German: Unit 4 Writing Mark Scheme
German: Unit 4 Writing Mark Scheme
GCSE
GERMAN
Unit 4 Writing
Mark scheme
4665
June 2014
Version/Stage: 1.0/Final
Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the
relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments
made at the standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was
used by them in this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers
the students’ responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same
correct way. As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’
scripts: alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for.
If, after the standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been
raised they are required to refer these to the Lead Assessment Writer.
It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and
expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark
schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of
assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular
examination paper.
Assessment Criteria
Content
Marks Criteria
Very Good
13-15 Fully relevant and detailed response to the task. Sound ability to convey
information clearly, express and explain ideas and points of view. Well organised
structure.
Good
10-12
Mostly relevant response to the task and shows ability to convey a lot of
information clearly, express and explain ideas and points of view.
Sufficient
7-9 Response to the task is generally relevant with quite a lot of information clearly
communicated. Points of view are expressed and ideas are developed.
Limited
4-6 Limited response to the task with some relevant information conveyed. Simple
opinions are expressed and there is some development of basic ideas.
Poor
1-3 Very limited response to the task with little relevant information conveyed. No
real structure.
Range Of Language
Marks Criteria
Vocabulary is appropriate to the basic needs of the task and structures are
3-4
mostly simple.
3
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
Accuracy
Marks Criteria
Largely accurate, although there may still be some errors especially in attempts at
5
more complex sentences. Verbs and tense formations are secure.
More accurate than inaccurate. Verb forms and tense formations are sometimes
3
unsuccessful. The intended meaning is clear.
2 Many errors which often impede communication. Verb forms are rarely accurate.
• The mark awarded for Range of Language must not be more than one band higher than
the mark awarded for Content. (See table below).
• The mark awarded for Accuracy must not be more than one band higher than the mark
awarded for Content. (See table below).
• If a mark is awarded for Content, this will inevitably lead to the award of a mark for
Range of Language and for Accuracy.
• If a mark of zero is awarded for Content, this will automatically result in a zero score for
Range of Language and for Accuracy.
4
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
Assessment issues
If more than 40 words have been used, examiners will ignore when awarding a mark,
the parts of the student’s response (ie the phrases or clauses) which use words noted
on the TPF beyond the first 40.
If a conjugated verb appears on the TPF, examiners will ignore the clause(s) where
that verb is used when awarding a mark for Range of Language and Accuracy. If the
sentence (with the conjugated verb discounted) still communicates, then it may be
counted towards the mark for Content. The same applies to the use of codes.
Visuals on Task Planning Forms are not permitted in June 2012 and beyond.
3. Must the title relate directly to the Contexts defined in the specification?
A student with the task ‘Home, local area and special occasions’ who writes nothing
about home area, for example, could be considered to have completed two thirds of the
5
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
task. The piece could therefore be eligible for the 10-12 band for Content, assuming
the piece fulfils the criteria for that band in other ways. This would still allow the student
access to all mark bands for language.
9. What if it is clear the student’s entire response is identical (ie exactly the same,
word for word) to model answers in a textbook or to the wording of tasks from
other students at the same centre?
• The quality not the quantity of work affects the assessment outcome.
• 200-350 words across both tasks if aiming at grades D-G, 400-600 if aiming at
grades A*-C, is for guidance only.
• Obviously, the shorter the assignment, the more difficult it becomes to meet
the upper bands of assessment criteria for CONTENT (and therefore other
categories).
• There is no upper limit on the number of words. The whole piece will be read
and marked by the examiner.
11. How does the CONTENT mark affect the marks for RANGE OF LANGUAGE and
ACCURACY?
0 0 0
All of the criteria should be considered when deciding on a mark, but the following guidelines
will prove particularly useful.
6
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
(a) CONTENT
GENERAL OVERVIEW
If the descriptor fits the piece exactly, then the examiner will award the middle mark in the
band. If there is strong evidence of the descriptors and/or the examiner had been
considering the band above, the highest of the three marks would be awarded. If there is
just enough evidence and/or the examiner had been considering the band below, then the
lowest mark in the band would be awarded.
