Crash Course On Climate Change
Crash Course On Climate Change
The former chief of the U.S. Navy’s Pacific Command once called climate change our
country’s single biggest security threat.1 The world leader of the Catholic Church, Pope Francis,
put it this way: “The violence that exists in the human heart is also manifest in the symptoms of
illness that we see in the Earth.”2 Greta Thunberg described climate change as the largest crisis
humanity has ever faced.3 So, what is climate change? How does it work, and what caused it?
Why might it, as some popular media claims, be a lot worse than expected?
To understand the complexities of climate change, we must first understand the basics.
The root of climate change is a gas called carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is at the foundation of
many processes essential to life, and has been emitted naturally for millennia — for instance,
through humans breathing, plants decomposing, and releases from the oceans. Carbon dioxide
naturally cycles between the Earth’s land surface; soil; rocks; the oceans; and the atmosphere.
Carbon moves via a slow cycle and a fast cycle. The fast cycle occurs on an annual basis,
as plants on land and in the oceans use carbon for photosynthesis in order to grow. It is then
released through plant decay, decomposition, or burning, or through the respiration (breathing)
The slow cycle moves carbon between ancient rocks, oceans, soil, and the atmosphere.
This happens over millions of years through a number of processes. Carbon dioxide dissolves in
— and ventilates out of — the ocean. Carbon in the atmosphere combines with water and falls to
the Earth’s surface as rain, which dissolves the rocks (a process called weathering). Volcanoes
1
From Bender, 2013
2
From Packett, 2015
3
From Nilsen, 2019
4
From Riebeek, 2011
release carbon to the atmosphere when they erupt.5 Without human interference, the carbon in
these rocks would leak slowly into the atmosphere through volcanic activity over millions of
years.
The rocks that store most of the Earth’s carbon originated millions of years ago. Between
280 and 360 million years ago, trees the size of houses and colossal ferns covered the planet, and
sheets of green algae blanketed the seas. This era was named the “Carboniferous Period” for its
abundance of carbon-rich plant life.6 However, because decomposers had not evolved yet, when
these plants died, they sunk to the bottom of swamps and oceans and remained there.7 As
millennia passed, more and more rock, sand, mud and clay was piled on top of these layers. The
land plants in swamps were squeezed so much that the water came out of them, and they turned
to a spongy material called peat, and then, millennia later, to coal.8 The marine algae and
microscopic marine organisms sunk to the bottom of the oceans, and were squeezed so much that
they were pushed upward and became trapped in reservoirs. These turned into oil and natural
gas.9
For millennia, most of these fossils remained underground and out of harm’s way.
Up until about 1750, carbon dioxide was not a problem because all of the CO2 that was
naturally released was absorbed by natural sources—mostly by the ocean, but also by trees and
This all changed in around 1750, when Europe and the U.S. started to burn these
5
From Shapley, 2010 & Riebeek, 2011
6
From Climate, 2017
7
From Jusay, Mayberry & Yu, 2011
8
From Rafferty, 2017
9
From Mac, 2016
10
From Lindsey, 2019
By burning coal, oil, and natural gas, humans began releasing vast amounts of carbon —
carbon that took millions of years to accumulate — into the atmosphere. In other words, we
began to move carbon from the slow cycle to the fast cycle, emitting much more than natural
About 70 percent of our carbon emissions since the Industrial Revolution have come
from fossil fuels (i.e. from electricity and heat, agriculture, and transportation) while around 30
percent have come from deforestation.11 Deforestation has two major effects: first, releasing
carbon by cutting down trees, and second, removing trees, which suck carbon out of the
So, you might be wondering: how does all of this change our climate?
When certain gases are not absorbed by natural sources, they accumulate in the
atmosphere.
Normally, when the Sun’s radiation hits the Earth’s surface, a portion of it is reflected
back out to space. Some atmospheric gases — like oxygen — are transparent to both incoming
radiation from the Sun and outgoing radiation from the Earth’s surface. This means they do not
trap any of this radiation in the atmosphere, keeping the Earth’s energy balance stable.
However, “greenhouse gases” — like carbon dioxide and water vapor — work
differently. Although they are transparent to incoming solar radiation — letting energy in from
the sun — they absorb radiation from the Earth’s surface. Thus, they trap heat in the lower levels
of the atmosphere, warming the planet. This leads to what is called “the greenhouse effect,” the
11
From Lallanilla, 2019
12
From Denchak, 2019
There are currently more carbon dioxide molecules in the atmosphere (per million
molecules) than ever before in human history.13 By the end of this century, the world will likely
warm at least 2 degrees Celsius (4 degrees Fahrenheit) as a result, and probably more.
