Measuring Body Composition
Measuring Body Composition
REVIEW
Several aspects of body composition, in particular the TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING BODY
COMPOSITION
amount and distribution of body fat and the amount and Simple measurements or indices
composition of lean mass, are now understood to be Traditionally, skinfold thickness measurements
important health outcomes in infants and children. Their have been used to rank individuals in terms of
relative ‘‘fatness’’ or to assess the size of specific
measurement is increasingly considered in clinical practice; subcutaneous fat depots.2 Measurements are
however, paediatricians are often unsure as to which quick and simple to obtain in most age groups
techniques are appropriate and suitable for application in including young infants. In general, intraobser-
specific contexts. This article summarises the pros and cons ver and interobserver error are low compared to
between-subject variability, but in obese children
of measurement technologies currently available for accuracy and precision are poorer.
paediatric application. Simple techniques are adequate for The best use of skinfold thickness data is as
many purposes, and simple regional data may often be of raw values, where they act as reliable indices of
regional fatness. They can be converted into
greater value than ‘‘whole body’’ values obtained by more standard deviation score (SDS) format for long-
sophisticated approaches. itudinal evaluations. However, publication of
........................................................................... contemporary children’s skinfold reference data
remains a current research priority for assess-
ment of relative fatness in patients. Although the
B
ody composition and growth are key com- contemporary epidemic of obesity presents chal-
ponents of health in both individuals and lenges for body composition reference data,
populations. The ongoing epidemic of obe- whether individual patients are becoming more
sity in children and adults has highlighted the or less fat over time can only be assessed through
importance of body fat for short term and long comparison with a reference population. Such
term health.1 However, other components of data would therefore represent a ‘‘reference’’
body composition also influence health out- (what exists), but not a ‘‘standard’’ (what should
comes, and its measurement is increasingly exist).
considered valuable in clinical practice. Body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight/
The gold standard for body composition analysis height2) is also widely used as an index of
is cadaver analysis, so no in vivo technique may be relative weight, often expressed as SDS to take
considered to meet the highest criteria of accuracy. into account age and sex.3 In adults, BMI is
As discussed below, only multicomponent models predictive of clinical outcomes such as type 2
are now considered sufficiently accurate to act as diabetes; however, its predictive value for chil-
reference or criterion methods for the molecular dren and adolescents is less clear. BMI is a global
approach to measuring body composition (distin- index of nutritional status—used, for example, to
guishing fat and fat-free masses), against which categorise both overweight/obesity,4 and eating
other methods should be evaluated. Several disorders in combination with psychological
techniques are available, varying in complexity criteria5—but its relation with body composition
and ease of use, and each making assumptions per se is controversial.
that may affect its suitability for different condi- Although correlated with per cent fat,6 7 BMI
tions. A single technique is unlikely to be optimal cannot distinguish fat and lean masses, and
in all circumstances. A further important issue is there is a twofold range of variation in fatness for
that of the difficulty of validating techniques in a given BMI value in individual children.8 BMI
humans. In vivo techniques do not measure body may be particularly misleading in hospital
composition directly, but rather predict it from patients, where children apparently ‘‘malnour-
measurements of body properties. Thus all tech- ished’’ in terms of BMI actually have an increase
niques suffer from two types of error: methodo- in relative body fat and a severe decrease in lean
See end of article for logical error when collecting raw data, and error in
authors’ affiliations tissue (fig 1).9 This may be important for their
....................... the assumptions by which raw data are converted nutritional management, as the low BMI may
to final values. The relative magnitude of these lead to inappropriate overfeeding.
Correspondence to: errors varies between techniques.