13-15 marks
• Students provide a fully relevant and detailed response with almost all information
conveyed clearly and developed.
• They must offer ideas / opinions / points of view (minimum 2) and at least two of them
must be explained or justified.
• The piece should have a well organised structure, ie a sound ordering of ideas but
not necessarily a formal essay structure or an introduction, conclusion, etc.
10-12 marks
• The response will be mostly relevant and a lot of information will still be provided
and conveyed clearly and will generally be developed.
• There is a requirement to give and explain ideas / opinions / points of view (minimum
2)
7-9 marks
• The response will be generally relevant with quite a lot of information conveyed
clearly.
• There will still be evidence of an ability to develop ideas.
• There is a requirement to give opinions / points of view (minimum 2).
4-6 marks
• The response is limited but some relevant information will be conveyed.
• There will be some development of basic ideas.
• There is a requirement to give opinions (minimum 2). These could be very simple,
eg: ‘I like French. I like Spanish. France is good.’ = 3 simple opinions.
1-3 marks
• The response is very limited with little relevant information conveyed.
• There will be no real structure.
0 marks
• No relevant information is communicated in a coherent fashion. If zero is awarded for
Content, zero must also be awarded for Range of Language and Accuracy.
• The piece on a specific topic that strays into other areas (eg My School Routine should
not have long digressions on work experience or future career).
7
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
• The piece with a title covering a range of topics which only mentions one of them (eg
the title is School and Future Career but the student only mentions ‘school’).
• The piece which starts with a long preamble about the student which is not relevant to
the title.
• Work where there is a significant duplication of material across the two tasks
submitted. The same material cannot be credited twice. Examiners do not count
incidental and occasional overlap as duplication.
• Examiners are aware of the principle of balance. The piece on My holiday last summer
which includes a couple of sentences on what the student generally does/will do next
year is perfectly acceptable but if the student takes ⅓ of the piece talking about what
(s)he usually does and ⅓ of the piece dealing with next year’s plans then the work
should not be judged ‘fully relevant’ unless the student has been able to link this
material clearly to the title. Similarly with the task on My Work Experience where a
large part of the piece is taken up with what the student will do next year.
• Irrelevant material in the work is taken into account in awarding the marks, even if there
is sufficient relevant material to meet the recommended word length. For example, if a
student has written 600 words and 300 words are relevant to the title, the examiner
cannot simply ignore the 300 words of irrelevant material and deem the piece to be
fully relevant.
In practice, the vast majority of tasks will be fully relevant but many will not score in the
top band for Content because of other limitations. However, any piece which is not judged
fully relevant cannot be awarded a mark in the top band. Where it is obvious from the task
sheet that the bullet points have led the student into including irrelevant material, the
examiner will treat the lack of relevance as leniently as possible. Material which is deemed
irrelevant will be discounted when assessing Range of Language and Content.
• It is necessary to consider the amount of information given and the extent to which it is
developed. (Development of information/ideas means going beyond a basic response
to give additional detail.)
Note that a piece which does not reach the recommended length specified in the
specification (minimum 200 words across both pieces for grades G-D, minimum 400
words across both pieces for grades C-A*) is unlikely to score highly for Content, ie a
piece of less than about 100 words is likely to fall into the Limited or Poor band, a piece
of less than about 200 words is unlikely to score above the Sufficient band. However,
a piece of 200+ words will in theory have access to the full mark range. The examiner
is assessing primarily quality rather than quantity and precision and clarity of
expression are more important than the number of points made.
• There is no upper limit on the number of words. The whole piece will be read and
marked.
• Ideas, points of view and opinions must be viewed as one notion and are the same for
assessment purposes.
• To score 4+ for Content there must be at least two opinions/points of view/ideas
expressed.
8
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
• To score 10+ for Content, at least two opinions must be expressed and explained /
justified. At a basic level, explanation of an opinion is most likely to consist of a
statement of the opinion followed by weil …, but more able students may find more
subtle ways of justifying their opinions. For example, the explanation may come before
the opinion (see below).
