See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/318787243

ANALYSIS OF FAULTS AND TRANSIENT STABILITY IN MULTI PHASE SYSTEM

Article · June 2016

CITATIONS READS

0 289

3 authors, including:

Pramod Kumar Baghmar

Christian College of Engineering & Technology
1 PUBLICATION   0 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Pramod Kumar Baghmar on 31 July 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 e-ISSN (O): 2348-4470
Scientific Journal of Impact Factor (SJIF): 4.14
p-ISSN (P): 2348-6406

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research

Development
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016

ANALYSIS OF FAULTS AND TRANSIENT STABILITY IN MULTI PHASE

SYSTEM
Pramod Kumar Baghmar1, Payal Roy2, Ashish Dewangan 3
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, CCET, Bhilai (India) [email protected]
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, CCET, Bhilai (India) [email protected]
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, CCET, Bhilai (India) [email protected]

Abstract — High phase order transmission system is being considered a viable alternative for increasing the power
transmission capability of overhead electric power transmission over existing right-of-way. This paper presents the faults
and transient stability analysis of six-phase transmission system. In this context, fault analysis has been conducted on the
Goudey-Oakdale 2-bus test system. The results of these investigations are presented in the form of typical time responses.
The PSCAD/EMTDC is used for the simulation studies.

Keywords- Power transmission, power transmission fault, fault currents, power system simulation, PSCAD, Six phase,
three phase, transmission line, overhead line .
I. INTRODUCTION

The future growth of power systems will rely more on increasing capability of already existing transmission systems,
rather than on building new transmission lines and power stations, for economical and environmental reasons. The
external pressure have mounted on the power transmission to find the best solutions about the need to transmit greater
amounts of power through long distances with fewer aesthetic and electrical impacts on the environment. The pressures
have led to re-examination of basics of the three-phase system. In some applications, for transmitting power over very
long distances it may be more economical to convert the EHV ac to EHV dc, transmit the power over two lines, and
invert it back to ac at the other end. But the main disadvantage of the dc link is the production of harmonics which
requires filtering, and a large amount of reactive power compensation required at both ends of the line. For other
applications, it has seemed advantageous to optimize some form of ac. These have renewed interest in techniques to
increase the power carrying capacity of existing right-of-ways (ROW) by using the higher order transmission system.
Six-phase transmission appears to be the best solution to the need to increase the capability of an existing transmission
line and at the same time, responds to the concerns relating to economical and environmental effects. A good deal of
research effort applied since early 1970's has proved the economic viability of three to six-phase conversion of an
existing three-phase double-circuit line.

Conversion of an existing three-phase double-circuit overhead transmission line to six-phase single-circuit operation is
needed phase conversion transformers to obtain the 60° phase shift between adjacent phases. Three-phase double-circuit
transmission line can be easily converted to a six-phase single-circuit transmission line by using two pairs of identical
delta-wye three-phase transformers connected at each end of the line as shown in Fig. 1. One of each pair of transformer
has reverse polarity to obtain the required 60° phase shift.

The aim of this paper is to analysis of fault and transient stability of six phase transmission line.To demonstrate the
effects of six-phase conversion, test system has been simulated using PSCAD/EMTDC.

@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 350

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

II. SIX-PHASE FAULTS

The various types of faults likely to occur on a six-phase system may be as large as eleven in number, compared
with only five in the case of three-phase systems. Six-phase faults are the most severe and least common, whereas single-
line-to-ground faults are least severe but most common. In addition, faults involving two and three phases with several
distinct possibilities may be more frequent in six-phase systems than in three-phase systems. In an earlier work, four
types of faults (viz. six-phase, single-line-to-ground, three-phase- to-ground and five-phase-to-ground) were analyzed
using the symmetrical component transformation lacking the power invariant feature. The relations were developed only
for the calculation of sequence currents, without any numerical illustration. In the present investigation , all possible
cases of faults are considered using power invariant symmetrical component transformations derived from group
theoretic considerations, expressions for fault currents and voltages (both in sequence components and phase variables),
and the connection of the sequence network in each case is also presented.