Dr Jonathan Wells, MRC Waist circumference (WC) provides a simple
Childhood Nutrition The aim of this review is to discuss the measure of central fatness, which may be more
Centre, Institute of Child theoretical basis, assumptions, and advantages predictive of adverse outcomes such as lipid
Health, 30 Guilford Street, and disadvantages of available techniques. For
London WC1N 1EH, UK; more information, readers are strongly encour-
[email protected] Abbreviations: BIA, bioelectric impedance analysis; BMI,
aged to read the more detailed e-version of this body mass index; DXA, dual energy x ray
Accepted 24 March 2006 article on the journal website (http://www. absorptiometry; FFM, fat-free mass; FM, fat mass; TBW,
....................... archdischild.com/supplemental). total body water; WC, waist circumference
www.archdischild.com
Measuring body composition 613
profile or insulin resistance than total fat. In adults, waist– applied subsequently to predict TBW, which is converted to
hip ratio is independently associated with morbidity after FFM as described below.
adjustment for relative weight, such that the use of relative BIA incorporates various assumptions. The simplest model,
weight and body shape simultaneously gives a better involving hand–foot or foot–foot measurements made at 50
estimate of risk of morbidity than either alone.10 11 Similar KHz, relies most heavily on these assumptions, and therefore
findings are now emerging in children.12 Reference data on provides the crudest values for body composition. The relation
WC were obtained from a nationally representative sample of between bioelectrical data and TBW is influenced by the age
United Kingdom children in 1988.13 range investigated and other characteristics of the population.
Studies investigating the relation of WC with measures of Published BIA equations are population specific and perform
abdominal fatness obtained from magnetic resonance ima- poorly in healthy individuals, with errors in individuals
ging (MRI) have shown correlations consistently in the range typically ¡8% fat.23 Paediatric equations have been derived
of 0.5 to 0.8, although the associations with total abdominal for disease states such as obesity,24 cystic fibrosis,25 and HIV26;
fat tend be higher than those with intra-abdominal fat.14–16 In however, accuracy in individuals remains poor and measure-
contrast, studies reporting the association the between waist– ments may be confounded by clinical status, for example the
hip ratio and abdominal fat are inconsistent, and some find presence of oedema (see below). Foot–foot measurements,
no significant relation.14 17 though easier to obtain, have slightly poorer accuracy than
whole body measurements.27
Predictive techniques Despite these limitations, more sophisticated approaches to
Both skinfold thickness and bioelectric impedance measure- BIA have the potential both to improve accuracy and to
ments can be used to predict body composition. A generic increase the specificity of outcomes, and such progress is
problem with this approach is that it involves not one but two desirable given the ease with which measurements can be
predictions. First, raw measurements are used to predict a made in most age groups. For example, segmental measure-
body component or property using regression equations; ments of limbs or torso avoid the confounding effect of
second, this value is converted to final body composition data variability in body build, while multifrequency measure-
using further theoretical assumptions. In this section, we ments provide additional information about water distribu-
address the first of these issues. The second is then addressed tion. These are active areas of research but knowledge is
in the following section. currently insufficient to justify routine clinical application.
Several equations have been derived for the prediction of Conventional BIA analysis is inherently unsuited to the
per cent fat or body density from skinfold thickness prediction of body fatness in individuals, given that it
measurements.18–21 Such equations may not be valid in measures properties of the FFM only. Conventional single
populations other than those from which they were derived. frequency BIA does have high precision, providing electrode
Accuracy in individuals is invariably poor (limits of agree- placement is consistent, and hence could be suitable for
ment, ¡9% fat), and also varies in relation to body assessing short term changes in TBW within individuals.
fatness,22 23 making this approach unsuitable for longitudinal Given that body build is relatively consistent over short time
comparisons. periods even in growing children, such measurements could in
Prediction equations inevitably confound accurate raw turn indicate the direction of changes in FFM, but are unlikely
values with predictive error (standard error of the estimate). to quantify their magnitude with accuracy. In obesity clinics,
Hence, for assessment of fatness, it is better to leave skinfolds BIA might find a role in indicating whether changes in lean
in raw form or as SDS, where they act as reliable indices of mass are in the same direction as body weight, but should not
regional fatness, than to attempt prediction of total fat mass. be used to estimate change in fat mass. These issues should be
For assessment of total fat-free mass (FFM), an approach borne in mind as reference data for BIA data become available.
