Modeling of Fire Fighting System
Modeling of Fire Fighting System
Technology
College of Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Prepared by:
1. Mohammed Dawelbait Bilaila Hammad
2. Musab Albasheer Mohammed Alnoor
3. Mustafa Adam Alzain Adam
Supervisor:
Dr. Alsawi Abdallah Yahya
October 2017
ﺑﺴﻢ اﻟﻠﻪ اﻟشﺣﻤﻦ اﻟشﺣﯿﻢ
)(35ﺳﻭسة اﻟﻧﻭساﻵﯾﺔ
i
EDICATION
To
To
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iii
Abstract
iv
اﻟﻣﺳﺗﺧﻠص
اﻟحشائﻖ ﻣﻥ اﻟﻣﺧﺎطش اﻟسئﯾﺳﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ ﺗﺗﺳﺑب ﻓﻲ أﺿساس ﻭﺧﯾﻣﺔ ,ﻟرا ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧظﺎﻡ اﻟﺣﻣﺎﯾﺔ
ﻣﻥ اﻟﺣسﯾﻖ ﯾؼﺗﺑس ﻧظﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻣﺎ ﻟﻣﺧﺗﻠف ﻣﺟﺎﻻت اﻟﻬﻧدﺳﺔ ﻣﺛل ﻫﻧدﺳﺔ اﻟﻣؼﻣﺎس ﻭاﻟﻬﻧدﺳﺔ
اﻟﻛﻬسﺑﺎئﯾﺔ ﻭاﻟﻬﻧدﺳﺔ اﻟﻣﯾﻛﺎﻧﯾﻛﯾﺔ .ﻧظﺎﻡ ﻣﻛﺎﻓﺣﺔ اﻟﺣسﯾﻖ ﯾساػﻲ ػﻣﻠﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﻣﻭػﺔ أﻫذاف ﻣﺛل ؛
ﻣﻧغ اﻧدﻻع اﻟﻧﯾساﻥ ﻭﺗﻘﻠﯾل اﻷﺿساس اﻟﻧﺎﺟﻣﺔ ػﻥ اﻟﻧﯾساﻥ ﻭ ػﻣل ﺑؼض اﻹﺟساءات ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎل
إﻧدﻻع اﻟﻧﯾساﻥ.
ﻫﻧﺎك اﻟؼدﯾد ﻣﻥ اﻷﻧظﻣﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ ﺗﺳﺗﺧدﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺻﻣﯾﻡ أﻧظﻣﺔ ﻣﻛﺎﻓﺣﺔ اﻟﺣسﯾﻖ إػﺗﻣﺎدا ػﻠﻲ
اﻟﻣﺎدة اﻟؼﺎﻣﻠﺔ اﻟﻣﺳﺗﺧدﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻧظﺎﻡ .ﻓﻲ ﻫزا اﻟﻤششﻭع ﺗﻡ إﺳﺗﺧداﻡ ﺣﺎﻟﺗﯾﻥ ﻣﺧﺗﻠﻔﺗﯾﻥ ﻟﺗﺣﻠﯾل
ﻧظﺎﻣﯿﻦ ﻣﻦ أﻧظﻤﺔ ﻣﻛﺎﻓﺣﺔ اﻟﺣسﯾﻖ ,اﻟﺣﺎﻟﺔ اﻷﻭﻟﻲ ػﺑﺎسة ػﻥ ﻣﺴتﻮدع ﺗخضﯾﻦ اﻟﻤالﺑس ,ﻓﻲ
ﻫزﻩ اﻟﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﻡ ﺗطﺑﯾﻖ ﻧظﺎﻡ اﻟسﺷﺎﺷﺎت اﻟسطب ﺑﺈﺳﺗﺧداﻡ اﻟطشﯾﻘﺔ اﻟﺗﺣﻠﯾﻠﯾﺔ ﻭ ﺑسﻧﺎﻣﺞ اﻟﻣﺣﺎﻛﺎة
ﻭﺗﻣت اﻟﻣﻘﺎسﻧﺔ ﺑﯾﻧﻬﻣﺎ ,أﻣﺎ اﻟﺣﺎﻟﺔ اﻟﺛﺎﻧﯾﺔ ﻓﻘد ﺗﻡ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ ﺗطﺑﯾﻖ ﻧظﺎﻡ اﻟغﺎصات اﻟﻨظﯿﻔﺔ (FM-
) 200ﻟﻤكتب أداسة اﻟﻤﺴتﻮدع ﺑﺈﺳﺗﺧداﻡ ﺑسﻧﺎﻣﺞ ) . ( FM-200 calculation
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Content Page No
اآلية I
Dedication II
Acknowledgements III
Abstract IV
اﻟمستخﻠص V
Table of contents VI
Abbreviations XVIII
CHAPTE ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction 2
1.4. Scope 3
1.5. Methodology 3
CHAPTR TWO
FIRE SAFETY
2. 2. Definition of firefighting 5
vi
2. 3. Basics of a Fire 5
2. 5. Classifications of fire 6
vii
3.2.2.6. Gridded Sprinkler System 18
3.2.2.7. Looped Sprinkler System 18
3.2.2.8. Pre action Sprinkler System 18
3.2.2.9. Wet Pipe Sprinkler System 18
3.2.3 System Components 18
3.2.3.1. Branch Lines 18
3.2.3.2. Cross Mains 19
3.2.3.3. Feed Mains 19
3.2.3.4. Flexible Listed Pipe Coupling 19
3.2.3.5. System Riser 19
3.2.4. Classification of Sprinklers 19
3.2.4.1. Suppression Fast-Response (SFR) Sprinkler 19
3.2.4.2. Extended Coverage Sprinkler 19
3.2.4.3. Large Drop Sprinkler 20
3.2.4.4. Nozzles 20
3. 2.4.5. Old-Style/Conventional Sprinkler 20
3. 2.4.6. Open Sprinkler 20
3.2.4.7. Quick-Response Early Suppression (QRES) Sprinkler 20
3.2.4.8. Quick-Response Extended Coverage Sprinkler 20
3.2.4.9. Quick-Response (QR) Sprinkler 20
3.2.4.10. Residential Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.11 Special Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.12. Spray Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.13. Standard Spray Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.14. Concealed Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.15. Flush Sprinkler 21
