Ds100/Geography 112: Development in Theory and History
Ds100/Geography 112: Development in Theory and History
Course Description
Is Development dead, as neoliberal and postmodernist critics proclaim? Neoliberals assert the superiority of
market forces over planned intervention. The ‘post-Development’ critique that arose in the mid-1990s
condemns post-World War II efforts to impose a Western model of progress on the Third World and demands
an end to Development. Instead they call for indigenous knowledge, organizing outside the state, and defence
of ‘the local’ against ‘the global.’ More recently, we have seen the emergence of revisionist forms of
(neo)liberalism that emphasize institutional reforms, civil society and social development, and are similarly
focused on ‘the local.’
This course argues that the convergence between the ‘new Right’ and the ‘new Left’ fails to come to grips with
the central challenge of contemporary development studies: How to understand the multiple, nonlinear,
interconnected paths of socio-spatial change in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East taking place
in the context of intensified global integration and capitalist development – and what these mean in terms of the
possibilities for social change, especially in the context of the meltdown of the global economy.
The course is organized in three parts. Part I distinguishes between ‘Development’ as a post-war international
project that emerged in the context of decolonization, and capitalist development as a dynamic and highly
uneven historical process of creation and destruction. The second part of the course traces the history of
Development as an international project. We examine how Development emerged from the process of
decolonization in the 1940s, and the ways in which theories and practices of Development have shifted over
time. Part III focuses on the so-called ‘era of globalization’ and the need to move beyond local/global
dichotomies in thinking about possibilities for progressive social change. Topics include land, labor and
livelihood struggles; race, gender, power; and social movements; and civil society and the future of the state.
Course Requirements
There are three sets of requirements for the course: (1) Three research essays on a country of the
student’s choice (55% of the grade). The essays will be geared to the topics covered in lectures, and
will build on one another. (2) Section participation (15% of the grade). (3) A final exam (30% of
the grade).
Reader
The reader for the course is available at University Copy, 2425 Channing.
Course Assignments
The assignments for the course are three essays (which together count for 55% of the grade), section
participation (15% of the grade) and a final exam (30 % of the grade). The essays are designed to
enable you to consider how the theories and debates that we discuss in class have played out in a
particular country.
The first step is to identify a country in Africa, Asia, Latin America, or the Middle East in which you
have a particular interest. The three essays will entail your doing background research and reading
on that country, and will be geared to the historical period and theoretical debates we are discussing
in class.
Essay # 1:
Handed out: 1/27 (Tues)
Due: 2/23 (Mon)
Length: 7-8 pages (double spaced, 12 point type)
15% of total grade
Essay # 2:
Handed out: 2/26 (Thurs)
Due: 3/27 (Fri)
Length: 8-10 pages (double spaced, 12 point type)
20% of total grade
Essay # 3:
Handed out: 3/31 (Tues)
Due: 4/20 (Mon)
Length: 8-10 pages (double spaced, 12 point type)
20% of total grade
Essay questions will be handed out in class. We will give instructions about where to turn them in.
Late essays will not be accepted, and the grade will be forfeited.
2
DS100/Geography 112: Course Outline
The 1950s & 1960s: Development Economics, Structuralism and Import Substitution
Industrialization (ISI)
The 1990s & Beyond: The Rise and Decline of the Washington Consensus
3
DS100/Geography 112: Reading List
* Available online.
§ In reader for Geography 214
All other readings are in the reader for DS100/Geography 112
Additional material posted on bSpace
1/20: Introduction
Background References:
*UK Department for International Development (DFID) (2005): Fighting Poverty to Build
a Safer World: A Strategy for Security & Development.
Related Readings:
*Deepak Lal The Poverty of Development Economics (2nd edition). (London: Institute for
Economic Affairs, 2002). (esp. postscript).
§Stuart Hall, ‘The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power’ in S. Hall et al (eds) Modernity
(Oxford: Blackwell, 1996): 185-227.
4
PART I
Theories of the Development of Capitalism
Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations (1776): Chapters 1-3; & The Theory of Moral
Sentiments (selected pages).
