SSPC SP 10 PDF
SSPC SP 10 PDF
COATINGS
You are granted the right to download an electronic file of this SSPC standard
for temporary storage on one computer for purposes of viewing and/or printing
a single copy for individual use. This copy may be may only be distributed
to other employees within your organization and only for information or
instructional purposes. Neither the electronic file nor the printed hard copy
may be reproduced or distributed in any other way without the express written
permission of SSPC.
DISCLAIMER
It should be understood by all persons using this product that SSPC does not
give any warranties, expressed or implied, nor make any representations as
to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information or conclusions
contained herein, nor assume any responsibility of any nature from whatever
cause including negligence resulting from the use of this product.
SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2
September 1, 2000
Editorial Revisions November 1, 2004
2-81
SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2
September 1, 2000
Editorial Revisions November 1, 2004
2.2 Random staining shall be limited to no more than 4.1 Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil, grease,
5 percent of each unit area of surface as defined in Section or other contaminants shall be removed in accordance with
2.6, and may consist of light shadows, slight streaks, or minor SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods.
discolorations caused by stains of rust, stains of mill scale, or
stains of previously applied coating. 4.2 Before blast cleaning, surface imperfections such as
sharp fins, sharp edges, weld spatter, or burning slag should
2.3 Acceptable variations in appearance that do not affect be removed from the surface to the extent required by the
surface cleanliness as defined in Section 2.1 include variations procurement documents (project specification). Additional
caused by type of steel, original surface condition, thickness of information on surface imperfections is available in Section
the steel, weld metal, mill or fabrication marks, heat treating, A.5 of Appendix A.
heat affected zones, blasting abrasives, and differences in the
blast pattern. 4.3 If a visual standard or comparator is specified to
supplement the written standard, the condition of the steel
2.4 When a coating is specified, the surface shall be rough- prior to blast cleaning should be determined before the blasting
ened to a degree suitable for the specified coating system. commences. Additional information on visual standards and
comparators is available in Section A.4 of Appendix A.
2.5 Immediately prior to coating application, the entire
surface shall comply with the degree of cleaning specified
herein.
2-82
SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2
September 1, 2000
Editorial Revisions November 1, 2004
5. Blast Cleaning Methods and Operation 7. Procedures Following Blast Cleaning and
Immediately Prior to Coating
5.1 Clean, dry compressed air shall be used for nozzle
blasting. Moisture separators, oil separators, traps, or other 7.1 Visible deposits of oil, grease, or other contaminants
equipment may be necessary to achieve this requirement. shall be removed according to SSPC-SP 1 or another method
agreed upon by those parties responsible for establishing
5.2 Any of the following methods of surface preparation the requirements and those responsible for performing the
may be used to achieve a near-white blast cleaned surface: work.
5.2.1 Dry abrasive blasting using compressed air, blast 7.2 Dust and loose residues shall be removed from pre-
nozzles, and abrasive. pared surfaces by brushing, blowing off with clean, dry air,
vacuum cleaning, or other methods agreed upon by those
5.2.2 Dry abrasive blasting using a closed-cycle, recir- responsible for establishing the requirements and those re-
culating abrasive system with compressed air, blast nozzle, sponsible for performing the work. NOTE: The presence of
and abrasive, with or without vacuum for dust and abrasive toxic metals in the abrasives or paint being removed may place
recovery. restrictions on the methods of cleaning permitted. Comply with
all applicable regulations. Moisture separators, oil separators,
5.2.3 Dry abrasive blasting using a closed cycle, recircu- traps, or other equipment may be necessary to achieve clean,
lating abrasive system with centrifugal wheels and abrasive. dry air.
5.3 Other methods of surface preparation (such as wet 7.3 After blast cleaning, surface imperfections that remain
abrasive blasting) may be used to achieve a near-white blast (e.g., sharp fins, sharp edges, weld spatter, burning slag,
cleaned surface by mutual agreement between those parties scabs, slivers, etc.) shall be removed to the extent required
responsible for establishing the requirements and those re- in the procurement documents (project specification). Any
sponsible for performing the work. NOTE: Information on the damage to the surface profile resulting from the removal of
use of inhibitors to prevent the formation of rust immediately surface imperfections shall be corrected to meet the require-
after wet blast cleaning is contained in Section A.9 of Appendix ments of Section 2.4. NOTE: Additional information on surface
A. imperfections is contained in Section A.5 of Appendix A.
6. Blast Cleaning Abrasives 7.4 Any visible rust that forms on the surface of the steel
after blast cleaning shall be removed by recleaning the rusted
6.1 The selection of abrasive size and type shall be based areas to meet the requirements of this standard before coat-
on the type, grade, and surface condition of the steel to be ing. NOTE: Information on rust-back (re-rusting) and surface
cleaned, type of blast cleaning system employed, the finished condensation is contained in Sections A.6, A.7, and A.8 of
surface to be produced (cleanliness and roughness), and Appendix A.
whether the abrasive will be recycled.
