Contents

1 Shareholders and Company Meetings.......................................................................................................................2

2 Directors, Board Committees and the Company Secretary.......................................................................................6
3 Duties of Directors...................................................................................................................................................13
4 Capacity and Representation of a Company............................................................................................................17
5 Corporate Finance: Shares and Debentures............................................................................................................19
6 Capital Maintenance...............................................................................................................................................23
7 Groups of Companies..............................................................................................................................................26
8 Takeovers, Offers and Fundamental Transactions...................................................................................................27
9 Business Rescue Proceedings..................................................................................................................................32
10 Abbreviations......................................................................................................................................................39
1 Shareholders and Company Meetings
1.1 Introduction
Shareholder:
 Term used only in respect of a profit company.
 Person who is entitled to exercise any voting rights in relation to a company, irrespective of the form, title or
nature of the securities to which those voting rights are attached.
 Retain control over the directors by their power to appoint and remove directors
 Approve important decisions of the directors
Member:
 Term used for non-profit companies who do not have shareholders
Directors:
 Have authority to exercise all powers and perform any of functions of the company, except to extent that Act or
company’s Memorandum of Incorporation provides otherwise
 Have a duty to manage the company
1.2 Notice of Meetings
Notice must:
 be in writing
 include date, time and place for the meeting
 explain general purpose of the meeting;
 contain a statement that a shareholder is entitled to appoint a proxy to attend, participate in and vote at the
meeting in the place of a shareholder
 should indicate the participants will be required to provide proof of identity at the meeting
 be accompanied by a copy of any proposed resolution which will be considered at the meeting
 indicate percentage of voting rights required for the resolution to be adopted
 Notice before date of meeting:
 Public company & non-profit company with voting members: 15 business days
 Any other company: 10 business days
 MOI may prescribe longer minimum notice
 Notice convening AGM:
 must contain summary of the financial statements
 must explain procedure shareholder can follow to obtain complete financial statements
Defective notice:
 Meeting may proceed if:
 Persons who are entitled to vote i.r.o. each item on agenda:
 are present
 acknowledge actual receipt of notice
 agree to waive notice of meeting / ratify defective notice
 Where defect relates to one/more matters on the agenda:
 matter may be taken off agenda; notice remains valid w.r.t. remaining matters
 where defective notice ratified: meeting may consider matter
1.3 Representation by Proxy
Getz v Spaarwater: Validity or otherwise of proxy must depends on facts of each case. Material departure from
prescribed form may invalidate proxy. Here: only date of execution on form left blank and this non-compliance was
judged to not be of a material nature.
Davey and others v Inyaminga Petroleum: cf. Getz. Prescribed form required proxy giver to set out number of shares
i.r.o. which he was authorizing proxy to vote. Non-compliance was judged to be of a material nature and proxy was thus
incomplete and invalid.
Ingre v Maxwell: Must be at least 2 persons present to constitute a meeting; not valid where 1 person holds all
proxies of all persons who were entitled to attend meeting.
 The appointment of a proxy:
 in writing and signed by shareholder;
 valid for one year;
 may be for a specific period of time;
 may be for two or more persons concurrently exercising voting rights for different shares;
 proxy may delegate authority to act on behalf of the shareholder to another person;
 copy of the proxy appointment form must be delivered to the company before the shareholders’ meeting;
 shareholder is not compelled to make an irrevocable proxy appointment;
 shareholder may alter proxy by cancelling it in writing, appointing another proxy and deliver a copy of the
revocation to the proxy and the company.
 appointment remains valid until end of meeting for which it was intended to be used.
Proxy is entitled to vote as he/she sees fit, unless shareholder indicated on proxy form how proxy should vote.
1.4 Demand to convene a shareholders’ meeting
Board of company/any other person specified in MOI may call a shareholders’ meeting at any time.
Meeting must be convened:
 at any time required by the CA or MOI, i.e. to elect a director
 if one/more written and signed demands for such a meeting are delivered to the company.
Relevant points when demand is made:
 demand must specify purpose of meeting
 demand must be signed by holders of at least 10% of voting rights
 MOI may specify a lower percentage than 10%
 Company/shareholder may apply for order setting aside demand for meeting on following grounds:
 Vexatious
 Frivolous
 Matter has already been considered and decided upon by shareholders
 Demand may be withdrawn before start of meeting.
1.5 Shareholders acting other than at a meeting
Gohlke and Schneider v Westies Minerale: members may validly appoint a director to the board without any formal
meeting being held because there was evidence of their unanimous consent.
In re Duomatic Ltd: unanimous approval of directors’ remuneration by the two directors holding all the voting shares
in a company could be regarded as a resolution of a general meeting approving the payment.
CA: Resolution may be submitted to shareholders and, if adopted in writing by the required majority, will have the
same effect as if it had been adopted at a meeting without actually holding a general meeting of shareholders (s 60).
Thus: unanimous assent of all shareholders is no longer necessary.
No business that must, in terms of the CA or the company’s MOI, be conducted at an annual general meeting may be
conducted by using this procedure.
1.6 Annual General Meeting
1st AGM must occur no more than 18 months after company’s date of incorporation.
Subsequent AGMs must occur no more than 15 months after the previous AGM.
Section 61(8): following matters must be transacted at the AGM:
 Election of directors to the extent required by the Act or the company’s MOI;
 Appointment of an auditor for the following financial year;
 Appointment of an audit committee;
 Presentation of the directors’ report;
 Presentation of audited financial statements for the immediately preceding financial year;
 Presentation of an audit committee report;
 Any matter raised by shareholders.
1.7 Convening a meeting in special circumstances
If a company cannot convene a meeting because it has no directors/the directors are incapacitated:
 Any person authorized by the MOI may convene a meeting
  If MOI does not authorize anybody: shareholders may request Companies Tribunal to issue an administrative
order for a meeting to be held.
If a company fails to convene a meeting for any reason other than the above
(a) at a time required in accordance with its Memorandum of Incorporation;
(b) when required by shareholders; or
(c) within the time required
a shareholder may apply to a court for an order requiring the company to convene a meeting on a date, and subject
to any terms, that the court considers appropriate in the circumstances.
1.8 Quorum
 Shareholders’ meeting may not begin until sufficient persons are present at the meeting to exercise, in aggregate,
at least 25% of all of the voting rights that are entitled to be exercised in respect of at least one matter to be
decided at the meeting; and
 A matter to be decided at the meeting may not begin to be considered unless sufficient persons are present at
the meeting to exercise, in aggregate, at least 25% of all of the voting rights that are entitled to be exercised on
that matter at the time the matter is called on the agenda.
 The company’s MOI may provide for a lower/higher percentage to constitute a quorum
 If a company has more than two shareholders, a meeting may not begin, or a matter begin to be debated, unless
at least 3 shareholders are present at the meeting, provided the members can exercise at least 25% of the voting
rights that are entitled to be exercised.
1.9 Conduct of meetings
Voting may be conducted by:
 A show of hands: any person can have only 1 vote, regardless of amount of shares held
 A poll
Where a person fails to exercise his/her vote: person is deemed to have voted against the resolution.
1.10 Majority rule
Sammel & Others v President Brand Gold Mining Co Ltd: Where a person becomes a shareholder in a company,
he/she agrees to be bound by the decision of the majority of the shareholders.
1.11 Exercise of voting rights
Pender v Lushington: shareholders, unlike directors, do not exercise their voting rights for the benefit of the company
and can act entirely in their own interests. A shareholder has a right to have his or her vote recorded, even if that vote
made no difference to the final results.
3 Scenarios:
1. A profit company (other than a state-owned enterprise) with only one shareholder:
i. shareholder may exercise all the voting rights.
ii. rules of setting a record date etc. do not apply.
2. A profit company (other than a state-owned enterprise) with only one director:
i. director may exercise any power/perform any function of the board at any time except when the MOI
provides otherwise.
3. A company (other than a state-owned enterprise) where every shareholder is also a director:
i. Shareholders may decide on any matter to be referred by the board at any time, without notice or
compliance with any internal formalities except when the Memorandum provides otherwise; subject to
certain specified conditions
1.12 Shareholder resolutions
CA provides 2 types of resolutions:
1. Ordinary resolution
i. Requires 50% or more of the voting rights exercised on the resolution
ii. MOI may require a higher percentage
2. Special resolution
i. Requires 75% or more of the voting rights exercised on the resolution
ii. MOI may require a lower percentage
 Must always be a difference of at least 10% between percentages required for an ordinary and a special resolution
1.13 Decisions that require a special resolution
Special resolution required for the following decisions:
1. Amendment of company’s MOI
2. Approving the voluntary winding up of the company
3. Approval of a sale of assets, a merger, an amalgamation or a scheme of arrangement.
MOI may require a special resolution to approve any other matter.
1.14 Postponement and Adjournment of meetings
Meeting may be postponed or adjourned for a week under the following circumstances:
1. if within an hour of the scheduled starting time the quorum is not formed.
i. Chairperson may extend 1 hour limit due to exceptional circumstances
ii. 1 hour limit can be altered by MOI
2. when a quorum is not present at the postponed or adjourned meeting: members present in person/by proxy will
be deemed to constitute a quorum.
3. If there is other business on the agenda, consideration of that matter may be postponed to a later time in the
meeting without motion or vote.
A meeting may not be adjourned for longer than whichever is the earlier of:
 120 business days after the record date
 60 business days after which the adjournment occurred
2 Directors, Board Committees and the Company Secretary
2.1 Meaning of the word “director” and the different types of directors.
Director: member of the board of a company and includes any person occupying the position of a director or
alternate director. A person becomes a director only:
 when that person has given his or her written consent to serve as director,
 after having been appointed/elected/holding office in accordance with the provisions of section 66 of the CA

Key functions of the BOD: (King Code)

 Give strategic direction to company
 Ensure that management implements board plans and strategies
 Be responsible for the performance and affairs of the company
 Retain full and effective control over the company
2.1.1 Types of directors according to the CA
Type Characteristics
Ex officio director  Person who holds a directorship due to that person holding another office/title/status
 Not appointed by shareholders
 All powers & functions of a normal director except to extent that MOI restricts such
powers/functions.
 Has all of the duties and is subject to the liabilities of any other director
MOI- appointed director  Does not have to be appointed by shareholders
 MOI can specify how/by whom such a director is appointed
Alternate director  Person elected/appointed in substitution for particular appointed/elected director
 May be appointed/elected depending on contents of MOI
 Profit company: at least 50% of alternate directors must be elected by shareholders
Elected director  Profit company: at least 50% of alternate directors must be elected by shareholders
Temporary director  MOI can provide for appointment of a temporary director
 Unless MOI provides otherwise, directors can appoint temporary director