viii
3.2.4.16. Pendent Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.17. Recessed Sprinkler 21
3.2.4.18 Sidewall Sprinkler 22
3.2.4.19. Upright Sprinkler 22
3.2.5. Classification of Occupancies 22
3.2.5.1. Light Hazard Occupancies 22
3.2.5.2. Ordinary Hazard Occupancies 22
3.2.5.3. Extra Hazard Occupancies 23
3.2.6. Position, Location, Spacing, and Use of Sprinklers 23
3.2.6.1. General 23
3.2.6.2. Protection Areas per Sprinkler 23
3.2.6.3. Sprinkler Spacing 24
3.2.7. Design Area 25
3.2.8. Hydraulic Calculation Procedures 25
3.2.8.1. General 25
3.2.8.2. Friction Loss Formula 26
3.2.8.3. Equivalent Pipe Lengths of Valves and Fittings 26
3.2.9. Schedule for Light Hazard Occupancies 27
3.2.10. Schedule for Ordinary Hazard Occupancies 27
3.3. FM-200 Agent 28
3.3.1. Definition 28
3.3.2. FM-200 Extinguishing Agent 28
3.3.2.1. Cleanliness 29
3.3.2.2. Physical Properties of FM-200 (HFC-227ea) 29
3.3.2.3. Fill Density 30
3.3.3. System Description 30
ix
3.3.3.1. Operating Pressure 32
3.3.3.2. Operating Temperature Range Limitations 32
3.3.4. Component Descriptions 32
3.3.4.1. FM-200 Cylinder/Valve Assemblies 32
3.3.4.2. Cylinder Mounting Bracket 33
3.3.4.3. Fire trace Flexible Detector/Actuation Tubing 33
3.3.4.4. Discharge Nozzles 34
3.3.4.5. Pressure Switch 34
3.3.4.6. Recharge Adapters, FM-200 Cylinder 35
3.3.4.7. Cylinder Nitrogen Recharge Adapter 35
3.3.4.8. Cylinder Hydrostatic Pressure Test Adapters 35
3.3.4.9. FM-200 Warning Nameplate 35
3.3.5. System Design and Limitation 36
3.3.5.1. General 36
3.3.5.2. Design Procedure 36
CHAPTR FOUR
CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1. Calculations of sprinkler system 39
4.1.1 Classification of Occupancies 39
4.1.2. Number of Sprinklers, and Spacing between Sprinklers 40
4.1.3. Area Coverage per Sprinkler (Asp) 41
4.1.4. Selection of the Sprinklers Network 41
4.1.5. Selection of the Pipes Diameters 41
4.1.6. Designing Area 42
4.1.7. Calculation of GPM and Pressure 42
4.1.8. Tank Capacity 48
x
4.1.9. Calculation 48
4.1.9.1 Calculation Results 54
CHAPTR FIVE
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1. Conclusion 56
5.2. Recommendation 63
REFERENCES 64
APPENDIX 65
xi
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
TABLE NO.
NO.
xii
Maximum Volume That Can Be Protected By 12 Lb.
3-12-c 39
Unit
3-13 Maximum Nozzle Limitation 39
3-14 Maximum Tubing and Fitting Limitation 40
4-1 Comparing between Analytical Results and
Simulation Results 56
4-2 Input Parameter 57
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
FIGURE
NO.
3-1 Area/Density Curves 22
xiv
4-16 Calculation Program of Plumbing and Firefighting
Calculations for CO2 Agent 60
4-17 Calculation Results for CO2 System 61
xv
ABBREVIATIONS
xvi
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1
1.1. Introduction
2
1.3. Purpose of the Thesis
Fire is the main hazard that is enough to cause a huge damage, so fire
safety is a system attends wide scope in engineering field. Fire safety could
be implemented by
• PREVENTION: Make sure fires don’t start
• PRECAUTIONS: Minimize the damage from fire
• PROCEDURES: Action to take in the event of fire
So a fire fighting system is to consider the mentioned aims very effectively.
