WMHD2020 v16 Resized PDF
WMHD2020 v16 Resized PDF
PATRON 6
HRH Princess Iman Afzan Al-Sultan Abdullah
6
SECTION A | Introduction 9
WFMH President’s Foreword
Dr Ingrid Daniels 10
How investment in primary care can promote access to mental health in primary care 61
Christopher Dowrick, Joseph Adekunle Ariba, Sandra Fortes, Kim Griswold, Pramendra
Prasad Gupta, Ryuki Kassai, Abdullah al-Khatami, Cindy Lam, Donald Li
The Value of Mental Health Peer Work: Increasing investment and access for all 81
Michael Burge OAM
Setting the Stage for peer support: the challenge for Chile 84
Olga Toro Devia, Matías Irarrázaval, Miguel Rojas, Ruben Alvarado
Clubhouse International: Expanding Resources for People with Serious Mental Illness 87
Joel D. Corcoran
The Recovery College and Well-Being – The Experience from Inner City London 92
Lucja Kolkiewicz, Edwin Ndlovu, Jessica Prakash, Dennis Shorunkeh-Sawyer, Imtaz
Khaliq, Joseph Thompson, Asha Abdillahi, Tahara Matin
SECTION C | Mental Health & COVID 19 100
Community activation, policy and COVID 19 101
Jane Desborough, Grant Blashki, Sally Hall, Ruth Vine, Christine Morgan, Mark Roddam,
Michael Kidd
COVID-19 and Employee Mental Health: The reality behind the rhetoric 134
Ina Rothmann, Christoffel Grobler, Cassey Chambers, Leon de Beer
Thanks 168
PATRON
I am proud to share that sentiments on mental health are changing in Malaysia. I have been humbled
time and time again by the efforts of my peers to push for a more holistic, whole-of-society approach to
mental health.
As Malaysia transitions out of its own lockdown, we have concluded that communities and society
at large could possibly be more fragmented and polarised if mental health reforms are not catalysed
- amongst different income groups, and amongst those newly experiencing mental health issues and
those who have pre-existing conditions. I am sure that this is not unique to Malaysia alone.
With efforts to decriminalise suicide underway back home, we are beginning to see some recognition
that investments in mental health should also be made by those beyond the mental health community.
Such investments need not be economic or financial, groundbreaking or revolutionary. Rather, these
investments are of our time, attention, love and compassion, all of which can be done out of our own
goodwill.
First, we can learn to have empathy for those suffering as well as their families. We can also improve
our mental health literacy as the spectrum is wide, with stark differences between mental health issues
and illnesses.
Second, we can uphold the basics of human interaction - emotional connection, face-to-face communi-
cation, kindness, understanding and thoughtfulness - to nurture mental resilience for those who need it
most.
Third, we can be mindful of the important role that communities play in fostering a sense of care and to-
getherness. By doing our part as members in society, I am confident we will raise awareness on mental
health and break its stigmatisation.
These investments are not purely the government’s responsibility, nor should doctors be the only answer
for those suffering. These investments are the responsibility of all. More importantly, they indicate that
we ourselves are an untapped resource in mental healthcare.
For without greater investment in mental health, we risk losing greater access to mental health.
In the time I have spent highlighting the challenges of mental health, it has become apparent that raising
public awareness comes hand in hand with ensuring accessible mental healthcare.
The task at hand is for us all to identify challenges that impede good mental healthcare practices; to
educate and train primary care providers and frontline staff with mental health first aid strategies; and to
improve the overall mental healthcare system to anticipate future needs such as a pandemic.
While COVID-19 has increased the spotlight on mental health, the stocktaking of how greater access to
mental healthcare can be improved must always be a continuous process. We can always do more to
strengthen mental health response and support in our communities.
Ultimately, mental health, quality of life and wellbeing should be seen as additional indicators of stan-
dards of living. This is the level that we should aspire to as we move towards the “new normal”.
I thank the World Federation for Mental Health for the opportunity to be Patron of World Mental Health
Day 2020.
My work thus far has focused on kick-starting a much-needed conversation in Malaysia on how we can
shape a more attentive and compassionate society. I am honoured to be working alongside the World
Federation for Mental Health and their partners to bring this conversation to greater heights on the glob-
al stage.
As the COVID-19 pandemic is forcing the entire world to reset and rebuild for a better tomorrow, it is my
hope that we too pause and reflect on what we would like our future to be.
The world as we know it has changed dramatically as we experience the unimaginable and unprec-
edented turmoil caused by the COVID-19 global health pandemic which has impacted on the mental
health of millions of people. We could never have imagined that a virus of this nature could wield such
devastation across nations. Hard and drastic lockdown measures implemented in many countries to
reduce COVID-19 transmissions, infections and deaths saw the enforcement of physical isolations and
distancing become a new reality disrupting natural social interactions. Parallel to emotional and health
implications large scale socio-economic fallout has been witnessed as markets and economies were
destabilised. The overwhelming impact of the virus revealed and exposed the deep inequalities and lev-
els of poverty experienced by many, particularly in lower – and middle income countries, causing further
mental distress and vulnerability. Pushed to the foreground was the exposure of many social ills such
as; racism, gender-based violence and many others.
The mental health consequences of COVID-19 superseded by an already overburdened mental health
landscape in which the number of people living with depression and or anxiety increased by nearly 50%
from 416 million to 615 million (WHO, 2016). We know that mental, neurological and substance use
disorders exact a high toll on health outcomes, accounting for 13% of the total global burden of disease
(WHO, 2012). One person in every four will be affected by a mental disorder at some stage of their lives.
The treatment gap remains large with 50% of people with mental disorders in high income countries and
85% of persons in low-and middle income countries having no access to treatment (WHO, 2012). Fragile
health systems have not been able to address or cope with the large treatments gaps and need for men-
tal health care. We have observed how delicate health systems are further stretched and challenged by
the increase in demand for mental health interventions as a result of the pandemic.
Sadly, the global denial and failure to invest in mental health over many years has resulted in a shameful
situation in which access to treatment has limited individuals’ rights to wellness and health which has
been exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. The inadequate response to invest and increase access to
mental health has resulted in gross failure to ensure that every global citizen can live fully integrated
lives. Mental health continues to be misunderstood, ignored, stigmatised, underfunded and overlooked.
COVID-19 has in many respects been an equalizer and has placed at the forefront the critical need for
good mental health interventions, responses and support during this time.
Taking our current reality and context into account the theme for World Mental Health Day could not
have come at a more appropriate time as a call to action becomes critical.
The United Nations (2020) states that, “Good mental health is critical to the functioning of society at the
best of times. It must be front and centre of every country’s response to and recovery from the COVID-19
pandemic. The mental health and wellbeing of whole societies have been severely impacted by this cri-
sis and are a priority to be addressed urgently” (UN, Policy Brief, 2020).
The World Economic Forum (2018) noted that mental health disorders are on the rise in every country
in the world and could cost the global economy up to $16 trillion between 2010 and 2030 if a collective
failure to respond is not addressed. We are faced with an international mental health crisis and have
been forewarned over the last two decades of this imminent catastrophe. Yet little movement has been
seen in shifting the mental health investment agenda despite the global return on investment analysis
and economic benefits. According to WHO’s “Mental Health Atlas 2014” survey, governments spend on
average 3% of their health budgets on mental health, ranging from less than 1% in low-income countries
to 5% in high-income countries. The value of investment needed over the period 2016–30 for scaling
up treatment, primarily psychosocial counselling and antidepressant medication, amounted to US$ 147
billion (Chisholm, et al, 2016).
Yet the returns far outweigh the costs. The WHO (2019) states that for every US$ 1 put into scaled up
treatment for common mental disorders, there is a return of US$ 4 in improved health and productivity.
“Despite hundreds of millions of people around the world living with mental disorders, mental health has
remained in the shadows,” said Jim Yong Kim, President of the World Bank Group. Despite a growth in
mental health awareness and case made mental health investment has been stagnant across the globe.
It is clear that greater movement and action needs to be seen within countries to increase access to
mental health for all.
World Mental Health Day is simply not a one day event and provides us with the opportunity and advan-
tage to hold the attention of governments, donors, policy-makers and all stakeholders to ensure action
for greater investment in mental health.
This year the call to action “greater investment in mental health” has to be headed and cannot be ignored
in the current COVID-19 pandemic environment. It is unquestionable that mental health is a human right
and thus, now more than ever, it’s time for mental health for all. Quality and accessible mental health
care is an undeniable right and part of the foundation for universal health coverage. Every nation – every
voice needs to move and call for greater investment in mental health. Our key activations over the next
few weeks through our coordinated efforts and activities with our collaborating partners will ensure that
this year we will have the greatest impact in shifting the investment in mental health agenda.
Our call is a simple one – let us hold hands and unify our voices in moving the mental health investment
agenda for increased focus and access to mental health and thereby making mental health a reality for
all – everyone, everywhere.
The Lancet Commission on Global Mental Health and Sustainable Development (2018) note that the
sustainable development goals are not achievable without making significant improvements to treating,
preventing and promoting mental health. They identify mental health as a humanitarian and develop-
ment priority, providing evidence that mental health is indeed at the centre of sustainable development.
We can thus conclude that there can be no sustainable development without mental health. There is still
time to limit the worse impact and consequences of inaction by being bold and investing in the mental
health of all.
Dr Ingrid Daniels
President WFMH
We now live in a time when the daily lives of people across the world have changed considerably due to
the COVID-19 pandemic. Many people are afraid of infection, dying, and losing family members. People
have been physically distanced from their support networks and many are grieving the deaths of loved
ones. Millions of people face economic turmoil, having lost or being at risk of losing their incomes and
livelihoods. Additionally, many specific populations continue to experience particularly challenging cir-
cumstances. Frontline health-care workers and first responders are continuously exposed to complex
stressors in often unprepared and overwhelmed health systems. People living with mental or physical
health conditions experience significant disruptions in their care. In every community, older adults, in-
cluding those with underlying health conditions or neurological conditions, remain uniquely vulnerable.
Children and adolescents also face disrupted education and ambiguity about their futures. Due to family
stress and social isolation, many have been exposed to higher rates of abuse or neglect. The impact of
these unprecedented uncertainties, occurring at critical points in their emotional and cognitive develop-
ment, cannot be understated.
Women are also bearing a heavy burden as a result of the pandemic. Gender-based violence is also
increasing as many women and girls endure confinement at home with their abusers while services to
support survivors have, in some cases, been disrupted..
Meanwhile, people caught in fragile humanitarian settings risk having their health and mental health
needs overlooked entirely. Due to tenuous health and social support systems, individuals in these areas
already experience limited access to mental health care and now face even greater adversity during
COVID-19.
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, almost 1 billion people were living with mental disorders and near-
ly US$ 1 trillion was lost annually in lost productivity due to depression and anxiety alone. Given past ex-
periences with public health emergencies, it is expected that these numbers will substantially increase
and the demand for mental health and psychosocial support will be greater than ever.
Taken together, these factors paint a striking portrait of urgent mental health needs across the world to-
day. Unfortunately, these needs are emphatically underscored by decades of chronic under-investment
in the mental health field, particularly in community-based services. On average, countries spend less
than 2% of their health budgets on mental health, with 80% of that expenditure going to mental health
hospitals. Furthermore, international development assistance for mental health is estimated to be less
than 1% of all development assistance for health. This is despite the fact that evidence-based care for
depression and anxiety alone brings a US$ 5 return on investment for every US$ 1 spent. Meanwhile, the
return for evidence-based drug dependence care may be as high as US$ 6.
Yet, despite these challenges, today we are presented with a historic opportunity to place mental health
high on the global agenda. Before COVID-19, mental health was gaining traction among global develop-
ment priorities encapsulated in the SDGs, in the international humanitarian field, and in the human rights
discourse. Then, in June 2020, a group of 95 countries sent a Joint Statement in support of the Secre-
tary-General’s Policy Brief on COVID-19 and the Need for Action on Mental Health to the 74th President of
the United Nations (UN) General Assembly and to the UN Secretary-General. The statement affirmed the
need for greater support for mental health and called for strategies to ensure that governments take the
actions necessary to mitigate the mental health impacts of COVID-19.
Now more than ever we must harness this momentum to move mental health forward. The UN Secre-
tary-General, in his policy brief on the need for action on mental health, recommended that countries
take three actions: 1) apply a whole-of-society approach to promote, protect and care for mental health;
2) ensure widespread availability of emergency mental health and psychosocial support; and 3) support
recovery from COVID-19 by building mental health services fit for the future. Fortunately, many of the
tools and approaches needed to enact these recommendations have already been outlined in WHO’s
Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan. However, to date, investment and implementation have re-
mained limited. This is why we must now take decisive action that shows mental health for all is not
merely a notion to tacitly support, but something that requires active engagement, practical commit-
ment and financial investment.
It gives me great pleasure as Secretary General and Chief Executive Officer of the World Federation for
Mental Health (WFMH) to thank each of you for your contribution to mental health advocacy, and partic-
ularly your support for World Mental Health Day, Saturday 10th October 2020.
WFMH was launched in London, UK in August 1948 at an International Congress on Mental Health. It
aimed to promote mental health and citizenship, mutual understanding through co-operation across
professional boundaries, the establishment of mental health services in every country of the world and
the promotion of education about mental health, with the aim of empowering people who deliver and
receive metal health services.
At its inception WFMH recognised the need to highlight excellence by awarding prizes for significant
research, scientific publications and outstanding initiative and excellence in mental health services to
inspire others and raise standards in mental health.
From the start WFMH pledged to lend their support and encouragement to the United Nations, to lobby
for Universities to establish Chairs of Mental Health and regional Institutes of Mental Health for re-
search, training, and public education.
We have seen much improvement in the standards and delivery of mental health care for many citizens
of the world since 1948, and the profile of mental health has been raised with the general public, but
there is still a long way to go.
This year’s coronavirus pandemic has affected everybody and highlighted how poorly prepared many
nation states are to address mental health wellbeing during a time of global crisis. The need for WFMH
is just as important today as it was in 1948.
This year’s World Mental Health Day theme ‘Mental health for all: greater investment – greater access’
provides us with an opportunity to re-affirm the founding principles of the World Federation for Mental
Health. The WFMH family cannot achieve this alone. Every one of us has to play our part.
We continue to need each other in the same spirit of collaboration, and we need to work across tradi-
tional boundaries as we did in 1948, forging alliances that can work together to ensure that we achieve
mental health for all. Mental health matters.
I have become Secretary-General and CEO of WFMH at a difficult time and face many challenges, some
similar to those faced by citizens in 1948. History tells us that by working together we can overcome our
challenges and difficulties and build a better society.
I am grateful to previous Secretary Generals who have gone before including J.R. Rees (1948-1961),
Francois Cloutier (1962-1965), Pierre Visseur (1965-1967), G.M. Carstairs (1968-1972), Michael Beau-
brun (1972-1974), Tsung-yi Lin (1975-1979), Robert Beiser (1979-1983), Eugene Brody (1983-1999),
Preston Garrison (2002-2009) and Vijay Krishna Ganju (2010 -2012).
I am very grateful to the Officers and President of WFMH, and all our individual and institutional mem-
bers for your continued support.
World Mental Health Day established in 1992 would not have become a reality but for the work of Rich-
ard (Dick) Hunter, the Deputy Secretary General of the World Federation for Mental Health. Richard Hunt-
er built on the goodwill of many to ensure that our annual World Mental Health Day celebration on 10th
October became a reality. With Richard Leighton a television producer he made a global telecast the
central feature of worldwide activities. Subsequently the World Health Organization agreed to become a
co-sponsor, and the project was also supported by the Carter Center, when former U.S. First Lady Rosa-
lynn Carter agreed to become Honorary Chair of the event.
World Mental Health Day has helped to improve global mental health literacy. I call on all media outlets
and social media to join us to publicise this year’s theme ‘Mental health for all: greater investment –
greater access,’ and I ask citizens, policy makers and those who pay for services to play their part.
No-one is immune from mental distress we all need each other. Mental health matters.
#mentalhealhtmatters
REFERENCE
• Eugene B. Brody. The Search for Mental Health. A History & Memoir of WFMH 1948-1997. ISBN0-683-18346-X
DUSHANKA V. KLEINMAN2
DDS, MScD
1- President, HealthPartners Institute Chief Science Officer, Health Partners. Minneapolis, Minnesota. nico.p.pronk@health-
partners.com
2- Professor and Associate Dean for Research University of Maryland School of Public Health. Washington, DC. dushanka@
umd.edu
Vision
A society in which all people achieve their full potential for health and well-being across the lifespan.
Mission
To promote and evaluate the nation’s effort to improve the health and well- being of its people.
Foundational Principles
• Health and well-being of the population and communities are essential to a fully functioning, equitable society.
• Achieving the full potential for health and well-being for all provides valuable benefits to society, including lower
health care costs and more prosperous and engaged individuals and communities.
• Achieving health and well-being requires eliminating health disparities, achieving health equity, and attaining health
literacy. 2
• Healthy physical, social and economic environments strengthen the potential to achieve health and well-being.
• Promoting and achieving the nation’s health and well-being is a shared responsibility that is distributed among all
stakeholders at the national, state, and local levels, including the public, profit, and not-for-profit sectors.
• Working to attain the full potential for health and well-being of the population is a component of decision-making
and policy formulation across all sectors.
• Investing to maximize health and well-being for the nation is a critical and efficient use of resources.
Overarching Goals
The framework’s foundational principles highlight the physical, mental and social health dimensions that
comprise the linked efforts of promoting health and well-being and preventing disease (See Box 1). The
focus on achieving health equity and eliminating health disparities is continued to be emphasized and
there is added visibility for attaining health literacy. Furthermore, the need for shared responsibility is
highlighted by stressing the need for multiple diverse sectors to work together across various settings.
Finally, a broad perspective and integrated view of health and well-being considerations is proposed in
decision-making and policy formulation.
We believe it is no coincidence that the World Federation of Mental Health (WFMH) was formed the year
the World Health Organization (WHO) was established, with the definition of health included into the
preamble of its constitution (1948). The WHO definition of health –“the complete state of physical, men-
tal and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” – continues to inspire the
Healthy People initiative. To further stimulate actions to promote health and recognize the importance
of addressing the impact of the determinants of health, “well-being” was added to encompass aspects
beyond physical and mental conditions. Well-being is comprised of multiple elements, some of which
overlap with health, but also includes “emotional, social, financial, occupational, intellectual and spiritual
elements.” Health and well-being are defined in Healthy People 2030 as “how people think, feel and func-
tion – at a personal and social level – and how they evaluate their lives as a whole” (2). For individuals
and communities to achieve their full potential for “health and well-being” the active involvement and
collaboration among diverse stakeholders is required. It is through their collective impact that health
and well-being can be best addressed.
Health and well-being is regarded as a single term and describes separate but related states, i.e., health
influences well-being, and, conversely, well-being affects health. Health is considered to include a per-
son’s physical and mental condition whereas well-being encompasses additional states of being and
aspects of life such as security, prosperity, sense of connection, and purpose (3-5). Well-being may be
considered both a determinant and outcome of health (6). For many people, well-being is a more uni-
fying and motivating pursuit than health. How people think, feel, and function reflects an integration of
body, mind, and spirit and recognizes the interdependency of each state with the others. For instance,
how we think influences how we feel, and how we feel influences how we function (7). Additionally, the
health and well-being definition operates at more than a single level. Multiple determinants affect health
and well-being and, as proposed in the framework, such influences come from within each person as
well as from the social, physical, and economic environments and settings in which people are born, live,
learn, work, play, worship, and age.
Promotion of “health and well-being” requires an understanding of a society’s values and the pursuit of
equitable living conditions. A multisectorial approach across the nation and its communities is needed
to achieve health and well-being. The behavioral, psychosocial, socioeconomic, cultural and political
circumstances of our populations need to be considered when health and well-being are the desired
outcomes. The underlying “causes of the causes” of poor health include mental health considerations
and call for an emphasis on psychological and social support and resources in order to make progress.
Stress, social exclusion and social gradient, as well as essential elements, such as food, housing, and
transportation need prioritization and focused attention.
Mental Health
The Healthy People initiative is a science-based roadmap with specific measurable goals and objectives
with targets to guide the action of individuals, communities and stakeholders to improve health. Since
its launch in 1980, each iteration of Healthy People, including Healthy People 2000, Healthy People
2010, Healthy People 2020, and Healthy People 2030, has included objectives related to mental health.
Each decade the extent and scope of issues relevant to mental health have grown. While the initial
1990 topics did not specifically mention mental health, topics such as the control of stress and violent
behavior and misuse of alcohol and drugs were included. A more formal focus on mental health and
mental disorders followed in each subsequent decade. In Healthy People 2010 and Healthy People
2020 mental health also was selected as a Leading Health Indicator, one of a small set of high priority
objectives. Concurrently topics aligned with mental health also grew in number. In Healthy People 2020,
the objectives related to mental health included access to health services, adolescent health, injury and
violence prevention, substance abuse, and education and community-based programs. Healthy People
2030 pivots from a focus on “health” by itself to a focus on health and well-being” and includes a topic
area dedicated to mental health with fourteen Core Objectives, one Developmental Objective, and two
Research Objectives. Table 1 presents the Healthy People 2030 Mental Health and Mental Disorders
objectives, their baseline and targets, data sources, and additional contextual information.
Table 1: Healthy People 2030 Mental Health and Social Determinants of Health
Objectives
Core Objectives
Objective Target-Setting
Final ID Short Title Baseline Statement Target Data Source
Statement Method
MHMD- Reduce the Reduce the 14.2 suicides per 12.8 per Percent improve- National Vital
01W suicide rate suicide rate 100,000 population 100,000 ment Statistics Sys-
occurred in 2018 tem - Mortality
(age adjusted to (NVSS-M), CDC/
the year 2000 stan- NCHS; Popula-
dard population) tion Estimates,
Census
Objective Target-Setting
Final ID Short Title Baseline Statement Target Data Source
Statement Method
MHMD-02 Reduce Reduce sui- 2.4 suicide 1.8 per 100 Minimal statisti- Youth Risk Be-
suicide cide attempts attempts per cal significance havior Surveil-
attempts by adoles- 100 population lance System
by adoles- cents of students in (YRBSS), CDC/
cents grades 9 through NCHHSTP
12 occurred in the
past 12 months, as
reported in 2017
MHMD-03 Increase Increase the 73.3 percent of chil- 82.4 per- Projection National Health
the pro- proportion of dren aged 4 to 17 cent Interview Survey
portion of children with years with mental (NHIS), CDC/
children mental health health problems NCHS
with mental problems who received treatment
health get treatment in 2018
problems
who receive
treatment
MHMD-04 Increase Increase the 64.1 percent of 68.8 per- Percentage point National Survey
the pro- proportion of adults aged 18 cent improvement on Drug Use and
portion of adults with years and over with Health (NSDUH),
adults with serious men- SMI received treat- SAMHSA
serious tal illness who ment in 2018
mental ill- get treatment
ness (SMI)
who receive
treatment
MHMD-05 Increase Increase the 64.8 percent of 69.5 per- Percentage point National Survey
the pro- proportion of adults aged 18 cent improvement on Drug Use and
portion adults with years and over with Health (NSDUH),
of adults depression MDEs received SAMHSA
with major who get treat- treatment in the
depressive ment past 12 months, as
episodes reported in 2018
(MDEs)
who receive
treatment
MHMD-06 Increase Increase the 41.4 percent of 46.4 per- Percentage point National Survey
the propor- proportion of adolescents aged cent improvement on Drug Use and
tion of ad- adolescents 12 to 17 years with Health (NSDUH),
olescents with depres- MDEs received SAMHSA
with major sion who get treatment in the
depressive treatment past 12 months, as
episodes reported in 2018
(MDEs)
who receive
treatment
Objective Target-Setting
Final ID Short Title Baseline Statement Target Data Source
Statement Method
MHMD-07 Increase Increase the 3.4 percent of 8.2 percent Minimal statisti- National Survey
the pro- proportion of adults aged 18 cal significance on Drug Use and
portion of people with years and over Health (NSDUH),
persons substance with co-occurring SAMHSA
with co-oc- use and substance use
curring sub- mental health disorders and
stance use disorders who mental health
disorders get treatment disorders received
and mental for both both mental health
health care and specialty
disorders substance use
who receive treatment in 2018
treatment
for both
disorders
13.5 percent
MHMD-08 Increase the Increase the 8.5 percent of Minimal statisti- National Ambula-
proportion proportion of primary care office cal significance tory Medical Care
of primary primary care visits included Survey (NAMCS),
care office visits where screening for de- CDC/NCHS
visits where adolescents pression in persons
adoles- and adults are aged 12 years and
cents and screened for over in 2016
adults are depression
screened
for depres-
sion
Developmental Objectives
MHMD-D01 Increase the number of youth with serious emotional distur- Increase the number of children and adolescents with
bance (SED) who are identified and receive treatment serious emotional disturbance who get treatment
Research Objectives
MHMD-R01 Increase the proportion of homeless adults with mental Increase the proportion of homeless adults with mental
health problems who receive mental health services health problems who get mental health services
Core Objectives
SDOH-01 Reduce the Reduce the proportion of 11.8 percent of persons 8.0 Projection Current Population
proportion people living in poverty were living below the per- Survey Annual Social
of persons poverty threshold in cent and Economic Sup-
living in 2018 plement (CPS-ASEC),
poverty Census and
DOL/BLS
SDOH-02 Increase Increase employment in 70.6 percent of the 75.0 Percentage Current Population
employment working-age people working-age population per- point improve- Survey Annual Social
among the aged 16 to 64 years cent ment and Economic Sup-
working-age were employed in 2018 plement (CPS-ASEC),
population Census and
DOL/BLS
SDOH-03 Increase the Increase the proportion 77.9 percent of children 85.1 Projection Current Population
proportion of children living with at aged 17 years and under per- Survey Annual Social
of children least 1 parent who works were living with at least cent and Economic Sup-
living with at full time 1 parent employed year plement (CPS-ASEC),
least 1 par- round, full time in 2017 Census and
ent employed DOL/BLS
year round,
full time
SDOH-04 Reduce the Reduce the proportion 34.6 percent of families 25.5 Percentage American Housing
proportion of families that spend spent more than 30 per- point improve- Survey (AHS), HUD &
of families more than 30 percent of percent of income on cent ment Census
that spend income on housing housing in 2017
more than
30 percent
of income on
housing
SDOH-05 Reduce the Reduce the proportion of 7.7 percent of children 5.2 Percentage National Survey of
proportion of children with a parent or aged 17 years and under per- point improve- Children’s Health
children who guardian who has served had ever experienced cent ment (NSCH), HRSA/MCHB
have ever time in jail a parent or guardian
experienced serving time in jail in
a parent or 2016-17
guardian who
has served
time in jail
SDOH-06 Increase the Increase the proportion 69.1 percent of high 73.7 Projection Current Population
proportion of of high school graduates school completers were per- Survey (CPS), Census
high school in college the October enrolled in college the cent and DOL/BLS
completers after graduating October immediately
who were after completing high
enrolled in school in 2018
college the
October
immediately
after com-
pleting high
school
Research Objectives
SDOH-R01 Increase the proportion of federal data sources that Increase the proportion of federal data sources that include
collect country of birth as a variable country of birth
The year 2020 marks not only the launch of Healthy People 2030, but also a year during which there
has been an unprecedented effect on global health and well-being resulting from the global impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic and protests against structural racism and discrimination. These and oth-
er challenges only strengthen our resolve of the need to support collective efforts to achieve health
and well-being. WFMH is well positioned to provide essential awareness, advocacy and preventive and
treatment services for mental health concerns and Healthy People 2030 can be a well-aligned effort to
accomplish our shared goals.
