Recycling of Finished Leather Wastes: A Novel Approach
Recycling of Finished Leather Wastes: A Novel Approach
DOI 10.1007/s10098-014-0776-x
ORIGINAL PAPER
Received: 6 February 2014 / Accepted: 2 May 2014 / Published online: 16 May 2014
Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
123
188 R. Senthil et al.
123
Recycling of finished leather wastes 189
was used to convert them into smooth and short fibers. PF resolution of 4 cm-1 in the frequency range of
was prepared using the pulverizer machine. The average 4,000–500 cm-1 using Nicolet 360 FTIR Spectrometer.
fiber size ranged between 1.5 and 2.5 cm in length and Thermo gravimetric analysis was performed using High
0.2–0.7 mm in width (Fig. 1b, e) (Satyanarayana et al. Resolution 2950 TGA thermo gravimetric analyzer (TA
1990). Instrument). Samples weighing between 10 and 20 mg
were placed in a platinum pan and test was carried out in a
Characterization of LF and PF programmed temperature range of 0–800 °C at a heating
rate of 5 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere at flow rate of
LF and PF were characterized for their mechanical prop- 50 ml/min. Surface morphology of the samples was visu-
erties and surface morphology. Mechanical properties such alized by scanning electron microscope (SEM Model LE-
as tensile strength (MPa) and percentage of elongation at ICA stereo scan 440).
break were measured using Universal testing machine
(INSTRON model 1405) at an extension rate of 5 mm/min. Mechanical properties
Scanning electron microscopic analysis was carried out on
Model LEICA stereo scan 440 instrument. The samples Mechanical properties were assessed using three dumbbell-
were coated with gold ions using an ion coating unit. The shaped specimens of 4 mm wide and 10 mm length. Ten-
micrographs for LF and PF were taken at different mag- sile strength (MPa), elongation at break (%) and tearing
nifications by operating the instrument at 15kv accelerating strength (N/mm) were measured using Universal testing
voltage. machine (INSTRON model 1405) at an extension rate of
5 mm/min. Flexing endurance strength was also assessed
Preparation of regenerated leather (RGL) using fiber board flexing (TER 74) machine according to
STM 129 test method. Water absorption and desorption
Fiberized materials (400 g) were soaked in water over- (%) capacities of different RLCs prepared were determined
night. Later, they were minced using mincer (La Minerva according to Sekar et al. (2007).
C/E 680N). The minced samples were collected and ground
in industrial mixer for 15 min by adding 400 ml of natural Statistical analysis
rubber latex, and pH was adjusted to 5. Finally, 5 ml of
ethylene glycol was added and mixed thoroughly and cast Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD)
into sheets of three individual experiments (n = 3). ANOVA (analysis
of variance) and Duncan’s multiple range analysis were
Casting done to determine the significant differences among the
groups. p values of p \ 0.05 were considered significant.
The prepared slurry was poured into vacuum tub (size
3 9 2 feet) and water was drained completely. The wet
sheet formed was pressed for 10 s at 1,000 psi using Results and discussion
hydraulic press (Polyhydron, 4DL10SG S-10) to remove
additional water. The prepared board was dried in sunlight The growing interest on PFs is mainly due to their abun-
for 8 h and further pressed at 40 °C for 10 s at 1,500 psi. dant availability, cost-effectiveness and low specific
weight, which results in composites with higher strength.
Preparation of regenerated leather composite (RLC) This study is a maiden attempt to use natural PFs as rein-
forcement for RGL. Use of PFs has improved the green
To the prepared RGL slurry, PFs were added individually credentials of RLCs due to nil polymer use (Wolcott and
in various proportions and mixed uniformly using an Englund 1999). Composites prepared from leather and
industrial mixer. Leather boards prepared using viz., CTF, agriculture wastes possessed better properties, which could
sugar cane bagasse (SNF), BAF and corn silk (CNF) was be used for the manufacture of footwear, leather goods, etc.
