0% found this document useful (0 votes)
246 views

Water Footprint in The Clothing & Textile Industry

The document discusses the large water footprint of the clothing and textile industry. It notes that fast fashion has made this industry one of the major contributors to water pollution globally. The full production process of clothing from growing cotton to consumer laundering requires billions of liters of water. This overuse of water resources threatens future supply and impacts communities where production occurs. The document also outlines impacts like water pollution from dyes and microplastics, and proposes solutions like more sustainable production methods and importing virtual water through trade to reduce domestic water usage.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
246 views

Water Footprint in The Clothing & Textile Industry

The document discusses the large water footprint of the clothing and textile industry. It notes that fast fashion has made this industry one of the major contributors to water pollution globally. The full production process of clothing from growing cotton to consumer laundering requires billions of liters of water. This overuse of water resources threatens future supply and impacts communities where production occurs. The document also outlines impacts like water pollution from dyes and microplastics, and proposes solutions like more sustainable production methods and importing virtual water through trade to reduce domestic water usage.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

ADRIANO, Jensen Marie FRANCISCO, James Harvey

AGAREM, Arabella Sybille LEONARDO, Maria Margarita


ALBANO, Juan Antonio NEBRES, Patricia
DEMEGILLO, Louise Marie PARLADE, Gerd Martin Anthony
2-AR6 Building Utilities 1

Water Footprint in the Clothing & Textile Industry

1. CURRENT SITUATION
The fashion and textile world is one of the most lucrative business ventures in
the economy. Aside from giving the consumers protection from the different
elements, it allows them to explore styles that affect trends throughout the years.
However, fast fashion culture– involving the speed of production and
consumption of fashion–makes it one of the major contributors to water pollution;
and one that has a huge water footprint.
The measure of a water footprint involves both direct and indirect
freshwater consumption. The processing and production of clothing is estimated
to spend around billions of liters of water in every step of production from dyeing
to applying specialty and finishing chemicals to using a water bath to remove
aforementioned chemicals. Every 20,000 pounds of manufactured fabric
consumes about 36,000 liters of water. The water usage of textile mills still varies
depending on what type of fabric is produced, processed, and the types and
modernity of equipment used (Shaikh, 2009). Furthermore, the whole production
cycle from the supply chains to the end-users also contributes greatly to the
pollution. In 2015, the fashion industry alone consumed 79 billion cubic meters of
water which can fill approximately 32 million Olympic sized pools, which
threatens Earth’s water supply in 2030. Part of the reason these seemingly
simple garments have such enormous water footprints is that they’re made from
cotton, and it takes 20,000 liters of water to grow just one kilogram of cotton.
(Benson, 2018). According to “The Water Footprint of the Blue Jean'', 2020,
global textile production requires an estimated 44 trillion liters of water yearly for
irrigation, and inside a 3% chunk of that, 95% is for growing cotton. Aside from
textile production, doing laundry by using washing machines requires an
additional 20 billion cubic meters of water per year (Conscious Club, 2019).

The excessive use of water may be nothing to its great consumers, but the
impact is greatly felt by the producing community (Chan, E., Khatib, H., &
Sabhnani, D., 2020). In fact, experts predict that the world is not far from
experiencing water scarcity, especially in developing countries where textile
production is established, because of cheap labor and lenient environmental
laws. As water scarcity becomes more extreme, it threatens the fashion
industries, cotton-growing nations, and livelihoods that mainly rely on fishing and
farming (Chavan, 2018).

The severity of the situation can be truly felt when looking into the
production costs of one outfit, in this case, a white shirt and a pair of denim
jeans. In “The Impact of a Cotton T-Shirt | Stories | WWF,” 2013, it states that a
single cotton tee shirt needs 2,700 liters of water to produce. This is enough for a
person to drink water for 900 days. After purchase, the garment goes through
washing and drying, which costs 40 gallons of water and five times as much
energy to dry it. (“It Takes 2,700 Liters of Water to Make a T-Shirt,” 2013). The
top accounts for just half of the outfit, the jeans to go with it has an even bigger
water footprint. According to the United Nations (2020), it takes 10,000 to make a
single pair of denim jeans. This includes growing the cotton, washing, then
dyeing it blue. In total, a basic white shirt and jeans combination has a massive
12,700-liter water footprint, and a single person could own multiple combinations
of this outfit in their lifetime, or even in a year. Though consumers are not to be
blamed, rather the industries that produce. These companies have the
responsibility to find ways to produce sustainably, otherwise there will no longer
be resources to produce with.

