Preparation of A National Environmentally Sound Management Plan For Pcbs and Pcb-Contaminated Equipment
Preparation of A National Environmentally Sound Management Plan For Pcbs and Pcb-Contaminated Equipment
Training Manual
ISBN : 92-1-158674-7
ISSN : 1020-8364
This Publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes
without special permission from the copyright-holder, provided that acknowledgement of the source is made.
UNEP and the Secretariat of the Basel Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any material that uses
this publication as a source.
No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior
permission in writing from UNEP.
E-mail : [email protected]
Web : www.basel.int
Preparation of a national environmentally sound
management plan for PCBs and PCB-contaminated
equipment in the context of the implementation
of the Basel Convention
Training Manual
Annexes
ii
1 – PCB awareness-raising module
The awareness-raising module contains technical information on PCBs and management related
issues during industrial use until their final elimination. Pilot programmes carried out in a
number of countries have demonstrated the considerable demand for information by both the
public and the private sectors. This module is also designed for the competent authorities and for
PCB owners and stresses their responsibility for ensuring the environmentally sound
management of PCBs. This demand for information is due to the fact that, historically, the
environmental repercussions of the industrial use of PCBs were not taken into account when
they were originally placed on the market.
Dielectric fluids
Transformers MOVEMENTS OF PCBs
Temporary storage
Capacitors IN THE ENVIRONMENT Permanent disposal
Microwave ovens
Air conditioning Temporary storage facilties
Electric motors High temperature incineration
Ballasts for electric lights Underground storage facilities
Electromagnets Chemical decontamination
Hydrogenation
Wastes
Inks
Lubricants
Waxes
Flame retarders
Adhesives
Surface coatings
Insulators
Pesticides
Dyes
Paints
Asphalts
Pipeline condensates
Plasticizers
Dielectric fluids in transformers and capacitors 60 %
Industrial and hydraulic fluids, gas turbines 15 %
Adhesives, textiles, printing works and pesticides 25 %
Additives in the preparation of insecticides, bactericides, etc. ND
• Austria, China, Czechoslovakia, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom
and United States.
In 1994 a European Commission study (DG XI) was carried out on the quantities of PCBs in
Europe. This study looked at the distribution of PCBs in each European Community country,
with a view to assessing the quantities of PCBs to be destroyed by 2010.
PCB wastes were grouped into 3 categories:
The study estimated the total quantity of liquid PCBs at 200,000 tons. These liquid PCBs
originate from existing transformers and capacitors, which are still awaiting destruction. France,
Germany and Italy head the league of PCB-holding countries, each having in excess of 40,000
tons, while Greece, Ireland and Portugal appear to have the smallest quantities.
The following table shows the quantity of liquid PCBs contained in transformers and capacitors,
country by country.
Liquid PCBs
Country Transformers Capacitors
Belgium 10 000 < 2000
France 45 000 >2500
Germany 30 000 12 000
United 3000 <6000
Kingdom
Ireland 100 <250
Spain 22 000 3000
Portugal 2500 500
Italy 45 000 <7000
Greece 2500 500
TOTAL » 160 000 » 33 000
Total quantity: 200,000 tons
Total quantity of solids: 400,000 tons
2
We provide below a breakdown of national PCB stocks as inventorized by Environment Canada
in 1993:
In use
Liquids in use containing askarel (with exception of ballasts 11 500 metric tons
for fluorescent tubes)
Equipment in use containing askarel – weight of voided 24 905 metric tons
appliances (in particular transformers and capacitors)
Contaminated mineral oil in use 2 161 metric tons
Transformers in use containing contaminated mineral oil – 7 130 metric tons
weight of voided appliances
Stored
Stored fluids containing askarel 6 265 metric tons
Stored equipment containing askarel (in particular, weight of 8 982 metric tons
drained appliances – transformers and capacitors)
Stored contaminated mineral oil 3 787 metric tons
Various stored PCB-containing wastes, of which • 95 718 tons of earth,
• 6 328 tons of ballasts,
• 1 582 tons of other voided
appliances and 4 364 tons
of sundry wastes totalling
107 992 metric tons
The total quantity of PCBs in Europe measures 160,000 tons, as against an available destruction
capacity of 68,000 tons.
3
Regulations in force in the industrialized countries:
United States:
Australia:
European Union:
Two primary uses: prior to 1975, PCBs formed part of the composition of many products.
Among their uses were:
• Bonds or plasticizers in varnishes, polishes, paints, inks, glues, copying paper, etc.;
• Also found in various other products, such as insecticides, packaging, lubricating and
cutting oils.
In addition, because of their considerable dielectric potential, their high heat absorption capacity
and their fire-resistant properties, they are used as:
4
• Distribution units;
• Insulation in very high voltage distribution units.
Octa-chloro-biphenyls
Reasons for restricting (in 1975) use of PCBs to closed applications only
Since 1966 scientists have noticed that PCBs are virtually indestructible and accumulate in
biological chains, thereby damaging the environment and people’s health. They are found at all
stages of the food chain and studies have revealed their presence, in particular, in the adipous
tissue of live species at the end of this chain: fish, seals, birds and, ultimately, humans. The
following levels of PCBs have been found in human adipous tissue:
5
In the light of these observations, it was only logical that PCB use should be restricted to closed
applications (with strict arrangements to ensure that there were no accidental releases into nature
and to recover, reclaim or destroy used PCBs, as well as the casing of equipment which
contained PCBs).
• PCBs are easily absorbed through all exposed areas and remain for the most part in fatty
tissue, where they tend to accumulate;
• More than 90% of ingested PCBs cross the intestinal walls and are retained in the organism;
• The organ favoured by PCBs is the liver, which stores them (the development of both malign
and benign tumours has been observed in mice which have absorbed PCBs and in monkeys,
whose sensitivity to these products is closest to that of humans, they cause:
In mice, the lethal dose 50 at eight days (i.e., the lethal dose for 50% of the population at the end
of eight days) is only 0.7 g of PCB per kg of the 'animal.
PCBs have been the cause of some spectacular poisonings. For instance, in 1968, in Yusho,
Japan, some 1,800 people fell ill with an unidentified disease. Thus took the form of rashes,
digestive and eye disorders, and numbness of the limbs. It took more than six months before it
was realized that this disease, which had already caused several deaths, was in fact a case of
serious mass poisoning caused by the consumption of PCB-contaminated rice oil. The PCBs had
leaked from a compressor and were present in a concentration of 2,000 ppm (ppm = part per
million; 2,000 ppm = 2 per thousand or 0.2%).
In 1979, following a comparable accident, 2,000 people were poisoned in Yu-Chen, Taiwan.
Poisoning of humans:
Studies of cases of poisoning caused by accidental absorption of doses measuring 800-1,000
mg/kg of PCB show that the first areas to show symptoms are the skin (acne, hyper-
pigmentation, keratosis, hypersudation) and the eyes (œdema of the eyelids, watering of the
eyes).
More general symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, weight-loss), liver disorders, bronchitis, certain
peripheral neuropathies and endocrine disruptions complete the clinical picture. These
symptoms recede after about a year.
6
Anomalies have been observed in the children of women who, during pregnancy, have
consumed PCB-contaminated oil. These anomalies are primarily found on the skin, in mucous
membrane and the epidermis.
Occupational exposure can cause irritations of the skin and the mucous membrane (eyes and
respiratory system), chloracne and, with stronger concentrations, liver disorders.
Carcinogenicity of PCBs
Epidemiological studies have shown no significant increase in the incidence of cancer among
people exposed to PCBs. Skin, digestive and liver tumours, and also instances of leukaemia,
have been attested, however, but scientific analyses have failed to establish a link between
increased skin and pancreatic cancer rates and occupational exposure of the victims to PCBs.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health
Organization (WHO), measures the carcinogenic risk of various chemicals and places them in
two groups:
In the United States, the threshold limit values for exposure to PCBs in the atmosphere of the
workplace have been set by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH) at:
Another agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
recommends a much lower limit value:
• 0.01 mg/m3.
When PCBs are broken down by heat, they produce – first and foremost – chlorine, hydrochloric
gas and carbon monoxide. Hydrochloric gas vapours can cause serious irritation of the
respiratory tracts, exposed skin areas, the mucous membrane (particularly of the eyes), resulting
in pharyngitis, laryngitis, bronchitis and inflammation of the eyes. In strong concentrations there
7
is a risk of acute pulmonary oedema. Therefore, a transformer which has been damaged should
never be sniffed. In the event of fire or decomposition, PCBs also produce, where oxygen is
present, small quantities of toxic compounds which belong to the family of furans and dioxins.
t = 1000 °C
+ O2
nCl nCl
PCDF
O
nCl nCl nCl
PCDD + O2
nCl nCl
PCDP
The precise identification of these products of decomposition is the subject of some debate: they
are actually divided up into a number of isomers – 212 in all – which are hard to distinguish and
the most toxic of which are the tetrachloride derivatives 2.3.7.8 TCDF and 2.3.7.8 TCDD.
It has long been thought that PCB-based electrical transformers represented a considerable step
forward from oil transformers, with their attendant fire hazard. Companies insuring against fire
and electrical accident risks granted discounts of up to 10 per cent of the rates charged for oil
transformers.
Furthermore, regulations covering public and high-rise buildings prohibited the use of
inflammable dielectrics such as oils. At the same time, as the restrictions on the installation of
PCB-insulated transformers were less rigorous than those imposed on apparatus insulated with
8
mineral oils, it was cheaper to use PCB-insulated transformers, even though the PCBs
themselves cost 25% more than the mineral oils:
• No need for fire protection: PCBs are non-inflammable – the fitting of firewalls and fire
extinguisher systems is not necessary;
• Reduction in the price of electrical cables and reduced mains electricity losses, since PCB
transformers can be fitted much closer to the use area, meaning that the low tension cables do
not need to be so long;
• Virtually no need for transformer maintenance as there is no periodic regeneration of
dielectrics.
PCB accidents
• Accidents involving purely mechanical defects in the electrical equipment, leading to a break
in the seal and leakage of PCBs from the casing, but without affecting the composition of the
dielectrics. Leaks come, for example, from the seal between the tank and its cover and from
rusty spots on the transformer’s cooling fan.
This type of accident results in the dispersion of PCBs, possibly over a wide area if the
apparatus has no retention system. It can occur with installed apparatus or when apparatus is
being transported. (e.g., when apparatus is being sent for destruction). Experience shows that
PCB contamination swiftly penetrates the soil and, in some cases, can even reach the
underground waters. The quantities involved are in the order of tens or hundreds of
kilograms. This is what is meant by “cold pollution”.
• Simple electrical accidents which result from electrical disorders caused by voltage surges
and insulation defects. The resulting electrical arc leads to the release of hydrochloric gas and
a build-up of pressure which causes the envelope to split and dielectrics to leak as liquid or as
spray.
The resulting dispersion of PCBs, more vigorous than in accidents of the first group, and the
formation of sprays cause contamination by emission. Considerable quantities of
hydrochloric acid may be formed and may even cause problems to emergency services. As
the PCBs break down in the absence of air, experts believe that there is little probability of
dioxins and furans forming.
• Accidents involving fire or the decomposition of PCBs in heat and in the presence of air. The
heat-based decomposition of PCBs in the presence of oxygen could cause PCDFs, PCDDs
and PCDPs1. Analyses of accidents abroad show a furan content considerably higher than
that of dioxins (by a factor of almost 100).
It should also be pointed out that the presence of the most toxic dioxin (2.3.7.8 TCDD) has
never been attested at detectable volumes, except in Binghamton (United States of America).
In accidents of this type, the dispersion of smoke and soot cause the contamination to spread
widely. Thus, in the recorded accidents, all the buildings concerned appear to have been
1
See annex X
9
contaminated at very different levels. The length of time the electrical fault lasted (the usual
presumed cause of accidents) seems to play an important role. Finally, there also appears to
be a correlation between the content of PCBs and PCDFs, with decomposition yields of 1%.
In accidents of this latter type, the term “hot pollution” is used.
• A voltage surge of atmospheric origin can cause arcing inside the transformer which would
normally be suppressed by the primary protection devices;
• A secondary voltage overload or a short-circuit in the main circuits could lead to significant
overheating and cause a fire (which, apparently, is what happened in Reims in January 1985).
These overloads should normally be picked up, however, and suppressed by upstream
protection devices, provided these have been fitted and adjusted in the prescribed manner.
The phenomena can be aggravated in the event of the mains power being automatically
switched back on, if the apparatus is not fitted with a primary protection device;
• Finally, the transformer can be damaged by a fire from another source.
The best known of the 40 or so which have been recorded around the world are those of
Binghampton and Reims, which starkly demonstrated the risks of pyrolysis contamination
caused by the use of PCB dielectrics.
Binghampton
In February 1981, in Binghampton, New York State, a fire swept through an 18-floor building –
the State Office Building – following a simple short-circuit in a circuit-breaker, which caused
the pyrolysis of a portion of 400 litres of PCBs held in a transformer vat. The smoke generated
by the fire was dispersed through the building’s ventilation system so that the entire building
was contaminated and had to be evacuated. Analyses showed PCB levels of 100,000-200,000
ppm.
Access to the building was prohibited except in sealed protective clothing and masks, and the
decontamination exercise, which lasted four years, cost US$ 30 million.
Reims
On 14 January 1985, an EDF 250 kVA transformer, insulated with PCBs, exploded in the
basement of a six-floor block of flats, in Reims. Because of the extreme cold (-24° C), the
transformer was operating under excessive strain and was being drawn on to an estimated load
of 360 kVA. The fire resulting from the explosion was swiftly brought under control by the fire
service, but the thick black smoke spread up the stairwell, the waste disposal chute and the
ventilation ducts to all the floors, necessitating the evacuation of the building. Several days later,
the formation of certain contaminants was noted and only a highly specialized laboratory was
able to identify these, because of the very low toxicity thresholds.
10
1.3 - Current development of technology and regulations
• From 1 July 1986 the placing on the market (including the second-hand market) of such PCT
or PCT-impregnated equipment, capacitors, inductors, etc., is prohibited;
• From 1 July 1986 the use of PCBs and PCTs heat-transmitting fluids in new in closed-circuit
heat-transfer installations or as hydraulic fluids, for new underground mining equipment, is
prohibited.
