Chapter 1: The Ricardian model of international trade

Chapter 1: The Ricardian model of

international trade

Learning objectives
On completion of this chapter and having done the relevant readings and
activities, you should be able to:
 +  
the idea of absolute advantage
 + % 
is the determinant of the pattern of trade and specialisation in the
Ricardian model
 + 
 +%
relative wages
 @X\@^ %<%
in the Ricardian model
 +  %
world situation.

Essential reading
Krugman, P. and M. Obstfeld International Economics: Theory and Policy.
(Boston, Mass.; London: Addison–Wesley, 2009) Chapter 3 ‘Labour
Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model’.
Suranovic, S.M. International Trade: Theory and Policy. Chapter 40
http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch40/Tch40.php

Further reading
Krugman, P. (1996) ‘Ricardo’s difficult idea’; paper for a conference. Available
at: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm
Krugman, P. (1995) ‘Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences’,
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity pp.327–77.

Introduction
International trade theory seeks to explain or answer some of the
following questions:
 =
  =
 +=
 +=
 >% 
productivity ones?
 >=
 > %=
Quite deep and interesting answers to most of these questions are offered
by one of the genuine insights of economic theory, namely the principle of
comparative advantage.
13
16 International economics

The Ricardian model

Developed by David Ricardo in the early nineteenth century to provide
intellectual support for the abolition of Corn Laws in Great Britain – that
is, to promote the benefits of free trade (in grain) – the principle of
comparative advantage remains one of the enduring insights of economic
theory. Many textbooks continue to use Ricardo’s original numerical
example. The example uses two countries, Portugal and England, and the
production and trade of two products, namely wine and cloth. It is used
to show the mutual gains from trade (and specialisation) which arise
even when one of the countries is more efficient in the production of both
goods.
The further development of Ricardo’s numerical example as a two-good/
two-country model has come to be known as the Ricardian model, also
known as the classical model. The Ricardian model remains the starting
point of the theory of international trade theory even now, nearly 200
years after Ricardo originally developed it.
The basis for comparative advantage in the Ricardian model, which
drives the pattern of specialisation and trade lies in cross-country
technological differences, as summarised by differences in the
opportunity cost of the production of goods.

What is good about the Ricardian model?

Here are some of the advantages of the model:
 
advantage and how trade and specialisation according to comparative
advantage will generate mutual gains from trade
  
generate a trade and specialisation pattern in accordance with
comparative advantage
   
international competitiveness
   
development of many other propositions in trade theory
 " + a simple general equilibrium model.

Techniques and some formal results

The usual assumptions of the Ricardian model may be summarised as
follows:
1. There are two countries, which we shall refer to as Home (H) and
Foreign (F).
2. There are two goods, say wine (w) and cheese (c).
3. Each good is produced with the aid of one factor of production, usually
thought of as labour. (You might imagine that labour actually works
with land and/or capital but these other factors are suppressed in this
model and formally you can assume that one unit of labour works with
a fixed bundle of other inputs.)
4. Production of both goods is subject to constant returns to scale
and hence the technology for each good may be summed up by its
unit labour requirement. The unit labour requirement in wine
is given by the number of units (hours) of labour needed to produce
14
 Chapter 1: The Ricardian model of international trade

one unit of output (i.e. a litre of wine). In cheese production, it is

the amount of labour needed to produce a kilogram of cheese. The
inverse of the unit labour requirement is the average (and marginal)
product of labour.
5. All markets are assumed to be competitive. This means that all markets
clear (i.e. supply = demand) and that, in both sectors, price = average
cost = marginal cost.

Note
It is not necessary for you to reproduce these assumptions in an essay or
in an examination answer unless they are specifically asked for, but you
should understand why the assumptions are needed.
You may find it helpful to approach the main properties and results of the
model in two alternative but complementary ways.