For these considerations study of fighting system is very important. The
main objectives of this research are:
1.4. Scope
1.5. Methodology
3
CHAPTER TWO
Fire Safety
4
2.1. Definition of fire
Fire is rapid oxidation of a material in the exothermic chemical
process of combustion releasing heat , light , and various reaction products
slower oxidative processes like rusting or digestion are not included by this
definition.
2.2. Definition of firefighting
5
2.4. The Fire Triangle
Fire safety, at its most basic, is based upon the principle of keeping
fuel sources and ignition sources separate. Three things together produce the
chemical reaction that is fire. Take away any of these things and the fire will
be extinguished. These three things must be present at the same time to
produce fire:
2.5.Classification of Fire
Class A: Wood, paper, cloth, trash, plastics—solids that are not metals.
Class B: Flammable liquids—gasoline, oil, grease, acetone. Includes
flammable gases.
6
Table ( 2-1 ) fire classification
7
2.7. Firefighting system classification
2.7.1. Water system
Sprinkler system
Hazel system
Fire hydrant system
2.7.2. Gas system
Fire Extinguisher
FM-200, CO2, FE-13
2.8. Types of Fire Extinguishers
Different types of fire extinguishers are designed to fight different
classes of fire. The 3 most common types of fire extinguishers are:
8
Figure (2.2) Types of Fire Extinguishers
• Extinguish fire by taking away the ―heat‖ element of the Fire Triangle.
• Designed for Class A fires only: wood, paper, cloth. Using water on a
flammable liquid fire could cause the fire to spread. Using water on an
electrical fire increases the risk of electrocution. If there have no choice but
9
to use an APW on an electrical fire, electrical equipment must be un-
plugged or de-energized.
• Their cylinders are red. They range in size from 5 lbs to 100 lbs or larger.
On larger sizes, the horn will be at the end of a long, flexible hose.
• They are designed for Class B and C (Flammable Liquids and Electrical
Sources) fires only.
• Very cold as it comes out of the extinguisher, so it cools the fuel as well.
• Ineffective in extinguishing a Class A fire because it may not be able to
displace enough oxygen to successfully put the fire out. Class A materials
may also smolder and re-ignite.
•
10
2.8.3. Dry Chemical (ABC) Fire Extinguishers
Dry chemical extinguishers calls (ABC) fire extinguishers depending
on class A, B and C of fire. They put out fire by coating the fuel with a thin
layer of dust. This separates the fuel from the oxygen in the air. The powder
also works to interrupt the chemical reaction of fire. These extinguishers are
very effective at putting out fire. ABC extinguishers are red. On campus,
they range in size from 5 to 20 lbs. ABC fire extinguishers are filled with a
fine yellow/white powder. The greatest portion of this powder is composed
of mono ammonium phosphate. the extinguishers are pressurized with
nitrogen. Dry chemical extinguishers come in a variety of types; DC (for
―Dry Chemical‖), ABC (can be used on Class A, B, or C fires) and BC
(designed for use on Class B and C fires). It is extremely important to
identify which types of dry chemical extinguishers are located in the design
area; An ―ABC‖ extinguisher will have a label, indicating it may be used on
Class A, B and C fires. Dry chemical extinguishers with powder designed
for Class B and C fires (―BC‖ extinguishers) may be located in places such
as commercial kitchens and areas with flammable liquids. On campus,
ABC’s can be found in public hallways of new buildings, in laboratories,
break rooms, offices, chemical storage areas, mechanical rooms, University
vehicles, etc [3].
2.8.4. Foam fire extinguishers
Foam fire extinguishers or (AFFF fire extinguishers) are more
versatile than water and are lighter in weight compared with water
equivalents delivering similar suppressant performance Foam fire
extinguishers can be used for class A&B fires but are not recommended for
fires involving electricity unless the electrical current can be disconnected
11
first. Foam fire extinguishers are colour coded with a cream label. A Foam
fire extinguishers discharges a foam solution under pressure that forms a
blank or film on the surface of a burning liquid creating a barrier between
the fire vapours and the air necessary to support combustion thereby
smothering the fire. [5 ]
2.8.5. Dry powder fire extinguishers
Dry powder fire extinguishers are similar to dry chemical except that
they extinguish the fire by separating the fuel from the oxygen element or by
removing the heat element of the fire triangle.
However, dry powder extinguishers are for class D or combustible metal
fires , only they are ineffective on all other classes of fires. [ 25]
2.9. Literature Review
There are so many studies in firefighting, some engineers designed
samples of firefighting systems.
In 2006 model of sprinkler system was designed by engineer Tamer A.
Ghbai, a wet riser sprinkler selected using tree network to complete design
including the hydraulic calculation that required to the sprinkler network [1]
12
CHAPTER THREE
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
&
FM-200AGENT SYSTEM
13
3. sprinkler system
3.1. Background
3.2. SprinklerSystem
14
13), Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems, was prepared by the
technical committee on hanging and bracing of water-based fire protection
systems, the technical committee on sprinkler system discharge criteria, and
the technical committee on sprinkler system installation criteria, released by
the technical correlating committee on automatic sprinkler systems, and
acted on by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc., at its May
meeting held May 17-20, 1999, in Baltimore. It was issued by the standards
council on July 22, 1999, with an effective date of August 13, 1999 [4].