• Defines as PCBs (or PCTs) all preparations with a PCB or PCT content higher than 0.01%
(100 parts per million) by weight;
• The use of equipment, plant and fluids which were in service on 30 June 1986 continued to
be authorized, however, until they were disposed of or reached the end of their service life.
Regulations
• Equipment: Owners of transformers, capacitors, etc., which have been insulated with PCBs
must declare this equipment;
• Accidents: Obligation to declare any accidents to the classified installations inspectorate (or
equivalent authority);
• Verification: Inspections necessary to establish whether or not installations conform with the
regulations;
• Retrofitting: Moving installation to another site. This requires a new declaration. The new site
is considered as a new installation.
PCBs have long been classified with aromatic halogenated compounds and, as such, have been
subject to the regulations governing this family of products. In the absence of any instructions
specific to PCBs, the following instruments apply:
Inland transport
• Regulations covering the transport of dangerous goods by rail, road or inland navigation
vessels;
• Regulations covering the transport and handling of dangerous goods in maritime ports;
• Regulations covering the transport by air of dangerous goods;
• Regulations covering the transport by sea of dangerous goods; under the IMCO code.
11
How to know whether or not a transformer contains PCBs
Normally, the properties of the dielectrics are stated on the appliance’s identification plate. As a
rule, since 1975, PCB-impregnated appliances are very clearly labelled, in indelible print on a
yellow background.
But if the equipment was installed before 1975, it may not have any labels. If there is no other
clear indication, PCBs can be identified by their colourless or yellowish appearance, their
characteristic smell and their density of about 1.5, as against 0.85-0.9 for oils: they can be
identified by a density test. Failing this, there are other methods for screening PCBs.
These regulations are designed, above all, to ensure better safety in accordance with the
following four principles:
• Protection against environmental spills and the fitting of appropriate retention devices;
• Protection of equipment against the danger of internal electrical faults which may cause an
accident or a fire;
• Protection against external fire risks to which the equipment might be exposed;
• Special precautionary measures to be taken during on-the-spot maintenance, regeneration or
repair of the equipment.
PCB substitutes
Although the purpose of the new regulations is eventually to eliminate totally the use of PCBs, it
is still preferable not to rush into a systematic and a priori conversion of all PCB-containing
equipment. On the one hand, this operation poses the problem of the removal and destruction, at
one time, of all the existing equipment and, on the other, that of replacing this equipment with
other, equally reliable, appliances. When the state of an appliance or its dielectrics necessitates
its replacement, two possibilities may be considered:
This involves draining the PCB-based liquid and then decontaminating the appliance and
refilling it with another dielectric. The substitute must be totally compatible with the type of
appliance and all the materials used in its manufacture.
Among the dielectrics currently being suggested for this purpose, mineral oils are the easiest to
use. In all cases, the choice must only be made after a careful comparative study of the risks and
after consulting the equipment’s manufacturer.
Changing the liquid is a delicate operation, presenting the risk of PCBs escaping into the
environment. For that reason it must only be carried out by duly authorized companies.
If the decontamination process cannot guarantee that the new liquid will have a PCB content
below 0.05 ppm throughout its service life, because – among other reasons – of the impregnation
of the components by PCBs, the appliance must be subject to the same regulatory restrictions as
those containing PCB-based liquids, namely, labelling, prevention measures, elimination. The
12
labelling prescribed by the regulations should include the trade name and the properties of the
new liquid and it would also be advisable to give the date on which it started operating with the
substitute liquid.
Note: Sand with a PCB content of between 10 and 50 ppm is generally disposed of in approved
industrial waste landfills or kept in confinement storage.
Mains electricity
Very high voltage 400 000 volts Long distance and international
lines: 400 000 volts transport of electrical power
High voltage lines 90 000 volts Transport of electrical power for
heavy industry
High voltage lines 63 000 volts Railways
Medium voltage 30 000 volts Transport of electrical power for
local industries, small and medium
enterprises, services,
Low voltage 380 volts, Electricity supply to households
230 volts and workshops
13
STRUCTURE OF THE POWER SUPPLY NETWORK
Chemicals
factory
Individual
house
Port
Store
Service
Factory station
Flats
Airport
The mains network consists of metal cables, which are imperfect conductors of electricity. When
very powerful electrical currents pass along these cables, a portion of the energy being
transported is transformed into heat by the joule effect and lost. To limit such electricity losses,
the intensity of the current must be reduced and, by corollary, the voltage at the terminals of the
line must be increased. Lowering the intensity of the current means that lighter-weight cables
can be used and the line’s construction costs may be reduced. Lighter cables can be supported by
lighter pylons, with less visual impact on the environment. Transformers are used to increase the
voltage at the power-station outlets, while other transformers, situated near the area where the
electricity is to be used, lower this voltage.
Electrical transformers
14
The quantities of dielectric contained in the transformers is directly dependant on the
transformer’s capacity. The following rule can be applied to estimate this quantity of electricity:
Quantities of dielectric
15
courbe KVA / pds PCB
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
Série1
1000
Série2
800
600
400
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
The magnetic circuit is totally immersed in the dielectric. After 20 and more years of use, all the
porous materials in the magnetic circuit are impregnated with dielectric. These porous materials
include the following:
• The wooden chocks, which absorb 50% of their own weight (thus, a block weighing
10 kg can absorb up to 5 kg of dielectric);
• Insulating cardboard and paper;
• Resins coating the copper wires.
Statistics compiled on the decontamination of transformers show that 5% of the initial PCB
content on manufacture is impregnated into the transformer’s porous components. Thus, a
transformer with a total weight of 1,500 kg is made up of:
10 %: 150 kg of tank (metal mass)
60 %: 900 kg of magnetic circuit
30 %: 450 kg of dielectrics
of which 5% of the dielectrics are impregnated in the magnetic circuit – 5% of 450 kg, or 22.5
kg of PCBs. If this quantity is presented as a ratio of the dielectric mass in a PCB transformer,
the PCB constitute a weight ratio of 22.5 kg / 900 kg, or a contamination level of 25,000 ppm.
Given that the maximum level allowed is 50 ppm, this is 500 times higher than the norm.
Accordingly, the entire metal parts should be considered as PCB wastes and should be destroyed
on the basis as the PCBs themselves.
The procedure for the destruction of these metal parts consists in decontaminating them – i.e.,
extracting the PCBs contained in their metallic and porous components.
16
DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIALS
IN A TRANSFORMER
EXPANSION TANK
MAGNETIC SHEETS
COOLING
RADIATORS
DIELECTRIC
OIL / PCBs
30% of total weight
It should be noted that mineral oil transformers can be contaminated by PCBs. This
contamination has two causes:
1 – Using PCBs to top up the oil in appliances. Because of their technical advantages and the
ease with which they mix with mineral oils, PCBs have actually been used as a supplement to
dielectrics. PCB detection tests carried out in various countries on the transformers of electricity
supply networks when those being scrapped have shown contamination (> 50 ppm) levels of the
order of 30-40% of the surveyed equipment. The dielectric of these transformers is therefore
considered as a PCB waste and should be incinerated in a PCB-approved facility.
2 – Retrofilling of PCB transformers with mineral oil. This operation consists in draining the
transformer of its dielectric and refilling if with PCBs. Given the impregnation potential of
PCBs, particularly in the porous parts of the transformer, i.e., the wood of the chocking blocks,
the cardboard and the resins, these impregnated PCBs gradually leach back into the replacement
mineral oil. The photograph below shows, left, a wooden chock and, right, the quantity of PCBs
extracted by vacuum suction.
17
A wooden chock can contain up to 70% of its own weight in PCBs. The leaching back of these
PCBs can continue for up to three years before stabilizing. As an example, a 630 kVA
transformer which may contain 20 kg of wooden chocking blocks, will, over time, release 70%
of its weight, i.e., some 14 kg, as PCBs which leach back. This explains the PCB contamination
in retrofilled transformers at concentration levels which can be as high as 10,000 ppm, or 6 kg of
PCB to every 600 kg of dielectrics.
• Likelihood that the appliance will cause fire in the event of a fault;
• Behaviour of the appliance in a fire which originates from a source other than
the appliance itself;
• Toxicity to humans and the environment of the insulating materials;
• Toxicity, corrosiveness and opacity of the smoke released in the event of a fire;
• Cost of the appliance and its installation;
• Congestion;
• Noise;
• Possibility of its destruction, etc.
An exhaustive discussion of all the possible approaches lies beyond the scope of this manual.
Furthermore, the data gathered on the various replacement products raise a number of questions
and, in some cases, require a more detailed knowledge of the appliances and their component
parts.
A table summarizing the main advantages and disadvantages of replacement is provided below.
There is no all-purpose solution to the problem of replacing PCB-based transformers. Each user
must select, from among the products on the market, the one which best meets the specific
requirements in hand.
18
Type of Disadvantages Advantages Comments
dielectric
Mineral oils Fire hazard Only slightly toxic and well- Need to have a
known liquid disposal pit or
Cheapest of the liquid similar system
dielectrics
Heavy oils • Higher viscosity, necessitating special Mineral oil Need to have a
arrangements for cooling the transformer disposal pit or
• Dielectric rigidity less than with normal oils similar system
Not widely
available on
market
Silicon oils • Unsatisfactory operation in fire Non-toxic liquid Need to have a
• Relatively high coefficient of expansion, disposal pit or
necessitating a special tank similar system
• High viscosity
• Decomposition produces noxious substances
(presence of silica)
• Must be protected from humidity
• Non biodegradable
Impregnated • High price, depending on type of insulation • Non-pollutant More bulky than
transformers • Behaviour in fire varies depending on technical • Low quantity of a liquid dielectric
specifications combustible products in transformer
• Very sensitive to pollution and humidity the event of fire
• Needs an outer casing • Possibility of rapid cooling
• Noise level may be on the high side
Encased • High price • Non-pollutant Need to verify
transformers • Decomposition may produce toxic substances • Very good resistance to performance
(applies to certain resins laden with amino- humidity and to pollution under overload
products) • Possibility of rapid cooling conditions
• Noise level may be high Need to conduct
reaction tests
Bulkier than
liquid dielectric
transformer
Esters Good dielectric properties Not easily inflammable Subject to same
Risk of attacking aluminium on coils Non-irritant rules as mineral
Need to protect from humidity oil
NF formula Not compatible with aluminium and zinc Non-inflammable Halocarbonated
Good dielectric properties liquid
19
Capacitors containing PCBs
The size of these capacitors varies a great deal, from that of an ice-cube to that of a refrigerator.
They can often de identified by the letters “kvar” on their identification plate. These letters show
the electrical classification of the capacitor, which usually lies between 5 and 200 kVar. In
practice, all capacitors manufactured between 1930 and 1977 as substitutes for dielectric liquid
contain PCBs.
ceramic
insulation
paper/alum.
casing
condenser
case
Purpose of capacitors
The light ballast ensures that the correct voltage is supplied for the operation of a fluorescent
light. The PCB-containing capacitors in these ballasts are usually encased in an asphalt
compound placed in a steel case inside the fluorescent light. These capacitors have two electric
terminals at the end of a hermetically sealed metal case. A conventional capacitor used in an
office fluorescent light contains about 25 grams of PCB. The PCB capacitors used in high-
intensity lights contain between 91 and 386 grams of PCB. Since 1978 these fluorescent lamp
ballasts have been manufactured without PCBs.
20
2 – PCB inventory methods
2.1 – Applying inventory modalities and resources
PCBs have been used in two different applications: closed and open systems. The inventory process
referred to here relates only to closed system PCBs. Different investigation methods are followed with
open applications involving environmental releases and these do not apply to closed applications.
These investigations apply to such phenomena as concentrations of PCBs in the ecosystem (sediments,
phytoplancton, zooplancton, mammal marine animals, food chain, etc.).
• To list all PCB owners and the current quantities of the PCBs;
• To ensure that PCB appliances can be braced up to the time of their final destruction.
• Gathering information;
• Using information contained in a database.
It is therefore essential that all the concepts employed are clearly defined in advance:
In addition, the available information sources and the investigation methods must be identified:
• Site inspections;
• Questionnaires.
The last stage of the inventory is the processing of the results, with a view to setting in place:
• Appropriate regulations;
• An elimination plan;
• Monitoring of all existing stocks until their final elimination.
21
2.2 – Definitions
Definition of PCBs
The Basel Convention has defined PCBs as any substance or material with a PCB concentration
of above 50 ppm. Unidentified appliances must be presumed to be PCB-containing pending their
identification by screening or laboratory analysis. This definition is important because it
includes:
Particular attention should be given to mineral oil transformers. Pilot programmes have revealed
a significant lack of information on this class of appliances and it is therefore strongly
recommended that the awareness of managers is raised of the historic causes of the
contamination of mineral oil-insulated transformers.
For surface contamination, such as walls contaminated in an explosion, the following should be
taken into account:
Sampling by the scratching method will ascertain which type of contamination is involved.
The PCB owner is the individual or legal entity who holds on his property and for his own use
electrical PCB-containing appliances.
An inventory card can be prepared on the basis of one or several model cards and adapted to the
specific conditions of each country. An example of an inventory card is given in annex I.
The “PCB inventory and management ” tool, developed by the Secretariat of the Basel
Convention to assist decision-makers, suggests that the information required should be arranged
under four headings: “Identification”, “Technical specifications”, “Safety”, “Analysis”, and
“Elimination”. Details of these categories are provided in annex II.
The information gathered is designed to meet the needs of the inventory itself and also to be fed
into a database for a programme for the management of operational PCB sources (transformers,
capacitors, drums of liquids and drums of solids) until their final destruction. Ultimately, the
inventory questionnaire is based on the following two principles:
22
• Principle of the mandatory declaration of ownership of PCBs;
• Principle of traceability until final elimination.
Under this framework, the PCB owner becomes a waste generator. Given this production of
waste, he is responsible until the equipment and its contents are destroyed.
The two most interesting, however are the open flask fire point index and the oxygen index.