Information/Opinions – Examples
13-15 marks Detailed response – York ist eine schöne, historische Stadt in
almost all information Nordengland. Ich wohne gern hier, da es
developed. A number viel zu tun und viel zu sehen gibt. Um York
(at least two) opinions wirklich zu geniessen, muss man ein
expressed and Interesse an Kultur und Geschichte haben
explained in some aber für junge Leute gibt es auch viele
detail. andere Unterhaltungsmöglichkeiten,
obwohl sie manchmal teuer sein können.
Wenn ich es mir leisten kann, gehe ich mit
Freunden ins Kino in York, weil ich
Filmkunst besonders liebe.
10-12 marks A lot of information- York ist eine schöne, historische Stadt in
generally developed. Nordengland. Ich wohne gern hier, da es
At least two opinions viel zu tun gibt. York ist immer interessant,
expressed and weil Kultur und Geschichte überall zu
explained. finden sind. Es gefällt mir auch, dass ich
leicht ins Kino, ins Theater oder in die
Kneipe gehen kann, obwohl das teuer ist.
Ich gehe besonders gern in die Kneipe in
York, weil ich dann immer Spaß mit
meinen Freunden habe.
7-9 marks Quite a lot of Ich wohne gern in York. Die Stadt ist
information. At least schön und interessant und es gibt viel zu
two opinions. Some tun. Ich gehe gern mit meinen Freunden
development of ins Kino im Stadtzentrum. Ich mag
information and Horrorfilme am liebsten.
opinions.
4-6 marks Limited response – Ich wohne in York. York ist gut und
some information – interessant. Ich mag York. Ich mag ins
some development. Kino gehen.
At least two basic
opinions expressed
1-3 marks Very limited – little Ich wohne in York. York ist in England.
information. Few or
no basic opinions
0 marks No relevant York is grub. Leeds was better.
information
communicated.
iv) Clarity of expression In order to gain a mark of 7+ for Content, there is a requirement
that information, opinions and development of points be conveyed clearly. The following
are the factors most likely to affect clarity of expression:
9
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
• incorrect choice of vocabulary/dictionary errors (eg was for war, grob for groß,
Fete for tun, etc)
• gross grammatical errors which hinder communication. Errors with verb endings,
particularly the wrong person of the verb, are particularly important here.
• omissions of words, phrases or whole sentences. These generally occur where the
student has attempted to learn by heart a draft version of the task and remembered it
imperfectly so that the sense of the sentence or paragraph is impaired.
• (occasionally) gross errors of punctuation
v) Organisation For the top Content band there is a requirement that the piece should have
a well organised structure. Pieces scoring in the bottom band may have no real
structure. Note the following points:
• A well organised structure means a sound ordering of ideas but not necessarily a
formal essay structure with an introduction, conclusion, etc.
• Students are, however, required to produce a continuous piece of writing rather than
a series of answers to the bullet points on the task sheet. A piece which cannot be
fully understood without reference to the task sheet is unlikely to demonstrate a well
organised structure.
• In the vast majority of cases, the requirement for a piece placed in the top band for
Content to have a well organised structure will not be an issue. It will be other factors
which determine whether it scores in the top band and many pieces placed in lower
bands will also be well organised.
13-15 Well organised In den Ferien fahre ich normalerweise im August mit
marks structure meiner Familie nach Mallorca. Wir verbringen zwei
Wochen da in einem Ferienhaus am Strand.
Trotzdem haben wir uns letztes Jahr entschieden nach
Frankreich zu fahren und wir haben in einem Hotel
gewohnt.
10-12 (Structure less In den Ferien fahre ich normalerweise im August mit
marks well organised – meiner Familie nach Mallorca. Wir verbringen zwei
(and can only be fully Wochen da in einem Ferienhaus am Strand.
below) understood by Wir sind nach Frankreich gefahren und haben in einem
reference to the Hotel gewohnt.
task sheet)
1-3 No real structure Ich fahre nach Mallorca. Wir sind nach Frankreich
marks gefahren. Ich fahre mit meiner Familie. Ich war in einem
Hotel.
