Module 1 The Teacher and The Community
Module 1 The Teacher and The Community
MODULE 1
1.1 Introduction to Society, Community and Education- Defining the Basic Concept
As a starter activity, PSTs have group discussions on the meaning of the basic concepts and share their
expectations on what the subject will be all about.
Basic Concepts to be defined:
1. Society
2. Community
3. Education
4. Social Interaction
5. School Culture
National
International/Gl obal
Three Social Science Theories that provides models of examining society which in turn
provides the bases for educational changes.
SCHOOL
Consensus Social
and Conflict Theory Science Theories of Interactionism
Education
describes society as with two faces – consensus and conflict and that sociological theory should be
divided into two parts – consensus theory and conflict theory.
Consensus is defined as the widespread agreement among all members of a particular society.
Consensus Theories view shared norms and values as fundamental to society. It is the people’ shared
norms and values that ensure the order, peace and stability in the society. Consensus theories focus on
social order based on tacit or implied agreements. Any change that happens in a society is slow, gradual,
and orderly.
In Consensus Theory, the emphasis is on social order, stability or social regulation. The theory is
concerned with the maintenance or continuation of social order in society in relation to accepted norms,
values, rules and regulations as widely accepted or held collectively by the society. It emerged out of
social order, social stability or social regulation.
While, conflict is a disagreement or clash between opposing ideas, principles or people that may be
covert or overt. Conflict theories emphasize the dominance of some social groups over others. Social
order is the result of the dominance and manipulation of the strong groups over the weak. Social change
is seen as occurring rapidly and disorderly as the subordinate group tries to overthrow the dominant
group, (Ritzer in Vega, et al., 2015, p. 2). Horton and Hunt (1984 in Vega, et al. 2015,) argued that the
focus of the conflict theory is the heterogeneous nature of society and the disparity, inequality in the
distribution of political and social power. Groups that have vested interest, and with political, social, and
economic power wok for rules and laws, that serve their own interests, to be passed to the exclusion of
others. A struggle between the two social classes – the dominant and the dominated; the powerful and
the powerless- occurs.
The discussion of the conflict theory is on the emergence of conflict and what causes it. The theory
emerges out of the incompatible aspects of human society; its conflicts, crisis and social change. Conflict
Theorists are interested in how social institutions – family, government, religion, education, economic
institutions and the media – may help to maintain the power and privileges of some groups and keep
others in a subservient or subordinate position. They advocate for social change resulting from the
redistribution resources. In that sense, people who support conflict theories are viewed as radicals and
social activists, (Ballantine & Spade in Vega, et al. 2015, p.2).
How do schools contribute to the unequal distribution of people into jobs in society so that more powerful
members of society maintain the best positions and the less powerful groups are allocated to lower ranks
in society?
What is the role of education in maintaining the prestige, social- political-economic power and position of
the dominant group while maintaining the lower social position and status of the dominated-subservient
group?
Karl Marx argued that society is characterized by class conflicts or the conflict between the bourgeoisie
(the rich owners of production) and the proletariat (the poor workers or working class). From this class
struggle or class conflict, interpreters of the theory posit that social change may emerge from this conflict.
On the issue of the role of schools in maintaining the dominance of the powerful over the powerless, Max
Weber argued that schools teach and maintain particular “status cultures” through which groups in
society with similar interests and positions in the status hierarchy are able to maintain their status, their
power, their dominance. Schools are often seen as rather homogenous in their composition of students
and they teach to those students thus perpetuating that “status culture”.
Parson was not only interested in the structural components of the social system, but he was also
interested in examining the function of social systems. It is believed that systems exist because they are
able to meet the needs of society in its particular situations. Parsons listed the Functional Requisites of a
Social System:
1.Social system must be structured so that they operate compatibly with other systems.
2.To survive, the social system must have the requisites from other systems.
3.The system must meet a significant proportion of the needs of its actors.
4.The system must elicit adequate participation from its members.
5.It must have at least a minimum of control over potentially disruptive behavior.
6.If conflict becomes sufficiently disruptive, it must be controlled.
7.A social system requires a language in order to survive.
Functionalist explains that a society assumes a particular form because that form works well for the
society and develops certain characteristics because those characteristics meets the needs of that
society. The key principles of the functionalist perspective as identified by Farley (in Vega et al. 2015,
p.6):
1. Interdependence. This is one of the most important principles of the functionalist theory – society
is made up of interdependent parts and that every part of society is dependent to some extent on other
parts of society. What happens in one affects the other parts.
