Scribd
Upload
19 views

M C MEHTA v. UOI - ABSTRACT

The Supreme Court took notice of environmental pollution caused by stone crushing activities near Delhi, Faridabad, and Ballabgarh. While industrial development inevitably causes environmental changes, the court ruled that air, water, and land cannot be polluted to the point that it endangers people's health. Noting that citizens have a right to fresh air and a pollution-free environment under Article 21 of the constitution, the court ordered stone crushing units to stop operating in these areas and directed the government to relocate them to designated "crushing zones" within six months.

Uploaded by

SUSWANI
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
19 views

M C MEHTA v. UOI - ABSTRACT

The Supreme Court took notice of environmental pollution caused by stone crushing activities near Delhi, Faridabad, and Ballabgarh. While industrial development inevitably causes environmental changes, the court ruled that air, water, and land cannot be polluted to the point that it endangers people's health. Noting that citizens have a right to fresh air and a pollution-free environment under Article 21 of the constitution, the court ordered stone crushing units to stop operating in these areas and directed the government to relocate them to designated "crushing zones" within six months.

Uploaded by

SUSWANI
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

M C MEHTA (STONE CRUSHER REGULATION) V.

UNION OF INDIA
[1991 SCR (1) 866]
ABSTRACT:
The following is a brief Case analysis of the case M C Mehta (Stone crusher Regulation) v.
Union Of India [1991 SCR (1) 866]. In this case, the Supreme Court took note of environmental
pollution due to stone crushing activities in and around Delhi, Faridabad and Ballabgarh complexes.
The Court was conscious that environmental changes are the inevitable consequences of industrial
development in our country, but at the same time the quality of environment cannot be permitted to be
damaged by polluting the air, water and land to such an extent that it becomes a health hazard for the
residents of the area. Showing deep concern to the environment, the court reiterated, "Every citizen
has a right to fresh air and to live in pollution free environment." Thus, the Supreme Court once again
treated it as violation of Article 21 of the Constitution and passed the order in absolute terms under
Article 32 directing the stone crushing units to stop their activities in those areas. The Court further
directed the government to rehabilitate these stone crushers in "crushing zone" within the period of six
months.

You might also like