Lecture Notes in Curriculum Development
Lecture Notes in Curriculum Development
Activity 1: In the courses that you are currently taking, identify practices that can be considered
as following the traditional orientation and those that are progressive in orientation.
Give specific examples or illustrations
2. Historical Foundations
a. Franklin Bobbit (1876-1956) – presented curriculum
as a science that emphasizes on students’ need.
Curriculum prepares students for adult life. To Bobbit,
objectives with corresponding activities should be
grouped and sequenced. This can only be done if
instructional activities and tasks are clarified
b. Werret Charters (1875-1952) – like Bobbit, to
Charters curriculum is a science. It gives emphasis on
student’s needs. The listing of objectives and matching
these with corresponding activities ensures the content
or subject matter is related to objectives. The subject
matter and the activities are planned by the teacher
c. William Kilpatrick (1871-1965) – curricula are
purposeful activities which are child-centered. The
purpose of the curriculum is child development and
growth. The project method was introduced by
Kilpatrick where teacher and student plan the
activities. The curriculum develops social
relationships
d. Harold Rugg (1886-1960) – curriculum should develop
the whole child. With the statement of objectives and
related learning activities, curriculum should produce
outcomes. He emphasized social studies and the teacher
plans curriculum in advance
e. Hollis Caswell (1901-1989) – sees curriculum as
organized around social functions on themes, organized
knowledge and learner’s interest. Caswell believes that
curriculum is a set of experiences. Subject matter is
developed around social functions and learners’ interest
f. Ralph Tyler (1902-1994) – as one of the hallmarks of
curriculum, he believes that curriculum is a science and
an extension of school’s philosophy. It is based on
student’s needs and interest. To Tyler, curriculum is
always related to instruction. Subject matter is organized
in terms of knowledge, skills and values. The process
emphasizes problem solving. The curriculum aims to
educate generalists and not specialists
Historical development shows the different changes in the purposes, principles and content
of the curriculum. The different changes are influenced by educational philosophy,
psychology and pedagogical theories. This implies that curriculum is ever changing
putting in knowledge and content from many fields of disciplines.
Midterms Exam
3. Psychological Foundations – Psychology provides a basis for the teaching and learning
process. It unifies elements of the learning process and some
of the questions which can be addressed by psychological
foundations of education.
a. Behaviorist psychology – dominated the 20th Century psychology
– Includes among others connectionism of Edward Thorndike, which
influenced both Ralph Tyler and Hilda Taba who are considered to
be one of the well known curricularists
– Ivan Pavlov’s classical conditioning and B.F. Skinner’s operant
conditioning were all behaviorists in character
– Albert Bandura’s modeling and observation theory, is also related to
behavior
– Among the behaviorists, Robert Gagne’s hierarchical learning or
sets of behavior, 1987, and five learning outcomes became classic
examples.
1. Intellectual Skills or “knowing how” to categorize and use
symbols, forming concepts and problem solving
2. Information or “knowing what” knowledge about facts, dates and
names
3. Cognitive strategies or learning skills
4. Motor skills
5. Attitudes, feelings and emotions learned through experiences
– To behaviorists, learning should be organized in order that students
can experience success in the process of mastering the subject
matter. The method is introduced in a step by step manner with
proper sequencing of task which is viewed by other educational
psychologists as simplistic and mechanical
b. Cognitive Psychology – how do learner’s store information? How do they retrieve data and
generate conclusions? Are the questions asked by cognitive
psychologists
– Cognitive psychologists focus their attention on how individuals
process information and how they monitor and manage thinking
– Among the advocates of cognitive psychology are Jean Piaget for his
Cognitive Development stages, Lev Vygostky for his Social
Constructionism, Howard Gardner for his Multiple Intelligences,
Felder and Silverman for their Learning Styles and Daniel Goleman
for Emotional Intelligences
– Cognitive theorists, learning constitutes a logical method for
organizing and interpreting learning
– Learning is rooted in the tradition of subject matter and is similar to
the cognitive development theory
– Teachers use a lot of problem and thinking skills in teaching learning
and exemplified by practices like reflective thinking, creative
thinking, intuitive thinking and discovery learning
c. Humanistic Psychology – humanist psychologists are concerned with how learners can
develop their human potential
– Traditional psychologists do not recognize humanistic
psychology as a school of psychology. However, observers view
humanistic psychology as the third force learning theory after
behaviorism and cognitive development. It is built on Gestalt
psychology where learning can be explained in terms of the
wholeness of the problem and where the environment is
changing and the learner is continuously reorganizing his or her
perceptions. Aside from the theory of Gestalt, Abraham’s
Maslow’s Theory of Human Needs for self actualizing person’s
and Carl Roger’s Non-directive lives, also fall under humanistic
psychology
– Among the humanistic psychology, curriculum is concerned with
the process not the products; personal needs not the subject
matter; psychological meaning and environmental situations
Psychology has a great influence in the curriculum. Learners are not machines and the
mind is not a computer. Humans are biological beings affected by their biology and their
cultures. The psychological foundations will help curriculum makers in nurturing a more
advanced, more comprehensive and complete human learning
Reaction: Are the aims of the Education Act of 1982 for tertiary education being practiced by
ASIST? If yes in what way? If not how? (Suggestions/Recommendation)
School’s Vision – is a clear concept of what the institution would like to become in the future
– Provides the focal point or unifying element according to which the school
staff, faculty, students perform individually or collectively
– Is the guiding post around which all education efforts including curricula
should be directed
– Is very ambitious but that is a characteristic of a vision
Ex. A center of professional excellence and quality education in the
Province of Abra providing opportunities to young Abrenios to
acquire knowledge, develop skills and form attitudes needed for
national development and global competitiveness.
