Stochastic Frontier Analysis and DEA
Stochastic Frontier Analysis and DEA
Stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) is a method of economic modeling. It has its starting point in
the stochastic production frontier models simultaneously introduced by Aigner, Lovell and Schmidt
(1977) and Meeusen and Van denk Broeck (1977).
The production frontier model without random component can be written as:
the best where yi is the observed scalar output of the producer i, i=1,..I, xi is a vector
of N inputs used by the producer i, f(xi, β) is the production frontier, and is a vector of
technology parameters to be estimated.
TEi denotes the technical efficiency defined as the ratio of observed output to maximum feasible
output. TEi = 1 shows that the i-th firm obtains the maximum feasible output, while TEi < 1 provides
a measure of the shortfall of the observed output from maximum feasible output.
A stochastic component that describes random shocks affecting the production process is added.
These shocks are not directly attributable to the producer or the underlying technology. These
shocks may come from weather changes, economic adversities or plain luck. We denote these
effects with . Each producer is facing a different shock, but we assume the shocks are
random and they are described by a common distribution.
The stochastic production frontier will become:
We assume that TEi is also a stochastic variable, with a specific distribution function, common to all
producers.
Now, if we also assume that f(xi, β) takes the log-linear Cobb-Douglas form, the model can be written
as:
where vi is the “noise” component, which we will almost always consider as a two-sided normally
distributed variable, and ui is the non-negative technical inefficiency component. Together they
constitute a compound error term, with a specific distribution to be determined, hence the name of
“composed error model” as is often referred.
Stochastic Frontier Analysis has examined also "cost" and "profit" efficiency (see Kumbhakar &
Lovel 2003). The "Cost frontier" approach attempts to measure how far from full-cost minimization
(i.e. cost-efficiency) is the firm. Modeling-wise, the non-negative cost-inefficiency component is
added rather than subtracted in the stochastic specification. "Profit frontier analysis" examines the
case where producers are treated as profit-maximizers (both output and inputs should be decided by
the firm) and not as cost-minimizers, (where level of output is considered as exogenously given).
The specification here is similar with the "production frontier" one.
Stochastic Frontier Analysis has also been applied in micro data of consumer demand in an attempt
to benchmark consumption and segment consumers. In a two-stage approach, a stochastic frontier
model is estimated and subsequently deviations from the frontier are regressed on consumer
characteristics (Baltas 2005)
"The framework has been adapted from multi-input, multi-output production functions and applied in
many industries. DEA develops a function whose form is determined by the most efficient producers.
This method differs from the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) statistical technique that bases
comparisons relative to an average producer. Like Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), DEA identifies
a "frontier" which are characterized as an extreme point method that assumes that if a firm can
produce a certain level of output utilizing specific input levels, another firm of equal scale should be
capable of doing the same. The most efficient producers can form a 'composite producer', allowing
the computation of an efficient solution for every level of input or output. Where there is no actual
corresponding firm, 'virtual producers' are identified to make comparisons" (Berg 2010).
Attempts to synthesize DEA and SFA, improving upon their drawbacks, were also made in the
literature, via proposing various versions of non-parametric SFA [1]and Stochastic DEA.[2]