2.2 Directors v. managers

Director Manager
Leadership  Provide leadership & direction at top of org.  Carry through strategy on behalf of directors
Decision making  Determine future of organization  Implementing decisions & policies made by board
 Protect org. reputation & assets
 Consider how decisions relate to stakeholders &
regulatory framework
Duties &  Long term prosperity of the company  Fewer legal responsibilities
responsibilities  Subject to fiduciary duties  Cannot act contrary to interests of employer
 Required by law to apply skill and care in
exercising their duty to the company.
 Breach of duties: personally liable
 Can be held responsible for acts of the company
Relationship  Accountable to shareholders for company’s  No interaction
with performance  Normally appointed & dismissed by directors
shareholders  Can be removed from office by them.
Ethics & values  Key role in determination of values & ethical  Must enact company ethos: take direction from
position of company board
Company  Responsible for company’s administration  Duties can be delegated to managers; ultimate
Administration responsibility lies with directors
Statutory  Many provisions in CA under which directors may  No held responsible under CA
provisions face penalties if they act/fail to act in a certain
way.
Disqualification  Can be disqualified in terms of CA/MOI  Control over manager’s employment lies with BOD
2.3 Number of directors and consent
 Private or personal liability company: at least 1 director
 Public and non-profit company: at least 3 directors
Person will only become a director of a company if he/she delivered a written consent accepting the position.
Section 66(11) provides: where company does not have prescribed minimum directors, does not negate or limit the
authority of the board, nor invalidate anything done by the board or the company.
Directors must be properly appointed (cf. S v Vanderberg and Others):no such thing as a de facto director exists.
2.4 Directors: the Act and a company’s Memorandum of Incorporation
Provisions in CA regarding directors variable by MOI:
CA MOI
Number  Private/personal liability company: at least 1  Can specify higher number
 Public and non-profit company: at least 3  Cannot specify lower number
 Company does not have prescribed minimum: any  Cannot invalidate acts where company does not
act done by the board will remain valid have prescribed minimum directors
Appointment  Profit company: Shareholders are entitled to elect  Profit company: cannot change minimum number
at least 50% of directors and 50% of any alternate of elected directors.
directors  Can provide that any person has power to
appoint/remove directors.
Removal  Director may be removed by an ordinary  Cannot override shareholders’ will as expressed in
resolution at a shareholders’ meeting an ordinary resolution
Ex officio  MOI may provide for a person to be an ex officio  Can provide that a person will be regarded as an ex
director. officio director
Alternate  No requirement for an alternate director  Can provide for election/appointment of alternate
director(s)
Remuneration  No automatic right of remuneration  Can provide for payment of remuneration to
 Company may pay remuneration, unless directors
prohibited by MOI
 Remuneration paid other than i.t.o. MOI must be
approved by special resolution
Term of office  Elected for indefinite/fixed term as provided for in  Can provide for term of office of a director
MOI
Ineligibility /  Can provide additional grounds of ineligibility /
disqualification disqualification.
 Cannot override provisions in CA
Qualifications  Can prescribe minimum qualifications to be met by
directors of company

2.5 Ineligible and disqualified persons

 Ineligible person: person is absolutely prohibited from becoming a director without any exceptions.
 Disqualified person: person may still be appointed as a director of a company with the permission of the court.
 Disqualifications thus not absolute: court has discretion on application to allow such persons to be directors.
 Exception: a person who has been prohibited from being a director by a court of law,
Ineligible persons:
1. Juristic person
2. Unemancipated minor / person under similar legal disability
3. Person who does not satisfy any requirement in MOI

Disqualified persons:
1. No discretion:
a. Person prohibited by a court of law from becoming a director
b. Person who has been declared to be delinquent by a court of law
 c. Person disqualified i.t.o. MOI
2. Discretion allowed: (section which allows discretion):
a. Unrehabilitated insolvent – s 69(11)
b. Person prohibited i.t.o. any public regulation – s 69(11)
c. Person removed from an office of trust because of dishonesty – s 69(11) / s 69(12)
d. Person convicted & imprisoned without the option of a fine for theft, fraud, forgery, perjury or other
offences listed in the Act – s 69(11) / s 69(12)
2.6 Director disqualifications: exemptions
 Section 69(11): gives a court a discretion to exempt certain disqualified persons
 Section 69(12): gives shareholders of certain private companies an opportunity to avoid this disqualification
2.6.1 Exemptions by a court
See above list of disqualified persons for where discretion of court is allowed.
Ex Parte Schreuder: Applicant committed fraud, contravened Insolvency Act and afterwards applied to become a
director. Court decided that CA grants court discretion to decide whether or not to allow a person to act as director.
Ex Parte Tayob: Applicants were convicted of bribery and a year later applied for permission to act as directors. Court
decided too little time had elapsed to prove that applicants had been rehabilitated.
Requirements for applying to court from exemption from disqualification:
 Applicant must prove to court that he/she has been rehabilitated from his/her wrongful ways & can be trusted.
 To determine whether applicant has proved honesty/trustworthiness, court considers: (Ex Parte Schreuder)
 Nature of offence
 Circumstances under which the offence was committed
 Applicant’s behaviour since commission of offence
 Whether applicant committed any other offences with an element of dishonesty
 To what extent entities that applicant is involved in trusts him/her
 Applicant’s business acumen and knowledge of companies
 Time period elapsed between conviction & date of application
2.6.2 Director disqualifications: exemptions for certain private companies
Ex Parte Barron: Applicant was tried and convicted of fraud (ostrich leather/feather). Was previously director of
several private companies in which only he & his wife were shareholders. Subsequently applied to court to allow him to
be a director. Court held that factors which affect the discretion of the court are the following:
 Type of offence
 Whether or not it was a first conviction
 Type of punishment imposed
 Whether applicant wished to be a director of a private or a public company
 Attitude of shareholders and whether all shareholders supported the application
Court held that it could be more lenient in cases where a private company is affected.

Section 69(12): Despite being disqualified, a person may act as a director of a private company if:
 All the shares are held by the disqualified person; or
 All the shares are held by the disqualified person and persons related to such person and each such person has
consented in writing to that person being a director of the company.
2.7 Application to declare a person delinquent or under probation
Court can order a person to be a “delinquent” or “under probation” on application from:
1. a company
2. a shareholder
3. a director
4. a company secretary or prescribed officer of a company
5. a registered trade union that represents employees of the company
6. any other representatives of the employees of a company
7. the Commission
8. the Takeover Regulation Panel
By: Grounds for application Order Effect
1–6 Person consented to serve as director while he/she was Delinquency  Declaration is unconditional
ineligible or disqualified  Subsists for lifetime of person declared delinquent
1–6 Person acted as a director whilst under probation Delinquency  Declaration is unconditional
 Subsists for lifetime of person declared delinquent
1–6 Person, whilst director, grossly abused the position of Delinquency  Declaration may be made subject to conditions court
director thinks is appropriate
 Subsists for 7 years or such longer period as determined by
the court
 Court may additionally order that person
 undertakes program of remedial education relevant to
nature of person’s conduct as director
 carries out community service
 pays compensation to any person adversely affected by
person’s conduct as director
1–6 Person took advantage of information or any Delinquency As above
opportunity contrary to s76(2)(a)
1–6 Person intentionally or by gross negligence inflicted harm Delinquency As above
upon the company / subsidiary contrary to s76(2)(a)
1–6 Person acted in a manner that amounted to gross Delinquency As above
negligence, willful misconduct or breach of trust.
1–6 Person acted in a manner contemplated in s77(3)(a), (b) Delinquency As above
or (c)
Person, whilst director, was present at a meeting and Probation  Declaration may be made subject to conditions court
failed to vote against a resolution despite the inability of thinks is appropriate
the company to satisfy the solvency and liquidity test  Subsists for a period not exceeding 5 years
 Court may additionally order that person
 undertakes program of remedial education relevant to
nature of person’s conduct as director
 carries out community service
 pays compensation to any person adversely affected by
person’s conduct as director
 be supervised by a mentor in any future participation as
a director
 be limited to serving as a director of a private company
of which that person is the sole shareholder
1–6 Person acted in a manner materially inconsistent with Probation As above
the duties of a director.
1–6 Person acted in, or supported a decision of the company, Probation As above
to act in an oppressive or unfairly prejudicial manner.
7–8 Any of the above grounds as well as: Delinquency  Declaration may be made subject to conditions court
 Person has repeatedly been subject to a compliance thinks is appropriate
notice or similar enforcement mechanisms for  Conditions can include limiting application of declaration
substantially similar conduct to one/more categories of companies.
 Person has at least twice been convicted of an offence,  Subsists for 7 years or such longer period as determined by
or subjected to an administrative fine or similar the court
penalty in terms of any legislation
 Person was director at multiple companies that were
convicted of an offence or similar penalty within a
period of 5 years.

2.7.1 Application to court to suspend or set aside a delinquency order

Application may only be made where declaration was not made unconditional and effective for the lifetime of person
declared delinquent. Person may apply to:
 3 years order of delinquency: suspend order of delinquency and have it replaced with an order of probation
 2 years after suspension of order: have order set aside
Court may not grant order unless applicant has satisfied all conditions attached to order.
2.8 First directors of a company
At incorporation of new company:
  every incorporator is deemed to be a director of such company until sufficient directors have been appointed to
meet the required minimum number of directors
 if required minim directors is not met: board must call shareholders’ meeting within 40 business days after
incorporation for purpose of electing sufficient directors to fill vacancies
2.9 Vacancies on the Board
Rosebank Television & Appliance Co v Orbit Sales Corporation: A director’s resignation becomes effective the moment
he/she communicates such to the company. Date on which resignation accepted by company = irrelevant.
Vacancies can arise as follows:
 Period for fixed term contract expires as provided for in MOI
 Person:
 resigns
 dies
 becomes incapacitated to extent that person is unable to perform functions of director & is unlikely to regain
that capacity within a reasonable time
 is declared a delinquent
 is placed under probation under conditions inconsistent with continuing to being a director
 becomes ineligible or disqualified
 ceases to hold office/title that entitled such person to be an ex officio director
 is removed from office by resolution of shareholders/board
2.10 Filling of vacancies
If vacancy arises (other than as a result of an ex officio director ceasing to hold that office):
 Must be filled by appointment; or
 Company required to hold AGM?
 Yes: at next AGM
 No: at shareholders’ meeting within 6 months after vacancy arose
 If no remaining directors resident in SA: shareholder may convene meeting
 Company must file notice within 10 days after person becomes/ceases to be director of company.
2.11 Removal of directors
2.11.1 Removal by shareholders
 Director may be removed by an ordinary resolution adopted at a shareholders’ meeting
 This is so, no matter what the terms of any agreement may provide
 Notice of meeting & resolution must be given to director prior to consideration of resolution
 Notice period: equivalent to that which shareholder entitled to receive when convening a meeting
 Director must be given reasonable opportunity to make representation before resolution is put to vote
2.11.2 Removal by BOD
Grounds upon which a director may be removed by the BOD:
 Company has more than 2 directors & it is alleged by a shareholder/director that director has become
ineligible/disqualified
 Director becomes incapacitated to extent that he/she is unable to perform functions of director & is unlikely to
regain that capacity within a reasonable time
 Director is no longer resident in SA & there are no other directors resident in SA
 Director has neglected / been derelict in performance of functions of director or the board
After resolution has been taken: director may within 20 business days apply to a court to review decision.
2.11.2.1 Removal & breach of contract
De Villiers v Jacobsdal Saltworks: Plaintiff claimed damages from company on basis that i.t.o. original articles of
association he had been appointed director for life. Articles were subsequently amended – he became subject to
election. After termination: alleged company breached contract with him. Employment contract of director was,
however, subject to terms & condition in articles of association. Plaintiff could thus not found a claim on mere alteration
of articles. Thus: person who seeks compensation must be able to show that a contract did in fact exist & was breached
when such person is removed as director.
  Removal i.t.o. CA could constitute breach of contract.
 Director will retain right to institute any claim he/she has i.t.o. the common law for damages/compensation for
loss of office/loss of any other office as consequence of being removed as director.
2.12 Board committees
 BOD may, unless MOI provides otherwise, appoint committees & delegate authority of BOD to such committee
 BOD/director will still remain liable for proper performance of a director’s duty despite delegation to committee
 Committee may include persons who are not directors of the company, provided person is not
ineligible/disqualified from being a director
 S72(4) entitles Min. of Trade & Industry to prescribe that company/class of company must have a social & ethics
committee if it is desirable in the public interest
 King Code:
 Board has duty to evaluate board committees regularly to ascertain performance & effectiveness.
 Public listed company should have at least:
1. audit committee
a.recommend appointment of external auditors
b.set principles for recommending using accounting firm of external auditors for non-audit services
c. consider whether/not interim report should be subject to review by external auditor
d.internal audit should report at all audit committee meetings
e.appointment/dismissal of head of internal audit should be with concurrence of audit committee
f. if internal & external audit is done by same firm: committee should ensure adequate segregation between 2
functions & that independence is not impaired
g.should approve internal audit work plan
2. remuneration committee
a.make recommendations to BOD on
i. remuneration packages for each executive director
ii. fees to be paid to each non-executive director
b.evaluate performance of individuals in contributing to success of company and achievement of results
3. nomination committee (recommendation)
a.Assist BOD in formal & transparent procedures in
i. board appointments
ii. company secretary
b.Review & evaluate:
i. BOD’s mix of skills & experience
ii. other qualities of board, i.e. demographics & diversity
iii. all committees & contribution of each director