• The fire point, or the temperature to which the substance must be heated, in an open
container, for a small flame to ignite and to continue to burn spontaneously, gives an
indication of the risk of accidental fire. PCBs do not have a fire point measurable below
boiling, and this precisely is the current definition of a non-inflammable dielectric;
• The oxygen index, or the necessary initial oxygen content, in a mixture of nitrogen and
oxygen, to sustain the combustion of a previously ignited liquid dielectric, gives an indication
of the likelihood of self-extinguishment in the case of an outside fire. PCBs have a very high
oxygen index, which means a high capacity to self-extinguish does not exist.
• To define a PCB elimination plan in accordance with several criteria, such as dilapidation,
priority sites, PCB concentrations, geographical distribution, etc.
23
The primary purpose of these statistics is to assist in the preparation of a national elimination
plan. The statistics to be gathered are the following:
• Public sector: The classified installations inspectorate, or equivalent service, may have lists
of the sites of PCB transformer owners, in view of the possible dangers of their ownership.
• Private sector:
• First and foremost, the electricity generating and supply companies, which have client
files. These files do not specify whether or not the clients run PCB transformers, but
they do contain the addresses of the owners and the date of the installations. The
deadline of 1985 could be maintained, even though it post-dates the prohibition;
• Second, the supervisory agencies, which make regular audits of the installations and
which are obliged to inform the installation owners if PCBs are manifest;
• Repair companies also have useful information.
The conduct of site visits is essential for the gathering of observations. One hitch to be avoided
is making the inspection visit part of some compulsory regulations, which will often cause the
visit to be refused. The owner must be left an entirely free hand to volunteer his services, while
impressing on him the importance of his participation in the compilation of a national inventory
of PCB stocks. A letter must be sent to the owner in advance of any visit, notifying him of its
date.
24
Communication with those in charge of installations
• Overalls;
• Shoes;
• Plastic gloves;
• Safety goggles;
• Lamp;
• Gas mask;
• Notebook, pens;
• Camera;
• Sampling flasks.
Safety considerations
Equipment inspection
2
This recommendation forms part of preparation of an inventory to determine the total stock of PCB-containing
equipment, regardless of its concentration.
25
• Take a 10 ml beaker;
• Pour a little water in the beaker;
• Pour a little of the dielectric into the beaker;
If the “oil” phase precipitates to the bottom of the beaker, its density is greater than 1. This
means that it most certainly contains more than 50 ppm of PCB and there is no need to continue
the tests.
If the “oil” phase remains above the water, this means that it is mineral oil, as its density is
below 1, but further tests should be conducted to ascertain whether the oil has been
contaminated with PCBs (phase 4).
• If the test is affirmative, this means that the PCB level is above 50 ppm. But this test is not in
itself sufficient to determine the contamination level. Move on to phase 5.
• If the test is negative, the transformer may be classified as below 50 ppm, and therefore
“non-PCB”.
26
Example of negative test: Dark colour Example of affirmative
test: Light colour
The advantages of this apparatus are that its analytical capability is much higher than that of gas
chromatography (CPG) and it is much cheaper: about $10 per screening as against $35 with
CPG.
27
Standards Association (AFNOR) and ISO standards) must be followed if reliable results are to
be obtained. Control tests have been made on similar mineral oil samples contaminated by PCBs
in several laboratories already set up to work with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry.
The results of these varied between 1 and 10. There is clearly a great need for a tailor-made
validation system for the screening of mineral oils for PCBs.
This is compiled directly from the data and can be undertaken after a visit to the firm in
question. The technical recommendations given below apply to retrofitting measures for
equipment to ensure the sound environmental management of PCBs.
24 Drums must be stored under safe conditions, with no inflammable liquid in the
vicinity, and must be labelled PCBs;
28 PCB transformers must be declared to the competent authorities;
29 Possession of PCB transformers must be declared to the competent authorities;
31 If the transformer has been retrofilled, the oil from the transformer must be analysed
to determine its PCB content;
33 If the dielectric has not been identified it must be analysed;
39 The transformer must be stored under safe conditions;
40 The transformer must be stored under safe conditions;
41 A PCB label must be visible on the transformer;
42 If not, a PCB label must be attached to the wall of the workshop where the
transformer is located;
43 A PCB label must be placed outside the premises;
44 A PCB alarm must be in operation on the appliance as well as inside and outside the
workshop;
46 The volume of the catch basin must be greater than the quantity of PCB contained in
the transformer (PCB density: 1.5 - vol = wt/density);
47 A catch basin must be installed below the transformer;
50 The period of time between inspections should be reduced for safety reasons;
51 Inspections should be carried out in accordance with the age of the transformer;
53 The level should be checked during each inspection;
55 The insulation should be checked during each inspection;
57 Regular analysis is recommended to ascertain the dielectric properties of the fluid;
59 This safety device is strongly recommended for PCB transformers;
62 This safety device is strongly recommended for PCB transformers;
65 If the PCB concentration is greater than 50 ppm, the transformer must be declared to
the competent authorities as a PCB transformer;
66 The dielectric must be sampled to ascertain its PCB content;
68 Test recommended to ascertain the dielectric properties of the fluid;
70 Test recommended to ascertain the dielectric properties of the fluid;
71 Either the PCB transformer is replaced by a mineral oil transformer or a fire-wall
must be erected between the two appliances;
73 Connections to the air conditioning system must be sealed;
76 Ventilation of the workshop must be sufficient to cope with the release of toxic gas
should the need arise;
78 It is recommended that access be restricted to authorized personnel;
79 Repair work to the transformer is necessary;
Contaminated material must be removed and a decontamination inspection carried
81 out and a report submitted to the competent authorities;
28
84 If the PCB level is greater than 50 ppm, a gas chromatography analysis must be
carried out;
85 A PCB check must be made and the result transmitted to the competent authorities.
A risk diagnosis is drawn up for each of the sources listed. This is compiled from information
contained in the database. The competent authority can decide on specific measures according to
the combined criteria of safety and maintenance. The criteria used in the framework for the
preparation of risk diagnosis may be weighed.
29
3 – Use of statistical data
The inventory data will be set out and processed to provide quantified information on the main
trends observable from national surveys. Statistics can thus be worked out for the following
issues:
This information will help in the realization of the two principal objectives of the report, which
are the preparation of a regulatory framework and the formulation of a national management
plan.
distributionby
distribution bytype
type of
of business
business
35
% by type of business
30
25
20
Series1
15
10
5
0
5
15
17
20
24
27
62
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
01
11
26
29
40
90
type of
type of business
business
This data is interesting in that they can be used in preparing an overall diagnosis to guide
decisions relating, where applicable, to preventative measures to be taken in certain sectors of
activity where PCBs present specific risks, as for example public places:
• Schools;
• Restaurants;
• Hospital environment;
• Administrative offices;
• Others.
This classification is useful in the drawing up of a population graph showing the number of
appliances which have reached scrapping age at any given period of time.
30
PCBPCB breakdownby
breakdown byage
age in
in %
%
30
25
25 23
% over population
20
20 17
15 12 Series2
10
5 2 1 0
0
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 1
Age
The peak of the graph corresponds to transformers installed in 1985, the year when PCBs were
made the subject of control in industrialized countries.
Quantity of
Quantity ofPCBs/yr
PCBs/ yr
800
700
Quantity in tons
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
year
Using the quantity of existing supplies and the date at which the appliances are to be scrapped, a
destruction graph for the period in question can be worked out as things stand, the destruction
period will last until 2013.
31
140'000
Q DESTRUCTION TONS/YR 120'000
100'000
80'000
Series1
60'000
40'000
20'000
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013
YEARS
breakdown by capacity
breakdown by capacity
35
30
25
20
%
15
10
5
0
60
100
160
200
250
400
500
630
800
1000
1250
1500
2000
5000
10000
20000
capacity in kVA
Using data from the laboratory analysis of PCBs and contaminated oils, a more focused study
will establish the distribution of known PCBs by concentration levels. This information will be
particularly useful in deciding priorities and identifying the most suitable technologies in
accordance with known quantities and concentrations at the national level. The implementation
of concentration measures for the stock as a whole will, however, be an expensive exercise.
The database is designed to be brought up to date using information which the owners are
required by law to provide, including:
32
The diagram given below illustrates the tasks performed by the database in assisting the
accredited organizations to manage the national stock of PCB-containing equipment, by
ensuring follow-up throughout their service life3. It is therefore possible:
• To coordinate the preparation of a national inventory of PCBs;
• To ensure the personalized follow-up of appliances and batches of PCBs (and listed
establishments), to send leaflets to the owners concerning the retrofitting of their listed
installations, and to update them on information about these installations;
• To ensure the follow-up of PCBs at all stages, from the point when they are put to use, to
their storage and final elimination;
• To compile a body of local or national statistics on PCBs;
• To provide useful information for the preparation of a national PCB management plan.
Elimination
plan
PCB stock
management
Appliances file
retrofitting
of
installations
Regulations
Mailing
3
A basis of this kind has been prepared by the Basel Convention Secretariat and is at the disposal of all
Convention parties.
33
4 – Preparation of a national PCB management plan: Preliminary elements
The data gathered in the inventory will help in the elaboration of a national plan for the
environmentally sound management of PCBs. This plan will define government policy on the
issue and will deal with the following aspects:
A national PCB management strategy will pursue the following basic objectives:
PCB phase-out
Eliminate all measurable discharges of PCBs into the environment, starting with enclosed areas,
and work steadily towards the suppression of all PCB use likely to cause a discharge that might
be impossible to contain. A PCB phase-out strategy must take into account risks to human health
and the environment, as well as economic and technical factors.
4
The finer details of the preparation of the financial plan will not be dealt with in this chapter (see chapter 8
entitled “Financial tools for the management and destruction of PCBs”).
5
See the Basel Convention technical guidelines on wastes comprising or containing PCBs, PBBs, PCTs
(first version 1992, Draft new version, 2002).
34
4.1.2 – Guiding principles for a national strategy
There are important principles guiding not only the implementation of a national management
plan for PCBs but also its preparation. These principles apply to all the issues arising from PCB
management.
The national plan will apply the safety principle, as strictly as is necessary, according to
available resources and the national capacity for implementation. Too strict an application of the
safety principle could contribute to the failure of the national plan.
An environmentally sound plan for the management of PCBs does not have to centre on their
destruction. The presence of PCBs in electrical installations is actually a safety factor from the
technical viewpoint. The exceptional dielectrical qualities of this fluid, particularly its thermal
and chemical stability, have helped provide ways of dealing with inflammable fluids.
Consequently, a gradual phase-out of PCBs is proposed, backed up by administrative and
technical monitoring of PCB-containing equipment, to be carried out by duly authorized bodies.
The management plan must take account of the need for storage of scrapped appliances that are
awaiting elimination. Such systems as the recycling of ferrous and non-ferrous metals and the
collecting of used oil have traditionally been key links in the re-processing chain of these
products without, however, any consideration being given to the environmental repercussions of
their PCBs. The “market value” of these products is another contributory factor in the release of
PCBs into the environment. A case in point is the production of copper through the open-air
burning, fuelled by used tyres, of magnetic circuits from transformers. Up to 20% of a
transformer can consist of copper, worth $1,000 per ton.
Potential problems are posed by the recycling of PCB liquids, for example, for use as a fuel
substitute. This would mean mixing PCBs with motor oil. The level of dilution in such cases
35
could mean that concentrations were kept below 50 ppm, but the PCB mass would remain the
same and combustion would bring about the production of dioxins (PCDD) and furans (PCDF).
The management plan should also prioritize pollution risks. Several countries have included
priority criteria in their regulations applicable to the elimination of transformers that are more
than 35 years old and need replacing immediately. Another risk factor concerns the location of
the transformer. There are certain public locations where measures should be taken to remove
transformers. Locations where elimination is of a high priority include:
Regulatory policy
The plan must be underpinned by the regulatory framework of national and international
obligations. For the most part, implementation of the plan will be driven by international
agreements and obligations6. PCB management, for example, including the monitoring of any
possible transboundary movements, must be carried out in accordance with recognized
international norms and obligations, especially the control systems set up by the Basel
Convention.
The possession and use of PCB transformers and capacitors at the national level must be subject
to regulations that will control their impact on the environment. These regulations shall
stipulate:
Certain countries feel that a system of regulations is the best long-term guarantee of the gradual
phasing out of PCBs. It gives a shared sense of responsibility to everyone involved as well as
defining their individual areas of responsibility. It also ultimately allows for recourse to
measures. Regulations, however, can only be effective to the extent that the parties involved
have the capacity to implement them. In some cases they can even produce negative results as
when, for example, they bring a given problem to the awareness of the owners without offering
any real solutions.
6
In this context, see, in annex XI below, the articles and annexes of the Stockholm Convention which are
relevant to PCB management.
36
Some operations involving stocktaking and the final elimination of limited quantities of PCBs
have been very successfully carried out entirely without recourse to any regulatory framework.
These operations have been successful because they have comprised projects focused on specific
objectives and totally funded by external sources. This kind of operation, however, is limited in
terms of its timespan and scope.
This raises the question of which technologies to choose for the treatment and elimination of
PCBs. To this end, individual countries can develop a national mechanism for identifying and
choosing suitable procedures, techniques and technologies for PCB management. These
countries can also use the tools placed at their disposal by the Basel and Stockholm conventions
which are relevant to the final elimination of PCB wastes.
In this context, once the technical options have been chosen, national needs (or, possibly,
regional needs, such as the principle of regional integration set out below) must be satisfied in
the following areas:
• Treatment capacity;
• Treatment costs;
• Environmental impact.
Treatment capacity must be commensurate with the amount of PCBs to be destroyed within a
given period, bearing in mind that while the capacity is technically linear the needs are not, as
can be seen in the population graphs for transformers in current use. One could reasonably
expect that these installations will keep on functioning for more than ten years since the most
recent PCB-containing transformers will become obsolete around 2015-2020.
To enable potential installations to operate to full capacity and to compensate for the variation in
destruction capacity needs, a possible solution could be the erection of temporary storage
facilities. A design for a temporary storage module is proposed in chapter VI.
With regard to the decontamination of solid sections of the transformer, one possible solution
would be the setting up of decontamination workshops by developing suitable technological
partnerships. Ultimately these mobile PCB-destruction plants, together with other technology
already available on the market or still at various stages of development and implementation,
could all be considered in the overall evaluation of national (and regional) technical plans.
