Micro-Phasor Measurement Units (Μpmus) And Its Applications In Smart Distribution Systems
Micro-Phasor Measurement Units (Μpmus) And Its Applications In Smart Distribution Systems
net/publication/322626012
CITATIONS READS
4 1,593
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Power Quality Improvement through Smart Metering in Distribution System View project
Load -flow and stable planning of radial distribution networks using distributed generation View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Alok Jain on 07 May 2018.
Abstract The installation of phasor measurement units (PMUs) in the power grids
is mainly focused on the transmission systems. Researchers are continuously
working on the PMUs for its installation in the transmission system. But, now due
to the advancement in distribution system, i.e., for smart distribution system, a
device is going to be installed which creates real-time synchrophasor data from the
consumer voltage level, called lPMUs, which could provide new insight into
modern power systems. These units can be created more cheaply, an order of
magnitude less, than current commercial PMUs. For this reason, many more
lPMUs could be deployed and provide a much higher resolution of the distribution
grid. So, in this paper, the concepts like why we need micro-PMUs and its block
diagram are explained. This paper also discusses the applications for synchrophasor
technology in distribution systems.
1 Introduction
A. Jain (&)
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU),
Varanasi, India
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Bhullar
Department of Electrical & Instrumentation Engineering, Thapar University,
Patiala Punjab, India
and lPMU has 0.01°. A multiphase power flow model and state estimation for
distribution systems have been formulated, and solution methods have been pre-
sented. It also addresses the following issues like modeling, implementation,
observability, and performance [1]. The problem of state estimation in very large
power systems has been investigated which may contain several control areas [2].
An approach, which leaves the traditional state estimation software in place, dis-
cusses a novel method of incorporating the phasor measurements, and the results of
the traditional state estimator in a post-processing linear estimator have been dis-
cussed [3]. The benefits of using PMUs for selected real-time applications and
present ongoing pilot projects and experience worldwide, and to give short- and
long-term road map for future acts have been discussed [4, 5]. Different mea-
surement techniques have been developed by employing global positioning system
(GPS) receivers that are suited to the continuous monitoring of the electrical
quantities in distribution networks in terms of synchronized phasors [6]. A brief
introduction to the PMU and wide-area measurement system (WAMS) technology
has been presented and also discusses the uses of these measurements for improved
monitoring, protection, and control of power networks [7]. Diverse concepts for the
next generation of power distribution system have been summarized whose
objective is to bring distribution engineering more closely aligned to smart grid
philosophy [8]. Phasor measurement units (PMUs) were installed in an industrial
distribution network, and synchronized measurements taken from the PMU at
medium and low voltage during different system states were analyzed [9]. Different
applications based on energy accounting on the acquisition of the phasor mea-
surements using phasor measurement units (PMU) have been discussed [10]. The
developments and present status of the Indian power grid have been discussed and
also explore the key areas in which a wider deployment of PMUs may be utilized to
make the national grid smart [11]. A new probabilistic approach of the real-time
state estimation on the micro-grid has been presented [12]. The performances of a
phasor measurement unit (PMU) prototype based on a synchrophasor estimation
algorithm conceived for the monitoring of active distribution networks have been
introduced [13]. A new technique for estimation of distribution network load model
parameters based on PMU measurements data and harmony search algorithm
(HSA) have been proposed [14]. The meter placement problem for the measure-
ment infrastructure of an active distribution network, where heterogeneous mea-
surements provided by phasor measurement units (PMUs) and other advanced
measurement systems such as smart metering systems are used in addition to
measurements that are typical of distribution networks has been studied [15]. The
contribution of PMUs that can provide to handling different challenges by exam-
ining recent research results on applications of synchrophasors in distribution
systems has been examined [16]. The state estimator of all buses in a three-phase
network has been presented and proposed greedy algorithm and integer program-
ming optimization method to determine the optimal solution [17]. A mixed-integer
programming formulation of DSE that is capable of simultaneously discarding
predicted values whenever sudden changes in the system state are detected has been
used [18]. Developing and testing frequency-adaptive PMU algorithms with wider
Micro-phasor Measurement Units (lPMUs) and Its Applications … 83
linearity range than specified in IEEE Std C37.118-1 have been evaluated in [19],
by means of three different concepts, i.e., FIR bandpass filtering, extended Kalman
filtering (EKF), and discrete Fourier transform (DFT). The impact of the uncer-
tainties (in terms of phase and magnitude) introduced by arbitrary PMUs on a state
estimation process performed on the IEEE 13-bus distribution test feeder has been
analyzed [20, 21].