REFERENCES
Introduction
COVID-19 and associated economic and social unrest pose an ongoing global challenge to mental
health. Early evidence from many countries suggests increased rates of mental distress both directly as
a result of COVID-19 anxiety and trauma and from the indirect impact of economic crises1 2. More than
ever there is a need to improve access to psychological therapies, given the known evidence of their
effectiveness for a range of mental health problems and distress3.
Despite the pressure on health services and the trauma to individuals, the current crisis has also demon-
strated opportunities to introduce innovation and enhance existing ways of accessing mental health
care.
The quarantine and lockdown which has been a feature of COVID-19 has produced an increased interest
in providing remote and virtual access to health care in many different countries and contexts including
mental health4.
Now, more than ever there is a need to increase access to psychological therapies and consider how
innovations can enhance their reach and effectiveness.
In many countries the last decade has seen a strengthening of psychological therapy services. In the
UK for example the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service5 led to a significant in-
crease in the use of psychological therapists and evidence of both clinical and economic benefits6. The
1- Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the
2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International journal of environmental
research and public health 2020;17(5):1729.
2- Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: a review.
International Journal of Surgery 2020
3- Bower P, Gilbody S. Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency: narrative literature re-
view. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2005;186(1):11-17.
4- Shore JH, Schneck CD, Mishkind MC. Telepsychiatry and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic—Current and Future
Outcomes of the Rapid Virtualization of Psychiatric Care. JAMA psychiatry 2020.
5- Clark DM. Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT
experience. International review of psychiatry 2011;23(4):318-27.
6- Clark DM. Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annual Review
UK has also developed a Child and Youth model of IAPT (CYP- IAPT to address the needs of younger
people7.
In 2019 the Ministry of Health commissioned a pilot service delivery initiative designed to increase the
access of young people aged 18-25 years to a range of integrated psychological therapies and supports
within an existing stepped care model in primary care8. The initiative was named ‘Piki ‘, an indigenous
Māori word meaning both to support or aid, and to climb or ascend.
• Co-design with service users and between multiple partners engaged in the project.
• The introduction of ‘peer to peer’ interactions and therapeutic engagement.
• The use of a digital platform and App, which is used for data collection, but also as a therapy option
for the project.
• An evaluation methodology that would allow feedback at multiple time points during the project
timeframe and enable ‘course corrections’ to the project.
• A major focus on equity of access to services especially for hard to reach communities, and empha-
sis on self-management skills and resilience.
Co-design
An important innovation of Piki is the use of co-design principles in the development, implementation
and evaluation of the project9. Co-design with both service users and the multiple partners in the project
was used in developing measurement requirements for clinical practice and evaluation, marketing and
ongoing modification of service user pathways.
The evaluation team is utilising a co-produced approach to the evaluation with an equal number of the
team being service user academics, and support from the youth service user advisory group10.
Input from youth and service users was via two routes. A service user reference group was created to
support the co-design process, with a specific focus on evaluation. Its members are youth with lived
experience of mental distress and experience of primary care services as a result. A Youth Reference
Group provides more general advice in terms of youth culture, environment, communication, accessibi-
lity and marketing.
The spirit of co-design has remained strong but there is recognition of tension between delivering a
project from a platform of existing services and a set menu of innovation, compared with adopting new
directions and priorities identified through the co-design process.
In a project dedicated to improving service to young people it has been important to listen to the voice
of the youth reference groups when they have felt they were not heard, and when it was felt that funda-
mental aspects of the model of care had already been decided.
Piki has been integrated with general practice, Youth One Stop Shops, and tertiary institutions to allow
onsite service delivery, immediate booking and short waiting times.
The project operates around a digital platform consists of an App and a website. The App includes di-
rect access to the clinical assessment and outcome measures as well as psychological therapy session
outcomes. It also provides resources, including tracking tools, a mood diary, an online community, and
a facility for therapists and clients to message each other.
10- Gordon S, Dowell T, Fedchuk D, et al. Reflections on allyship in the context of a co-produced evaluation of a youth-integrat-
ed therapies mental health intervention. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2020:1-15.
As with many projects there can be a tension in prioritising between different groups; in this case initially
managing the high volume demand from a large student population in the project catchment area. Spe-
cific text and social media marketing to Māori and Pacific together with local appointment of additional
Māori and Pacific workforce has helped redress the balance.
Early in project development a peer to peer organisation worked with the service users group, and with
Māori and Pasifika groups to co-design the peer-to-peer service developing a programme designed to
see clients for an average of six to ten weeks.
Successful peer support development involved negotiating a number of issues including procedures for
safety nets for self-harm or suicide ideation and how peer supporters
Conclusion
This youth mental health project contains a number of innovations and ambitious service integration
objectives, which make it a case study with potential useful learning for both local national and interna-
tional scenarios.
11- Asad S, Chreim S. Peer support providers’ role experiences on interprofessional mental health care teams: A qualitative
study. Community mental health journal 2016;52(7):767-74.
Piki has demonstrated it is possible to successfully initiate new innovation from a platform of business
as usual services in a relatively short time frame, and to use principles of co-design, and acknowledge-
ment of complexity and appreciative inquiry12 to negotiate tensions and challenges. Acknowledgement
of that complexity provides further learning for scale up of such initiatives since particularly in a post
COVID-19 world unexpected issues will arrive and while some of these are likely to be identifiable at an
early planning stage, many others will be ‘predictably unpredictable’.
A major contributor to the success of Piki so far has been the willingness of many different partners to
work with service users and to continue to cooperate on a project with many strands of complexity. This
has been achieved by trying to have core values of kindness and compassion at the heart of all activity.
Piki Evaluation Team. Tony Dowell, Maria Stubbe, Sarah Gordon Fiona Mathieson, Dasha Fedchuk , Trac-
ey Gardiner, Sue Garrett, Jo Hilder & Rachel Tester
12- Dowell AC, Menning L, MacDonald N, et al. An evolution in thinking to support the post 2020 global vaccine strategy: The
application of complexity and implementation science. Vaccine 2019;37(31):4236-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vac-
cine.2019.05.096
The UK National Health Service (NHS) programme to improve access to psychological therapies (IAPT)
has created talking therapy services in every locality in England. People can refer themselves directly to
their local service and receive evidence-based psychological treatment for their common mental health
condition and over half recover from their condition.
The necessary investment to achieve this working age population wide intervention delivers a substan-
tial return on investment. In addition to improved quality of life and income, a government saving of
£13,382 per person returning to work at 2020 prices (Baah, 2017) at an average 2020 adjusted treat-
ment cost of £1,011 per person (Radhakrishnan et al., 2013). With similar benefits for those retaining
employment and improving productivity.
IAPT Services provide access to evidence-based psychological interventions for common mental health
conditions, specifically depression and anxiety disorders. This is centrally funded on the basis that this
is cost-effective for the government (Bell et al., 2006). Interventions range in intensity from low intensity
(consisting mainly a guided self-help and computerised CBT) to standard high-intensity psychologi-
cal interventions (mainly formal one-to-one structured psychological interventions). Most interventions
come from cognitive behavioural therapy (this formulates mental ill-health as a disorder of behaviour
and thinking patterns and seeks to enable the person to become self-sufficient in identifying and altering
these). They also include dynamic interpersonal therapy, counselling for depression, and couple therapy
for depression.
• IAPT Services received over 1.5 million referrals each year aiming to reach 1.9 by 2023/24.
• IAPT currently delivers access to 20% of the English population with depression or an anxiety disor-
der.
• Patients received on average seven sessions of therapy
• The did not attend rate for appointments was 10-11%.
• Over 99% complete outcome measures.
• About one third received low-intensity therapy.
• About one quarter received high-intensity therapy.
• About 2/5ths received both low and high-intensity therapy.
• Over 70% showed a “reliable improvement” on their outcome measures.
• Using first and last observation carried forward, the proportion that no longer exceeded cut-off on
both the measure of depression and an anxiety measure began at around 45% in 2013 and gradually
increased reaching 52% in 2019 (recovery rate).
• The average wait for assessment is around 20 days with over 87% of people waiting less than 6
weeks.
1- https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/search/IAPT
Successful Demonstration sites (Clark et al., 2009) created the final clinical model, and subsequent re-
finement was captured in an IAPT manual2 enabling services to configure consistently and effectively.
Commercially developed electronic health records (IAPTus and PCMIS) were critical in enabling large
volume provision with routine data collection. A centrally agreed and mandated data collection frame-
work minimised the digital overhead and ensured directly comparable outcome measures which must
be submitted by every service each month through a central digital portal. Managing these complex sys-
tems is supported by real time data reports built into the clinical systems. The image below is a retime
performance dashboard from IAPTus provided by Mayden Health Ltd.
2- https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/iapt-manual-v4.pdf
The workforce workstream supporting IAPT has been a substantial undertraining. Central funding sup-
ported the provision of paid-for courses with fixed-term employment for trainees in services where
many subsequently work. In July 2017 there were 5,200 clinicians and 2600 non-clinical staff support
services3. A substantial proportion of the clinicians were trained by the programme. Staff continue to
receive expert supervision and ongoing professional development to create an effective workforce, this
underpins both the capability and capacity of the programme.
IAPT Services are funded locally with an allocation from the centre. Each service is locally commis-
sioned, usually through a competitive tender, for a fixed term (usually a three year) renewable contract.
Contracts are open to statutory, commercial or charitable providers working alone or in collaboration.
Failing services can expect to lose their contract as can successful services if they are insufficiently
competitive. While creating a rigorous, highly competitive marketplace, it also suppressed collaboration
and rarely encouraged bad actors to play the system to the detriment of patient care.
3- https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Stepping%20forward%20to%20202021%20-%20The%20mental%20
health%20workforce%20plan%20for%20england.pdf
Engagement
Nationally about 30% of referrals do not progress to an appointment and about 38% complete a course
of treatment. Ensuring engagement is critical because early drop out is strongly associated with non-re-
covery. Speed is key (Clark et al., 2018), during the working week RWS contacts patients on the day of
referral and offers a telephone assessment within 4 days this reduces disengagement to 20%.
Capacity
In addition to managing high volume flow, the demand to provide a longer duration of treatment, due to
complexity or needs arising from social isolation, often exceeds capacity. While post-traumatic stress
disorder, social phobia and body dysmorphic disorder currently require direct high-intensity CBT. For
other conditions, RWS asks people to attend educational seminars to teach core knowledge about their
condition and initiate self-treatment. Non-responders proceed to intensive CBT groups and if necessary,
to formal individual treatment. This approach enables the same resource to provide a maximum of 40
hours of treatment over 6 months rather than a more usual 12 hours over 3 months and waiting times
for treatment of weeks rather than months. Over 90% of people completing this programme achieve full
recovery. The RWS high level care pathway flow is shown below.
Staff Wellbeing
The low-intensity provision was originally intended to be delivered by emotionally intelligent laypeople
following a training course (Richards, David & Suckling, 2008), is now seen as an entry-level position
for psychology graduates and career progression creates high staff turnover. IAPT staff in general ex-
perience high pressure from large volumes and an expectation that they will deliver evidence-based
treatments that conform closely to the original research. A clear expectation of 20 hours minimum of
direct clinical contact each week (37.5 hours) helps maintain the balance of ever-increasing institutional
demands with professional wellbeing.
While we can be confident that CBT has long term effectiveness (Wiles et al., 2016), openly accessible
IAPT services frequently respond to needs from recurrent (often non-responding) and complex patients
who need specialist care or are treatment refractory. Specialist services are often structurally inaccessi-
ble and organised around low volume provision. RWS has managed these frequent interface problems
by calling a virtual interface meeting with clinical representatives from other providers to address both
individual patient’s needs and inter-organisational issues.
Summary
Delivering IAPT has been a herculean undertaking that every year delivers access to evidence-based
psychological therapy to nearly 3% of the English population. Over 50% of those treated make a recovery
giving a substantial return on investment with benefits to the individual and society. At 2020 prices IAPT
costs £1,011 per person and each person returning to work delivers a government saving of £13,382
with similar benefits for those retaining work and recovering productivity.
REFERENCES
• Baah, B. (2017). Movement Into Employment: Return on Investment Tool Estimation of benefits from moving an individ-
ual from unemployment into sustainable employment. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/
system/uploads/attachment_data/file/772596/Movement_into_employment_report_v1.2.pdf
• Bell, S., Clark, D., Knapp, M., Layard, R., Meacher, M., Priebe, S., Thornicroft, G., Turnberg, L., & Wright, B. (2006). The De-
pression Report, A New Deal for Depression and Anxiety Disorders. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/special/depres-
sionreport.pdf
• Clark, D. M., Canvin, L., Green, J., Layard, R., Pilling, S., & Janecka, M. (2018). Transparency about the outcomes of mental
health services (IAPT approach): an analysis of public data. The Lancet, 391(10121), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(17)32133-5
• Clark, D. M., Layard, R., Smithies, R., Richards, D. A., Suckling, R., & Wright, B. (2009). Improving access to psychological
therapy: Initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 910–920. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.010
• Radhakrishnan, M., Hammond, G., Jones, P. B., Watson, A., McMillan-Shields, F., & Lafortune, L. (2013). Cost of Improv-
ing Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme: An analysis of cost of session, treatment and recovery in
selected Primary Care Trusts in the East of England region. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51(1), 37–45. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.10.001
• Richards, David, A., & Suckling, R. (2008). IAPT Doncaster Demonstration Site Organisational Model | Enhanced Reader.
Clinical Psychology Forum, 181, 9–16.
• Wiles, N. J., Thomas, L., Turner, N., Garfield, K., Kounali, D., Campbell, J., Kessler, D., Kuyken, W., Lewis, G., Morrison, J., Wil-
liams, C., Peters, T. J., & Hollinghurst, S. (2016). Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioural
therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in primary care: Follow-up of the CoBalT
randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00495-2
WOLFGANG SPIEGEL
Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. [email protected]
CHRISTOS LIONIS
Vice Chair WONCA Working Party for Mental Health; Professor of General Practice and Primary Care, University of
Crete, Greece. [email protected]
JUAN M. MENDIVE:
Treasurer WONCA Working Party for Mental Health; Family Physician. La Mina Primary Health Care Academic Cen-
tre. University of Barcelona. [email protected]
Introduction
In this paper we offer a framework for systematic thinking about health literacy and discuss important
issues in relation to mental health.
When considering mental health, the World Health Organisation’s definition is a useful starting point for
considering literacy in this health field:
1- https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
2- Galderisi S, Heinz A, Kastrup M, Beezhold J, Sartorius N. Toward a new definition of mental health. World Psychiatry 2015;
14(2): 231-3.
Health literacy, according to Don Nutbeam: is “the capacity to obtain, interpret and understand health in-
formation and services in ways that are health enhancing. It involves the cognitive and social skills which
determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access, to understand and use information, in
ways which promote and maintain good health”3.
For the National Library of Medicine, health literacy is the degree to which individuals have the capacity
to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate
health decisions.4
The theme “investing in mental health literacy” can be seen from various perspectives. “Literacy” de-
scribes a state which follows a process. The process is formal or informal learning of the learner or
formal or informal education. Formal education needs to be organised and delivered (implemented) and
thus can be seen as an “investment” of man-power, brain-power, resources and money. Who is investing
in mental health literacy? Are patients doing it? Are health professionals? Or are other key players taking
part in that role, such as educators or health policy makers? Wouldn’t that be the responsibility of health
authorities or politicians? What is the role of the whole community in its vision towards mental health
literacy?
Health services have an obligation to be literate about the needs of the patients they seek to serve.
Moreover, health practitioners have to take account of how a population itself considers mental health
as a continuous state from normality to an illness state, and how mental wellbeing can be promoted
from primary care and community services.
Health literacy is in part related to educational and motivational attainment, since it is not only related
with the ability of individuals to gain access to the health information but to understand and use it. In ad-
dition, and importantly, it is about the stigma associated with seeking help for mental health problems.
Health literacy is critical for patients’ confidence in themselves and the services they seek (or often do
3- Nutbeam D. Health promotion glossary. Health Promot Int 1998: 13(4): 349-364.
4- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=health+literacy
not seek) to access. Evidence also suggests that vulnerable and disadvantaged people are usually at
risk of limited health literacy.5,6
For health professionals and health system managers, it is necessary to consider a wide range of issues.
It is common for health professionals to have some ideas about factors affecting patient help-seeking
behaviours7, including the significance of individual personality and their sense of resilience. Many of us
may also be able to apply principles of health promotion to enhance patient mental health literacy. But
we need to do much more than this. Individuals with mental health disorders use several sources to gain
information about their health and illness, including that of internet in order to make appropriate health
decisions, known as eHealth literacy. Evidence suggests the eHealth literacy is low in several settings,
and recommendations to improve it and access suitable information have been reported8,9.
In addition to awareness of stigma in the perceptions of patients and carers10 and also (far too com-
monly) in the minds of health professionals themselves11, health care providers need to appreciate the
multitude of different ways in which health, disease and mental illness are understood across ethnicities
and cultures. We need to be aware of patient beliefs and concepts about health and illness, including
their religious and spiritual beliefs, and the idioms they may use in expressing their distress12, and ask
them to what extent they have understood, critically appraised and use the information they have found;
and whether they are capable of using this information to make appropriate decisions to maintain or im-
prove their health. We need also to reflect on our own views about the aetiology of mental illness, most
often a combination of biological, psychological and social factors, and consider how these may agree
with or differ from our patients’ perspective on the determinants of mental illness13. This communica-
tion and motivation process is anticipated to improve the doctor-patient relationship and enhance the
therapeutic effect of the consultation.
5- Knighton AJ, Brunisholz KD, Savitz ST. Detecting risk of low health literacy in disadvantaged populations using area-based
measures. EGEMS (Wash DC), 2017; 5(3):7-10.
6- Sorensen K, Pelikan JM, Rothlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the
European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health 2015; 25(6): 1053-1058.
7- Fuller J, Edwards J, Procter N, Moss J. How definition of mental health problems can influence help seeking in rural and
remote communities. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2000; 8(3): 148-53.
8- Athanasopoulou C, Välimäki M, Koutra K, Löttyniemi E, Bertsias A, Basta M, Vgontzas AN, Lionis C. Internet use, eHealth
literacy and attitudes toward computer/internet among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional
study in two distant European regions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 20;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0531-
4.PMID: 28931385
9- Athanasopoulou C, Hätönen H, Suni S, Lionis C, Griffiths KM, Välimäki M. An analysis of online health information
on schizophrenia or related conditions: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak.2013 Aug 30;13:98. doi:
10.1186/1472-6947-13-98.PMID: 23992448
10- Boardman F, Griffiths F, Kokanovic R, Potiriadis M, Dowrick C, Gunn J. Resilience as a response to the stigma of depres-
sion: a mixed methods analysis. J Affect Disord. 2011;135(1-3):267-276. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.007
11- Ubaka CM, Chikezie CM, Amorha KC, Ukwe CV. Health Professionals‘ Stigma towards the Psychiatric Ill in Nigeria. Ethiop
J Health Sci. 2018;28(4):483-494. doi:10.4314/ejhs.v28i4.14
12- Nichter M. Idioms of distress revisited. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2010;34:401–16.
13- Karasz A, Dowrick C, Byng R, et al. What we talk about when we talk about depression: doctor-patient conversations and
treatment decision outcomes. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(594):e55-e63. doi:10.3399/bjgp12X616373
Awareness of mental health stigma is part of the work needed to address mental health literacy as
broadly as possible. This includes not only primary health care services, but also other population-based
services that can develop positive messages towards mental health including mass-media14. It is im-
portant to consider the role of health professionals in education at different society levels, including
school or institutes15, Existing evidence has shown this positively impacts on population views towards
mental health16.
We also need to be aware of the impact of the health systems within which health care providers are
operating. These are radically different in high- and low-resource settings, or in fee-for-service versus
open-access systems. Therefore, the health literacy required of both health professionals and patients
in successful navigating these systems will also be radically different, depending on the setting.
Case studies
Experiences in high-income settings
Conducted in north-west England, the AMP programme was designed to enhance mutual health literacy
between health providers and service users in four disadvantaged localities, with a focus on the mental
health needs of older people and minority ethnic populations. This involved a multi-faceted model with
three elements: community engagement, primary care quality and tailored psychosocial interventions.
Community engagement involved information gathering, community champions and focus groups and
a community working group. Primary Care teams were offered an interactive training package including
knowledge transfer, systems review and active linking. A culturally sensitive wellbeing intervention was
tested for feasibility and acceptability for ethnic minority and older people17. The combined effects of
the model included enhanced awareness of the psychosocial intervention amongst community organ-
isations, and increased referral by GPs. Primary care practitioners valued community information gath-
ering and access to the AMP psychosocial interventions18.
Two experiences from Catalonia are presented here, as example of coordination from different services
to achieve a better knowledge of mental health literacy and avoiding stigma.
14- Rubio-Valera M, Fernandez A, Evans-Lacko S, Luciano J V., Thornicroft G, Aznar-Lou I, Serrano-Blanco A: Impact of the
mass-media OBERTAMENT campaign on the levels of stigma among the Catalan population, Spain. 2015.
15- Casañas, R., Arfuch, V., Castellví, P. et al. “EspaiJove.net”- a school-based intervention programme to promote mental
health and eradicate stigma in the adolescent population: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public
Health 18, 939 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5855-1
16- Aznar-Lou et al. BMC Public Health (2016) 16:127 DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2815-5
17- Lovell K, Lamb J, Gask L, et al. Development and evaluation of culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions for un-
der-served people in primary care. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:217. Published 2014 Aug 1. doi:10.1186/s12888-014-0217-8
18- Dowrick C, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, et al. Evaluating a complex model designed to increase access to high quality prima-
ry mental health care for under-served groups: a multi-method study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:58. Published 2016 Feb
17. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1298-5
In the Republic of South Sudan, particularly in rural areas, people often have a very different understand-
ing of mental health. A person presenting psychopathology would rather be regarded as being a victim
of “juju”, a kind of voodoo, than exposing a psychiatric disorder. They would tend to turn to a juju-healer,
usually addressed as “doctor” there. A physician, rarely available for village dwellers, would have to be in
such high esteem that patients would expect him to be “more powerful” than the magician.
However, the question arises to which extent western trained health personnel, organisations, sponsors
and governments are entitled to impose a western understanding of mental health and psychiatry there.
As a rule, in these rural areas there are either no health services at all or only non-physician health work-
ers. If endeavours for investing in mental health literacy are undertaken at all, they must be undertaken
with great respect, empathy and wisdom, since the health worker will not stay in the village but the pa-
tient and the healer will.
Conclusions
Health literacy can be improved, with the awareness and involvement of different key stakeholders in the
community, from policy makers to educational services.
Investing in mental health literacy is essential, but – as we have explained here – it is also a complicated
process that requires not only a family doctor with high communication and motivation skills, but also
awareness of the skills that mentally-ill people need to acquire for its supervision and empowerment. It
19- Rubio-Valera M, Fernandez A, Evans-Lacko S, Luciano J V., Thornicroft G, Aznar-Lou I, Serrano-Blanco A: Impact of the
mass-media OBERTAMENT campaign on the levels of stigma among the Catalan population, Spain. 2015.
20- Casañas, R., Arfuch, V., Castellví, P. et al. “EspaiJove.net”- a school-based intervention programme to promote mental
health and eradicate stigma in the adolescent population: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public
Health 18, 939 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5855-1
21- Castellvi, P.; Casañas, R.; Arfuch, V.-M.; Gil Moreno, J.J.; Torres Torres, M.; García-Forero, C.; Ruiz-Castañeda, D.; Alonso,
J.; Lalucat-Jo, L. Development and Validation of the EspaiJove.net Mental Health Literacy (EMHL) Test for Spanish Adoles-
cents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 72.
is not simply a matter of ‘educating’ patients to see their problems the same way that doctors do. It is
necessary to consider the perspectives and the knowledge capacity of patients, as well as the views of
health care providers, and we also need to understand the impact of health systems.
Investing in mental health literacy in non-western cultures needs to be handled with respect for local
belief-systems, particularly in the face of lack of scientific knowledge and weak theories of western
medicine regarding functional disorders.
To take this forward, we recommend adopting a methodological approach from the viewpoint of im-
plementation science. Normalization Process Theory (NPT), which some of us have co-developed and
used extensively, is a valuable framework within which to develop and assess the implementation pro-
cess of initiatives for investing in mental health literacy. The four principal constructs or areas of work of
NPT are: coherence (sense-making work), cognitive participation (engagement work), collective action
(enacting work), and reflexive monitoring (appraisal work)22.
This type of framework will allow researchers, clinicians, policy makers and – most importantly – people
with lived experience of mental distress, to work together to establish how we can invest most effec-
tively in mental health literacy.
22- http://www.normalizationprocess.org/
LUCJA KOLKIEWICZ
Visiting Professor, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal
JEFFREY GELLER
Professor of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA
MICHELLE RIBA
MD, M.S., Professor of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, USA
HELEN HERRMAN
Orygen and Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
IGOR ŠVAB MD
PhD Professor of Primary Care, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Key messages
• By 2030, policy measures need to reverse the trend that predicts increasing disability due to mental
illness
• Although effective treatment and prevention is available, most people do not receive it, partly due to
prejudice and discrimination. A new approach to anti-stigma campaigns and psychological first aid
skills is needed.
• Loneliness and social isolation are becoming increasingly important issues. Investment in connect-
ing people is needed.
Introduction
World Mental Health Day 2020’s goal, ‘Mental Health for All: Greater Investment – Greater Access’, can-
not be achieved unless we address the discrimination and social isolation faced by people with mental
illness. Public attitudes towards mental illness are ill-informed and mainly negative. This includes blam-
ing the person for the illness and expecting that an affected person cannot fulfil responsibilities at home
or work. These negative attitudes, or stigma, may be experienced as beliefs about the attitudes of others
(perceived stigma), or as a person’s own thoughts and beliefs about mental illness (personal stigma).