7
For this subject see the publication “Guidance in developing national and/or regional strategies for the
Environmentally Sound Management of Hazardous Wastes”, Basel Convention Highlights No. 96/001,
Geneva, November 1997.
37
The first of these is the “proximity principle”, according to which the elimination of hazardous
wastes must be carried out at a location as close as possible to the production site of the said
wastes, even though it may be more economical and environmentally friendly to treat certain
wastes in specialized centres situated some distance from the waste production site.
Another is the “self-sufficiency principle”, according to which each country has to ensure that
the elimination of wastes produced on its territory must be carried out using environmentally
sound management methods, again while conceding that it may be more economical and
environmentally friendly to treat certain wastes abroad. This principle should be applied with
due regard for the principle of the development and transfer of the technology referred to above.
The third is the “principle of least transboundary movement”, according to which the
transboundary movement of hazardous wastes is kept to a bare minimum, while the efficient and
environmentally sound management of these wastes is still ensured.
In applying these principles to PCB management it must be recognized that the current
infrastructure of PCB management in developing countries has some bearing on decision-
making. With few exceptions, these countries do not possess the necessary infrastructure either
for the treatment of contaminated equipment or for the destruction of PCBs. In any event, PCB
stocks in most of the countries concerned are relatively small, and below the critical volume that
would justify the creation of national infrastructures for treatment and elimination. In view of
these considerations, the responsible national officials are encouraged to explore the different
technical and technological choices, in accordance with the principles cited above, at both
regional and subregional levels.
In certain circumstances the principle of regional (or subregional) integration presents certain
advantages in technical, regulatory and financial terms for the group of countries involved in
such integration. As for the PCB management methods in use within the regions, it should be
noted that the PCB-containing wastes are limited in quantity and in lifespan. Consequently, the
needs for a PCB management infrastructure must be weighed within the overall framework of
hazardous waste management. There are also grounds to expect that, if those areas that lack the
necessary technology delay the implementation of PCB-containing waste management until they
obtain that technology, the consequent risks to health and the environment could be perpetuated.
Below we list the guiding principles referred to above as applied to the development of a
national PCB management plan:
• Stocktaking:
• Maintenance of equipment:
38
• Technical aspects:
• Financial aspects:
An initial and vital step in the national strategy will be the preparation and implementation of
national regulations covering the whole body of issues referred to previously – namely, the
management of PCB-containing equipment in use up to final elimination on the basis of the life-
cycle principle.
For the purposes of designing and implementing such regulations, a working group must be set
up to ensure that the regulation modalities take due account of the various technical and
financial constraints affecting those involved, particularly in the public and the private sector.
Draft regulations are proposed in chapter VII of the present manual. These regulations will cover
all the environmental aspects related to the possession and use of PCBs:
• Area of application;
• Definitions;
• Inventories;
• Maintenance of PCB-containing equipment and accident prevention;
• Prevention;
• Final elimination of PCBs and decontamination of scrapped appliances;
• Emergency plan in case of accidents;
• Norms and standards of management, analysis and treatment;
• Monitoring and decontamination of sites.
The following section briefly describes the different regulatory phases of a national PCB
management plan and suggests scenarios for a regulatory approach.
The owners of any appliance with a volume of PCBs in excess of 5 dm3 are required to declare
their possession of it to the competent authorities of the administrative region in which the
appliance is located within X months of the publication of the decree. With electrical capacitors
the threshold of 5 dm3 is relative to the aggregate PCB volume of an entire plant. The
declaration must contain the following information8:
8
See the PCB declaration form in annex I.
39
• Date and type of treatment or substitution carried out or planned;
• Date of declaration.
The competent regional authority, working on the basis of the declarations referred to in article 1
above, shall draw up, within X months of the publication of the decree, local inventories of
scrapped appliances to be forwarded to the competent national authorities with a view to the
establishment of a national inventory of stocks.
This national inventory will be kept up-to-date by the competent national authority so as to
ensure that the whole body of PCB-containing appliances can undergo regular follow-up
inspections in accordance with the plan set out in section 4.3.8.9
Appliances itemized in the course of the inventory exercise referred to in section 4.3.2 above
must be labelled by their owner. A similar label should be attached to the doors of the site where
the appliance is kept (see details in annex III).
Dispensation from the provisions of sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 can be made in the cases of
appliances containing a liquid volume of between 500 ppm and 50 ppm of the substances
referred to in section 4.3.1. These appliances will be labelled “PCB contamination less than 500
ppm”. Specific provisions must be made for the presence of PCB-containing appliances within a
range of mineral oil appliances as this situation presents increased risk.
On the basis of the national inventory exercise referred to in section 4.3 above, the ministry in
charge of PCB management (e.g. the focal point of the Basel Convention) must draw up a draft
technical plan for the decontamination and elimination of listed appliances within a designated
period of X months from the publication of the decree.
This draft plan provides a timetable for the elimination of PCBs and the elimination or
decontamination of listed PCB-containing appliances, which would guarantee elimination or
decontamination by a designated date (before 2005 at the latest), with the exception of
transformers that have a liquid content of between 500 ppm and 50 ppm of the substances in
question, which are to be eliminated at the end of their working life. It also makes provision for
ways of keeping to the timetable. Furthermore, it lists the methods for collecting and eliminating
other, non-listed PCB-containing appliances reaching the end of their working lives, including
household appliances.
Possible technical solutions (procedures and technologies) to the problem of waste management
should be systematically and comprehensively explored, taking into account economic, social
and environmental criteria (prevention of toxic emissions, controlled management of discharges,
etc.). In this context, the technical directives developed under the various international bodies
(e.g., Basel and Stockholm conventions) can provide methodological tools that will be useful in
selecting procedures and technologies.
9
See information on database management in section 3.5.
40
4.3.6 – Contributors to the national management plan
The relevant ministry will be helped in drawing up the draft plan referred to in section 4.3.5
above, for the purpose of analysing information concerning its implementation and final review
by a commission comprising:
(a) Officials nominated by the ministers responsible for the environment, industry, home
affairs, defence, transport, health, trade and handicrafts;
(b) Local community representatives (towns and regions);
(c) Representative of the national environmental agency;
(d) Representative of the national agency for food safety;
(e) Representatives of companies working towards the exploitation and elimination of PCB-
containing appliances;
(f) Representatives of approved environmental protection organizations.
The relevant ministry will decide on the composition of the commission, nominate its members,
define their role and designate its secretariat.
The draft plan will be available for consultation by the public, both in local government offices
and in the Ministry of the Environment for a designated period of X months; a public
announcement of the opening date of this consultation period must be published at least 15 days
in advance in two national newspapers.
The draft plan will be submitted to those in charge of classified installations for their
information. It will be approved by order of the Minister of the Environment after consultation
with the other ministers concerned. The plan can be consulted in the Ministry of the
Environment and in local government offices.
41
5 – General on-site technical safety measures
General on-site technical safety measures should be issued in the form of directives which will
help promote the enforcement of the regulations within the area in question. The following
elements of such directives are provided for information only.
Because of the noxious properties of PCBs and their ability to bio-accumulate, strict safety and
protection measures must be applied during the storage, handling and use of these products. It is
therefore necessary:
• To warn staff of the risks posed by these products, the necessary precautions to adopt, and the
measures to take in the event of accidents;
• To prohibit, because of the risks of decomposition and subsequent release of toxic substances,
the use of any flame-producing appliance in the presence of PCBs, or any appliances which
raise the temperature of a metallic surface to high levels (this means the banning of any
welding operations and the oxy-acetylene cutting of PCB-containing transformers);
• To avoid as far as possible the release of vapours in workshops where PCB-containing
appliances are repaired, ensure good ventilation in work stations, regularly test the air at the
level where it is inhaled by staff;
• Store products and wastes in sealed and labelled metal containers which must be kept in
adequately ventilated premises;
• Avoid any contact of the products with the skin or the eye area. For this purpose staff must
be provided with suitable protective gear:
See annex VII for first aid instructions to be followed in case of accidents.
First of all, regular checks should be made of the watertightness of the appliances, but in all
cases a watertight mechanism should also be available for the containment of spills:
• Existing installations: The existing retention system can be maintained if it is watertight and
if there is no danger of overflow seeping into the natural environment or the public sanitation
network;
• New installations: The mechanism must have a minimum capacity at least equal to the
highest of the following values:
42
• The requirement to have a watertight retention mechanism does not apply to capacitors
permeated with PCBs in the form of gel, as this is not likely to escape if the outer casing were
to break;
• Alert the relevant authorities (e.g., the classified installations inspectorate) in the event of any
spreading of PCBs and risk of contamination to the environment;
• Alert the duty doctor and make sure the staff are equipped with PCB-protective outfits:
wrap-around goggles, gloves and overshoes;
• Mark out a safety perimeter and, where necessary, ventilate the premises using all the means
available;
• Limit PCB spill by sealing the breach (using pieces of rag, plastic film) and by using
absorbents (such as sand, sawdust, cement);
• Clean the flooring:
Ø If it is watertight:
- Scrape thoroughly and use steam to soften the PCBs;
- Under no circumstances must a flame without protection be used. Chlorinated solvent
should not be used, using only mild Teepol-based detergents – such as dishwashing
liquid;
Ø If it is not watertight, heavily contaminated underfloor supports must be removed:
concrete, earth etc.;
Ø If there is any risk of ground water contamination the appropriate measures must be taken
immediately to limit, settle and ultimately eliminate the pollution.
• Place all the polluted products that have been gathered up (washing water, earth with a higher
than 100 ppm pollution level, clothing etc.) in watertight containers for their subsequent
destruction by incineration at an authorized site.
Note:
• Soil with a pollution level higher than 100 ppm must be treated;
• At a concentrate between 10 and 100 ppm it should be disposed of in an approved landfill or
kept on site;
• At under 10 ppm it is considered non-contaminated;
• Water cannot be thrown out unless its PCB content is less than 0.5 µg/litre.
43
5.4 – Measures to be taken to avert “hot” accidents
To avoid the possibility of dielectrical decomposition, which can occur when toxic vapours
reach 300°, the following steps must be taken:
• Ban the accumulation of all inflammable matter (paper, cardboard cartons, rags, paint,
solvents) from the vicinity of the equipment or block off the equipment using two hour rated
fire-walls (one-hour rated fire-doors) to protect it from the possibility of fire from the outside;
• Inform fire and emergency services of the presence of PCB-containing equipment, so that
their emergency procedures can be adapted accordingly;
• Check (or have checked by an approved organization) that the PCB-containing appliances are
not operating on electrical overload;
• Check that the electrical equipment has protection ensuring it switches itself off in the event
of any internal malfunction and issue instructions banning the manual re-starting of the
equipment before the cause of the original malfunction can be determined;
• Ensure that gas is kept properly sealed. The sites where PCBs are handled and PCB-
containing appliances are kept must be partitioned off from sites where other activities are
carried out. It is particularly advisable to take steps to ensure that any smoke and vapour
resulting from an accident should be prevented from reaching neighbouring sites or offices
(by way of technical shafts, ventilation pipes, waste disposal pipes, etc.).
5.5 – Action to be taken in the event of an accident caused by an electrical fault or a fire
• First scenario: the transformer is intact. There has only been some internal priming, and
melting of the fuses:
Ø Do not replace them without testing them first and do not open the transformer
without taking precautions;
Ø Use an oxygen mask with a gas filter as the internal pressure may have risen adding to
the risk of an escape of hydrochloric gas;
• Second scenario: arcing has occurred, leading to a crack in the tank of the appliance but no
decomposition in the presence of oxygen (no fire). This type of accident involves the spread
of PCBs in a liquid state with hydrochloric acid vapours. It is a “cold accident” situation and
the measures to be taken are those prescribed for the previous scenario;
• Third scenario: there has been re-priming of an open, run-down appliance or a fire in the
plant. Both cases present a risk of PCB decomposition due to heat and the presence of
oxygen and the formation not only of hydrochloric gas but even more significantly of toxic
compounds, furans and dioxins. There is consequently a risk of “hot pollution”. In this case,
it is necessary:
44
Ø To cordon off the polluted area, ensuring that access to it is strictly controlled and
accessible only to persons provided with a special protective kit (waterproof overalls,
goggles, mask, overshoes) and then only when absolutely necessary and for the
shortest possible time;
Ø To confine the pollution as much as possible by sealing off all channels of
communication between polluted and non-polluted areas.
The authorities may order the evacuation of the polluted area (if it is widespread) and an
inspection of the contamination. This inspection is an extremely complex and delicate
exercise and must be carried out under the strictest conditions. According to the results of
these inspections, the classified installations inspectorate – or equivalent service – might ask
the owner to take certain essential steps essential for the decontamination of the premises in
question:
Ø Put into a container all rubble, valueless objects and contaminated clothing for their
subsequent destruction by incineration at an authorized site;
Ø Steam-clean or solvent-wash immovable surfaces and valuable objects to eliminate
any removable contamination and to reduce drastically the general contamination
with a view to bringing the premises back to normal prior to their reoccupation. Even
though the techniques involved are relatively simple, the decontamination of
premises damaged by fire must be carried out by professionals.
It is possible to carry out certain standard maintenance procedures in situ, such as:
For these operations to be carried out effectively the following steps are necessary:
• Give the doctor on duty a list of the personnel involved in the work;
• Provide the aforesaid personnel with compulsory PCB-protective kit; (gloves, wraparound
goggles);
• Ensure that the work space is adequately ventilated;
• Avoid any release of PCBs. The work should be done on a watertight surface, with a sheet
being added where necessary;
• Ensure that the maintenance materials used are adapted to and compatible with PCBs;
• Avoid all contact with naked flame and all heating of PCBs or of the appliance itself
(especially where welding is involved);
• Collect all the PCB-polluted wastes produced by this work and place it in watertight metallic
containers for its subsequent elimination at an authorized site.
All key operations such as decanting, rewinding of coils, changing of voltage etc., must be
performed in specially equipped and duly authorized workshops.
45
6. Transport and storage of PCBs
Any transboundary movement of dangerous chemicals or hazardous wastes containing PCBs
must respect the obligations set out in the Basel and Rotterdam conventions. Readers are
encouraged to consult both conventions, and to review the legal and institutional aspects of the
control of transboundary movements which apply to hazardous chemicals or hazardous wastes
in general10. The following sections provide information of a general technical nature as well as
specific technical information on the collection, transport and storage of PCBs and PCB-
contaminated equipment.