designated as LF:CTF, LF:SNF, LF:BAF and LF:CNF,
respectively. Characterization of LF and PF
Characterization of RGL and RLCs The mechanical properties of LF and PFs viz., CTF, SNF,
BAF and CNF are given in Table 1. Collagen constitutes
Fourier transform infrared measurements were carried out the major portion of LF, whereas cellulose, hemicelluloses
to determine the formation and changes in the functional and lignin constitutes the major portion of PFs. Due to the
groups of RGL and RLCs. The spectra were measured at a natural alignment of the carbon–carbon bonds within the
123
190 R. Senthil et al.
structure of the PFs, it is expected that their linear chained Composites prepared using LFs and PFs are shown in
polymers would possess significant strength and stiffness Fig. 4a–d and their corresponding surface finished boards
(Justiz-Smith et al. 2008). Among the PFs, CTF possessed are given in Fig. 4e–h. The composite boards had a smooth
high values of tensile strength and elongation at break %, surface and they were light weight in nature.
while CNF being the least. Lignin provides plant tissue and
individual cells with compressive strength and also stiffens Characterization of RGL and RLCs
the cell wall of the fiber. The presence of high amount of
lignin contributes to increased tensile strength (Sun et al. The FTIR spectra (Fig. 5) of all the products show the
2004). Justiz-Smith et al. (2008) have already reported that characteristic peak of latex 1,370–1,380 cm-1, which is
CTF had the highest lignin content of 59.4 % while attributed to phenolic stretch vibration of OH and aliphatic
bagasse and banana had 13 and 9 %, respectively. Hence, –CH–OH deformation in methyl groups of rubber latex.
the presence of high amount of lignin contributes to Since the raw material used for the preparation of RCL is
increased tensile strength of CTF, followed by SNF and from plant source, the spectrum (Fig. 5b–e) shows the
BNF. The microstructure of the PF and LF were revealed characteristic peaks of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin.
by SEM (Fig. 2a, e). The natural fibers presented similar The absorption bands at 1,039–1,164 cm-1 can be attrib-
morphology, while the differences among the various PF uted mainly to the carbohydrates (cellulose and lignin),
types are the number of fiber-cells, the cell wall size, the including C–O–C and C–O stretch (primary and secondary
number of lumens, fiber cross-section area, etc. Therefore, hydroxide groups) and bonds belonging to the glucoside
each fiber presents different characteristics and mechanical linkage and possibly to lignin. The bands in the region of
behavior (Fidelis et al. 2013). 1,700 cm-1 can be attributed to unconjugated CO
Fig. 2 Scanning electron microscopic images of LFs and PFs a LF, b CTF, c SNF, d BAF, e CNF
123
Recycling of finished leather wastes 191
Mechanical properties
123
192 R. Senthil et al.
LF:CTF (50:40 ratio) possessed significantly (p \ 0.05) effects on their mechanical properties and dimensional
higher tensile strength (5.88 MPa) compared to RGL and stability. Among the PFs used, SNF has increased the water
other ratios of LF:CRF. An increase in tensile strength was absorption capacity of the composites, which might be due
observed with increase in ratio of CTF. Similar trend was to its hydrophilic nature (Bhardwaj et al. 2006). Most of all
exhibited by SNF and BAF (Ku et al. 2011), while there PFs are hydrophilic in nature with a moisture content of
was no increase in tensile strength due to the incorporation 8–13 % due to the presence of cellulose in cell structure
of CNF. Rowell et al. (1997) reported that the increase in (Venkateshwaran and ElayaPerumal 2010). Justiz-Smith
tensile strength of the composites could be attributed to the et al. (2008) has also reported that water absorption by SNF
cellulose content of PFs, hence there was increase in tensile (235 %) is higher compared to CTF (169 %) and BAF
strength due to the incorporation of PFs viz., CTF, SNF and (40 %). Water absorption and desorption capacity of a
BNF. Since corn silk contains very negligible amount of composite material play a major role in deciding its use in
cellulose (Rosli et al. 2008), it could not contribute much footwear and leather goods manufacture. Since, maintain-
towards tensile strength. Also, it could be observed that ing a dry product surface is essential to prevent slipperiness
addition of PFs to RGL has produced a synergistic effect in and microbial growth. Among the RLCs, LF:CTF (50:40)
tensile strength. displayed significantly increased water desorption values
Elongation at break % (E) reveals the elasticity of the compared to RGL, which could be attributed to the pre-
composite. LF:CTF (50:40 ratio) exhibited significantly sence of high content of lignin in CTF (Geethama et al.