These beliefs can easily result in discrimination, such as an unwillingness to work with persons with
mental illness, or opposition to someone with mental illness marrying into the family. Stigma can also
result in shame. A person or their family may be unwilling to ask for help, even when gaining access to
treatment and care can make a big difference to the outcome.
According to the 2006 Global Burden of Disease estimates, by 2030, the three leading causes of burden
of disease will be HIV/AIDS; mental illness, particularly unipolar depressive disorder; and ischaemic
heart disease. Unipolar depressive disorder was ranked 4th as a leading cause of disability in 2002 and
will rise to the 2nd most common cause of disability by 2030. Epidemiologists also projected that self-in-
flicted injury will rise as a disease burden from a rank of 17 in 2002 to 14 in 2030. This burden of mental
health disability needs to be addressed and the burden arrested or reversed. We need to urgently invest
in mental illness prevention and mental health promotion.
Most excess mortality in people with mental ill health is attributed to preventable conditions such as
metabolic syndrome including obesity, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and high-risk
behaviours such as tobacco smoking, physical inactivity and risky sexual behaviours. Perhaps if the
people concerned were not experiencing a stigmatising mental health condition, the outcome would be
different
The evidence tells us that people with a mental illness do not benefit from the improved technology,
global wealth and advances in medical science partly because of the labelling of the mental health con-
dition, resulting in prejudice and exclusion. Many people globally, irrespective of country, receive little or
no treatment for their mental disorder, the so called ‘treatment gap’. The treatment gap is approximately
70% in low and middle income countries, and can be as high as 90%. Even in high income countries the
gap ranges from 52% to 74%. Mental health stigma and discrimination make a significant contribution
to this global treatment gap.
Although there are effective treatments for mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, bipolar disor-
der and schizophrenia, many people who have mental illness do not receive evidence based treatment
because of stigma, dissatisfaction with previous services, and a lack of awareness of the benefits of
treatment. Active engagement with citizens and the community to tackle these factors is required. Ser-
vices need to be re-designed with stigma reduction in mind. Mental health workforce training should
actively encourage stigma reduction practices. The population from childhood onwards should have
access to mental health literacy.
Government needs to play a role. Public policies and public health systems need to be organised so they
can effectively tackle mental health issues by ensuring that regulations and policy align with expected
standards of good practice in mental health promotion and mental illness prevention and treatment.
The poor practice and funding across a range of systems designed to address mental health could be
improved by the routine employment of mental health advocates by mental health service providers.
This role is likely to be filled most effectively by recruiting people with lived experience of mental illness.
We therefore need a new approach of embedding anti-stigma campaigns into day to day life and clinical
practice.
First aid for physical health emergencies is available to the many. Defibrillators are available in many
public places and all employers have protocols to follow to deliver physical health first aid. This is not
the case for psychological first aid, even though training is freely available with evidence that shows it
works and can reduce both the effects of mental illness and stigma.
We are calling on governments and policy makers to invest in providing psychological first aid skills to
their population. We are calling on citizens to demand access to psychological first aid as a priority to
decrease the effects of and the stigma associated with mental ill health.
There are many definitions of loneliness. Simply put, it is a subjective negative feeling of being alone.
Social isolation is defined by the number of interactions a person has with others. It may or may not be
accompanied by loneliness.
Nearly one third of older adults experience loneliness and social isolation. This is associated with physi-
cal and mental health problems including high blood pressure, decreased levels of exercise, poor quality
sleep and insomnia, poor vision, feeling low, describing poor quality of life, increased rates of smoking
and alcohol use, poor diet, narrowing of social networks, increased thoughts of suicide, worsening cog-
nitive abilities, and poor compliance with medication. Loneliness is not usually explicitly addressed by
support services, even in those for older adults living in nursing homes.
Asking about loneliness should be part of routine wellbeing assessments. It is relatively simple and
easy to do. There are loneliness scales available and one called ALONE is currently being validated for
professional use and covers areas such as: “Do you think anybody would want to be your friend?”; “Are
you lonely?”; “Are you an outgoing and friendly person?”; “Are you feeling upset or sad?”.
An investment in connecting people will decrease rates of loneliness and improve mental and physical
wellbeing. This can be accomplished by increasing the use of technology including robots and through
social interventions such a providing opportunities for volunteering, befriending, supporting engage-
ment in adult pursuits. Investment in well-being workers and social prescribers can support individuals
to prevent and address loneliness. Providing resources to Community Mental Health Services will en-
hance the services provided to those people with a diagnosed mental illness to maintain community
connectedness.
Investment in mental health should consider the whole system pathway from mental health promotion,
prevention and treatment by addressing mental health stigma and social connectedness at its heart in
order to improve quality of life and outcomes.
Conclusion
Together, we must resolve to end stigma and discrimination related to mental illness. High resourced
countries have much to learn from low resourced countries and vice versa. Prevention is key and togeth-
er, with combined resources, we can break down the walls of social disconnectedness. As noted above,
we must seek to invest in the mental health welfare of all people. World Mental Health Day serves as a
reminder that we are all neighbors and part of a larger community.
To this end, let us resolve that by 2030, we will no longer be talking about stigma in mental health be-
cause these disorders will be not viewed as different than other medical conditions; that people every-
where will be able to receive evidence-based treatment for mental health conditions, without prejudice
or discrimination; and investments now in averting loneliness and protecting at risk individuals will be in
place everywhere. This should be our public health mandate going forth.
By 2030, policy measures need to reverse the trend that predicts increasing disability due to mental
illness
Although effective treatment and prevention is available, most people do not receive it, partly due to prej-
udice and discrimination. A new approach to anti-stigma campaigns and psychological first aid skills is
needed.
Loneliness and social isolation are becoming increasingly important issues. Investment in connecting
people is needed.
REFERENCES
Berg-Weger M., Morley JE. Loneliness and social isolation in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for
gerontological social work. Journal of Nutrition Health and Ageing. 2020; 24: 456-458.
Funk M., Ivbijaro G. (Eds). Integrating Mental Health into Primary Care: A Global Perspective. World Health Organisation
(WHO) and World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca), 2008. ISBN: 978-92-4-156368-0.
Ivbijaro G., Kolkiewicz L., Lionis C., Svab I., Cohen A., Sartorius N. Primary Care Mental Health and Alma-Ata: From Evidence to
Action. Mental Health in Family Medicine. 2008, 5, pp. 67-69.
Luchetti M., Lee HJ., Ashwanden D., Sesker A., Strickhouser JE., Terracciano A., Sutin AR. The trajectory of loneliness in re-
sponse to COVID-19. American Psychologist. 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000690.supp
Liu NH., Daumit GL., Dua T., Aquila R.,Charlson F., Cuijpers P., Druss B., Dudek K., Freeman M., Fujii C., Gaebel W., Hegerl U., Le-
vav I., Munk-Laursen T., Ma H., Maj M., Medina‐Mora ME., Nordentoft M.,Prabhakaran D., Pratt K., Prince M., Rangaswamy T.,
Shiers D., Susser E., Thornicroft G., Wahlbeck K., Wassie AF., Whiteford H., Saxena S. Excess mortality in persons with severe
mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas. World
Psychiatry. 2017, 16(1), pp. 30-40. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20384
Mathers CD., Lonca D. Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Medicine. 2006, 3(11),
e-442. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442
Murthy V. Together. The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World. New York, HarperCollins, 2020.
Sartorius N., Schulze H. Reducing the Stigma of Mental Illness: A Report from Global Programme of the World Psychiatric
Association. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK: 2005, pp.1-12.
Key Messages
• Adopt a social justice approach to child mental health that recognises that mental health outcomes
are associated with social and economic factors
• Investment in mental health must extend beyond psychosocial programs and incorporate indige-
nous concepts where necessary
• A collaborative approach is needed – interventions must extend beyond clinics into schools, com-
munities and the economy.
• Intervene early and adopt a lifespan approach
• Create systems to ensure that policy translates into practice
Introduction
Child mental health remains a much neglected area worldwide despite local and international policies
promoting the need to focus on child mental health. This is moreso in low and middle-income countries
like South Africa where10 – 20% of children and adolescents may experience mental health problems.
1
South African research has demonstrated that social and economic factors – such as poverty, illness
and violence – further influence and exacerbate mental health outcomes.2 South Africa is amongst the
most unequal nations in the world with regards to distribution of wealth and resources. It is also a coun-
try with some of the highest rates of violence in the world. This combined with the high rates of poverty
and unemployment places many children at risk of domestic violence, substance abuse, sexual abuse
and neglect. The prevalence of HIV in the population has lead to millions of children being without par-
ents and at further risk in child-headed households. The country is home to many refugees whose chil-
dren face discrimination and are often denied access to school and healthcare services. Gender-based
violence extends to children as well. While young boys are victims of all forms of violence, there are high
1- Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health world-
wide: Evidence for action. 2011. The Lancet, 378(9801): 1515-1525.
2- Hunt, X., Skeen, S., Honikman, S., Bantjes, J., Mabaso, K.M., Docrat, S. & Tomlinson, M. Maternal, child and adolescent men-
tal health: An ecological life persapective. In Shung-King M, Lake L, Sanders D & Hendricks M (eds). South African Child Gauge
2019. 2019. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.
levels of violence, especially sexual violence including rape, perpetrated against girls and young women.
The economic cost of sexual, physical and emotional violence perpetrated against children in SA, and
neglect of children – including disability- adjusted life-years lost due to death and ill health, reduced
earnings and welfare costs – is estimated as being ZAR196 billion, or 4.9% of SA’s gross domestic prod-
uct.3 The risk for children is cumulative with functioning (or the lack thereof) in one area impacting on
another cascading across the lifespan starting in the antenatal period through to adolescence.2 This is
best evidenced by the results from the National Youth Risk Behaviour Survey where being older, in higher
grades, bullied and binge drinking in the past month, being a gang member and hit by a partner in the
past six months, ever been forced to have sex, ever had sex, having had one or more sexual partners in
the last three months, ever planned to attempt suicide and having made one or more suicide attempts
were significantly associated with feelings of sadness or hopelessness. However a significant number
of learners experienced similar stressors but did not report feelings of sadness or hopelessness possi-
bly due to the positive contextual factors experienced by these learners, that is contextual factors relat-
ed to relationships like family cohesiveness, parental supervision and school connectedness.4
Objectives
It is clear that South African children are vulnerable to developing mental health problems if these are
not addressed for early on in the lifespan. Research and interventions for child mental health are urgent-
ly needed.
3- Richter, L., Mathews, S., Kagura, J., & Nonterah, E. (2018). A longitudinal perspective on violence in the lives of South
African children from the Birth to Twenty Plus cohort study in Johannesburg-Soweto. South African Medical Journal, 108(3),
181-186. doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i3.12661
4- James, S., Reddy, S.P., Ellahebokus, A., Sewpaul, R. & Naidoo, P. The association between adolescent risk behaviours and
feelings of sadness or hopelessness: a cross-sectional survey of South African secondary school learners. 2017. Psychology,
Health & Medicine, 22:7, 778-789, doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1300669
South Africa has a National Child and Adolescent Mental Health Policy Framework that was developed
in 2003 to provide strategic guidance in this area. It focuses on primary care and intersectoral coordi-
nation to build resilience amongst children, adolescents and their families. However this vision has not
translated downwards to broad scale interventions.5 In fairness, the South African government has for a
number of years been providing a Child Support Grant. There are feeding schemes running in thousands
of schools and the government seeks to improve access to education, housing and healthcare in policy
and practice amongst other social justice interventions. However the issues related to mental health
need more attention.
A number of small localized interventions at different stages of the developmental lifespan have/are
currently in place that have produced positive impacts on child mental health. Some case studies are
highlighted here.
The Perinatal Mental Health Project (PMHP) has provided a package of integrated mental health ser-
vices for pregnant and postnatal (perinatal) women in collaboration with the Departments of Health
and Social Development and the NGO sector. The services consist of several components that include
5- Mokitimi, S., Schneider, M. & de Vries, P.J. Child and adolescent mental health policy in South Africa: history, current policy
development and implementation, and policy analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst 12, 36, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-
018-0213-3
universal health promotion and prevention, and capacity development. The PMHP adopts a universal
approach from the first antenatal visit where women are provided with basic education and materials
on maternal mental health and are screened for mental health conditions. Supportive counseling is
provided where needed. Additionally the mental health needs of frontline workers are also addressed, in-
cluding mental health literacy, capacity-building and support for the mental health of staff, themselves.6
A similar approach is adopted by the Ububele Baby Mat project. This project aims to support mothers
by encouraging reflective functioning so that they can focus on their babies, similar to the indigenous
practice of Umdlezane. The practitioners meet with the dyads (psychologist + social worker) informally,
on a mat in the middle of the clinic and discuss their concerns in full view of other mothers who are wait-
ing to have their babies weighed and immunized. The facilitating of wondering, mhlawumbe in isiZulu,
encourages deeper thought about the meaning of the presenting problem. If the Baby Mat practitioners
identify an attachment difficulty or if the client presents with any at-risk behaviour, a referral is made
for Parent-Infant psychotherapy. The Ububele Educational and Psychotherapy centre runs a therapeutic
pre-school for children from the Alexandra township and surrounding areas which provides them with
a holistic and enriching ECD experience, as well as therapy for those who need it. They provide training
courses in psychosocial care and support for those who work directly with children (psychotherapists,
social workers, social auxiliary workers, nurses, pre-school teachers, child care workers and lay counsel-
lors). Most community-based childcare workers interact with up to 20 children each day, and so training
100 childcare workers reaches 2 000 children more effectively daily (see www.ububele.org).
The Sinovuyo kids in South Africa parenting programme provides sessions to parents of 2-9 year olds
over a period of 12 weeks that focusses on building a strong parent–child relationship and equipping
parents with positive discipline strategies. The programme uses the analogy of a “rondavel of support”
for this: helping parents first build strong walls (i.e. a loving and warm relationship) before constructing
a roof (i.e., manage difficult behaviour positively). The programme has been used with the with 296
parents in the Nyanga and Khayelitsha townships (Western Cape, SA) and showed promising results.7
The National Association of Child Care Workers has developed the Safe Park model which is currently
being replicated across South Africa by over 20 organisations. This initiative aims to provide safe spac-
es for children to play where they have access to adult supervision. The model can be implemented
formally via an organization where land may allocated by local authorities and equipment is provided
or informally where resources are scarce. Communities can be proactive about creating these spaces
with volunteers. The Safe Parks model offers healing, support and belonging to all children and works
to countering the stigma countering the stigma that children and families affected by the HIV/AIDS
6- Honikman S, Van Heyningen T, Field S, Baron E & Tomlinson M. Stepped care for maternal mental health: A case study of
the perinatal mental health project in South Africa. 2012. PLoS medicine, 9(5): e1001222;
7- Van Niekerk, A. & Mathews, S. Child violence, injury and safety: A challenge for child health. In Shung-King M, Lake L,
Sanders D & Hendricks M (eds). 2019. South African Child Gauge 201 (pp.21-37). Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of
Cape Town
The South African Depression and Anxiety Support Group (SADAG) was recently recognized for its intro-
duction of speaking books to promote health amongst children. Speaking books are available in English
and indigenous languages (65 languages) and educate children on various topics ranging from health
education and disease prevention through to mental health and social development (65 topics, see
https://speakingbooks.com/our-library/). SADAG also provides regular psycho-educational workshops
and lectures aimed at promoting mental health amongst adolescents in particular. SADAG has been
particularly effective in mitigating suicide amongst adolescents in South Africa (see http://www.sadag.
org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=111&Itemid=136).
The Helping Adolescents Thrive (HAT) project is amongst the most recent interventions which aims
to aims to promote and improve adolescent mental health by providing psychosocial interventions to
enhance adolescents’ cognitive, emotional and social capabilities and skills in low resource settings,
applicable for use in less resourced settings through different delivery platforms. The HAT intervention
is targeted at adolescents (10 – 19-years old). HAT seeks to provide support to governments and other
partners to implement the package thereby helping build capacity and monitoring implementation.2
In the Kwazulu-Natal region the Qhawekazi Empowerment Programme has been effective in reducing
the HIV and TB incidence and unwanted pregnancies in young women aged 19 to 24 years using a Cash
plus Care intervention. In this behaviouoral change initiative a conditional incentive is provided in the
form of cash or vouchers. Part of the condition is to attend health/ empowerment sessions and to take
up HCT and TB screening once every 6 months. The care component is inclusive of the monthly health/
empowerment/ life skills session. Additionally care also includes the support given at the health care
facility (see https://www.cindi.org.za/cindi-projects/qhawekazi.html).
Figure 1 is taken from the 2019 South African Child Guage Report2 and demonstrates the actions nec-
essary in a lifespan approach to improve access to child mental health.
From: Hunt et al., Maternal, child and adolescent mental health: An ecological life persapective. In Shung-
King M, Lake L, Sanders D & Hendricks M (eds). South African Child Gauge 2019.
Further what is clear from the interventions suggested in Figure 1 is that mental health requires an
integrated approach. As mental health is impacted greatly by environmental conditions like poverty,
inequality, violence, etc it is necessary to adopt a social justice approach that recognises that mental
health outcomes are associated with social and economic factors. Interventions must extend beyond
psychosocial programs to all elements of care that includes interventions for structural challenges. A
collaborative approach is needed that extends into schools, communities and the economy. Finally it
is a good start for a country to have a child mental health policy but it is of even greater importance to
create systems to ensure that policy translates into practice. This has been an ongoing message but in
the absence of policy or commitment to policy, the theme of greater investment, greater access is still
possible through NGO’s, community organisations and individuals. The Mental Health Innovation Net-
work - Africa provides an excellent open access platform for the sharing of such initiatives (see https://
www.mhinnovation.net/organisations/mental-health-innovation-network-africa-mhin-africa).
At least 20% of people aged 55 and more may suffer from mental health problems. Biological changes
can interfere with the functioning of the brain. Social change can lead to personal isolation or devalua-
tion. Somatic diseases are also important factors in breaking an already fragile psychic balance. Mental
disorders can exacerbate the symptoms and functional disabilities associated with medical illnesses
and increase the overall cost of care3.
Mental health problems can have a significant impact on an older adult’s ability to carry out the basic
activities of everyday life and to reduce the person’s independence, autonomy and quality of life. The
first step to reduce these negative consequences is simply by making a proper diagnosis. Unfortunately,
mental health problems are not often diagnosed and treated. Many older adults struggle without proper
help, or simply without any help at all4.
1- United Nations. World Population Ageing 2009. UN, New York, 2009.
2- World Health Organization & Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia: a health public priority. WHO, Geneva, 2012.
3- American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Geriatrics and mental health—the facts (http://www.aagponline.org/prof/
facts_mh.asp).
4- United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General. Mental Health. A report of the Surgeon General. NIMH,
Washington, D.C., 1999. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/ResourceMetadata/NNBBHS. Accessed on 26 may 2013.
There are many prejudices about the meaning of mental illness. Many older adults today still see mental
illness as a sign of weakness and are unlikely to admit their difficulties. In addition, symptoms of demen-
tia and depression are too often considered as part of normal aging.
Despite the significant and increasing number of well-prepared professionals, a well-developed body of
knowledge, and a large number of caregivers, it is becoming more and more difficult to persuade the
authorities to invest in the overall older adults’ mental health. This is not consistent with the growing
demographic numbers of this age group in the population. The distribution of skilled mental health
resources for caring older adults among the different regions of the world and income groups is signifi-
cantly uneven and, in many countries, they are even scarce.
In this context, the absence of a comprehensive policies and targeted programs for the older adults’
mental health is not surprising. Despite the improvement in educational programs, the recruitment of
new human resources to work in favor of the older adults’ mental health is becoming increasingly dif-
ficult. Even in Europe, where services are considered to be better developed, between 2011 and 2014,
there was a 3% reduction in the median number of total psychiatrists per 100,000 inhabitants and an
increase of only 1% in the median number of nurses per 100,000 inhabitants: and Europe is still the
WHO region with the most skilled human resources in mental health, and the region of the world with
the highest rate of older adults5.
Other health professions working with older adults are also affected. The lack of psychologists special-
ized in older adults’ mental health severely reduces training opportunities for psychologists and is an
obstacle to the development of positive attitudes towards the choice of a career with the older adults.
The low availability of specialized psychologists also reduces the availability of supervision of non-spe-
cialized psychologists providing support to older adults. However, the lack of adequate resources is not
the only factor limiting the recruitment of adequate health personnel. Negative prejudices among the
general public, decision-makers and health care providers, including doctors, have long contributed to
making professions related to the care of older adults less attractive than other specialties.
While in some parts of the world professionals interested in this area of care argue for designing specif-
ic services to care older adults, in some countries, there is a movement to close specific mental health
services for older adults, considering that this exclusivity reinforces segregation within the health sys-
tem. This specificity was originally recognized as being necessary to treat patients with multiple co-mor-
bidities and special needs, and for which there was a tendency not to consider them as a priority adult
population. Developing services should be closely matched with the resources available, existing heath
systems and prioritization. While developing specialist services at a national level may be appropriate
for some health systems and countries, integration of old age care and old age mental health care into
primary health services may be more appropriate in others.
5- World Health Organization. Mental Health Atlas 2014. WHO, Geneva, 2015.
The high mortality rate of older adults because of COVID-19 pandemic certainly may be explained by the
high frailty level of these persons as well by the presence of multimorbidity conditions in this specific
group. But the present organization of general care – and not only in mental health settings - for older
adults has a high responsibility too, besides the huge personal sacrifice and dedication of the all profes-
sionals caring these persons. The organization of services for older adults suffering from general and
mental disorders needs vast improvement. There has been little attention on the needs of older adults
suffering from anxiety and affective disorders, with suicidal ideation or with psychotic disorders, while
persons with dementia are also in need of particular care. A successful care system for older adults
starts when it can assure access to care for all in need. For this, it will be necessary to improve the per-
ception of the older adults’ value for communities. Activating communities maybe the clue for future
investments in the mental health care for older adults.
A Human Rights framework specifically for older people with mental health problems is still missing.
This is necessary because of the special vulnerability of this population by virtue of societal ageism,
stigmatization, exclusion as well as the disability and dependency which mental illness in old age may
confer. The following values should underpin such framework9:
• Independence: older adults with mental health problems have the right to contribute usefully to soci-
ety and to make their own decision on matters affecting life and death. However, those who are not
able to live independently, have the right to rely on others, for instance on community help.
• Safety: older adults with mental health problems have the right to live safely, with adequate food and
housing, free of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation.
6- Saxena S, Hanna F. Dignity- a fundamental principle of mental health care. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2015:
142(4): 355-358
7- United Nations General Assembly. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations Treaty
Series. 16 December 1966.933:3
8- World Health Organization. Quality rights tool kit to assess and improve quality and human rights in mental health and
social care facilities. Geneva: WHO, 2012
9- World Health Organization. Organization of care in psychiatry of the elderly: a technical consensus statement. WHO/MSA/
MNH/MND/97.3. WHO, Geneva, 1997
• Care and treatment: older adults with mental health problems should benefit from family and com-
munity care and protection and have access to healthcare to maintain or regain their optimum level
of function and well-being and prevent or delay deterioration.
• Confidentiality: older adults with mental health problems have the right to expect that information
about them should be treated confidentially. The degree of any breach of confidentiality must be
proportionate as well as necessary. This is culturally sensitive.
Good health and a life of good quality are recognized as fundamental human rights, in the respect of
the human dignity. Older adults have the right of access to a range of services that can respond to
their health and social needs. These needs should be met appropriately for the cultural setting and in
accordance with scientific knowledge and ethical requirements10. Human dignity can be violated in mul-
tiple ways, such humiliation, instrumentalization or objectification, degradation and dehumanization. All
these kinds of violations can be present during the clinical activity. Stigma and discrimination against
older adults are important factors contributing to reduce the access to care to older adults.
All persons with a mental disorder (or who are being treated as such persons) shall be treated humanely
and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person. It therefore follows that the stigmatisation
of people with mental disorders must be countered wherever it occurs. Since stigma against old age –
independent from that against mental disorder – also occurs in many (although not all) societies, there
is therefore a ‘double jeopardy’ for older people with mental disorders, and both issues need to be ad-
dressed in anti-stigma strategies for this age group. This stigma is unacceptable and everyone has the
right to be protected from it. Counteracting stigma and discrimination is a duty of governments, NGOs,
services, patients’ organizations, families, and communities. To be effective, they will need to work in
partnership. Actions against stigma and discrimination of older people with mental disorders: - should
be a priority of all, to achieve the state of physical, psychological and social well-being as defined by the
Constitution of the WHO; it should form part of the promotion of good mental health by professional
training and public education, and should be a major component of all levels of a health and social care
programme11. These actions will only result if all the community participate to this effort.
10- Katona C, Chiu E, Adelman S, et al. World psychiatric association section of old age psychiatry consensus statement on
ethics and capacity in older people with mental disorders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 1319-1324
11- WHO/WPA. Reducing stigma and discrimination against older people with mental disorders. WHO/MSD/MBD/02.3. WHO,
Geneva, 2002
Social determinants of health are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age and
which are shaped by the distribution of money, power and resources at global, national and community
levels12. These social determinants are associated with mental disorders by contributing to its onset or
course. Social inequalities are associated with increased risk of many common health disorders – in-
cluding mental health disorders – and even of premature death.
Social determinants may play a role as risk factors for mental health problems (unemployment, poverty,
inequalities, stigma and discrimination, poor housing, poor early years’ experience, violence, abuse, drug
and alcohol abuse, poor general health, caring duties), while others may be protective factors (social
protection, resilience, social networks, positive community engagement, positive spiritual life, hope, op-
timism, good general health, good quality family interactions, positive intergenerational relationships).
By acting on social determinants of health, it is possible to contribute to promote the older adults’ digni-
ty and a better subjective mental health and well-being of older people, to build the capacity of commu-
nities to manage adversity, and to reduce the burden and consequences of mental health problems. Dis-
advantages because of mental health problems in old age damage the social cohesion of communities
and societies by decreasing interpersonal trust, social participation and civic engagement13.
Recommendations
1. Governments at all levels should ensure that:
• social well-being principles are included in their mental health policies and programs and that older
adults with mental illness and their families are included in the design and implementation of these
policies and programs;
• there is an equitable and universal distribution of power and resources at global, national and local
levels in order to satisfy the older population mental health needs;
12- de Mendonça Lima CA. Social determinants of health and promotion of mental health in old age. In: Bährer-Kohler S.
Social Determinants and Mental Health. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York, 2011. Pp.: 203-213.