Related Readings:
§Emma Rothschild, ‘Adam Smith and Conservative Economics,’ Economic History Review
45:1 1992.
§David Harvey, ‘The Geography of the Manifesto,’ in Spaces of Hope (UC Press, 2000).
§Karl Marx, Wage, Labour and Capital: 203-217 in D. McClellan (ed) Karl Marx:
Selected Writings; and The German Ideology (Division of Labour: Town and Country): 68-
79.
Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation: Political and Economic Origins of Our Time
(Boston: Beacon Press, 1944; 2001 edition edited by Fred Block): esp. Chapters 3-10. (On
reserve in Earth Sciences library)
Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism [1916] : pp. 15-29; 99-128.
Related Readings:
§Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Empire: 1875-1914. (New York: Pantheon Books, 1987):
esp. Chapter 3.
5
2/12 - 2/17: State, Market, Civil Society: Gramsci & Polanyi
J. Femia, Gramsci’s Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987): pp.1-7.
A. Gramsci ‘Revolution against ‘Capital’ (1917) plus selected pages from Gramsci’s
Prison Notebooks (1971: orig. 1935]).
*Selections from the website of the Karl Polanyi Institute of Political Economy
(www.artsandscience.concordia.ca/polanyi/).
Related Readings:
§Stuart Hall (1995; orig. 1986) ‘Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity,’
in D. Morley and K. Chen (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies.
(London: Routledge).
*B. Silver and G. Arrighi. 2003. Polanyi’s ‘Double Movement’: The Belles Époques of
British and US Hegemony Compared. Politics and Society 31 (4): 325-55.
Frantz Fanon, “First Truths on the Colonial Problem,” in Toward the African
Revolution [orig. Pour la revolution Africaine, Maspero 1964].
Related Readings
§Robert Wood, From Marshall Plan to Debt Crisis: Foreign Aid and Development Choices
in the World Economy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986): pp. 21-93.
6
§ Eric Hobsbawm ‘The End of Empires’ from The Age of Extremes. (New York: Vintage,
1994)
PART II
Development as a Post-War International Project:
A History of Changing Theories and Practices
2/26 - 3/3: The 1950s and 1960s: Development Economics, Structuralism and Import Substitution
Industrialization (ISI)
Albert Hirschman, “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics,” in Essays in
Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1981): pp. 1-
24.
Harriet Friedmann, ‘The Political Economy of Food: The Rise and Fall of
the Postwar International Food Order,’ American Journal of Sociology (88) 1982: 248-286.
Related Readings:
*Sylvia Maxfield and John Nolt, ‘Protectionism and the Internationalization of Capital: US
Sponsorship of Import Substitution Industrialization in the Philippines, Turkey, and
Argentina,’ International Studies Quarterly (34) 1990: pp.49-81.
§George Rosen, Western Economists in Eastern Societies: Agents of Change in South Asia,
1950-1970. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985): Chapters 1,2 & 8.
Nils Gilman, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America.
(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004): Chapter 1.
Background Readings:
R. Rosenstein-Rodan, ‘Problems of Industrialization in Eastern and Southeastern
Europe,’ The Economic Journal 53, 1943: pp.202-211.
Henry Bernstein and Howard Nicholas, ‘Pessimism of the Intellect, Pessimism of the Will? A
Response to Gunder Frank,’ Development and Change vol. 14, 1983: pp.609-624.
Related Readings:
*J. Palma, ‘Dependency: A Formal Theory of Underdevelopment or a Methodology for the
Analysis of Concrete Situations of Underdevelopment,’ World Development 6, 1978:
pp.881-924.
*T. Dos Santos,‘The Structure of Dependence,’ American Economic Review 60:2, 1970:
231-6.
§Cardoso, F.H. and E. Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America.
Berkeley: University of California Press. Preface to the English Edition.
§Frederick Johnstone, ‘White Prosperity and White Supremacy in South Africa Today,’
African Affairs vol. 69, 1970: 124-140.
Robert McNamara, ‘Paupers of the World and How to Develop Them,’ (Excerpts from the
Address to the Board of Governors, World Bank, Nairobi 1973).
