Scribd
Upload
21 views

Interim Report Structure For FYP 2020-21

This document provides a checklist for evaluating the structure and content of an interim report. It addresses whether the introduction, background, referencing, work to date, further work, and review sections are adequately addressed and structured. It also provides questions for assessing progress and getting back on schedule if the student is behind in their work.

Uploaded by

Tabsumm Khadkaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views

Interim Report Structure For FYP 2020-21

This document provides a checklist for evaluating the structure and content of an interim report. It addresses whether the introduction, background, referencing, work to date, further work, and review sections are adequately addressed and structured. It also provides questions for assessing progress and getting back on schedule if the student is behind in their work.

Uploaded by

Tabsumm Khadkaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Interim Report Structure

Introduction, Background, and Referencing


● Are the sections correctly titled and numbered

● Does the introduction fully introduce the subject of the report?

● Does the introduction introduce the structure of the report?

● Does the background give confidence that the student has fully read around the subject?

● Does the background show an appropriate depth and breadth of reading around the subject?

● Does the background section demonstrate a full understanding of current thinking in


relation to the subject area?

● Is the background section fully and correctly referenced?

● Could the text be presented more efficiently by better use of references in place of
reproducing information in the text?

● Does the background section flow smoothly?

● Are references correctly presented?

Work to Date
● Is/ Are the chapter/ chapters appropriately titled?

● Does the text have a coherent and logical flow?

● Is all work done to date fully and efficiently presented?

● Does the presentation show a full and detailed consideration of the design and development
of the system to date?

Further Work
● Is there a detailed and coherent plan of the work still to be done?

● Is this presented in a logically ordered fashion?

● Is there a level of confidence that this can be completed in the time remaining?
Review
● Has the student assessed their progress?

● Is the assessment realistic and does it match with evidence from supervision meetings?

If the student is behind schedule:

● Has the student analyzed why they are behind?

● Has the student put in place a sensible plan to get back on target?

● Does the plan seem realistic?

You might also like