2.13 Board meetings

 Board meetings may be called by directors so authorised.
 Directors’ meeting must be called:
 If required to do so by number/percentage of directors specified in company’s MOI
 If required to do so b y at least 25% of directors, where board has at least 12 members
 If required to do so where board has less than 12 members & meeting is requested by at least 2 directors
 Notice must be given to all directors of board meetings
 Form of notice & period is determined by BOD
 Majority of the directors of the board must be present at a meeting before a vote may be called
 Every director has one vote per meeting
 Majority of votes cast on a resolution is sufficient to approve the resolution
 Chairman has deciding vote in the event of a tie.
 Minutes of all decisions & any resolutions taken by board at a meeting must be kept
 Decisions that could be voted on at a meeting may instead be adopted by written consent of majority of
directors, provided all directors received notice of matter to be decided
2.14 The mandatory appointment of a company secretary
Panorama Developments (Guilford) Ltd. A company secretary has ostensible authority to conclude contracts that
concern the day to day running of the business. Thus companies are bound by contracts concluded by the secretary.
 Must be a permanent resident of SA & remain so while serving in that capacity
 Appointment:
 Public company/state owned:
 obliged to appoint company secretary who is knowledgeable/experienced in the relevant laws
 first company secretary may be appointed by:
 incorporators of the company; or
 within 40 business days after incorporation of company: directors/ordinary resolution
 Other companies: not obliged to have company secretary but may appoint one.
 Vacancy: Within 60 business days after vacancy arises: board must fill vacancy by appointing person whom
directors consider to have requisite knowledge & experience
 Possible for body corporate/partnership to be appointed to hold the office as company secretary, provided: at
least 1 employee of that juristic person/partnership is not disqualified from being secretary
 Disqualification:
 Court prohibited that person to be a director/declared person to be a delinquent
 Person has been removed from an office of trust on grounds of misconduct involving dishonesty
 Convicted & imprisoned without option of a fine for theft/fraud/forgery/perjury in connection with
promotion/formation/management of a company
 Duties:
 providing directors collectively &individually with guidance as to their duties, responsibilities and powers;
 making directors aware of any law relevant to/affecting the company;
 reporting to board any failure on part of company/director to comply with MOI/rules of the company/CA;
 ensuring that minutes of shareholders meetings, board meetings and the meetings of any committees of the
directors, or of the company’s audit committee, are properly recorded;
 certifying in company’s annual financial statements whether company has filed required returns and notices &
whether all such returns and notices appear to be true, correct and up to date;
 ensuring that a copy of company’s annual financial statements is sent to every person entitled to it
 carrying out the functions of a person designated in terms of section 33(3).
 Removal/resignation:
 BOD can take a resolution to remove a company secretary
 may resign from office by giving 1 month’s notice/less than 1 month’s notice with approval of the board
2.15 Registration of secretaries and auditors
 Every company that appoints/terminates a company secretary/auditor must file notice of the appointment /
termination with the Registrar within 10 business days after appointment/termination
 Incorporators of company can file a notice of the appointment of the company’s first company secretary as part
of the company’s Notice of Incorporation
 Company is required to maintain a record of its secretaries/auditors. Record must include:
 Name (including former name)
 Date of appointment
 Where firm/juristic person is appointed, record must include:
 Name, registration number & registered office address of firm/juristic person
 Name of any individual contemplated in s90(3) if applicable
 Any changes in the above information as they occur with the date & nature of such change.
3 Duties of Directors
3.1 Duties of Directors
 Common law position: directors have a fiduciary relationship with the company.
 CyberScene Ltd and Others v i-Kiosk Internet and Information (Pty) Ltd: even non-executive directors have a
fiduciary relationship with the company.
 Common law:
 Not excluded by CA: continues to apply except insofar as specifically amended by CA or is in conflict with a
provision of the CA
 Directors are subject to fiduciary duties to act in good faith & in best interests of company
 Directors must exercise their powers with care and skill.
 Fiduciary duties entail:
 avoiding conflict of interests between director’s personal interests and interests of the company;
 not exceeding the limitations of their power;
 maintaining an unfettered discretion; and
 exercising their powers for the purpose for which they were conferred
 Companies Act 2008:
 Partially codified regime of directors’ duties:
 I.t.o. codified duties: Director is extended to include:
 Alternate director
 Prescribed officer
 Member of a committee of a board of the company/of the audit committee of a company, regardless
whether/not person is also a member of the company’s board.
 Duties:
 Disclose to the board any personal financial interest in matters of the company
 Not to use position of director/ information obtained as director, to gain an advantage for himself or
another person, or to knowingly cause harm to the company or a subsidiary
 Disclose to BOD any material information that comes to a director’s attention
 Act in good faith and for a proper purpose
 Act in the best interests of the company
 Act with a reasonable degree of care, skill and diligence
3.2 Directors must not abuse position/information & must act in a certain way when
there is a personal financial interest
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver: (Cinema case) Directors, acting in good faith, made a profit by putting up their own
money when the company could not. After business was sold, new owners instituted action against directors for
recovery of profits made by them in breach of their fiduciary duty to the company to avoid putting themselves in a
position where duty to company conflicted with their own interests. Court held: liability to account for profits made
during the course of directorship does not depend on fraud/absence of bona fides, but from the mere fact that a profit
had been made by the director in his capacity as director and while performing his duties as director.
Robinson v Randfontein Estates Gold Mining Co Ltd: Director purchased property for himself when it was his duty to
buy it for the company and afterwards sold it to the company for a profit. Held: company was entitled to the profit made
from the transaction. Action arose because director had breached his fiduciary duty to company.
3.2.1 General
 Failure to comply with the disclosure requirements in section 75:
 Any interested person has the right to make an application to the court for an order declaring that the
transaction or agreement that had been approved by the board or by the shareholders, is valid.
 Director may make (written) advance general disclosure of personal financial interests to the shareholders/board
explaining nature & extent of the interest.
 Notice will continue to be valid until such time that it is changed or withdrawn by the same director.
  Validity of a decision of the board/ an agreement approved by the board is not affected by the personal interest
of a director/related person, provided: there is approval/ratification by ordinary resolution of the shareholders.
 S76(2): director should avoid knowingly causing harm to the company or to its subsidiary.
 S76(2)(a):
 prohibits abuse of position by director.
 protects information that director has access to while acting as a director: director is prohibited from making
use of information obtained by virtue of his office, for his own personal gain or for another person’s benefit.
3.2.2 Directors’ financial interests conflict with those of the company
2 Scenarios:
1. Director is the only director; not the only shareholder
a. must disclose any personal interest in an agreement/other matter of the company to the shareholders and
obtain prior approval by ordinary resolution before he enters into agreement
2. All other cases:
a. disclosure must be made to BOD of any personal financial interest of the director in a matter to be considered at
a board meeting and may not be present/take part in the discussion.
3.2.3 Director/related person has financial interest in matter to be discussed at meeting of BOD
 Director must:
 Disclose interest and its general nature before matter is considered at meeting
 Disclose material information relating to the matter that he is aware of
 If required to do so by other directors: disclose any observation/pertinent insights relating to matter
 Once director made disclosures, director must:
 leave the meeting
 be excluded from participating in the consideration of that particular matter.
 Director is prohibited from executing any document on behalf of the company in relation to the matter unless
specifically requested or directed to do so by the BOD
3.2.4 Director/related person acquires financial interest in agreement/other matter in which
company has interest, after approval by company of agreement has been made
 Director must disclose:
 Nature and extent of that interest
 Material circumstances relating to the director/related person’s acquisition of that interest
 Disclosure must be done promptly to the BOD or to the shareholders
3.2.5 Circumstances where disclosure of personal financial interests do not apply
 Not applicable to a director of a company w.r.t. a decision that may have an effect on
 all of the directors of the company in their capacity as directors, or
 a class of persons, despite the fact that the director is one of the members of the class of persons, unless the
only members of the class are the director or persons related or interrelated to the director.
 Not applicable to a director of a company w.r.t. a proposal to remove that director from office
 Not applicable to a company/its director, if one person holds all of the beneficial interests of all of the issued
securities of the company and is the only director of that company.

 Director does not need to disclose if he/she reasonably believes that the information is:
 Immaterial to the company
 Generally available to the public
 Known to the other directors
 Also does not need to disclose where a legal or ethical obligation of confidentiality prevents him/her from
disclosing the information
3.3 Acting in good faith and with a certain degree of care, skill and diligence
Fisheries Development Corporation of SA Ltd v Jorgensen; Fisheries Development Corporation of SA Ltd v AWJ
Investments (Pty) Ltd: “the extent of the director’s duty of care and skill depends to a considerable degree on the nature
of the company’s business and on any particular obligations assumed by or assigned to him”. Also held: Law does not
require of a director to have special business acumen and directors may assume officials will perform duties honestly.
Directors should use their powers for the real or true purpose for which these powers were given.
Test used to determine what a reasonable director would have done in same circumstances: both an objective and a
subjective test: takes into account issues such as the general knowledge, skill and experience of particular director.
3.3.1 Business judgment rule (s 76(4))
Director will be judged to have acted in best interests of company & with required degree of care, skill & diligence if:
1. he/she took reasonable steps to become informed about the matter;
2. he/she had no material personal financial interest in the subject matter of the decision or knew of anybody else
having a financial interest in the matter, or disclosed his interests; and
3. he/she made, or supported a decision in the belief that it was in the best interests of the company.

