Velocity and Acceleration Lab Reportt
Velocity and Acceleration Lab Reportt
Distance
Incline Average of
Angle Time Time Time time for incline Accelera
(degrees Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 3 trials plane Velocity tion
) (s) (s) (s) (s) (cm) (cm/s) (cm/s^2)
Rolling Object -
Car 10 1.68 1.78 1.52 1.66 198.10 119.34 71.89
25 1.32 1.37 1.17 1.29 186.70 145.10 112.77
40 0.93 1.05 0.98 0.99 160.00 162.16 164.35
Rolling Object -
Ball 10 2.17 2.27 2.47 2.30 198.10 86.01 37.34
25 1.24 1.30 1.39 1.31 186.70 142.52 108.79
40 1.22 1.30 1.27 1.26 160.00 126.65 100.25
Rolling Objects -
Car + Ball 10 2.19 2.27 2.22 2.23 198.10 88.97 39.96
25 1.58 1.12 1.32 1.34 186.70 139.33 103.98
40 1.19 0.89 1.25 1.11 160.00 144.14 129.86
Analysis and Results: The fastest were the steepest, as expected, but the car rolled faster alone
than it did with a ball, perhaps due to the balance of weight. The results may have been
interfered with by inaccuracies in timing or the fallibilities of the connection between car and ball.
Paragraph: We were investigating the question of how the shape of an object and the angle of a
ramp affect the acceleration downward. The fastest was the car at 45 degrees.
I have been unable to compare results with other researchers, though I presume they would be
similar.
The fastest were the steepest, as expected, but the car rolled faster alone than it did with a ball,
perhaps due to the balance of weight. The results may have been interfered with by
inaccuracies in timing or the fallibilities of the connection between car and ball.