This covers:
Guaranteed routing
The transporters guarantee comes into force the moment he takes the merchandise on board.
This has the effect of exonerating the consignor from liability for anything that might befall the
merchandise between loading and delivery.
The loader is responsible for providing the transporter with all the information needed to ensure
fulfilment of the guarantee of safe delivery of the merchandise.
These concern the loader, not the transporter. The transporter must ensure that that these
operations are carried out in accordance with the regulations governing the types of transport
being used. There are five different kinds of regulation, depending on the type of transport:
It is therefore necessary to use the crating and packaging methods prescribed for the type of
transport chosen for any transboundary movement of hazardous materials. These regulations are
not specific to industrial hazardous wastes but apply to chemicals in general. In the case of
wastes that contain several substances physically mixed up together, the mixture is classified
according to the most hazardous of these substances. For example, a mixture of mineral oil with
a PCB content above 50 ppm is classified as a PCB.
10
Reference should be made, in particular, to the Instruction Manual - Control System for Transboundary
Movements of Hazardous Wastes and other Wastes - SBC No. 98/003, March 1998.
46
Collection and transport of dangerous materials
1- It is crucial that the consignor of a dangerous product be aware of its chemical properties in
order:
• The types of packaging and transport depend on the hazard class and the packing class to
which the product belongs and the markings on the package:
Hazard classes
1 1a: explosives
1b: ammunition
1c: fireworks ? flares ?
2 Compressed gases, liquefied or dissolved
3 Flammable liquids
4 4.1: Flammable solids
4.2: Substances liable to spontaneous combustion
4.3: Substances which, in contact with water, release flammable gases
5 5.1: Oxidizing agents
5.2: Organic peroxides
6 6.1: Poisonous substances
6.2: Infectious substances
7 Radioactive substances
8 Corrosive substances
9 Miscellaneous dangerous substances
Packing groups
47
All types of merchandise have been divided into three categories or packing groups according to
the risk level, except for explosives, gases, organic peroxides and radioactive materials.
The correct packing group for any product or object will be indicated on its card or in the
general code index.
Labelling
The purpose of labelling is to identify the nature of the risks presented by the merchandise and
to alert all those involved in its transporting or handling to the appropriate precautions to take.
Identification and classification of the product are fundamental to all packaging, transportation
and storage operations. All chemical products are itemized with a UN code and placed in one of
the hazard classes and packing groups.
For example:
• Liquid waste with an NSA alcohol content (not otherwise specified) has as its UN code
the number 1987, is in hazard class 3 and packing group M;
• A solvent used for drying in the electronics industry – trifluorotrichloroethane – has the
UN code 1082, hazard class 2.1 and packing group M.
• Electrical equipment;
• Fire extinguishers using:
• Water;
• Foam;
• Halocarbons;
• Carbon dioxide (CO2);
• Chemical powders;
• Miscellaneous equipment:
• Speed restricters;
• Hydraulic hoses;
• Tachometers;
• On-board accessories (battery selector switches)
• Special protective equipment and marking materials (wrapping materials, plastic
bags, plastic sheeting, absorbents, spades, masks, marking tape, empty drums –
both open-top and covered, disposable overalls, special gloves and shoes for this
purpose),
48
• Safety card clearly displayed in the cabin and warning plates outside the truck
(“danger” signs and orange disks)
Special instructions:
• No transporting of inflammable products;
• The driver of the specially equipped vehicle must be made aware of the type of product being
transported and the risks attached (a safety card should be included with the transport
documents);
• Emergency instructions for incidents and accidents must be known so that fire, hot pollution,
cold pollution, spillage and the release of PCBs into the environment can be avoided;
• Safety instructions for PCBs must be known.
Identification of drums
Drums for the transport of dangerous materials must be duly approved and identified with
indelible markings to this effect marked on the outside and on the cover. These markings take
the form of a code with the following elements:
Sample sign for closed drums 2001 (liquids):
Filling level: 90%
Types of packaging
49
Taking into consideration the age and condition of the equipment to be destroyed, it is
recommended that the transformers be drained before transporting. They can thus be carried
emptied and drained. In any case it should be remembered that transformer tanks cannot be
classified as packages approved for transport.
For obvious safety reasons it is not a good idea to put drained transformers and PCB liquid
drums into the same bins, as the drums might be damaged by the transformer shells.
Information form
Category 3
Petroleum products not otherwise specified
IMDG code: 3375
Marine pollutants
Flash point > 61° C
Packing group III.
When there is a mixture of products the choice of transport category is based on the product with
the highest risks. In this case categories 3 or 9 dominate in relation to category 9.
Transport documentation
2 – Packing list: The packing list should show the number, weight and type of all appliances
and packages per container, together with a summary of the weight.
3 – Declaration of dangerous merchandise (see following page)
50
51
4 – Container packing diagram
This diagram shows the location of each product and how it is blocked and chocked within the
container.
PCB labels (UN 2315-marine pollutant) must be attached to the four sides of the maritime
containers as well as to the metal cases and the transformers inside the containers.
The containers must be padlocked and sealed. The seal number must be shown on the hazardous
materials declaration.
Given the history of waste production and its time-limited production, it seems more appropriate
that this type of waste should have a temporary storage area specifically for PCBs. The flow of
PCB wastes should however have dried up at some time in the period 2015-2020, depending on
the specific country and the national regulations. Moreover, PCBs cannot be stored together with
inflammable wastes which means that the creation of multi-purpose storage areas is virtually
impossible.
Storage methods
First the transformers are drained into 2001-type metal drums with UN-coded seals and the
drums themselves are placed in metal bins for the onward journey. This operation can be carried
out on the owner’s premises to ensure transport safety as far as the storage area.
52
Group N°: 90 201 // UN code 2315 // IMO class: 9
Packing group: II // Labelling: 9 // IMDG code 9036
The storage area can be made up of so-called “final voyage” 40 ft containers. These cost around
$2,000 per piece and have a capacity of 20 tons each.
The above photo shows a temporary storage area located in West Africa
The principle underlying temporary storage is the refusal to accept any products unless their
final destination has already been determined, both contractually and administratively.
“Contractually” refers to the contract of destruction drawn up between the owner and the
elimination centre. “Administratively” means that an elimination procedure has been authorized
for this type of waste or an export licence issued, in the event of any transboundary movement
of the said wastes. Although the storage is temporary, it still has to be properly authorized.
53
7 – Draft regulations on polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated
terphenyls (PCBs and PCTs)
7.1 – Draft regulations
Draft regulations on the use and destruction of PCBs are given here by way of example. These
have been based on current regulations in several developed countries and are tailored to the
specific PCB-management conditions, at the various stages of the PCB life-cycle, in a “pilot”
developing country. The draft is supplemented by a list of comments pertaining to each article
and explaining its purpose (see section 7.2).
Proposal
Article 1: Definitions
For the purposes of the present directive, the following definitions apply:
(a) “PCBs”: “Wastes, substances and articles containing, consisting of or contaminated with
polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), polychlorinated terphenyl (PCT), polychlorinated naphthalene
(PCN) or polybrominated biphenyl (PBB), or any other polybrominated analogues of these
compounds, at a concentration level of 50 mg/kg or more.” (Category A 3180 of classification A
of the Basel Convention)
Polychlorinated biphenyls,
Polychlorinated terphenyls,
All mixtures in which the total volume of the aforementioned substances exceeds 0.005% (50
ppm) in weight:
54
(d) “owner”: the person who has physical possession of or moral responsibility for PCBs, used PCBs
and/or appliances containing PCBs;
(e) “decontamination”: the entire set of operations which enable appliances, objects, materials or
liquids contaminated by PCBs to be reused, recycled or disposed of in secure facilities which can also
include substitution, referring to the entire process in which PCBs are replaced by similar liquids that do
not contain PCBs;
(f) “disposal”: This refers to the processing of PCB-containing wastes, all stages of the
destruction of PCB molecules, the decontamination of PCB-containing appliances, the replacing
of PCB fluid in the appliances referred to in article 4 .1, the decontamination of other PCB-
containing materials and objects and the recovery of PCB fluids;.
Article 2: Implementation
The purpose of the present decree is to regulate the conditions surrounding the declaration,
operation, use, handling, transport, storage and disposal of PCBs as defined in article 1 of the
present decree.
On publication of the present decree in the official newspaper of…. [country], all import,
manufacture, installation, purchase, sale or transfer, whether free or against a charge, of PCBs,
PCB-containing electrical equipment or materials contaminated by PCBs shall be prohibited.
The seller of a building containing a PCB appliance is subject to declaration in terms of the
relevant legislation on classified installations must inform the buyer accordingly.
Any person infringing the above regulations will be subject to penalties set out in act n° […] of
[date], providing the Environmental Code.
PCB owners, as defined in article 1, must declare such ownership to the technical section of the
Ministry of the Environment, using the form provided in annex I to the present decree.
This declaration must be made within a period of six (6) months from the publication of the
present decree in the official newspaper of … [country].
All owners of appliances must inform the appropriate authorities of the quantities they contain
and of any change in these quantities.
All appliances declared must be labelled. The labelling, a description of which is provided in
annex III to the present decree, must clearly state the presence of PCBs and the risks that could
be caused by fire. The same type of labelling should also be used on the doors of the premises
where the appliance is kept.
55
Companies providing facilities for the storage, containment or disposal of PCBs must keep a
register detailing the quantity, origin, nature and PCB content of the used PCBs delivered to
them. This information is then transmitted to the appropriate authorities.
Appliances that were retrofilled before the present decree came into force must be declared as
PCBs if PCB screening was not carried out on the dielectrics.
Appliances whose dielectrics have not been marked on their identification disks and which have
not undergone PCB screening must be declared as PCBs.
All equipment in current use containing PCBs as defined in article 1 of the present decree is
obliged to be retrofitted according to the methods defined in annex II.
Repairs to PCB transformers in use, as defined in article 1 of the present decree, are authorized
subject to the technical conditions defined in annex IV. Retrofilling of PCB transformers in use
is forbidden.
This inspection must be carried out by an authorized company and the results forwarded to the
classified installations inspectorate.
The first inspection must be carried out no later than 12 months after the entry into force of the
present decree.
The authorized company will use the results of the first inspection to decide on the subsequent
timetable of inspections.
The technical visit reports must be forwarded to the Ministry of the Environment.
The PCBs referred to in article 1 of the present decree must be disposed of before 2013.
All persons owning, in any capacity whatsoever, wastes containing PCBs, must have these
treated at sites authorized by the Ministry of the Environment.
56
Article 9: Final disposal of PCBs and decontamination of scrapped appliances
It is forbidden to mix PCB-containing wastes with other wastes or with any other substance prior
to their being handed over to the authorized company.
Diluting measures aimed at reducing PCB concentration to a pollution level lower than 50 ppm
are forbidden. Material impregnated with PCBs cannot be scrapped before being
decontaminated to a permanent level of less than 50 ppm of the mass of the object in question.
Any company involved in storing, containing, decontaminating and disposing of used PCBs
and/or PCB-containing appliances must be duly accredited.
The handling and transporting of PCBs must be carried out according to the conditions laid
down in the order of the Ministry of the Environment and defined in annex V.
Packaging used for PCBs can not be reused for any other products and must be disposed of in
the same fashion as PCBs.
The transfer is forbidden of any solid or liquid PCBs, as defined in article 1 of the present
decree, except for the purpose of technical retrofitting or repair operations as defined in annexes
II and IV.
In the event of an accident (breakage, explosion, fire, etc.), the owner must immediately inform
the appropriate services, which will explain the protective measures to be taken, including the
initial steps to minimize the consequences of the accident.
The inspector may require the conduct of the necessary analyses to determine the extent of PCB
contamination of the installation and the environment, or, where appropriate, contamination by
decomposed products.
In the light of the results of these analyses the technical services of the Ministry of the
Environment may require the owner to carry out whatever work is necessary for the
decontamination of the areas concerned.
Further specification of these analyses and operations will be provided (by ministerial order)
where justified by the scale of the accident.
The operator must keep the inspectorate informed as to the progress of the work and other
measures required.
Rubble, earth and other contaminated materials must be disposed of in approved premises.
The conditions under which action is to be taken in the event of PCB pollution are defined in
annex VI.
57
Article 13: Transboundary movements of PCBs
Equipment that could potentially contain PCBs may only be imported subject to the results of an
analysis to be carried out by an independent, duly accredited laboratory at the expense of the
exporter. This analysis must show a PCB content of less than 3 ppm.
Transit operations may only be authorized if there is no other viable solution that does not involve
a risk of pollution.
PCB exports are only authorized in operations involving the final treatment of PCBs and the
decontamination of PCB-containing equipment.
Exports must be carried out in compliance with the provisions of the Basel Convention on the
Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and ratified by … [country].
The Ministry of the Environment shall establish the benchmark methods to be used in
determining the PCB content of contaminated materials. Measures implemented prior to the
determination of such reference methods remain valid.
Article 15:
Article 1: It is important to work out an exact definition of PCBs for those products that are not
100% PCB but have a greater than 50 ppm contamination level. This applies, for example, to
mineral oil transformers with a dielectric content greater than 50 ppm.
The article suggests retaliatory methods to be used against those contravening the terms of the
said article.
Article 4: This article obliges all PCB owners to declare themselves to the appropriate
authorities to ensure the traceability of all PCB installations in the country in question and to
implement a projected elimination plan ending in 2013.
Article 5: The purpose of retrofitting existing installations is to prevent pollution that can be
caused by active transformers.
58
Catch basin To prevent the release of liquid PCBs
Disconnection mechanism for use if To prevent the risk of any thermal decomposition of
there is any malfunctioning of the the dielectrics and production of toxic gases (PCDD
appliance and PCDF).
Sealing of ventilation shafts To avert the dispersal of toxic gas into the air-
conditioning system
In any event, retrofilling has no significant effect on the initial PCB content of the transformer.
Article 7: Technical inspection is a legal precondition for the use of PCB transformers, in
environmentally sound management conditions, up to the end of their service life.
Article 8: 2013 has been set as the final date for disposal of all PCBs within the country in
question. This date has taken into account the 1984 ban on the production and distribution of
PCBs in producing countries.