CONTENT – SUMMARY
• Content not fully relevant Examiners will not award a mark above 12
• Structure obviously not well organised Examiners will not award a mark above 12
• Fewer than 2 opinions explained Examiners will not award a mark above 9
10
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
• Only one opinion or no opinions expressed Examiners will not award a mark
above 3
• Deciding on a mark within the Content band If the descriptor fits the piece exactly
examiners will award the middle mark in the band. If there is strong evidence of the
descriptors and/or examiners considered the band above, then examiners will award
the highest of the three marks; if there is only just enough evidence and/or examiners
considered the band below, then examiners will award the lowest mark.
In the top (Very Good) band, a performance which matches the descriptor exactly
will be awarded the middle mark of 14; the top mark (15) comfortably fulfils all of the
criteria and may even go beyond them.
GENERAL OVERVIEW
9-10 marks
• A variety of tenses must be used successfully. This means two or more tenses and
a minimum of one instance of a tense use which is other than the default tense used.
The tenses could come from the same time frame (for example the perfect and the
imperfect) but a greater range of tenses will add to the complexity of the language
used. An overall judgement needs to be made as to whether “verb tenses are used
11
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
7-8 marks
• Mainly successful use of complex sentences. The note above about what
constitutes complexity for the 9-10 band will also apply here.
• No specific requirement to use more than one tense but the use of different tenses
may constitute evidence of ‘more complex sentences.’
• There must be a good range of vocabulary, so students in this band will again be
trying to avoid repetition of the more common words.
5-6 marks
• There will be some attempts made at longer sentences using appropriate linking
words. At this level this will often mean repeated dependence on simple connectives
such as ‘and’ / ‘but’, though ‘because’ will also be found fairly frequently when
students attempt to explain ideas and points of view. Use of other forms of complex
sentences will often not be wholly successful.
• There should be some variety of vocabulary, though students will generally be using
a more basic range of vocabulary than in the higher bands and there may be more
repetition.
3-4 marks
• Language will be basic, with short, simple sentences. Attempts at longer sentences
and more difficult constructions will usually not be successful.
• Vocabulary will generally be appropriate to the basic needs of the task but will be
limited, with a lot of repetition and overuse of a few common verbs such as to be, to
have, to like, to go.
12
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
1-2 marks
• Little understanding of language structure shown with just the occasional short
phrase which is correctly used.
• Vocabulary will be very basic, with only isolated words correctly used. Vocabulary
will often be anglicised.
• use of synonyms, eg angenehm, fabelhaft, spitze rather than gut/sehr gut, halten für
rather than meinen, dass, vorziehen + infinitive rather than lieber mögen.
• use of ‘Higher Tier’/more sophisticated vocabulary – though this may vary somewhat
from centre to centre depending on course books used, etc.
• dictionary use – frequent poor dictionary use is likely to have a limiting effect on the
mark available
• good (and idiomatic) use of prepositions eg: vor einem Jahr , auf dem Lande
• reflexive, separable and inseparable verbs
• infinitive constructions, eg: um Fußball zu spielen, es gefällt mir Fußball zu spielen,
ohne es zu sehen
• use of relative clauses
• Subordinate clauses introduced by interrogatives, eg: die Stadt, wo ich wohne
• use of different modal verbs in one piece of work
• use of a variety of subordinating conjunctions – not just weil
• use of a variety of adverbial conjunctions with inversión of subject and verb
• use of comparative and superlative
• use of complex sentences and a range of tenses (v below)
• idiomatic use of language; for example a native speaker may use a limited range of
connectives but use idiomatic language throughout.
13
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
14
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
15
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
Examples
9-10 Als ich letztes Jahr mit meiner Familie in Mallorca war, bin ich fast jeden Tag auf den
marks Strand gegangen, wo ich mich gesonnt habe, weil ich auf Urlaub faul sein möchte. Wir
haben auch zwei schöne Ausflüge gemacht. Was mir besonders gefiel, war der
Besuch in Palma, da ich gut einkaufen konnte. Wenn ich sehr viel Geld hätte, würde
ich ein Ferienhaus in Mallorca kaufen, damit ich regelmäßig dahin fahren könnte.