13- Searight HR, Gafford J. Cultural diversity at the end of life: issues and guidelines for family physicians. American Family
Physician. 2005:71(3):515 – 522
• there is parity of funding to support promotion of mental health and the prevention and manage-
ment of mental illness. United Nations, WHO and the World Bank should continue their collaboration
to ensure parity of funding for mental and physical health;
• there is specific policies and programs to reduce both stigma and discrimination against older
adults with mental disorders in collaboration with other groups and individuals;
2. Local, regional, national and international associations and organizations of social and mental health
professionals, service users, families and carers should be able to advocate for the promotion of social
determinants of health and to denounce any attempt of the dignity in the care of older persons with
mental health disorders;
3. The collaboration between primary care, secondary care, social care, mental health services users
and their families, carers & communities, society, governments and NGO’s, is the way to accelerate the
delivery of the best possible mental health coverage and to improve the older population mental health
and social well-being;
4. Institutions involved in education and training of all mental health and social care professionals work-
ing with older persons should include in all graduation and post-graduation curricula:
• different issues of prevention, care, treatment and rehabilitation in older adults mental health;
• the development of skills to manage the global health and social dimension issues in old age;
5. Social isolation is a risk factor for poor mental health, which can affect older adults’ self-esteem.
Health and social care commissioners should ensure that there are policies, programs and facilities in
place to identify and to help older adults at risk of social isolation;
6. Older women often face specific risks which increase their vulnerability both as sufferers of mental
health problems and as care givers. Policies to support them and interventions to prevent mental health
problems and isolation in older women must be strengthened.
SANDRA FORTES
Associate Professor of Medical Psychology and Mental Health, School of Medical Sciences,
University of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
KIM GRISWOLD
Regional vice-chair (North America) WONCA Working Party for Mental Health; Professor, De-
partment of Family Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State Uni-
versity of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo New York.
RYUKI KASSAI
Professor and Chair, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Fukushima Medical Uni-
versity, Fukushima, Japan
ABDULLAH AL-KHATAMI
Regional Vice-chair (Eastern Mediterranean) WONCA Working Party for Mental Health; Director
of Primary Mental Health Program, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
CINDY LAM
Regional vice-chair (Asia-Pacific) WONCA Working Party for Mental Health; Clinical Professor,
Department of Family Medicine & Primary Care, the University of Hong Kong
DONALD LI
President, World Organisation of Family Doctors.
Introduction
Integrating mental health services into primary health care is a fundamental health recommendation.
In the landmark 2008 report Integrating Mental Health into Primary Care, the World Health Organisation
(WHO) and World Organisation of Family Doctors (WONCA) explained why investment in primary mental
health care is so urgently needed. It improves mental health outcomes for patients by enabling better
access to care, increasing detection and effective management of common mental health problems,
and providing seamless care for patients with comorbid physical and mental health problems. It also
has wider social, moral and political benefits, enabling social integration, reducing stigma and protect-
ing human rights1.
We can consider collaborative care as a fundamental reference for an efficient model for improving
mental health care. Based on primary care, and integrating it with specialised professionals, collabo-
rative care facilitates access, support development of interdisciplinary community interventions and
prevent stigmatisation and isolation of people with mental disorders as treatment is offered as part of
general health care.
Despite common beliefs, adequate investment in a primary mental health care is not simply a matter
of providing relevant training to existing frontline workers. Sustained financing is also needed to enable
the creation of a motivated workforce with a variety of relevant skills, ready access to affordable and
reliable medicines and psychological interventions, appropriate information systems and a responsive
service delivery system. This can only be achieved with high level political commitment to manage often
uncomfortable trade-offs and disinvestments in other parts of the health economy.
In this paper, senior members of the WONCA Working Party for Mental Health provide updates on the
current status of investment in primary mental health care in seven high-, middle- and low-income set-
tings. We show how progress has been made in the past decade, but are aware that there is still a great
deal more to be done.
High-income settings
In the United States, investment in primary care ranges from 5-10% of total health care spending: this
includes the entire primary care team, not only family doctors and behavioral health specialists. Major
roadblocks in the US health system - including geographic maldistribution and shortage of psychiatric
professionals – mean that family doctors are the primary source of mental health care, especially for
vulnerable populations and those who need care the most. The COVID pandemic and its devastating
effects on communities further highlights the tremendous need for behavioral/mental health services,
1- World Health Organisation and World Organisation of Family Doctors. Integrating Mental Health into Primary Care: a Global
Perspective. Geneva, 2008.
and the importance of investment in frontline care2. During the past decade, primary care practices have
begun to form constellations of care, enhancing their roles of collaborative, integrative care and ensur-
ing better access and equity for populations suffering from health care disparities3. On-going analysis at
state levels is examining how legislative and regulatory efforts in certain states can achieve reallocation
of resources to primary care.
Primary care consultations for mental health problems in Hong Kong have increased by more than 25%
since the turn of the century4, 5. This increased access follows the Hong Kong government’s investment
in family medicine training posts and enhancement of mental health service in public primary care clin-
ics. Training has engaged, enabled and empowered family doctors to diagnose and manage common
mental health problems. Multi-disciplinary integrated mental health programmes have been established
in primary care clinics throughout the territory. These programmes have enabled patients’ easy access
to psychological counselling by clinical psychologists or occupational therapists, and psychiatrist con-
sultations in collaboration with family doctors in primary care. Funding for primary care research has
also informed family doctors in Hong Kong on how to promote better access to mental health care6.
Saudi Arabia has seen sustained investment in primary mental health care. Almost half of all primary
care centres now include mental health services. An innovative patient interview approach, the 5-Steps
Model, has been validated by expert psychiatrists and family doctors7. To date 1200 family doctors and
847 nurses, working in over 1000 primary health centres, have been trained in this approach. Applied
not only in Saudi Arabia but also in Egypt, Morocco, and Sudan since 2016, this has empowered staff to
provide mental health care in busy clinics.
By contrast, mental health in primary care is rarely mentioned in Japan. Many Japanese suffer from the
stigmatisation of mental illness, which is considered untreatable, and end their lives in an institution8.
Despite having the highest share of people aged 80 and over (8.5% of the population) and the highest
prevalence of dementia (25 per 1000 population)9, the mental health of caregivers is rarely addressed.
Mental health support at work is limited, and the management of mental illness is not standardised.
The suicide rate in this group is high. Additionally, under a fee-for-service system, cost-effectiveness is
seldom considered, with unnecessary investigations and polypharmacy commonplace.
2- Petterson S, Westfall JM, Miller BF. Projected Deaths of Despair from COVID-19. Well Being Trust and Robert Graham Cen-
ter. May 8, 2020.
3- https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/mental-services.html
4- Lee A, Chan K, Wun Y, Ma P, Li L, Siu P. Morbidity Survey in Hong Kong 1994. HK Pract 1995; 17: 246-55.
5- Lo Y, Lam CL, Lam T, Lee A, Lee R, Chiu B, Tang J, Chui B, Chao D, Lam A, Chan K. Hong Kong primary care morbidity survey
2007-2008. HK Pract 2010; 32: 17-26.
6- Chin WY, Chan K, Lam CL, Lam T, Wan E. Help-seeking intentions and subsequent 12-month mental health service use in
Chinese primary care patients with depressive symptoms. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e006730
7- Al-Khatami AD. A guide to Medical Teaching and Learning. Partridge, Singapore, 2018.
8- Ando S, Yamaguchi S, Aoki Y, Thornicroft G. Review of mental-health-related stigma in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
2013; 67(7):471-82.
9- OECD, Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, 218-219 and 224-225. https://doi.org/10.1787/4d-
d50c09-en. 2019
The Japanese government declared mental illness a priority in 2011 and OECD Reviews of Health Care
Quality: Japan (2015) recommended the establishment of primary care to secure high-quality mental
health care10. However, government leadership and effective policy in this area remains lacking. In 2018,
the WONCA Working Party for Mental Health in collaboration with local faculty successfully conducted
a ‘Train the Trainers’ course in primary mental health care, exemplified as an investment in high-quality
training. Furthermore in 2020, on receiving WONCA’s international accreditation, the Japan Primary Care
Association founded a committee prioritising mental health. Although these are small steps, we hope
significant strides will emerge.
Around 35% of the population of Nepal suffer from mental disorders. However, the budget allocated for
mental health is insufficient: only 0.59 staff work in mental health per 100,000 population, of whom only
0.13 are psychiatrists14. At the community level, the provision of psychotherapy is negligible. To provide
mental health services in primary health care, one should know how to diagnose and treat people with
mental disorders; they must have strategies to prevent mental disorders. Primary health care workers
must be able to apply key psychosocial and behavioral science skills, for example, interviewing, coun-
10- OECD, OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality: Japan 2015: Raising Standards, OECD Publishing, Paris, 38-41. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1787/9789264225817-en. 2015
11- Athie K., Menezes ALA, Silva AM, Campos M. Delgado PG ,Fortes S, Dowrick C. Perceptions of Health Managers and Pro-
fessionals about Mental Health and Primary Care Integration in Rio de Janeiro: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Services
Research 2016;16: 532.
12- Macinko J, Harris MJ. Brazil Family Health Strategy: Delivering Community-Based Primary Care in a Universal Health Sys-
tem. N Eng J Med 2015;372;23-2177-2181
13- Means AR., Kemp CG. et al. Evaluating and optimizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research for use
in low and middle income countries : a systematic review. Implementation Science 2020;15:17.
14- Rijal A. Mental Health Situation in Nepal and Priorities for interventions. Health Prospect: journal of public health. 2018
Apr 17(special issue):1-3.
selling and interpersonal skills, in their day to day work in order to improve overall health outcomes in
primary health care. To implement this a lot of careful planning is needed. We must invest in the training
of staff to detect and treat mental disorders, and reduce the overall reluctance of primary health care
workers to work with mental disorders. This is especially needed in countries like Nepal, where psychi-
atrists are not available in remote places. Health care providers working in remote health care centers
need training to develop skills to deliver better mental health care15. Those providers also need motiva-
tion in terms of salary, working conditions, updates in their current knowledge in mental health. Extra
funds are urgently needed in Nepal to develop the existing structures and human resources to deliver
best mental health care.
Mental, neurological and substance use disorders are prevalent in Africa, and most African health sys-
tems agree that optimal mental health outcomes are best achieved through integration of mental health
services into the general framework of existing primary health care16. Provision of mental health services
in primary care necessitates diagnosing and treating persons with common mental disorders, putting in
place strategies to prevent mental disorders, ensuring that primary care workers are trained to apply key
psychosocial and behavioural skills, and ensuring prompt referral of those who need specialized care.
These activities and skills are dependent on a functional primary care system with adequate investment
in workforce, training, pharmacological and psychological interventions and effective information sys-
tems. Unfortunately, these basic ingredients are notably missing in most African health systems17 18.
These deficiencies need to be urgently addressed. Investment directed at correcting these anomalies
in primary health care systems across Africa will ultimately promote access to effective mental health
care.
Conclusions
Regardless of setting, there remains an urgent need for sustained investment in primary care in order
to achieve genuine improvements in mental health care. Active health policy and strong political will are
necessary, but not sufficient. Effective, ongoing training for family doctors and other primary care staff
is essential for the translation of policy to practice. So too is investment in the capacity of primary care
services to enable longer appointments and continuity of care for patients needing ongoing support. We
need effective care pathways between services, and improvements in referral processes, and provision
15- Gupta PP, Jyotsana P, Larrison C, Rodrigues S, Lam C, Dowrick C. Effectiveness of mental health community training
on depression and anxiety to the health care profession working in rural centers of eastern Nepal. J Family Med Prim Care
2020;9:2416-9.
16- Charlson FJ, Diminic S, Lund C, Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA. Mental and Substance Use Disorders in Sub-Saharan Africa:
Predictions of Epidemiological Changes and Mental Health Workforce Requirements for the Next 40 Years. PLoS ONE
2014;9(10): e110208. 8.
17- Bresick G, Christians F, Makwero M, Besigye I, Malope S, Dulliel L. Primary health care performance: a scoping review of
the current state of measurement in Africa. BMJ Global Health 2019;4:e001496.
18- Onokerhoraye AG. Achieving Universal Access to Health Care in Africa: The Role of Primary Health Care. 2016, 20(3):30.
of emotional support for primary care staff themselves. We must enhance the referral process so that
family doctors can easily access further support for people who are feeling suicidal.
Bringing mental health care into the fabric of primary care is essential. “This requires vision, alignment
with a framework, and a method for holding key stakeholders accountable for person-centered out-
comes.”
ANTONIO VENTRIGLIO
University of Foggia, Foggia,
KORAVANGATTU VALSRAJ
South London and Maudsley Foundation NHS Trust, London
Key Points
• Secondary services are needed as an integral part of mental healthcare services for patients with
serious mental illnesses to be assessed and treated especially if they cannot be managed in prima-
ry care.
• Assessments must be culturally appropriate and sensitive so that those needing them can feel com-
fortable using them.
• Inpatient services also need to be safe, geographically and emotionally accessible, culturally ap-
propriate so that patients and their families feel comfortable using them. These require adequate
resources taking into account geopolitical health determinants.
• Globally the leading cause of disability and lost productivity is due to mental ill health, so reducing
the impact by improving access can result in economic gains
Introduction
In healthcare across the world there are generally four levels of care-primary, secondary tertiary and
quaternary. A majority of cases will be dealt with in primary or secondary care. Rarely people will need
to go to tertiary or quaternary; these two are highly specialised centres. Depending upon the healthcare
system available in a particular culture and society, individuals may access secondary care directly by
seeing the specialists without recourse to primary care physicians. Secondary care is thus about spe-
cialist care and also about admission to psychiatry units whether they are based in acute or district gen-
eral hospitals or separate psychiatric institutions. Secondary care is needed for many individuals even
when community mental healthcare is well-running and well provided. In order to ensure that those who
need it get the best and most appropriate care when they need it is vital.
Background
In terms of secondary mental health services for the framework we refer to the Goldberg-Huxley model
1
which can be used in setting up secondary services. Goldberg-Huxley model combines bio- psycho-
social approaches and proposes a pyramidal scheme arguing that a majority of psychiatric cases can
be treated in the community. The original model was proposed 40 years ago and is a widely recognised
pathway to mental health care. The refined model in 1995 suggests that about 20.8 adults per 1000
population per year will be in contact with specialist mental health services2. O’Sullivan et al have high-
lighted that the Goldberg-Huxley model underestimated the utilisation of specialist psychiatric services
in a geographical of Edinburgh3. Of course, there have been significant changes in the last 25 years in
society and perhaps prevalence of psychiatric disorders. Consequently changes in services in the UK
with inadequate funding, closure of old asylums, reduction in inpatient beds, disintegration of generic
community mental health teams, dissolution of health and social care partnerships and the merger of
mental health trusts and community trusts have added to problems.
Psychiatric institutions often get a bad press due to overcrowding, lack of privacy and problems of
confidentiality. There is no doubt that many psychiatric institutions are indeed frightening places which
further contribute to stigma. Pressure on beds and funding of secondary services can be a real problem
in many countries.
Of the people who come into contact with secondary care services, a small proportion will require as-
sessment by specialists and a smaller proportion will require admission to a psychiatric unit. Therefore,
it is quite possible that those who get admitted are likely to have serious mental illnesses such as
schizophrenia, bipolar disorders or illnesses which are chronic and refractory. In the past, asylums or
psychiatric institutions offered asylum in the true sense of the word with giving people space to recover.
Even thirty years ago in the UK, inpatients would have included patients with anxiety and moderate de-
pression. There is no doubt that Institutionalisation did create major problems for the patients but also
1- Goldberg, D. & Huxley, P. (1980) Mental Illness in the Community: The Pathway to Psychiatric Care. London: Tavistock Publi-
cations.
2- Goldberg, D. (1995) Epidemiology of mental disorders in primary care settings. Epidemiologic Reviews, 17, 182–190
3- O’Sullivan, T., Cotton, A. & Scott, A. (2005) Goldberg and Huxley’s model revisited. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 116
the public image of psychiatry and consequently psychiatrists and other mental health professionals
suffered tremendously. In the UK as in many other countries, it led to a shift to community mental health
teams and community mental health centres creating a welcome shift. However, the general assump-
tion by the funders was that community services can be provided cheaply and again the focus shifted to
common mental disorders and many people with serious mental illnesses slipped through the cracks.
In the UK, the next wave was of further specialisation of services such as home treatment teams, cri-
sis intervention teams, early intervention teams, assertive outreach teams, primary care mental health
liaison team, medication support service, community rehabilitation teams etc thereby creating further
barriers for the patients. The patients and their carers and families found it very difficult to traverse these
fragmentations. In the UK, the concept of traditional generic community mental health team was decon-
structed by the creation of diagnosis based path ways, specialist pathways and time limited pathway
teams thereby causing discontinuity of care from a patient and carer perspective. Other nations plan-
ning to travel in that direction, need to remember these lessons. Such fragmentation has contributed to
low morale among both primary care and secondary care staff as the former feel their concerns are not
being taken seriously and the latter feel the pressure of the strain in the system and the barriers to the
basic concepts of quality of health care as outlined by WHO4.
a moral obligation to advocate for our patients and there is a need to renew psychiatry’s contract with
society10.
The future strategies should incorporate the principles set out in the NHS Long Term plan and Five year
forward view for mental health:
The care must be timely, safe, effective, efficient, equitable and person centred11
June 2020
10- Bhugra, D. (2008). Renewing psychiatry’s contract with society. Psychiatric Bulletin, 32(8), 281-283. doi:10.1192/
pb.bp.108.020560
11- Quality of Care – WHO https://www.who.int/management/quality/assurance/QualityCare_B.Def.pdf -last accessed on 16
June 2020
Conclusion
It is important to recognise that there will never be enough resources so in discussion with patients,
public and policymakers professionals need to think out of the box to design, develop and deliver ser-
vices. An agreement is essential to have secondary care services that are fit for purpose based on the
local need.
The mhGAP programme is a WHO programme to enhance community access to mental health8.
The programme began with WHO in 2008 in response to the lack of mental health workers in low and
middle income countries and the clear burden of mental health conditions1.
mhGAP means mental health Gap. This is the gap between what is available for people with mental
health problems and the need. It can be as high as 99% in some countries and there is a gap even in
developed countries2.
There are many different aspects to the programme but the manual is the key tool for non specialised
health workers to use to assess and manage mental health, substance abuse and certain neurological
conditions3. These latter include epilepsy and dementia.
It is for prescribers and non prescribers and everything in mhGAP is evidence based, using research
from all over the world.
Through this, the aim is that in countries with few mental health workers, people can access their mental
health care needs close to their homes in a non stigmatising and economic way.
There is evidence that most mental health problems can be managed at primary care levels4. Cases
that are complex or resistant to treatment can be referred on to specialist psychiatrists who have a very
important role, not only in managing these difficult cases but also in supporting the primary care health
workers through supervision and advice.
I first came across mhGAP in 2010 when I was working to integrate mental health into Primary care after
the earthquake in Haiti. I was supporting primary care doctors in how to assess and manage mental
1- WHO (2010) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): Scaling Up Care for Mental, Neurological and Substance Abuse
Disorders. World Health Organization
2- Hughes P, Thomson S. mhGAP Action Programme 6 Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry pg 4-6, Vol 23 Iss.4 2019
3- World Health Organization. (2016). mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in
non-specialized health settings: mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP), version 2.0. World Health Organization.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250239
4- Keynejad RC, Dua T, Barbui C, et al : WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide: a systematic
review of evidence from low and middle-income countries. Evidence-Based Mental Health 2018;21:30-34.
health in a primary care setting. We had no suitable manual to help these doctors then. Yet everyday we
were seeing cases of depression, epilepsy, stress, psychosis and children’s problems.
mhGAP arrived and filled a gap. We worked on training, supervision and ensuring a medication supply.
Since then I have used mhGAP in many countries, and it is used in over 100 countries. It is also available
as a phone app.
We know that patients prefer their health worker to use a phone app rather than look at a book during
a consultation. It is less stigmatising to be seen in a community setting than the Psychiatric Hospital
and is more efficient and economic5. It is also a natural place for mental physical and social to come
together.
We know that people with mental disorders can die up to 20 years younger than those without6. Being
seen in Primary care means that people can get comprehensive care that covers mental and physical
health. They can be advised about diet, tobacco, alcohol, family planning and family spacing and people
with disabilities may have more ready access to mental health.
mhGAP is human rights based so it brings together protection and mental health, as well as confiden-
tiality. It helps prevent risk of human rights violations. The autonomy of the person is respected. They
can make their own decisions on treatment and choose to not follow the recommendations given by a
health worker if they so wish7. It complies with the Convention on rights of the person with disability8.
The question I often am asked is if this is a western document. No, it is a global document with input
from experts from all parts of the globe. It is not a medical book, or one for psychiatrists, but a manual
for all non specialist health workers.
Psychosocial treatment means to be aware of physical, social, mental and spiritual needs, and to man-
age these. The message is that there is no treatment that does not include an explanation of the pro-
posed plan, and the person who is ill is in the driving seat to make the decision about it.
5- Patel V, Araja R, Chatterjee S, Chisholm D, Cohen A, De Silva M et al: The Lancet. Global Mental health Vol 370, Issue
9591,p991-1005 Sept 15 , 2007
6- Thornicroft, G. (2011). Physical health disparities and mental illness: The scandal of premature mortality. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 199(6), 441-442. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.092718
7- Hughes P, Thomson S. mhGAP Action Programme 6 Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry pg 4-6, Vol 23 Iss.4 2019
8- CRPD-Conventions of the Rights of the Person with Disability https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/conven-
tion-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html June 2020 accessed
To keep the mhGAP programme going, it is essential to have good leadership, ongoing supportive super-
vision and medication supply9. We know these are the ingredients as it tends not to work without these
components
It cannot be overstated that there needs to be local adaptation taking into account local culture. This can
be extensive, or more organic, as people work through mhGAP, and in their supervision. Culture cannot
be overstated, and many countries have an adaptation exercise to meet local needs. There are adapta-
tions for humanitarian settings with the mhGAP HIG10.
Then there is a phase of training, followed by supervision11. Psychiatrists tend to be the key people in
many countries to provide supervision and support for primary care.
The main message of mhGAP is that no one should ever miss out on care for their mental health and if
there is one subject that needs to be covered is depression.
The conditions covered in mhGAP are carefully selected to cover the most common or the most dis-
abling. The conditions reflect Primary care rather than a Secondary care service .
Although Psychosis is relatively rare in a primary care contact, the treatment can be hugely impactful
and psychosis is covered, but the message for Bipolar Affective Disorder is to refer to a Specialist be-
cause the treatment is complex.
mhGAP covers children’s conditions such as hyperactivity, developmental disorders and emotional dis-
orders of children and we commonly find that there is a significant problem of children’s conditions not
getting picked up.
mhGAP covers epilepsy because there is a lack of neurologists and paediatricians to manage this and
provides a great opportunity to talk through the psychosocial aspects of epilepsy.
Substance use is the most varied per region. In Somalia we will focus on Qat/Khat. In Ukraine we talk
about alcohol much more. In the Middle East we talk of the pain medication tramadol abuse. Dementia
is always an important but forgotten topic.
9- Hughes P, Thomson S. mhGAP Action Programme 6 Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry pg 4-6, Vol 23 Iss.4 2019
10- UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide (mhGAP-HIG): Clinical Manage-
ment of Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Conditions in Humanitarian Emergencies, 5 May 2015, available at: https://
www.refworld.org/docid/55c078284.html [accessed 7 June 2020].
11- Ali, S., Saeed, K. & Hughes, P. (2012) Evaluation of a mental health training project in the Republic of the Sudan using the
Mental Health Gap Action Programme curriculum. International Psychiatry, 9, 43–45.
There is a catch all chapter for mild depression, anxiety, psychosomatic problems and stress disorders.
This is so important and a very common issue throughout the world.
Challenges to mhGAP have been due to lack of supervision, lack of medication and lack of buy in. It
needs support of the local psychiatrists to be supervisors and there have been programmes of face to
face and distance supervision12. It is challenging to keep going but very worthwhile. Without supervision
the mhGAP programme withers and manuals are left unused.
The following vignettes provide examples of how mhGAP has directly helped local communities:
“this lady comes in every week with physical symptoms with no clear cause. We used mhGAP and saw
that she had depression. We now will treat the depression as well as her physical symptoms” Uganda
“ I saw this young man for his high blood pressure with his father. After mhGAP I now see him alone and
he is able to tell me about his worries. His blood pressure has improved”
There are many stories of people with psychosis who have been tied up when no treatment is available.
Helping someone with psychosis can help whole family and community, as well as transforming the life
of the person affected.
Conclusion
The mhGAP programme has been hugely influential in how people access mental health in low and mid-
dle income countries and there is evidence that it is effective and well regarded5. However, the engine to
keep it going can falter - that is the supervision, medicine supply and commitment.
Family doctors value using mhGAP, and patients value being listened to and their opinions being taken
seriously about their care.
The mhGAP programme is an opportunity to bring together the physical, mental, social and even spiri-
tual in a non stigmatising, effective and economic manner.
Current training and application of mhGAP now is taking COVID 19 into account. This means there is
more online training and supervision. mhGAP can still carry on and shows its adaptability to circumstan-
ces.
12- Hughes P, Thomson S. mhGAP Action Programme 6 Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry pg 4-6, Vol 23 Iss.4 2019
As shown in Figure 1, Strengthen Community Action, Build Healthy Public Policy, Create Supportive
Environments, Develop Personal Skills, and Reorient Health Services are essential components of good
public mental health policies and strategies.1 On behalf of the Asia Pacific Region, below we briefly in-
troduce the efforts that have been developed in Taiwan:
While “Building Healthy Public Policies”, we found the Asia Pacific Region all have Mental Health Act
which focuses only on mental illness patients, their health services, rehabilitation, etc. However, which
rarely emphasize on mental health promotion for all people. Therefore, a suggestion to have a “Mental
Health Promotion Act” will be a key to turn focuses and resources to enhance “Mental Health for All
People”.2 At the next stage, based on the Mental Health Promotion Act, we can develop more New Mod-
els for Mental Health Promotion including,
• Towards New Era for Mental Health Promotion: Integrating Mental Health into All Policies;
• Develop local empowerment models, to focus on the mental health promotion and primary preven-
tion of the entire public, to build community resilience and social support, and to pay close attention
to the needs of different age groups, economic classes, urban and rural areas, and across different
settings (e.g. workplace, seniors, people living with mental health problem or illness, etc.), is our
priority mission!
Concerning “Develop Personal Skills”, we propose the Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) approach.
• Follow the idea of Canada, mental health promotion (MHP) takes a proactive approach, focusing on
the early and continuous development of positive mental health (Canada,2019). Hence, we choose
the social and emotional education as grass-root tools to promote mental health since they are
childhood. Through the last three decades’ research, it has been found that Social and Emotional
Learning (SEL) can not only contribute to the well-being of students, teachers, and parents but also
consider as an important national capital for a country in the 21st century. The report shows that
every dollar invested in SEL, there will be a substantial economic return of 11 dollars.3 Therefore, we
will advocate and collaborate with the government agencies and SEL-related NPOs to let the stu-
dents’ stakeholders access SEL and then as coaches help the emotional intelligence development
of the students.4 5
Regarding “Reorient Health Services”, we propose both the Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) and Peer Sup-
port Worker (PSW) as the efforts in the mental health field we should work on now.