(p \ 0.05) higher elongation at break percentage compared 1995; Persico et al. 2011).
to RGL and other RLCs. Nevertheless, increase in the ratio Ethylene glycol was used to increase the flexibility of
of PFs viz., CTF, SNF and BNF, have increased the the composite material. Among the composites, LF:CTF
elongation at break percentage of RLCs compared to RGL. and LF:BAF have displayed significant increase in flexi-
An increase in tearing strength was observed with increase bility, compared to RGL. With increase in PF content,
in the ratio of all PFs, among which CTF (50:40 ratio) has there was an increase in flexural strength which could be
displayed the higher value. caused by the bridging formed in between them. Com-
The amount of water absorbed is an important factor in paratively better flexural strength in RLCs could suggest
composites characterization, since it can have undesired that there is a considerable interfacial interaction in
Fig. 5 FTIR analysis of a RGL and RLCs prepared using b CTF, c SNF, d BAF, e CNF
123
Recycling of finished leather wastes 193
Fig. 6 TGA analysis of a RGL and RLCs prepared using b CTF, c SNF, d BAF, e CNF
123
194 R. Senthil et al.
Fig. 7 Scanning electron microscopic images of a RGL and RLCs prepared using b CTF, c SNF, d BAF, e CNF
between the PFs and RGL matrix, and, at the same time, enormous amount of water is used, which causes envi-
fiber entanglements act as resistant junction points against ronmental pollution. This water has to be treated as per the
deflection forces (Persico et al. 2011). regulations before it is discharged out. But, during the
According to Dodwell (1989), fashion and comfort production of RGL, much less water is used thereby
footwear could be made from leather boards with tensile reducing the water treatment cost considerably and also the
strength of 5.5 N/mm2, while inexpensive and light foot entire production is eco-friendly.
wears could be made from leather boards with tensile
strength of 4.0 N/mm2 and the water absorption and
desorption (%) should be minimum of 35 and 40 %, Conclusion
respectively. Hence, from the results of mechanical prop-
erties, it could be inferred that the RLCs prepared using Production of RGL from leather wastes and used leather
CTF could be used for the preparation of fashion and goods is an efficient way of recycling leather products.
comfort footwear, while those prepared using SNF and Since, RGL prepared from leather wastes did not have
BNF could be used for preparation of light leather goods enough mechanical strength, the study aimed to increase its
items. strength by incorporation of PFs. Four PFs viz., coconut,
The study deciphers a viable technology to produce sugarcane, banana and corn were selected for the study.
recycled/RGL from used leather products. Natural PFs Composites fabricated using these PFs possessed enhanced
were incorporated in RGL, because they provide stiffness mechanical properties. Among the prepared composites
and strength to the composites and unlike brittle fibers such prepared, LF:CTF (50:40 ratio) exhibited significant values
as glass, biofibers will not be fractured when processing in terms of tensile strength, elongation at break, tearing
over sharp curvatures (Eichhorn et al. 2001). RLCs pre- strength, water desorption and flexibility. These smooth
pared possess better mechanical properties and offer twin surfaced composites find potential applications not only in
advantages of cost-effectiveness and pollution control. footwear and leather goods industry but also it could be
Leather boards prepared using regular method cost Rs. exploited for other purposes such as roofing, wall partitions
50/Sq feet, while leather boards prepared using this RGL and components of furniture. The study also envisions the
cost Rs. 25/Sq feet. Hence, there is 50 % reduction in the production of cost-effective composites, by conversion of
cost of leather board production. During the production of wastes into wealth and thereby simultaneously decreasing
leather boards using regular methods (Ferguson 1983), the environmental pollution.