Bearing in mind that 1984 would be the last year of PCB imports and that the average working
life of a transformer is 30 years, then the year 2013 would in fact be the end of the time span
allowed for the replacement of these appliances.
Article 9: This article, on PCB disposal, is designed to prevent non-controlled procedures for
the elimination of hazardous wastes. The specific procedures concerned are scrapping, burning,
dumping and dilution, the last of which is already covered in some detail in, for example, the
environmental code of Côte d’Ivoire (used as the model here).
Article 10: Although already mentioned in the Ivorian regulations on the transport of hazardous
materials, the transport conditions for PCBs must be spelled out in more detail because of the
risks arising from their toxicity.
Article 11: It is essential that transfers and deliberate spills designed to evade regulatory
constraints should be banned, to prevent the growth of PCBs in ecosystems, not least because of
the way they bio-accumulate and are not bio-degradable in the natural environment.
Article 12: The purpose of this article is to define the technical operations to be implemented in
order:
Article 13: These regulatory constraints on the export of PCBs are specifically designed to
prevent the illegal transfer for commercial purposes of PCB-containing electrical equipment into
the countries of the subregion.
59
8 – Financial tools for the management and destruction of PCBs
Responsibility for meeting the costs of destroying PCBs should be shared by various
stakeholders, including those owning and manufacturing the PCBs. In this context, in
developing countries, the electricity production and distribution networks account for a large
part, up to 40%, of the national stock of PCBs, because of the level of industrial activity and the
consumption of low-voltage electricity. There is no hard and fast rule about how these costs
should be shared among the various economic sectors mentioned above. These networks may be
completely public, completely private or a combination of the two. Moreover, by reason of their
activities, it is the electricity production and distribution companies which hold most of the
obsolete PCB stocks.
Any analysis of this problem must also take into account the different attitudes to industrial
waste management as seen by the public and the private sectors. Looked at in this way,
economic activity can be divided into three different sectors, each showing differing attitudes to
the problem of the environmentally sustainable management of PCB-containing equipment:
Managers in the public sector are also receptive to the need to develop clean technology and its
associated systems. The PCB problem is a good example, as it was very quickly taken on board
in the environmental management of their activities. The public sector’s enhanced sensitivity to
environmental issues is facilitated by the dissemination of a wide range of information.
The problem, however, will remain unresolved as long as the funding made available to the
sector for the management of PCBs remains confidential (for the retrofilling of existing fillings,
the replacement of obsolete appliances, the destruction of scrapped appliances). Stocktaking
exercises carried out in Africa show that there are stocks of scrapped PCB transformers that
have been stored for several years with no special precautions, and these have caused significant
levels of soil pollution.
The position taken by the public sector on the funding of PCB management operations is clear:
management programmes must be implemented with the support of important bilateral or
multilateral financial mechanisms. This does not apply to capacity enhancing alone but also to
the whole management of PCBs right up to their final elimination.
(a) The national private sector, inasmuch as it is obliged to produce profits in a competitive
context, takes a different approach to the question of hazardous industrial waste. This particular
situation encourages lobbying and even economic “blackmail” as a way of evading
60
environmental obligations. The problem they have is not with the concept of control itself but
with the financial impact it has on production costs and competitiveness.
The national private sector is therefore not inclined to support the additional financial costs
incurred by PCB management, and PCB transformers are only replaced for reasons of technical
efficiency (obsolescence, increased capacity, modernization).
(b) The multinational private sector applies environmental management standards generally
supervised by an environmental official and expressed in strict directives laid down by the
parent company. This company policy has to be seen within the general context of multinational
activity, in which the multinationals are at times called to task for their social and environmental
management. The extensive media coverage given to PCBs in industrialized countries has made
the relevant officials within the multi-nationals more aware of the significant environmental
impact of their industrial activity on developing countries and of its repercussions. In
consequence, many multi-nationals are implementing plans for the elimination of PCB
transformers and taking responsibility for the cost of these programmes in both financial and
human terms.
The informal sector, although not as directly concerned with the problem of PCB management,
must also be taken into consideration when analysing the way PCBs are handled. In the
majority of cases businesses within the informal sector buy low-voltage power and rarely use
high-voltage electrical fittings. It is unusual for this sector to buy medium-voltage power and
transform it down to low-voltage using its own transformers. In such cases step-down
transformers are administered by the public or private companies which produce and distribute
electricity.
Moreover the informal sector is especially concerned with the recycling of electrical
transformers, including the recycling of metals and oil from transformers. An electrical
transformer can contain up to 20% of its total weight in copper, and this represents significant
market value for a business in the informal sector. The copper is generally reprocessed by open
air burning with used tyres so as to produce a resin-less copper. This copper is then sold for
recycling, to be used in the production of new equipment.
Another method is to recycle the copper as copper wire, using a simple unwinding process. This
process can also be applied to magnetic sheets. While these methods are environmentally sound
for mineral oil transformers, this does not apply to PCB-containing equipment, where there are
extremely negative impacts on health and environment. Thus, during the burning process, the
thermal decomposition of the PCBs at a low temperature produces carbon monoxide, chlorine,
dioxins and furans. The oil from transformers can also be recycled as a fuel substitute, hydraulic
fluid, moulding oil or for phytosanitary use. PCB oils are thus 100% recycled or else mixed with
used oil to be re-sold as fuel or as chemical products for various uses.
In the informal sector, the management of PCB transformers while they are in industrial use
causes the problem as the recycling of used electrical transformers. Future financial mechanisms
will therefore have to take into consideration the specific nature of these recycling procedures.
In this case, to be effective, financial compensation would have to match the returns from the
existing recycling process.
61
8.2 – PCBs and hazardous industrial waste in the private industrial sector
Several factors must be taken into consideration when the concept of hazardous industrial waste
is applied to PCBs. These factors underline the difficulties of regulating the use of PCBs in the
private industrial sector:
• When these types of equipment were first put on the market, before they were banned, there
were no restrictions placed on industries regarding their use or requirements for them to be
scrapped. Private sector users are therefore reluctant to accept responsibility for the
consequences of regulations laid down subsequent to their acquisition of this equipment. The
sector is naturally anxious to avoid having to bear the financial costs of the sound
environmental management of this equipment while it is in industrial use until its final
elimination.
• The positions taken by the international community, based on the precautionary principle, in,
on the one hand, the environmental management of chemical products such as CFCs
(Montreal Protocol) and, on the other, the legal campaigns to make asbestos manufacturers
retroactively responsible for environmental consequences, lend further weight to the position
taken by the private sector in developing countries in ascribing historical responsibility to the
industrialized countries. As such, it is difficult to justify the setting up of compensatory
financial mechanisms in the industrialized countries if the same is not applied to developing
countries.
• Electrical fittings containing PCBs are considered primarily as industrial products and not as
hazardous industrial wastes. The concept of industrial waste is part of the development of
chemical industries.
• Even if the PCBs contained in electrical appliances are identified as being a hazardous
chemical substances, this does not necessarily hold true for the appliance itself. The
phenomenon of PCB impregnation into the porous parts of transformers (about 5% of the
initial quantity of PCBs) is generally ignored, thus opening up the possibility of trade in
second-hand transformers.
• The processing of industrial waste in developing countries is rarely “internalized” and
integrated into production costs. If PCBs were to be included on the list of hazardous
industrial wastes then financial mechanisms would need to be implemented based on the
‘polluter pays’ principle and, for example, the contribution of funding bodies to the
redistribution of the compensatory pollution taxes which would need to be collected.
If the cost of destroying the appliance is imposed unilaterally on its possessor, some of these
appliances will not be dealt with in an “environmentally sound” manner. There would be a great
risk of a situation where significant numbers of PCBs would be released unofficially into the
environment. Industrialized countries have noted during the preparation of inventories that, at
the time when PCBs were introduced into environmental law, a significant quantity of
appliances with PCBs “disappeared”. These appliances are sometimes exported and re-sold as
second-hand transformers in non-industrialized countries. The export of fittings containing
PCBs under the label “second-hand transformer” will follow the path of least resistance in
countries where the law is incomplete or not implemented, border controls are non-existent,
standards of public health are low and also where regulations to enforce responsibility are barely
developed. These factors, associated with the high costs of elimination, are the driving force
behind such cases of illegal trafficking as defined by the Basel Convention.
The meaningful discussions that have already taken place in certain countries that are party to
the Basel Convention have brought to light the necessity for countries to develop targeted
approaches, taking into account the aforementioned factors. With this in mind, the reluctance of
manufacturers and of non-industrialized countries to finance the destruction of products
62
imported several decades ago on the basis of their excellent physico-chemical qualities compels
us to look for financial solutions that will involve a combination of the public sector, the private
sector and external sources.
Accordingly, the national PCB management policy should be a process that involves the owner
from the very first stage of the inventory process and allows for the product concerned to be
followed and its movements to be tracked by the authorized bodies up to the end of its natural
life and its destruction.
5 – Multilateral financing
The principle of multilateral financing has been introduced into the financial mechanisms of the
Stockholm Convention. The amount of time needed for their implementation could be
detrimental to the sound management of PCBs, leading to the existence of obsolete and, in many
cases, orphan stocks, necessitating short-term action.
6 –Tied loans
These mechanisms are widely used in industrialized countries and link the ‘polluter pays’
principle with environmental responsibility on the part of the industries that generate industrial
11
For this refer to the compilation of national reports prepared by the secretariat of the Basel Convention.
63
waste. Under an agreement between the producer or owner of industrial waste and a national
environmental agency, the industry can benefit from financial mechanisms for the processing of
its industrial waste in return for an undertaking to ensure the proper environmental management
of its industrial activity. These mechanisms can be implemented as loans or in the form of
participation in financing the costs of processing hazardous industrial waste. They have the
advantage of creating awareness within the industry generating the industrial waste by the
implementation of environmentally sound waste management
When applied to PCBs, this type of financial mechanism can also have an educational effect
insofar as it allows the concept of environmentally sound management to be introduced into
industrial activity and extends this sense of responsibility beyond PCBs alone.
The ‘polluter pays’ principle has already been introduced into the environmental law of many
countries, but even so PCB owners are loath to accept the principle, for the following reasons:
The evaluation of these costs covers all operations involving PCB transformers from declaration
of ownership to final elimination.
Technical control:
Retrofitting:
64
Evaluation of the costs of management, treatment and elimination
The replacement of the appliance is not taken into consideration since this depends purely on its
age and has nothing to do with whether or not it contains any PCBs.
When applying for partial or total financing of the costs of management and elimination, the
eligibility of owners would be subject to the mandatory requirements set out in the regulations:
12
Initial forecast based on current known situation and prevailing conditions; elimination by incineration at
specialized overseas sites (Europe, North America etc.).
13
Initial forecast based on decontamination of equipment shells carried out locally with assistance of technology
transfer.
14
This solution is not elaborated in detail here, but the manufacturers of electrical equipment could submit tenders
for the recovery or processing of existing equipment when it is due to be replaced;
65
Financial scenario in US dollars (by way of example)
(consumption of electricity: 2,400,000,000 kW-1,000 T)
• The loan agreement is to be signed by the owner and the funding body;
• This agreement cannot enter into force until the owner has complied with the technical
obligations of making a declaration and retrofitting following the initial technical
inspection;
• The expenses involved are to be submitted to the funding body in the form of a quotation
which will be included in the financing agreement;
• The body designated to manage these agreements will receive for each signed agreement
the corresponding pollution compensation fees and financial support from GEF;
• The owner will pay the agency its share of the self-financing over a period of five years,
per appliance and per year (scaled according to weight);
• The expenses to be incurred under this agreement are to be paid by the funding body to
the various suppliers involved in this agreement, which should enable the funding body
to issue calls for tender in major markets.
As part of the approval process, the funding arrangements should be subjected to a specific
study which would take account of different scenarios such as:
• The distribution of pollution compensation fees levied for the overall consumption or
the industrial consumption of electricity;
• Self-financing contribution by the owners;
• Financial support contributed by GEF.
15
Administrative, projuct management and funding costs etc. are not included in this calculation. The calculation
is made in real money values.
66
Annexes
II: Retrofitting
III: Labelling
IV: Repairs
XIII: References
67
Annex I – PCB declaration form
Transformer
Capacitor
Drums
Manufacturers
Power (kVA)
Date of manufacture
Age of transformer
Dielectrics identified as 100% PCB
Dielectrics identified as mineral oil > 50 ppm
Dielectrics identified as mineral oil < 50 ppm
Retrofilled transformer
Dry transformer
Not determined
Serial number
Total weight in kg
Dielectrical weight
Commercial name of the
dielectric
In use
Stand-by
In storage prior to destruction
68
SAFETY YES NO
Lack of PCB warning signs on the equipment
PCB warning signs in the workshop area
PCB warning signs outside the premises
PCB warning signs (equipment, in premises, outside premises)
Volume contained > PCB volume
Volume contained < PCB volume
Lack of retention devices
SERVICING
Inspections at intervals of less than one year
Inspections at intervals of between one and three years
Inspections at intervals of more than three years
Not determined
Checking of dielectric fluid
Checking of insulation
Analysis of dielectrics
Fault detector for gas, temperature, pressure
Short circuit protection
Gaseous phase chromatography
Gaseous phase chromatography (result)
Breakdown voltage
Acidity test
Presence of PCBs and mineral oil on the same site
Connections to air-conditioning systems
Adequate ventilation in the workshop
Access restricted to authorized personnel
Apparent leakage of dielectrics
Contaminated soil
Taking oil samples
Oil contamination level
No samples taken
Comments:
69
Annex II – Retrofitting
Every precautionary measure should be taken to avoid even the slightest risk of fire. To this end,
the PCBs should be stored far away from any inflammable substance. All deposits of pollutants
and appliances impregnated with PCBs should be fitted with watertight devices to prevent
discharges, with a capacity greater than, or at least equal to the highest of the following values:
• Existing installations: the existing retention system can be retained if it is watertight and if its
overflow is not likely to seep into the natural environment or the public sanitation network;
• New installations: the device must have a capacity which is at least equal to the highest of the
following values:
• 50% of the total stored volume (a site containing a transformer holding 400 litres
of pyraline and two other transformers with a capacity of 300 litres must have a
retention capacity of at least 500 litres).