15
The antifreeze solution is discharged, followed by water, immediately
upon operation of sprinklers opened by heat from afire.
16
When this valve opens, water flows into the piping system and
discharges from all sprinklers attachedthereto.
3.2.2.5 Dry Pipe SprinklerSystem
17
3.2.2.9 Wet Pipe SprinklerSystem
The pipes in which the sprinklers are placed, either directly or through
risers.
The pipes supplying the branch lines, either directly or through risers.
3.2.3.3. Feed Mains
The aboveground horizontal or vertical pipe between the water supply and
the mains (cross or feed) that contains a control valve (either directly or
within its supply pipe) and a water flow alarm device.
18
3.2.4. Classification of Sprinklers
3.2.4.4. Nozzles
19
3.2.4.7. Quick-Response Early Suppression (QRES)Sprinkler
A type of sprinkler listed for its capability to provide fire control for a wide
range of fire hazards.
A sprinkler in which all or part of the body, including the shank thread, is
mounted above the lower plane of the ceiling.
A sprinkler in which all or part of the body, other than the shank thread, is
mounted within a recessed housing.
21
3.2.5.1.Light Hazard Occupancies
22
3.2.6.Position, Location, Spacing, and Use of Sprinklers
3.2.6.1.General
23
Where:
3.2.6.3.Sprinkler Spacing
The distance from sprinklers to walls shall not exceed one-half of the
allowable maximum distance between sprinklers. The distance from the wall
to the sprinkler shall be measured perpendicular to the wall.
24
3.2.6.3.3. Minimum Distance from Walls
3.2.7.Design Area
The water supply for sprinklers only shall be determined either from the
area/density curves of Figure (3-1) where area/density criteria is specified
for special occupancy hazards.
When using Figure (3-1), the calculations shall satisfy any single
point on the appropriate area/density curve.
3.2.8.1.General
A calculated system for a building, or a calculated addition to a system in an
existing sprinklered building, shall supersede the rules in this standard
governing pipe schedules, except that all systems shall continue to be
limited by area and pipe sizes shall be no less than 1 in. (25.4 mm) nominal
for ferrous piping and 3/4 in. (19 mm) nominal for copper tubing or
nonmetallic piping listed for fire sprinkler service.
25
The size of pipe, number of sprinklers per branch line, and number of
branch lines per cross main shall otherwise be limited only by the available
water supply.
However, sprinkler spacing and all other rules covered in this and
other applicable standards shall be observed.
Pipe friction losses shall be determined on the basis of the Hazen- Williams
formula, as follows:
Where
Q = flow in gpm
Table (3-3) shall be used to determine the equivalent length of pipe for
fittings and devices unless manufacturer’s test data indicate that other
factorsareappropriate.Forsaddle-typefittingshavingfrictionlossgreater
thanthatshowninTable(3-3),theincreasedfrictionlossshallbeincluded in
hydraulic calculations. For internal pipe diameters different from Schedule
40 steel pipe, the equivalent feet shown in the table shall be multiplied by a
factor derived from the followingformula:
(Actual inside diameter/Schedule 40 steel pipe inside diameter)=Factor
26
3.2.9. Schedule for Light Hazard Occupancies
Branch lines shall not exceed eight sprinklers on either side of a cross main.
Exception: Where more than eight sprinklers on a branch line are necessary,
lines shall be permitted to be increased to nine sprinklers by making the two
end lengths 1 in. (25.4 mm) and 11/4 in. (33 mm), respectively, and the sizes
thereafter standard.
Ten sprinklers shall be permitted to be placed on a branch line,
making the two end lengths 1 in. (25.4 mm) and 11/4 in. (33 mm),
respectively, and feeding the tenth sprinkler by a 21/2-in. (64-mm) pipe.
Pipe sizes shall be in accordance with Table (3-4).
Each area requiring more sprinklers than the number
specifiedfor31/2-in.(89-mm) pipe in table(3-4)and without subdividing
partitions (not necessarily fire walls) shall be supplied by mains or risers
sized for ordinary hazard occupancies.
Branch lines shall not exceed eight sprinklers on either side of a cross main.
Exception: Where more than eight sprinklers on a branch line are
necessary, lines shall be permitted to be increased to nine sprinklers by
making the two end lengths 1 in. (25.4 mm) and 11/4 in. (33 mm),
respectively, and the sizes thereafter standard. Ten sprinklers shall be
permitted to be placed on a branch line, making the two end lengths 1 in.
(25.4 mm) and 11/4 in. (33 mm), respectively, and feeding the tenth
sprinkler by a 21/2-in. (64-mm) pipe.
Pipe sizes shall be in accordance withTable (3-5). Where the distance
between sprinklersonthebranchline exceeds 12 ft (3.7 m) or the distance
27
between the branch lines exceeds 12 ft (3.7 m), the number of sprinklers for
a given pipe size shall be in accordance with Table (3.5 ).