2. Functions of Social Structure and Culture. It is assumed that each part of the social system exists
because it serves some function. This idea is applied to both the social structure and culture.
a. Social Structure refers to the organization of society, including its institutions, its social positions,
and its distribution of resources.
b. Culture refers to a set of beliefs, language, rules, values, and knowledge held in common by
members of a society.
3. Consensus and Cooperation. Societies have a tendency toward consensus, to have certain basic
values that nearly everyone in the society agrees upon. Societies tend toward consensus in order to
achieve cooperation. Inability to cooperate will paralyze the society and people will have to devote a great
effort to fighting one another rather than getting anything done.
4. Equilibrium. Equilibrium is a characteristic of society th at has achieved the form that is best
adapted to its situation. When society has reached a state of balance or equilibrium, it will remain in that
condition until it is forced to change by some new condition.
Assessment:
Activity: The PSTs will be required to do research and preliminary reading on the philosophical and
sociological perspectives on education in the context of the community.
The structural functional model addresses the question of social organization and how it is maintained,
(Durkheim & Spencer in Vega, et al., 2015, p.8). It has its roots in Natural Science and the analogy
between a society and an organization. In the analysis of living organisms, the task of the scientists is to
identify the various parts (structures) and determine how they work (function). In the study of society, a
sociologist tries to identify the structures of society and how they function, thus the name, STRUCTURAL
FUNCTIONALISM.
The component parts of social structure are:
1.Families
2.Neighborhood
3.Associations
4.Schools
5.churches
6.banks
7.countries, etc.
Functionalism
stresses interdependence of the social system
examines how parts are integrated with each other
compares society with a machine, where on part articulates with another to produce the dynamic
energy required to make the society work
stresses the processes that maintain social order by stressing consensus and agreement
understands that change is inevitable and underscores the evolutionary nature of change
acknowledges that conflict between groups exists, functionalism believe that without a common
bond to unite groups, society will integrate
Functionalism examines the social processes necessary to the establishment and maintenance of
social order, (Ballantine & Spade in Vega, et al., 2015, p.8).
Structural Functionalism
Emphasizes social order and social stability and not social conflict
Explains that society is made up of different institutions or organizations that work together in
cooperation – to achieve their orderly relationship and to maintain social order and social
stability. The maintenance of society emanates from internal rules, norms, values, and
regulations of these various ordered institutions.
Modern Functionalist Theories of education have their origin in the work of Talcott Parsons (Ballantine &
Spade in Vega, et al. 2015). Parsons believe that education is a vital part of a modern society. Schooling
performs an important function in the development and maintenance of a modern, democratic society,
especially with regard to equality of opportunity for all citizens. In modern societies, education is the key
institution in a meritocratic selection process.
Education also plays a significant function in a political democracy. Schools provide citizens with the
knowledge and dispositions to participate actively in civic life. In an ever increasingly technical society,
schools provide students with the skills and dispositions to work in such a society. Although schools teach
students specific work skills, they also teach students how to learn so they may adapt to new work roles
and requirements.
Functionalist and Conflict Theories have been criticized as being highly abstract and whose emphases
are on social structure and processes which are at a macro-level. Critics of conflict and functionalist
theories argued that while those two levels of analysis help us to understand education in the big picture
or at a macro level, they hardly provide us with an interpretable snapshot of what schools are like on a
day-to-day basis, or what transpires in the classroom between teacher and students and between
students and students. Thus a theory which focuses on micro-level of analysis has emerged, (Vega, et al.
2015).
Interactionist Theories
Interactionist Theories attempt to make the commonplace, strange by noticing, focusing their attention
and observing the everyday-taken-for-granted behaviors and interactions between students and students,
and between teachers and students. It is what conflict and functionalist theories do not notice, do not
focus their attention to, do not question that is most problematic to the interactionists.
Symbolic Interactionism
Interactionist Theory is traced back to the works of sociologists George Herbert Mead and Charles Horton
Cooley. They examined the ways in which the individual is related to society through ongoing social
interactions. This school of thought, known as Social Interactionism, views the self as socially constructed
in relation to social forces and structures and the product of ongoing negotiations of meanings. Thus, the
social self is an active product of human agency rather than a deterministic product of social structure.
The social self is a result of social interaction mediated by symbols, in particular, language. The distinctive
attributes of human behavior is viewed as the result of individuals’ participation in varying types of social
structures which in turn is dependent on the existence of language behavior. Symbolic Interactionism is
not only interested in socialization but also in interaction. Interaction is significant in terms of (a)
development of one’s ability to think, and (b) development of one’s ability to express what s/he thinks. All
types of interaction, not just interaction during socialization, refine our ability to think which in turn shapes
the interaction process.
However, not all forms of social interactions require mental processing or will involve our ability to think.