1- Evans, R. G., & Stoddart, G. L. (2003). Consuming research, producing policy?. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3),
371-379.
2- Chang, Chueh. (2017). Do we need a ”Public Mental Health Promotion Act”: Taiwan Experience, presented at WFMH World
Congress on Mental Health, New Delhi, India, November 2-5, 2017.
3- Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R., & Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional
learning. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6(3), 508-544.
4- K.L. Lay, C.Y. Lin, T.C., Chang, L.J. Yang, H.T. Chen and Y.J. Wang. (2019). Evaluation of a School-Based Social and Emo-
tional Learning Program Using Volunteer Parents as Instructors, presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in
Child Development, 2019, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, March 21-23, 2019.
5- L.J. Yang, S. Tai and H.T. Chen. (2019). An Authentic Social and Emotional Learning Program for Elementary Schools and
Its Implementation in Taiwan, presented at the 2nd Global Summit for Mental Health Advocates, 2019, Taipei, Taiwan, October
5-6, 2019.
• Vocational Rehabilitation (VR)- The Development of Employment Promotion Status for People with
Mental Disabilities in Taiwan.
In Taiwan, people with mental disabilities have been included in the People with Disabilities Rights
Protection Act since 1995, which was originally named Welfare Law for the Handicapped and
Disabled and revised as Physically and Mentally Disabled Citizens Protection Act in 1997, People
with Disabilities Rights Protection Act in 2008. In Chapter 4 “Rights and Interests of Employment” of
People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act”, the law indicates the employment promotion policies
including job training, prevocational training, sheltered employment, supported employment, open
employment, job accommodation, prevocational evaluation, etc. Nevertheless, the environmental
and personal factors such as social stigma, cultural values, the limitation of physical, mental, and
neuro-cognitive conditions and social skills all result in the low employment rate of people with
mental illness. Moreover, the status of low employment of people with mental illness has impacted
the need for long-term hospitalization, high cost of insurance, and family burden. As stated above,
we see more effort should be made to improve the situation of employment of people with mental
illness. In the past 25 years, along with the policy improvement and our works on making recovery
model, combating stigma, and creating resilience. The employment rate of mental disabilities has
been increasing from 4.9 % to 15.4% (1994 – 2018).
• Peer Support Worker (PSW)
Follow the idea of Australia, peer work is an approach to engaging people with mental health issues
as the central actors in the management of their mental wellbeing and in building meaningful and
purposeful lives.6 Receiving social and emotional support, especially from workers with lived experi-
ence, can be an effective promotion and prevention strategy for the journey of recovery. By building
a recovery-oriented relationship, peer support (PS) can help to provide a sense of empowerment,
to foster hope, to improve quality of life, and to reduce hospitalization and symptoms. Actually, PS
is not a new idea to Asia, but the way to legalized peer support worker (PSW) to achieve living with
dignity, equality, and self-reliance is our long-term objective. Consequently, this year, we referred to
the experiences from Australia, Canada, and Hong Kong then have started a pilot PSW scheme in
Taiwan.
In addition, we also advance the Mental Health Literacy Program in Schools, through mental resilience
education and promoting Mental Health Book Week to “Create Supportive Environments”; we promote
the Laughing Qigong Program for Elderly in Communities, through learning emotional transformation
and relaxation to have a healthy lifestyle and active aging, further to “Strengthen Community Action”.
6- Meagher, J., Stratford, A., Jackson, F., Jayakody, E., & Fong., T. (Eds.). (2018). Peer work in Australia: A new future for mental
health. Sydney: RichmondPRA and Mind Australia.
The South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG) was founded in 1994 to support, guide and
advocate for people affected by Mental Health issues. South Africa’s mental health resources are limit-
ed, a problem which is exacerbated for those living outside of the larger urban areas. Not only is mental
health care expensive, people living in outlying or rural areas often require long distance travel to access
it, which is sadly not an option for many.
From the outset, SADAG’s drive was to raise awareness around Mental Health and provide resources and
access to information where they previously didn’t exist. By creating awareness, we can help break the
stigmas that are often associated with Mental Health. One of SADAG’s main objectives is to estab-
lish Support Groups in as many areas as possible, so that everyone, no matter where they live, has ac-
cess to support. To date, SADAG has facilitated the establishment of over 150 Support Groups through-
out the country.
The majority of our Support Groups are run by patients, for patients. SADAG’s model is to harness the
power of lived experiences to break down barriers, debunk myths and to create a safe space for those
who need it most. Support Groups are different to group therapy, and as such, leaders don’t need to have
a medical or mental health qualification. While Support Groups offer valuable resources, they should
not be the first line of treatment or intervention, but rather function as supplementary support. Sup-
port Groups provide an environment of safety, non-judgement, unconditional positive regard and mutual
understanding. Support Groups encourage simultaneous learning, the sharing of personal experienc-
es, and self-help tips. Our Support Group Leaders are passionate and dedicated, offering free resources
to their communities, where often there is little to no mental health help available.
Throughout the years of advocacy, SADAG has not only focused on mental health issues, but also on the
factors within communities that contribute to mental health issues. We have trained Support Group lead-
ers to start substance abuse groups, rape survivor groups, domestic violence support groups, and teen
pregnancy groups to name a few - there are a multitude of different factors and conditions that can leave
people feeling vulnerable and isolated. Collective action builds community members’ awareness that
they are not alone and that their experiences and concerns are shared by others.
For many people Worldwide, COVID-19 has resulted in fear, Anxiety and isolation. At a time when com-
munity, support and togetherness are essential, all of our groups have had to refrain from meeting in their
normal capacity: a face-to-face environment. The international pandemic has reinforced our resilience
and emphasised our need for support and community. SADAG, as the leading Mental Health NGO in
South Africa, has not let the restrictions of COVID-19 prevent it from supporting our communities, but
instead we have worked together and formulated plans to ensure the continuation of support.
One of the several ways we have achieved this is with online training and ongoing support and webinars.
Many of our Support Groups have moved to online platforms to ensure the continuation of support for
their members. We have also engaged in a nationwide five-part training webinar series for those inter-
ested in becoming Support Group Leaders, which was attended by over 200 participants. In what has
been an amazing adaptation to social isolation restrictions, SADAG has created new opportunities for
support by utilising technology to reach a wider audience. Using Zoom and online videos, the team is
currently training over sixty new Support Group leaders from across the country.
In addition, due to the uncertainty of the pandemic and how long restrictions will be in place, SADAG is
now training existing Support Groups on how to run effective online Support Groups via Zoom, WhatsApp,
Google Hangouts and Microsoft Teams. They are also developing guidelines to help future Support
Group Leaders who want to start new groups. The one major advantage with online Support Groups is
that their membership is not restricted geographically, so more people can access help.
Participation in Support Groups has been shown to reduce stress and increase social connected-
ness, factors that are believed to contribute to a strengthened immune system. Support Groups allow
members a space for personal growth, and help to reduce feelings of social isolation, Anxiety, shame,
and bridge the gap between community Mental Health needs and therapeutic treatment.
In a country like South Africa that lacks Mental Health resources, compounded with the additional strain
of the current pandemic, Support Groups are there to provide balance, support and improve treatment
outcomes.
There is a long and valued history of people with a lived experience of mental illness providing informal
support to their peers (consumers, users, survivors). The value of self-help support groups, social and
friendship groups, telephone support trees, and consumers connecting with each other on an informal
basis, whether in hospital or community settings, has existed for well over 50 years.
Peer work is undergoing rapid but sporadic growth and expansion across the world and it is predicted
that the peer workforce will be one of the largest ‘go to’ workforces in mental health, and potentially oth-
er sectors, over the coming decade. Greater investment is needed to recognise the value of peer work,
and the important contribution it makes to holistic mental health care.
Many organisations also offer programs or services which are staffed by peer workers, and which pro-
vide step-up/step-down services, community supports and other alternatives to hospitalisation.
Peer-run services are those that are planned, operated, and managed by people with a personal lived
experience of a mental health issues who have appropriate training.
Most importantly, they help to inspire hope – something desperately needed in these particularly uncer-
tain times when people are feeling especially pessimistic and alone.
But policies relating to peer work need to be about more than just changes in language or jargon. They
need to be more than temporary, unfunded programs or tokenistic representation. We need a fundamen-
tal shift in the way we all think about and work with mental health supports so that equitable access,
genuine empowerment, and respect for everyone’s human rights become embedded.
Peer workers are uniquely placed to help foster the hope and connection that so many people living with
mental health issues struggle to hold on to (even in the absence of ‘social distancing’ due to a global
pandemic). However, it’s essential that those working in this rapidly evolving field are provided with
appropriate training, mentoring and supervision. Otherwise we are just setting them up to fail, and risk
doing harm to those they are trying to support. We need to continue to advocate for appropriate qualifi-
cations and training for peer workers (developed and delivered by those with lived experience), as well
as recognition of peer work as a valuable, discrete profession. This is now more important than it has
ever been.
When you provide hope, you help people to move forward. The
grass is greener, the sky is brighter, and music sounds better. Who
better to provide such hope than someone who has lived expe-
rience of recovery – a knowledgeable and skilled mental health
peer worker!
REFERENCES
• For further information, or references, please refer to this book on Peer Work in Australia, which includes Michael’s chap-
ter on the development of a national qualification for mental health peer work:
• Fong, T., Stratford, A., Meagher, J., & Jackson, F., & Jayakody, E. (Eds.) 2018, Peer Work in Australia : A New Future for
Mental Health, Flourish Australia, Sydney Olympic Park
• Available at your favourite local bookstore or online: https://www.amazon.com/Peer-Work-Australia-Future-Mental/
dp/0648441709
MATÍAS IRARRÁZAVAL
Psychiatrist, MPH, Director of Mental Health Ministry of Health of Chile.
MIGUEL ROJAS
Expert by Experience, National Coordination of Organizations of Users, Family and Friends of
People with Mental Health Conditions in Chile, CORFAUSAM.
RUBEN ALVARADO
Psychiatrist, MPH, PHD of Psychiatry and Community Care, Researcher School of Public Health,
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile.
Health systems need to include community workers to support primary health interventions and there
is an extensive evidence on their effectiveness and viability1. This interest also exists in the community
mental health service delivery model.
The National Mental Health Plan of Chile indicates that people are one of the main community assets
for mental health interventions. Thus, it is necessary to integrate user perspective to generate new ways
of collaborative work that affect quality, relevance, adherence, among other dimensions of mental health
care2. However, the Plan only recommends peer support strategies at the primary care level, referring to
voluntary mutual support and not peer-worker-based interventions.
Chile has one of the most favorable conditions for the inclusion of peer workers in the mental health
workforce in Latin America3. Chile has a successful process of progressive transformation of mental
health services in primary healthcare4. It has also achieved a progressive implementation of the com-
1- Lewin S, Glenton C, Daniels K, Be VW, Jensen J, Johansen M, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health
care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases (Review ). Cochrane Libr. 2010;(3):208.
2- Ministry of Health. National Mental Health Plan 2017-2025. Ministry of Health. Chile; 2017.
3- Stastny P. Introducing peer support work in Latin American mental health services. Cad Saúde Coletiva. 2012;20(4):473–
81.
4- Minoletti A, Soto-Brandt G, Sepúlveda R, Toro O, Irarrázaval M. Mental health response capacity in primary care in Chile: A
contribution to Alma-Ata. Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2018;42:e136. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.136
munity mental health model, which promotes the role of users as experts by experience5. Furthermore,
there are pilot experiences in Chile that have promising results in the implementation of psychosocial
interventions with peer workers, in terms of their acceptability and feasibility6. In the study by Agrest et al
(2019) it was found that community intervention is more complex than traditional services from the user
perspective, due to the stigma and the importance of understanding context. The model of peer-to-peer
work is beneficial to the recovery, social inclusion and community engagement processes. Peer support
should continue to be supported in Chile.
There are also social reasons to incorporate peer workers in mental health services in Chile. The coun-
try has high prevalence of common mental disorder, such as depression and anxiety7. It also presents
an mismatch between the burden of mental illness and availability of public resources, as many Latin
American countries8. Besides, the dissatisfaction expressed by social movements since October 2019
has exposed mental health as part of the problems associated with inequity. Similarly, measures of so-
cial distancing during the coronavirus pandemic are having a major impact on mental health9.
The pandemic has revealed the needs to actively involve communities in mental health care and the lack
of peer workers in mental health services.
The government of Chile has convened a mental health commission to prioritize response actions during
the pandemic10. This commission agreed to prioritize community development and primary healthcare.
There is an important opportunity to strengthen mental health services with the active participation of
users. Chile faces many challenges: it is necessary to adapt the administrative regulations to hire peer
workers. A favorable attitude of professional mental health teams should also be strengthened, along
with providing permanent training to peer workers, to facilitate the implementation of the strategy11.
Chile has the opportunity to prioritize strategies to improve mental health outcomes, including peer
workers participation in the workforce. As peer workers, your employment rights and duties should be
5- Minoletti A, Sepúlveda R, Gómez M, Toro O, Irarrázabal M, Díaz R, Hernández V, Chacón S. Analysis of Governance in the
Implementation of the Chilean Community Mental Health. Pan American Journal of Public Health 2018;42:e131. https://doi.
org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.131.
6- Agrest M, Le PTD, Yang LH, Mascayano F, Alves-Nishioka S, Dev S, Kankan T, Tapia-Muñoz T, Sawyer S, Toso-Salmán J,
Dishy G, Jorquera M, Schilling S, Pratt C, Price L, Valencia E, Conover S, Alvarado R, Susser E. Implementing a communi-
ty-based task-shifting psychosocial intervention for individuals with psychosis in Chile: Perspectives from users. Int J Soc
Psychiatry. 2019;65(1):38–45.
7- Ministry of Health. National Health Survey 2016-2017. Chile.
8- Vigo D V., Kestel D, Pendakur K, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Disease burden and government spending on mental, neurological,
and substance use disorders, and self-harm: cross-sectional, ecological study of health system response in the Americas.
Lancet Public Heal [Internet]. 2019;4(2):e89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30203-2
9- IASC, Reference Group on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support. Interim Briefing Note Addressing Mental Health and
Psychosocial Aspects of COVID-19 Outbreak [Internet]. New York; 2020. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/iasc-ref-
erence-group-mental-health-and-psychosocial-support-emergency-settings/interim-briefing
10- Government of Chile. Gob.cl - Saludable Mente. 2020 https://www.gob.cl/saludablemente/
11- Chisholm J, Petrakis M. Peer Worker Perspectives on Their Potential Role in the Success of Implementing Recovery-Ori-
ented Practice in a Clinical Mental Health Setting. J Evid Based Soc Work [Internet]. 2020;17(3):300–16. https://www.tandfon-
line.com/doi/abs/10.1080/26408066.2020.1729282
considered. A peer workers policy can have an important impact not only on users but also in their con-
text, territory and community. It is a strategy that makes it possible to address some social determinants
that affect people’s mental health.
Clubhouse International
Clubhouse International was founded in 1994 at Fountain House in New York City. Our focus is expand-
ing and sustaining the Clubhouse model for psychosocial rehabilitation, an evidence-based practice
with a 75-year history of offering successful and cost-effective solutions for people living with mental
illness.
Through 310 Clubhouses in 32 countries around the world, Clubhouse International offers people living
with mental illness opportunities for friendship, employment, housing, education, wellness and help ac-
cessing needed medical and psychiatric services in a single caring and safe environment. This socially
inclusive approach reverses the alarming growth trends of higher suicide, hospitalization and incarcera-
tion rates associated with mental illness – and the increasing burden on communities everywhere.
Our Mission
Ending social and economic isolation for people with mental illness by growing the number and quality
of Clubhouse rehabilitation programs worldwide.
What is a Clubhouse?
Clubhouses are a local solution to a global problem. One in four adults will experience mental illness in
their lifetime. One in 25 will experience a serious mental illness – bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major
depression. Four of the top ten leading causes of disability are neuropsychiatric disorders, representing
23% of all years lost to disabilty – more than cancer and HIV combined.
A Clubhouse is unique because it focuses on individual abilities and talents, rather than on their mental
illness. Friendships, work and education are the heart and soul of Clubhouse communities, where peo-
ple with mental illness reclaim their futures and build fulfilling and hopeful lives. Expanding, strengthen-
ing, advocating for this approach – the Clubhouse Model – is what we do at Clubhouse International.
Every year:
• Clubhouse International coordinates the International Standards for Clubhouse ProgramsTM (Stan-
dards), a set of 37 comprehensive Standards developed and evaluated biannually through a robust,
community- and consensus-based process.
• Clubhouse International is the Accrediting body for Clubhouses worldwide. Clubhouse International
Accreditation™ is a clear demonstration of a Clubhouse’s commitment to excellence. Today, 80%
of our Clubhouses are Accredited, compared to just 46% in 2014. These Clubhouses are universal-
ly recognized as operating with a high level of compliance with the Standards. The Accreditation
process is both evaluative and consultative. It is conducted by members of the Clubhouse Interna-
tional Faculty, which is composed of members and staff from Accredited Clubhouses around the
world. Together, we oversee a rigorous process that includes a self-study, a multi-day site visit by a
two-person trained faculty team, a written findings report and ongoing consultation.
• Training is critical to our ongoing success. Clubhouse International offers an array of intensive
training experiences. We trained more than 150 Clubhouse groups at our 12 global training bases
in 2019. We host regular webinars, regional and national conferences and a biennial World Seminar,
New Clubhouse Development trainings, and provide individual support and mentoring to Clubhous-
es, start-up groups and burgeoning Clubhouse leaders. In all, we provided 43,536 in hours of training
last year.
Expansion – We work directly with start-up groups around the world to start sustainable new Clubhous-
es. We’re currently working with 50 groups in 18 countries. It’s a process that includes formal training
as well as ongoing assistance and mentoring to help local groups establish volunteer boards and raise
the funding needed.
Education & Raising Awareness – We are working at every level, from local municipalities to state and
federal governments, to establish support for new and existing Clubhouses and to help expand all fund-
ing and services for people with mental illness. We raise awareness via conferences, webinars, our
monthly newsletter, social media and partnerships with other advocacy organizations. about the preva-
lence of mental illness and educate constituents worldwide on how Clubhouses are an important part
of the solution.
In 2014, Clubhouse International was the co-recipient of the Conrad N. Hilton Humanitarian Prize, pre-
sented to nonprofits judged to have made extraordinary contributions toward alleviating human suffer-
ing.
• Better employment results: Longer on-the-job tenure is found to be highly correlated with Clubhouse
attendance. Studies have shown that the Clubhouse model results in longer job tenure (median of
199 vs. 98 days) and higher earnings (median of $3,456 vs. $1,252) than other mental health pro-
grams.2
• Reduced hospital stays: Clubhouse membership has been shown to cut the number of hospitaliza-
tions by one-third and the average number of hospital days per year by 70%.3
• Reduced incarcerations during and after Clubhouse membership, thus cutting incarceration costs
between $20,000-$65,000 per inmate per year.4
• Better physical and mental health: A recent study suggests that service systems like Clubhouses
that offer ongoing social supports enhance mental and physical health by reducing disconnected-
ness.5
• Cost-effectiveness: The annual cost of Clubhouses ($3,684) is estimated to be one-third of the
annual cost of the Individual Place and Support (IPS) model with Vocational Rehab ($13,376); about
one-half the annual costs of Community Mental Health Centers ($6,818-$8,661); and substantially
less than the annual cost of the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model ($11,668). 6
The Clubhouse concept is still a radically different way of working in the field of community mental
health. Most models still focus on assessing a person’s level of disability and limiting the expectations
based on that assessment. Most use teaching or treatment as the vehicle for providing rehabilitation.
Clubhouse programs improve quality of life and opportunities for recovery, by promoting healthy life-
1- Patel, Saxena, et al. (2018). The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development, The Lancet, Vol.
392 Issue 10157, https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(18)31612-X.pdf
2- Macias, C., Rodican, C. F., Hargreaves, W. A., Jones, D. R., Barreira, P. J., & Wang, Q. (2006), Supported employment out-
comes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and Clubhouse models, Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1406-1415; and Schone-
baum, A. D., Boyd, J. K., & Dudek, K. J. (2006), A comparison of competitive employment outcomes for the Clubhouse and
PACT models, Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1416-1420
3- Di Masso, J., Avi-Itzhak, T., Obler, D.R. (2001), The clubhouse model: An outcome study on attendance, work attainment and
status, and hospitalization recidivism, work, 17(1):23-30.
4- Johnson, J. and Hickey, S. (1999), Arrests and incarcerations after psychosocial program involvement: Clubhouse vs. Jail-
house, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23, 66-69.
5- Leff, H.S., McPartland, J.C., Banks, S. et al. Mental Health Services Research (2004) 6: 93.
6- McKay, Colleen & Yates, Brian & Johnsen, Matthew. (2007). Costs of Clubhouses: An International Perspective. Administra-
tion and policy in mental health. 34. 62-72.
styles, supporting individual empowerment, education and employment success. Clubhouses are also
critical in helping members participate fully in their communities.
Our Vision
We envision a world where people living with mental illness recover and are an integral part of society.
The success of our model helping people go from isolation to living fulfilling lives is powerful proof that
change can occur.
Clubhouse International, our network of 310 Clubhouses in 32 countries and the thousands of people
whose lives are transformed by Clubhouse all support the call to action for World Mental Health Day
2020. This is indeed the time for greater investment in mental health services across the spectrum, in-
cluding Clubhouse. The time to act is now.
EDWIN NDLOVU
Director of Operations ELFT
JESSICA PRAKASH
Manager Tower Hamlets Recovery College ELFT
DENNIS SHORUNKEH-SAWYER
Project Manager Tower Hamlets Recovery College ELFT
IMTAZ KHALIQ
Peer Tutor Lead Tower Hamlets Recovery College ELFT
JOSEPH THOMPSON
ILP Lead / Peer Tutor Tower Hamlets Recovery College ELFT
ASHA ABDILLAHI
ILP Mentor/ Peer Tutor Tower Hamlets Recovery College ELFT
TAHARA MATIN
Administrator Tower Hamlets Recovery College ELFT
Introduction
World Mental Health Day 2020, Mental Health for All: Greater Investment- Greater Access cannot be
achieved without including people with lived experience of mental health and mental health service
users.
If this is go to beyond just rhetoric, people with lived experience and their families need to be at the cen-
tre, and this requires investment so that they can take a more active role in their own self-care and the
care of their loved ones. Investment in Recovery Colleges is a good example of this type of investment,
because approximately 80% of care in long term conditions including mental health is self-care.1
The consumer/survivor movement began developing in the 1980’s, and the 1990’s marked the “coming
of age” of the peer movement.2 3 A further empowering of people with lived experience of mental illness
occurred in the USA4 in the 1990’s with the first Recovery College and led to the establishment of the first
UK Recovery College in 2009.5 6
The key to success is to respect the value of lived mental health experience equally to the value of
professional training, therefore all activities are co-planned, co-designed, co-delivered, co-received and
co-evaluated.
In this way everybody’s expertise is brought together so that everybody can become an expert in their
own self-care. Students who are service users, members of the general public and health staff learn
from one another, promoting mental health literacy across the system.
It is important for those people who pay for and commission service to recognise the importance of this
intervention in the pathway of care. Though Recovery Colleges have been in existence since 1990 by
2018 they were either planned or in existence in 22 countries.10
The overall aim of the Recovery College is to develop an innovative way to empower individuals living in
Tower Hamlets with mental and physical health conditions, their families, carers and people who work
with them to take a new approach to health promotion and dealing with long-term physical and mental
health issues by embedding self-care and wellbeing into their day to day lives.
9- Perkins R, Repper J, Rinaldi M, Brown H. Briefing Recovery Colleges. London, UK: Centre for Mental Health. 2012
10- Crowther A, Taylor A, Toney R, Meddings S, Whale T, Jennings H, Pollock K, Bates P, Henderson C, Waring J, Slade M. The
impact of Recovery Colleges on mental health staff, services and society. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2018; 1-8.
The vision is to make self-care the cornerstone of all health encounters, and this vision was reinforced
in the pilot because we worked with service-users, carers, staff from local partners in health, wellbeing
and education in Tower Hamlets to co-produce and co-deliver our vision for recovery, initially through
workshops, a multiagency Steering Group and a Curriculum and Quality Group which developed Copro-
duction Guidelines.
Our vision was reflected in the imagery chosen for the branding of the pilot project, looking through a
keyhole to a life beyond ill health with the Recovery College unlocking the future. This was co-produced
over three workshops facilitated by the ELFT Associate Director of Communications and Engagement
working with potential college students, staff, partners and the ELFT Forensic Directorate Nu-Leaf de-
sign service user social enterprise
The pilot was successful, delivered from a range of community facilities with a broad range of commu-
nity partners and was able to meet the diversity of our population.
At the end of a successful pilot ELFT entered a competitive tender process and won an initial three-year
contact, and subsequently another five year contract, to deliver a minimum of 20 courses per term, three
terms per year from a range of community venues until 2024. Having recurrent short contracts make it
difficult for good planning, and this is something that needs to be considered if we are to mainstream
such services as part of investment to improve access to mental health.
Alongside a range of courses, students can also access Individual Learning Plans (ILP). The ILP is a
framework that enables a student to make the most of their learning experience. In a one-to-one meet-
ing, an ILP Mentor supports the individual to find the courses that are best fit for their recovery journey,
as well as establish achievable self-identified goals and possibly explore classroom adjustment to en-
sure their learning needs are met.
For students who also identify as a ‘service user’, there is an integrated pathway from being a student to
joining the College as a paid Peer Tutor or Tutor Expert by Experience. The pathway involves attending
the in-house Train the Trainer course which can be used anywhere, and then volunteering as a Peer Tutor
for twenty hours after which, if they choose, they can progress to paid employment as a Sessional Peer
Tutor. This pathway is intended to support students to move from identifying as a ‘service user’ (done
to) to a staff member (doing with) and to ensure lived expertise is monetarily equal to professional ex-
pertise.
We currently have fifteen Peer Tutors, five who are paid and ten who are volunteers progressing to paid
later in 2020. In addition to our volunteer Peer Tutor roles, we have a classroom assistant and two librar-
ian volunteer roles currently held by people who also identify as ‘service users’. All Peer Tutors are led by
the Peer Tutor Lead who represents the lived experience voice at a senior level and provides supervision
and bespoke Advanced Tutor Training to support continuing professional development and progression
beyond the Peer Tutor role.
Image 3: THRC Spring Term 2019 - student ethnicity, age and religious belief
Ethnicity
Age
Religious belief
We are able to support the diversity of the population in our area promoting social inclusion, spirituality
and breaking ethnic barriers as shown in the image above. Our courses are interesting and of a high
standard, because we receive excellent feedback from our students about the course quality and use-
fulness.