based on skinfold equations is particularly inappropriate, as At present, therefore, the value of BIA is primarily as an
no index of this component of weight is directly measured. epidemiological technique, where it is the only predictive
Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) measures impedance of technique that estimates lean mass.
the body to a small electric current. The generic theoretical
model treats the body as a single cylinder, with measure- Two-component techniques and models
ments made between electrodes placed manually on the wrist Two-component methods divide the body into fat mass (FM)
and ankle. Adjustment of bioelectrical data for height allows and FFM. They avoid two of the difficulties mentioned above,
estimation of total body water (TBW). In practice, this addressing both components of weight and avoiding the need
requires the empirical derivation of regression equations to predict total masses from regional or superficial proxies.
relating height2/impedance to TBW. These equations are then However, they remain dependent on theoretical assumptions,
such as constancy of the composition of FFM.
Between birth and adulthood, chemical maturation of lean
mass occurs, whereby the relative proportions of the three
BMI
main components (water, protein, and mineral) change with
Lean mass age and pubertal status. In two-component techniques, these
changes are addressed by assuming constant lean mass
Fat mass
characteristics for a given age and sex. Such assumptions
Subscapular may largely hold true for healthy subjects but are more
problematic in patients who may have deranged body
Triceps composition or hydration. Various methods are available.
0
–5 –4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Dual energy x ray absorptiometry
z Score Dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) was developed to
measure bone mineral mass, which is calculated from the
Figure 1 Data from infant patients with congenital myasthenia, a differential absorption of x rays of two different energies.
condition in which the development of connective tissue is impaired.
Despite extremely low BMI SDS, the patients have body fat levels higher
Because this calculation requires allowance for (and hence
than the average in healthy children. This paradox can be attributed to quantification of) overlying soft tissue, values of fat and FFM
extremely low levels of lean mass.9 Though underweight, energy intake is are also calculated for whole body scans, using instrument
not itself constraining their growth. specific algorithms.
www.archdischild.com
614 Wells, Fewtrell
www.archdischild.com
Measuring body composition 615
Table 1 Summary of assumptions underlying different techniques, their availability, and their main advantages and
disadvantages
Technique Assumptions made Reference data Availability* Advantages/disadvantages
Skinfolds – raw Constant skin protein content Y +++ For: simple measure of regional fat
Against: no information on lean mass
Skinfolds – equations Skinfolds 3 whole body N +++ For: simple and quick
fat Against: population specific, poor accuracy in individuals and groups
Body mass index Var weight = var fat Y +++ For: simple and quick
Against: measures nutritional status not body composition
Waist circumference Waist 3 central fat Y +++ For: simple, quick, robust measure of abdominal fat
Against: not so accurate as measure of internal visceral fat
DXA Constant attenuations of N ++ For: accurate for limb lean and fat
FFM and F Against: radiation exposure; whole body bias ?size, sex, fatness
Isotope dilution Constant Hffm N + For: only technique acceptable in all age groups
Against: delayed results; inaccurate if disease affects Hffm
TBK Constant K in cell mass N + For: measures functional component of body composition
Against: rarely available, poor accuracy for fatness
Multicomponent models Constant Dprot and Dmin, N + For: most accurate approach, all measurements acceptable
constant mineral composition Against: expensive, specialist research approach
www.archdischild.com
616 Wells, Fewtrell
Table 2 Illustration of the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques for measuring body composition in clinical
practice. The patient is a 14 year old girl referred for assessment and management of obesity with associated type 2 diabetes.
Which measurements might be useful in terms of baseline assessment and monitoring of body composition during weight loss?