Why will we see this warming by the end of the century, and not immediately? It all goes
back to the oceans. To understand this, you must first know that cold, salty water is denser than
warm, less salty water. This difference in density drives an ocean “conveyor belt,” which
continually replaces deep ocean water with water from the surface, and replaces surface water
with water rising from deeper depths. Called the “thermohaline circulation,” this process is also
responsible for cold, salty water from the poles moving toward the tropics, and warm surface
waters from near the tropics moving toward the poles. Carbon dioxide is moved through the
oceans through this very mechanism.14 Because of how slow this circulation is, it takes a few
decades for carbon emitted by humans to reach the atmosphere.15 This paints a scary picture,
because it means that, even if we stopped emitting today, we would still be committed to decades
Different scientists predict different amounts of warming based on current trends. The
most knowledgeable group of experts — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
— has temperature predictions ranging from 1 to 5.4 degrees Celsius of warming (compared to
before the Industrial Revolution) by 2100. Most agree that the largest cause for uncertainty is not
the science of the natural world, but the unpredictability of human behavior.16 Whether we
drastically reduce our emissions or continue on our current trajectory will seal the fate of the
Earth.
13
From Freedman, 2013
14
From Rahmstorf, 2006
15
From Dahlman & Lindsey, 2018
16
From Kunreuther & Gupta, 2014
Another cause for uncertainty in climate change predictions exists in “feedback loops.”
These are scenarios under which, after a certain threshold of warming, negative environmental
effects begin to spin out of control. One such feedback loop is the ice-albedo feedback. As
mentioned earlier, a fraction of incoming solar radiation is reflected back out to space. The
amount of radiation that is reflected is determined by how reflective the Earth’s surface is. White
objects reflect more energy, while dark objects absorb more. (If you’ve ever leaned against a
black car on a hot day, you’ve witnessed this first-hand.) The reflectivity of something is referred
to as its “albedo.” On a planetary scale, Earth’s albedo depends on clear/white masses like ice
caps, glaciers, and ice sheets. As climate change warms the Earth, masses of ice melt. As ice
melts, the Earth’s albedo decreases. Less energy is reflected, more is absorbed, the Earth warms
(including rocks and soil) that remains frozen year-round. Most is found in high-latitude regions
in and around the Arctic. Currently, the Arctic is warming more rapidly than any other region on
Earth. Thus, permafrost is thawing at unprecedented rates. When layers of permafrost thaw, this
wakes up microbes in the soil that decompose organic matter. This decomposition releases CO2
as well as methane, a greenhouse gas that has a warming potential around 30 times that of CO2.
As atmospheric CO2 and methane levels rise, the Earth will warm more, causing more
permafrost thawing, and so on. Scientists have historically underestimated the effects of
permafrost, and the IPCC only incorporated permafrost into its temperature projections a few
17
From Ahlenius, 2007
years ago.18 New research suggests that we will need to cut emissions eight years sooner than
Arguably the most important feedback loop relates to the stuff of life: water. A warmer
atmosphere can hold more water vapor. It’s a basic property of physics: the amount of water
vapour a given amount of air can hold is directly proportional to its temperature. Thus, an
atmosphere warmed by climate change is capable of holding more water vapour molecules. (This
is why climate change produces more extreme storms, as all that water is rained down in
greenhouse gas. Water vapor itself traps heat in the atmosphere, causing warming. So, as the
atmosphere warms, it will be able to hold more water vapor, which will warm it even more.20
At this point, you may be wondering: is there reason for hope? Despair not. The nations
of the world have come together in the past to remedy a global environmental problem, and there
is no reason why we cannot do the same in the face of climate change. In the 1980s, scientists
discovered a gaping hole in the ozone layer of the Earth’s atmosphere that appeared over
Antarctica.
The ozone layer is found in the stratosphere, the layer of atmosphere located between 6
and 30 miles above Earth’s surface.21 It was depleted (creating the “ozone hole”) as a result of
Ozone levels rapidly decrease each year in August and September, so the ozone hole is at
its deepest between late September and early October. It appears over Antarctica because of the
extremely cold conditions in the polar stratosphere during the winter and spring months.22
18
From Leahy, 2019
19
From Fountain, 2017
20
From Hausfather, 2008
21
From Gleason, 2008
At this point, you may be wondering, why does this hole in the ozone layer matter?
protects organisms from the power of the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays, much like sunscreen.