In Spring 2019, 92% of students rated courses as very or extremely interesting and informative 92% of
students rated the learning to be very or extremely useful to them and 91% of students enjoyed the ses-
sions very much or extremely.
Some of our students and peer tutors have progressed onto local courses, employment, further educa-
tion, volunteering opportunities and engaged with local services that they were introduced to by engag-
ing in Recovery College courses.
Conclusion
We have used the Recovery College as a tool to promote social inclusion, mental health literacy, reduc-
ing stigma associated with mental ill health and a platform for our students to engage with volunteering,
further education and pathways to employment.
If we are to continue to promote the philosophy of holistic care, where every encounter matters then
innovative approaches such as the Recovery College should be supported and encouraged especially as
it is evidence based with good outcomes.
It is surprising that an approach developed in 1990 has only been adopted in 22 countries so far and
has not yet an established in the pathway of mental health care. Self-care and well-being matter, and
this needs to be routinely included in commissioning mental health services. Investment in this type of
innovation should be available in all countries.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Rob Pickard, Carrie Kilpatrick, Paul James, Tracey Upex, Nina Ezra, Tony Fulham,
Angela Byrne, Fiona Ball, Su Goulding, Imam Qamruzzaman, Raphael Zernoff, Juan Adriano, Sophie
Akehurst, Siobhan Finnegan, Marion Reilly, Lisa Dutheil, Jane Evans, Ismael-Rachid Abdi-Ibrahim, Marla
Ellis, Nana Asare-Amponsem, Olcay Morreale, Mikloth Bond, Yasmin Mahmood, Salvador Goncalves,
Ingrid Leggatt, Dino Patel, Halima Baiyat, Foyjul Islam, Lisa Duthiel, Marion Reilly and all the students,
volunteer peer tutors, volunteer professional tutors and members of the local community who have sup-
ported the delivery of this service since the pilot, including the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and
Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group for having the foresight to commission this innovative
and inclusive service.
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR RUTH VINE, MBBS, DIP PSYCH MED, FRANZCP, GRAD DIP
CRIM, LLB
Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Mental Health, Health Systems Policy and Primary Care Group,
Australian Government Department of Health.
MR MARK RODDAM
First Assistant Secretary – Mental Health Division, Health Systems Policy and Primary Care
Group, Australian Government Department of Health.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic ignited what has been called a “fast, unpredictable tempest” when it comes
to the mental health impact on the community.(1:e29) The first cases of COVID-19 were confirmed in
Australia in late January, 2020 and similar to many countries, the Australian government acted quickly
to implement measures to prevent disease transmission, which included restrictions to travel and social
gatherings.
On March 29, 2020 when the highest nationwide restrictions were imposed, the Government also an-
nounced a $74 million funding package to boost mental health services.2 This enabled swift devel-
opment and implementation of the National Mental Health and Wellbeing Pandemic Response Plan.3
Aligned with the World Health Organisation’s policy statement emphasizing a planned response to men-
tal health needs, the Plan aimed to strengthen outreach capability, improve connectivity and guide men-
tal health interventions over the ensuing months and years.
Social restrictions started to ease from May 2020,4 and were effective in limiting the physical health im-
pact of the pandemic. However, for many, including those with existing mental health challenges,5 6the
social isolation negatively impacted both their physical and mental health and wellbeing.7 8 For others,
such as the elderly,9 migrants and refugees,10 it compounded isolation and loneliness.11 Vulnerabilities
were more evident for those who were required to quarantine.12
1- Pereira-Sanchez V, Adiukwu F, El Hayek S, Bytyçi DG, Gonzalez-Diaz JM, Kundadak GK, et al. COVID-19 effect on mental
health: patients and workforce. The lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(6): e29-e30.
2- Prime Minister of Australia [press release]. Update on coronavirus measures. March 29, 2020.
3- Australian Government Department of Health. National Mental Health and Wellbeing Pandemic Response Plan Canberra
Australia: Australian Government; 2020 [Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/news/national-mental-health-and-wellbe-
ing-pandemic-response-plan.
4- Prime Minister of Australia [press release]. Update on coronavirus measures. March 29, 2020.
5- Lima CKT, Carvalho PMM, Lima I, Nunes J, Saraiva JS, de Souza RI, et al. The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV
(new Coronavirus disease). Psychiatry research. 2020; 287:112915.
6- National COVID-19 Health and Research Advisory Committee. Mental health impacts of quarantine and self-isolation. Na-
tional Health and Medical Research Council; 2020 May 19, 2020.
7- National COVID-19 Health and Research Advisory Committee. Mental health impacts of quarantine and self-isolation. Na-
tional Health and Medical Research Council; 2020 May 19, 2020.
8- National Academies of Sciences EaM. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care sys-
tem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020.
9- National Academies of Sciences EaM. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care sys-
tem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020.
10- National COVID-19 Health and Research Advisory Committee. Mental health impacts of quarantine and self-isolation.
National Health and Medical Research Council; 2020 May 19, 2020.
11- Neal M. Good Friday was Lifeline’s busiest day ever as cornavirus puts strain on mental health. ABC News (Aus). 2020;
Apr 18, updated Apr 19, 2020: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-19/good-friday-was-lifeline-busiest-day-ever-coronavi-
rus-anxiety/12161104.
12- National COVID-19 Health and Research Advisory Committee. Mental health impacts of quarantine and self-isolation.
National Health and Medical Research Council; 2020 May 19, 2020.
In rural Australia, COVID-19 followed a period of severe drought and bush fires, and many already faced
uncertain futures.13 At the height of nationwide social isolation measures in Australia, there was a 75%
increase in online searches related to domestic violence.14 Mental health services in Australia reported a
40-60% increase in demand for March and April 2020, reporting a higher prevalence of loneliness, finan-
cial concerns related to job losses, health anxiety, and stress related to home isolation, including school
closures and caring for children while working from home.15
Early development and implementation of mental health policies and programs was important to reduce
the potential impact of COVID-19 in the community.16 Existing systems within Australia, such as strong
primary care and well-developed community organisations, provided an excellent foundation for public
mental health promotion and primary care service delivery.
High quality information and resources aimed to reassure the community that it was normal to experi-
ence anxiety during a challenging situation such as a pandemic.17 In fact, evidence from previous com-
munity crises shows that many people show great resilience during disasters and find new strengths,
and supporting them to do so only increases this possibility.18 Therefore mobilizing existing community
resilience was at the forefront of the Australian Government’s response to COVID-19.
For people who required additional support for their mental health and wellbeing, there was early recog-
nition of the critical need for trained healthcare providers, accurate assessment, and resources.19 Over-
coming stigma about mental health remains a worldwide problem and Australia has invested heavily in
national campaigns to reduce this stigma,20 21 providing a setting for high community acceptance of the
Government’s COVID-19 mental health and wellbeing campaign.
13- Rural Australian surged to seek supports to combat stress [press release]. https://www.rdaa.com.au/documents/
item/1068: RDAA & ACRRM, 8 May 2020 2020.
14- Prime Minister of Australia [press release]. Update on coronavirus measures. March 29, 2020.
15- Stephens J. Right now, Lifeline Australia is receiving a call every 30 seconds. Here’s what they’re hearing. Mamamia.
2020; May 12, 2020: https://www.msn.com/en-au/lifestyle/familyandrelationships/right-now-lifeline-australia-is-receiving-a-
call-every-30-seconds-heres-what-theyre-hearing/ar-BB13TR3Q?li=AAgfLCP&ocid=wispr.
16- Pereira-Sanchez V, Adiukwu F, El Hayek S, Bytyçi DG, Gonzalez-Diaz JM, Kundadak GK, et al. COVID-19 effect on mental
health: patients and workforce. The lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(6): e29-e30.
17- Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020.
18- Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020.
19- World Health Organisation. Depression Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/
news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression.
20- Beyondblue. beyondblue Information Paper: Stigma and discrimination associated with depression and anxiety. Australia:
Beyondblue; 2015.
21- Suicide Prevention Australia. Position Statement: Social Inclusion and Suicide Prevention. Leichardt, NSW, Australia:
Communication
Understanding the facts about COVID-19 was the first step to help mobilise the community to act and
behave in ways that were protective of themselves and others. Recognising the value of strong, consis-
tent communication from a trusted source,23 a targeted community-wide mental health communication
campaign, with evidence based tips on how to cope by mental health experts, was broadcast through
social media, television and radio. Weekly webinars by key government and health officials enabled two-
way communication between the COVID-19 policy response team and the nation’s healthcare providers.
Having to stay at home and physically isolate from friends and, for some, family, constituted a radical
societal change. The most important tip was to reframe the phrase ‘social distancing’ to ‘physical dis-
tancing with social connection’ to emphasise the importance of staying connected to other people. Tips
to manage mental health during the isolation included maintaining a sense of control through setting up
a daily routine, staying active, eating well, and staying socially connected with friends and family. Advice
to manage the avalanche of information and misinformation about COVID-19 on social media platforms
encouraged people to stay informed through using credible sources of information and to have time
away from COVID-related news. Importantly, leaders in the community maintained a sense of hope and
reminded the population about the temporary nature of the pandemic.24
The Head to Health website provided a starting point, with information available to help people access
different types of mental health support, and tips were provided to help assist in choosing a service.25
Links were provided to a variety of Australian mental health services including Kids Helpline, Lifeline, Head-
space, Mindspot, Phoenix Australia, and Beyond Blue. Dedicated government and private funding supported
the development of a specific COVID-19 information hub, the provision of Coronavirus digital resources,
and a 24 hour phone counselling service through Beyond Blue.26 This was designed to help people experi-
encing COVID-related anxiety or stress, including changes to employment, school and health, and family
concerns.
Telehealth services
New temporary telehealth services, delivered by telephone or video-consultations, were introduced and
funded through Australia’s national public health insurance scheme, Medicare.27 These aimed to ensure
continued access to regular health care such as chronic disease management, and COVID-19 care, as
well as access to mental health care and support, while at the same time reducing the risk of transmis-
sion of COVID-19 in health care settings. Mental health telehealth services aimed to support both contin-
ued engagement for people with existing mental health problems, and initial contact with mental health
services for those experiencing mental health challenges for the first time. This strategy acknowledged
the importance of being able to connect with other people and the critical role of the therapeutic rela-
tionship. At the same time, people who needed face-to-face contact were provided ways to access this.
Existing telephone, online, and digital work and study support services for children and young people were
expanded, and additional staff were trained as counsellors to meet increased demand for services -
these included Kids Helpline, Lifeline, and Headspace. The role of parents in talking to children and helping
them to understand and cope with the pandemic was crucial. Head to Health provided tips for parents for
making time to talk with children and find out what they already knew, explaining COVID-19 in a way that
children could understand, and ways of tuning into children’s feelings.
25- Australian Government Department of Health. Head to Health: COVID-19 Support Canberra, Australia: Australian Govern-
ment; 2020 [Available from: https://headtohealth.gov.au/covid-19-support/covid-19.
26- Beyondblue. Coronavirus Mental Wellbeing Support Service Australia: Beyondblue; 2020 [Available from: https://coronavi-
rus.beyondblue.org.au/.
27- Australian Government Department of Health. The Australian Health System Canberra, Australia: Australian Government;
2020 [Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/about-us/the-australian-health-system#medicare-the-foundation-of-our-
health-system.
The pandemic represented a particularly challenging time for older Australians who were both at great-
er risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19 infection, and often in institutional or isolated home settings.
Funding was put in place to expand a community visitor scheme, where staff and volunteers helped the
elderly to stay connected by telephone or online. In addition to increasing access via telehealth, existing
psychosocial support services for community mental health clients were extended. Peer-support ser-
vices for people with urgent, severe and complex mental illnesses were also bolstered with additional
government funding. Due to pre-existing health issues, high population mobility and difficulties with ser-
vice access, Australia’s Indigenous Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were at increased risk
of COVID-19. Specific resources were developed by Indigenous people for Indigenous people.28
Frontline health workers reported high levels of anxiety and depression during the pandemic,29 30 with in-
creasing severity reported for those engaged in direct care of patients with COVID-19.31 Rural clinicians
are often community leaders and highlighted the need for support to maintain their own mental health
and wellbeing during the pandemic.32 Early support is a key mechanism to prevent or minimise the im-
pact of stress on mental health.33 For healthcare workers this included the provision of consistent and
clear guidelines to support them in their clinical roles34 and a dedicated portal available on the Head to
Health website, and included links to Mindspot, providing psychological tips for frontline staff, and TEN-
The Essential Network for health professionals, developed by the Black Dog Institute.
28- Australian Government Department of Health. Coronavirus (COVID-19) resources for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
people and remote communities Canberra Australia: Australian Government; 2020 [Available from: https://www.health.gov.
au/resources/collections/coronavirus-covid-19-resources-for-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-people-and-remote-commu-
nities.
29- Naren T. ‘Needless to say, I don’t sleep well’: A GPs life at the coronavirus coalface. AusDoc Plus 2020; April 30, 2020:
https://www.ausdoc.com.au/news/needless-say-i-dont-sleep-well-gps-life-coronavirus-coalface.
30- Jenkins K. ‘GPs need to be kind to themselves’: Your mental health in a time of COVID-19. AusDoc Plus. 2020; May 14,
2020: https://www.ausdoc.com.au/news/gps-need-be-kind-themselves-your-mental-health-time-covid19.
31- Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Work-
ers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA network open. 2020;3(3) :e203976.
32- Rural Australian surged to seek supports to combat stress [press release]. https://www.rdaa.com.au/documents/
item/1068: RDAA & ACRRM, 8 May 2020 2020.
33- Greenberg N, Docherty M, Gnanapragasam S, Wessely S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers
during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2020;368:m1211.
34- Desborough J, Hall Dykgraaf S, Rankin D, Kidd M. Importance of consistent advice during a pandemic. Australian Journal
for General Practitioners. 2020; 49:369-72.
Acknowledging the value of research in understanding the mental health impact of emergencies, sub-
stantial funding was provided for rapid research to improve the national mental health response to
COVID-19.35 Specific funding was dedicated to research focusing on the impact of COVID-19 on men,
including new fathers, men in construction, and those who had lost their jobs.
35- Additional $20 million for Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Research [press release]. May 25, 2020 2020.
Organized medicine and health care systems have consistently described their desire to achieve health
equity. The coronavirus pandemic and its impact on Black/Ethnic (BME) communities shine a light
on the pervasiveness of what has thus far been an unattained goal—accessible, high-quality, and ev-
idence-based care for all groups regardless of race, class, gender, or sexual identity. Amidst this pan-
demic psychiatrists and mental health professionals are challenged to take a closer look at their role
in meeting the needs of communities that have been made vulnerable by systemic and social factors.
The disproportionate number of BME Americans who have died from COVID-19 is a call to action for all
institutions and individuals that provide treatment, services, and care.
The word “inequity” is a useful descriptor in measuring outcomes. However it fails to fully define the
core reasons for health disparities. The substance of inequity is racism. Medical and institutional racism
have driven disparate outcomes for BME Americans since the Colonial period.
The National Academy of Medicine published a landmark report in 2002, “Unequal Treatment: Confront-
ing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care,” that examined racism in health care. It outlined the
societal impact of racism and its effect on health care outcomes for Blacks and discussed professional
biases. It discussed the inequities in service delivery. For example, Black patients were often undertreat-
ed for their depressive symptoms. Black people are more likely to be over diagnosed with schizophrenia
spectrum disorders. More likely to be prescribed antipsychotic medications usually with higher doses
than their white counterparts despite similar symptoms.
Based on these treatment differences, health care systems and mental health professionals misinter-
pret or ignore the experiences of Black patients. Expressions of Black distress are often policed. Blacks
are disproportionately represented in the justice system especially those with severe mental illness. Are
more likely to receive harsher sentences than their white counterparts. Experts agree that the mental
health services provided in jails and prisons are inadequate.
Detroit, Michigan has large Black population offers an example of the racial and economic factors that
contribute to community spread of the disease. Detroit has received little economic support from the
federal and state government and in the wake of COVID-19. Historically, many communities are in med-
ically underserved areas. Detroit is the major contributor to the state’s disproportionate death rate of
Blacks (33%-40%) from COVID-19 even though this group comprises only 14% of state residents. In
Chicago, 70% of COVID-19 deaths occurred in Black communities. Other cities such as New York City,
Albany, and New Orleans show comparable findings.
American racism and adversity play a role in the higher psychiatric disease burden and trauma for
Blacks. They face traumatic events common to modern society, but also experience the impact of rac-
ism. Moreover, it starts early in their developmental process. Black children are more often exposed to
adverse childhood experiences than white children. Prior studies have shown that Black people have
higher rates of posttraumatic stress disorder than white people. Covid-19 pandemic and health dispari-
ties have added to this trauma.
BMEs may be more burdened by anxiety associated with COVID-19 given the economic impacts. They
have historically had higher rates of unemployment, are more likely to work blue-collar jobs, and are less
likely to have employer-sponsored insurance. BMEs are more likely to use public transportation and fit
into the category of essential workers. Socioeconomic status may factor into disparate health outcomes
Compounding particularly the black communities fear of the COVID-19 pandemic are the multiple and
continual experiences of collective trauma through witnessed violence and maltreatment. Blacks are
frequently exposed to recordings of fellow men and women being violently assaulted or killed by those
in authority. Psychiatrists must acknowledge and validate their patients’ feelings and experiences.
The generational trauma and enduring pain of African Americans weigh heavily on their mental health.
The disparate effects of these illnesses and deaths are not new. In the 1960s racism was recognized
as a public health issue and that fact remains the same today. These disparities cannot be removed
without conscientious action and effort. We cannot simply offer prescribed treatments, services, or
care. The medical profession often builds partnerships with these groups to target the social drivers of
health. Little is done in the way of anti-racist educational training or advocacy for policies that produce
the needed resources for BMEs. Health equity can be accomplished only with a redistribution of wealth
and resources. Along with meaningful reforms that remove barriers for social programs and economic
prosperity.
Black Americans represent approximately 13% of the U.S. population. Black physicians account for only
5% of the physician workforce and are even less represented in the psychiatric workforce. Black psychi-
atrists cannot be responsible singularly in achieving equity.
The events of the past weeks highlight the imperative need that leaders in psychiatry must acknowledge
their role in community engagement. The national outrage over the deaths of Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud
Arbery, and George Floyd should herald a call to action for leadership to promote the sanctity of Black
lives and the well-being of Black patients.
Finding ways to incentivize organizations and health care systems to support education, research, and
culturally informed workforce development should be the mainstay to accomplish health equity. APA
has worked to develop the racism taskforce. Geared towards policy making and raising money/resourc-
es to follow these concerns. Fostering relationships with private organizations facilitate these agendas.
Promoting the concept of ‘buying Black.’ Supporting Black owned businesses and initiatives in commu-
nities. Investing money in properties and partnering with these grass root organizations in the commu-
nity.
Major organization should do their part. For example, the AMA started an initiative on the west side of
Chicago called the CDFI initiative and fund. By this they are contributing 2 million dollars to the commu-
nity. To help finance the needs of the community. Partnership with such organization lead to funding of
underserved communities.
According to the Washington post the US Government spent $500B dollars to bail out financial institu-
tions in 2008. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) authorizes the US
Treasury to spend up to $877B of taxpayer money to help corporations during this crisis. This begs the
question why funding is not being spent to assist those in BME communities. This drives the importance
of establishing relationships with local and state legislatures. Comprehensive efforts will be required if
we are to come through this pandemic with minimum morbidity and mortality of BME populations.
A number of paradoxes and contradictions have been highlighted during the Covid pandemic for Mental
Health.
• Therapeutic relationships need contact, so they can be compromised by the loss of physical pres-
ence materialized.
• Social life is hindered by lockdown and by the necessary lifestyle changes that people have been
required to make, but community-based services availability has been reduced, outpatient care
stopped in many places, and emergency care in hospitals is privileged.
• Psychiatric institutions (and all forms of residential care, e.g. nursing homes, social care homes,
especially of a large scale) were in many cases sources of infection, but people are staying longer
as they can be hardly discharged, their human rights have been compromised and social contacts
are limited.
• Whilst the adoption of more hygiene and health protection is necessary, there is an equal require-
ment for a robust social intervention.
• Solidarity (also at the community level) is needed, and has buffered the traumatic impact of
Covid-19, but this won’t happen per se and requires a catalyst role for community services.
Comprehensive responses are proving to be more important than individual approaches, as integrated
services respond to whole life needs of the person and the community.
Vulnerable people impacted by poverty, racism, ageism, homelessness, isolation and marginalisation,
especially those with pre-existing Mental Health problems should receive interventions first of all, and
the response should be especially tailored to their life needs and social circumstances.
This is a moment of difficulty but also possibility for human endeavour to change and improve mental
health around the globe.
After the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, governments are called to reformulate mental health po-
licies. Health - as a right per se - is included within the wider range of human rights and connected to
social determinants and human development (Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs).1 As declared by
the Lancet Commission on Global Mental Health and Sustainable Development, “an historic opportunity
exists to reframe the global mental health agenda in the context of the broad conceptualisation of men-
tal health and disorder envisioned in the SDGs”.2 SDGs allow to broaden the global mental health agenda
from a focus on reducing the treatment gap for people affected by mental disorders to the improvement
of mental health for whole populations and reducing the contribution of mental disorders to the global
burden of disease.
The World Federation for Mental Health issued an Appeal for National Plans for Mental Health during
the Coronavirus Global Emergency.3 This required to all countries and their governments to ensure that
national mental health plans are designed to manage the mental health consequences of the global
coronavirus health emergency. It is undisputed that the current COVID-19 emergency will have long-la-
sting consequences and effects on the mental health of all people, affecting the general population with
astonishingly heightened stress. The real impact on mental health is occuring today, when people en-
counter the consequences of human and economic losses together with depressive and anger feelings,
post-traumatic symptoms and other conditions. On the other hand, impoverishment of services, their
reduction and mergers, and the shortage of staff that are already present due to the underlying econo-
mic crisis in most countries can leave mental health at the bottom of the list of health priorities. This is
especially impacting on people with pre-existing mental health conditions.4
In Europe, where for 20 years so far the International Mental Health Collaborating Network (a voting
member organization of the WFMH) aims to bring together good practices and services. The IMHCN,
established by a first group of leading mental health organizations , under the aegis of WHO Geneva in
2001, is currently working for a whole life, whole system, whole community approach to mental heal-
thcare. There are several organizations who have already (or are trying to) set up a whole community
system of care with a demonstration of cost-effectivness. Places like Trieste (and the Region Friuli Ve-
nezia Giulia) in Italy, Lille in France (which are WHO Collaborating Centres), Asturias in Spain, Cavan and
Monaghan in Ireland, Cornwall, Plymouth and South Wales in the UK, Lyngby (Copenhagen), Utrecht in
the Netherlands, Prague, etc. have closed their psychiatric hospitals or have at least severely limited and
/ or eventually excluded the use of coercion and seclusion5. These services have reacted to the limita-
tions imposed by the Covid-19 policy in proactive way, not just closing outpatient services but providing
outreach, home supports, integrated personalized interventions, prevention of hospitalization, remote
online support including group therapies, and responding to primary needs of those in social isolation
or deprivation.
2- Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. www.thelan-
cet.com Published online, October9,2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X
3- The World Federation for Mental Health (2020) Appeal for National Plans for Mental Health during the Coronavirus Global
Emergency. https://wfmh.global/mental-health-and-covid-19- appeal/
4- Mezzina R, Sashidharan SP, Rosen A, Killaspy H, Saraceno B. Mental health at the age of cororanvirus: time for change.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, published online, 29 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01886-w
5- International Mental Health Collaborating Network. www.imhcn.org
Apart from a pocket of countries, Ministries has so far issued skeletal service notes aimed at reducing
risks and little more. But if not now, when?
To achieve Mental Health for All, access should be greater, not only to psychiatric care and services,
but to a welfare community, e.g. to responses to social determinants of health and disease, to social
programs, to social and collective resources, to human relationships.
The promotion of mental health was at the center of a recent European initiative (EU-Compass for Action
on Mental Health and Wellbeing, 2015-2018)7, where the concept of cross-governmental action (cross
government: Mental health in all policies approach), even led to speculation about the exclusion of the
Ministry of Health. Mental Health in All Policies (MHiAP) is an approach to promote population mental
health and wellbeing by initiating and facilitating action within different non-health public policy areas.
MHiAP emphasizes the impacts of public policies on mental health determinants, strives to reduce
mental health inequalities, aims to highlight the opportunities offered by mental health to different poli-
cy areas, and reinforces the accountability of policy-makers for mental health impact.
6- UN Secretary-General Policy Brief: COVID-19 and the need for action on mental health. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.
un.org/files /un_policy_brief-covid_and_mental_health_final.pdf
7- European Union. EU-Compass. Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being. Mental Health in All Policies. Situation analysis
and recommendations for action. 2017
8- Mental Health Atlas 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Current investment in Mental Health in Europe is uneven and not related to the country GDP. In 2015, the
overall costs related to mental ill-health are estimated to have exceeded 4% of GDP across the 28 EU
countries, but rangig from 2.1 in Romania to 5.0 in Norway. (OECD)9
Some countries like Italy have invested only 3.5 % of their total Healthcare funds, also due to the closure
of large psychiatric institutions for many years (recently fornesic hospitals), while other have reached
nuch higher rates as 15% like France (with more than 80.000 inpatients) or despite a substantial re-
duction of beds (the UK).10
HIC should invest at least 10% of their healthcare budget, while LIC at least 5% (see table)11
Large psychiatric hospitals still exist in Central and East Europe, representing almost the sole respon-
se for people with severe mental health issues. Expected changes from the very progressive Helsinki
Declaration (2005), the European WHO Mental Health Action Plan (2013-2020), the Green paper (2006),
the European Pact for Mental Health and Wellbeing (2008) and other relevant policy documents have
not occurred in a sistemic way. The urge for human rights based on the CRPD and its implementation in
Europe, despite efforts like the WHO QualityRights Programme, have not achieved a substantial imple-
mentation.12
Investing resources in mental health means many things. First of all it means attention, appeal to public
opinion, focus on collective needs to promote a better quality of life.
It can even mean more money to psychiatric hospitals, asylums and other places of seclusion. Already
in the world they absorb more than 80 percent of the resources allocated to mental health.
We want investments that increase the social capital of communities and individuals, which are media-
ted by programs and services that increase user confidence.
We want investments that bring people with psychosocial disabilities, who are the new poor and who are
tied to addictions and who are denied the possible autonomy of a life project, out of poverty.
We want productive investments that transform people’s lives and the community services themselves,
which are often their most important support.
