0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views

City Nonfarm Employment No

The document shows nonfarm employment numbers and counts by city and employment range. It provides totals for nonfarm employment and breaks it down by ranges of employment and the frequency of cities that fall within those ranges, with the largest number of cities (26) having nonfarm employment between 0-1250. It also calculates relative frequencies of the different employment ranges.

Uploaded by

P
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views

City Nonfarm Employment No

The document shows nonfarm employment numbers and counts by city and employment range. It provides totals for nonfarm employment and breaks it down by ranges of employment and the frequency of cities that fall within those ranges, with the largest number of cities (26) having nonfarm employment between 0-1250. It also calculates relative frequencies of the different employment ranges.

Uploaded by

P
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

City NonFarm employment NO.

NonFarm emploCount - City


Alabam
1639 0-1250 26
a
Alaska 235.5 1250-2500 14
Arizona 1510 2500-3750 5
Arkansa
951.1 3750-5000 3
sCaliforn
12324.3 5000-6250 2
ia
Colorad
1552.7 6250-7500 1
o
Connect
1510.6 7500-8750 1
icut
Delawar
District
335.2 8750-10000
e
of
667 10000-11250
Columbi
Florida 5322.8 11250-12500 1
a
Georgia 2927.1 <0
Hawaii 546.3 >12324.3
Idaho 400.4 Total Result 53
Illinois 5146.2
Indiana 2496.3
Iowa 1229.2 1000
Kansas 1108.3 2000
Kentuck
1474.8 3000
y
Louisian
1617.5 4000
a
Maine 500 5000
Marylan
2037.3 6000
d
Massach
2751.6 7000
usetts
Michiga
3828.9 8000
n
Minneso
2117.1 9000
ta
Mississi
940.9 10000
ppi
Missouri 2275.9 11000
Montan
299.3 12000
aNebrask
730.6 13000
a
Nevada
New 638.4
Hampsh 466.5
New
ire 3390.7 Answer C
Jersey
New
583.3 Answer E
Mexico
New
7666.4
York
North
3068.3
Carolina
North
271
Dakota
Ohio 4709.9
Oklaho
1196.9
ma
Oregon 1245.6
Pennsyl
4992.1
vania
Rhode
413.2
Island
South
1494.6
Carolina
South
295.6
Dakota
Tenness
2178.6
ee
Texas 7209.7
Utah 752.2
Vermon
244.8
t
Virginia 2792.4
Washin
2165.8
gton
West
622.1
Virginia
Wiscons
2272.1
in
Wyomin
198
g
Puerto
842.4
Rico
Virgin
42.4
Islands
NonFarm employment NO. Frequency Rel. Freq.
0-1250 26 0.49
1250-2500 14 0.26
2500-3750 5 0.09
3750-5000 3 0.06
5000-6250 2 0.04
6250-7500 1 0.02
7500-8750 1 0.02
8750-10000 0 0.00
10000-11250 0 0.00
11250-12500 1 0.02
Total 53 1.00

NonFarm employment NO. Cum.Frequency


<1000 22
<2000
Cum.Frequency-33
Ogive
60
<3000 43
<4000 46
50
<5000 48
<6000
40
50
<7000 50
<8000
30 52
<9000 52
20
<10000 52
<11000 52
10
<12000 52
<13000 53
0
<1000 <2000 <3000 <4000 <5000 <6000 <7000 <8000 <9000 <10000<11000<12000<13000

Discrete
43
60 72 126 110 91 115 112 A
80 66 101 75 93 129 105 b
113 121 93 87 119 111 97 C
102 116 114 107 113 119 100 D
110 99 139 108 128 84 99

Sr. No. Downtime


1 139
2 129
3 128
4 126 Histogram- Downtime
5 121 12
6 119
7 119 10
8 116
9 115 8

10 114
6
11 113
12 113 4
13 112
14 111 2
15 110
0
16 110 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 100-109 110-119 120-129 130-139
17 108
18 107
19 105
20 102
21 101
22 100
23 99
24 99
25 97
26 93
27 93
28 91
29 87
30 84
31 80
32 75
33 72
34 66
35 60
Sorted
Occurences whe 16
Done
Yes, Freq distribution shows that in most of the shifts, downtime is more than the average downtime and median downtime o

Downtime Count - Downtime Downtime Frequency Rel. Frequency


60-69 2 60-69 2 0.06
70-79 2 70-79 2 0.06
80-89 3 80-89 3 0.09
90-99 6 90-99 6 0.17
100-109 6 100-109 6 0.17
110-119 11 110-119 11 0.31
120-129 4 120-129 4 0.11
130-139 1 130-139 1 0.03
Total Result 35 Grand Total 35 1.00

Skewness -0.519710378569563
Mean 103.257142857143
Median 107
me and median downtime of the group
Miles per Gallon
4.77
6.11
6.11 Average 5.5325
5.05 Median 5.51
5.99 Modal Class 5.97-6.17
4.91 As there are no outliers in the data, Mean can be used for ordering fuel.
5.27
6.01
5.75
4.89
6.05
Count of Miles per Gallon
5.22
6.02 8
7
5.24 7
6.11 6
5.02 5
4
3 3
3
2
2
1
1
0
4.77-4.97 4.97-5.17 5.17-5.37 5.57-5.77 5.97-6.17
Miles per Gallon Count - Miles per Gallon
4.77-4.97 3
4.97-5.17 2
5.17-5.37 3
5.57-5.77 1
5.97-6.17 7
Total Result 16
or ordering fuel.
Fuel Consumption Count of Miles per Gallon
4.77-4.97 3
4.97-5.17 2
5.17-5.37 3
5.57-5.77 1
5.97-6.17 7
Grand Total 16
Design
A B C
16 18 31
16 27 16
53 23 42
15 21 20
31 22 18
17 26 17
14 39 16
30 17 15
20 28 19
Average 23.55556 24.55556 21.55556
Median 17 23 18

