TunnelingLecture 6 PDF
TunnelingLecture 6 PDF
CENG 7025
Concept
Geotechnical Investigations
Detailed design
Design procedures
Geometric Considerations
Stress around openings
Design methods
Construction methods and procedures
Post Construction Considerations
Case Histories
TUNNELING
DETAILED DESIGN – LINING
Design methods
Empirical methods
Analytical (closed form) Approach
Numerical Approach
Observational Method
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods
• based on assessments of precedent practice
• The most frequently used empirical design methods are the
RMR– Rock Mass Rating (Bieniawski, 1994) and the Q-
systems (Barton et al., 1974)
employ a combination of parameters such as the strength
of the rock, its quality by using RQD values (Barton, 1999),
joints, and number of sets, frequency, spacing and
condition, and groundwater conditions to produce a rock
mass classification
• Hoek et al. (1998) formulate and quantify an empirical
failure criterion for rock masses.
• GSI–Geological Strength Index System introduced to
compensate for inconsistencies in weak rocks and shallow
tunnels
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods
• Revise the different rock mass classification schemes
• An inter-relation was proposed between the RMR and the Q
(Bieniawski, 1976) based on 111 case histories.
The correlation is:-
RMR =9 ln Q + 44
• According to Barton
RMR = 15 log Q+50
• Conversion can also be made from RMR to Q
• There are developed methods with the Q method to
determine the support condition
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods – RMR application
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods – RMR application
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods – RMR application
TUNNELING TECHNIQUES
DETAILED DESIGN – COMPUTATION METHODS
Empirical methods – RMR application