Director will also escape liability if he/she:

1. had rational basis for believing and actually believed that the decision was in the best interest of the company
2. disclosed the conflict of interest as required by the CA

Director is entitled to rely on:

1. one/more employees whom director reasonably believes to be reliable & competent in the functions performed
2. information/opinions/reports/statements provided by legal counsel/accountants/other professional persons
retained by the company
3. board/committee as to matters involving skills/expertise that director reasonably believes are matters within
that person’s professional or expert competence.
3.4 Liability of directors and prescribed officers
Director may be held liable for loss or damages suffered, or costs incurred by the company as follows:
 I.t.o. principles of the common law/provisions of the law of delict relating to breach of fiduciary duties
 Acted without authority, whilst knowing that he lacked the necessary authority.
 Took part in an act or omission whilst knowing that was it intended to defraud another
 Signed/agreed to/provided authority for the publication of false or misleading financial statements
 Signed/agreed to/authorised publication of a prospectus/a written statement containing an untrue statement or
a statement stating that consent had been given by a person to be a director of the company, when such consent
had not been given, despite knowing that the statement was false, misleading or untrue.
 Took part in a meeting or in the making of a decision where formalities prescribed by CA were not complied with
 Knew shares were not authorised: failed to vote against the issuing of unauthorised shares
 Knew securities did not comply with provisions of CA: took part in the issuing of unauthorised securities.
 Took part in the granting of options to any person, whilst knowing that the share for which the options could be
exercised or into which securities could be converted had not been authorised.
 Took part in making a decision granting financial assistance to any person for the acquisition of securities of the
company whilst knowing that the provision was in contravention of s. 44 of the Act or MOI
 Provided with financial assistance/a loan in contravention of s. 45 of the Act or MOI
 Took part in resolution approving a distribution, knowing that distribution was contrary to provisions of s. 46
 Acquisition by the company of any of its shares/shares of its holding company, in contravention of s.46 or s. 48.
 Allotment of shares contrary to any provision of Chapter 4 of the Act.
3.4.1 Business judgement rule
Rule: Director should not be held liable for decisions that lead to undesirable results, where such decisions were
made in good faith, with care and on an informed basis, which the director believed was in the best interest of the
company.
Director can thus be excused from liability where a decision was taken in line with above statement.
3.5 Indemnification and directors’ insurance
Indemnification and directors’ liability as provided for in s. 78 includes current and former directors of companies
A company may not:
 undertake not to hold a director liable for breach of fiduciary duties.
  directly/indirectly pay a fine imposed on the director of the company who has been convicted of an offence

A company may:
 take out indemnity insurance to protect a director/itself against any liability/expenses for which the company is
permitted to indemnify the director.

A company may not indemnify a director in respect of liability arising out of any of the following circumstances:
 director acted in the name company/signed anything on behalf company/purported to bind company or
authorise taking of any action on behalf of company, while knowing he/she lacked authority to do so
 acquiesced in the carrying on of company business in insolvent circumstances while knowing that it was being so
conducted
 party to an act/omission by company despite knowing act/omission was calculated to defraud a
creditor/employee/shareholder of the company, or had another fraudulent purpose
 company’s loss/liability arose from willful misconduct/willful breach of trust on the part of the director
 where director is liable to a fine for an offence in contravention of any national legislation

S78(8) allows company to claim restitution for any money paid to director in contravention of above restrictions.
4 Capacity and Representation of a Company
4.1 Legal capacity of a company and the ultra vires doctrine
Attorney-General v Mersey Railway Co: whether a particular contract falls within the capacity and powers of the
company is a question of fact. I.e. if purpose of business = hotel, acts necessary to achieve purpose, i.e. purchasing of
furniture & hiring of staff, are intra vires.

Capacity of a company: sphere of actions that a company may legally perform.

Ultra vires doctrine: based on understanding that a company exists in law only for purpose for which incorporated.
 Thus: when an act on behalf of the company falls outside its main & ancillary objects, the company does not exist
in law and consequently such an act is (according to the doctrine) not binding on the company (i.e. ultra vires act).
 However: CA: company has all the legal capacity and the powers of a natural person(s19(1)) except to the extent
that a juristic person is incapable of exercising any such power or the company’s MOI provides otherwise.
 Though MOI may limit/restrict/qualify the purposes/powers/activities of comp, any such restrictions would not
render invalid any contract that conflicts with these restrictions.
 Thus: capacity of company is not limited by main/ancillary objects/business; company thus liable for ultra vires
acts
 However: s20(6) provides: each shareholder has a claim for damages against any person who fraudulently/due
to gross negligence causes company to do anything inconsistent with CA or a limitation/restriction/qualification
on the powers of the company as stated in MOI, unless ratified by special resolution i.t.o. section 20(2)

If act inconsistent with MOI has not yet been performed: (i.e. contract not yet entered into)
 shareholders/directors/prescribed officers of the company may obtain a court order restraining the company or
directors from doing so.
 3rd party who had no actual knowledge of this limitation/qualification and acted in good faith, will in such a case
have a claim for any damages suffered as a result

If act inconsistent with CA has not yet been performed:

 shareholders/directors/prescribed officers of the company/ a trade union representing employees of the
company may obtain a court order restraining the company or directors from doing so.
4.2 Representation
Representation: relates to a person acting under the company’s authority.
 If company gives an agent authority to act on its behalf: agent possesses actual authority and will bind the
company in acts which fall within the scope of the mandate given to him.
 Authority can be given expressly (in writing or orally) or by implication.
 Whether authority has been conferred is a question of fact.
 Ostensible or apparent authority: where person purporting to conclude contract on company’s behalf lacked
actual authority and other party to contract was misled by company into believing that he did have authority
4.3 The Doctrine of Constructive Notice
Doctrine of constructive notice: provides that 3rd parties dealing with the company are deemed to be fully acquainted
with the contents of the public documents of the company.
 Section 19(4) of CA partly abolishes this doctrine: 3rd parties contracting with the company will no longer be
deemed to have had notice of the contents of the public documents of a company
 Section 19(5) of the Act provides for two exceptions:
1. A person is deemed to have knowledge of any provision of a company’s MOI in terms of section 15(2)(b)
a. Subject to condition: Notice of Incorporation containing prominent statement drawing attention to provision
2. The effect of s19(3) on a personal liability company:
a. directors and past directors of a personal liability company are jointly and severally liable, together with the
company, for any debts and liabilities of the company contracted during their respective periods of office
4.4 The Turquand Rule
 Derived from Royal British Bank v Turquand
 Outsider contracting with the company in good faith is entitled to assume that all internal requirements and
procedures have been complied with
 Company will be bound by contract even if internal requirements & procedures have not been complied with
 Exceptions to rule:
1.if outsider was aware of fact that the requirements and procedures have not been complied with
2.if the circumstances under which the contract was concluded were suspicious
 Formulated to keep an outsider’s duty to inquire into the affairs of the company within reasonable bounds.
Wolpert v Uitzigt Properties:
 Articles provided that BOD could authorise a person to sign promissory notes on its behalf.
 One of company’s ordinary directors signed promissory notes on behalf of the company without authorisation.
 Question arose: whether outsider was entitled to assume that the director was authorised to do so.
 Court held: outsider with express or constructive notice of the articles could assume that someone was
authorised to sign the notes, but not that a specific person was authorised.
 Thus: Turquand rule only comes into operation if an internal formality is required.

Tuckers Land and Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Perpellief:

 Court found: 3rd parties may not automatically assume that a branch manager/ordinary director has authority to
act on behalf of the company.
 Company may still escape liability on the ground that the person had no authority.
 Thus: for Turquand rule to come into operation: person who acted must have possessed actual authority, which
was subject to an internal formality.
4.4.1 Section 20(7) of the CA: re Turquand
 S 20(7) codifies Turquand rule by providing that:
 person dealing with a company in good faith is entitled to assume that company has complied with all of the
procedural requirements in terms of the CA, its MOI and any rules of the company, unless:
 person knew/reasonably ought to have known of any failure by the company to comply with its formal and
procedural requirements.
 Modifies Turquand rule by preventing a 3rd party from invoking the rule where he ought reasonably to have
known of non-compliance by the company.
 Differs from common law Turquand which requires that 3rd party must not have any suspicion of noncompliance
 Turquand rule has not been abolished by the statutory provision:
 S 20(8) states that s 20(7) “must be construed concurrently with, and not in substitution for, any relevant
common law principle relating to the presumed validity of the actions of a company...”.
4.5 The Doctrine of Estoppel
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd: company was bound by the acts of one of its directors
who acted like a managing director even though he had not been appointed formally to that position. By its mere
acquiescence, the company had led the third party to believe that he was the managing director and the third party had
relied on that impression.
 Estoppel applies only when the agent did not have actual authority to bind the company.
 Misrepresentation must have been made by the company as principal.
 Based on such misrepresentation: company will be estopped from denying liability if the 3 rd party can prove that:
1. The company misrepresented, intentionally or negligently, that the agent concerned had the necessary authority
to represent the company;
2. The misrepresentation was made by the company;
3. The 3rd party was induced to deal with agent because of the misrepresentation;
4. The 3rd party was prejudiced by the misrepresentation.
5 Corporate Finance: Shares and Debentures
5.1 Introduction
Debt financing: loans; could either be bank loans/debt securities issued in a similar manner as shares (debenture)
Equity financing: issuance of shares in return for money, which makes up the share capital of a company
5.2 Definition of a ‘share’
Definition 1: Standard Bank of SA Ltd v Ocean Commodities Inc: A share in a company consists of a bundle of personal
rights entitling the shareholder to a certain interest in the company, its assets and dividends.
Definition 2: CA: One of the units into which the proprietary interest in a profit company is divided.
 Shareholder has a right to share in the profits that have been declared by the company as a dividend and he/she
has a share in net assets of the company on winding up.
 Shares are a form of personal property: they can be actively traded.
5.3 Classes of shares
Shares are divided in classes according to specific rights that a share confers on its holder, i.e. the right to:
1. vote
2. information
3. share in the profits that have been declared as a divided.
4. share in the assets that are left on the winding-up of a company after the company’s creditors have been paid

 MOI of a company must set out:

 classes of shares & number of each class that company is authorised to issue (aka: authorised share capital)
 preferences, rights, limitations and other terms associated with classes of shares
 Company can, however, designate a class of shares in MOI without setting out preferences, rights or limitations
that those shares will confer: leaving it open for the BOD to decide on these terms at a later stage
 Company may only issue shares that are authorised by the MOI. However:
 company’s board may:
 increase or decrease the authorised share capital;
 reclassify any shares authorised but not issued.
 Board decides when to issue shares and how many shares must be issued, thus:
 Not all the authorised shares need to be issued.
 Board has power to increase/decrease authorised shares of company and to reclassify shares not yet issued:
 Company must then file a Notice of Amendment to the MOI to set out these changed effected by the board
 Alterations of share capital could only occur after a special resolution to such effect by the general meeting
5.3.1 Preference shares
 Preferential rights to dividends and sometimes on return of capital on winding up
 Usually: right of preference shareholders to vote is curtailed in the MOI
 However: even if the MOI curtails shareholders’ right to vote, CA provides an irrevocable right to vote on any
proposal to amend the preferences, rights, limitations and other terms associated with their shares
 Utopia Vakansie-Oorde Bpk v Du Plessis:
 Held:
 concept of “interests” is much wider than concept of “rights”.
 “affect” implies that rights or interests of preference shareholders must potentially be prejudiced by
proposed resolution
 Probable that proposed winding-up of a company will directly affect the interests of preference shareholders
and that this will still be a resolution on which preference shareholders will have right to vote i.t.o. the CA.
 Company is not allowed to only issue preference shares that do not grant their holders the right to vote:
 Must always be at least 1 class of shareholders of the company that may vote at a meeting of shareholders
and at least one class of shareholders entitled to the net assets of the company upon its liquidation
  Preferent shareholders become entitled to payment of preferential dividend only when company has made a
profit and declared a dividend. Thus:
 Arrear but undeclared dividends cannot be claimed by preference shareholders
 A dividend may, if articles permit & company complies with solvency & liquidity test, be paid out of capital.
5.3.1.1 Types of preference shares
1. Cumulative preference shares
a. If dividend is not paid 1 year: carries over until next year
b. Preference shares are presumed to be cumulative, unless presumption is displaced by company’s constitution or
terms of issue
2. Participating preference shares
a. Shareholders may in company’s constitution or terms of issue be given the right to share on a pro rata basis
together with ordinary shareholders in distributions of surplus profits after payment of preferential dividend.
3. Convertible preference shares
a. Conditions of issue may confer right to shareholders to convert all or a part of their shares to another class.
5.3.2 Ordinary shares
 Ordinary shareholders normally have the right to vote at meetings of shareholders.
 Non-voting shares are permitted under the CA.
 If a resolution is proposed to amend the preferences, rights, limitations and other terms associated with the
shares, CA provides that such shareholders have an irrevocable right to vote on such proposals
5.3.3 Deferred shares (aka founders’ shares)
 Occasionally shares are issued to the founders of a company
 Entitles holders to dividends after a prescribed minimum dividend has been paid to ordinary shareholders.
 Thus: Deferred shareholders are last in line to receive dividends.
5.3.4 Capitalisation shares (aka bonus shares)
 Permitted under the CA, unless prohibited by company’s MOI.
 Are created when a company converts its distributable profits into share capital instead of declaring dividends
 Number of shares received by each shareholder depends on his/her shareholding in the company
 If MOI permits: terms of the offer of capitalisation shares could also give the shareholders the option to rather
receive a predetermined cash amount than the capitalisation shares.
5.4 Issue of shares
 CA regards decision to issue shares as a management decision. Thus:
 Unless specifically limited in the MOI, BOD has authority to:
 issue shares without approval of the shareholders;
 increase the authorised shares of the company.
 If the voting power of a class of shares that is to be issued, is equal to/exceeds 30% of the total voting power of
all the shares of that class before the transaction(s), a special resolution by all the shareholders is required.