The various types of faults that can occur in a six-phase system, which is considered here, are:
(1) single-phase-to-ground fault (LG),
(2) two-phase-to-ground fault (LLG),
(3) two-phase fault (LL),
(4) three-phase-to-ground fault (LLLG),
(5) three-phase fault (LLL),
(6) four-phase-to-ground fault (LLLLG),
(7) four-phase fault (LLLL),
(8) five-phase-to-ground fault (LLLLLG),
(9) five-phase fault (LLLLL),
(10) six-phase-to-ground fault (LLLLLLG),
(11) six-phase fault (LLLLLL).

In the development to follow, the six-phase system is assumed to be balanced and unloaded, i.e. open-circuited
during the pre-fault stage, and all faults are assumed to be bolted just to simplify matters for clarity of presentation.

III. TRANSIENT STABILITY

Transient stability is the ability of a power system to remain in synchronism when subjected to large transient
disturbances. These disturbances may include faults on transmission elements, loss of load, loss of generation, or loss of
system components such as transformers or transmission lines. The resulting system response involves large excursions
of generator rotor angles and is influenced by the nonlinear power-angle relationship. Stability depends on both the initial
operating state of the system and the severity of the disturbance. Usually, the system altered so that the post disturbance
steady-state operation is differs from that prior to the disturbance. Most power system engineers are familiar with plots of
generator rotor angle (δ) versus time (t). Fig. 2 illustrates the behaviour of a synchronous machine for stable and unstable
situations. It shows the rotor angle responses for a stable case and for two unstable cases. In the stable case (Case 1), the
rotor angle increases to a maximum, then decreases and oscillates with decreasing amplitude until reaches a steady-state.
In Case 2, the rotor angle continues to increase steadily until synchronism is lost. This form of instability is referred to as
first-swing instability and is caused by insufficient synchronizing torque. In Case 3, the system is stable in the first-swing
but becomes unstable as a results of growing oscillations as the end state is approached. This form of instability generally
occurs when the post-fault steady-state condition itself is "small-signal" unstable, and not necessarily as a result of the
transient disturbance.

@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 351

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

In large power systems, transient stability may not always occur as first-swing instability. It could be the result of the
superposition of several modes of oscillation causing large excursions of rotor angle beyond the first swing. As far as
transient stability is concerned, the most severe switching action is the balanced six-line fault. Two concepts are essential
in understanding transient stability known as the swing equation and the power-angle relationship. The swing equation
describes the swings of the rotor angle S during disturbances and is given by:

For a system to be transiently stable during a disturbance, it is necessary for the rotor angle (as its behaviour is described
by the swing equation) to oscillate around an equilibrium point. If the rotor angle increases indefinitely, the machine is
said to be transiently unstable as the machine continues to accelerate and does not reach a new state of equilibrium. In
multi-machine systems, such a machine will "pull out of step" and lose synchronism with the rest of the machines. The
second concept of transient stability is power-angle relationship which is the relationship between the electrical power of
the generator Pe, and the rotor angle of the machine S and is given by:

Power flow is a maximum when δ = 90°. If the angle exceeds 90°, the power decreases with increasing angle. System
changes which reduce S for the same power enhance the system stability, because there is additional margin for the
system to swing without exceeding the 90°. Increasing phase to ground voltage by six-phase conversion increases the
voltage, thus generally enhancing system stability in the same manner as system stability is enhanced by any conversion
that results in a higher line operating voltage.