8. Inspection
6.2 The cleanliness and size of recycled abrasives shall
be maintained to ensure compliance with this specification. 8.1 Work and materials supplied under this standard are
subject to inspection by a representative of those responsible
6.3 The blast cleaning abrasive shall be dry and free of for establishing the requirements. Materials and work areas
oil, grease, and other contaminants as determined by the test shall be accessible to the inspector. The procedures and times
methods found in SSPC-AB 1, AB 2 and AB 3. of inspection shall be as agreed upon by those responsible
for establishing the requirements and those responsible for
6.4 Any limitations on the use of specific abrasives, the performing the work.
quantity of contaminants, or the degree of allowable embed-
ment shall be included in the procurement documents (project 8.2 Conditions not complying with this standard shall be
specification) covering the work, because abrasive embedment corrected. In the case of a dispute, an arbitration or settlement
and abrasives containing contaminants may not be acceptable procedure established in the procurement documents (project
for some service requirements. NOTE: Additional information specification) shall be followed. If no arbitration or settlement
on abrasive selection is given in Section A.2 of Appendix A. procedure is established, then a procedure mutually agreeable
to purchaser and supplier shall be used.
2-83
SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2
September 1, 2000
Editorial Revisions November 1, 2004
8.3 The procurement documents (project specification) Commentary (SSPC-SP COM). It is important to recognize that
should establish the responsibility for inspection and for any blasting abrasives may become embedded in or leave residues
required affidavit certifying compliance with the specifica- on the surface of the steel during preparation. While normally
tion. such embedment or residues are not detrimental, care should
be taken to ensure that the abrasive is free from detrimental
9. Safety and Environmental Requirements amounts of water-soluble, solvent-soluble, acid-soluble, or
other soluble contaminants (particularly if the prepared steel is
9.1 Because abrasive blast cleaning is a hazardous opera- to be used in an immersion environment). Criteria for selecting
tion, all work shall be conducted in compliance with applicable and evaluating abrasives are given in SSPC-AB 1, “Mineral
occupational and environmental health and safety rules and and Slag Abrasives,” SSPC-AB 2, “Cleanliness of Recycled
regulations. NOTE: SSPC-PA Guide 3, “A Guide to Safety Ferrous Metallic Abrasives,” and SSPC-AB 3, “Ferrous Metallic
in Paint Application,” addresses safety concerns for coating Abrasives
work.
A.3 SURFACE PROFILE: Surface profile is the roughness
10. Comments of the surface which results from abrasive blast cleaning. The
profile depth (or height) is dependent upon the size, shape,
10.1 Additional information and data relative to this standard type, and hardness of the abrasive, particle velocity and angle
are contained in Appendix A. Detailed information and data are of impact, hardness of the surface, amount of recycling, and the
presented in a separate document, SSPC-SP COM, “Surface proper maintenance of working mixtures of grit and/or shot.
Preparation Commentary.” The recommendations contained The allowable minimum/maximum height of profile is usu-
in Appendix A and SSPC-SP COM are believed to represent ally dependent upon the thickness of the coating to be applied.
good practice, but are not to be considered requirements of the Large particle sized abrasives (particularly metallic) can produce
standard. The sections of SSPC-SP COM that discuss subjects a profile that may be too deep to be adequately covered by a
related to near-white blast cleaning are listed below. single thin film coat. Accordingly, it is recommended that the
use of larger abrasives be avoided in these cases. However,
Subject Commentary Section larger abrasives may be needed for thick film coatings or to
Abrasive Selection ................................................6 facilitate removal of thick coatings, heavy mill scale, or rust.
Film Thickness ....................................................10 If control of profile (minimum/maximum) is deemed to be sig-
Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning .............................. 8.2 nificant to coating performance, it should be addressed in the
Maintenance Repainting ....................................4.2 procurement documents (project specification). Typical profile
Rust-back (Re-rusting) .........................................8. heights achieved with commercial abrasive media are shown
Surface Profile ....................................................6.2 in Table 5 of the Surface Preparation Commentary (SSPC-SP
Visual Standards ................................................. 11 COM). Surface profile should be measured in accordance with
Weld Spatter....................................................4.4.1 NACE Standard RP0287 (latest edition), “Field Measurement
of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel Surfaces
Using Replica Tape,” or ASTM(1) D 4417 (latest edition), “Test
Appendix A. Explanatory Notes
Method for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast
Cleaned Steel.”
A.1 FUNCTION: Near-white blast cleaning (SSPC-SP
10/NACE No. 2) provides a greater degree of cleaning than
A.4 VISUAL STANDARDS: SSPC-VIS 1, "Guide and
commercial blast cleaning (SSPC-SP 6/NACE No. 3) but
Reference Photographs for Seel Surfaces Prepared by Dry
less than white metal blast cleaning (SSPC-SP 5/NACE No.