School’s Mission – spells out how it intends to carry out its vision
– Targets to produce the kind of persons the student will become after
having been educated over a period of time
Ex. The college shall primarily provide technological and vocational
education and shall inspire leadership in the field of agriculture,
forestry, home technology, agricultural education and industry,
through scientific research and extension, and such other courses as
the Board of trustees may deem wise and necessary.
School’s Goals – are broad statements or intents of the vision and mission which is to be
accomplished
– Source data in making goals include the learners, the society and the fund
of knowledge
Example:
1. To produce quality graduates who are locally and globally competitive;
2. To disseminate and showcase client-responsive technologies and other
solutions to development problems;
3. To develop/operate new knowledge and verify client-oriented
technologies and other solutions to local and national development
problems;
4. To develop and operate Income generating Projects (IGP’s) to augment
the finance of the college;
5. To realize ASIST as a dynamic and responsive learning and performing
organization efficiently and effectively managing its resources.
In curriculum, these goals are made simple and specific for the attainment of each learner,
which are called “educational objectives”
Criteria in the Selection of Subject Matter content or knowledge for the curriculum
1. Self-sufficiency – according to Scheffler (1970) the prime guiding principle for content
selection is helping the learners to attain maximum self-sufficiency in
learning but in the most economical matter – means less teaching effort
and educational resources, less learner’s effort but more results and
effective learning outcomes
2. Significance – when content or subject matter will contribute to basic ideas, concepts,
principles and generalization to achieve the overall aim of the curriculum,
then it is significant. It is also significant if it will develop learning abilities,
skills, processes and attitude. Subject matter is significant if it will develop
the cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills of the learner; and if the
cultural aspects are also considered
3. Validity – authenticity of the subject matter is its validity. With information explosion,
oftentimes, knowledge selected for school content may become obsolete. Thus,
subject matter should be checked or verified at regular intervals, to determine if
the content that was originally continues to be
4. Interests – for a learner-centered curriculum, this is the key criterion because a learner will
value the content if it is meaningful to him or her. Students’ interests should be
considered and adjusted taking into consideration maturity, prior experiences,
educational and social value of their interest among others
5. Utility – usefulness of the content or subject matter may be relative to the learner who is
going to use it – maybe either be for the present or the future. Questions like “will
I use it in my future job?”, “will it add meaning to my life or develop my human
potential?” or “will the subject matter be useful in solving my current problems?”
6. Learnability – subject matter in the curriculum should be within range of the experiences of
the learners. Optimal placement and appropriate organization and sequencing of
contents are the two ways by which these can be done
7. Feasibility – can the subject matter or content be learned within the time allowed, resources
available, expertise of the teacher and the nature of the learner? Content selection
should be considered within the existing reality in schools, in society and
government
Organizing Different Learning Contents (Palma, 1992)
1. Balance – curriculum content should be fairly distributed in depth and breadth of the
particular learning area or discipline which ensures that the level or area will not
be overcrowded or less crowded
2. Articulation – when each level of subject matter is smoothly connected to the next, glaring
gaps and wasteful overlaps in the subject matter will be avoided – teamwork
among teachers is needed
3. Sequence – is the logical arrangement of the subject matter
– refers to the deepening and broadening of the content as it is taken up in the
higher level
4. Integration – means that horizontal connections are needed in subject areas that are similar
so that learning will be related to one another
– help the learner get a wholistic or unified outlook in life
5. Continuity – learning requires a continuing application of knowledge, skills, attitudes or
values so that these will be used in daily living
– refers to the constant repetition, review and reinforcement of learning
Aims Content
/
Objectiv Subject
es Matter
Methods
Evaluati /
on Strategi
es