Scribd
Upload
29 views

10 Conclusion: 94.45% 69.95KPP H 71.13 BPD 76.90 Bbl/day 92.48% 65.11KPP H 70.25 BPD 74.75 Bbl/day

1. The document discusses model predictive control (MPC) and its advantages over proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control for interactive multivariable process systems. 2. MPC is able to handle constraints more effectively than PID, as shown through a case study where MPC constrained a reflux valve position and reboiler valve position between low and high limits. 3. The model used in MPC provided high accuracy because it was validated using various identification methods, and MPC produced better results than PID control for the interactive distillation column process.

Uploaded by

Garabig
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views

10 Conclusion: 94.45% 69.95KPP H 71.13 BPD 76.90 Bbl/day 92.48% 65.11KPP H 70.25 BPD 74.75 Bbl/day

1. The document discusses model predictive control (MPC) and its advantages over proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control for interactive multivariable process systems. 2. MPC is able to handle constraints more effectively than PID, as shown through a case study where MPC constrained a reflux valve position and reboiler valve position between low and high limits. 3. The model used in MPC provided high accuracy because it was validated using various identification methods, and MPC produced better results than PID control for the interactive distillation column process.

Uploaded by

Garabig
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

69.95KPP 76.90 [ 3] Bѐla G.

Lipták, Instrument Engineers’ handbook :


218.910 F 94.45%
H
71.13 BPD
Bbl/day
65.11KPP 74.75
Process Control, Third Edition, 1995.
217.620 F 217.620 F 92.48%
H
70.25 BPD
Bbl/day
[ 4] B. Wayne Bequette, ‘Process Control, Modelling
and Simulation’, Prentice Hall of India Pvt.
Ltd.2003.

[ 5] S. Joe Qin, Thomas A. Badgwell, ‘A survey


of industrial model predictive control technology’,
Control Engineering Practice 11 (2003) 733-764.

[ 6] Sudhir Panditrao, Sudhir Agashe, Prashant


Shevgaonkar, ‘Model Predictive Control of Pilot
Spray Dryer Unit Designed and implemented for an
Educational Institute ’.

[ 7] Dale E. Seborg, Thomas. F. Edgar, Duncan A.


Mellichamp, ‘Process Dynamics and
Control’,Second Edition, 2004.

[ 8] W.K. Wojsznis (2005), Model Predictive Control


and Optimization.

[ 9] Tri Chandra S.Wibowo, Nordin Saad, and Mohd


Noh Karsiti, ‘System Identification of an Interacting
Series Process for Real-Time Model Predictive
Control’, 2009 American Control Conference Hyatt
Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-
12, 2009.

[ 10] Vu Trieu Minh, Wan Mansor Wan


Figure7: How better Interactive process is handled by MPC over Muhamad, ‘Model Predictive Control of a
PID Condensate Distillation Column’, International
Journal of Systems Control (Vol. 1-2010/ Iss.1).

10 CONCLUSION [ 11] Saniye Ay and Suleyman Karacan,


Model generated in MPC is of high accuracy, as it is ‘Decoupling Constrained Model Predictive Control
of Multi-component Packed Distillation Column’,
rightly confirmed from the methods used in Model World Applied Sciences Journal 13, 2011.
Verification. Further MPC gives better results over PID in
the application of Interactive Multivariable Control [ 12] Yucai Zhu, Rohit Patwardhan, Stephen B.
System. As seen from above results MPC was able to Wagner, Jun Jhao, ‘Toward a low cost and high
handle constraints very effectively as in this case Reflux performance MPC: The role of system
Valve Position and Reboiler Valve Position was identification’, Computers and Chemical
Engineering 51 (2013) 124-135.
constrained between low limit and high limit.
[ 13] Books on-line, DeltaV DCS Documentation,
Emerson Process Management, USA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
We are very thankful to Emerson Export
Engineering Centre for giving us opportunity. We would
like to thank Mr. Koustubh Palnitkar and Mr. Archis Labhe
for technical assistance. We are very grateful to Mr. Sachin
Soman for moral inspiration while carrying out this project.

REFERENCES:

[ 1] Willian L. Luyben, ‘Process Modelling, Simulation


and Control for Chemical Engineers’, 1990.

[ 2] Warren L. McCabe, Julian C. Smith, Peter


Harriott, ‘Unit Operations of Chemical engineering’,
Mc GRAW-HILL International Editions, Chemical
and Petroleum Engineering Series, Fifth
Edition,1993.

You might also like