9- OECD/EU (2018), Health at a Glance: Europe 2018: State of Health in the EU Cycle, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.
org/10.1787/health_glance_eur-2018-en
10- European Union. EU-Compass. Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being. Mental Health in All Policies. Situation analy-
sis and recommendations for action. 2017
11- Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. www.thel-
ancet.com Published online, October9,2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X
12- Mezzina R, Rosen A, Amering M, Javed A (2018). The practice of freedom: human rights and the global mental health
agenda. In Advances in Psychiatry (ed. KD Fountoulakis, A Javed). Springer: New York, 483-515
Thus we need to emphasize the importance of community based services, operating 24 hrs a day, 7
days a week, to mainstream them in healthcare organizations and integrating them with welfare servi-
ces, promoting prevention of disability through early interventions, contrast to institutionalizazion, and
responding to whole life needs, from housing to work to social inclusion.
Such services need to be planned, delivered and evaluated in co-production with stakeholders, starting
from people with lived experience and their carers. The low level of coercive care is one of the most
encouraging indicators, as in Italy.13
Key messages
1. The Covid-19 has distressed human environments and individuals worldwide, especially those with
existing mh conditions and related services. It has also created a need for more integrated community
interventions, also addressing social determinants of health.
2. Mental healthcare is underfunded everywhere in the world including Europe, but nonetheless re-
markable cost-effective good experiences have been developed involving the society at large and ad-
dressing social determinants.
3. Mental health must be involved in all policies, and investment must enhance community services,
close to people and their living environments, moving away from institutions, as UN and WHO are claim-
ing today.
Table
LMICs should increase their mental health allocation to at least 5% and high-income countries to at
least 10% of the total health budget. This increase should be in addition to allocation for other deve-
lopmental priorities that will also be supportive of mental health. Although additional resources are
essential, immediate opportunities exist for more efficient and effective use of existing resources—
for example, through the redistribution of mental health budgets from large hospitals to district hospi-
tal and community-based local services, the introduction of early interventions for emerging mental
disorders, and the re-allocation of budgets for other health priorities to promote integration of mental
health care in established platforms of delivery.
13- Mezzina R. Forty years of the Law 180: the aspirations of a great reform, its success and continuing need. Epidemiology
and Psychiatric Sciences (2018), 27, 336–345. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/S2045796018000070
DR INGRID DANIELS
TARYN DU TOIT
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented and rampant impact on societies across the world.
The first case of Coronavirus was confirmed by the Minister of Health, Dr Zweli Mkhize, in South Africa
on 5 March 2020, after a South African citizen who returned from Italy was diagnosed with the virus.
Until that stage South Africa was largely unaffected while the disease raged uncontrollably in the north
with a staggering 95 324 Coronavirus infection rate reported globally (WHO, 2020).
The South African government decreed a National State of Disaster and officially went into a hard lock-
down on the 27 March 2020 with 61 infections and 2 deaths reported. The decision to lockdown much
earlier compared to Europe and elsewhere was primarily to reduce the transmission and death rates but
to also urgently strengthen the capacity of the health system and psychosocial emergency response of
an already over-burden public health system to cope with the predicted infection peak between June -
November 2020.
South Africa had particular geo-physical, comorbidity, socio-economic and transmission risk factors to
take into account. The country recognised that, unlike high income countries, it had distinct challenges
and concerns pertaining to these risks. Concerns pertaining to the rapid spread of the virus amongst
large populations living in congested and overcrowded townships where isolation or quarantine was
virtually impossible became focal points for management. There were further concerns regarding an
already over-burdened public health sector that would be under enormous pressure to cope with large
demands for emergency, ICU and ventilation facilities.
As countries were going into lockdown and physical distancing and, isolation became a prerequisite to
prevention and contamination, concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on mental health of individuals
were further identified globally.
The virus does not discriminate and therefore everyone was exposed and vulnerable. Greater mental
health distress amongst South Africans became prevalent as COVID-19 infection rates increased over
the weeks while the locked down economy impacted on many households.
The impact of the virus on poverty in many communities was exposed in the most dramatic way. The di-
vide between rich and poor and privileged versus under-privileged revealed gross inequalities within the
South African context. Lund et al. (2011) stated that “mental ill health and poverty interact in a negative
cycle in low-income and middle-income countries.” Funk, Drew, and Knapp (2012) noted that “the poor
are disproportionately affected by mental disorders” (p. 166). Thus, they were also unduly affected by
COVID-19 and the mental health consequences.
Seedat (2020) warned that, “In the face of the restrictions and accompanying economic hardship, South
Africa’s youth and persons with pre-existing mental illness may be especially hard hit by the potentially
severe and long-term mental health consequences of the Covid-19 crisis. The stress, fear and emotional
pain induced by the rapid and aggressive spread of infection, as well as the scale of prolonged grief from
the sudden and massive loss of life, will be felt for a long time, and by successive generations.”
As the infection rate increased over the weeks, the COVID-19 pandemic not only presented a health
emergency but also a mental health crisis and a dire need for humanitarian aid in the intervention pack-
ages of care.
However, coordinated national COVID-19 mental health intervention plans were found to be lacking.
Thus, mental health implementation responses varied greatly across and within the nine provinces of
South Africa. Even though mental health COVID-19 provincial plans were often fragmented, pockets of
best practice were identified. Mental health non-profit organisations who preempted the lockdown were
better prepared and able to reorganise their services while others experienced the lockdown as a barrier
and limitation to provide accessible mental health care during the emergency and extended lockdown
periods. The unpredicted mental health consequence of the virus impacted heavily on frontline essential
health workers which included a wide range of health professionals during this time.
Cape Mental Health (CMH) the oldest community-based non-profit organisation in South Africa, with a
proud history spanning 107 years, committed to providing comprehensive, proactive and enabling men-
tal health services to persons with intellectual disability and those with mental illnesses in the Western
Cape Province was one such organisation who maximised the lockdown advance notice to design its
remote mental health service. The organisation has a track record of mental health service excellence
in poor, under-resourced and densely populated communities. The Western Cape Province, in which it
operates, was the epicenter of the pandemic in South Africa with the largest infection and death rates
seen not only in the country but also on the African continent at the time.
The pandemic created the opportunity to shift, reinvent and reorganise the way the organisation pro-
vides mental health care from facility to home and face to face counselling to virtual interventions and
most importantly to retain contact, reduce isolation and continue virtual interactions with beneficiaries
and all who required mental health support. In the planning stage of this model, the organisation rec-
ognised that approximately 98% of their beneficiaries had cellular phones which became a vital tool for
migrating the mental health service remotely.
Despite the lockdown restrictions, the organisation was able to keep their ‘doors open’ by maintaining
and building relationships and communicating with those in need about the services using remote tech-
nology such as; cellular phone applications, virtual IT technology or any other platforms, Skype, tele-
phonic counselling and assessments, social media engagement, as well as video-conferencing where
possible.
The entire switchboard or telephony system of the organisation migrated to a cellular phone. All tele-
phone calls to any of the organisations’ programmes were automatically diverted to one cellular phone
operated by the receptionist at her home to relay all messages. Data management to render the service
was centralised within our Administration Department.
A comprehensive basket of mental health services were offered during the lockdown period to ensure
regular contact with service users and their families or caregivers to lessen their isolation, nurture their
mental health and offer messages of hope. The remote mental health package of care provided includ-
ed the following;
(cellular phone applications, SMS messages, telephone calls or e-mails) to service-users with emo-
tional adjustment problems, psychosocial disability/ mental illness, intellectual disability and any-
one requiring support during this time.
Psychosocial Rehabilitation
• Psychosocial rehabilitation services were provided to adults with psychosocial disabilities/mental
illness through daily contact with mental health users who participate in Fountain House and com-
munity-based psychosocial rehabilitation groups. Photos, video clips, voice and text messages from
service users with mental illness testified of their enthusiasm. Implementing activities such as art
and crafts, washing of hands, physical exercises, and life skills training, to enhance resilience and
mental health were activated daily. Daily mental health check-ins were done to facilitate additional
support and services to those in need were also provided.
Left: a service user has made a flower vase out of a plastic bottle as a gift for
a family member.
Service-users enjoy the creative activities that are sent by cellular phone ap-
plications and video clips – especially easy-to-follow recipes for baking and
using recycled materials to make things.
“As a parent with a special needs child, we rely on our special care
centres and their trained teachers to send through the activities via
cellular phone applications.
Doing the daily activity and singing the songs I can see from my child’s
facial expression that he remembers. Seeing the smile and enjoyment
when they do some of these activities is just priceless.
I am happy and grateful for the help in the form of the daily activities
so I don’t need to think about what I need to do next as my child’s day
is planned already.
This is for our special needs children but the whole family can enjoy it
and take part.”
Community-based Accommodation
• Implementing a comprehensive and safe COVID-19 regulated community-based living for residents
with intellectual disability and those with mental illness in two community-based accommodations
continued. They were supported by care-workers and cross psycho-social rehabilitation programme
activities were implemented.
This model has been highly successful - 190 850 contacts over a 12 week period was made with 2 417
direct beneficiaries across all programmes since the start of lockdown in South Africa. See Appendix
5 – CMH Consolidated Statistics – COVID-19 Mental Health Interventions.
Concern regarding the mental health of frontline health workers and others intervening in the treatment
of COVID-19 increased significantly. High COVID-19 infection rates amongst health workers including
mental distress, anxiety, depression and COVID-19 fatigue were observed. The Covid-19 pandemic rav-
aging through the country required a mental health response to the health workers as critical essential
personnel. As a result, a nationwide Healthcare Worker Support Network, spearheaded by the SA Soci-
ety of Psychiatrists, the SA Medical Association, the Psychological Society of SA, the SA Society of An-
esthesiologists and the SA Depression and Anxiety Group launched a toll-free 24-hour helpline managed
by 200 volunteer psychologists.
The most successful mental health COVID-19 mental health interventions evident were where strong
partnerships and multi-sectoral collaborations existed to ensure that an effective holistic bio-psycho-so-
cial and humanitarian response was delivered in the package of care.
Conclusion
South Africa continued to see a daily average increase of COVID-19 infections of over 8 000 during July
as it peaked upwards. The COVID-19 infection rates are bleak with more than 538 000 individuals in-
fected, 387 000 recovered, 9064 deaths (COVID-19 Statistics SA, 07 August 2020). At this stage, South
Africa had the 5th highest infection rate in the world.
Unlike many countries who locked down further during the peak in infections, South Africa relaxed many
of the lockdown measures resulting in increased transmission exposure due to their particularly unique
risk factors. This situation was predicted to get significantly worse over the next weeks as COVID-19
infections spread.
As infections increase so will the mental health consequences thereof. The mental health consequenc-
es of COVID-19 will remain beyond and after a cure has been found. Mental health management and in-
terventions will be of critical importance beyond the COVID-19 pandemic while COVID-19 mental health
intervention plans are urgently required to strategically address in the growing need.
On return to facilities after lockdown, hybrid models and approaches to intervention may be introduced
since the COVID-19 remote mental health services have shown significant success in contacts with
beneficiaries during this crisis in South Africa.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organisation. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 45. Geneva. Retrieved from
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200305-sitrep-45-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=ed-
2ba78b_4
2. Bradshaw, D., Norman, R., & Schneider, M. (2007). A clarion call for action based on refined DALY estimates for South
Africa. Editorial. South African Medical Journal, 97, 438–440.
3. Williams, D R, Herman, A, Stein, D J, Heeringa, S G, Jackson, P B, & Moomal, H. (2008). Prevalence, Service Use and
Demographic Correlates of 12-Month Psychiatric Disorders in South Africa: The South African Stress and Health Study.
Psychological Medicine, (2008) 211–220. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718686/.
4. Lund, C., De Silva, M., Plagerson, S., Cooper, S., Chisholm, D., Das, J., Knapp, M., & Patel, V. (2011). Poverty and mental
disorders; breaking the cycle in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet series global mental health, 1–3.
5. Funk, M., Drew, N., & Knapp, M. (2012). Mental health, poverty and development. Journal of Public Mental Health, 11 (4),
166–185. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/47609/1/Mental%20health%20poverty%20and%20development%20
(lsero).pdf.
6. Seedat S. (2020). OPINION | Covid-19: May be prudent to over-estimate the mental health consequences of the virus.
Retrieved from https://www.health24.com/Medical/Infectious-diseases/Coronavirus/opinion-covid-19-may-be-prudent-
to-over-estimate-the-mental-health-consequences-of-the-virus-20200526-2
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/capementalhealth
• Twitter: https://twitter.com/CMH_NGO
• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cape-mental-health
• Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/capementalhealth/
• Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCflINdS7CE9FBu42cSKkiMA
MENTAL HEALTH
IN THIS TIME OF
COVID-19
BE CONSCIOUS
Being aware and taking care of your
mental health has now become a critical
task to cope with the ongoing pandemic. It
is important for you to know that fear and
anxiety can lead to strong emotions of
hopelessness. You need to address these
stress factors to in order to cope during
this trying time.
IDENTIFY:
Taking care and responsibility for yourself
and those around you during the COVID-
19 pandemic can be stressful. It is
important to identify the following stress
factors:
TAKE CARE
There are many ways in which you can
take care of your mental health. Focus on
these three activities to help you cope with
being in lockdown:
STAY POSITIVE
It is important that we remain positive and
hopeful during this trying time.
Physical Distancing
To stay away from people you can follow the rules below.
The President said all South Africans must stay home from
Thursday 26 March 2020 until Friday 17 April 2020.
For example,
Page 1
For example,
Page 2
19641
20000
16660
16125
15099
15000
12347
11592
10000
8330 8600
6912
6406
5000
3197
1462 1445 1415
1445 1768 1418
729 1288 1322 876 990
717
0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
2. A Cough.
5. A sore body.
Page 1
The person on the phone will help you know what to do.
Do not panic.
Page 2
1. Stay at home.
3. Only touch your face after you have washed your hands.
CHRISTOFFEL GROBLER
MD Psych, Associate Professor WSU and Medical Advisor to Mindful Revolution
CASSEY CHAMBERS
Operations Director, SADAG
LEON DE BEER
PhD, Professor of Industrial Psychology, Director of the WorkWell Research Unit, NWU
Introduction
Life with COVID-19 and subsequent lockdown measures has changed everything familiar about 21st-
century living and we find our inner world disrupted and our emotions in turmoil.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syn-
drome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. On the 30th of
January 2020 the WHO declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and
a pandemic on 11 March. On 5 March 2020, Minister of Health, Dr Zweli Mkhize, confirmed that the virus
spread to South Africa, with the first known patient being a citizen who tested positive upon his return
from Italy.
On 13 May 2020, Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN), urged all governments,
civil society, health authorities, and other role players (including employers), to address mental health as
an essential part of their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The UN published a Policy Brief regard-
ing the need for mental health action stating that “Although the COVID-19 crisis is, in the first instance,
a physical health crisis, it has the seeds of a major mental health crisis as well if action is not taken”. The
UN predicts a long-term upsurge in the number and severity of mental health problems globally because
of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people. Also, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and
Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) position mental health promotion during the return
to work process as being an essential part of the OSH response to the COVID-19 pandemic. A mental ill-
ness crisis is looming as millions of people worldwide are surrounded by death and disease and forced
into isolation, poverty and anxiety by the pandemic of COVID-19 according to UN health experts.
Early in June 2020, more than 6 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported in more than 188 coun-
tries, resulting in more than 380 000 deaths. In South Africa, by the 23rd of June, over 100 000 positive
cases had been identified, 53 444 people had recovered, and 1991 people had died.
“The impact of the pandemic on people’s mental health is already extremely concerning,” according to
Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization. “Social isolation, fear of con-
tagion, and loss of family members is compounded by the distress caused by loss of income and often
employment.” Dr Dévora Kestel, Director of the Department of Mental Health and Substance Use at the
World Health Organization, recommends the scaling-up and reorganisation of mental health services
on a global scale to build a mental health system that is fit for the future. She suggests developing and
funding national plans that shift care away from institutions to community services, ensuring coverage
for mental health conditions in health insurance packages and building the human resource capacity to
deliver quality mental health and social care in the community.
Prof Soraya Seedat, Head of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Stellenbosch Medical
School, suggests that it “may be prudent to over-estimate the mental health sequelae and the resources
that will be required” in a News24 article on 27 May 2020. She quoted research that suggested, thirty
months after the SARS outbreak in 2003, a third of survivors met criteria for any psychiatric disorder; a
quarter met criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); and approximately 16% had depressive
disorders.
Authors Horesh and Brown argue that, like other mass traumatic events, the Covid-19 pandemic is ex-
pected to result in PTSD, with typical features of hypervigilance (centered on protective measures to
avoid infection), intrusive thoughts (related to infection, health, fears of dying), avoidance, and negative
mood and cognitions (around fears of the world-changing and the future being bleak) that will be subjec-
tively distressing and persistently impact on day-to-day functioning over time. They aptly liken COVID-19
to an ongoing “cardiac stress test” on the world’s infrastructures and systems, magnifying their func-
tional and structural vulnerability, including that of the field of traumatic stress.
The South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG, 2020) reported that calls to their help-line
doubled since the beginning of the lockdown on 27 March. In an online survey in April 2020 they found
59% of respondents stating that they felt “stressed/very stressed” before lockdown, rising to 65% during
the lockdown. The survey found the main challenges during lockdown to be:
In 2013, American psychiatrist and climate change activist Dr Lise Van Susteren coined the term ‘pre-
traumatic stress disorder’ (though the honour should properly go to satire website The Onion, which
in 2006 featured an article on a condition with the same name) to describe stress reactions related to
possible rather than past events. According to Van Susteren, the two conditions are phenomenologically
alike, but in pre-traumatic stress disorder ‘we have in our minds images of the future that reflect what
scientists are telling us’.
The most prominent study so far of pre-traumatic stress disorder was done in 2014 by Dorthe Berntsen
and David C Rubin. They defined the condition as ‘disturbing future-oriented cognition and images as
measured in terms of a direct temporal reversal of the conceptualisations of past-directed cognition
in the PTSD diagnosis’. Looking at a group of Danish soldiers before, during and after their deployment
to Afghanistan, Bernsten and Rubin found that pre-traumatic responses – involuntary intrusive images
and thoughts, high levels of arousal and attempts at avoidance – were experienced at the same level
as post-traumatic responses. Their second finding was that pre-traumatic stress reactions are a strong
predictor for the development of post-traumatic symptoms.
To measure the pre-traumatic responses of the soldiers, Bernsten and Rubin created the ‘pre- traumatic
stress reactions checklist (PreCL)’, adapting the first eight items of the PTSD checklist contained in
the DSM-IV – the then-current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the
American Psychiatric Association – while leaving the remaining nine items unchanged.
In reconceptualising the temporality of trauma, Bernsten and Rubin are not so much laying the ground-
work for a new pathology (anticipatory or pre-traumatic stress disorder is not found in the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) in as much as they are attempting to expand our current
understanding of PTSD.
‘Future research’, they write, ‘should examine whether [the PreCL] also may be used as a screening in-
strument in relation to non-military traumatic events as well as other subjectively stressful events, such
as exams, medical procedures, or childbirth.’
Although everyone is experiencing crisis at some level, it can be argued, people are not experiencing it in
the same way. Furthermore, some groups are more vulnerable to developing mental health issues during
the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, those with existing mental illness, lower socioeconomic status,
and individuals who experienced previous trauma (Burgess et al, 2019; Gray et al, 2003; Martin-Soelch
& Schnyder, 2019)
Enter the concept of Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Pre-TSD) which the authors postulate may contrib-
ute to the discourse around the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; a syndrome involving
involuntary, intrusive images, and flash-forwards of haunting events that could be experienced because of
a major disruption (Berntsen & Rubin, 2015; Bomyea, Risbrough, & Lang, 2012)
The result of Pre-TSD, as described above, is fear of the future and loss of control (feelings of constant
uncertainty and insecurity). If these factors are not addressed proactively, the mental wellbeing of peo-
ple is affected, possibly predisposing the individual to the development of anxiety, depression or PTSD
(Wild et al.,2016).
The symptoms of continuous pre-traumatic stress experiences are postulated to be (Heinrichs et al.,
2005; Elwood et al., 2007; Wild et al.,2016).
The characteristic COVID-19 related concerns that could predispose to pre-traumatic stress are (United
Nations, 2020; ILO, 2020; IOL. 2020(b)):
• Job-related concerns:
• Lay-offs, pay cuts, future employment possibilities, commuting and travelling, social interaction
at work.
• Personal concerns:
• Ability to provide for the family, family health and wellbeing, personal health and wellbeing,
childcare and schooling, and social interaction with family and friends.
• Country concerns:
• Food security, the country’s economy and its ability to recover from the disruption.
However, in human behaviour, the presence of the negative, i.e., pre-traumatic stress symptoms, does not
mean the absence of the positive, i.e., experiences of hope (Demerouti, Mostert, & Bakker, 2010). Hope
and a sense of “taking action” combined with excellent social support, at work and in life, are mitigat-
ing factors for stress experiences. These positive factors should be promoted to buffer the impact of
pre-traumatic stress experiences on individual functioning.
Research Background
Assessment Instrument
Afriforte (the commercial arm of the WorkWell Research Unit, Faculty Economic and Management Sci-
ences, NWU, Potchefstroom), developed an instrument to objectively assess the COVID-19 experiences
of employees: MyCovid19Experiences©. The instrument was developed following a validation research
project conducted during April 2020 (www.lifewithcovid19.co.za/dashboard). The MyCovid19Experienc-
es instrument measures the following dimensions:
• Hope levels
• Concern levels
• A self-rating of Covid-19-specific concerns:
• Job loss, Pay cuts, Ability to provide for family, Family health and wellbeing, Own health and
wellbeing, Country’s Economy, Food security, Commuting and travelling, Future Personal financ-
es, Future Social interaction, Future Employment, and Childcare and Schooling
• The norm-based incidence of stress-related psychological (Pre-TSD risk) and stress-related physical
ill-health symptoms
The stress-related psychological (Pre-TSD) and physical ill-health measurements consist of eight and
seven items, respectively. Regarding the reliability of the constructs, statistical analysis indicated much
higher alpha and omega reliability coefficients for both constructs in terms of the acceptable guideline
in the social sciences of α and ω > 0.70 (Sijtsma, 2009). In terms of validity, confirmatory factor analysis
was conducted to model the factors. The factor loadings for the latent variables of both constructs
were acceptable in terms of statistical cut-off points, i.e. loadings > 0.50; small standard errors for all
loadings indicating the accuracy of estimation, and also acceptable communalities in terms of variance
explained (Kline, 2011). Therefore, the measurement properties of stress-related ill-health symptoms are
acceptable according to the most stringent standards of statistical modelling today.
Sample
A sample of 1656 South African employees who completed the Mycovid19experiences assessment
between 15 May - 15 June 2020 were selected from the Afriforte database (South Africa in Lockdown 4
and 3). Although the sample is a non-probability convenient sample, it would provide a good indication
of the experiences of South African employees over the 30-day timeframe. The characteristics of the
sample are displayed in Table 3.
# % of sample
Gender
Age Group
Children
No 359 21.7%
Relationship Status
Divorced 91 5.5%
Engaged 77 4.6%
Life-partner 79 4.8%
Other 13 0.8%
Widowed 30 1.8%
*Worker Type
* This breakdown was only available for selection by participants since 5 June 2020. The results of the “early” remote worker
sample are discussed in the article.
Results
Concerns about the future
Participants were asked to rate how much more concerned they are about the future since the outbreak
of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results are provided in Table 4.
Extremely Con-
Not at all Concerned A little bit Concerned Quite Concerned Very Concerned
cerned
Gender
Age Groups
Children
Worker Type
From the total sample, 49% of employees indicated high concern levels while only 2% reported not to be
concerned about the future following the COVID-19 outbreak. There is no difference between males and
females, however, concern levels appear to be higher for younger age groups (between 20- 39 years) and
employees with children.
Participants were asked to rate how hopeful they feel about the future given our current situation. The
results are provided in Table 5.
Extremely Hopeful Very Hopeful Quite Hopeful A little bit Hopeful Not at all Hopeful
Gender
Age Groups
Children
Worker Type
From the total sample, only 4% of employees indicated despair about the future (not at all hopeful);
77% of the sample experience decent hope levels. This is a particularly positive result as it indicates
that although concern levels are evident the presence of the positive (HOPE) is also evident for a large
proportion of the sample of South African employees. Slightly less overall hope is evident for older age
groups (50 and older) and a larger portion of this age group experience despair. Also, remote workers
appear to be more hopeful.
Rating of concerns
Participants were asked to rate specific concerns about several aspects of their lives given the current
Covid-19 situation. Figure 1 displays the ranked concern ratings.
The top concerns for the sample of South African employees are the Country’s Economy, Childcare and
Schooling, Family Health and Wellbeing and Future Career Possibilities. Providing for my Family, Food se-
curity, and Pay-cuts are also ranked as areas of concern for over 50% of the employee sample. Interesting
to note that only 40% of the sample of the sample ranked Losing their jobs as a huge concern. The top
three concerns per biographical breakdown are provided in Table 6.
Overall Sample Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Family Health and Wellbeing Future Career
(n=1656) Possibilities
Gender
Male (n=835) Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Future Career Possibilities
Female (n=821) Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Family Health and Wellbeing
Age Groups
20-29 (n=245) Country’s Economy Family Health and Wellbeing Future Career Possibilities
30-39 (n=549) Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Family Health and Wellbeing
40-49 (n=472) Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Future Career Possibilities
Children
Yes (n=1297) Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Providing for Family
No (n=359) Country’s Economy Family Health and Wellbeing Future Career Possibilities
Worker Type
Remote (n=376) Country’s Economy Childcare and Schooling Family Health and Wellbeing
The Country’s Economy is the top concern for all biographical groups. However, for the pre-retirement
employee group (>59), Personal Finances and Providing for Family are more dominant concerns, this
might be related to fears that retirement provisions would be inadequate because of the impact of the
Covid-19 disruption on the economy.
Stress Results
Pre-TSD risks (Psychological Distress)
This section shows the norm-based incidence of Pre-TSD risks, i.e. compared to the norm for psycho-
logical distress, an individual is at high risk, moderate risk, or low risk of experiencing Pre-TSD symp-
toms. The results of the participants are aggregated to a group level to indicate the group incidence of
Pre-TSD risks. The typical Pre-TSD symptoms include, inter alia, frequent upsetting thoughts, constant
feelings of uncertainty, mood swings, irritability, etc. Table 7 displays the incidence of Pre-TSD per bi-
ographical group.
Norm-based Incidences High Pre-TSD risk Moderate Pre-TSD risk Low Pre-TSD risk
Gender
Age Groups
Children
Worker Type
From the total sample of South African employees, 46% are at high risk Pre-TSD and associated symp-
toms; only 26% are at low risk. Females (52%), Remote workers (53%), and the pre-retirement group
(49%) are at higher risk. Further analysis indicated that widowed (n=30) and divorced (n=91) employ-
ees are also at higher risk of experiencing PTSD. High levels of psychological distress can result in risk
behaviour, and the development of anxiety syndromes and depressive disorders in the long run. Pre-TSD
experiences have a negative impact on the functioning of employees at work, i.e., lower productivity,
increase in mistakes and errors, poorer customer service, and higher risks for accidents and injuries at
work.