Circumstances in which issue of shares must be approved by special resolution: Where shares are issued to:
 future and/or current directors, or to certain prescribed officers of the company
 a person related/inter-related to the company/a director/certain prescribed officers of the company
 a nominee of a director/certain prescribed officers of the company
5.4.1 Right of pre-emption
 General rule: shareholders of private companies have a right of pre-emption to new shares issued, except for:
 Shares issued to satisfy the exercise of share options
 Capitalisation shares
 Shares not issued for a cash consideration.
 MOI may restrict/negate pre-emptive rights
5.4.2 Adequate consideration
 CA: board may only issue shares for adequate consideration.
  Board must determine what an adequate consideration for the shares will be.
 Determination of what is adequate may only be challenged on the grounds that it constituted a breach of the
standard of conduct expected of directors and is in breach of their fiduciary duties or in delict.
5.4.2.1 Issue against future payment
 Negotiable instruments, future services/benefits/payment are allowed as consideration for newly issued shares
 Shares may only be transferred to the subscriber to the extent that the instruments have become negotiable by
the company, or to the extent that the subscriber has fulfilled his future obligations.
 Shares are meanwhile issued and kept in trust.
 Voting rights attached to such shares held in trust may not be exercised
 Any distributions with respect to shares held in trust may be credited against the remaining value of the
consideration still contained in an instrument that is not negotiable by the company or for future services,
benefits or payment.
 Shares held in trust may not be transferred to a third party without the company’s express consent.
 Shares may be transferred to the subscriber on a quarterly basis to the extent that the instruments have become
negotiable by the company or the future services, benefits or payments have been satisfied.
 If negotiable instrument is dishonoured/ subscribing party has failed to fulfill his obligations i.t.o. the agreement
between him and the company, the shares must be returned to the company & cancelled.
5.5 Debentures
 Def: Document issued acknowledging that company is indebted to debenture holder in amount stated therein
 Holder of a debenture is:
 a creditor of the company;
 entitled to a copy of the company’s annual financial statements.
 Duties of the company towards debenture holders can be secured or unsecured.
 Trustee will usually be appointed to hold security on behalf of the debenture holders:
 Trustee must be unrelated to the company/its officers and must be a person who, in the board’s opinion, has
the requisite knowledge and experience to carry out the duties of a trustee.
 If company defaults on its commitments to the debenture holders, trustee will be able to enforce the security
on their behalf, without the need for every debenture holder to institute action individually.
 BOD can decide to issue debentures without approval of shareholders, unless otherwise indicated in the MOI.
5.6 Hybrid securities
 Have some of the features of both equity and debt securities: thus dual form of security
 Examples:
 Preference shares: resemble debt to extent that shares enjoy a fixed preferential return (like interest).
 Convertible debenture: carries a right to be converted into equity.
 Determining whether security is a debt security: (John Kelley Company v Commissioner of Inland Revenue)
 Whether any voting rights are attached to the security or not
 A fixed rate of interest regardless of profits
 A fixed date for repayment of capital (maturity date: indicative of debt)
 Priority of payment to preference shareholders
5.7 Securities registration and transfer
5.7.1.1 Transfer
 Shares are transferable in any manner provided for or recognised in the Act or other legislation
 Holder of securities may choose whether to hold securities in certificated or uncertificated form
 Only uncertificated securities may be transferred on the JSE Ltd.
 Bona fide transferee of uncertificated securities is protected in the case of fraud/illegality/insolvency of which he
had no knowledge
5.7.1.2 Securities register
 Every company must maintain a register of its issued securities, containing prescribed information, including:
 total number of uncertificated securities;
 names & addresses of holders to whom certificated securities were issued & no. of securities issued to each;
  number of shares held in trust;
 either the number of certificated debt instruments issued or the names and addresses of the registered
holders and beneficial holders of certificated debt instruments
 The securities register is sufficient proof of the facts recorded in it, in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
 The records of the CSD participant or CSD in respect of uncertificated securities are deemed to form part of the
company’s securities register
 Any transfer of certificated securities must be reflected in the company’s securities register:
 Entry may be made only if the transfer is evidenced by a proper instrument of transfer delivered to the
company or if transfer took place by operation of law
 Company has to record:
 name & address of transferee;
 description of the securities/interest that was transferred;
 date of transfer; and
 value of any outstanding consideration in respect of shares

5.7.1.3 Securities certificate
 Each certificate has to be signed by two persons authorised by the board but the signature can be affixed by
autographic, mechanical or electronic means
 Certificate is prima facie proof that the named securities holder owns the securities
6 Capital Maintenance
6.1 Capital maintenance
 S 48(2)(a):
 allows a company to acquire its own shares if decision to do so satisfies requirements of s 46 (distributions)
 Acquisition is considered a distribution: acquisition of its shares by a company must meet all the requirements
of a distribution, including that it must be authorised by the board & satisfy the solvency and liquidity tests
 Section 48(2)(b):
 Allows any subsidiary of a company to acquire shares in that company, subject to the conditions that:
 no more than 10% of all the issued shares of any class of shares of the company may be held by, or for the
benefit of all the subsidiaries of that company taken together; and
 no voting rights attached to those shares may be exercised while shares are held by subsidiary of company
6.1.1 Requirements for acquisition
Acquisitions of its shares by a company/its subsidiary are subject to the following: (s 48(3))
 After company/subsidiary has acquired shares, must be shares left other than convertible/redeemable shares
 Must be shares in issue that are held by shareholders other than the company’s subsidiaries
 Shares acquired by company itself must be cancelled and will thus revert to being authorised but unissued shares
6.1.2 Enforceability
 Agreement for acquisition of shares is enforceable, provided requirements of section 48(2) & (3) have been met
6.1.2.1 Suspension of purchase
 If a company is unable to fulfill its obligations i.t.o. a repurchase agreement because of the operation of section
48(2)/(3), section 48(5) provides:
 Company must apply for a court order in terms of s 48(5) (order to suspend the acquisition of shares)
 Company bears burden of proof that fulfilment of its obligations will breach the requirements of s 48(2)/(3)
 Court may make an order that is just and equitable in view of the financial circumstances of the company,
ensuring that the person to whom the company is required to make a payment in terms of the agreement is
paid at the earliest possible date, keeping in mind when the company will be able to satisfy its other financial
obligations as they fall due and payable.
6.1.2.2 Reversal of purchase
 If company acquired shares without meeting the solvency/liquidity tests or any of the other requirements of s 48,
agreement between shareholder & company i.t.o. which company would repurchase shares, remains enforceable
 However, i.t.o. section 48(6), company may within two years after the acquisition apply to court for an order
to have the repurchase reversed. Court may then order:
 person from whom the shares were bought to return the consideration received, and
 company to issue to that person an equivalent number of shares of the same class as those acquired.
 Director who:
 was present at the meeting
 when an acquisition of shares in terms of s 48 was approved, or participated in the making of this decision,
and
 who failed to vote against it
 despite knowing that the acquisition was contrary to s 46/48,
 will be liable for any loss/damages/costs sustained by company as a direct/indirect consequence of approval
6.2 Distributions
Solvency test:
 Considering all reasonably foreseeable financial circumstances of the company at that time, the assets of the
company, fairly valued, equal or exceed the liabilities of the company as fairly valued.
Liquidity test:
  Considering all reasonably foreseeable financial circumstances of the company at that time, it appears that the
company will be able to pay its debts as they become due in the ordinary course of business for a period of 12
months after the distribution.

Following actions are regarded as distributions: (regulated by s 46)

1. Direct/indirect transfer by a company of money/other property of the company, other than its own shares, to/for
the benefit of its own shareholders/those of another company within the same group of companies, by way of
a. a dividend;
b. a payment in lieu of a capitalisation share;
c. consideration for the acquisition of its own shares or those of another company in the group; or
d. any other transfer of money or property i.r.o. any of the shares of that company or of another company within
the same group of companies
2. Incurrence of a debt/other obligation by a company for the benefit of one or more holders of any of the shares of
that company/of another company within the same group of companies; or
3. Forgiveness/waiver by a company of a debt or other obligation owed to the company by one more holders of any
of the shares of that company or of another company within the same group of companies.

Distribution may be made in the following circumstances:

1. BOD must authorise distribution unless it is made i.t.o. an existing legal obligation of the company/a court order
2. Must reasonably appear that comp. will satisfy solvency & liquidity test immediately after completing distribution
3. BOD must acknowledge, by way of a resolution, that it has applied the solvency & liquidity test and reasonably
concluded that the company will satisfy this test immediately after completing the proposed distribution.
4. Distribution must be made within 120 days after the test was applied, otherwise the acknowledgement resolution
by the board must be taken again and the test must be applied again.
6.3 Options
 Option contract confers on holder the option to buy/sell specified quantity of particular share/debenture within a
stated period of time at a stated price.
 Company may grant an option:
 In return for payment made to it;
 As remuneration for services rendered/to be rendered; or
 Gratuitously
 Option holder = contingent creditor.
 CA: Company may issue options for the allotment/subscription of authorised (but unissued) shares
 BOD determines consideration/other benefit and terms upon which options are issued
 If board issues unauthorised shares contrary to the MOI or board grants any unauthorised options:
 Director who:
 was aware of the fact
 who voted in favour of granting the options/failed to vote against it despite
 will be liable for any loss/damages/costs sustained by company in consequence of unauthorised
issue/option
6.4 Financial assistance for the purchase of shares
 S 44 of the CA: a company may assist a person in acquiring shares and other securities in the company, provided
that such assistance is not prohibited by the MOI and that certain requirements are met.
 Decision to assist person to acquire shares in company rests with BOD: must be in accordance with conditions:
 Any restrictions i.t.o. MOI have been complied with
 Financial assistance is given in pursuance of an employee share-scheme
 Recipient must be either a specific recipient or of a category of recipient for whom a special resolution was
passed within the previous 2 years that approved such assistance.
 Board is satisfied that:
 immediately after providing assistance company would comply with solvency & liquidity tests
 terms under which financial assistance is to be given are fair & reasonable to the company
 Failure to comply with provisions in s 44:
  transaction would be null & void; and
 responsible directors would incur personal liability for the loss suffered by the company

6.4.1 Circumstances in which s 44 will be applicable

Lipschitz v UDC Bank Ltd: held: a transaction must be assessed in two phases:
1. Must be ascertained whether there was financial assistance.
a. Gradwell (Pty) Ltd v Rostra Printers Ltd: impoverishment test: determine whether financial assistance provided:
i. Considers whether a transaction will have the effect of leaving the company poorer.
ii. If so, financial assistance was provided.
b. Lipschitz: held: providing security/otherwise exposing the company to risk qualifies as financial assistance:
i. If person obtains a loan to purchase shares in company & company stood surety for loan: financial assistance
ii. If company buys asset from person in order to enable person to purchase shares in company: will depend on
the facts whether there was financial assistance. Factors that assist in determination:
1. whether company needs the asset in its normal business and
2. whether the company paid a fair price for it.
c. Jacobson v Liquidator of M Bulkin & Co Ltd: decision as to whether/not financial assistance has been provided
should not be based on the likelihood of loan becoming irrecoverable or of a security being enforced due to
default of the principal debtor.
2. Must be determined whether assistance was for purpose of acquiring shares in the company.
a. Fidelity Bank Ltd v Three Women (Pty) Ltd: fact that a particular transaction which facilitated the purchase of
shares did not serve any legitimate commercial interest of the company led the court to conclude that the
purpose of the transaction was indeed to give assistance for the purchase of shares.