Equilibrium under autarky and the free trade equilibrium

One route is to assume that initially there is no trade between Home and
Foreign (perhaps because transport costs are prohibitively high). This is
known as autarky (i.e. both countries are self-sufficient in both goods and
consume what they produce). Thus, under autarky, each country can be
regarded as a closed economy and hence equilibrium in each is simply the
closed economy equilibrium.
With two goods, constant returns to scale and one factor of production,
production possibilities (PPF) can be depicted as a straight line. The area
below the production possibility curve in each country represents feasible
production of that country. The slope of the PPF reflects the opportunity
cost of cheese in terms of wine and in equilibrium also the autarky
relative price of cheese in terms of wine. (Here we assume that in the
autarky equilibrium cheese and wine are both produced and consumed.)
The coincidence of the price ratio and the opportunity cost ratio follows
from the fact that in competitive equilibrium prices must equal costs.
Autarky equilibrium in Foreign can also be represented in this way with
the difference being that the slope of the production possibility frontier/
relative price line will be different if relative costs are different from what
they are in Home.

Activity
Check for yourself that in equilibrium the price ratio = the cost ratio. (Hint: for each goods
price note that price = cost, and cost = labour requirement x wage rate.)

Let us assume for the sake of argument that Home has a higher
opportunity cost of cheese in terms of wine, relative to Foreign. That is,
more wine needs to be sacrificed in Home to produce one more unit of
cheese, than in Foreign. This is reflected in Figures 1.1 and 1.2, where
Home’s PPF is drawn steeper than the PPF of Foreign. Hence cheese is
more expensive in the Home autarky equilibrium than it is in Foreign.
The autarky equilibrium in Home and Foreign is denoted by A and A' in
Figures 1.1 and 1.2, respectively, where consumers choose consumption
to maximise utility (indifference curves IA), given the range of feasible
production possibilities. Hence the PPF is also the consumers’ budget set
in the autarky equilibrium. Note that the consumption side of these two
economies is assumed to be identical; that is, consumers in Home and
Foreign have the same preferences over wine and cheese.

15
16 International economics

Wine

B

C International Relative Prices

A
IFT
Opportunity Cost and
Autarky Relative Prices IA
(PC/PW)FT
(PC/PW)H
PPF CPF
Cheese
0

Figure 1.1: Autarky and free trade equilibrium in Home

Wine

CPF

PPF

C' International Relative Prices

A'

IFT
Opportunity Cost and IA
Autarky Relative Prices (PC/PW)FT

(PC/PW)F

Cheese
0 B'

Figure 1.2: Autarky and free trade equilibrium in Foreign

Suppose that trade between Home and Foreign becomes possible (because
of, say, a transport revolution that slashes international transport costs).
Economic agents observe that cheese is relatively cheap in Foreign but
wine is relatively cheap in Home, so Home buyers will switch to Foreign
as their source for cheese and Foreign consumers (realistically specialised
importers who are not modelled here) will switch to Home for wine.
This will have two effects:
1. The demand switch will tend to lower the relative price of cheese at
Home and the relative price of wine in Foreign. Clearly relative prices
in the two countries will tend to converge and given free trade and
negligible transport costs, there will be just one unified international
relative price. (Transport costs can be rather important for some
internationally traded goods and, of course, shipping and other forms
of international transport are important sectors in their own right.
However, incorporation of transport costs into trade models creates
much complexity without changing the basic results. Because of this,
transport costs are conventionally assumed to be zero in trade models.)
2. These price developments will cause Home to specialise in wine
production and Foreign in cheese production and exchange goods
in order to consume a mix of the two. It is the ability to separate
production and consumption through trade that generates gains in the
Ricardian model.

16
 Chapter 1: The Ricardian model of international trade

Specialisation in Home and Foreign is depicted by production points B and

B' in Figures 1.1 and 1.2, respectively. Home can export wine in exchange
for cheese at world prices, reflected by the shallower dotted relative price
line in Figure 1.1. This Consumption Possibilities Frontier (CPF) reflects
consumers’ budget line under free trade, which is now higher than the
PPF. Similarly, the higher relative price for cheese in Foreign resulting from
free trade expands consumers’ consumption possibilities, as reflected by
the CPF. Consumers in each economy maximise their utility given their
consumption possibilities so consumption under free trade is at C and C',
respectively.

The gains from trade

In Ricardo’s numerical example the gains from trade are established by
showing that if specialisation is according to comparative advantage, the
total world production of both goods can be greater than under autarky.
Thus both countries can be made better off. More generally, it can be
shown that free trade, and hence specialisation according to comparative
advantage, will expand consumption possibilities in both countries. This
is shown in Figure 1.3, which is constructed by combining Figures 1.1
and 1.2.