IV. STUDY SYSTEMS

SIX PHASE TRANSMISSION LINE SIMULATION MODEL IN PSCAD

Conversion of existing double-circuit three-phase overhead transmission line to a six-phase operation needed phase-
conversion transformers to obtain the 60° phase shift between adjacent phases. A double-circuit three-phase transmission
line can easily converted to a six-phase transmission line by using two pairs of identical delta-star, three-phase
transformers connected at each end of the line as shown in Fig.4.1, Goudey to Oakdale has been reconfigured from an
115kV double circuit three-phase line to a 93kV six-phase line. The line will be operated with a nominal phase-to-ground
voltage of 93 kV. The phase-to-phase voltage will be 93 kV between adjacent phases (60 degrees apart), 161 kV between
phases (120 degrees apart), and 186 kV between opposite phases (180 degrees apart). For reconfigured 115kV three
phase-double circuits to 93kV six phase lines, here we use two, three phase delta to star with ground 115/161kV
transformers at Goudey side and two, three phase star to delta 161/115kV identical transformers at Oakdale side to obtain
six phase 93kV transmission line, as shown in figure 4.1

@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 352

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

Figure-4.1 Conversion of double-circuit three-phase overhead transmission line to a six-phase line

V. ANALYSIS OF SIMULATION RESULTS

5.1. Fault Analysis

5.1.1 Transients due to Faults on Transmission Elements at Phase A
Single phase to ground fault occurs on phase ‘a’ of six phase transmission line, at time 6.9 second phase voltage ‘a’ is
zero till the fault will be clear, and after 0.05 second fault will clear and voltage at phase ‘a’ is increasing due to transient
and after some time it attains normal position is shown in figure 5.1.1(a). The load angle graph is shown in figure 5.1.1
(b), the rotor swing high at the time of fault and oscillation is damp out and system comes in normal position. The real
power P and reactive power Q are also swing due to swing in rotor and damped out with time is shown in figure 5.1.1(c)
and (d).
Six Phase Voltage Graph Synchronous machine : Graphs
Va Vb Vc Vd Ve Vf
200 Load angle
0.260
150
0.240
100
0.220
An g le (ra d ia n )

50
0.200
Voltage (KV)

0
0.180
-50
0.160
-100
0.140
-150
0.120
-200 Time s 5.990 6.000 6.010 6.020 6.030 6.040 6.050 6.060 6.070 ...
Time s ...
5.990 6.000 6.010 6.020 6.030 6.040 6.050 6.060 6.070 ...
...
... ...

Figure 5.1.1 (a) Voltage Graph Figure 5.1.1 (b) Load Angle Graph

Synchronous Machine : Graphs

Synchronous Machine : Graphs
REAL POWER REACTIVE POWER
60 70

50 60

50
R eactive Pow er (MVAR )

40
R e a l Po w e r (MW )

40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0

-10 -10
Time s 5.990 6.000 6.010 6.020 6.030 6.040 6.050 6.060 6.070 ... Time s ...
5.990 6.000 6.010 6.020 6.030 6.040 6.050 6.060 6.070
... ...
... ...

Figure 5.1.1 (c) Real Power Graph Figure 5.1.1 (d) Reactive Power Graph

5.2 Transient Stability Analysis

Transients when Six Phase Transmission Line charging at time 1.0 Second
5.2.1 Implemetation : (115 KV /161 KV)
When double three phase circuit converted in to six phase by changing the transformer connection as shown in figure 4.1
and charged with 115KV at time 1.0 second , then the transient is high at this time due to charging of line capacitors and
inrush current of transformers. The voltage transient graph is shown in figure 5.2.1(a) at 1.0 second and transient is
subsided in 0.09 second.
@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 353
 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

Six Phase Voltage Graph

Va Vb Vc Vd Ve Vf
300

200

100

Voltage (KV)
0

-100

-200

-300
Time s 0.990 1.000 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.040 1.050 1.060 1.070 1.080 1.090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 ...
...
...

Figure 5.2.1(a) Voltage Graph for at the Time of Line charging at 1.0 Second

5.2.2 Implemetation: (115KV/161KV)

The load angle graph is shown in figure 5.2.2 (a), the rotor swing high at the time of charging and oscillation is damp out
and system comes in normal position. The real power P and reactive power Q are also swing due to swing in rotor and
damped out with time is shown in figure 5.2.2 (b) and (c),.