8
Robert Wood, ‘Basic Needs and the Limits of Regime Change,’ in From Marshall Aid to
Debt Crisis: Foreign Aid and Development Choices in the World Economy. Berkeley:
University of California Press: pp. 195-231.
Related Readings:
§Michael Goldman, ‘The Rise of the Bank,’ in Imperial Nature: The World Bank and
Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. (New Haven: Yale University
Press, 2005): pp. 46-99.
§Yves Dezalay & Bryant Garth, The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers,
Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2002): pp.73-94;141-152.
Background Readings:
Ester Boserup, Women’s Role in Economic Development. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.
Michael Lipton, Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development.
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).
3/12 - 3/19: The 1980s: The Neoliberal Counterrevolution & Structural Adjustment
Peter Gowan The Global Gamble (London: Verso Press, 1999): esp. pp. 8-12; 16-35; 41-
44;48-50.
William Canak, ‘Debt, Austerity, and Latin America in the New International Division of
Labor,’ in Lost Promises: Debt, Austerity, and Development in Latin America (Westview
Press, 1989): pp.9-29.
Lance Taylor, ‘The Revival of the Liberal Creed: the IMF and the World Bank in a
Globalized Economy,’ World Development 25 (2) 1997: 145-152.
Diane Elson ‘Male Bias in Structural Adjustment.’ In H. Afshar and C. Dennis Women and
Adjustment Policies in the Third World. (New York: St. Martin's Press): 46-68.
Thomas Biersteker, ‘Reducing the Role of the State in the Economy: A Conceptual
Exploration of IMF and World Bank Prescriptions,’ International Studies Quarterly 34 (4)
1991: pp. 477-492.
Related Readings:
§Michael Watts ‘Development II: The Privatization of Everything.’ Progress in Human
Geography 18(3), 1994: 371-384.
*William Easterly ‘The Lost Decades: Developing Countries’ Stagnation in Spite of Policy
Reform 1980-1998’ Journal of Economic Growth 6 (2001): 135-57.
3/31 – 4/2: The 1990s & Beyond: The Rise and Decline of the Washington Consensus
Jeffrey Williamson, ‘Democracy and the Washington Consensus,’ World Development 21(8),
9
1993:1329-36.
Gillian Hart, ‘Development Critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths,’
Progress in Human Geography 24 (4) 2001: 649-658.
Robert Wade, ‘Greening the Bank: The Struggle over the Environment, 1979-1995,’ in D.
Kapur (ed) The World Bank: Its first Half Century (Washington: Brookings Institution Press,
1997): pp. 611-614; 729-734.
Ismail Serageldin Sustainability and the Wealth of Nations: First Steps in on Ongoing
Journey. Washington: The World Bank Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies
and Monograph Series, No. 5: 1996.
Re-read Mohan & Stokke (2000) & Escobar (1995b) (from Part I).
Related Readings:
*Michael Hudson & Jeffrey Sommers ‘The End of the Washington Consensus’
Counterpunch Dec. 12/14, 2008.
§Doug Porter & David Craig (2006) Development Beyond Neoliberalism? Governance,
Poverty Reduction & Political Economy. (London: Routledge): Chapters 1 & 9.
*Charles Gore (2000). ‘The Rise and Fall of Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for
Developing Countries.’ World Development 28(5): 789-804.
§Michael Goldman (2005). Imperial Nature: The World Bank & Struggles for Social
Justice in the Age of Globalization. (New Haven: Yale University Press): Chapter 4.
Part III
Beyond Local/Global Dichotomies: Space, Place, Power, & Difference
(Preliminary: to be revised)
10
Massey, D. (1994). “A Global Sense of Place,” in Space, Place and Gender.
Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press: 146-156 & “The Geography of Power,”
unpublished paper.
Pithouse, R. “The Necessity, Promises and Pitfalls of Global Linkages for South
African Movements,” in Gibson, N. (ed) (2006) Challenging Hegemony: Social
Movements and the Quest for a New Humanism in Post-Apartheid South Africa.
Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
11