3.3.1. Definition
28
3.3.2.1. Cleanliness
FM-200 is clean and leaves no residue, thereby minimizing after fire
clean up, along with keeping expensive downtime to a minimum. Most
materials such as steel ,aluminum, stainless steel ,brass ,as well as plastics,
rubber and electronic components are not affected by exposure to FM-
200. This agent is also environmentally friendly, having an ozone depletion
potential (ODP) of 0.00.
77oF
29
• And Ozone Depletion Potential 0.00
Each Fire trace FM-200 storage cylinder has been designed for a maximum
fill density as shown in Table 3-2, and super- pressurized with nitrogen to
150 psig +10, -0 psig at 70oF (10.4 bars gage + 0.7, -0 bars gage at 21oC).
3.3.3.System Description
The Fire trace FM-200 Automatic Indirect units are available in 3 sizes,
namely:
• Model ILP 300: Charged with 3.0 Lbs. ofFM-200
30
• Model ILP 1200: Charged with 12.0 Lbs. of FM-200
These units are designed for use in Total Flooding applications only, where
the hazard is normally unoccupied.
The Fire trace indirect units can be used, but are not limited, to
protect; electrical and electronic cabinets, telecommunication areas, data
Processing areas and cabinets, other high value assets, laboratory fume
/exhaust cabinets, pump enclosures, UPS units, flammable chemicals storage
cabinets, generator enclosures, transformer cabinets, computer/data storage
cabinets, CNC & VMC Machining centers, and many other applications.
FM-200 is a gaseous fire-extinguishing agent that is effective for use
on class A – surface type fires, class B – flammable liquid fires, and class C
– electrical equipment fires .
FM-200 should not be used where pyrotechnic chemicals containing
their own oxygen supply, reactive metals such as lithium, sodium,
potassium, magnesium, titanium, zirconium, uranium and plutonium, metal
hydrides, or chemicals capable of undergoing auto thermal decomposition,
such as certain fire trace FM-200 Automatic Indirect units consists of ; FM-
200 Cylinder/Valve assembly, cylinder mounting Bracket, fire trace
detector/actuation tubing and fittings (no substitute), discharge nozzles,
pressure switch, and discharge tubing and fittings (furnished by others).
Once installed, the Fire trace Automatic Unit becomes a self- contained,
self-actuating unit that does not require an external source of power or
electricity.
The unit utilizes unique Fire trace flexible tubing that is attached to
the top of the cylinder valve. This tubing is pressurized with dry nitrogen to
maintain the cylinder valve in the closed position. This tubing is temperature
31
sensitive, and acts as a continuous linear thermal detector that ruptures at
70oF.
The ambient operating temperature range for all unit components is: 0 oF to
32
Each cylinder is equipped with a brass valve, a pressure gauge to monitor
cylinder pressure ,and a quarter turn ball valve that interfaces with the Fire
trace detector tubing. The ball valve must be kept closed at all times when
the cylinder is not in service. In addition, the 6 and 12Lb size cylinder valves
valve is equipped with a pressure relief (rupture disc) device in compliance
with DOT requirements.
Each valve is also equipped with (2) discharge outlet ports. Each
outlet port is provided with a safety plug that must be installed in the
discharge outlet whenever a cylinder is not in service.
These plugs are safety devices designed to prevent uncontrolled
discharge of the cylinder in the event that the valve is accidentally actuated.
Table (3-6) describes the 3, 6, and 12 LB cylinder assemblies.
Each cylinder is equipped with a straight siphon tube and can only be
mounted in a vertical (upright)position.
The Fire trace FM-200 units are designed for an operating
temperature range of 0oF to +130oF. Table (3.8) shows the cylinder gauge,
pressure-temperature relationship based on a maximum fill density of 75
33
3.3.4.3 .Fire trace Flexible Detector/Actuation Tubing
to rupture at any point along the tube when the temperature reaches 212oF
(100oC).
The rupture of the tube releases the nitrogen pressure causing the FM-
200 cylinder valve to actuate, resulting in complete discharge of the FM-200
agent through the nozzles.
The small nozzle is for use with the 3 Lb. size unit only.
The medium size nozzle is for use with the 6 Lb. and 12 Lb size units.
34
the top of the hazard in the center of the area being protected. The nozzles
are brass with female NPT pipe threads.
The recharge adapter is installed in one of the cylinder valve discharge ports
during the cylinder recharging procedure.
The adapter is used for refilling the cylinder with FM-200 agent.
The recharge adapter is connected to a fire trace tubing, and the other end of
the tubing is attached to the ball valve, located on top of the cylinder valve,
during the charging procedure.
35
3.3.4.8. Cylinder Hydrostatic Pressure Test Adapters
These adapters are available for use when a cylinder hydrostatic test is
required in order to comply with DOT regulations.
The warning plate is required to warn personnel not to enter the hazard area
during or after discharge.
3.3.5.1. General
The fire trace series of FM-200 Agent pre-engineered automatic indirect
units were tested and limits established by fire trace. Units are listed by
Underwriters Laboratories Inc and Underwriters’ Laboratories of Canada,
and approved by Factory Mutual Research Corp.