 When a transaction passes these two phases: will have to comply with s 44 to be valid.
 If it was not financial assistance/ assistance was not in connection with purchase of shares, s 44 is not relevant.
7 Groups of Companies
7.1 Introduction
Regulation by CA of company groupings is necessary for two important reasons:
1. There should be proper accounting as there is a danger, particularly where holding company is a private company,
that some financial information could be concealed from shareholders or creditors of the holding company.
2. Act attempts to prevent abuse which could arise as a result of control by the holding company over subsidiary.
Abuse most likely to occur: subsidiary makes a loan to/provides security in favour of holding company/its directors
7.2 Definitions
Essential idea of a group: the existence of control through one company of one or more subsidiary companies.
Companies Act 61 of 1973: group of companies: a holding company, not itself being a wholly owned subsidiary,
together with all the companies being its subsidiaries.
Companies Act 71 of 2008: group of companies: two or more companies that share a holding company or subsidiary
relationship.
7.3 Holding and subsidiary companies under the 1973 Companies Act
Section 1(3): detailed definition of a subsidiary company.
Section 1(4): company is deemed a holding company of another if the other company is a subsidiary.

The holding-subsidiary relationship is defined i.t.o.:

1. control over the majority of voting rights in the company;
2. control over the right to appoint/remove directors, having a majority of voting rights at board meetings;

Thus: whoever has control over voting rights or the right to appoint/remove directors is the holding company.

Also: if a company is a member of another company and has sole control of the majority of voting rights in that
company, whether pursuant to an agreement of other members or otherwise, the company that has such control is
classified as a holding company.
7.4 The 2008 Companies Act: subsidiary relationships
Changes definition of a subsidiary company, but in general terms retains broad architecture of definition in the CA of
1973: based on the majority of voting rights or the right to appoint directors holding the majority of votes in the board.
Control is determined by an analysis of voting power.
7.5 Group of companies
CA: a group of companies means two or more companies that share a holding company or subsidiary relationship.
7.6 Legal consequences of a group of companies
Consequences that flow from the existence of a group:
1. HC must produce group annual financial statements before its AGM;
2. SC may not hold more than 10% of the shares of its HC
3. Prescribed information must be disclosed where SC makes a loan to/provides security for its HC/fellow subsidiary;
4. Where SC has independent BOD: HC does not owe the subsidiary any fiduciary duties;
5. Director of SC does not owe a fiduciary duty to the HC;
6. S4(1)(a): company satisfies solvency test if assets of the company or, if the company is a member of a group of
companies, the aggregate assets of the company, as fairly valued, is equal to/exceed the liabilities of the company
or, if the company is a member of a group of companies, the aggregate liabilities of the company, as fairly valued

SC = subsidiary company;
HC = holding company;
8 Takeovers, Offers and Fundamental Transactions
8.1 Introduction
Affected transactions:
 Transaction is referred to as an affected transaction if a regulated company is involved.
 Takeover Regulation Panel has jurisdiction over the transaction.
 Includes:
 disposal of all/the greater part of the assets or undertaking of a regulated company;
 merger or amalgamation involving at least one regulated company; and
 a scheme of arrangement between a regulated company and its shareholders
Fundamental transactions:
 May involve regulated or unregulated companies.
 Will be an affected transaction if a regulated company is involved.
 Includes:
 disposals of all/the greater part of the assets or undertaking of a company;
 amalgamations or mergers;
 and schemes of arrangement.
8.2 Fundamental transactions
8.2.1 Disposal or sale of all or the greater part of the assets or undertaking of a company
 Disposal /sale of all or the greater part of the assets of a company constitutes a fundamental transaction
 If a regulated company is involved: also constitutes an affected transaction.
 Occurs where a company decides to dispose of/sell more than 50% of its assets or undertaking
 Regulated by S 112 of the CA
 Company may only dispose/sell all/the greater part of its assets or undertaking if following requirements are
met:
1. Proposed disposal is approved by a special resolution of the shareholders;
2. Notice of shareholders’ meeting to consider resolution is accompanied by a written summary of the terms of
the transaction; and
3. Assets or undertaking to be disposed of are given a fair market value.
 Requirements do not apply where the transaction is:
1. as a result of a business rescue plan;
2. between a HC and its wholly-owned subsidiary;
3. between 2 or more wholly-owned subsidiaries of the same HC; and
4. between a wholly-owned subsidiary on the one hand, and its HC and one or more wholly-owned subsidiaries
of that HC, on the other hand.
8.2.2 Amalgamations or mergers
 A transaction/series of transactions
 involving two/more companies
 resulting in
 the survival of one/more of the amalgamating or merging companies; or
 the formation of one or more new companies,
 which together hold all of the assets & liabilities previously held by the several merging/amalgamating
companies.

 Constitutes a fundamental transaction & is also affected transaction if it involves one/more regulated companies
 Regulated by s 113 of the CA.
 Merger/amalgamation may only take place if following requirements are met:
1. Upon completion of transaction each amalgamated/merged company must satisfy the solvency &liquidity test
2. Proposed merger/amalgamation is approved by a special resolution of the shareholders;
3. Notice of shareholders’ meeting to consider resolution is accompanied by a summary of:
 a. amalgamation or merger agreement; and
b. provisions of ss 154 & 164: containing particulars of a special resolution & appraisal rights respectively
 It is the duty of the board of each amalgamating/merging company to consider whether, upon completion of the
transaction, each proposed amalgamated or merged company will satisfy the solvency and liquidity test.
 Companies intending to amalgamate/merge, must enter into a written agreement setting out the terms of the
amalgamation/merger. Particulars that must be included in the agreement:
1. The proposed MOI of any new company to be formed by the amalgamation/merger;
2. The name and identity number of each proposed director;
3. The manner in which the securities of each amalgamating/merging company are to be converted into
securities of any proposed amalgamated/merged company, or exchanged for other property;
4. If any of the securities of any of the amalgamating/merging companies are not to be converted into securities
of any proposed amalgamated/merged company, the consideration that the holders of those securities are to
receive in addition or instead of securities of any proposed amalgamated/merged company;
5. Details of the proposed allocation of the assets and liabilities of the amalgamating/merging companies among
the companies that will be formed or continue to exist when the agreement has been implemented
6. Details of any arrangement or strategy necessary to complete the amalgamation or merger;
7. The estimated cost of the proposed amalgamation or merger.
8.2.3 Scheme of arrangement
 Any arrangement/agreement between the company and any class of its security holders (which would include
shareholders), including a reorganisation of the share capital of the company
 Company may, on the initiative of the board and subject to approval by special resolution, implement any
scheme of arrangement between the company and the holders of any class of its securities.
 Arrangement/agreement may involve:
1. a consolidation of securities of different classes;
2. a division of securities into different classes;
3. an expropriation of securities from the holders thereof;
4. an exchange of its securities for other securities;
5. a re-acquisition by the company of its securities in terms of s 48 (see study unit 6); or
6. a combination of the above.
 Constitutes a fundamental transaction & is also affected transaction if it involves one/more regulated companies
 Company may not propose scheme of arrangement if in liquidation/in the course of BRP.
8.2.3.1 Independent expert & report
 An independent expert must be retained by the company proposing the arrangement, to compile a report
concerning the proposed scheme of arrangement.
 The report must be furnished to the board and to the security holders involved in the proposed scheme.
 Minimum contents of the report:
1. All prescribed information relevant to the value of the securities affected
2. Identify every type & class of holders of the company’s securities affected
3. Description of material effects that the proposed arrangement will have on the rights & interests of persons
mentioned in above point
4. Evaluation of any material adverse effects of the proposed arrangement against:
a. Compensation that any of those persons affected will receive i.t.o. the arrangement
b. Any reasonably probable beneficial & significant effect of the arrangement on the business & prospects of
the company
5. Statement of any material interest of any director/trustee for security holder, & statement of the effect of the
arrangement on those interests & persons
6. Inclusion of a copy of ss 115 & 164
 Expert must be impartial and independent of the company. Expert must thus not:
 have any relationship with the company/securities holders;
 have had any such relationship in the previous 2 years;
 be related to any person who has or has had such a relationship.
8.2.4 Court intervention in the implementation of fundamental transactions
Court may intervene with the implementation of any fundamental transaction.
Notwithstanding any special resolution, a company may not proceed with the implementation of any proposed
fundamental transaction if:
1. Special resolution approving proposed transaction was opposed by at least 15% of the voting rights that were
exercised on that resolution.
a. Any person who voted against the resolution may require that the company obtain court approval;
b. If court is approached, proposed transaction may not proceed without the sanction of the court;
2. Court finds that:
a. resolution is manifestly unfair to any class of security holders;
b. the vote was materially tainted by conflict of interest, inadequate disclosure, failure to comply with the CA,
the MOI or any other applicable company rules; or
c. finds any other significant procedural irregularity and as a result orders that the resolution be set aside.