Stocks should be kept in hard-wearing receptacles and should be clearly marked. All PCB-
containing appliances should be labelled. For existing installations which have mineral oil
appliances and PCB-containing appliances at the same site, a two-hour rating firewall must be
erected (high ceilings, vertical partitions, etc.); potential communication channels with other
sites must be fire-proofed to at least one-hour rating. As the opening faces the exit the doors
must be strengthened.
Preventative measures must be taken to minimize the probability and the consequences of
accidents that might cause a release of toxic substances (one of the main causes of these accidents
is a fault in the electrical protection of individual pieces of equipment upstream or downstream of
the appliance. Thus excessive internal pressure on the equipment, possibly produced by an
electrical fault, can cause a breach that then leads to a release of PCBs: it is essential to prevent
arcing which might start a fire).
Electrical equipment containing PCBs must conform to the standards in force at the time of
installation. Arrangements for the protection of individual appliances must also ensure that the
appliances cannot be automatically switched back on. Instructions must also be given to prevent
the equipment being manually re-started before the fault has been identified.
A trouble-shooting mechanism for the detection of gas, temperature and pressure faults must be
installed in every appliance in use. The user must take all the constructive precautions available
on site to avoid the circulation into offices or inhabited areas of any accidental release of vapours
from the dielectric. Above all these vapours must not be allowed to reach any waste-removal or
ventilation pipes or shafts not exclusively used by the workshop. When the shafts used by the
workshop provide access to other areas, such as those mentioned above, then they must be
equipped, at the connection points, with a watertight, pressure-resistant plug.
70
When the workshop is accessible from a private, enclosed space that itself leads to the above-
mentioned pipes or areas, then it is especially important that the connecting door be watertight
and pressure-resistant. Thus, transformers containing PCBs are considered to be properly
protected when one of the following measures is implemented:
• Basic protection, provided by power-calibrated fuses;
• Instant voltage shut-off in the event of excess pressure, the detection of gaseous bubbles or a
drop in the dielectric level.
The user is permitted a designated period of X months in which to complete the necessary
inspections of the equipment and X years from the designated date to finish retrofitting the
equipment according to the standards set out above.
71
Annex III - Labelling
All appliances containing or having once contained PCBs must be marked with labels carrying
the following information:
This appliance contains PCBs which can contaminate the environment and which by law have to
be eliminated.
Decree No. […]
Labelling of decontaminated appliances that have contained PCBs
Each unit of the decontaminated appliance must be clearly and indelibly marked by embossing
or stamping with the following information
PCB concentration:
In the former liquid content........... % by weight
In the current liquid content.......... % by weight
72
Annex IV – Repairs
Any electrical equipment which has been through this process before the publication of the
present decree will henceforward be deemed to be PCB-containing and as such, be subject to the
same technical obligations.
With the electrical equipment designated in paragraph 1 above, however, certain oil-level
readjustments can be permitted. These adjustments can only be made, however, with oil that is
technically compatible.
PCB-containing wastes produced in the course of operating the equipment (servicing, filling,
cleaning, etc.) will be first stored and then eliminated in environmentally friendly conditions in
installations that, in all cases, are duly authorized for this purpose. The user may be required to
provide due substantiation of this at any time.
When maintenance or repair work is being carried out on site, involving the handling of PCB-
containing appliances, or the topping-up or treatment of PCB dielectrics, the user must take the
necessary precautions to prevent any risk of pollution resulting from these operations.
73
Annex V – Instructions on the handling and transport of equipment and materials
PCB wastes as defined by this decree and designated for elimination are subject to certain
standards with regard to packaging and transportation. Liquid wastes must be placed in closed
drums and solid wastes in open-top drums.
Transport
The transporter must be given an itinerary form which should indicate the nature and quantity of
the products being transported. The vehicle must be provided with the regulation signs
(hazardous materials plates)
74
Required protection equipment for the handling and transport of PCBs:
• Disposable overalls
• PVC glasses and gloves
• Overshoes
Preventative materials:
MANUFACTURER
Company
Address
Person in charge
Position
Tel/fax/e-mail
Designation of waste
Quantity
Packaging
Number of appliances
Number of containers
Signature of manufacturer
TRANSPORTER
Company
Address
Person in charge
Position
Tel/fax/e-mail
Date of shipping
Delivery date
Signature of transporter
CONSIGNEE
Company
Address
Person in charge
Position
Tel/fax/e-mail
Delivery date
Signature of consignee
destinataire :
75
Five copies of the form are drawn up:
PCB-containing equipment destined for scrap must be carefully drained prior to being stored or
transported.
76
Annex VI – Instructions on the storage of PCBs prior to their elimination
• The site must be adequately ventilated and sheltered from bad weather and the risk of
fire
• Absolutely no inflammable products should be present either on the site itself or in the
vicinity
• The floor must be watertight or equipped with a catch basin with a capacity greater than
the volume of PCB liquid on the site
• The site must be locked and subject to regular, duly logged inspections
• Signs reading “Danger PCB” must be put up inside and outside the site
• A complete inventory must be made and regularly updated of all incoming and outgoing
items
• The person responsible for stocktaking must have the necessary qualifications
• Liquid waste must be kept in regulation containers
• Prior authorization for the storage site must be obtained from the classified installations
and civil protection inspectorate, or equivalent service. This authorization will specify,
among other things:
77
Annex VII – Instructions on hot and cold pollution
• In the event of a release of PCBs and a risk of environmental contamination, alert the
classified installation and civil protection inspectorate (or equivalent service)
• Alert the doctor on duty and provide the staff with PCB protective clothing: wrap-around
glasses, gloves and/or overshoes, breathing mask fitted with a filter cartridge
• Mark out a safety perimeter and, where necessary, ventilate the site in every way possible
• Contain the PCB dispersion by sealing off the leak (with cloths, cling-film, etc.) and with the
use of inert absorbents
• Clean the soil
Watertight flooring
Non-watertight flooring
78
• Check the extent of contamination;
• On appraisal of the results of these analyses the classified installations inspectorate may
order the manufacturer to carry out various procedures essential to the decontamination of
the affected areas, namely:
• To dump rubble, objects of little value and contaminated clothing in a container for
subsequent incineration at an approved site;
• With the use of steam or solvent, to clean fixed surfaces and objects of value so as to
eliminate surface contamination and appreciably reduce the general level of
contamination with a view to re-opening the site and eventually bringing it back into use.
79
Annex VIII – Toxicity levels of PCDDs and PCDFs
Although there is a large body of scientific literature on the subject of the experimental toxicity
of PCDDs and PCDFs, it is still difficult to say exactly how long the effects of such
contamination remain in the human body. Essentially it is the knowledge acquired after the
Seveso accident of 1976 or the contamination of Times Beach (Missouri) in 1971 that makes it
possible, with hindsight, to understand the consequences of acute or prolonged contamination by
2.3.7.8 TCDD, but it would be arbitrary to extrapolate from this, with no adjustment, the
consequences of risks from thermal deterioration of PCBs. Indeed, when it was possible to
measure it, 2.3.7.8 TCDD was present in minuscule quantities.
It is true that some authors, seeking to establish the exposure threshold values as guides to
decontamination, have put forward the idea of a 2.3.7.8 TCDD equivalent for the different
isomers of PCDD and PCDF, but this is still only a theory, based on the comparative level of DL
50 with laboratory animals. Thus, 2.3.7.8 TCDF would be three times less toxic than 2,3,7,8
TCDD. Much higher toxicity levels can be seen among quite close isomers: (ratios above
10,000 between DL 50 of 1.2.3.8 TCDD and 2.3.7.8 TCDD.) As a general rule the most toxic
derivatives are isomers containing 4-6 atoms of chlorine with lateral positions 2.3.7.8
substituted. Despite its usefulness for the purposes of taking decisions, the notion of 2.3.7.8
TCDD equivalence remains questionable as the ratio between DL 50 of two derivatives such as
2.3.7.8 TCDD and 2.3.7.8 TCDF differs depending on the species in question.
Humans, like other species, absorb contamination mainly through the skin and the digestive
system. The bio-accumulation of different PCDDs and PCDFs in the fatty tissues of an organism
is evidence of the cumulative quality of toxic effects. Using epidemiological data taken from
different instances of human contamination, compared with experimental data on animals, we
can identify several possible areas of biological impact.
1. Skin disorders
Here we are dealing essentially with chloracnes, which reproduce easily in animals.
Chlorachnes have been found in humans after brief but intense periods of contamination; the
best example of this is in Seveso where several observations have been made:
• The effect of chlorachnes on children is greater than on adults, at the same level of
contamination;
• There can be a delay of up to 10 months before the effects appear;
• The intensity of the chloracne and the speed with which it takes hold are directly related to the
levels of contamination.
2. Liver disorders
Experiments on animals and massive levels of industrial contamination in the case of humans
lead us to expect the dioxins will have a toxic effect on the liver. In Seveso enlargement of the
liver (hepatomegalia) was observed in 7-8% of adults in the most exposed area. The exact nature
of the liver disorders has not been clearly defined and there has been no systematic research into
enzyme induction. A case-study of 427 persons in the exposed area and 563 persons in a
neighbouring town did not show any significant difference in the number of hepatic changes in
those who had been exposed.
80
3. Neuro-muscular effects
Few experimental studies demonstrate the likelihood of any neurological or muscular effects.
Some forms of myalgia, ataxia and swelling of the joints have, however been noted in
occupational exposures. The interpretation of clinical data and electro-physiological tests carried
out in Seveso has given rise to some controversy: it appears that the slowing down of the motor
nervous system observed in some subjects who had been exposed was no more than an
acceptable variation within the normal range.
6. Metabolic disorders
• Changes in the lipid metabolism with a heightened level of whole lipids and triglycerides were
reported in the first studies published of human occupational exposure. They were not
encountered at Seveso or Times Beach.
• Experiments show PCDDs to be powerful enzyme conductors, especially in terms of their aryl
hydrocarbon hydroxalyse (AHH) inducing potential. The liver enlargement effects noted after
the Seveso accident could perhaps be linked to this mechanism but, in the absence of
biochemical induction tests that are reliable and easy to implement, this must remain in the
realm of conjecture. The level of urinary D-glucanic acid as an indication of enzyme induction is
still being appraised.
• Disturbances of porphyrin metabolism by PCDDs are well known in animals, with a rise in the
urinary heptacarboxyporphyrin. Cases of cutaneous porphyria in humans have been noted after
significant occupational exposure. Among those of the Seveso group who had a chlorachne,
however, no anomalies were noted in the urinary excretion of porphyrins. There is a particular
interest in the identification of heptacarboxyl porphyrin among the urinary uroporphyrins.
81
show any abnormal increase in the six months following the Seveso exposure. Perinatal
mortality also appears not to have increased as a result of the toxic accident. Another
epidemiological study on the rate of miscarriages after a leakage of herbicide 2.4.5.1 –
containing 2.3.7.8 TCDD impurities – into a forested region of Canada does show, on the
contrary, a much higher figure in the exposed region than in the control area.
Congenital abnormalities linked to TCDD administered in doses of from 1 to 3 micrograms per
kg have been found in experiments: cleft palates in mice, kidney deformities in mice and rabbits,
cardiac deformities in chicken embryos. The epidemiological surveys carried out in Seveso have
not demonstrated any increase in congenital deformities, as compared with normal statistics
gathered by the same methodology.
Many epidemiological studies have been carried out on human beings exposed to TCDD. Out of
seven studies published on employees subject to occupational exposure only one shows a rise in
deaths from cancer, particularly of the gastric kind. The increase in deaths from liver cancer
observed by Vietnamese doctors in the civilian population exposed to Agent Orange (a mixture
of herbicides: 2.4 D and 2.4.5 T, containing TCDD impurities) has not been proved
epidemiologically.
Swedish studies have pointed to an increase in the frequency of soft tissue sarcomas among
railway workers handling the same type of herbicides. These results are contested, as subsequent
studies have not found this association. The long term follow-up of the population that was
exposed in Seveso has not shown any increase in the cancer mortality rate, but it is still only
nine years since the incident. For the time being, there is still no real proof that TCDDs have a
carcinogenic effect on humans.
Accordingly, it would seem that, apart from chlorachne, metabolic induction and perhaps certain
types of cutaneous porphyria, TCDD has not resulted in any really worrying pathology in people
subjected to occupational or environmental exposure, of either an organ failure or involving
medium or long-term effects. In particular, there is no evidence of ill-effects on offspring of the
induction of cancer. In the absence of any definite appraisal of the risks to humans of this kind
of product and according to the published statistics from experiments carried out, it would be as
well to establish a medical surveillance system, to examine people exposed to PCDD and PCDF.
This system must employ epidemiological methods by introducing a control group, which will
facilitate the subsequent interpretation of results:
1. Attribution of exposure levels by synthesizing data from the questionnaire based on the
criteria for exposure and the data on toxicology (at the very least, the serum PCB levels; at best,
the relative blood and fat levels of PCDDs and PCDFs);
2. Initial clinical examination, repeated at 6 and 12 months intervals and then annually,
concentrating on the outer skin, neurological tests, measurements of the liver and the frequency
of recurring infections;
82
3. Complete medical history: Gamma-Glutamyl-transpeptidase (Gamma GT), serum glutamic
oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) (± urinary
glucaric acid), lipid profile, tests for microscopic haematuria, urinary porphyrins, examination of
the immune system: delayed immunity tests, lymphocyte typing, functional study of
lymphocytes.
83
Annex IX – List of trade names by country
84
Fenclor 42,54,54,70 Caffaro, Italy
Firemaster USA
Flammex UK
HFO 101 UK
85
Annex X – Glossary and abbreviations
Bioaccumulation:
Property of certain substances to accumulate in living organisms.
Biodegradation:
Decomposition of certain substances by living organisms (e.g., bacteria).
Biodegradation is one of the most important processes in the elimination of wastes.
Dielectric:
Substance which does not allow the passage of an electric current through it; non-
conducting. Synonym: insulation.
Lethal dose:
Necessary and sufficient quantity of a toxic substance to cause death.
Isomer:
Compounds with the same molecular formula but with different properties due to the atomic
structure of the molecule.
Mutagenesis:
Introduction of changes in a cell as a consequence of the action of chemical and physical
agents.