These units were subjected to numerous performance and fire tests in
order to verify their suitability and to establish design limitations for, hazard
volume, nozzle area coverage and heights, nozzle placement, discharge time
and flow rates, design concentrations & design factors, and Detector tubing
placement.
3.3.5.2. Design Procedure
The procedures should be used to design a fire trace model ILP FM-
200 pre-engineered automatic unit are conduct a survey and analysis of the
36
hazard to be protected and determine the height, length, and width of the
enclosure.
37
CHAPTER FOUR
CALCULATIONS AND ANALYSIS
38
4.1. Calculation of sprinkler system
39
4.1.2. Number of Sprinklers, and Spacing between Sprinklers
No. of Sprinkler = Area / Area coverage per Sprinkler
Area=01 *20 = 200 m2
For ordinary hazard, maximum area coverage per Sprinkler = 12.1 m2 from
table (3-1).
Number of Sprinklers = 200/12.1 ≈ 16
Maximum spacing between sprinkler 15 ft (4.56 m), from table (3.2.a), and
the distance from sprinklers to walls shall not exceed one-half of the
allowable distance between sprinkler. For these considerations and for
distribute the sprinklers to be consentient with the surface area let the
number of sprinklers 20.
40
4.1.3. Area Coverage Per Sprinkler (Asp)
Asp = 4*2.50 = 10 m2
Using table (3-2-a), this value is acceptable ( Less than maximum spacing
130 ft2).
4.1.4. Selection of the Sprinklers Network:
Tree network system can be used for this case, the design calculations using
this way is not complex.
41
Figure (4-5): Selected Diameters of Pipes
Where:
Pst = Pressure at the Farther Sprinkler Head (psi).
k = Nozzle Factor, For standard sprinkler heads the value of nozzle factor is
5.65
Pst = (Qst/k)2
Pst = (21.52/5.65)2 = 14.50 psi
44
P2 = P1 + Pdrop12 = 14.50 + 1.67 = 16.17 psi
Q2 = 5.65 * √ P2 = 5.65 * √16.17 = 22.72 gpm
4.1.7.4. Calculation of Pressure and (gpm) at point A
QA = Q1 + Q2 = 21.52 + 22.72 = 44.24 gpm
= (real length between 2 and A) + 2 (900 long turn elbow with 1
pipe diameter)
Leq2A = 1.25*3.28 + 2 = 6.1 ft
P2A = (4.52*Q1.85)/(C1.85*d4.87)
P2A = (4.52*44.24.85 )/ (1201.85 * 1.0494.87 ) = 0.57 psi
Pdrop2A = P2A * Lequ2A = 0.57 * 6.1 = 3.45 psi
PA = Pdrop2A + P2 = 3.45 + 16.17 = 19.64 psi
4.1.7.5. Calculation of Pressure and (gpm) at point B
PB = PA + PdropAB
PdropAB = PAB * LequAB
LequAB = Length between A and B = 4*3.28 = 13.12 ft
PAB = (4.52*44.241.85 )/ (1201.85 * 1.384.87 ) = 0.149 psi/ft
PdropAB = PAB * LequAB = 0.149 * 13.12 = 1.95 psi
PB = PdropAB + PA = 1.95 + 19.62 = 21.57 psi
In the same way QB = QC = QD = QA because branch lines are
similar, but friction losses between these points must be consider, so gpm at
these points can be calculate using following equation:
QNew = Q * √(PNew / P) …………. (4.4)
QB = 44.24 * √ ( 21.57 / 19.62) = 46.39 gpm
4.1.7.6. Calculation of Pressure and (gpm) at point C
QBC = QB + QA = 44.24 + 46.39 = 90.63 gpm
At Qc = 44.24 gpm and Pc = 19.62 psi
45
PdropBC = PBC * LequBC
PBC = (4.52*90.631.85 )/ (1201.85 * 1.614.87 ) = 0.26 psi/ft
LequBC = Length between C and B = 4*3.28 = 13.12 ft
PdropBC = 0.26 * 13.12 = 3.47 psi
PC = PB + PdropBC = 21.57 + 3.47 = 25 psi
QC = 44.24 * √ ( 25 / 17.17) = 49.94 gpm
4.1.7.7. Calculation of Pressure and (gpm) at point D
QCD = QC + QBC = 49.94 + 90.63 = 140.57 gpm
PdropCD = PCD * LequCD
PCD = (4.52*140.571.85 )/ (1201.85 * 2.0674.87 ) = 0.18 psi/ft
LequCD = Length between C and D = 4*3.28 = 13.12 ft
PdropCD = 0.18 * 13.12 = 2.36psi
PD = PC + PdropCD = 25 + 2.36 = 27.36 psi
QD = 44.24 * √ ( 27.36 / 19.62) = 52.24 gpm
Total GPM at the right side of design area = QD + QCD
Qtotal RIGHT = QD + QCD = 52.24 + 140.57 = 192.18 gpm
Total GPM = Qtotal RIGHT * 2 = 192.18 * 2 = 385.62 gpm
4.1.7.8. Calculation of Pressure at point E
LeqDE = 5*3.28 + 3 (from the table , 900 long turn elbow and 2" tube) =
19.4 ft
PdropDE = PDE * LeqDE
PDE = (4.52*192.811.85 )/ (1201.85 * 2.0674.87 ) = 0.32 psi/ft
PdropDE = 0.32 * 19.4 = 6.14 psi
PE = PD + PdropDE = 27.36 + 6.14 = 33.5 psi
4.1.7.9. Calculation of Pressure at point F
PF = PE + PdropEF
46
LeqEF = 4.555 *3.28 + 10 (Tee flow turned 900 and 2" tube)
LeqEF = 24.94 ft
PEF = (4.52*192.811.85 )/ (1201.85 * 2.0674.87 ) = 0.32psi/ft
PdropEF = 0.32 * 24.94 = 7.90 psi
This value is not acceptable, Pdrop must be less than 7 psi. So pipe
diameter can be change to be 2.5".