Experiences of chronic psychological distress result in people experiencing stress-related physical ill
health symptoms such as, frequent headaches, nausea, heartburn, eating problems, palpitations, sleep
problems, and muscle pains and aches. Chronic psychological and physical distress can cause changes
in blood pressure, blood glucose and cholesterol levels, and cause impaired immune responses, to men-
tion a few. This section displays the incidence of stress-related physical ill-health symptoms in terms
of norm percentile categories, i.e. compared to the norm an individual is at high risk, moderate risk, or
low risk of experiencing stress-related physical ill-health symptoms. Table 8 displays the incidence of
Stress-related Physical Distress per biographical group.
Gender
Age Groups
Children
Worker Type
From the total sample of South African employees, 35% are experiencing a high incidence of stress- re-
lated physical ill health symptoms. Females (47%), Remote workers (49%), and mid- and mature- career
employees show higher risks for experiencing stress-related physical symptoms. The latter result is a
concern in terms of the overall physical health impact of the Covid-19 disruption on this older group of
employees who might be more vulnerable for developing metabolic syndrome risks in future.
From a theoretical perspective, Hope (the presence of the positive) is a mitigating factor for the devel-
opment of Pre-TSD. Figure 2 shows the relationship between Hope and the experience of Psychological
Distress (Pre-TSD) for the sample of South African employees.
The results for a sample of South African employees confirm the mitigating effect of Hope on the de-
velopment of Pre-TSD. As Hope levels increase, the experience of Pre-TSD symptoms decrease for the
sample of South African employees. Proactively, promoting Hope would have a positive impact on em-
ployee functioning. This is an important result for employers to take note of.
Summary of Results
• High concerns levels about the future is evident for 49% of employees following the COVID- 19 out-
break. Concern levels are higher for career enterers and career builders (age group 20- 39 years) and
employees with children. There is no significant difference between male and female employees.
• Most employees are hopeful; decent hope levels are evident for 77% of employees despite concerns
about the future. Slightly less overall hope is evident for older age groups (50 and older) and a larger
portion of this age group experiences despair. Remote workers appear to be more hopeful.
• The top concerns for the sample of South African employees are the Country’s Economy, Childcare
and Schooling, Family Health and Wellbeing and Future Career Possibilities. Providing for Family, Food
security, and Pay-cuts are also ranked as areas of concern for over 50% of the employee sample.
Only 40% of the sample ranked Losing their jobs as a huge concern.
• 46% of employees are at high risk of Pre-TSD and associated symptoms. Females, Remote workers,
the pre-retirement age group, and widowed and divorced employees are at higher risk of Pre-TSD in
the sample. Risk behaviour, anxiety syndromes, and depressive disorders are future risks for 46% of
employees.
• 35% of employees are experiencing a high incidence of stress-related physical ill health symptoms.
Females, Remote workers, and mid- and mature-career employees show higher risks for experienc-
ing stress-related physical symptoms. The overall physical health impact of the Covid-19 disruption
on this older group of employees is a concern – might contribute to metabolic syndrome risks in
future.
• The results for the sample of South African employees support the mitigating effect of Hope on the
development of Pre-TSD. As Hope levels increase, the experience of Pre-TSD symptoms decrease.
Promoting Hope could have a positive impact on employee functioning. This is an important result
for employers to take note of.
Recommendations
Mental health service providers, the Medical insurance industry, and Employers should take note of
these results.
Mental health service providers can expect an increase in patient volume. An objective assessment of an
individual’s experiences with a reliable instrument such as the Mycovid19experiences© could assist ser-
vice providers to ascertain the level of mental health impairment for customised intervention purposes,
e.g., an individual with high concern levels, low hope levels, and high levels of Pre-TSD and stress-relat-
ed physical symptoms requires urgent assistance and mental health evaluation, including evaluating
behavioural risks at a personal level, such as suicide ideation, substance abuse, and other possible
dysfunctional risks.
The medical insurance industry should prepare for an increase in mental health expenses over the next
two years. Medical insurers could consider making use of COVID-19 related mental health risk instru-
ments for example the Mycovid19experiences© diagnostic instrument, as an insured benefit to mem-
bers as part of their underwriting risk management and disease management strategies.
To proactively address the mental health risks of employees due to COVID-19 related concerns, collab-
oration between medical insurers and corporate employer groups is is required.
Conclusion
Employers are best positioned to proactively mitigate the mental health impact of the COVID-19 disrup-
tion on a large number of citizens. Mental health promotion should be part of the COVID-19 business
recovery strategy. The COVID-19 disruption significantly increased the stress levels of employees and
moreover, our work (and life) environments have changed drastically. Employees, in addition, need to
adapt to these changes, adding to increased stress experiences.
Furthermore, it is well-known that high stress levels affect employee functioning at work and contribute
to lower productivity and higher risks for mistakes and accidents in the workplace. Employers should
ensure that they stay connected with staff by assessing the stress experiences and mental health of
their staff objectively (understand where staff are) and facilitating an objective “touch base session”
with teams. The purpose of a touch base session would be to normalise fears (we are all in the same
boat), promote hope, create a sense of control by showing how being at work, working safely, and staying
healthy mitigate COVID-19 fears and concerns.
A fit-for-purpose “Employee Touch Base COVID-19 platform”, based on the results of this research, is
available to employers to proactively address mental health risks in the workplace and set employees up
for success during the business recovery process.
REFERENCES
• McNally, N.J., Bryant, R.A., & Ehlers, A. 2003. Does early psychological intervention promote recovery from post-traumatic
stress? Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 4:45–79.
• WHO. 2011. Psychological first aid: Guide for field workers
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). Reliability beyond theory and into practice. Psychometrika, 74(1), 169-173.
• SADAG. 2020. https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/lockdown-calls-to-mental-health-and-suicide-help-
lines-have-more-than-doubled-20200516)
• United Nations. 2020. Policy Brief: COVID-19 and the Need for Action on Mental Health, UN 13 May 2020
• Wild, J., Smith, K.V., Thompson, E., Bear, F., Lommen, M. & Ehlers, A. (2016). A prospective study of pre- trauma risk fac-
tors for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Psychological Medicine. -1. 10.1017/S0033291716000532.
Some sectors are just beginning to acknowledge that systems of racism are woven into the fabric of
our societies and govern access to safety from violence, quality health care, education, livelihoods and
income, and a host of other resources that influence how and when we live or die.1,2 Yet, none of this is
new. Negotiating the threats to survival that inequality and unfairness yield, or simply being exposed to
them on an ongoing basis, assaults the health, wellbeing, and life trajectories of affected communities
and individuals.2 Conversely, the social drivers that protect overall health and wellbeing—early childhood
interventions, antidiscrimination laws and policies, safe and affordable housing, employment opportu-
nities, access to quality health services-- are also foundational to mental health.3
The social conditions that permeate living, learning, working, worship, and educational environments--so-
cial determinants--contribute to our mental health throughout the course of our lives.4 Adverse experi-
ences across the lifespan, such as stigma in all its forms of prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination;
poverty and income inequality; interpersonal and collective violence; or forced migration are key de-
terminants of the emergence of mental disorders, cardiovascular disease, and of course, infectious
disease morbidity and mortality as well.3,5-7 However, diagnosing or correlating mental or other health
conditions to these exposures does not absolve us as advocates, professionals, or as a community,
from the ethical responsibility to understand and confront social processes that fuel these problems.
In this moment, the COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying civil unrest, economic disruption, and un-
employment underscore the longstanding consequences of health inequities and poor investment in
public health.8,9 These inequities occur in a global environment already marked by inadequate access to
effective mental health care for those who need it 10-12 and higher mortality rates for people with long-
term mental health problems and co-occurring medical conditions.13 This moment also highlights where
we need to take action. Greater investment and greater access to mental health and wellbeing demands
that governments, civil society, donors, and multilateral organizations act on these considerations:
The public health community long ago determined that racism is a threat to health, mental health and
wellbeing.2 Systems of racism, promote ideas of inferiority of a specific population, entrench these in
the belief systems and norms of the larger culture, allowing the legitimacy of forms of discrimination
that marginalize and devalue these groups.2 Its effects are pervasive and support implicit and explicit
bias, which not only leads to negative psychological responses in stigmatized people, but influences
how others respond to egalitarian policies or laws that affect the group16. Institutional or structural rac-
ism supports policies that sustain unfair allocation of resources and reduces access to opportunities
(through segregation, forced migration and removal). Discrimination is the behavior and route by which
people‘s access to economic, educational, medical and other social resources are curtailed.15 The con-
sequences of these processes include limited life chances, psychological distress, mood and anxiety
symptoms, increased risk of mental disorders and precursors to chronic medical conditions. Thus, the
mental health community must also challenge and dismantle the structural, as well as individual, forms
of racism that contribute to poor health and wellbeing in general, and poor mental health, specifically.
not on track to achieve most SDG targets, including those for poverty reduction, food security, inclusive
and equitable education, or income equality.17
We must continue to invest in psychosocial and behavioral interventions that reduce stigma, strengthen
interpersonal relationships, bolster social supports, and create social networks to serve as buffers for
individuals to cope with assaults on determinants of health while we work on dismantling the structures
that cause harm. Schools, clinics, and places of employment can work to bring small groups of people
together who have common backgrounds to share coping strategies, build confidence, and support
livelihoods.20 The pandemic has stimulated such community-engaged responses to vulnerable popula-
tions—responses that may also meet needs after the crisis.21
In tandem with greater attention to social determinants of health, the redesign of health systems to
integrate mental health care with other chronic disease care and the establishment of parity between
mental and other medical conditions remains a grand challenge for global mental health.22 The journey
to universal health coverage (UHC) creates a pathway to meeting this need, and it is timely. The rise in
mental health problems accompanying the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the possibility of neurocog-
nitive sequelae of SARS-CoV-2,23 serve as reminders that the separation of health from mental health is
artificial at best, harmful at worst. Injuries to health frequently have mental health consequences, and
poor mental health increases the chances of poor health outcomes. People with severe mental disor-
ders continue to experience disproportionate mortality associated with medical conditions.24
ness contribute to demand side barriers.25 Nevertheless, evidence-based models of care that integrate
mental health into primary care are available,26 as are mental health interventions that can be delivered in
differently resourced health systems,27,28 but funding for sustained implementation must be increased.
Conclusion
The tragic events of 2020, in themselves, serve as a call to action to every individual and every com-
munity that values human dignity and human rights. Racism drove the brutality witnessed in the United
States, but no society is innocent of discrimination and its ill effects-- be it by caste, by race, by ethnic-
ity, gender, or disability. This call should resonate with particular force within the global mental health
community. We have found our raging soul,31 we have marching orders from those who have given their
lives, and a plan of action from the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We have the energy of
youth around the globe united for justice, we understand the pain of exclusion, and we must respond
with purpose and intentionality.
PAMELA Y. COLLINS
MD, MPH, Professor, Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Global Health; Direc-
tor, University of Washington Global Mental Health Program, University of Washington, Seattle,
WA, USA.
DEEPA RAO
PhD, MA, Professor, Departments of Global Health and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences; Asso-
ciate Director, University of Washington Global Mental Health Program, University of Washing-
ton, Seattle, WA, USA.
REFERENCES
1. Phelan JC, Link BG. Is Racism a Fundamental Cause of Inequalities in Health? Annual Review of Sociology.
2015;41(1):311-330.
2. Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA, Vu C. Understanding how discrimination can affect health. Health services research.
2019;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1374-1388.
3. Lund C, Brooke-Sumner C, Baingana F, et al. Social determinants of mental disorders and the Sustainable Development
Goals: a systematic review of reviews. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(4):357-369.
4. WHO. Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/ 2020. Accessed August 4, 2020.
5. Millett GA, Jones AT, Benkeser D, et al. Assessing Differential Impacts of COVID-19 on Black Communities. Annals of
epidemiology. 2020;47:37-44.
6. Panza GA, Puhl RM, Taylor BA, Zaleski AL, Livingston J, Pescatello LS. Links between discrimination and cardiovascular
health among socially stigmatized groups: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217623.
7. Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA. Racism and Health: Evidence and Needed Research. Annu Rev Public Health.
2019;40:105-125.
8. Rollston R, Galea S. COVID-19 and the Social Determinants of Health. American journal of health promotion : AJHP.
2020;34(6):687-689.
9. Galea S, Abdalla SM. COVID-19 Pandemic, Unemployment, and Civil Unrest: Underlying Deep Racial and Socioeconomic
Divides. JAMA. 2020;324(3):227-228.
10. Alonso J, Liu Z, Evans-Lacko S, et al. Treatment gap for anxiety disorders is global: Results of the World Mental Health
Surveys in 21 countries. Depression and anxiety. 2018;35(3):195-208.
11. Degenhardt L, Glantz M, Evans-Lacko S, et al. Estimating treatment coverage for people with substance use disorders: an
analysis of data from the World Mental Health Surveys. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Associa-
tion (WPA). 2017;16(3):299-307.
12. Thornicroft G, Chatterji S, Evans-Lacko S, et al. Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries.
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 2017;210(2):119-124.
13. Liu NH, Daumit GL, Dua T, et al. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention
framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas. World psychiatry : official journal of the World
Psychiatric Association (WPA). 2017;16(1):30-40.
14. UN. Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Deelopment. 2020:A/RES/71/313, E/CN.313/2018/2012, E/CN.2013/2019/2012, E/CN.2013/2020/2012.
15. Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:363-385.
16. Patel V, Shekhar SS, Lund C, et al. The Lancet Commission on Global Mental Health & Sustainable Development. The
Lancet. 2018:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(1018)31612-X.
17. UN. The Sustanable Development Goals Report 2020. New York: United Nations; 2020.
18. Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, et al. Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature. 2011;475(7354):27.
19. Burgess RA, Jain S, Petersen I, Lund C. Social interventions: a new era for global mental health? Lancet Psychiatry.
2020;7(2):118-119.
20. Rao D, Andrasik MP, Lipira L. HIV stigma among Black women in the United States: intersectionality, support, resilience.
Am J Public Health. 2018;108(4):446-448. doi:410.2105/AJPH.2018.304310.
21. Endale T, St Jean N, Birman D. COVID-19 and refugee and immigrant youth: A community-based mental health perspec-
tive. Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy. 2020;12(S1):S225-s227.
22. Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, March D, Insel TR, Daar AS. Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature. 2011;475:27-
30.
23. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavi-
rus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry.
2020;7(7):611-627.
24. Firth J, Siddiqi N, Koyanagi A, et al. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in peo-
ple with mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(8):675-712.
25. Patel V, Saxena S. Achieving universal health coverage for mental disorders. Bmj. 2019;366:l4516.
26. Unutzer J, Carlo AD, Collins PY. Leveraging collaborative care to improve access to mental health care on a global scale.
World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA). 2020;19(1):36-37.
27. Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key
messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1672-1685.
28. Kola L. Global mental health and COVID-19. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(8):655-657.
29. Collins PY, von Unger H, Armbrister A. Church ladies, good girls, and locas: Stigma and the intersection of gender, ethnici-
ty, mental illness, and sexuality in relation to HIV risk. Social Science & Medicine. 2008;67(3):389-397.
30. Lee-Tauler SY, Eun J, Corbett D, Collins PY. A Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Initiation of Mental Health
Care Among Racial-Ethnic Minority Groups. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(6):628-647.
31. Horton R. Offline: A perilous birthday party for mental health. The Lancet. 2019;394:1696.
This year WFMH wants to empower people with lived experience to become actively involved in their
care they are offered.
Environments are very important, as highlighted in Healthy People 2030 and in Tackling Stigma and
Social Isolation.
We need to invest in good quality mental health facilities and mental health service users should be
involved in assessing quality of the facilities offered.
The UK PLACE programme is a good example of this, and we are grateful to NHS England / NHS Im-
provement and NHS Digital for sharing their knowledge and expertise.
Every NHS patient should be cared for with compassion and dignity in a clean, safe environment. Where
standards fall short, they should be able to draw it to the attention of managers and hold the service to
account. Patient Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) is a system for assessing the qual-
ity of the patient environment and provide motivation for improvement by providing a clear message,
directly from patients, about how the environment or services might be enhanced.
PLACE was introduced in England in 2013, it is an annual voluntary self-assessment and is the only
national programme that collects data relating to the patient environment, it provides a consistent ap-
proach so that all organisations are assessing the same things to the same standards.
The assessments involve local people (known as Patient Assessors) going into hospitals as part of
teams to assess how the environment supports the provision of clinical care, they look at hospital clean-
liness, food and hydration, support for patients’ privacy, dignity and wellbeing, general building mainte-
nance and décor, whether the environment is dementia friendly and provides for those patients, visitors
and staff with a disability. The team must include a minimum of 50 per cent patient assessors.
The results are published and show how hospitals are performing both nationally and in relation to other
hospitals providing similar service.
Assessment forms and supporting guidance documents, including patient assessor training slides
can be found on the link below:
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/areas-of-interest/estates-and-facilities/patient-led-assess-
ments-of-the-care-environment-place#supporting-guidance-documents
Gill Donachie Patient Environment Senior Policy Lead NHS Estates and Facilities Division Commercial
Directorate NHS England/NHS Improvement
https://www.who.int/health-topics/suicide#tab=tab_1
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/suicide-prevention-toolkit-for-engaging-communities
https://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/financing/investing_in_mh_2013/en/
In the spirit of World Mental Health Day and the strength and solidarity of the mental health movement,
the WFMH is proposing that we all try to do more for World Mental Health Day this year.
We are encouraging our partners to hold virtual (or in person where possible) commemorative events
for WMHD. Not only are you bringing much needed attention to the mental health discourse, you are
showing those that are facing discrimination and stigma that there is no reason to be ashamed or afraid.
Your actions will put a face to this invisible illness; you will humanize the issue, and show the decision
makers in the government and the community that your cause has validity.
This may all sound like hard work, but it doesn’t have to be. If social distancing restrictions allow you can
gather together 10-50 of your friends, family and colleagues, pick your gathering place or starting and
ending points, make some clever but peaceful signs and you’re ready to march for mental health whilst
respecting the public health policy in your country!
And if you can’t meet in person, why not join the virtual March for Mental Health?
On 9th - 10th October 2020, the World Federation for Mental Health will join partners around the world to
March for Mental Health. A 24-hour Facebook livestream will feature rallying content from expert voices,
lived experience and influencers.
Mental health campaigners in a range of different countries will lead one hour each (Argentina, Peru,
Liberia, Sierra Leone, Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Indonesia,
Philippines, Tonga, New Zealand, Australia, UK, US), and the remaining 5 hours have been allocated to
and will be led by civil society partners working globally within themes including youth mental health,
disability and mental health, LGBTQIIA+ and mental health, HIV/AIDS and mental health and ageing and
mental health.
The public will be encouraged to join the March, by watching and sharing the live stream; by using a se-
ries of Instagram filters to stand up and be counted as they call on leaders to invest in mental health for
all; or simply to join an activity on TikTok. The live stream will be hosted on a dedicated microsite that
will also feature live social media feeds and archive content from the March.
World Federation members are encouraged to join the March: you can join national partners in the
countries that will be featured in the dedicated hours or join global partners in any of the thematic hours
depending on your own priorities. You can even go for both depending on what works for your timezone.
To learn more about the march see: www.gospeakyourmind.org
Vigil or Rally- These are gatherings where people stay in one place. They are generally solemn and re-
flective and intended as a peaceful way of honoring or highlighting a person or group of persons or a
subject of great concern.
March- A march is a gathering of people who move from one designated point to an agreed upon desti-
nation. Marches are good if you have a large crowd or when you want to cover a large area.
1. Pick a date (10/10 would be great!) and secure a location. Check to see if you need a permit or
some type of permission to hold your March or Vigil in public – it will be critical to know your rights re-
garding any type of public gathering. Pick a heavily populated route or public gathering point.
2. Decide on your cause and the message you want to send to those watching. Make it simple, peace-
ful and strong. Create banners, signs and handouts to use – be sure that all are focused on your mes-
sage, are strong but peaceful, spelled correctly and big enough for people to see.
3. Schedule speakers to address your crowd. You can schedule speakers to start your event, end
your event or both. Keep the speeches short and to the point, remember this is a demonstration not a
symposium.
4. Get the word out! Contact your advocates, friends, partners, etc - try to include as many groups as
possible to show the strength and solidarity within the community. Creating a unified coalition among
different groups (mental health groups and professionals, medical groups, families, patients, doctors,
nurses, etc) is essential to forming a broad-based social movement and getting the most attention.
5. Assign tasks and determine roles for all involved. If working with different groups – bring all lead-
ers together to utilize and unify everyone’s abilities, networks, and message.
6. Contact the media and write press releases announcing your plans – include your ‘who, what,
when, where’ information to be sure all facts about your demonstration are available.
7. Be sure to take pictures, keep notes of the full event and send all your information to wmhd2020@
wfmh.global when you are done – so we can show the world we are united and we won’t keep silent any
longer!
This could be the single largest advocacy effort for mental illness across the globe! We hope you will
join in and do anything you can to show your support. 5 people or 500 people – we can all make a dif-
ference if we just do something!
Effective Slogans
• Show the importance of an issue
• Show the relevance of an issue
• Put a “face” on the issue
• Address each specific audience
• Reflect an understanding of what would motivate change
• Are culturally relevant and sensitive
• Are memorable
Examples
• Mental Health Matters
• Move for Mental Health: let’s Invest!
• Celebrate World Mental Health Day – Open your Mind!
• Nothing about us without us
• March for Mental Health Reform!
• ALL illnesses deserve the same care and treatment!
• Close to 1 billion people are living with a mental disorder ... Look around you — do the math.”
• There is no health without mental health!
• Mental Discrimination: Open Your Eyes to Our Reality
WHEREAS, close to 1 billion people around the world are living mental disorder;
WHEREAS, relatively few people around the world have access to quality mental health care;
WHEREAS, the coronavirus pandemic has resulted in a deterioration in the mental health and well-being
of many people;
WHEREAS, mental illness such as anxiety disorders, depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizo-
phrenia, when not appropriately diagnosed and treated, are leading causes of poor work performance,
family disruption, and contribute greatly to the global burden of disease;
WHEREAS, many mental health conditions are treatable or preventable and the human toll they represent
have traditionally received too little attention and concern by the general public, the general healthcare
system, and elected and appointed public policy makers, resulting in inadequate priority being given to
these disorders;
AND WHEREAS, the World Federation for Mental Health has designated the theme for World Mental
Health Day 2020 as “Mental Health for All: Greater Investment, Greater Access,” and urges increased
investment in appropriate and equitable mental health services including support for the social determi-
nants of health to address mental health promotion and prevention;
and urge all governmental and nongovernmental mental health organizations and agencies to work in
concert with elected and appointed public officials to increase public awareness about, and acceptance
of, mental illnesses and the people living with these disorders; promote improved public policies to en-
hance diagnosis, treatment, and support services for those who need them through adopting a whole
systems approach; and to reduce the persistent stigma and discrimination that too often serve as barri-
ers for people seeking services and supports available to them.
I further urge all citizens to join and support the local, state/provincial, and national non-governmental
organizations that are working to make mental health a priority in communities throughout our nation.
Together, we will all make a difference and promote mentally healthy communities and citizens!
Signed________________________________________
Title _________________________________________
Ministry/Office/Agency _______________________________________
Date ________________________
(SEAL)
The Proclamation signing ceremony was organized by _____ (organizing organization or agency)
___________, and was attended by (members of the organization, public officials, community leaders,
and private citizens, etc.).
The Proclamation urged all non-governmental organizations and governmental agencies to work co-op-
eratively with elected and appointment public policy makers and officials to promote the enhancement
of equitable and appropriate mental health services in primary healthcare settings, and to increase ready
access to services by those experiencing serious mental health problems and disorders such as schizo-
phrenia, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, and depression! It also stressed the need for all members of
the community to increase their understanding of mental disorders and to help reduce the stigma and
discrimination that persists around mental illnesses and the people who live with these serious health
disorders.
The theme for World Mental Health Day 2020 is “Mental Health for All: Greater Investment, Greater Ac-
cess,” and addresses the need to promote early access to care and the prevention of mental health
difficulties and promotion of mental well-being.
The World Federation for Mental Health (WFMH) established World Mental Health Day in 1992; it is the
only annual global awareness campaign to focus attention on specific aspects of mental health and
mental disorders, and is now commemorated on all continents of the world and in nearly all countries
on October 10 through local, regional and national World Mental Health Day commemorative events and
programs.
The current COVID-19 pandemic has shown that our health systems are not well equipped to deal with
crises and emerging illnesses.
To support this year’s World Mental Health Day goal of providing greater access the World Federation
for Mental Health would like to provide direct support to some small NGO’s in low income countries who
have difficulty in obtaining the support required to continue the good work that they are doing.
We are calling on our supporters and members to help us to do this and have set up a virtual wall to
which you can make a donation.
All donors will be named on the 2020 World Mental Health Day Virtual Wall
Thanks
I would like to thank everybody who has contributed to World Mental Health Day 2020 ‘Mental Health for
All: Greater Investment – Greater Access,’ including this year’s Royal Patron HRH Princess Iman Afzan
Al-Sultan Abdullah and our WFMH President Ingrid Daniels.
The annual World Mental Health Day established in 1992 through the energies of Dick Hunter, and sup-
ported by the Carter Centre, has been actively supported by the WHO, United Nations and many individ-
uals, institutions and professional colleges around the world with an interest in promoting mental health
advocacy. I am very grateful to you all.
All our WFMH Secretary Generals and WFMH Past Presidents since 1992 have worked to ensure that
this annual event on October 10th continues to grow with a clear message to ensure that mental health
is a priority, and each of use receives the dignity of care that we are entitled to.
Every world citizen has a role to ensure that mental health is a global priority. I know that each of you is
playing a part – for this I am grateful.
WFMH cannot do this alone, and we welcome partnership and are grateful to all our volunteers. This
year’s educational material has been provided by people with lived experience, carers, health profession-
als from many specialities, governments and those who commission services. All our contributors have
volunteered their time and expertise to provide this years wonderful material – thank you.
Thanks to Pamela Collins and Deepa Rao for our World Mental Health Day Call to Action 2020. It should
not just be rhetoric – it requires us to act. I am very grateful to the 2020 WMHD technical team Mario
Merlo, Steve Maingot, and Ogheneochuko Okor, Master’s of Architecture Student at Columbia University,
New York, USA who provided the image for the front cover.
My thanks to the WFMH 2019-2021 Executive, Regional Vice Presidents and Board of Directors for their
support, and to WFMH voting and non-voting organisational members and WFMH individual members
for their support.
@WFMH_Official
@wfmhofficial
/World-Federation-for-Mental-Health-101568355012351