Without the ozone layer, the sun’s radiation would damage the DNA of many animals and
plants, and many plants would die, which would cause the food chain to collapse.23 The bottom
In the late twentieth century, scientists traced ozone depletion to a number of products
that contained chemicals called “chlorofluorocarbons” (CFCs). They were mostly coolants in
refrigerants and air conditioners, foam-blowing agents, and aerosol sprays like hairsprays.24
In 1987, members of the U.N. ratified the Montreal Protocol, which would gradually
phase out all CFCs in the following few years. It was the first universally ratified treaty in U.N.
history. Ever since then, global CFC use has plummeted, and the ozone hole has been gradually
shrinking (although it may appear bigger or smaller during a given year because of temperature
fluctuations — recall that the ozone hole depends on cold temperatures to form).25 The ozone
As the Montreal Protocol demonstrates, the world’s nations are capable of banding
together to unify under a common rallying cry, in the name of environmental protection. Earth’s
most intelligent life is capable of facing the most foreboding existential threat it has ever had to
grapple with, of making sacrifices to ensure an inhabitable planet for our children. And our work
starts now.
22
From Solomon, 2004
23
From Dunbar, 2016
24
From Nunez, 2019
25
From Leahy, 2017
26
From Mosbergen, 2018
References
Ahlenius, H. (2007). Climate feedbacks - the connectivity of the positive ice/snow albedo
feedback, terrestrial snow and vegetation feedbacks and the negative cloud/radiation
Bender, B. (2013, March 9). Chief of US Pacific forces calls climate biggest worry. Boston
samuel-locklear-commander-pacific-forces-warns-that-climate-change-top-
threat/BHdPVCLrWEMxRe9IXJZcHL/story.html
http://www.barrettbellamyclimate.com/page40.htm.
Dahlman, L. A., & Lindsey, R. (2018, August 1). Climate Change: Ocean Heat Content.
change-ocean-heat-content.
Denchak, M. (n.d.). Greenhouse Effect 101. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from
https://www.nrdc.org/stories/greenhouse-effect-101.
Dunbar, B. (2016, June 24). Ozone: What is it, and why do we care about it? Retrieved from
https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/postsecondary/features/F_Ozone.html.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/23/climate/alaska-permafrost-thawing.html.
Freedman, A. (2013, May 3). The Last Time CO2 Was This High, Humans Didn’t Exist.
humans-didnt-exist-15938.
https://www.ozonelayer.noaa.gov/science/basics.htm.
Hausfather, Z. (2008, February 4). The Water Vapor Feedback. Retrieved from
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2008/02/common-climate-misconceptions-the-
water-vapor-feedback-2/.
Jusay, A., Mayberry, R., & Yu, C. (2011). The Carboniferous Period. Retrieved from
https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/carboniferous/carboniferous.php.
Kunreuther, H., & Gupta, S. (2014). Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter2.pdf.
Lallanilla, M. (2019, January 3). Greenhouse Gasses: Causes, Sources and Environmental
Leahy, S. (2015, September 25). 30 Years Old, The Montreal Protocol Saved the Ozone
protocol-ozone-treaty-30-climate-change-hcfs-hfcs/.
Leahy, S. (2019, April 23). A warming Arctic could cost the world trillions of dollars.
change-feedback-loops-cost-trillions/.
Lindsey, R. (2019, September 19). Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Retrieved
from https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-
atmospheric-carbon-dioxide.
Mac, D. (2016, February 18). How does the formation of coal differ from that of natural gas
differ-from-that-of-natural-gas-and-oil.
Mosbergen, D. (2018, November 8). After decades of global action, the ozone layer is on the
the-ozone-layer-is-on-the-road-to-recovery/.
Nilsen, E. (2019, September 19). Greta Thunberg is not alone in her climate activism.
activism-washington-sunrise.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/ozone-depletion/.
Packett, M. (2015, June 16). Pope’s call to act on climate change must be heeded by
on-climate-change-media-packet/.
Rafferty, J. P. (2017). Do Fossil Fuels Really Come from Fossils? Retrieved from
https://www.britannica.com/story/do-fossil-fuels-really-come-from-fossils.
potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Book_chapters/rahmstorf_eqs_2006.pdf.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/CarbonCycle.
http://butane.chem.uiuc.edu/pshapley/Environmental/L29/2.html.
https://www.nature.com/