PEF = (4.52*192.811.85 )/ (1201.85 * 2.4694.87 ) = 0.13psi/ft
LeqEF = 4.555 *3.28 + 12 (Tee flow turned 900 and 2.5" tube)
LeqEF = 26.94 ft
PdropEF = 0.13 * 26.94 = 3.50 psi (acceptable value)
PF = PE + PdropEF = 33.5 + 3.50 = 37 psi
4.1.7.10. Calculation of Pressure at point G
PG = PF + PdropFG + Pelevation
Pressure Drop by Elevation = H / 10.28
Where: H is the head (meter)
Pelevation = H / 10.28 = 6 /10.28 = 0.58 bar
Pelevation = 0.31 * 14.5 = 4.5 psi
PFG = (4.52*385.621.85 )/ (1201.85 * 2.4694.87 ) = 0.48 psi/ft
The pipe from the out let of the pump (point G) to the point F include;
one 900 standard elbow, and one butter fly valve, with 2.5" pipe diameter.
Real length between F and G = 6m + 2m (length of the main riser)
Real length between F and G = (6 + 2) * 3.28 = 26.24 ft
LeqFG = 26.24 + 6 +7 = 30.06 ft
PdropFG = PFG * LeqFG = 0.48 * 30.06 = 14.43 psi (not acceptable)
Using 3" pipe diameter:
PFG = (4.52*385.621.85 )/ (1201.85 * 3.0684.87 ) = 0.17 psi/ft
LeqFG = 26.24 + 7 + 10 = 43.24 ft
47
PdropFG = 0.17 * 43.24 = 7.35 psi (acceptable value)
PG = PF + PdropFG + Pelevation = 37 + 7.35 + 4.5 = 48.85 psi
Ppump = 48.85 / 14.5 = 3.37 bar
Qpump = 385.62 * 3.78 = 1457.64 L/min
New values of diameters after the design can be shown in the following
figure:
48
Figure ( 4-8 ): General Project Data
49
Figure 4-9. Edit Pipe Data
50
Figure ( 4-10 ): Edit Pipe Node Data
51
Figure ( 4-11 ): Edit Pipe Node Data
52
4.1.9.1 Calculation Results
53
4.2.3 Calculation Results
The results of the simulation is shown in figure (4-14), when the simulation
program of plumbing and firefighting calculations used. Let the number of
nozzles 4.
54
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLU SION AND RECOMMENDATION
55
5.1. Conclusion
This thesis described the appropriate implementation of the
firefighting system design parameters using the standards from the NFPA
(National Fire Protection Association). In this thesis different two cases
selected to apply the accurate design.
First case was storage building for clothes , for this case a complete design
of the sprinkler system was done which included; selection of the
sprinklers network, selection of the pipes materials and diameters,
calculation of GPM and pressure and the tank size.
The program of Elite for firefighting calculation software is used to
calculate the mentioned parameters beside the analytical calculation, there
are few different between the results in the two ways of calculation for
differed fuzziness in each way. Second case was office contain electirical
devices, for this case designs of FM-200 Agent System ware done using
the simulation program of plumbing and firefighting calculations, each
design included total weight and number of cylinders required..
56
5.2. Recommendation
From the results it recommended that
From the results obtained by using NFPA in this work we
recommend ate to use BS&ISO standard .
Use firefighting system in storage building and work shop .
Confidence firefighting system in service building .
57
Reference
[1] F. E. M. A. U.S. Fire Administration. (2011, 17-6). U.S. fire
statistics. Available: http://www.usfa.fema.gov/data/statistics/
[2] P. F. OvidiuVermesan, Internet of Things: Converging
Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems,
2013.
[3] D. Bandyopadhyay and J. Sen, "Internet of things: Applications
and challenges in technology and standardization," Wireless
Personal Communications, 2011.
[4] M. Ahrens. (2009, 12-5). experience with smoke alarms and
other
fire detection/alarm equipment. National Fire Protection
Association. Available:
www.vahealth.org/Injury/getalarmedva/documents/2009/pdf/
[5] C. m. a. H. Corporation. (2011, 12 May). Carbon monoxide.