Higher degree of accuracy is required for distribution as the angle differences and
changes are significantly smaller than in transmission because of the different X/R
ratios. lPMU plays an important role in distribution planning and operations as
measurement of phase angle and difference in angle between points provides the
ability to calculate impedance which is not possible without the PMU. Phase angle
also gives information on the direction of power flow for analysis of topology
changes or errors. Line level measurement represents an improvement over smart
metering for estimating loads on a per phase basis. Today, PMUs are almost
exclusively used in high-voltage power transmission. Distribution system applica-
tions are more challenging, in three important respects:
1. The voltage angle differences between two locations on a distribution circuit
will tend to be at least an order of magnitude smaller than those on the trans-
mission network, because the power flows are much smaller, and the reactance
between points of interest is also much smaller. Consequently, meaningful
measurement of phase angle differences on distribution systems requires much
higher precision—meaning more precise time-stamping and shorter latencies in
every step of the transfer of the measurement. Accuracies of the PMUs can still
vary by ±1°, while the proposed lPMU technology is expected to discern angle
differences to an accuracy of better than ±0.05°.
2. Distribution system measurements will be fraught with much more noise from
which the signal must be extracted. This is simply due to the proximity of a
large number of different devices connected per mile of circuit at the distribution
level, including loads as well as utility switchgear, transformers, capacitors, that
may introduce harmonic distortion and transients. Consequently, the back-
ground “noise” must be analyzed carefully along with the angle measurements
and with the same time stamp. This functionality is not yet standard in PMUs for
transmission, where power disturbances are sufficiently infrequent that it is not
necessary to explicitly link PMU data to a range of concurrent electrical events.
To interpret the rare major disturbance, angle data must then be cross-referenced
with data from other monitoring devices after the fact.
3. The economic value of transmission power flows means that larger investments
can be justified, with less pressure on the acceptable costs of instrumentation as
well as data transmission and concentration. By comparison, the installed costs
84 A. Jain and S. Bhullar
must be far lower to make a reasonable business case for the installation of
multiple PMUs on a distribution circuit, simply based on the amount of con-
nected load whose service quality or reliability would stand to benefit from
increased visibility and better understanding of the dynamics on the circuit.
4. The PMU device can be connected to single- or three-phase secondary distri-
bution circuits up to 690 V (line-to-line) or 400 V (line-to-neutral), either into
standard outlets or through potential transformers (PTs) as are already found at
distribution substations or could be added on primary distribution circuits if
necessary.
x being the frequency of the signal in radian per second, and u being the phase
angle in radians.
Equation (1) can also be written as
A sinusoid and its phasor representation are shown in Fig. 1a, b. The phase angle
of the phasor is arbitrary, as it depends upon the choice of the axis t = 0. Note that
the length of the phasor is equal to the RMS value of the sinusoid.
B. Block Diagram of Micro-phasor Measurement Unit:
Phasor measurement unit (PMU) technology provides phasor information (both
magnitude and phase angle) in real time, and its block diagram is shown in Fig. 2.
The analog inputs are currents and voltages obtained from the secondary windings
of the current and voltage transformers. The current and voltage signals are con-
verted to voltages with appropriate shunts or instrument transformers so that they
are matched with the requirements of the analog-to-digital converters. The sampling
rate chosen for the sampling process dictates the frequency response of the
anti-aliasing filters. In most cases, these are analog-type filters with a cutoff fre-
quency less than half the sampling frequency in order to satisfy the Nyquist cri-
terion. The sampling clock is phase-locked with the GPS clock pulse. Sampling rate
can be used 12 samples per cycle of the nominal power frequency to as high as 96
or 128 samples per cycle. The microprocessor calculates positive-sequence esti-
mates of all the current and voltage signals.
