Population Viability Analysis
Population Viability Analysis
Part A
To make political decisions about the extent and type of forestry in a region it is important to
understand the consequences of those decisions. One tool for assessing the impact of forestry on the
ecosystem is population viability analysis (PVA). This is a tool for predicting the probability that a
species will become extinct in a particular region over a specific period. It has been successfully used
in the United States to provide input into resource exploitation decisions and assist wildlife managers
and there is now enormous potential for using population viability to assist wildlife management in
Australia’s forests. A species becomes extinct when the last individual dies. This observation is a
useful starting point for any discussion of extinction as it highlights the role of luck and chance in the
extinction process. To make a prediction about extinction we need to understand the processes that
can contribute to it and these fall into four broad categories which are discussed below.
Part B
A) Early attempts to predict population viability were based on demographic uncertainty whether
an individual survives from one year to the next will largely be a matter of chance. Some pairs may
produce several young in a single year while others may produce none in that same year. Small
populations will fluctuate enormously because of the random nature of birth and death and these
chance fluctuations can cause species extinctions even if, on average, the population size should
increase. Taking only this uncertainty of ability to reproduce into account, extinction is unlikely if the
number of individuals in a population is above about 50 and the population is growing.
B) Small populations cannot avoid a certain amount of inbreeding. This is particularly true if there
is a very small number of one sex. For example, if there are only 20 individuals of a species and only
one is a male, all future individuals in the species must be descended from that one male. For most
animal species such individuals are less likely to survive and reproduce. Inbreeding increases the
chance of extinction.
C) Variation within a species is the raw material upon which natural selection acts. Without
genetic variability, a species lacks the capacity to evolve and cannot adapt to changes in its
environment or to new predators and new diseases. The loss of genetic diversity associated with
reductions in population size will contribute to the likelihood of extinction.
D) Recent research has shown that other factors need to be considered. Australia’s environment
fluctuates enormously from year to year. These fluctuations add yet another degree of uncertainty to
the survival of many species. Catastrophes such as fire, flood, drought or epidemic may reduce
population sizes to a small fraction of their average level. When allowance is made for these two
additional elements of uncertainty the population size necessary to be confident of persistence for a
few hundred years may increase to several thousand.
Part C
Besides these processes, we need to bear in mind the distribution of a population. A species that
occurs in five isolated places each containing 20 individuals will not have the same probability of
extinction as a species with a single population of 100 individuals in a single locality. Where logging
occurs (that is, the cutting down of forests for timber) forest-dependent creatures in that area will be
forced to leave. Ground-dwelling herbivores may return within a decade. However, arboreal
marsupials (that is animals which live in trees) may not recover to pre-logging densities for over a
century. As more forests are logged, animal population sizes will be reduced further. Regardless of
the theory or model that we choose, a reduction in population size decreases the genetic diversity of a
population and increases the probability of extinction because of any or all of the processes listed
above. It is therefore, a scientific fact that increasing the area that is loaded in any region will increase
the probability that forest-dependent animals will become extinct.
ACADEMIC READING STRIDES IELTS TRAINING
Questions 28-31
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Part A of Reading Passage 1? In
boxes 28-31 on your answer sheet write:
YES if the statement agrees with the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this