In biology, a mutation is an abrupt and permanent alternation in hereditary characteristics
caused by changes in the number or properties of the genes.
Permittivity:
Property of a dielectric to reduce the strength of an electrostatic force, expressed as a ratio
of its potential in a vacuum. System for measuring this reduction (Example: permittivity of
water is 80).
Pyrolysis:
The disassociation of a chemical compound into its constituents under the effect of heat
(without oxidation). Synonym: thermolysis
Retrofilling:
Operation consisting in the draining of a transformer of its PCBs, which may or may not be
followed by decontamination, and its refilling with a substitute fluid; decontamination is
defined as an operation to ensure a sustainable level of PCBs in a fluid of below 50 ppm.
Teratogenic: Said of substances which, through their action on the embryo, may cause
congenital malformations.
86
Abbreviations
ADR: European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road
CSC Convention: International Convention for Safe Containers, also: Container Safety
Convention
GEF: Global Environment Facility
IMCO: Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization (superseded by International
Maritime Organization)
IMDG: International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code
IMO: International Maritime Organization
ISO: International Organization for Standardization
NSA: National Standards Association
RID: Regulations concerning the International Transport of Dangerous Goods Rail
87
Annex XI –Stockholm Convention: Relevant Articles and annexes
Article 3
(a) Prohibit and/or take the legal and administrative measures necessary to eliminate:
(i) Its production and use of the chemicals listed in Annex A subject to the provisions
of that Annex; and
(ii) Its import and export of the chemicals listed in Annex A in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph 2; and
(b) Restrict its production and use of the chemicals listed in Annex B in accordance with
the provisions of that Annex.
(i) For the purpose of environmentally sound disposal as set forth in paragraph 1 (d) of
Article 6; or
(ii) For a use or purpose which is permitted for that Party under Annex A or Annex B;
(b) That a chemical listed in Annex A for which any production or use specific exemption
is in effect or a chemical listed in Annex B for which any production or use specific
exemption or acceptable purpose is in effect, taking into account any relevant
provisions in existing international prior informed consent instruments, is exported
only:
(i) For the purpose of environmentally sound disposal as set forth in paragraph 1 (d) of
Article 6;
(ii) To a Party which is permitted to use that chemical under Annex A or Annex B; or
(iii) To a State not Party to this Convention which has provided an annual certification
to the exporting Party. Such certification shall specify the intended use of the
chemical and include a statement that, with respect to that chemical, the importing
State is committed to:
a. Protect human health and the environment by taking the necessary measures to
minimize or prevent releases;
88
The certification shall also include any appropriate supporting documentation, such
as legislation, regulatory instruments, or administrative or policy guidelines. The
exporting Party shall transmit the certification to the Secretariat within sixty days
of receipt.
(c) That a chemical listed in Annex A, for which production and use specific exemptions
are no longer in effect for any Party, is not exported from it except for the purpose of
environmentally sound disposal as set forth in paragraph 1 (d) of Article 6;
(d) For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "State not Party to this Convention" shall
include, with respect to a particular chemical, a State or regional economic integration
organization that has not agreed to be bound by the Convention with respect to that
chemical.
3. Each Party that has one or more regulatory and assessment schemes for new pesticides or
new industrial chemicals shall take measures to regulate with the aim of preventing the
production and use of new pesticides or new industrial chemicals which, taking into
consideration the criteria in paragraph 1 of Annex D, exhibit the characteristics of persistent
organic pollutants.
4. Each Party that has one or more regulatory and assessment schemes for pesticides or
industrial chemicals shall, where appropriate, take into consideration within these schemes
the criteria in paragraph 1 of Annex D when conducting assessments of pesticides or
industrial chemicals currently in use.
5. Except as otherwise provided in this Convention, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to
quantities of a chemical to be used for laboratory-scale research or as a reference standard.
6. Any Party that has a specific exemption in accordance with Annex A or a specific
exemption or an acceptable purpose in accordance with Annex B shall take appropriate
measures to ensure that any production or use under such exemption or purpose is carried
out in a manner that prevents or minimizes human exposure and release into the
environment. For exempted uses or acceptable purposes that involve intentional release into
the environment under conditions of normal use, such release shall be to the minimum
extent necessary, taking into account any applicable standards and guidelines.
Article 5
Measures to reduce or eliminate releases from unintentional production
Each Party shall at a minimum take the following measures to reduce the total releases derived
from anthropogenic sources of each of the chemicals listed in Annex C, with the goal of their
continuing minimization and, where feasible, ultimate elimination:
(a) Develop an action plan or, where appropriate, a regional or subregional action plan
within two years of the date of entry into force of this Convention for it, and
subsequently implement it as part of its implementation plan specified in Article 7,
designed to identify, characterize and address the release of the chemicals listed in
Annex C and to facilitate implementation of subparagraphs (b) to (e). The action plan
shall include the following elements:
(i) An evaluation of current and projected releases, including the development and
maintenance of source inventories and release estimates, taking into consideration
the source categories identified in Annex C;
89
(ii) An evaluation of the efficacy of the laws and policies of the Party relating to the
management of such releases;
(iii) Strategies to meet the obligations of this paragraph, taking into account the
evaluations in (i) and (ii);
(iv) Steps to promote education and training with regard to, and awareness of, those
strategies;
(v) A review every five years of those strategies and of their success in meeting the
obligations of this paragraph; such reviews shall be included in reports submitted
pursuant to Article 15;
(vi) A schedule for implementation of the action plan, including for the strategies and
measures identified therein;
(b) Promote the application of available, feasible and practical measures that can
expeditiously achieve a realistic and meaningful level of release reduction or source
elimination;
(c) Promote the development and, where it deems appropriate, require the use of substitute
or modified materials, products and processes to prevent the formation and release of
the chemicals listed in Annex C, taking into consideration the general guidance on
prevention and release reduction measures in Annex C and guidelines to be adopted by
decision of the Conference of the Parties;
(d) Promote and, in accordance with the implementation schedule of its action plan, require
the use of best available techniques for new sources within source categories which a
Party has identified as warranting such action in its action plan, with a particular initial
focus on source categories identified in Part II of Annex C. In any case, the requirement
to use best available techniques for new sources in the categories listed in Part II of that
Annex shall be phased in as soon as practicable but no later than four years after the
entry into force of the Convention for that Party. For the identified categories, Parties
shall promote the use of best environmental practices. When applying best available
techniques and best environmental practices, Parties should take into consideration the
general guidance on prevention and release reduction measures in that Annex and
guidelines on best available techniques and best environmental practices to be adopted
by decision of the Conference of the Parties;
(e) Promote, in accordance with its action plan, the use of best available techniques and
best environmental practices:
(i) For existing sources, within the source categories listed in Part II of Annex C and
within source categories such as those in Part III of that Annex; and
(ii) For new sources, within source categories such as those listed in Part III of Annex
C which a Party has not addressed under subparagraph (d).
90
When applying best available techniques and best environmental practices, Parties should take
into consideration the general guidance on prevention and release reduction measures in Annex
C and guidelines on best available techniques and best environmental practices to be adopted by
decision of the Conference of the Parties;
(i) "Best available techniques" means the most effective and advanced stage in the
development of activities and their methods of operation which indicate the practical suitability
of particular techniques for providing in principle the basis for release limitations designed to
prevent and, where that is not practicable, generally to reduce releases of chemicals listed in Part
I of Annex C and their impact on the environment as a whole. In this regard:
(ii) "Techniques" includes both the technology used and the way in which the installation is
designed, built, maintained, operated and decommissioned;
(iii) "Available" techniques means those techniques that are accessible to the operator and
that are developed on a scale that allows implementation in the relevant industrial sector, under
economically and technically viable conditions, taking into consideration the costs and
advantages; and
(iv) "Best" means most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the
environment as a whole;
(v) "Best environmental practices" means the application of the most appropriate
combination of environmental control measures and strategies;
(vi) "New source" means any source of which the construction or substantial
modification is commenced at least one year after the date of:
b. Entry into force for the Party concerned of an amendment to Annex C where
the source becomes subject to the provisions of this Convention only by virtue
of that amendment.
(g) Release limit values or performance standards may be used by a Party to fulfil its
commitments for best available techniques under this paragraph.
91
Article 6
(ii) Products and articles in use and wastes consisting of, containing or contaminated
with a chemical listed in Annex A, B or C;
(d) Take appropriate measures so that such wastes, including products and articles upon
becoming wastes, are:
(ii) Disposed of in such a way that the persistent organic pollutant content is destroyed
or irreversibly transformed so that they do not exhibit the characteristics of
persistent organic pollutants or otherwise disposed of in an environmentally sound
manner when destruction or irreversible transformation does not represent the
environmentally preferable option or the persistent organic pollutant content is low,
taking into account international rules, standards, and guidelines, including those
that may be developed pursuant to paragraph 2, and relevant global and regional
regimes governing the management of hazardous wastes;
(iii) Not permitted to be subjected to disposal operations that may lead to recovery,
recycling, reclamation, direct reuse or alternative uses of persistent organic
pollutants; and
(iv) Not transported across international boundaries without taking into account
relevant international rules, standards and guidelines;
(e) Endeavour to develop appropriate strategies for identifying sites contaminated by chemicals
listed in Annex A, B or C; if remediation of those sites is undertaken it shall be performed in an
environmentally sound manner.
92
2. The Conference of the Parties shall cooperate closely with the appropriate bodies of the
Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their
Disposal to, inter alia:
(a) Establish levels of destruction and irreversible transformation necessary to ensure that the
characteristics of persistent organic pollutants as specified in paragraph 1 of Annex D are not
exhibited;
(b) Determine what they consider to be the methods that constitute environmentally sound
disposal referred to above; and
(c) Work to establish, as appropriate, the concentration levels of the chemicals listed in
Annexes A, B and C in order to define the low persistent organic pollutant content referred to in
paragraph 1 (d) (ii).
Annex A, part II
Polychlorinated biphenyls
(a) With regard to the elimination of the use of polychlorinated biphenyls in equipment
(e.g. transformers, capacitors or other receptacles containing liquid stocks) by 2025,
subject to review by the Conference of the Parties, take action in accordance with the
following priorities:
(i) Make determined efforts to identify, label and remove from use equipment
containing greater than 10 per cent polychlorinated biphenyls and volumes greater
than 5 litres;
(ii) Make determined efforts to identify, label and remove from use equipment
containing greater than 0.05 per cent polychlorinated biphenyls and volumes
greater than 5 litres;
(iii) Endeavour to identify and remove from use equipment containing greater than
0.005 percent polychlorinated biphenyls and volumes greater than 0.05 litres;
(b) Consistent with the priorities in subparagraph (a), promote the following measures to
reduce exposures and risk to control the use of polychlorinated biphenyls:
(i) Use only in intact and non-leaking equipment and only in areas where the risk from
environmental release can be minimized and quickly remedied;
(ii) Not use in equipment in areas associated with the production or processing of food
or feed;
(iii) When used in populated areas, including schools and hospitals, all reasonable
measures to protect from electrical failure which could result in a fire, and regular
inspection of equipment for leaks;
93
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph 2 of Article 3, ensure that equipment containing
polychlorinated biphenyls, as described in subparagraph (a), shall not be exported or
imported except for the purpose of environmentally sound waste management;
(d) Except for maintenance and servicing operations, not allow recovery for the purpose of
reuse in other equipment of liquids with polychlorinated biphenyls content above 0.005
per cent;
(e) Make determined efforts designed to lead to environmentally sound waste management
of liquids containing polychlorinated biphenyls and equipment contaminated with
polychlorinated biphenyls having a polychlorinated biphenyls content above 0.005 per
cent, in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 6, as soon as possible but no later than
2028, subject to review by the Conference of the Parties;
(f) In lieu of note (ii) in Part I of this Annex, endeavour to identify other articles containing
more than 0.005 per cent polychlorinated biphenyls (e.g. cable-sheaths, cured caulk and
painted objects) and manage them in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 6;
(g) Provide a report every five years on progress in eliminating polychlorinated biphenyls
and submit it to the Conference of the Parties pursuant to Article 15;
(h) The reports described in subparagraph (g) shall, as appropriate, be considered by the
Conference of the Parties in its reviews relating to polychlorinated biphenyls. The
Conference of the Parties shall review progress towards elimination of polychlorinated
biphenyls at five-year intervals or other period, as appropriate, taking into account such
reports.
94
Annex XII – List of contacts
95
Joint OCHA-UNEP Environment Unit
Palais des Nations, Door 2, 2nd floor
Geneva
Switzerland
Tel. (41 22) 917 11 72 /917 11 42
Fax: (41 22) 907 02 57
E-mail: [email protected]
96
Annex XIII – References
Technical Working Group of the Basel Convention: “Draft technical guidelines on the
environmentally sound management of POPs as wastes” 2002
Technical Working Group of the Basel Convention: “Draft technical guidelines on wastes
comprising or containing PCBs, PCTs and PBBs”, 2002 (Y10)
UNEP Chemicals: “PCB transformers and capacitors: From management to reclassification and
final disposal”, 2002
SBC No: 01/01: “First African Conference on the prevention and environemntally sound
management of hazardous waste stocks. Report and background documents”, 2001
UNEP Chemicals: “Study of currently available technologies for the destruction of PCBs
without incineration”, 2000
UNEP Chemicals: “Guidelines for the identification of PCBs and PCB-containing equipment”,
1999
SBC No. 97/005: “Technical guidelines on incineration on land” (D10), January 1997
SBC No. 97/006: “Technical guidelines on used oil re-refining or other re-uses of previously
used oil” (R9), January 1997
Basel Convention Highlights No. 96/001: “Guidance in developing national and/or regional
strategies for the environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes”, November 1997
97
See also the regulations, technical guidelines and national plans developed by a
number of parties to the Basel Convention de Bâle and available on the internet:
http://www.environment.gov.za/
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, South Africa
http://www.erin.gov.au
Environnement Australia
http://www.ec.gc.ca
Environnement Canada
http://europa.eu.int
European Commission
http://www.ine.gob.mx/
National Ecology Institute, Mexico
http://www.desechospeligrosos.org
Basel Convention Regional Coordinating Centre for Latin América and the Caribbean
http://www.epa.gov
Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America
98