Synchronous machine : Graphs Synchronous Machine : Graphs

Load angle REAL POWER
0.40 15.0
0.30
10.0
0.20
R e a l Po w e r (M W )

5.0
0.10
An g le (ra d ia n )

0.00 0.0

-0.10
-5.0
-0.20
-10.0
-0.30

-0.40 -15.0
Time s 0.990 1.000 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.040 1.050 1.060 1.070 1.080 1.090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 ... Time s 0.990 1.000 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.040 1.050 1.060 1.070 1.080 1.090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 ...
... ...
... ...

Figure 5.2.1 (a) Load Angle Graph Figure 5.2.1 (b) Real Power Graph
Synchronous Machine : Graphs
REACTIVE POWER
10.0
7.5
5.0
Reactive Power (MVAR)

2.5
0.0
-2.5
-5.0
-7.5
-10.0
-12.5
-15.0
Time s 0.990 1.000 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.040 1.050 1.060 1.070 1.080 1.090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 ...
...
...

Figure 5.2.1 (c) Reactive Power Graph

5.2.3 Implemetation: Data From Captive Power Plant Korba (13.8KV/220KV)

When double three phase circuit converted in to six phase by changing the transformer connection as shown in figure 4.1
and charged with 13.8KV at time 1.0 second, then the transient is high at this time due to charging of line capacitors and
inrush current of transformers.
The voltage transient graph is shown in figure 5.2.3(a) at 1.0 second and transient is subsided in 0.09 second
Six Phase Voltage Graph
Va Vb Vc Vd Ve Vf
400

300

200

100
Voltage (KV)

-100

-200

-300

-400
Time s 0.990 1.000 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.040 1.050 1.060 1.070 1.080 1.090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 ...
...
...

Figure 5.2.3 (a) Voltage Graph for at the Time of Line charging at 1.0 Second
@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 354
 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

5.2.4 Implemetation: Data From Captive Power Plant Korba (13.8KV/220KV)

The load angle graph is shown in figure 5.2.4 (a), the rotor swing high at the time of charging and oscillation is damp out
and system comes in normal position. The real power P and reactive power Q are also swing due to swing in rotor and
damped out with time is shown in figure 5.2.4 (b) and (c).
synchronous machine
Load angle
0.80
Synchronous Machine : Graphs
0.60 REAL POWER
80
0.40 60
Load angle (radian)

0.20 40

Real power (MW )

0.00 20

0
-0.20
-20
-0.40
-40
-0.60
-60
-0.80
-80
Time s 0.990 1.010 1.030 1.050 1.070 1.090 1.110 1.130 1.150 ... Time s ...
0.990 1.010 1.030 1.050 1.070 1.090 1.110 1.130 1.150
... ...
... ...

Figure 5.2.4 (a) Load Angle Graph Figure 5.2.4 (b) Real Power Graph

Synchronous Machine : Graphs

REACTIVE POWER
40

20
Reactive power (MVAR)

-20

-40

-60

-80

-100

-120
Time s 0.990 1.010 1.030 1.050 1.070 1.090 1.110 1.130 1.150 ...
...
...

Figure 5.2.4 (c) Reactive Power Graph

VI. CONCLUSION

This paper investigates the faults analysis and transient stability of three to six-phase conversion of selected transmission
line of test system. In this paper a detailed modelling of six phase transmission line in PSCAD for transient stability
analysis is presented and also impacts of faults on the system are analyzed. The analysis is done by monitoring system
stability of the test system. All possible types of fault on the middle of transmission lines have been applied to test
systems and critical clearing times is estimated. This analysis has been conducted by using PSCAD/EMTDC.

