Scribd
Upload
453 views

Typical Spacing Equip CCPS

This document provides commentary and notes for tables containing typical spacing distances between buildings, process equipment, and property lines. The tables are based on potential fire and explosion concerns but spacing may be reduced or increased depending on site-specific hazards and risks. Distances are measured horizontally between closest edges. Closer spacing than shown in the tables is allowed if appropriate risk reduction measures are considered.

Uploaded by

Peddy Nesa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
453 views

Typical Spacing Equip CCPS

This document provides commentary and notes for tables containing typical spacing distances between buildings, process equipment, and property lines. The tables are based on potential fire and explosion concerns but spacing may be reduced or increased depending on site-specific hazards and risks. Distances are measured horizontally between closest edges. Closer spacing than shown in the tables is allowed if appropriate risk reduction measures are considered.

Uploaded by

Peddy Nesa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Appendix A.

Typical Spacing Tables

The following comments should be applied to the Tables contained in Appen-


dix A.
NA = Not applicable. No measurable distance is appropriate.
NM = No minimum spacing requirement has been established for rea-
sons of fire protection. Use engineering judgment for spacing and
provide access for fire fighting and maintenance.
S = Spacing is based on security needs and not on fire, explosion, or
toxic concerns.
CAUTION:
1. Tables A through E include typical spacing values. Explanatory text
is included in Chapters 5 and 6.
2. The typical spacing distances cited in Tables A through E are based
on potential fire consequences (explosions and toxic concerns may
require greater spacing). Variations in spacing may be warranted
based on site-specific hazards and risks. Distances may be reduced
or increased based on risk analysis or when additional layers of pro-
tection are implemented (such as: fire protection or emergency shut-
down systems).
3. These tables are not applicable to enclosed process units.
Miscellaneous typical spacing values are included in Table E.
NOTES:
1. Distances are measured horizontally.
2. Typical horizontal distances between buildings, process equipment,
and property lines are shown and apply to the closest edge to closest
edge dimensions.
3. Where unusual conditions require closer spacing, appropriate risk
reduction measures should be considered.

139
Appendix A. Typical Spacing Tables 143
144 Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout
Appendix A. Typical Spacing Tables 145

ter

.
146 Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout

You might also like