123
Table 2 Mechanical properties of RGL and regenerated leather composite prepared using CTF
S.no. Composition Tensile Elongation at Tearing strength Water Water Flexing index Thickness
(%) LF:CTF strength(Mpa) break (%) (N/mm) absorption (%) desorption (%) (mm)
Along Across
1 50:0 (RGL) 3.41 ± 0.18 3.06 ± 0.12 13.76 ± 0.64 38.88 ± 0.68 50.3 ± 0.60 1.13 ± 0.20 1.24 ± 0.04 0.58
2 50:40 5.88 ± 0.09* 5.62 ± 0.07* 28.69 ± 1.06* 58.43 ± 1.32* 62.66 ± 0.97* 2.13 ± 0.15* 2.3 ± 0.2* 0.58
Recycling of finished leather wastes
3 50:30 5.53 ± 0.09* 5.39 ± 0.07* 26.133 ± 0.4* 48.77 ± 1.3* 55.6 ± 1.21* 1.91 ± 0.04* 1.9 ± 0.05* 0.57
4 50:20 5.2 ± 0.09* 5.26 ± 0.15* 25.6 ± 1.2* 48.7 ± 0.6* 47.26 ± .64* 1.81 ± 0.07* 1.85 ± 0.05* 0.89
5 50:10 5 ± 0.2* 5.09 ± .11* 25.33 ± 0.66* 39.36 ± 1.1 43.66 ± 2.08* 1.7 ± 0.05* 1.61 ± 0.07* 0.70
The data are presented as mean ± SD of three individual experiments
* p \ 0.05 as compared to RGL, using Duncan’s multiple range analysis
Table 3 Mechanical properties of regenerated leather (RGL) and regenerated leather composite prepared using SNF
S.No. Composition Tensile Elongation at Tearing Water Water Flexing index Thickness
(%) LF:SNF strength (Mpa) break (%) strength (N/mm) absorption (%) desorption (%) (m/m)
Along Across
1 50:0 (RGL) 3.41 ± 0.18 3.06 ± 0.12 13.76 ± 0.64 38.88 ± 0.68 50.3 ± 0.60 1.13 ± 0.20 1.24 ± 0.04 0.58
2 50:40 5.09 ± 0.13* 5.2 ± 0.09* 21.9 ± 0.98* 62 ± 0.75 47.7 ± 0.8 1.42 ± 0.9* 1.27 ± 0.05 0.55
3 50:30 4.82 ± 0.07* 4.7 ± 0.24* 20.75 ± 0.916* 59.56 ± 0.97* 60.1 ± 2.53* 1.19 ± 0.08 1.14 ± 0.07 0.54
4 50:20 4.7 ± 0.04* 4.39 ± 0.34* 19.4 ± 0.64* 51.1 ± 0.81* 48.7 ± 1.2 1.63 ± 0.07* 1.97 ± 0.67* 0.88
5 50:10 4.05 ± 0.15* 3.84 ± 0.09* 19 ± 0.36* 39.4 ± 1.44* 54.4 ± 2.35* 1.55 ± 0.08* 1.77 ± 0.02* 0.90
The data are presented as mean ± SD of three individual experiments
* p \ 0.05 as compared to RGL, using Duncan’s multiple range analysis
195
123
196
123
Table 4 Mechanical properties of regenerated leather (RGL) and regenerated leather composite prepared using BAF
S.No. Composition Tensile Elongation Tearing Water Water Flexing index Thickness
(%) LF:BAF strength (Mpa) at break (%) strength (N/ absorption (%) desorption (%) (m/m)
mm) Along Across
1 50:0 (RGL) 3.41 ± 0.18 3.06 ± 0.12 13.76 ± 0.64 38.88 ± 0.68 50.3 ± 0.60 1.13 ± 0.20 1.24 ± 0.04 0.58
2 50:40 4.19 ± 0.27* 3.94 ± 0.07* 18.26 ± 0.55* 52.46 ± 1.64* 52.4 ± 1.44 1.58 ± 0.05* 1.74 ± 0.09* 0.90
3 50:30 3.8 ± 0.05* 3.81 ± 0.06* 17.9 ± 0.55* 60.9 ± 1.2* 53.9 ± 1.34* 1.443 ± 0.31 1.54 ± 0.1* 0.54
4 50:20 3.71 ± 0.07* 3.51 ± 0.07* 17.23 ± 0.68* 47.12 ± 1.09* 54.5 ± 1.1* 1.44 ± 0.31 1.34 ± 0.09 0.55
5 50:10 3.54 ± 0.08 3.66 ± 0.17* 17.8 ± 0.26* 46.56 ± 0.66* 55 ± 2.27* 1.72 ± 0.06* 1.44 ± 0.08* 0.98
The data are presented as mean ± SD of three individual experiments
* p \ 0.05 as compared to RGL, using Duncan’s multiple range analysis
Table 5 Mechanical properties of regenerated leather (RGL) and regenerated leather composite prepared using CNF
S.No. Composition Tensile Elongation Tearing Water Water Flexing index Thickness
(%) LF:CNF strength (Mpa) at break (%) strength (N/mm) absorption (%) desorption (%) (m/m)
Along Across
1 50:0 (RGL) 3.41 ± 0.18 3.06 ± 0.12 13.76 ± 0.64 38.88 ± 0.68 50.3 ± 0.60 1.13 ± 0.20 1.24 ± 0.04 0.58
2 50:40 3.72 ± 0.25 3.55 ± 0.06* 17.8 ± 0.75* 49.6 ± 1.07* 31.4 ± 0.88* 1.46 ± 0.08* 1.15 ± 0.08 0.59
3 50:30 3.58 ± 0.18 3.46 ± 0.11 16.5 ± 0.75* 47.7 ± 0.66* 55.05 ± 1.35* 1.67 ± 0.06* 1.28 ± 0.14 0.54
4 50:20 3.41 ± 0.03 3.42 ± 0.40 16.9 ± 0.55* 42.5 ± 1.1* 39.6 ± 1.1* 1.17 ± 0.14 1.56 ± 0.09* 0.55
5 50:10 3 ± 0.15* 3.2 ± 0.2 15.2 ± 0.4* 47.3 ± 1.45* 44.6 ± 1* 1.15 ± 0.18 1.78 ± 0.1* 0.98
