Lectures Composite
Lectures Composite
Core:
Expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) Polyisocyanurate foam
Extruded polystyrene foam (XPS) Polyurethane foam
Composite honeycomb (HSC)
Flexible
Easy to handle
Durable
Dirt
Light weight
Rigidity
Reliable robust mechanical performance
Thermal, fire and sound insulation.
Air tightness
Strong and durability
Low maintenance / cleaning requirements.
Low capital cost and low lifetime costs
Chemical and biological resistance
Weather resistance.
Dimensional stability.
Foam includes Relatively low crush strength and Excellent crush strength and
polyvinyl chloride stiffness Increasing stress with stiffness
polymethacrylimide increasing strain Friable Limited Constant crush strength
polyurethane strength Fatigue Cannot be Structural integrity Exceptionally
polystyrene formed around curvatures high strengths available
phenolic High fatigue resistance
polyethersulfone
Wood-based includes
plywood Very heavy density Excellent strength-to-weight ratio
balsa Subject to moisture degradation Excellent moisture resistance
particleboard Flammable Self-extinguishing, low smoke
versions available
Manufacturing of Sandwich Structure
Sandwich Panel construction processing methods
Autoclave Vacuum bag Press
Heat pressing
Single shot process.
Suitable for metallic
Prepreg facing skin materials may be pre-cured by using a
press
Vacuum Bag
Vacuum Bag Processing, used for curved and complex form
panels.
The component should be assembled for cure as a single shot
process, the necessary consolidation is obtained using a
vacuum. This can be cured in an oven, and additional
pressure can be applied if an autoclave is used.
This method is suitable for items with prepreg or metallic
facing skins. When flexible honeycomb core and film
adhesives are used complex items may be produced.
Autoclave Processing
Mature and standardized method for composites manufacturing
Controlled thermal Program, high pressure environment
High fiber volume fraction, low void content hence,
maximum strength
Largest autoclave size (30’ x 76’)
expected to be 20% more fuel efficient than Al jets with
multiple other attributes