Ultrahigh Porosity in Metal-Organic Frameworks: 'Keeffe
Ultrahigh Porosity in Metal-Organic Frameworks: 'Keeffe
locations (~6300 km on a great circle) imply 14. D. W. Ming et al., J. Geophys. Res. 111, E02S12 (2006). 36. A. H. Treiman et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 204, 323
that such environments have multiple occurrences 15. T. J. McCoy et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, E06S03 (2008). (2002).
16. R. E. Arvidson et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, E12S33 37. A. Steele et al., Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 42, 1549
in Noachian terrain. The high carbonate con- (2008). (2007).
centration in the Comanche outcrops is evidence 17. S. W. Squyres et al., Science 316, 738 (2007). 38. L. E. Borg et al., Science 286, 90 (1999).
for climate models (3) involving a CO2 green- 18. S. W. Squyres et al., Science 320, 1063 (2008). 39. D. Banks et al., Geothermics 28, 713 (1999).
house gas on a wet and warm early Mars and 19. R. V. Morris et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, E12S42 40. H. E. F. Amundsen, W. L. Griffin, S. Y. O’Reilly,
(2008). Tectonophysics 139, 169 (1987).
subsequent sequestering of at least part of that 20. A. S. Yen et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, E06S10 (2008). 41. R.V.M. and D.W.M. acknowledge the NASA Johnson Space
atmosphere in carbonate minerals. 21. D. W. Ming et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, E12S39 (2008). Center and the NASA Mars Exploration Program for
22. G. Klingelhöfer et al., J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8067 (2003). support. R.V.M. acknowledges the NASA Ames
References and Notes 23. Supporting material available on Science Online includes Astrobiology Institute for support. S.W.R. acknowledges
1. J. L. Gooding, Icarus 33, 483 (1978). laboratory studies, spectral unmixing of Mini-TES spectra, the NASA Mars Data Analysis Program for support. G.K.
2. J. L. Gooding, in The Solar System: Observations and and Pancam multispectral spectroscopy. and I.F. acknowledge support by the German Space
Interpretations, Rubey Volume IV, M. G. Kivelson, Ed. 24. R. Rieder et al., J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8066 (2003). Agency DLR under contract 50QM9902. A portion of
(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1986), 25. J. L. Campbell et al., J. Geophys. Res. 113, E06S11 the research described in this paper was carried out at
pp. 208–229. (2008). the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
3. J. B. Pollack, J. F. Kasting, S. M. Richardson, K. Poliakoff, 26. P. R. Christensen et al., J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8064 Technology, under a contract with NASA. We thank
Icarus 71, 203 (1987). (2003). P. B. Niles for carbonate samples, L. Le for carbonate
4. D. C. Catling, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 16453 (1999). 27. M. S. Ramsey, P. R. Christensen, J. Geophys. Res. 103, microprobe analyses, and J. L. Campbell for calculation of
5. J. C. Bridges et al., Space Sci. Rev. 96, 365 (2001). 577 (1998). excess light-element concentrations from APXS data.
6. B. L. Ehlmann et al., Science 322, 1828 (2008). 28. D. W. Mittlefehldt, Meteoritics 29, 214 (1994).
7. J. L. Bandfield, T. D. Glotch, P. R. Christensen, Science 29. A. H. Treiman, Meteoritics 30, 294 (1995). Supporting Online Material
301, 1084 (2003). 30. R. P. Harvey, H. Y. McSween Jr., Nature 382, 49 www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.1189667/DC1
8. M. D. Lane, M. D. Dyar, J. L. Bishop, Geophys. Res. Lett. (1996). SOM Text
31, L19702 (2004). 31. S. J. Gaffey, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 1429 (1987). Figs. S1 and S2
9. V. E. Hamilton, H. Y. McSween Jr., B. Hapke, J. Geophys. 32. T. M. Hoefen et al., Science 302, 627 (2003).
has led to many applications concerned with gas frameworks (9), and (ii) the large void space 1
Center for Reticular Chemistry at the California NanoSystems
storage, separations, and catalysis (1–6). An im- within the crystal framework makes it generally Institute, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Uni-
portant consideration in maximizing the uptake susceptible to self-interpenetration (two lattices versity of California Los Angeles (UCLA), 607 Charles E. Young
of gases within porous MOF crystals is to grow and interpenetrate each other), precluding Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 2Department of Chem-
increase the number of adsorptive sites within a high porosity (10, 11). In this report, we present istry, Soongsil University, Seoul 156-743, Korea. 3Department
given material. The simplest way to accomplish four examples of MOFs for which it was possible to of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern Uni-
versity, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. 4UCLA–Department of En-
this is to use slim organic linkers in which the overcome the two challenges and to obtain ma- ergy (DOE) Institute of Genomics and Proteomics, UCLA, 607
faces and edges of the constituent units (such as terials with the highest porosity yet achieved. Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
phenylene rings) are exposed for gas adsorp- Specifically, the synthesis and crystal structures *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
tion (7, 8). Thus in principle, expansion of the of the four MOFs (MOF-180, -200, -205, and [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (O.M.Y.)
2000
isotherm for MOF-205 is saturated at a pressure
MOF-200 (simulated)
MOF-210 (simulated)
60 of 37 bar, whereas the saturation pressure for MOF-
1500 200 and -210 are ~50 bar. In contrast to hydrogen
40 MOF-210 and methane uptakes, the amounts of excess CO2
1000 MOF-200
MOF-200 MOF-177
MOF-205 uptake are directly related to the total pore volume.
The CO2 uptake value of 2400 mg g−1 in both
20 MOF-177
500 MOF-210 MOF-5
MOF-5 (14)
MOF-205
MOF-5
0 0 MOF-200 and -210 exceeds those of any other po-
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 20 40 60 80 rous material, such as MOF-177 and MIL-101c(Cr)
P/P0 Pressure / bar
(1470 and 1760 mg g−1, respectively) (24).
C 300 D 3000
The ultrahigh surface areas exhibited by
CH4, 298 K CO2, 298 K
250 2500 MOF-200 and -210 are near the ultimate limit for
CO2 uptake (mg g-1)
CH4 uptake (mg g-1)
MOF-200
MOF-210 solid materials. To appreciate this, it is useful to
200 2000 MOF-205
MOF-177 note that all these compounds have a volume-
MOF-5
150 1500 specific surface area in the range of 1000 to 2000
MOF-210
m2 cm−3 = 1 × 109 to 2 × 109 m−1, and for a
100 1000
MOF-205
MOF-177
cube of edge d the external surface area/volume
50 MOF-200 500 is 6d2/d3 = 6/d. Thus, for a monodisperse powder
MOF-5
of cubic nanoparticles to have external surface that
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 is equal to that of these MOFs the cube edge
Pressure / bar Pressure / bar would have to be only 3 to 6 nm, which is a size
Fig. 3. (A) Low-pressure N2 isotherms of MOF-5, -177, -200, -205, and -210 at 77 K. Simulated far too small to practically realize in stable dry
isotherms of MOF-200 and -210 were overlaid. P/P0, relative pressure. High-pressure H2 isotherms were powders and therefore impossible to access the full
measured at 77 K (B), and (C) CH4 and (D) CO2 isotherms were measured at 298 K of the same MOFs. surface area of such particles. This analysis
SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2010/06/28/science.1192160.DC1
MATERIALS
REFERENCES This article cites 27 articles, 5 of which you can access for free
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5990/424#BIBL
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. 2017 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive
licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. The title
Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.