Future Mineral Processing Challenges Based On 45 Years of Applying Science and Engineering To Flotation
Future Mineral Processing Challenges Based On 45 Years of Applying Science and Engineering To Flotation
N. W. Johnson
Senior Principal Consulting Engineer, Mineralurgy Pty. Ltd.
and Adjunct Professor, JKMRC, SMI, University of Queensland
1
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Structure of Presentation
1. Future needs of an important methodology for mineral
separation analysis and process improvement
2
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Section 1
Future needs of an important methodology for mineral
separation analysis and process improvement
3
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Level 2*
Mineral recovery – size – liberation class relationships for separations
(Minerals necessary in item 1, not elements, to include liberation data)
Level 3
Can be complemented with surface analysis of relevant minerals
in the necessary size fractions/products
**A. Cameron, D. Kelsall, C. Restarick and P. Stewart, 1971. A detailed assessment of concentrator performance at Broken Hill
South Limited, Proc. AusIMM, 240:53-67.
4
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
N. W. Johnson and P. Munro, 2002. Overview of flotation technology and plant practice for complex
sulphide ores, Proceedings Mineral Processing Plant Design, Practice, and Control, SME, 1097-1123.
5
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
6
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Section 2
Future mineral processing challenges
8
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
9
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Wide range of feed sizes and resulting liberation values (100% class)
Groupings of sulphide minerals included e.g. PbS + ZnS + Iron Sulphides
Feed sizing (P80) typically 100 µm
Note decline in liberation values with increased feed coarseness, as expected
10
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Y axis: “initially recoverable” category for minerals or groupings (>15% sectional area)
Grouping based on “recoverable sulphides” of high interest (values high at coarse sizes)
Requires improved ability to recover coarse sulphide bearing particles (all sulphides
hydrophobic) with a flotation process. Gravity process or combinations also possible.
11
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
*Each halving of rougher feed P80 value requires 42% extra energy.
12
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
13
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Improvement in Concentrate
Quality – Future Challenges
Existing Sales Contracts
*Topic for a Keynote Address (P. Munro) at the MetPlant 2015 Conference in Perth
14
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
15
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
16
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Approaches to Improvement in
Concentrate Quality
Improve the position of the plant grade recovery curve:
17
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Differing requirements of the two major particle groups lost (conventional cells) –
fine fractions and coarse fractions are the “TROUBLESOME FRACTIONS”
18
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Coarser sizing,
same circuit
Note - Methods for direct measurement now exist; this new tool is
expected to be a major source of valuable new information and
insights leading to process improvements.
Current Situation
The Mineral Industry has no agreed standard procedures
for its quantification in a relative or an absolute fashion.
Future Challenge
A standard procedure needs to be developed (one possible
application given in next slide).
24
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
25
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Deliberate Flocculation
Potential applications exist in the literature:
26
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
R. Woods, 2010. Electrochemical aspects of sulfide mineral flotation, in Flotation Plant Optimisation
(ed. C. Greet), AusIMM Spectrum Series, No. 16, 123-135.
Y. Hu, W. Sun and D. Wang, 2009. Electrochemistry of Flotation of Sulphide Minerals, Tsinghua
University Press and Springer, 304 pp.
27
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Modified from:
N. W. Johnson, 1988. Application of
electrochemical concepts to four sulphide
flotation separations, Electrochemical
Soc. Conference on Electrochemistry in
Mineral and Metal Processing ll, Atlanta,
May.
28
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
29
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
30
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
31
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
32
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
33
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Note: Sewage plant effluent from a regional town/city can have total
organic carbon levels > 1000 ppm
34
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Section 3
Key learnings from the past for successfully addressing
processing challenges
35
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Property Example
36
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
37
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
38
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
39
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
41
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
42
Mineralurgy Pty Ltd
Acknowledgements
The Metallurgical Society of the AusIMM and the AusIMM
are thanked gratefully for the opportunity to deliver this
lecture.
43