Thickener Experiences at Langer Heinrich Mine
Thickener Experiences at Langer Heinrich Mine
Paterson (eds)
© 2012 Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, ISBN 978-0-9806154-9-4
doi:10.36487/ACG_rep/1263_13_Cooks
Abstract
Langer Heinrich Mine (LHM) reports on the operational experiences of thickeners supplied by several
vendors. Modifications that were made to mitigate challenges presented by the thickener operation are
discussed.
The in-house modifications to the Lightnin® thickener improved capacity, reliability and performance, and
the modifications of which, are ongoing. The ANDRITZ Delkor (Pty) Ltd thickener modifications were
successful and the thickeners are performing to specification. Indications are that the Roymec Technologies
(Pty) Ltd thickeners will perform to specification. The Magra Ultrasep 2000 High Performance Thickener is
still in the commissioning phase at the time of writing.
1 Introduction
Langer Heinrich Mine is part of the Paladin Energy Group. The mine is located in Namibia some 80 km east
of the town of Swakopmund. The orebody is located in the Namib-Naukluft National Park in the Namib
Desert. This location presents unique challenges.
The project is being developed in stages. Stage 1 was commissioned in 2006, Stage 2 followed in 2009, and
Stage 3 is currently in the commissioning and ramp-up phase.
Nine 25 m Lightnin thickeners and clarifiers were installed as part of Stage 1. The thickener functions were
the following: one pre-leach thickener, six CCD thickeners, one clarifier, and one ‘vanadium’ thickener. The
‘vanadium’ thickener was converted to a clarifier during the ramp-up of Stage 1.
Stage 2 development required an additional four 35 m thickeners. The 25 m Lightnin pre-leach thickener
was replaced by a 35 m thickener, a 35 m thickener was installed as the CCD 1 thickener and two 35 m
thickeners were installed as CCD 5 and CCD 6. These 35 m thickeners were supplied by ANDRITZ Delkor
(Pty) Ltd. The Lightnin thickener configuration was changed to run as three sets of two parallel thickeners
and performed duty as CCD 2 A & B, CCD 3 A & B and CCD 4 A & B. The 25 m Lightnin pre-leach thickener
functioned as a standby pre-leach unit.
Stage 3 upgrade required an additional two 35 m CCD thickeners; CCD 4 and CCD 7. These 35 m units were
supplied by Roymec Technologies (Pty) Ltd. This necessitated a change in configuration of the Lightnin CCD
thickeners. The Stage 3 configuration is comprised of two sets of three parallel thickeners; CCD 2 A, B & C
and CCD 3 A, B & C.
The chosen tailings deposition for the Stage 3 upgrade is a paste system comprising of a 12 m Magra
Ultrasep 2000 High Performance Thickener, supplied by Magra Process Engineering (MPE), as the paste
thickener, the pumping system designed by Paterson & Cooke (P&C) and a tailings storage facility (TSF)
designed by Metago Environmental Engineers.
A fourth stage expansion is currently in the bankable feasibility study (BFS) stage.
The continuous expansion and upgrading of LHM caused significant changes in the duty of the thickeners.
The increased duty comparison is given in Table 1.
This change in duty and the availability of the 25 m Lightnin pre-leach thickener provided the opportunity
to make changes and upgrades to the thickener and the thickener control without influencing the
production significantly. The goal of the 25 m Lightnin pre-leach thickener design changes was to increase
the thickener’s operational capacity to a full pre-leach standby unit. The standby unit had to be capable of
handling Stage 2 tonnages reliably. A stretched goal of Stage 3 tonnages was set.
This paper will focus mainly on the upgrading of the pre-leach thickener with brief discussions of the
ANDRITZ Delkor thickener changes and commissioning experiences of the Roymec thickeners and Magra
UltraSep thickener.
mitigate some of the drag created by the picket addition, a plate was attached on the ‘downstream’ side of
each picket and angled such that the diameter of the picket was covered.
It was decided to change the feedwell to a closed feedwell design with a separate deflector cone for each
of the feedwell rings. Figures 3 and 4 show the installed deflector cones. The flocculant addition was
modified to a four point addition with one dosing point at the feed launder entry to the feedwell, one
dosing point in the inner ring away from the feed launder and two dosing points in the outer feedwell ring.
Figure 4 The top deflector cone limits the downward flow of slurry out of the inner feedwell
Pressure sensors capable of measuring the change in pressure as the density of the slurry changes were
sourced from Endress+Hauser. The average bed density between two points can be calculated from the
differential pressure over that section.
2.2 Results
The trend lines obtained from the operations control system is shown in Figures 7 and 8.
80 1.5
75.280226
1.45
70
1.4
60
1.35
50
Pressure (kPa)
1.3
Underflow sg
40 1.25
1.2
30
1.15
20
1.1
10
1.05
0 1
2011/11/29 20:24 2011/11/30 14:24 2011/12/01 08:24 2011/12/02 02:24
Pre Leach 1 Thickener Wall Bottom Pressure Pre Leach 1 Thickener Cone Pressure
Pre Leach 1 Thickener Top Pressure Pre Leach 1 Thickener Underflow Density
Figure 7 Trends of thickener wall top pressure, thickener wall bottom pressure, the thickener cone
bottom pressure and the underflow sg
24 1.48
22 1.44
20 1.4
Pressure (kPa) or Flow rate (m3/h)
18 1.36
16 1.32
Underflow sg
14 1.28
12 1.24
10 1.2
8 1.16
6 1.12
4 1.08
2 1.04
0 1
2011/11/29 20:24 2011/11/30 14:24 2011/12/01 08:24 2011/12/02 02:24
Figure 8 The trends of the underflow sg, flocculant dosing rate and the side wall top pressure
The pressure trends at different levels in the thickener, as shown in Figure 7, indicate the expected
pressure profile from bottom to top. This pressure profile is utilised to control the thickener bed volume.
