike mAbs and combinations of mAbs against SARS-CoV-2-S virus
recombinant dimeric ACE2, and IgG1 isotype control against nonreplicating in VeroE6 cells.
4. L. E. Macdonald et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, or in part with federal funds from the U.S. Department of Health through a materials transfer agreement upon request at
5147–5152 (2014). and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for https://regeneron.envisionpharma.com/vt_regeneron/. For
5. K. E. Pascal et al., J. Infect. Dis. 218, S612–S626 (2018). Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and questions about how Regeneron shares materials, use the email
6. D. Corti et al., Science 351, 1339–1342 (2016). Development Authority, under OT number HHSO100201700020C. address preclinical.collaborations@ regeneron.com. This work is
7. A. Baum et al., Science 369, 1014–1018 (2020). Author contributions: J.H., A.B., B.O.F., A.H., E.U., A.R., T.H., J.F., licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
8. X. Wang, B. D. Stollar, J. Immunol. Methods 244, 217–225 P.B., R.B., B.Z., M.Fra., A.J.M., N.S., G.D.Y., and C.A.K. conceptualized (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
(2000). and designed experiments. J.H., K.E.P., V.R., S.G., E.W., B.O.F., Y.Y., and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
9. Y. Cao et al., Cell 182, 73–84.E16 (2020). K.K., K.P., K.M.C., E.U., J.Ch., A.R., C.L., M.M., W.-y.L., R.W., S.P., properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://
10. Y. Wu et al., Science 368, 1274–1278 (2020). J.Cr., B.Z., A.R.H., K.S., Y.Z., M.Fra., S.W., J.L., R.H., and M.Fri. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license does not
11. T. F. Rogers et al., Science 369, 956–963 (2020). performed research. J.H., K.E.P., V.R., S.G., E.W., B.O.F., Y.Y., apply to figures/photos/artwork or other content included in the
12. M. Yuan et al., Science 368, 630–633 (2020). K.K., K.P., K.M.C., E.U., J.Ch., A.R., J.F., C.L., M.M., W.-y.L., G.F., article that is credited to a third party; obtain authorization
13. C. Lei et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 2070 (2020). D.D., J.Cr., P.B., R.B., N.L., C.C., B.Z., A.R.H., K.S., Y.Z., M.Fra., S.W., from the rights holder before using such material.
14. A. C. Walls et al., Cell 181, 281–292.e6 (2020). J.L., R.H., M.Fri., G.C., W.O., N.S., G.D.Y., and C.A.K. analyzed data.
15. D. Wrapp et al., Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020). S.S. and D.C.L. acquired reagents. J.H., A.B., A.R., B.Z., M.Fra., G.D.Y., SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
16. S. Y. Lau et al., Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 837–842 (2020). and C.A.K. wrote the paper. C.A.K. acquired funding. Competing
science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6506/1010/suppl/DC1
17. D. J. DiLillo, P. Palese, P. C. Wilson, J. V. Ravetch, interests: Regeneron authors own options and/or stock of the
Materials and Methods
J. Clin. Invest. 126, 605–610 (2016). company. This work has been described in one or more pending
Figs. S1 to S7
18. E. O. Saphire, S. L. Schendel, B. M. Gunn, J. C. Milligan, G. Alter, provisional patent applications. G.C., W.O., A.J.M., N.S., G.D.Y., and
Tables S1 to S5
Nat. Immunol. 19, 1169–1178 (2018). C.A.K. are officers of Regeneron. Data and materials availability:
References (23–33)
19. E. O. Saphire et al., Cell 174, 938–952.e13 (2018). The structure of SARS-CoV-2 RBD in complex with REGN10933 and
MDAR Reproducibility Checklist
20. F. Yasui et al., Virology 454-455, 157–168 (2014). REGN10987 Fabs has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank,
21. R. Yan et al., Science 367, 1444–1448 (2020). Data S1
with PDB ID 6XDG. The corresponding cryo-EM map is available in
22. J. Lan et al., Nature 581, 215–220 (2020). the Electron Microscopy Data Bank, with ID EMD-22137. Sequences View/request a protocol for this paper from Bio-protocol.
of the nine characterized antibodies have been deposited in
ACKN OW LEDG MEN TS GenBank and are available in the supplementary materials. 30 May 2020; accepted 11 June 2020
SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2020/06/15/science.abd0827.DC1
MATERIALS
RELATED http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/12/541/eabb5883.full
CONTENT
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/12/549/eabb9401.full
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/12/534/eabb1469.full
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/12/546/eabc1931.full
REFERENCES This article cites 33 articles, 12 of which you can access for free
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6506/1010#BIBL
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of
Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of
Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works