Open Channel Design Channels PDF
Open Channel Design Channels PDF
lined (nonerodable channels) - are primarily used to maximize flow rates and
minimize construction costs
unlined (erodible channels) - are the least expensive and what is commonly
found in nature, but often experience unacceptable levels of sediment transport
and erosion.
There are many design considerations which are common to all 3 types of chan-
nels. This includes the determination of the best hydraulic section. The best
hydraulic section will accommodate the design flow at a reasonable cost and limit
erosion/deposition of sediment and other material.
Trapezoidal Channel
Rearranging
3/5
Qn
A= √ P 2/5
So
Restating the above statement another way, we need to minimize A & P with
respect to Q or
3/5
Qn
√
So
Recall the area and wetted perimeter definitions for a trapezoidal cross section
Combining the optimum perimeter and optimum slope equations, we can deter-
mine the best hydraulic section for a trapezoid is
This solution assumes the channel slope can be set to any value. Often this is
not possible, in which case use a known (or specified) m value to determine the
optimum perimeter. Please note, in the design of lined channels, the side slope is
often specified as being less than 33.7o . The best hydraulic section for a variety
of channels is given in the below table
Other considerations
Freeboard
The freeboard is the vertical distance between the water surface and the top
of the channel slope. It’s basically a factor of safety to keep the channel from
overflowing. For unlined channels, the freeboard is estimated with:
√
F = 0.55 Cy
where
F is the freeboard in meters
y is the design flow depth
C is a coefficient
where
V is the average velocity
T is the top width of the channel
rc is the bend radius
········································································
Example:
Design lined channel to carry 20 m3 /s on a longitudinal slope of 0.0015. The
lining of the channel is to be reinforced float finished concrete. Consider a) the
best hydraulic section and b) a section with side slopes of 1.5:1 (H:V).
········································································
Solution:
a) given:
1
Q= AR2/3 So1/2
n
b = 2.4 m
yn = 2.09 m
3. Verify that:
• minimum permissible velocities are being met
V = 2.6 m/s
• flow is subcritical, F r < 0.8
F r = 0.66
F = 1.04 m
b)
1
Q= AR2/3 So1/2
n
b = 1.16 m
yn = 1.94 m
V = 2.53 m/s
• flow is subcritical, F r < 0.8
F r = 0.76
• maximum permissible velocities are being met
V < 5.5 m/s reinforced channels
F = 1.00 m
········································································
The stress applied by the flow is not applied evenly to the channel sidewalls and
bottom walls. For the two conditions it is defined with
bottom
side
The stress required to move particles on the bottom is a function of the immersed
particle weight, the particle geometry, and the applied friction between particles.
Where
For particles on the side slope of the channel, the relationship with gravity is
more complicated. The above expression is modified, so the critical stress to
move particles on the channel sides becomes
where
The ratio of the critical shear stress on the side to the critical shear stress on the
bottom is defined as the tractive force ratio, K, with
6. Estimate the permissible tractive force on the bottom and sides of the channel
7. Assume permissible shear stress on the channel sides is the limiting design
factor, and determine the normal depth
9. Compare the permissible tractive force on the bottom with the actual tractive
force
10. Compare the permissible velocity and calculate the Froude number (verify
that it is subcritical)
········································································
Example:
Design a trapezoidal channel to carry 20 m3 /s through a slightly sinuous channel
on a slope of 0.0015. The channel is to be excavated in course alluvium with a
75-percentile diameter of 2 cm (.8 in) and with particles on the perimeter of the
channel moderately rounded.
········································································
Solution:
Step 1. Estimate the roughness coefficient, n, and select the freeboard coeffi-
cient, C, based on the design flowrate in the channel.
Step 6. Estimate the permissible tractive force on the bottom and sides of the
channel
Step 8. Calculate the required bottom width, b, of the channel using Manning’s
equation
Step 9. Compare the permissible tractive force on the bottom with the actual
tractive force
Grass-lined channels are often used to transmit intermittent irrigation and storm
water flows. They are often preferable to lined channels because they provide
increased storage, low velocities, and aesthetic benefits. The additional design
considerations for grass-lined channels include:
The Manning’s n for the various retardances is given in the below figure.
Channel Cross Sections - In addition to the best hydraulic section and slope
stability, grass lined channels may have to be designed to allow farm equipment
to cross.
This procedure must be completed for BOTH upper and lower bound of retar-
dance i.e. mowed and unmowed conditions).
1. Assume a depth of flow for the channel assumed in Stage I and compute A
and R
4. Determine n from the attached figure using the upper bound retardance
5. Use the n from step 4, R from step 1, compute V from the manning’s equation
Example
Solution
given:
Q = 0.7m3 /s
So = 0.02
Bermuda grass
easily eroded soil
Stage I: E retardance
Stage II: B retardance
Stage I
1. - 4. guess at n, determine V R
determine Vmax from table
compute R = V R/Vmax
find new V R from Manning’s eq.
repeat with adjusted n
n VR VR R VR ∆n
(f t2 /s) 2
(m /s) (m) 2
(m /s)
fig 4.33 fig V R/Vmax = R5/3 So1/2 /n
4.33 / 10.76
m = 1.71
y = 0.48 m
note: you’ll get two solutions for m and have to chose the best
Stage II:
Y A R V VR VR n V ∆V
(m) (m2 ) (m) (m/s) (m /s) (f t2 /s)
2
(m/s)
V R/ = Q/A V R∗ fig 4.33 = R2/3 So1/2 /
Vmax 10.76 n
F = 0.3