The maximum thickener cone pressure measured over the period was 75.28 kPa. This measurement
occurred as a spike and was close to the maximum design specification of 76 kPa, as calculated from the
design criteria, as indicated in Figure 5. During this occurrence, the wall pressures were not excessive,
which leads to the conclusion that the bed density in the cone was very high and some sort of slumping
occurred in the thickener. The pumped slurry density did not indicate the same spike, therefore it was
concluded that some low density material reported to the cone at the same time and diluted the thickener
underflow. This incident was an abnormal case of the normally more gradual correction of the difference
between the cone density and the pumped underflow density.
The flocculant volumetric flow rate trend in Figure 8 indicates that the automated flocculant control is
responding well to changes in the thickener.
The thickener wall top pressure will indicate sliming conditions. When the pressure rises to more than
18.3 kPa, an alarm is activated to indicate an over expanded bed and when the pressure rises to 18.5 kPa,
the thickener is about to slime and the flocculant dosing is increased to maximum. The trend line for the
pressure at this point, as given in Figure 8, indicates that the thickener bed volume is under control.
2.3 Conclusion
The addition of pickets and raking blade modifications increased the thickener capacity and can therefore
be regarded as successful.
The measurement of the density profile in the thickener enabled the implementation of a reliable fully
automated thickener control philosophy that does not utilise maintenance intensive instrumentation. This
thickener control accommodated normal operational changes such as differences in flocculant make-up
strength between batches that resulted in changed dosing volume and changes in feed mineralogy that
resulted in changed flocculant requirement.
This improved information on the conditions in the thickener highlighted the areas where the thickener
performance could be improved.
Figure 9 Turbulence in the feedwell at the point of entry is shown on the left. The feedwell
overflowing is shown on the right
Figure 10 Closer view of the overflowing feedwell on the left. The feedwell filled with solids. The
solids were exposed after the thickener level was lowered
The blocking of the feedwell eventually caused the feedwell discharge plate to shear from the mountings
and fall onto the rake. Figure 11 shows a typical feedwell failure.
The rake drive frame became distorted when the rake was fully lifted and the rake torque was high. Typical
drive frame failure is shown in Figure 12.
4.1 Conclusion
LHM decided to change the process set points of the preceding thickeners and limit the feed density to the
header tank to 1.35 gcm-3 density slurry. These set points will be reviewed when the full Stage 3 capacity is
reached. When the header tank functions correctly and the diluted feed to the thickener is the correct
density, the volumetric flow to the thickener feedwell will increase and the flow dynamics in the feedwell
will improve. The risk of solids build-up in the feedwell will be mitigated. As an additional precaution, the
thickener will be put into operation without flocculant addition. Flocculant will only be dosed after five
minutes, once the flow dynamics in the feedwell has stabilised.
Operational procedures to recover the header tank with minimal process disruption have been developed.
The thickeners have been performing well in terms of the underflow and have produced the specified
underflow density.
5 Paste system
The LHM paste system consists of a 12 m UltraSep 2000 High Performance Thickener supplied by MPE; feed
and underflow systems designed by P&C and a TSF designed by Metago Environmental Engineers. Metago
Environmental Engineers has been incorporated in SLR Consulting. The TSF was designed to accept slurry
with a density range from 1.50–1.6 gcm-3.
The UltraSep 2000 is a rakeless thickener. The commissioning of the UltraSep 2000 proved to be a major
challenge. The underflow density was unpredictable and ranged from 1.38–1.55 gcm-3 with the most
common densities in the range 1.43–1.48 gcm-3. The low density material reporting to the TSF filled the TSF
quicker than planned. Under some calculated scenarios, the TSF life could decrease by almost a year should
the deposition of low density material continue.
The water that reported to the TSF was more than planned for and additional measures had to be taken to
pump the water back to the plant and prevent environmental contamination. The rate of TSF wall building
had to be increased.
During commissioning the UltraSep 2000 internal cones deformed and sheared off the mountings. The
thickener had to be repaired. MPE lifted and remounted the internals under guarantee. The deformation
and failure is shown in Figures 15 and 16 respectively.
The vendor has made some design changes to the vibrators on the thickener cone and installed additional
vibrators to mitigate the challenges. These changes were commissioned, but did not manage to increase
the underflow to a consistent density within the STF design range.
Figure 16 The UltraSep 2000 internals were sheared off the mountings
5.1 Conclusion
LHM decided to install two Endress+Hauser viscometers: one at the in-plant tailings system feeding the
UltraSep 2000 and one at the UltraSep 2000. The viscometers are enhanced Coriolis meters capable of
accurate viscosity and density measurement.
The yield stress of LHM slurry increases rapidly at densities higher than 1.40 gcm-3. The viscometer at the
in-plant tailings would improve the control of the pump and pipeline feeding the UltraSep 2000. This
system can then be operated at densities resulting in the design rheological properties. This would mitigate
the risk of pipeline blockages while the solids transport out of the processing plant can be maximised.
It is envisaged that the viscometer at the UltraSep 2000 would enhance the control of the thickener feed
and would provide information on the rheological properties of the slurry reporting to the TSF.
The viscometer at the thickener will do duty on the thickener overflow and the thickener underflow. The
viscosity and density of the overflow is expected to give direct indication of flocculant over dosing and
thickener sliming conditions respectively. By including the viscometer in the thickener underflow control,
the quantity of low yield stress material reporting to the TSF can be minimised.
LHM also decided to test methods of shear thinning the thickener bed to mitigate the risk of damage to the
thickener internals at high densities. The feed into the feedwell will also be changed in line with newer,
proven feed arrangements.