Cheese
0

A'

Foreign

C
(PC/PW)F
Wine
A

Home (PC/PW)FT
(PC/PW)H
International Relative Prices

Figure 1.3: The gains from trade

The dimensions of the box in Figure 1.3 show total world production
of wine and cheese when both countries are specialised according to
comparative advantage. Under autarky, consumption must be identical
with production in both countries. Hence Home consumption (and
production) would occur at a point like A and Foreign production and
consumption would be at a point like A'. When free trade is possible, both
will specialise and be able to trade at international prices (the arrowed
line in Figure 1.3). Thus a consumption point such as C is attainable. The
consumption point C is clearly superior to both A and A'. This is because
at C Home consumers can consume more of both goods than at point A
and Foreign consumers can consume more of both goods than at A'.
The gains from trade are also reflected in Figures 1.1 and 1.2 directly, as
consumers are able to reach a higher indifference curve (and thus welfare
level) than under free trade.

17
16 International economics

Relative Supply (RS)–Relative Demand (RD) analysis

The relative world price of cheese to wine in the free trade equilibrium
was argued to lie in between the autarky relative prices of the two
countries. The next issue we need to address is exactly how relative
world prices are determined. To do so, we need to use a piece of technical
apparatus emphasised in KO, the world Relative Supply (RS)–world
Relative Demand (RD) analysis.
The RS curve is derived from the production possibility curves of the
two countries and the condition that producers maximise profits. The RS
curve is step-shaped (see Figure 3.3 ‘World Relative Supply and Demand’
in KO) because the technology assumes fixed labour requirements.
The intersection of world RS and RD curves illustrates world trading
equilibrium. Two types of equilibria are possible:
1. An equilibrium in which both countries specialise (Equilibrium 1 in
Figure 3.3 of KO)
2. An equilibrium in which one of the countries is incompletely
specialised (such as Equilibrium 2 in Figure 3.3 of KO).

PC/
PW

RS
(PC/PW)H

(PC/PW)FT
E

(PC/PW)F

RD

RS, RD
0
Cheese/Wine

Figure 1.4: Determination of world relative prices using RD–RS

Consider Figure 1.4, which illustrates RS and RD for the Ricardian model.
RD is quite straightforward to grasp: as the relative price of cheese falls,
there is more demand for cheese relative to wine in the world.
The RS is a piece-wise function and needs careful construction. Consider
the incentives for production for different relative prices of cheese to wine.
If Pc/Pw < (Pc/Pw)F, then firms cannot cover the costs of cheese production,
so there will be no production of cheese in either country. Hence the RS is
vertical at 0 for all relative prices up to (Pc/Pw)F. If Pc/Pw = (Pc/Pw)F, only
country F can produce cheese, and can choose anywhere along its PPF,
giving a range of possible relative supplies of cheese to wine. For relative
prices in the range (Pc/Pw)F < Pc/Pw < (Pc/Pw)H, Foreign will produce
only cheese, while Home will produce only wine. This gives the vertical
segment of the RS step-function. Finally, for prices Pc/Pw > (Pc/Pw)H, there
is no incentive for either country to produce any wine, so the relative
supply of cheese to wine tends to infinity at (Pc/Pw)H.

18
 Chapter 1: The Ricardian model of international trade

Combining the steps in this reasoning yields the RS schedule in Figure 1.4.
The free trade equilibrium relative prices are determined where RS and
RD meet, such as point E in Figure 1.4.

Advantages of RS–RD approach:

 
trade.
  {' '
the effects of changes in input requirements – productivity); of changes
in size of country; of demand changes.
 %+'
Consider how world relative prices might be different if the Foreign
economy were very large in size (large labour force) relative to Home.
This could also reflect the case of an efficiency gain in labour productivity;
whereby the same labour force becomes uniformly more productive. The
PPF of the Foreign economy is further out than that depicted in Figure
1.2, so there is more scope for the production of cheese (and wine) than
before. It follows that the step-function changes, with a deeper ‘step’
reflecting larger Foreign production if Pc/Pw = (Pc/Pw)F. This is illustrated
in Figure 1.5. Country size and world relative prices, where an overall
gain in labour productivity in Foreign results in a change from free trade
equilibrium E to equilibrium E'.
The interesting result is that the free trade relative price coincides with the
autarky relative price of Foreign. Without a change in relative prices, there
is no CPF expansion in Foreign, which implies Foreign does not gain from
trade; by its sheer scale Foreign’s autarky prices prevail for the world once
trade is liberalised between Home and Foreign, with all the gains accruing
to Home.