A security holder who voted against the proposed fundamental transaction can seek an appraisal remedy i.t.o. which
he/she can have his/her securities independently valued and re-purchased by the company at a fair price.
Aggrieved security holder may only seek an appraisal remedy if he:
1. had notified the company in advance of his intention to oppose the special resolution; AND
2. was present at the meeting and voted against the special resolution
8.3 Affected transactions
8.3.1 Affected transactions and regulated companies
Takeover Regulation Panel is required to regulate affected transactions.
Affected transactions include:
1. disposal of all/a greater part of the assets or undertaking of a regulated company
2. merger/amalgamation involving at least one regulated company
3. scheme of arrangement between a regulated company and its shareholders
4. acquisition/disposal of (or announcement of intention to acquire/dispose of) a beneficial interest in voting
securities of a regulated company to the extent contemplated in section 122:
a. where a person acquires enough securities of a class with the result that he holds a beneficial interest
b. beneficial interest: a person has a right/is entitled to
i. receive or participate in dividends i.r.o. the company’s securities;
ii. exercise any/all of the rights attaching to the securities (i.e. right to vote); or
iii. dispose of the securities
5. an announced intention to acquire a beneficial interest in the remaining voting securities of a regulated company
that are not already held by a person or persons acting in concert
8.3.1.1 Regulated companies
Types of regulated companies:
1. Public company;
2. State owned enterprise unless exempted i.t.o. s 9; or
3. Private company:
a. if percentage of issued securities of that company that have been transferred within a 24 month period before
the affected transaction or offer exceeds percentage prescribed by the Minister:
i. Prescribed percentage: Minister, after consultation with the Takeover Regulation Panel may prescribe a
minimum percentage of not less than 10% of the issued securities which would bring the company within the
application of Part B, C of Chapter 5 and the Takeover Regulations.
b. if the MOI expressly provides that the company and its securities are subject to Parts B and C and the Takeover
Regulations, irrespective of whether the company falls within above criteria.
8.4 Takeover Regulation Panel
 TRP replaces the Securities Regulation Panel to regulate affected transactions.
 CA establishes the TRP as an organ of state within the public administration but outside the public service.
 Comprises of:
 Commissioner of the Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission;
Commissioner of the Competition Commission;
3 persons designated by the exchanges; and
a number of persons appointed by the Minister who have knowledge and experience in the regulation of
securities and takeover.
 Required to:
 regulate affected transactions & offers to the extent provided for in Chapter 5 and the Takeover Regulations;
 investigate complaints relating to affected transactions and offers;
 consult with the Minister i.r.o. changes to the Takeover Regulations;
 regulate affected transactions in order to promote the integrity and fairness in the marketplace;
 ensure the provision of adequate information and time to allow informed decisions to be made by companies
and holders of securities; and
 prevent actions that may frustrate or defeat takeover offers.
8.4.1 Approval f or affected transactions
 Any person proposing an affected transaction must comply with the reporting or approval requirements set out
in the Takeover Regulations (unless exempted).
 Person may not give effect to transaction unless he has received a clearance notice/been granted an exemption
 TRP may require the filing of various documents for approval and issue clearance notices if the transaction
satisfies the applicable requirements of the CA.
8.4.2 Complaints & compliance
 TRP may
 initiate/receive complaints;
 conduct investigations; and
 issue compliance notices in accordance with Chapter 7 or the Takeover Regulations
 Complaints can be filed:
 by a person him/herself in relation to an affected transaction;
 may be initiated directly by the TRP; or
 at the request of another regulatory authority or the Minister
 Objections to compliance notices are made to:
 Takeover Special Committee; or
 a court so that the notice can be reviewed
 After considering representations the Takeover Special Committee/the court may confirm/modify/cancel all or
part of the notice and then the applicant must comply with it.
 A decision by the Takeover Special Committee is binding subject to any right of review or appeal by a court.
8.5 Common types of affected transactions
8.5.1 Mandatory offers
Transaction where one or more persons who are related or interrelated or are acting in concert attain a prescribed
percentage of all voting securities in the company (currently not less than 35%).
Upon obtaining such prescribed percentage, such person or persons are required to make an offer for all outstanding
securities in the company.
A mandatory offer is triggered when:
1. regulated company re-acquires any of its voting securities i.t.o. s 48.
2. person(s) acquires a beneficial interest in any voting securities issued by a regulated company allowing the
person(s) to exercise at least the prescribed % of all voting rights attached to securities of the company.
Within one day after the date of a completed mandatory offer, the person(s) must give notice in the prescribed
manner to the holders of the remaining securities, including in that notice:
1. A statement that they are in a position to exercise at least the prescribed % of all the voting rights attached to the
securities of that regulated company
2. Offering to acquire any remaining such securities on terms determined by the CA and the Takeover Regulations.
 Within one month after giving notice, the person(s) must deliver a written offer, in compliance with the Takeover
regulations, to the holders of the remaining securities of the class, to acquire those securities.
8.5.2 Compulsory acquisitions and squeeze out
Transaction where:
 Within 4 months after the date of an offer for the acquisition of a class of securities of a regulated company
 where offer has been accepted by at least 90% of the class (other than securities already held by offeror, related
parties, concert parties, nominee and subsidiaries before the offer)
 offeror may notify the outstanding holders of securities that:
 the offer has been accepted to that extent; and
 the offeror wishes to acquire all remaining securities of that class.
 offeror then entitled to acquire them on the same terms as the original offer

Within 30 business days of receiving an offer, a person may apply to court for an order:
 that the offeror is not entitled to acquire the applicant’s securities of that class; or
 imposing conditions of acquisition different from those of the original offer.
9 Business Rescue Proceedings
9.1 Introduction
Affected person:
1. a shareholder or creditor of the company;
2. any registered trade union representing employees of the company; and
3. if any of the employees of the company are not represented by a registered trade union, each of those
employees or their respective representatives
Business rescue:
Proceedings to facilitate the rehabilitation of a company that is financially distressed by providing for:
1. the temporary supervision of the company, and of the management of its affairs, business and property;
2. a temporary moratorium on the rights of claimants against the company or in respect of property in its
possession; and
3. the development and implementation, if approved, of a plan to rescue the company by restructuring its
affairs, business, property, debt and other liabilities, and equity in a manner that maximises the likelihood of
the company continuing in existence on a solvent basis or, if it is not possible for the company to so continue
in existence, results in a better return for the company’s creditors or shareholders than would result from the
immediate liquidation of the company;
Financially distressed:
1. it appears to be reasonably unlikely that the company will be able to pay all of its debts as they fall due and
payable within the immediately ensuing six months; or
2. it appears to be reasonably likely that the company will become insolvent within the immediately ensuing six
months;
Independent creditor:
Person who:
1. is a creditor of the company, including an employee of the company who is a creditor in terms of section
144(2); and
2. is not related to the company, a director, or the practitioner, subject to subsection (2);

2 ways in which BRP may be commenced:

1. Resolution by the BOD of the company
2. Court order
9.2 Resolution by board of directors to begin business rescue
9.2.1 Procedure
1. BOD may take a formal decision to begin BRP i.r.o. the company under certain specified circumstances:
a. BOD must have reasonable grounds for believing that company is financially in distress; and
b. that there appears to be a reasonable prospect of recuing the company.
2. If BOD has reasonable grounds to believe that company is financially distressed, but decides not to take a
resolution to commence BRP, a notice must be delivered to every affected person explaining why they believe the
company to be financially distressed and why they have not adopted a business rescue resolution.
3. Resolution may not be adopted if steps to liquidate the company have already been initiated
4. Once resolution has been taken and for as long as it is valid, company may not commence liquidation proceedings
5. Resolution will become effective only when it is filed with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission,
thus: BRP officially commence on day of filing.
9.2.2 Notification
1. Within 5 business days after filing the resolution the company must notify every affected person regarding the
resolution, the date on which it became effective and the grounds on which it was taken.
2. If company does not notify affected persons as prescribed, resolution will become null and void and company will
only be allowed to file another resolution with the leave of the court.
9.2.3 Appointment of a business recue practitioner
1. Within 5 business days after filing the resolution the company must appoint a business recue practitioner.
2. Person(s) must meet the requirements of s 138 & provide his/her written consent to be appointed.
3. Within 2 business days after the practitioner has been appointed, company must file notice of his/her appointment
with the Commission.
4. Within 5 business days after filing the notice the company must make a copy of the notice of appointment
available to every affected person
5. Failure in any above steps results in null & void procedure.
9.3 Court order to commence business rescue proceedings
9.3.1 Procedure
1. If company has not adopted a resolution to commence BRP, an affected person may apply to a court for an order
to commence BRP and place the company under supervision.
2. Applicant must serve a copy of the application on the company and the Commission and notify each affected
person of the application.
3. Each affected person has the right to take part in the hearing of this application..
4. Application for BRP may be made after proceedings for liquidation of the company has begun
a. This will have the effect of the suspending of the liquidation proceedings until:
i. The court has refused the application for business rescue; or
ii. If the court approves the application, until BRP have ended
5. Court may also while hearing an application for liquidation at any time make an order as if an application for BRP
has been made.
9.3.2 What the court may do
Court may make an order placing company under supervision and commencing BRP if it is satisfied that:
1. Company is financially distressed; or
2. Company has failed to pay over any amount due to a government authority i.t.o. a statutory obligation i.r.o.:
a. its employees (i.e. unemployment insurance); or
b. money due in terms of a contractual obligation (i.e. medical aid fund).
3. It is otherwise just & equitable to do so for financial reasons, and there is a reasonable prospect of recuing the
company.
4. Court may also appoint an interim business recue practitioner nominated by the applicant.
a. Appointment will be subject to approval by the majority in value of the independent creditors at the first
meeting of creditors.
5. If court does not grant an order for business recue: it may dismiss the application and make any further order that
may be necessary, including placing the company under liquidation.

 Company may not place itself under liquidation until business recue has completed
 Company must notify each affected person within 5 business days after the date of the order
 Trade unions must, through the Commission and under conditions as determined by the Commission, be given
access to company financial statements for purposes of initiating a business rescue process.
9.4 Legal consequences of business rescue proceedings
9.4.1 Moratorium
1. A moratorium is placed on most civil legal proceedings against the company for as long as the rescue continues
2. Enforcements of claims against the company/its property may be started/continued only with the written consent
of the business recue practitioner or if the court gives permission.
3. If any right/claim against the company must be enforced in within a specified time, the period during which the
company is in BRP will not be counted.
9.4.2 Protection of property interests
1. Power of company to deal with its property during business recue is restricted.
2. Company may only dispose of property if it takes place:
a. In the ordinary course of its business;
 b. In a transaction of good faith to which the business rescue practitioner has given his/her written consent; or
c. As part of an approved rescue plan for the company.
3. No person may deal with any property that is in the lawful possession of the company, even if the company is not
the owner thereof, unless the business rescue practitioner has given his/her written consent.
4. If company wants to sell any property over which a creditor holds security rights (i.e. mortgage bond), company
does not have to ask creditor’s permission if the proceeds of the sale will be enough to pay him/her in full.
9.4.3 Post-commencement finance
1. In order to secure finance s 135(2) allows the company to use its assets as security for post-commencement loans
2. S 135(2) provides that these creditors, irrespective of whether they were given security for their claims, must be
repaid before any other unsecured creditors.
3. Any employment related payments that become due post-commencement must be paid even before other post-
commencement financing is paid.
4. If liquidation proceedings later replace BRP, creditors will retain their preferential right.
9.4.4 Employment contracts & employees
Employment contracts:
 BRPs have no effect on company's contracts with its employees: they continue to be employed by company on
the same terms & conditions as before.
 Employees & company may, however, in accordance with applicable labour legislation, agree to different T&C’s.
 Any retrenchment of employees is subject to all the relevant labour legislation.