The data are presented as mean ± SD of three individual experiments
* p \ 0.05 as compared to RGL, using Duncan’s multiple range analysis
R. Senthil et al.
Recycling of finished leather wastes 197
Acknowledgments The award of STRAIT fellowship to R. Senthil Ku H, Wang H, Parrarachaiyokoop N, Trada M (2011) A review on
and CSIR-fellowship to T. Hemalatha is gratefully acknowledged. the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer
composites. Compos Part B Eng 42:856–873
Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of Lopattananon N, Panawarangkul K, Sahakaro K, Ellis B (2006)
interest. Performance of pineapple leaf fiber–natural rubber composites:
the effect of fiber surface treatments. J Appl Polym Sci
102:1974–1984
McDougall GJ, Morrison IM, Stewart D, Weyers JDB, Hillman JR
References (1993) Plant fibres: botany, chemistry and processing for
industrial use. J Sci Food Agric 62:1–20
Ozgunay H, Colak S, Mutlu MM, Akyuz F (2007) Characterization of
Abdullah NM, Ahmad I (2013) Fire-retardant polyester composites
leather industry waste. Pol J Environ Stud 6:867–873
from recycled polyethylene terephthalate (pet) wastes reinforced
Pelissari FM, Andrade-mahecha MM, Amaral Sobral PJ, Menegalli F
with coconut fibre. Sains Malaysiana 42:811–818
(2013) Comparative study on the properties of flour and starch
Ahmed K, Nizami SS, Raza NZ, Mahmood K (2012) Mechanical,
films of plantain bananas (Musa paradisiaca). Food Hydrocol-
swelling, and thermal aging properties of marble sludge-natural
loid 30:681–690
rubber composites. Int J Ind Chem 3:21
Persico P, Acierno D, Carfagna C, Cimino F (2011) Mechanical and
Assamoi B, Lawryshyn Y (2012) The environmental comparison of
thermal behaviour of ecofriendly composites reinforced by
land filling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste
Kenaf and Caroà fibers. Int J Polym Sci. doi:10.1155/2011/
diversion. Waste Manag 32:1019–1030
841812
Bhardwaj R, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Pourboghrat F, Misra M (2006)
Reddy N, Yang Y (2004) Biofibers from agricultural by products for
Renewable resource-based green composites from recycled
industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol 23:22–27
cellulose fiber and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvale-
Rosli W, Nurhanan WI, Mohsin AR, Farid SSJ, Ghazali C (2008)
rate) bioplastic. Biomacromolecules 7:2044–2051
Aqueous, alcoholic treated and proximate analysis of Maydis
Brigida AIS, Calado VMA, Goncalves LRB, Coelho MAZ (2010)
stigma (Zea mays Hairs). Ann Microsc 8:66–72
Effect of chemical treatments on properties on green coconut
Rowell RM, Sanadi AR, Caulfield DF, Jacobson RE (1997) Utiliza-
fibre. Carbohydr Polym 79:832–838
tion of natural fibers in plastic composites: problems and
Dodwell G (1989) Components—guidelines and characteristics.
