Project - Proposal Final
Project - Proposal Final
Aaron Bartholomew
Cameron Ghassemi
Dr. Tayag
• Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………p. 2
• Project Description……………………………………………………………………...p. 3
o Background/Application Area…………………………………………………..p.3
o Proposed Experiment…………………………………………………………...p. 5
o Schedule of Work………………………………………………………………p. 8
• References…………………………………………………………..…………………p. 10
1
Abstract
Characterizing the refractive index profiles of artificial intraocular lenses could aid the
advancement and development of the technology used in their construction. However, this type
of characterization cannot be obtained through any direct form of measurement. Instead, one
way to obtain the three dimensional refractive index profile of an intraocular lens is through
computed tomography (CT). By sweeping an intraocular lens through a full range of angles and
measuring the refractive index of the lens at each of these respective angles, one can gather a
paired set of data, specifying refractive index with respect to angular rotation of the lens. With
this data, it is then possible to reconstruct the three dimensional refractive index profile of the
interferometer. The phase shift caused by the presence of this lens in an interferometer’s signal
path creates an interference pattern at the interferometer’s output that can be related to the lens’s
refractive index at its given angular position. By rotating the sample lens on a rotation stage
through a full range of angles and recording the interferometer’s output on a CCD camera at each
of these respective angles, it is possible to obtain the necessary data to move forward with the
refractive index profile reconstruction. One advantage of using a laser interferometer system to
make refractive index measurements of an intraocular lens is that the process is nondestructive,
allowing us to preserve the sample lens. Though there are several steps to coming up with the
refractive index profiles of intraocular lenses, as previously described, the focus of our project
obtain certain interference patterns at various angles of incidence on the intraocular lens.
2
Project Description
Background/Application Area.
and presbyopia are becoming ever more popular and commonplace as well as continually
undergoing improvements and advances in methods as well as materials. One of the newest
innovations in this field is a phakic intraocular lens (IOL) which can be implanted in a patient’s
eye to complement the eye’s own optical elements. The phakic IOL has advantages over laser-
based procedures such as LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy in that the lens can be
removed if complications arise, the lens can be used to correct more extreme vision problems,
Most phakic intraocular lenses are made of a transparent polymer or elastomer material
that allows them to be flexible while still maintaining their shape. They also contain haptics,
supporting spring structures attached to the lens which hold the lens in place within the eye. The
lens is generally implanted in the anterior chamber of the eye between the cornea and the iris.
The IOL is folded and inserted through a small incision of 3 mm or less. The refractive index
profile of each IOL determines the quality and effectiveness of the lens and must be very precise,
thus making it an area of great interest for both scientists and manufacturers1.
The proposed experimental setup for measuring the refractive index profiles of
of optical devices that allows precise measurement of phase shift caused by an object placed in
its signal path. This measurement is taken by observing the interference patterns at the
interferometer’s output. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer, such as the one proposed for use in
3
Figure 1: Mach-Zehnder Interferometer
The incident polarized beam is split with a 50/50 non-polarizing beam splitter, creating
two separate beams. One of the beams is guided by a fixed mirror through the air to a second
beam splitter, creating a reference path. The other beam is guided by a fixed mirror to the
second beam splitter as well. However, a test sample is placed in this second (signal) path,
creating a phase difference between the signal and reference paths at the second beam splitter
and an interference pattern at the output of the interferometer. This interference pattern can be
related to the refractive index of the object placed in the interferometer’s signal path2.
many different methods of obtaining the set of two-dimensional scans of the object. They
ultrasound, electrons, and laser interferometry. The scanning method chosen in a particular
4
situation depends on the application and the physical properties of the object being scanned. X-
rays are one of the most common CT scanning methods. They are used in medical applications,
non-destructive testing, and package screening. Gamma rays are used in nuclear medicine, but
they present serious radiation dose concerns. Ultrasound is used to create very crude pictures in
applications such as geological prospecting. When selecting from the many CT scanning
options, a balance is considered between resolution, sensitivity, and patient dosage. The
proposed experiment will use laser light as the CT scanning method. An optical technique must
be used in order to obtain the three dimensional refractive index profile of our intraocular lens3.
Proposed Experiment.
The proposed experiment involves the construction of the optical system shown in Figure
2 on pp. 7. We will use a 514.5nm argon laser as our light source, and we will filter the incident
light with a spatial filter, shown in Figure 3 on pp. 7, to create a clean collimated beam. A
spatial filter works by first focusing down the incident collimated laser beam with an aspheric
lens, then passing the resulting beam through a small aperture (pinhole) to filter the beam. Once
the light has been filtered, the output beam is collimated with a plano-convex lens. The
following calculations are used to determine the desired parameters for the optics of the spatial
filter.
The following equation is used to calculate the necessary pinhole diameter, where we picked an
5
The following equation is used to calculate the Gaussian beam divergence, which will be
λ 514 .5nm
Θ1 = = = .0655 rad , where:
πW0 π (5µm / 2)
Θ1 = Gaussian beam divergence
λ = laser wavelength
W0 = beam waist (pinhole radius)
For our application, when collimating the output beam from the spatial filter, it is necessary to
The following equation is used to determine the necessary focal length of the plano-convex
y2 1.5cm / 2
f = = = 114 .5mm , where:
Θ1 .0655 rad
f = focal length of collimating lens
y 2 = collimated beam radius
Θ1 = Gaussian beam divergence
The following equation demonstrates the low divergence angle of the collimated beam.
y1 2.5µm
Θ2 = = = .00002 rad , where:
f 114 .5mm
The necessary optical components for use with the spatial filter, based on the preceding
6
Once the incident beam has been filtered and expanded, the resulting beam is used as the
light source for a simple Mach-Zehnder interferometer. As seen in Figure 2, our test object
(intraocular lens) will be placed in the signal path of the interferometer. The lens will be
immersed in index matching fluid and placed in a cuvette mounted on a rotation stage during
testing. The output of the interferometer will be captured by a CCD camera, allowing us to
monitor and record the interference patterns for a given angular offset. Our goal is to have
visible interference patterns when the lens at 0° (incident light orthogonal to center of lens) and
7
Schedule of Work.
Week of 3-24:
Take inventory of available optical components for project experiment, and purchase
Week of 3-31:
Week of 4-6:
Week of 4-13:
necessary.
Week of 4-20:
Complete any unfinished lab work and verify functionality of interferometric system.
Week of 4-27:
8
Facilities, Equipment, and Other Resources
• Advanced Electronics Lab, Room 222, Tucker Technology Center, Texas Christian
• Applied Photonics Lab, Room 012, Tucker Technology Center, Texas Christian
f=15.29mm, 0.16 NA
9
References
1. G. M. Morris and L. T. Nordan, “Phakic Intraocular Lenses: the new focus in refractive
by use of computed tomography,” Appl. Opt., vol. 41, no. 25, pp. 5317-5325 (September
2002).
emphasis on future development,” Proceed. IEEE, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 356-372 (March 1983).
4. http://newport.com/store/genproduct.aspx?id=144910&lang=1033§ion=Summary, see
Appendix B.
B.
10