Unpaid remuneration before BRP:

 Employee becomes a preferred unsecured creditor of the company.
 However, a medical scheme/pension fund/provident scheme to which company owes money at commencement
of business rescue is an unsecured creditor of the company

Employees’ committee:
1. Employees may form a committee of employees’ representatives.
2. The business rescue practitioner must convene a meeting of the employees or their representatives within 10
business days after his/her appointment to inform them about the company's future:
a. Employees decide at this meeting whether/not to appoint an employees’ committee.
3. Committee:
a. may consult with the business rescue practitioner;
b. must ensure that the employees’ interests are properly represented;
c. members may not give instructions to the business rescue practitioner.
9.4.5 Other contracts
 Business rescue practitioner may partially/entirely cancel/suspend almost any of the company’s other contracts
during BRP, even if the agreement provides that this may not be done.
 Other party to contract may claim only damages from the company and not, i.e., specific performance of the
contract.
9.4.6 Shareholders
 No alteration in classification or status of any issued shares of the company is allowed during BRP, unless
authorised by the court or contained in an approved business rescue plan.
 Shareholders of the company are also “affected persons”: thus have the right to be notified of important events
& to participate in court proceedings and BRP to the extent allowed by the Act.
 Shareholders do not have the right to vote on business rescue plan, except for any shareholder whose rights will
be affected by the plan.
 If a business rescue plan is rejected:
 a shareholder who was present at the meeting may propose that a new plan be developed,
 any shareholder may make an offer to take over the interests of some or all creditors or shareholders.
9.4.7 Directors
 Directors must:
  continue to perform their duties during business rescue procedure, but must do so under the authority and
according to all reasonable instructions of the business rescue practitioner.
 co-operate with the business rescue practitioner;
 deliver books and records of the company to him/her; and
 within 5 business days after the beginning of BRP provide him or her with a statement of the company’s
affairs containing the prescribed information.
 Director cannot be held liable for breach of his statutory duties if he/she follows the instructions of the business
rescue practitioner, unless:
 he/she acts on behalf of the company knowing that he has no authority to do so; or
 takes part in reckless trading or fraudulent conduct by the company
 Acts for which approval of the business rescue practitioner is required will be void if performed by a director or
the board without necessary approval.
9.4.7.1 Removal
 The business rescue practitioner may apply to court for the removal of a director if:
 director fails to comply with any provisions of the Act regulating a director’s conduct during business rescue;
 hinders business rescue practitioner in the performance of his duties or in carrying out a business rescue
plan."
 Right of certain persons to apply to court for an order declaring director delinquent/under probation also exists
during the business rescue procedure.
9.5 The business rescue practitioner
9.5.1 Qualifications
The qualifications for appointment as a business rescue practitioner are that the person must:
1. be a member in good standing of the professional organisation chosen by the Minister to regulate the practice of
business rescue practitioners;
2. not be subject to an order of probation i.t.o. s 162(4);
3. not be disqualified from acting as director of the company in terms of s 69(8);
4. not have any relationship with the company that could interfere with the proper performance of his or her duties,
or be related to a person who has such a relationship.
9.5.2 Removal and replacement
 Business rescue practitioner can only be removed from office by an order of court.
 Order i.t.o. s 139 may be made:
 on application by an affected person; or
 on the court’s own initiative, based on any of the grounds stipulated in s 139(2).
 Grounds include: incompetence, negligence, unethical/illegal conduct, inability to perform functions, he/she
no longer meets the requirements for appointment as a business rescue practitioner as set out in s 138.
 If business rescue practitioner dies/resigns/is removed from office, a new business rescue practitioner must be
appointed by the company or, if applicable, by the creditor who nominated the previous one.
9.5.3 Powers and duties
9.5.3.1 Management
 Takes over the full management of the company from the board and other managers, but:
 may delegate any of his or her powers or functions to a director/other member of management.
 May also appoint a new member of management/an advisor
 if such a person has any other relationship with the company that might cast doubt on his or her
impartiality/integrity, court must approve appointment.
 May remove a director from office with the permission of the court.
 Take necessary steps to have problems rectified.
 Must have possible criminal acts investigated.
9.5.3.2 Investigation
 Must investigate the affairs of the company a.s.a.p. after appointment and decide whether the company has a
reasonable chance of being rescued.
 If he then/at any other time during BRP finds that company doesn’t have reasonable chance of being rescued:
 he must inform the court, the company and all affected persons and apply to court for the BRP to end and for
company to be placed in liquidation.
 As soon as he/she discovers that the company is no longer financially distressed, he/she must likewise inform the
abovementioned parties and take steps to terminate the BRP.
 If an order of court commenced the BRP/confirmed them after an application had been heard to set them
aside, he/she must apply to court for its termination.
9.5.3.3 Rescue plan
He/she must develop a rescue plan for the company and, if the plan is adopted, to see to its implementation.
9.5.3.4 Liability
 Business rescue practitioner:
 has all the duties and responsibilities of a director
 is liable for a breach of these duties in the same way as a director in terms of ss 75 to 77,
 may not be held liable for anything done or omitted in good faith in his/her capacity as business rescue
practitioner, unless he or she was grossly negligent.
 may not be appointed as liquidator of the company if company is liquidated when the business rescue ends
9.5.3.5 Remuneration
 Will be entitled to payment by the company in accordance with a tariff prescribed by the Minister
 May also enter into an agreement with company that he will be paid an additional fee if a rescue plan is adopted
or any specified result is achieved in the business rescue proceedings.
 Agreement will be binding on company only if approved by:
 majority in value of creditors who attend the relevant meeting; and
 majority of shareholders who are entitled to a portion of the residual value of the company on liquidation.
 A creditor/shareholder who voted against approval of the agreement may apply to court within 10 business
days after the date of voting to have the agreement cancelled on the grounds that it is not just and equitable,
or that it is highly unreasonable in the light of the company’s financial circumstances.
9.6 The rights of creditors during BRP
9.6.1 Right to participate
 Creditors have the right to be notified of and formally and informally participate in all stages of the proceedings.
 Play a particularly important role in voting on the amendment, approval or rejection of the business rescue plan.
9.6.2 Creditors’ committee
 Business rescue practitioner must convene a meeting of creditors within 10 days after appointment to:
 inform them of the company’s future; and
 to allow them to prove their claims against the company.
 Creditors have the right to form a creditors’ committee to represent their interests
 Business rescue practitioner is obliged to consult creditors’ committee during development of the business
rescue plan
 Creditors’ committee may not direct or instruct the business rescue practitioner in any way.
9.6.3 Voting rights
 When creditors vote on any decision regarding BRP: each creditor has a voting interest equal to the value of his
claim against the company, irrespective of whether the claim is secured or unsecured.
 A concurrent creditor whose claim would be subordinated in liquidation will, however, have a vote based only on
the amount, if any, that he or she could reasonably expect to receive in the case of liquidation.
 A decision needs only the support of the holders of a majority of the voting interests of the independent
creditors to be a valid and binding decision by creditors.
9.7 The business rescue plan
9.7.1 Preparation
 Duty of the business rescue practitioner to prepare a business rescue plan for the company:
 He/she must consult the creditors, other affected persons and management of the company when doing so .
9.7.2 Prescribed contents
 Rescue plan must contain all the information affected persons may need to decide whether they should accept or
reject the plan.
 Part A - Background to the business rescue plan
 Must contain complete lists of the assets and liabilities of the company, indicating which assets are held as
security by creditors and specifying whether a creditor is a secured, preferent or concurrent creditor.
 Must stipulate dividend that creditors will probably receive should the company be liquidated.
 Must also contain:
 a complete list of holders of issued securities of the company;
 a copy of the agreement stipulating the business rescue practitioner’s fees; and
 a statement as to whether the plan includes any proposal made informally by a creditor.
 Part B – Proposals
 All proposed measures to assist company in overcoming its problems & managing its debts are explained
 Must contain details of:
 any moratorium;
 release from payment of debts or conversion of debts into equity that are planned;
 which assets of the company will be used to pay creditors and in what order they will be paid;
 effect the plan will have on the holders of each class of the company’s securities; and
 comparison of benefits creditors will receive if plan is adopted against what they would receive if company
were placed in liquidation.
 Future plans of the company and how existing contracts will be dealt with must be set out in this part.
 Part C - Assumptions and conditions
 Must contain details of:
 any conditions that must be fulfilled before plan can come into operation, or before it can be fully
implemented;
 what the effect of the plan will be on the number of employees and their conditions of employment;
 under which circumstances the rescue plan will come to an end; and
 a projected balance sheet and statement of income and expenses for the next three years based on the
assumption that the plan will be adopted.
 Certificate
 Plan must conclude with a certificate by the business rescue practitioner in which he/she states:
 the information provided in the plan appears to be correct; and
 the projections, based on this information, have been made in good faith.
9.7.3 Publication of the plan
 Plan must be published within 25 business days after appointment of the business rescue practitioner unless the
court, on application, or holders of the majority of creditors’ voting rights allow additional time for this to be done
9.7.4 Meeting to consider the business rescue plan
 Business rescue practitioner must convene a meeting of company’s creditors to consider the rescue plan
 Meeting must take place within 10 business days after publication of the plan.
 Affected persons must be notified of the meeting at least 5 business days before it is due to take place
 Business rescue practitioner must explain the plan to the meeting and inform the meeting as to whether he/she
still believes that there is a reasonable prospect of the company being rescued.
 Representatives of the employee s must be given an opportunity to address the meeting.
 Meeting may discuss & propose amendments to the plan before voting on its approval.
 Plan is regarded as finally approved if plan is:
 supported by more than 75% in value of all the creditors who voted;
 at least 50% in value of independent creditors who voted;
  no rights of shareholders of any class are altered.
 If the rights of any shareholders are altered by the plan, approval by creditors is only a preliminary approval, and
plan must also be approved by the majority of the relevant shareholders at a meeting convened for this purpose.
9.7.5 Effect of approval
 Approval of rescue plan makes it binding on company and all its creditors and holders of its securities,
irrespective of whether such a person voted for/against the plan or even attended meeting where the plan was
considered.
 All debts may therefore only be enforced in accordance with the rescue plan.
 The business rescue practitioner must take all necessary steps to fulfill any conditions to which implementation
of the plan may be subject, and to implement the plan itself.
 As soon as the rescue plan has been substantially implemented, the business rescue practitioner must file a
notice to this effect with the Commission.
9.7.6 Effect of rejection
 If plan is rejected by creditors or, where applicable, by the shareholders, business rescue practitioner may either:
 seek approval from the relevant meeting to prepare a revised plan; or
 inform them that the company will apply to court to have the result of their votes set aside on the grounds
that the majority decision was irrational or inappropriate.
 If business rescue practitioner fails to do either of the above, any affected person present at the meeting may ask
for approval of a proposal that the business rescue practitioner must prepare a revised plan, or may apply to
court for an order setting aside the result of the voting on the same grounds as above.
 Alternatively, one or more affected persons may make an offer to purchase the voting interests of any of the
persons who opposed the plan, thereby obtaining enough votes for approval of the plan at the next meeting that
must be held within five business days.
 In cases where the business rescue practitioner has to prepare and publish a new plan, he or she must do so
within 10 business days after the meeting and then go through the whole process for approval all over again.
 If nobody takes an y of the above actions, the business rescue practitioner must file a notice of termination of the
BRP with the Commission.
9.8 Termination of rescue proceedings
 The BRP is intended to take no more than three months in total.
 If it cannot be completed within 3 months after being commenced, the business rescue practitioner may apply to
court for more time.
 Should the proceedings not be completed within 3 months (or longer period allowed by the court), the business
rescue practitioner must deliver a monthly report on the progress of the BRP to each affected person and to the
court (if the proceedings were started by a court order) or otherwise to the Commission, until the termination of
the business rescue procedure.
 BRPs are terminated in one of three ways:
 an order of court setting aside the resolution or order that commenced the proceedings or converting the
rescue into liquidation proceedings;
 a notice of termination filed with the Commission by the business rescue practitioner; or
 a business rescue plan that has either been adopted and substantially implemented, as confirmed by the
business rescue practitioner in a filed notice, or rejected without any further steps being taken.
10 Abbreviations
AGM: Annual General Meeting
BOD: Board of directors
BRP: Business rescue proceedings
CA: Companies Act 71 of 2008
HC = holding company;
MOI: Memorandum of Incorporation
SC = subsidiary company;