Technique Advantages Disadvantages
Simple measurements
Skinfold thickness – Poor accuracy and precision in obesity
BMI Useful as a simple baseline and longitudinal measurement of Will not allow assessment of fat and lean masses and changes
relative weight in fat which may be more relevant in terms of metabolic risk
Waist circumference Useful baseline and longitudinal measurement. Centile charts
are available, and central fatness is of greater relevance to
metabolic risk
Predictive measurements
Skinfold thickness equations – Poor precision and accuracy—any error will be magnified by
predicting FM and FFM the use of prediction equations not derived from a
comparable (obese) population
Whole body BIA Could provide information on the direction of longitudinal Poor accuracy in absolute terms. Changes in body weight, the
changes in lean mass relative proportions of trunk and limbs, or FFM hydration with
treatment could introduce further errors
Two-component techniques
DXA Could be used to measure regional (limb) lean mass which Limited use for measuring baseline fat mass or longitudinal
could provide information on whether weight loss is changes in fat mass with weight loss, since measurements are
accompanied by changes in lean mass as well as fat mass known to be biased by body size (thickness)
Densitometry (BodPod) Could provide longitudinal data on both lean and fat mass Does not provide regional data.
since its accuracy is less likely to be affected by changes in
fatness.
Deuterium dilution Could estimate whole body lean mass Results may be affected by the small differences in FFM
hydration in obesity, but these have been quantified and could
be adjusted for. Small differences in FFM hydration would
introduce minor errors in the short term
BIA, bioelectric impedance analysis; BMI, body mass index; DXA, dual energy x ray absorptiometry; FFM, fat-free mass; FM, fat mass.
Conclusions: In practical terms, the techniques most useful in this patient are BMI and waist circumference for monitoring nutritional status and central fat
distribution. If available, DXA could be used for assessing changes in limb lean mass, and densitometry or deuterium could also provide longitudinal data for both
fat and lean mass.
Table 3 Illustration of the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques for measuring body composition in clinical
practice. The patient is a 10 year old boy with chronic renal failure on peritoneal dialysis. Which measurements might be useful
in terms of baseline assessment and monitoring of body composition? In this child, measurement of lean mass would be
potentially useful as a guide for basing nutritional requirements or drug doses, but measurements may be complicated by
oedema or variation in FFM hydration or both
Technique Advantages Disadvantages
Simple measurements
Skinfold thickness Useful index of regional fatness Poorer accuracy and precision in obese/oedematous
individuals
BMI Useful as a simple baseline and longitudinal measurement of Will not allow assessment of fat and lean masses and changes
relative weight in fat which may be more relevant in terms of nutritional/drug
requirements and metabolic risk
Waist circumference Useful baseline and longitudinal measurement. Centile Value may be limited in this child who is on peritoneal dialysis
charts are available, and central fatness is of greater
relevance to metabolic risk
Predictive measurements
Skinfold thickness equations – Poor precision and accuracy—any error will be to magnified
predicting FM and FFM by the use of prediction equations not derived from a
comparable population
BIA Could provide information on the direction of longitudinal Poor accuracy in absolute terms. Changes in body weight, the
changes in lean mass relative proportions of trunk and limbs, or FFM hydration will
introduce further errors*
Two-component techniques
DXA Could be used to measure regional (limb) lean mass which Limited use for measuring baseline fat mass or longitudinal
could provide information on which to base nutritional changes in fat mass, since measurements are known to be
requirements or drug doses biased by body size (thickness). In this child, skinfold
thicknesses may already provide information on regional
fatness
Densitometry (BodPod) Could provide longitudinal data on both lean and fat mass Variations in the hydration (and therefore density) of FFM in
since its accuracy is less likely to be affected by changes in this child will invalidate assumptions of constant density
fatness
Deuterium dilution Could estimate whole body lean mass if hydration known, Results for both TBW and FFM may be affected by variation in
and could potentially aid calculation of dialysis fluids hydration in this child
www.archdischild.com
Measuring body composition 617
www.archdischild.com