opportunities. In: Leao AL, Carvalho FX, Frollini E (eds)
SATRA Bull 208–209
Lignocellulosic-Plastic composites, University of Rio de Janeiro,
Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N, Mwaikambo LY, Ansell
USP and UNESP, Rio de Janeiro, pp 23–51
MP, Dufresne A, Entwistle KM, Herrera-Franceo PJ, Escamilla
Rowell RM, Han JS, Rowell JS (2000) Characterization and factors
GC, Leslie GH, Hughers M, Hill C, Timothy RG, Wild PM
affecting fiber properties. In: Frollini E, Leao AL, Mattoso LHC
(2001) Current international research into cellulosic fibres and
(eds) Natural polymers and Agro fibers composites. USP/UNESP
composites. J Mater Sci 36:2107–2131
and Embrapa, Sao Carlos ISBN: 85-86463-06-X:115-134
Ferguson D (1983) The manufacture of leather board. J Soc Leather
Sastry TP, Sehgal RK, Ramasamy T (2005) Value added eco-friendly
Technol Chem 68:178–179
products from tannery solid wastes. J Environ Sci Eng 4:250–255
Fidelis MEA, Pereira TVC, Gomes ODFM, Silva FDN, Filho RDT
Satyanarayana KG, Sukumaran K, Mukherjee PS, Pavithran C, Pillai
(2013) The effect of fiber morphology on the tensile strength of
SGK (1990) Natural fiber–polymer composites. Cem Concr
natural fibers. J Mater Res Technol 2:149–157
Comp 2:117–136
Flandez J, Gonzalez I, Resplandis JB, EI Mansouri NE, Vilaseca F,
Saxena M, Morchhale RK, Asokan P, Prasad BK (2008) Plant fiber—
Mutje P (2012) Management of corn stalk waste as reinforce-
industrial waste reinforced polymer composites as a potential
ment for polypropylene injection moulded composites. BioRe-
wood substitute material. J Compos Mater 42:367–384
sources 7:1836–1849
Seggiani M, Puccini M, Vitolo S, Chiappe C, pomeli CS, Castiello D
Geethama VG, Reethama J, Thomas S (1995) Short coir fiber
(2014) Eco-friendly titanium tanning for the manufacture of
reinforced natural rubber composites: effect of fiber length,
bovine upper leathers: pilot scale studies. Clean Technol Environ
orientation and alkali treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 55:583–594
Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0722-y
Goncalves AR, Esposito E, Benar P (1998) Evaluation of Panus
Sekar S, Mohan R, Ramasastry M, Das BN, Sastry TP (2007)
tigrinus in the delignification of sugarcane bagasse by FTIR-
Preparation and particle characterization of composite boards
PCA and pulp properties. J Biotechnol 66:177–185
using chrome shavings and various binders. Leather Age 19:86–92
Justiz-Smith NG, Virgo GJ, Buchanan VE (2008) Potential of
Suddell BC, Evans WJ (2005) Natural fibre composites in automotive
Jamaican banana, coir, bagasse fiber as composite materials.
applications. In: Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (eds) Natural
Mater Charact 59:1273–1278
fibres, biopolymers and biocomposites. CRC, Boca Raton,
Kalia S, Thakur K, Celli A, Kiechel MA, Schauer CL (2013) Surface
pp 37–71
modification of plant fibers using environment friendly methods
Sun J, Sun X, Zhao H, Sun R (2004) Isolation and characterization of
for their application in polymer composites, textile industry and
cellulose from sugarcane bagasse. Polym Degrad Stab J
antimicrobial activities: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 1:97–112
84:331–339
Kamboj S, Rana V (2014) Physicochemical, rheological and antiox-
Venkateshwaran N, ElayaPerumal A (2010) Natural fiber composite
idant potential of corn fiber gum. Food Hydrocolloid 39:1–9
in automotive applications—a review. Int J Prot Manag Technol
Kanagaraj J, Velappan KC, Chandrababu NK, Sadulla S (2006) Solid
Res 1:19–24
waste generation in the leather industries and its utilization for
Wolcott M, Englund K (1999). A technology review of wood plastic
cleaner environment—an review. J Sci Ind Res 65:541–548
composites. In: 33rd international particleboard/composite mate-
Karthik T, Murugan R (2013) Characterization and analysis of ligno-
rials symposium, Washington State University, Pullman
cellulosic seed fiber from Pergularia daemia plant for textile
Zhang Z, Li G, Shi B (2006) Physicochemical properties of collagen,
applications. Fiber Polym 14:465–472
gelatine and collagen hydrolysate derived from bovine limed
Khan GMA, Alam MS, Terano M (2012) Thermal characterization of
split wastes. JSLTC 90:23–28
chemically treated coconut husk fibre. IJFTR 37:20–26
123