C. Global Positioning System:
The most important use of the GPS system is to generate the signal of one
pulse-per-second. This pulse when received by any receiver on earth is coincident
with all other received pulses within 1 ls. In practice, much better accuracies of
synchronization of the order of a few hundred nanoseconds have been realized. There
are four satellites in each of the six orbital planes displaced from each other by 60° and
having an inclination of about 55° with respect to the equatorial plane, which orbit
around the earth with a period of half a day as shown in Fig. 3. The GPS satellites keep
accurate clocks which provide the one pulse-per-second signal.
D. Hierarchy for PMUs:
The PMUs are situated in power system substations and provide measurements
of time-stamped positive-sequence voltages and currents as well as frequency and
rate of change of frequency of all monitored buses and feeders. The measurements
are stored in local data storage devices, which can be accessed from remote loca-
tions for diagnostic purposes. The phasor data are also available for real-time
applications. At the next level, phasor data concentrators (PDCs) are present as
shown in Fig. 4, which gather and record the data, reject altered data, and align the
time stamps from several PMUs. PDCs have storage facilities and application
functions which need the PMU data available at the PDC. This can be made
available by the PDCs to the local applications in real time. An another level of the
hierarchy is called super data concentrator (SDC) where there is facility for data
storage of data aligned with time tags as well as a steady stream of near real-time
data for applications which require data over the entire system. Figure 4 shows the
communication links to be bidirectional. As, most of the data flow is upward in the
hierarchy, although there are some tasks which require communication capability in
the reverse direction.
E. Communication links for PMUs:
Communication facilities are essential for applications requiring phasor data at
remote locations. Generally, two types of data transfer are used in any communication
task. Channel capacity is the measure of the data rate that can be sustained on the
available data link. The second aspect is the latency, defined as the time lag between the
time at which the data is created and when it is available for the desired application.
Diagnostic analysis applications require PMU data to help in analyzing the power
system performance during major disturbances. Leased telephone circuits were among
the first communication media used for these purposes. Switched telephone circuits can
be used when data transfer latency is not of importance. Electric utility communication
media like power line carrier and microwave links have also been used. But, now the
fiber-optic links is used as the medium which have high data transfer rates, unsurpassed
channel capacity, and immunity to electromagnetic interference.
4 Distribution Applications
A. Diagnostic Applications:
Diagnostic applications for consideration includes island detection, fault location
and high-impedance fault detection, identification of fault-induced delayed voltage
recovery (FIDVR), distribution system state estimation including reverse power
flow detection and phase balancing, renewable generation monitoring, oscillation
detection, characterization of generator inertia, supporting transmission system
diagnostics, and many more.
Some of them are explained below:
(1) Island Detection:
Today’s inverters have very reliable anti-islanding protection. However, with
greater penetration of diverse distributed resources and more complex dynamics on
distribution circuits, it may become increasingly difficult-to-distinguish fault events
from other abnormal conditions where it is desirable to keep DG online (e.g.,
low-voltage ride-through). The comparison of phase angle between a potential
island and the rest of the grid is the most definitive test that offers not only high
sensitivity, but specificity—i.e., ruling out an island if the phase angle remains
locked, and thus allowing generators to remain online when they are needed most.
Preventing DG from unnecessary trips during stressed grid conditions has important
implications not only for distribution power quality and reliability but for trans-
mission operators as well, who are increasingly concerned about the vulnerability of
the grid to cascading events behind the substation.
(2) Fault Detection and Location:
Protective devices on distribution circuits are generally based on overcurrent
relays that respond to a combination of current magnitude and duration. This makes
it very difficult to detect high-impedance faults, where the fault current is similar in
magnitude to load current. Furthermore, once a fault is isolated, its exact location is
difficult to determine remotely.
The actuation of a particular circuit breaker or fuse only identifies a general
section of a feeder where the fault has occurred. The standard approach then is for
line crews to physically patrol the length of the faulted line section, looking
for damaged equipment. This process is time-consuming and costly, even more so
for underground cables.