Abrasive Blast Cleaning," provides color photographs for the
1). It should be used when a high degree of blast cleaning
various grades of surface preparation as a function of the initial
is required. The primary functions of blast cleaning before
condition of the steel. The series A-SP 10, B-SP 10, C-SP 10,
coating are: (a) to remove material from the surface that can
D-SP 10 and G-SP 10 photographs depict surfaces cleaned
cause early failure of the coating system and (b) to obtain a
to a near-white blast grade. Other available visual standards
suitable surface roughness and to enhance the adhesion of
are described in Section 11 of SSPC-SP COM.
the new coating system. The hierarchy of blasting standards is
as follows: white metal blast cleaning, near-white blast clean-
A.5 SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS: Surface imperfec-
ing, commercial blast cleaning, industrial blast cleaning, and
tions can cause premature failure when the service is severe.
brush-off blast cleaning.
Coatings tend to pull away from sharp edges and projections,
leaving little or no coating to protect the underlying steel. Other
A.2 ABRASIVE SELECTION: Types of metallic and non-
features that are difficult to properly cover and protect include
metallic abrasives are discussed in the Surface Preparation
crevices, weld porosities, laminations, etc. The high cost of
(1)
ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
2-84
SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2
September 1, 2000
Editorial Revisions November 1, 2004
the methods to remedy surface imperfections requires weigh- A.8 DEW POINT: Moisture condenses on any surface
ing the benefits of edge rounding, weld spatter removal, etc., that is colder than the dew point of the surrounding air. It is,
versus a potential coating failure. therefore, recommended that the temperature of the steel
Poorly adhering contaminants, such as weld slag residues, surface be at least 3 °C (5 °F) above the dew point during dry
loose weld spatter, and some minor surface laminations may blast cleaning operations. It is advisable to visually inspect for
be removed during the blast cleaning operation. Other surface moisture and periodically check the surface temperature and
defects (steel laminations, weld porosities, or deep corrosion dew point during blast cleaning operations and to avoid the
pits) may not be evident until the surface preparation has been application of coating over a damp surface.
completed. Therefore, proper planning for such surface repair
work is essential because the timing of the repairs may occur A.9 WET ABRASIVE BLAST CLEANING: Steel that is wet
before, during, or after the blast cleaning operation. Section abrasive blast cleaned may rust rapidly. Clean water should be
4.4 of SSPC-SP COM and NACE Standard RP0178 (latest used for rinsing. It may be necessary that inhibitors be added
edition), “Fabrication Details, Surface Finish Requirements, to the water or applied to the surface immediately after blast
and Proper Design Considerations for Tanks and Vessels to cleaning to temporarily prevent rust formation. The use of
be Lined for Immersion Service” contain additional information inhibitors or the application of coating over slight discoloration
on surface imperfections. should be in accordance with the requirements of the coating
manufacturer. CAUTION: Some inhibitive treatments may
A.6 CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION: Steel contaminated interfere with the performance of certain coating systems.
with soluble salts (e.g., chlorides and sulfates) develops
rust-back rapidly at intermediate and high humidities. These A.10 FILM THICKNESS: It is essential that ample coating
soluble salts can be present on the steel surface prior to blast be applied after blast cleaning to adequately cover the peaks of
cleaning as a result of atmospheric contamination. In addition, the surface profile. The dry film thickness of the coating above
contaminants can be deposited on the steel surface during the peaks of the profile should equal the thickness known to be
blast cleaning if the abrasive is contaminated. Therefore, needed for the desired protection. If the dry film thickness over
rust-back can be minimized by removing these salts from the the peaks is inadequate, premature rust-through or failure will
steel surface,, and eliminating sources of recontamination occur. To assure that coating thicknesses are properly measured
during and after blast cleaning. Wet methods of removal are the procedures in SSPC-PA 2 (latest edition), “Measurement
described in SSPC-SP 12/NACE No. 5. Identification of the of Dry Coating Thickness with Magnetic Gauges” should be
contaminants along with their concentrations may be obtained used.
from laboratory and field tests as described in SSPC-Guide
15, "Field Methods for Retrieval and Analysis of Soluble Salts A.11 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PAINTING: When this
on Steel and Other Nonporous Substrates.” standard is used in maintenance painting, specific instructions
should be given on the extent of surface to be blast cleaned
A.7 RUST-BACK: Rust-back (re-rusting) occurs when or spot blast cleaned to this degree of cleanliness. In these
freshly cleaned steel is exposed to moisture, contamination, cases, the cleaning shall be performed across the entire area
or a corrosive atmosphere. The time interval between blast specified. For example, if all weld seams are to be cleaned
cleaning and rust-back will vary greatly from one environ- in a maintenance operation, this degree of cleaning shall be
ment to another. Under mild ambient conditions, if chemical applied 100% to all weld seams. If the entire structure is to be
contamination is not present (see Section A.6), it is best to prepared, this degree of cleaning shall be applied to 100% of
blast clean and coat a surface the same day. Severe condi- the entire structure. SSPC-PA Guide 4 (latest edition), “Guide
tions may require more expedient coating application to avoid to Maintenance Repainting with Oil Base or Alkyd Painting
contamination from fallout. Chemical contamination should be Systems,” provides a description of accepted practices for
removed prior to coating (see Section A.6). retaining old sound coating, removing unsound coating, feath-
ering, and spot cleaning.
2-85