2. IMPACTS
With these processes, the scathing effects it does on the environment are
getting more evident through the years. Millions of gallons of dye water waste are
continuously discharged into bodies of water by the production of fabrics in textile
mills everyday. Resnick (2019) asserts that the products of these processes such
as polyester, nylon, acrylic, and other synthetic fibers are all forms of plastics
which make up to 60 percent of the textile being used worldwide. The clothes
washed may release microplastics which can be harmful to other species in the
marine ecosystem, and could be ingested by other marine species till it reaches
the food chain to humans. Additionally, Aivazidou and Tsolakis (2018) said that
from an end-to-end supply chain perspective, consumers are also responsible for
the impact they contributed in terms of water consumption and pollution as they
wash their clothes. The average Western world family throws away an average of
30 kg of clothing each year. Only 15% is recycled or donated​, ​and the rest goes
directly to the landfill or is incinerated. 72% of our clothing is made from synthetic
fibers, which is basically plastic -- one of the materials that take too long to
decompose. (SustainYourStyle, 2014).

Garment manufacturing is attributed with 20% of the world’s industrial water


pollution. (“The Water Footprint of the Blue Jean,” 2020). According to Kumar
and Pavithra (2019), The textile industries in India and China are noted for mixing
untreated wastewater (consisting of fat, oil, dyes, and other chemicals) on their
local water supply usage which they use in their method of production. This
pollutes our ecosystem as it goes directly into the local streams and rivers.
Cotton is the most liked fiber in the textile industry. However, it is the
biggest culprit of water consumption and water pollution. Millions upon millions of
tons of dye wastewater are drained into rivers. It’s estimated that a single mill can
use 200 tons of freshwater per ton of dyed fabric. (Conscious Club, 2019).
According to The Global Fashion Agenda (GFA) and the Boston Consulting
Group (BCG), some of the main cotton-producing countries like China and India
already have water bodies that are suffering medium to high water stress. In
India and Bangladesh, dye wastewater is discharged, often untreated, into
nearby rivers and eventually spreading into the sea. Reports show a dramatic
rise in diseases in these regions due to the use of dyes with a high hazard. The
Chinese state Environmental Protection Administration declared that nearly
one-third of the country’s rivers are classified as “too polluted for any direct
human contact” (Conscious Club, 2019). Cotton accounts for 24% of the world’s
insecticide use and 11% of pesticides despite only occupying 2.4% of the world’s
cropland. Toxic chemicals washing into waterways and entering the ecosystems
has become a major source of pollution, especially in developing countries.
Unsustainable cotton farming has resulted in the drying of the Aral Sea in central
Asia–the then 4th largest inland water body in the world. It was an important
source of life for the surrounding communities and home to millions of fish. It now
covers a mere 10% of its original area. The local Uzbek communities have
suffered the loss of livelihoods and food sources while gaining new health
impacts. The dust from the lake is carcinogenic covering most of the villages
(Chavan, 2018)

Each year, textile companies discharge millions of liters of chemically


infected water into waterways. It is estimated that a single mill can use 200 liters
of fresh water per kilogram fabric during chemical processing operations. So,
there is not only high water consumption, but the chemicals pollute the water
affecting the community in terms of health impact, resource depletion, subsidy
and opportunity cost of water, and environmental impacts. (Global Fashion
Agenda, 2017).

3. SOLUTIONS
Despite the given circumstances and effects of the industry, there ways to
make the industry more sustainable, and environmentally responsible in terms of
water footprint. By relying primarily on goods that can be produced within its
borders, a country can develop self-sufficiency. A country may choose to reduce
the burden on the natural resources within its borders by importing
water-intensive products from other countries. For water-scarce countries it can
sometimes be attractive to import virtual water (through the import of
water-intensive products), thus relieving the pressure on the domestic water
resources. Chavan (2018) iterates that countries can both import and export
virtual water through their international trade relations.

Fortunately, some companies now think of different ways to create fashion


with a sense of sustainability. In the industry of creating blue jeans, Everlane, an
American clothing retailer, manufactures its jeans by reusing 98% of the water.
Through the laser dyeing method done by Levi Strauss Company, they are able
to reduce up to 71% of water consumption. Wrangler did the same thing by their
new product of Dry Indigo jeans that eliminates 99% water consumption for
dyeing. (Fluence News Team, 2020).

A collaboration between the ​Vietnam Textile and Apparel Association (VITAS)


and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) are pushing to make Vietnam’s bourgeoning
textile and apparel industry more sustainable by this year, 2020. The project will
include improved water quality management of the river basin to foster social,
economic and conservation benefits. The VITAS/WWF initiative comes on the
heels of a similar HSBC Bank-funded program in China, Bangladesh, India, and
Vietnam. (Fluence News Team, 2019).

The Water Saving Processes for Textile Production (WASATEX) in Croatia is


another example of a water treatment project, an innovative combination of
well-tested technology that allows the reuse of up to 90% of water treated in any
part of the industrial process. This allows significant savings of the water itself in
costs associated with its discharge. Further reduction of environmental impact is
due to lower consumption of natural resources to heat the incoming water
(because the re-used water has a temperature of 30°C against 15°C of well
water), with observable fewer gaseous emissions and a cost-saving on fuel.
(Eco-innovation, 2014).

