BCG Matrix Relative Market Share
BCG Matrix Relative Market Share
Given the following data, illustrate BCG Matrix and address final decision making:
BCG Matrix
Strategic Decision:
School of Business – This represent the universities’ best long-run opportunities for
growth and profitability. This school has a high relative market share and a high industry
growth rate thus should receive substantial investment to maintain or strengthen their
dominant positions. Forward, backward, and horizontal integration; market penetration;
market development; and product development are appropriate strategies for this
division to consider.
School of Education - This school in the university has a high relative market share
position but compete in a low-growth industry (school of education). This division
should be managed to maintain their strong position for as long as possible. Product
development or diversification may be attractive strategies for the school. However, as
the division becomes weak, retrenchment or divestiture can become more appropriate.
School of Science and Humanities – This school has low relative market share position
and compete in a slow- or no-market-growth industry. Because of the weak internal and
external position, the School of Science and Humanities can be liquidated, divested, or
trimmed down through retrenchment. In here, retrenchment can be the best strategy to
pursue because the school may bounce back, after strenuous asset and cost reduction,
to become viable, profitable divisions.
School of arts – This division in the university has a low relative market share position,
yet can compete in a high-growth industry. Generally the school has cash needs that are
high while the cash generation is low. In here, the university must decide whether to
strengthen the school by pursuing an intensive strategy (market penetration, market
development, or product development) or to sell them.