Best Design is B as both average life and median life are better
Change in Price Number of L Companies Number of R Companies Lower Limit

-1.25 to -1.01 1 1 -1.25


-1.00 to -0.76 1 1 -1.00
-0.75 to -0.51 1 0 -0.75
-0.50 to -0.26 7 5 -0.50
-0.25 to -0.01 19 20 -0.25
0 14 20 0.00
0.01 to 0.25 21 14 0.01
0.26 to 0.50 5 8 0.26
0.51 to 0.75 3 1 0.51
0.76 to 1.00 2 4 0.76
1.01 to 1.25 1 0 1.01

75 74
Upper limit midpoint Sum for L Sum for R L(M-mean)R(M-mean)L(M-mean)^2*F

-1.01 -1.13 -1.13 -1.13 -1.152 -1.164 1.327

-0.76 -0.88 -0.88 -0.88 -0.902 -0.914 0.813

-0.51 -0.63 -0.63 0 -0.652 -0.664 0.425

-0.26 -0.38 -2.66 -1.9 -0.402 -0.414 1.130

-0.01 -0.13 -2.47 -2.6 -0.152 -0.164 0.438

0 0.00 0 0 -0.022 -0.034 0.007

0.25 0.13 2.73 1.82 0.108 0.096 0.246

0.5 0.38 1.9 3.04 0.358 0.346 0.641

0.75 0.63 1.89 0.63 0.608 0.596 1.109

1 0.88 1.76 3.52 0.858 0.846 1.473

1.25 1.13 1.13 0 1.108 1.096 1.228

Total 1.64 2.5 8.83753866666667

Mean 0.0219 0.034

Median Group -0.25 to 0.01 0

Median -0.0982 0.125

Std. Deviation 0.343269353262 0.327008

CoV 15.698293594297 9.679441


R(M-mean)^2

1.354

0.835

0.000

0.856

0.537

0.023

0.130

0.959

0.355

2.864

0.000

7.91314054054054
a PUMP A , As overall failure probability is .11 as compared to Pump B's 0.13
b Yes, I should move to pump B, provided new gasket doesn’t create new failures
Insufficient Funds 12% 120
Cashback+ Insufficient funds 6% 60
Cashback 10% 100
Cashback Or Insufficient funds 16% 160
Shareholder ROE E/A Total Assets
Rank Holding Company (%) $0
(%)
1 United Community Bancorp 27.2 5.61 157,492
2 Illinois Financial Services 25.16 6.72 306,048
3 FBOP Corp. 24.44 6.39 560,770
4 Alpine Bancorp, Inc. 24.12 7.18 170,382
5 River Forest Bancorp, Inc. 20.92 4.42 1,313,797
6 Pinnacle Banc Group Inc. 18.81 8.58 728,167
7 FNBC of La Grange Inc. 18.68 8.92 180,671
8 First Park Ridge Corp. 17.72 9.91 314,145
9 Palmer Bancorp Inc. 17.01 8.61 225,016
10 Northern Trust Corp. 16.66 5.83 13,154,522
11 West Suburban Bancorp 16.02 7.58 1,005,485
12 Parkway Bancorp Inc. 15.93 7.51 550,559
13 First Evergreen Corp. 15.7 7.39 1,583,884
14 LaSalle Community Bancorporation Inc. 15.3 7.08 2,814,118
15 Premier Financial Services 15.01 6.95 369,503
16 Riverdale Bancorp 14.95 5.28 221,426
17 Town & Country Bancorp Inc. 14.9 4.3 133,000

18 Standard Bancshares Inc. 14.83 8.87 426,025

19 Heritage Financial Services 14.35 7.57 738,726


20 National Bancorp Inc. 14.25 5.58 275,856
21 Firstbank of Illinois Co. 13.94 6.32 1,494,060
22 Banterra Corp. 13.77 6.91 393,158
23 Northern Illinois Financial Corp. 13.67 8.46 784,260
24 Heartland Bancorp Inc. 13.52 8.69 159,767
25 Sandwich Banco Inc. 13.51 6.6 308,290
Net Income
$0 A ROE(>16%)
B E/A(<7%)
1
1,784 A&B
3,846 P(A|B)
7,780
2,248
20,339 A ROE(<14%, >16%)
10,328 B E/A(>7%)
2
2,459 A&B
5,025 P(A|B)
3,462
132,246 4A ROE(>15%)
11,940
6,716 5A Total Assets (>2Billion) & ROE(>15)
17,187 A ROE(>20%)
27,144 6 (Assuming conditional B Total Assets (>1Billion)
probability)
3,908 A&B ROE(>20%) & Total Assets (>Billion)
2,039 P(A|B)
Not available
6 (Assuming no condition
5,267 B/w ROE and Total A ROE(>20%)
Assets)
8,200
2,863 A Net Income (>50 million)
14,906 B Total Asset (>2 Billion)
3
3,461 A&B Net Income (>50 million) Total Asset (>2 Billion)
8,658 P(A|B)
1,704
2,892
11 0.44 P(A)
12 0.48 P(B)
5 0.2 P(A&B)
0.416667

9 0.36 P(A)
13 0.52 P(B)
5 0.2 P(A&B)
0.384615

15 0.6

2 0.08
5 0.2 P(A)
6 0.24 P(B)
1 0.04 P(A&B)
0.166667

5 0.2 P(A)

1 0.04 P(A)
2 0.08 P(B)
1 0.04 P(A&B)
0.5

You might also like