Available: www.cmhcschl.
gc.ca/en/co/maho/yohoyohe/inaiqu/inaiqu_002.cfm
[6] A. F. Enterprises. (2008, 17 June). Detect fire at its source.
Available: www.austfire.com.au/dtec.php
[7] E. J. a. V. Spector, "Flame And Gas Detection In Petrochemical
Industry," presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, 1997.
[8] G. Monitors. (2013, 27 June). Combustible Gas Safety
Monitoring. Available:
[9] V. R. a. B. Palaniappan, "Embedded system for Hazardous Gas
detection
58
and Alerting," International Journal of Distributed and Parallel
Systems
(IJDPS), vol. 3, 2012.
[10] R. Kamal, Embedded System Architecture Programming and
Design: Tata McGraw-Hill, 2003.
[11] Arduino. (2014, 21 April). Arduino introduction. Available:
https://www.arduino.cc/en/guide/introduction
[12] M. Labs. (2015). MediaTek LinkIt™ ONE Developer's Guide.
[13] A. Ashraf, "DC Motor Speed Control via Fuzzy / pole
placement /
Pi Controller," Master, Department of Electrical Engineering,
Hogskolan Darlana, 2010.
[14] G. S. University. (2013, 20 july). DC Motor Operation.
Available:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/motdc.html
[15] (2014). An Introduction to Wi-Fi.
[16] K. Pripužić, H. Belani, and M. Vuković, "Early Forest Fire
Detection with Sensor Networks: Sliding Window Skylines
Approach," in Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and
Engineering Systems. vol. 5177, I. Lovrek, R. Howlett, and L.
Jain, Eds., ed: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 725-732.
[17] H. Y. T. Chen, G. Su and W. Fan, "An automatic fire searching
and suppression system for large spaces," Fire Safety Journal, vol.
39, 2004.
[18] M. A. H. Mehmood, A. Tauseef and A. Sikandar, "8051/
AT89S52
based SMOKE DETECTOR and FIRE ALARM SYSTEM,"
59
National University of Science and Technology, 2013.
References
65
[19] F. j. O. D. Pozo, and L. Alados-Arboledas, "Fire Detection and
Growth Monitoring a Multi temporal Technique on AVHRR Mid-
Infrared and Thermal Channels," Remote Sensing of Environment,
vol. 60, 1997.
[20] E. Obi, "Optimization of flame and gas detectors," Master,
Faculty
of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 2014.
[21] L. Fraiwan, K. Lweesy, A. Bani-Salma, and N. Mani, "A
wireless
home safety gas leakage detection system," in Biomedical
Engineering (MECBME), 2011 1st Middle East Conference on,
2011, pp. 11-14.
[22] T. S. S.RAJITHA " A security Alert System Using Gsm For
Gas
Leakage," International Journal of VLSI and Embedded System,
vol. 03, 2012.
[23] Fire-fighting Guidance Notes_e-Feb15.pdf
[24] Fire Services Handbook
60
[26] REVIT_Walkthrough_getting-Started.pdf
61
APPENDICES
62
Figure 3-1. Area/Density Curves.
64
Table 3-1: Protection Area Limitation per Sprinkler
protection Area Limitation per Sprinkler
calculated with
density ≥ 0.25
All Hydraulically 130 12.1 15
calculated with
density above 0.25
65
Table 3-3: Equivalent Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Length
Fittings and Fittings and Valves Expressed in Equivalent Feet of Pipe
Valves
1/2" 3/4" 1" 11/4" 11/2" 2" 21/2" 3" 31/2" 4" 5" 6" 8" 10"
400 Elbow 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 7 9 11
900 Standard 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14 18 22
0 0.5 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 8 9 13 16
90 Long
Elbow
TurnorElbow
Tee Cross 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 17 20 25 30 35 50
Butterfly . . . . . 6 7 `10 . 12 9 10 12 19
Gate valve
Valve . . . . . 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 5
Swing check . . 5 7 9 11 14 16 19 22 27 32 45 55
66
Table 3-5. Ordinary Hazard Pipe Schedule
ft3 m3
3 100300 3.0 7.62 16.2 41.15 71 1163 3 1.36 73 1169
6 100600 4.25 10.8 17.7 44.96 149 2441 6 2.72 70 1121
67
Table 3-8: The Cylinder Gauge, Pressure-Temperature Relationship
Cylinder Pressure
Temperature Pressure
0F 0C psig kpa
0 -17.8 91 672
10 -12.2 97 689
20 -6.7 104 717
30 -1.1 111 765
40 4.4 119 820
50 10.0 128 882
60 15.5 139 958
70 21.1 150 1034
68
Table 3-10-a: The Minimum Safety Factor Required for the Hazard
Hazard Type Minimum Safety Factor
69
Table 3-11: Total Flooding Quantity
70
Table 3-12-a: Maximum Volume That Can Be Protected By 3 Lb.
Unit
71
Table 3-12-b: Maximum Volume That Can Be Protected By 6 Lb.
Unit
72
Table 3-12-c: Maximum Volume That Can Be Protected By 12 Lb.
Unit
73
Table 3-13: Maximum Nozzle Limitation
74