They are Non- Symbolic Interaction or in the term used by George Herbert Mead, the conversation of
gestures which does not involve thinking. Blumer made the differentiation between those two basic forms
of social interaction, namely (1) non-symbolic interaction which does not involve thinking, and (2)
symbolic interaction which require mental processing, (Vega, et al. 2015, p.11).
Objects are seen simply as out there in the real word. What is important is the way they are defined or
interpreted by the individuals experiencing those objects. Such interpretations lead to a relativistic view
that objects may have different meanings for different individuals. Example: a shoe for a shoemaker may
be his source of livelihood or an expression of his artistic talent; a shoe for a poor kid may be a source of
frustration for not owning a pair; a shoe for a teenager may be a source of pride, a status symbol.
Related to the idea of the self as a social construct is the concept of the looking glass self-put forward by
early symbolic interactionist theorist, Charles Horton Cooley. The concept of the looking glass self
suggests that we come to develop an understanding of who we are and who we are not, a self- definition,
on the basis of the words or actions of others towards us. The looking glass self-forwards the idea We
see ourselves as others see us. A student may acquire the idea that s/he is smart or dumb, likeable or
unlikeable, pretty or ugly from what others tell him/her; or how others make him/her feel about
himself/herself. Cooley explained that we use other people as a mirror into which we look to see what we
are like, (Farley in Vega, et al., 2015, p.12).
Questions for Reflection:
1.Who are you in the eyes and words of other people?
a.Do you accept your own self- image as presented to you by others without question?
b.Do you like what you see in the mirror ?
2.What is your interpretation of the following and reflect on the effects of your interpretation on your
behavior?
a.A kind-hearted teacher
b.A teacher known for failing students; or a teacher known for passing all students despite absences and
failing quizzes and exams
c.A classmate who is very active in class
d.A classmate who smokes and into fraternity/sorority
From: Vega, V.A., Prieto, N.G. & Carreon, M.L. (2015). Social Dimensions of Education. Q.C.: Lorimar
Publishing, Inc.
Multiculturalism is also defined as a policy that emphasizes the unique characteristics of different cultures,
especially as they relate to one another in receiving nations. Multiculturalism is a systematic and
comprehensive response to cultural and ethnic diversity, with educational, linguistic, economic and social
components, and specific institutional mechanisms. Multiculturalism is viewed as a model of democratic-
policy- response to culture and ethnic diversity because it corresponds to the ideal of culture of peace
based on respect of diversity, as well as universally shared values and norms.
Multicultural education is a tool for establishing pride and confidence among students in their unique and
special backgrounds. This theory concentrates on the need of including notions of race, class and
diversity while teaching. According to James Banks (in Vega, et al. 2015), the goal of multicultural
education is to transform the school so that male and female students, exceptional students, and students
from diverse cultural, social class, racial and ethnic groups experience an equal opportunity to learn. A
key assumption of multicultural education is that students are more likely to achieve when the total
classroom climate is more consistent with their diverse cultures and learning styles.
2.Knowledge Construction Process – describes how teachers help students understand, investigate and
determine how the biases, frames of reference, and perspectives within a discipline influence the ways in
which knowledge is constructed within it. Students also learn how to build knowledge themselves in this
dimension.
3.Prejudice Reduction. It describes lessons and activities used by teachers to help students develop
positive attitudes toward different racial, ethnic, and cultural groups. Lessons, units and teaching
materials that include content about different racial and ethnic groups can help students develop more
positive intergroup attitudes if certain conditions exist in the teaching situation. These conditions include
positive images of the ethnic groups in the materials and the use of the multiethnic materials in a
consistent and sequential way.
4. Equity Pedagogy exists when teachers modify their teaching in ways that will facilitate the
academic achievement of students from diverse racial, cultural, and social class groups.
5. Empowering School Culture and Social Structure. This is created when the culture and
organization of the school are transformed in ways that enable students from diverse racial, ethnic, and
gender groups to experience equality and equal status.
Assessment:
PSTs, in small groups, will create graphic organizers showing their insights gained from research and
readings.
Teacher-facilitated discussion to summarize and consolidate researches and reforms in education.
Learner-centered discussion will highlight how the philosophical and sociological perspectives are
demonstrated in practical classroom situations.
Groups choose an appropriate graphic organizer to describe how philosophies and sociological theories
are manifested in the practical classroom situation in response to community contexts. Process:
discussion of concepts and effective use of charts and/or diagrams
Output: appropriate graphic organizer
PSTs will write an essay explaining how education was shaped by the philosophical and sociological
perspectives of the time, focusing on how education responds to the needs of the society and community.