Implementation of IFRS in Saudi Arabia
Implementation of IFRS in Saudi Arabia
Introduction
Recently, Saudi Arabia joined other countries in implementing the International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS). Presently, except for companies in the insurance and banking
sector, other companies in Saudi Arabia must follow the standards of accounting practiced in
KSA as required by Saudi Organization for Certified Public Accountant (SOCPA). Also, the
Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) governs the firms in the banking and insurance
sector (Deloitte, 2016). Studies regarding the implementation of IFRS in Saudi Arabia are quite
limited. Some studies have attempted to address the fundamental problems experienced in the
process of implementing IFRS (Almotairy & Alsalman, 2011). According to these authors, Saudi
Arabia stands out among the GCC countries not in need of IFRS for all its beneficiary
companies. In fact, in support of this statement, a previous study has revealed that only
companies enlisted with the Saudi Arabia Stock Exchange are eligible to implement IFRS while
others are not allowed (Alqahtani, 2010). The companies that have been allowed must follow the
regulations of the Saudi Accounting Standards (SAS) as issued by SOCPA. With other
researches having looked at the challenges of implementing IFRS as well as the companies
allowed to use it, this paper takes another direction of looking at the impact of implementing
IFRS on businesses.
One impact of implementing IFRS is that it will increase the level of transparency in business
through the introduction of accurate financial statements. Also, the experiences of implementers
during the transitions period of a country can be of help to other companies wanting to do the
same. This can be seen using an early case in Turkey where companies with publicly traded
shares, traded companies, and publicly owned companies were advised to implement IFRS
(UNCTAD, 2007). After these companies implemented the IFRS, it was noted that transparency
increased within their dealings. Also, they would serve as examples to other companies who
wanted to implement IFRS later on through sharing their experiences with them. Contrary to this,
still on Turkey’s case, the implementation of IFRS by companies led to learning institutions
changing the curriculum to include courses of IFRS in the undergraduate and post graduate
session. This is because of the complaints companies used to raise claiming that training
employees on the use of IFRS was quite costly to them and therefore it would save costs if
reporting. This would lead to a positivity in the relationship within the different sectors of a firm.
terms of disclosing statements of finance. Finally, Saudi Arabia is likely to enjoy a stronger
linkage between disclosure and liquidity levels in the sector of banking after implementing IFRS
Moving on, efficient IFRS implementation by Saudi Arabia is likely to see more
reduction in forecasting errors and dispersion by the companies that implement IFRS. According
environmental information of a financial analysts helps to reduce the forecast errors and
dispersion for countries with accounting standards that seemed different with those of IFRS.
Also, the forecast errors are likely to reduce further for companies with stronger appeal for
transparency in reporting financial matters. Such findings show the essential roles enforcement
bodies play and other incentives at firm-level to establish the impact of IFRS on a forceful
platform of operations.
The other impact of implementing IFRS in Saudi Arabia is that it would lead to a
According to Hellman (2011), the empirical research from Sweden suggested that global
accounting standards seemed to have high quality under IFRS implementation and would lead to
other benefits revolving around market-related economy, increased value of the stock market,
liquidity increase, and a reduced rate of capital. However, Hellman noted that a widespread
implementation of IFRS may not lead to the desired changes in the practices of local accounting
since the legally implemented IFRS versions might not completely correspond to the IFRS that
IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) issues because the existence and
The final impact of implementing IFRS in Saudi Arabia revolves around the
boarder in great numbers. DeFond (2011) observed that the components of IFRS leads to
uniformity in accounting standards that later improve the comparability in the financial
statements. The study of DeFond evaluated the changes likely to occur in a foreign investment
firm with mutual firms after implementing IFRS. It was established that there is an increase in
mutual fund ownership at foreign level since IFRS contributes to enhanced comparability. Also,
IFRS leads to more foreign investment in with a history of strong credibility of implementation.
In conclusion, the level of impact due to IFRS implementation in every country across
the world has been shown to vary based on the location of a country and the firms found there.
For Saudi Arabia, it has been established that IFRS implementation is likely to come with
Almotairy, O. S., & Alsalman, A. M. (2011). Challenges facing adopting IFRS in Saudi Arabia.
Byard, D., Li, Y., & Yu, Y. (2011). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial
Daske, H., & Gebhardt, G. (2006). International financial reporting standards and experts’
DeFond, M., Hu, X., Hung, M., & Li, S. (2011). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on
economics, 51(3), 240-258.
Deloitte. (2016). Adoption of IFRS in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved 20 October 2019, from
https://www2.deloitte.com/bh/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/on-malta/adoption-of-
IFRS-in-sa.html
Hellman, N. (2011). Soft adoption and reporting incentives: A study of the impact of IFRS on
83.
Financial Reporting Standards: Case study of Turkey, Trade and Development Board