As consumers, we can help reduce the consumption of water concerning our


choice of clothing by choosing some brands made in countries where they have
stricter regulations for factories as well as choosing organic and natural fibers
that do not require chemicals to be produced. (SustainYourStyle, 2014).
Being a meticulous consumer is the best way we can do to help our
consumption to lessen our water footprint.

REFERENCES
Adegeest, D. (2020, September 06). Wastewater: Fashion's grotesk sustainability
problem. Retrieved September 06, 2020, from
https://fashionunited.uk/news/fashion/wastewater-fashion-s-grotesk-sustainability
-problem/2020050548770
Aivazidou, E., & Tsolakis, N. (2018). Water footprint management in the fashion supply
chain: A review on emerging trends and research challenges. Water in Textiles
and Fashion: Consumption, Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment, 77-94.
doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102633-5.00005-1
Benson, S. (2018, March 22). It Takes 2,720 Liters Of Water To Make ONE T-Shirt - As
Much As You'd Drink In 3 Years. Retrieved from
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/water-consumption-fashion-industry
Chan, E., Khatib, H., & Sabhnani, D. (2020, March 22). The fashion industry is using up
too much water - here's how you can reduce your H2O footprint. Retrieved from
https://www.vogue.in/fashion/content/the-fashion-industry-is-using-up-too-much-
water-heres-how-you-can-reduce-your-h2o-footprint
Chavan, R. B. (2018). Thirsty Textile and Fashion Industry PART I: Water Distribution
on Earth and Virtual Water, Water Footprint Concepts. ​Latest Trends in Textile
and Fashion Designing,​ ​2​(5). doi:10.32474/lttfd.2018.02.000150
Common Objective. (2018, February 01). The Issues: Water. Retrieved from
https://www.commonobjective.co/article/the-issues-water
Conscious Club. (2019, May 15). Water & Clothing. Retrieved from
https://www.theconsciouschallenge.org/ecologicalfootprintbibleoverview/water-cl
othing
Eco-innovation. (2014, July 01). Water Saving Processes for Textile Production
(WASATEX). Retrieved from
https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eco-innovation/projects/en/projects/wasatex#re
sults
Fluence News Team. (2019, February 20). Textile Industry Water Use and Treatment.
Retrieved September 06, 2020, from
https://www.fluencecorp.com/textile-industry-water-use/
Fluence News Team (2020, August 03). The Water Footprint of the Blue Jean.
Retrieved from https://www.fluencecorp.com/blue-jeans-water-footprint/
Franke, N., & Mathews, R. (2013, June 8). C&A's Water Footprint Strategy: Cotton
Clothing Supply Chain. Retrieved from
https://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/CA_Strategy_Final_Report_Formatte
d_06.08.2013.pdf
It Takes 2,700 Liters of Water to Make a T-Shirt. (2013, February 06). Retrieved
September 06, 2020, from
https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2013/it-takes-2700-liters-water-make-t-shirt/54
321
Kiron, M. (2014, April). Water Consumption in the Textile Industry. Retrieved from
https://textilelearner.blogspot.com/2014/04/water-consumption-in-textile-industry.
html
Muthu, S. S. (2019). ​Water in textiles and fashion: Consumption, footprint, and life cycle
assessment​. Duxford, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing. 214.
https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03774-6
Kumar, S., & Pavithra, G. (2019). Water and Textiles. Water in Textiles and Fashion:
Consumption, Footprint, and Life Cycle Assessment, 21-40.
doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102633-5.00002-6
Resnick, B. (2018, September 19). More than ever, our clothes are made of plastic. Just
washing them can pollute the oceans. Retrieved from
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/9/19/17800654/clothes-plastic-pollution-pol
yester-washing-machine
Shaikh, M. A. (2009). Water conservation in textile industry. Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://sswm.info/sites/
default/files/reference_attachments/SHAKIH%25202009%2520Water%2520cons
ervation%2520in%2520the%2520textile%2520industry.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjGhq3
ujbPrAhUTZt4KHefMADUQFjALegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw2XWp_1_RatqS--YmE
UOc-H&cshid=1598247007461
Smith, L. (2019, August 27). How the Textile Industry Reduces its Water Footprint.
Retrieved from
https://www.ispo.com/en/trends/id_79705746/how-textile-industry-reduces-its-wat
er-footprint.html
SustianYourStyle. (2014). Environmental Impacts of the Fashion Industry. Retrieved
September 06, 2020, from
https://www.sustainyourstyle.org/old-environmental-impacts
Thapa, P. (2014, April). Reducing water footprint in textile industry. Retrieved from
https://indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=5991
The Impact of a Cotton T-Shirt. (2013, January 16). Retrieved September 06, 2020,
from https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/the-impact-of-a-cotton-t-shirt
Water Footprint Network. (n.d.). What is a water footprint? Retrieved September 06,
2020, from https://waterfootprint.org/en/water-footprint/what-is-water-footprint/

You might also like