7-8 Als ich letztes Jahr mit meiner Familie in Mallorca war, bin ich fast jeden Tag auf den
marks Strand gegangen. Ich habe mich gesonnt, weil ich auf Urlaub faul sein möchte. Wir
haben auch zwei Ausflüge gemacht. Am besten war der Besuch in Palma, da ich gut
einkaufen konnte. Ich muss mein Geld sparen, um wieder nach Mallorca zu fahren.
5-6 Ich war letztes Jahr in Mallorca und ich war oft auf dem Strand. Ich mag in der Sonne
marks liegen aber ich war auch in Palma und ich habe Souvenirs gekauft. Ich möchte wieder
gehen.
3-4 Letztes Jahr ich gehe zu Mallorca. Der Strand ist gut. Die Sonne ist gut. Palma ist gut
marks und ich Souvenirs kaufen. Ich zurück gehst.
1-2 Ich flug zu Mallorca. Strand was gut. Sonne is super. Palma was super. Ich gekaufen
marks Souvenirs. Ich zurücke.
(c) ACCURACY
GENERAL OVERVIEW
NB. Range of tenses is assessed under RANGE OF LANGUAGE. The range of tenses is not
considered when assessing Accuracy.
5 marks
• Largely accurate.
• Major errors only usually appear in complex structures.
• There may be some minor errors (eg gender).
• Verbs and tenses are secure.
4 marks
• Errors occur but the piece is generally accurate. Mistakes made will not generally
impede communication.
• Verbs and tenses are usually correct.
3 marks
• More accurate than inaccurate, though there will often be fairly frequent errors.
• The intended meaning is clear.
• Verbs and tenses are sometimes unsuccessful.
16
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
2 marks
• Many errors.
• Mistakes often impede communication.
• Verbs are rarely accurate.
1 mark
• Frequent errors.
• Mistakes regularly impede communication.
• Limited understanding of basic linguistic structures.
• There are only 5 marks available to cover the whole range of ability (ie 8
grades). Each mark will therefore cover a relatively wide range of performance and
a mark of 5 will represent more than an A* performance.
• The mark awarded for Accuracy must not be more than one band higher than
the mark awarded for Content.
• Examiners are not over-influenced by the standard of accuracy in the last part of a
piece – this will probably be the most inaccurate bit. If in doubt, they re-read the
whole piece.
• A repeated major error (ie one where communication is impeded) should be
considered each time it occurs. Repeated minor errors will incur no further
penalty after the first occurrence.
17
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
Examples
5 marks Die Schule war ein Gymnasium und die erste Stunde hat um halb acht begonnen. Ich finde
das war früh. Die pause war um halb elf. Ich finde dass das in Ordnung war. Am mittag
habe ich bei meinem Austauschpartner zu hause gegessen und am Freitag habe ich eine
AG gemacht für eine Stunde.
4 marks Wir durften um zwei Uhr nach Hause gehen, weil die Schule dann aus war. Ich habe
mittags bei meinem Austauschpartner gegessen. Es war schön. Ich musste kein AGs
gemacht aber ich habe golf mit meinem Austauschpartner gespeilt.
3 marks Ich versuche überrenden mein Freundes zu mull trennen und recyclen altpapier.Ich hoffe
werdst du machen mein Beispiel und werdst du Energie sparen. Wir haben die welt
verletzen aber wir können befestigen die welt.
2 marks Ich versuche überrenden mein Freundes zu mull trennen. Ich hoffen du gemachtest mein
Biespeil und gerettest Energie. Wir bin können befestigen die welt.
1 mark Ich besuchen überrenden freunds zu mull. Bist du hoffen mein Exemplar is gut. Wie musst
rettet das planet.
0 marks I schinken gut with frends ablehnen. Wie can zervalatwurst das weltbank.
Convert raw or scaled marks into marks on the Uniform Mark Scale (UMS) by using the
link below.
Grade boundaries and cumulative percentage grades are available on the Results statistics
page of the AQA Website.
An example of the Evidence Checker used by the examiners is reproduced overleaf for
information.
18
MARK SCHEME – GCSE German – 46654 – June 2014
19 of 19