REFERENCES

[1] A. S. Bin Saroor and S. N. Tiwari,"Modelling and analysis of multiphase (twelve-phase) line transients”, Electr.
Power Syst. Res., 20 (1991) 49- 62.
[2] E.Z. Zhou, MEEE, “object-oriented Programming, C++ and Power System Simulation”, IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, February 1996
[3] A.F. Neyer, F.F. Wu and K. Imhof, "Objected-Oriented Programming For Flexible Software: Example of a
Load Flow", IEEE Tran. on Power Systems, Vol.5, No.3, Aug. 1990, pp 689-696.
[4] A.M. Sasson, "Open systems procurement: a migration strategy", IEEE/PES 1992 Winter Meeting (92WM158-
6), New York, New York, Jan. 1992
[5] J.L. Scheidt, M.E. Robertson, "The Problem of Upgrading Energy Management Systems", IEEE Transaction on
Power Systems, Vo1.3, No.1, Feb. 1988 pp 118-126
[6] M. W. Mustafa and M. R. Ahmad, "Transient Stability Analysis of Power System with Six-Phase Converted
Transmission Line" First International Power and Energy Conference PECon 2006 November 28-29, 2006,
Putrajaya, Malaysia
[7] Navin B. Bhatt , Subrahmanyam S. Venkat , William C. Guyker, William H. Booth , Six- Phase (Multi-Phase)
Power Transmission systems: Fault Analysis , IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus and Systems,Vol. PAS-
96, no. 3, May/ June 1977
[8] A. S. Bin Saroor and S. N. Tiwari, An investigation into analysis of series faults in multiphase transmission
systems, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 19 (1990) 85 93.
[9] S. N. Tiwari and L. P. Singh, Six-phase (multiphase) power systems: some aspects of modelling and fault
analysis, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 6 (1983) 193- 202.
[10] Nanda, S P, Tiwari, S N and Singh, L P 'Fault analysis of six-phase system' Electr. Power Syst. Res. J. Vol 4
No 3 (July 1981) pp 201-211
@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 355
 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 3, Issue 6, June -2016, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

[11] S. N. TIWARI and L. P. SINGH, Six-Phase (Multiphase) Power Systems: Transient Stability Analysis, Electric
Power Systems Research, 9 (1985) 273 - 281
[12] S. N. Tiwari and L. P. Singh, Six-phase (multiphase) power transmission systems: a generalized investigation
of the load flow problem, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 5 (1982) 285 - 297.
[13] S. N. Tiwari and L. P. Singh, Mathematical modeling and analysis of multi-phase systems, IEEE Trans., PAS-
101 (1982) 1784 - 1793
[14] M.W. Mustafa, M.R. Ahmed and H. Shareef, Fault analysis on double three-phase to six-phase converted
transmission line, IEEE Power Engg. Conference, IPBC, 2005, pp. 1-5
[15] Siti Amely Binti Jumaat, Prof Madya Dr. Mohd. Wazir Bin Mustafa "Analysis Of Six Phase System For
Transmission Line" The 2nd International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO2008),
Shah Alam, Selangor, MALAYSIA. 4-5 June 2008.
[16] S. N. Tiwari and G. K. Singh, A. S. Bin Saroor , Multiphase power transmission research a survey Electric
Power Systems Research, 24 (1992) 207-215
[17] S. N. Tiwari and L. P. Singh, Steady state modelling of six-phase (multi-phase) transmission systems, Electr.
Power Energy Syst., 4 (1983) 120 128.
[18] Olimpo Anaya-Lara and E. Acha, “Modeling and Analysis of Custom Power Systems by PSCAD/EMTDC”,
IEEE transactions on Power Delivery, Volume 17, No1, Jan 2002
[19] A. M. Gole, “Simulation tools for system transients: an introduction”, Proceedings of the Power Engineering
Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE, Volume 2, 16-20 July 2000, Pages: 761 - 762 vol. 2
[20] Y. Wang and N.C. Pahalawaththa, “Power system load modeling”, Proceedings of the 1998 international
conference on Power System Technology, Volume 1, 18-21 Aug, Pages: 725 – 729.
[21] EMTDC/PSCAD Technical documentation, Manitoba HVDC research centre, Canada (trial version of
software package available at http: s//pscad.com/products/PSCAD/trial download/index
[22] J. R. Stewart and D. D. Wilson, "High Phase OrderTransmission--A Feasibility Analysis Part II-Overvoltages
and Insulation Requirements," IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-97, No. 6,
Nov/Dec 1978, p2308

@IJAERD-2016, All rights Reserved 356

View publication stats