PC/
PW

(PC/PW)H
RS RS'

(PC/PW)FT
E

(PC/PW)F E'


= (PC/PW)FT'
RD

RS, RD
0
Cheese/Wine

Figure 1.5: Country size and world relative prices

19
16 International economics

Activities
1. Work through Problems 1, 2 and 3 at the end of KO Chapter 3. Add a third
country with labour force 2,000 and labour input requirements of four and four
per unit for each of the two goods to Problem set 3. Construct the new RD curve.
2. Appendix 1 contains a Sample examination paper. Try Question 2 and then check
your results against the workings in Appendix 2.

Relative wages
The Ricardian model offers a clear insight into the way in which
international relative wages are influenced by relative productivity. This
can be seen most clearly in the case of complete specialisation. Assume
that Home specialises in wine and Foreign in cheese so that the price =
cost conditions imply:
Pw = aHw × wH (1.1)
and
Pc = aFC × wF (1.2)
where a w and a C are the labour input coefficients in Home for wine
H F

production and in Foreign for cheese production, respectively. wH and wF

are wages at Home and in Foreign. Taking the ratio of (1.1) to (1.2) and
rearranging to solve for relative wages yields:
w = a × Pw
H F
w

w a
F H
Pc
w
(1.3)

Thus equation (1.3) shows that in equilibrium, relative wages are linked
to relative productivities, through the ratio of input requirements, and to
product demand through the price ratio. Other things being equal, higher
productivity at Home (a lower unit labour requirement) implies higher
relative Home wages and a lower productivity implies lower wages. Thus
wages adjust to compensate for productivity in the Ricardian model. This
is what enables all countries to be competitive in something.

Empirical evidence and application

Testing
It is difficult to directly test the Ricardian model because its predictions
depend on properties of unobservable autarky equilibria or equivalently
upon the relative supply curve that is also unobservable. Attempts to
test the model have accordingly examined the way in which productivity
differences have influenced trade shares in third country markets. On the
whole such indirect evidence is supportive of the model (see KO, pp.48–50
‘Empirical evidence on the Ricardian Model’).

Revealed comparative advantage

At a very practical level it is sometimes helpful to see what inferences one
can make from a country’s trade data about its comparative advantage
and how it might have changed over time. A number of measures have
been proposed, but a particularly simple and relatively informative
measure is given by:

( Xi − M i ) (1.4)
RCA i =
( Xi + M i )

where Xi and Mi are exports and imports in the ith industry.

20
 Chapter 1: The Ricardian model of international trade

A reminder of your learning outcomes

On completion of this chapter and having done the relevant readings and
activities, you should be able to:
 +  
the idea of absolute advantage
 + 
of trade and specialisation in the Ricardian model
 + 
 +%
relative wages
 @X|@^ %<%
in the Ricardian model
 +  %
world situation.

Sample examination questions

1. Suppose that labour productivity in US agriculture is five times as high
as in Russia and in all other sectors is 10 times as high. This means
that it will not pay the USA to trade with Russia. (You must answer
true, false or uncertain and justify your answer in a few lines. An
unsupported answer would receive no marks.)
2. Show how the relative supply/relative demand (RS–RD) curve diagram
may be used to illustrate international equilibrium in the Ricardian
model. How would equilibrium change if the size of one of the
countries doubled but labour productivity halved?

Guidance on answering sample examination question 1

Firstly, the most important part of this kind of question is the justification
you offer rather than your choice of ‘true’, ‘false’ or ‘uncertain’. In this
question you are invited to look to theories of the pattern of international
trade and specialisation for your answer, in particular to the principle
of comparative advantage. The operative word here is comparative.
Comparative advantage means that trade patterns depend on relative
costs and relative prices and not on absolute levels of efficiency or
productivity. In the example of Question 1, Russia has a comparative
advantage in agriculture (can you show why?) and hence under the
conditions of the Ricardian model would export agricultural goods and
import other goods. Of course, trade might nevertheless not take place
because of other reasons (e.g. transport costs or trade barriers). So, either
false or uncertain would be acceptable answers.

21