Algorithms exist for recognizing high-impedance faults as well as for locating
faults through proper analysis of monitored data, but the quality of available mea-
surements on distribution circuits is often insufficient to support them. We expect that
lPMUs will allow fault detection and location with much greater precision than
before, even with relatively few devices deployed on a circuit. This is because voltage
angle measurement makes it possible to compute changes in impedance between two
measured points and thus diagnose a fault even if the current magnitude is insufficient
to trip a protective relay. The impedance between the faulted point and a PMU
on either side then also indicates the relative location of the fault. If successful,
Micro-phasor Measurement Units (lPMUs) and Its Applications … 89
5 Conclusions
References
1. Meliopoulos APS, Zhang F (1996) Multiphase power flow and state estimation for power
distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Sys 11(2):939–946
2. Zhao L, Abur A (2005) Multiarea state estimation using synchronized phasor measurements.
IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(2):456–462
3. Zhou M, Centeno VA, Thorp JS, Phadke AG (2006) An alternative for including phasor
measurements in state estimators. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(4):1930–1937
4. Skok S, Ivankovic I, Cerina Z (2007) Applications based on PMU technology for improved
power system utilization. In: IEEE power engineering society general meeting
5. Tate JE, Overbye TJ (2008) Line outage detection using phasor angle measurements. IEEE
Trans Power Syst 23(4):1644–1652
6. Carta A, Locci N, Muscas C, Sulis S (2008) A flexible GPS-based system for synchronized
phasor measurement in electric distribution networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(11):
2450–2456
7. Carta A, Locci N, Muscas C (2009) A PMU for the measurement of synchronized harmonic
phasors in three-phase distribution networks. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58(10):3723–3730
8. De La Ree J, Centeno V, Thorp JS, Phadke AG (2010) Synchronized phasor measurement
applications in power systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 1(1):20–27
9. Heydt GT (2010) The next generation of power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid
1(3):225–235
10. Naumann A, Komarnicki P, Powalko M, Styczynski ZA, Blumschein J, Kereit M (2010)
Experience with PMUs in industrial distribution networks. In: Power and energy society
general meeting. IEEE
11. Wache M, Murray DC (2011) Application of synchrophasor measurements for distribution
networks. In: Power and energy society general meeting. IEEE
92 A. Jain and S. Bhullar
12. Rihan M, Ahmad M, Beg MS (2011) Phasor measurement units in the indian smart grid. In:
Innovative smart grid technologies India (ISGT India). IEEE PES
13. Chenine M, Vanfretti L, Bengtsson S, Nordström L (2011) Implementation of an
experimental wide-area monitoring platform for development of synchronized phasor
measurement applications. In: Power and energy society general meeting. IEEE
14. Ding F, Booth CD (2011) Applications of PMUs in power distribution networks with
distributed generation. In: Proceedings of the 46th international universities’ power
engineering conference (UPEC)
15. Bahabadi HB, Mirzaei A, Moallem M (2011) Optimal placement of phasor measurement
units for harmonic state estimation in unbalanced distribution system using genetic
algorithms. In: 21st International conference on systems engineering (ICSEng)
16. Alinejad B, Akbari M, Kazemi H (2012) PMU-Based distribution network load modeling
using harmony search algorithm. In: Proceedings of 17th conference on electrical power
distribution networks (EPDC)
17. Ding F, Booth CD (2012) Protection and stability assessment in future distribution networks
using PMUs. In: 11th International conference on developments in power systems protection,
DPSP
18. Sánchez-Ayala G, Agüero JR, Elizondo D, Lelic M (2013) Current trends on applications of
PMUs in distribution systems. In: Proceedings of innovative smart grid technologies. IEEE,
Washington, DC, pp 1–6
19. Vipin Krishna R, Ashok S, Krishnan MG (2014) Synchronized phasor measurement unit. In:
Proceedings of IEEE international conference on power, signals, controls and computation,
Kerala, pp 1–6
20. Aminifar F, Shahidehpour M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Kamalinia S (2014) Power system
dynamic state estimation with synchronized phasor measurements. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas
63(2):352–363
21. Colangelo D, Zanni L, Pignati M, Romano P (2015) Architecture and characterization of a
calibrator for PMUs operating in power distribution systems. In: IEEE International
conference on PowerTech, Eindhoven, pp 1–6