Housing As A Challenge For The Ageing Population: The Case of Poland
Housing As A Challenge For The Ageing Population: The Case of Poland
Housing as a
Challenge for the Ageing Population: The Case of Poland. In Ł. Tomczyk &
A. Klimczuk (Eds.), Between Successful and Unsuccessful Ageing: Selected
Aspects and Contexts (59–78). Kraków: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w
Krakowie. DOI: 10.24917/9788395373718.3
AGNIESZKA CIEŚLA1
JAN P. CIEŚLA2
1
Agnieszka Cieśla, Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of
Geodesy and Cartography, Poland, [email protected]
2
Jan P. Cieśla, “Despite the Age” Foundation, Poland,
[email protected]
Key words: Age-friendly Housing, Seniors’ Needs, Central
and Eastern Europe, Socialism, Housing Stock
Introduction
The primary goal of this chapter is to discuss the role of
housing in the ageing population, on the example of Poland.
Undoubtedly, the maladjusted to the older people needs
housing poses a great challenge for the Central and Eastern
Europe (CEE) where the intensity of the ageing process is
particularly pronounced. Poland is no exception in this group,
and the country has one of the fastest ageing population in the
world. Housing poses one of the keystones of the Age-
Friendly Cities concept introduced by the World Health
Organisation (WHO) in 2007 (WHO, 2007), what indicates its
importance in keeping people active, healthy and independent
throughout the life course.
In the first part of this chapter, attention is given to the
process of ageing taking place in the CEE area. The values are
being presented not only in relation to the overall population
but also to its oldest part, aged 85+. The growth of this
population group is forecasted to be particularly significant in
Poland, and this poses a particular challenge for proper
housing, well suited to the needs of the oldest group of people.
In the second part, dwelling environment for seniors
as a critical economic factor is discussed. It is pointed out that
poor housing conditions older people live in contribute to vast
financial expenses caused by the need for medical care
resulting from accidents taking place in maladjusted
dwellings. Poorly accessible dwellings contribute to social
isolation that in turn, may result in mental disorders. The
location of older people dwellings in scattered, peripheral
areas also leads to alienation and makes the job of social
workers less effective. However, above all, proper housing
condition may keep a person active and healthy for a much
longer time. Thanks to proper housing, seniors may keep
60
working and thus may contribute to the economic prosperity of
the country.
The third part is focused on housing stock
development in Poland. The majority of the housing stock in
Poland was created in socialism, when Poland, as well as in
other CEE countries, experienced very intense urbanization
and industrialization process. This has significant
repercussions today. The majority of the seniors in Poland live
in prefabricated housing stock created in socialism. These
dwellings are hardly adaptable, though several amendments
can be introduced. Equally important is the environment, in
which this dwelling is located. In socialism, the estates were
designed with a young population in mind. Today many
kindergartens or schools are obsolete and could be
transformed into other function better suited for the ageing
population needs.
The subsequent part concentrates on the question:
What is a senior-friendly apartment? Based on the outcomes of
the project of the first model apartment for seniors in Poland
done by the chapter’s authors, the features of such a dwelling
are presented. The initiative is being described in detail in the
sixth part. It is worth mentioning that it is a bottom-up, purely
private initiative where no public support was involved so far.
It is a civic response to the currently observed accelerated
process of ageing in Poland. The project had found a vivid
response in the press and contributed mainly to a growing
awareness of the age-friendly housing in Poland.
Finally, outlook and potential solutions are being
presented. It is pointed out that in Poland, in-depth studies on
housing conditions of seniors are needed and that cities should
also make such analysis on a local level. Apart from that, the
state should introduce technical standards regarding new
housing stock according to which age-friendly dwellings
would be built. The investors, both public and private, should
be obliged to create such dwellings and economic incentives
61
for adoption of existing housing stock to age-friendly standard
should be introduced. However, above all, the education of
seniors, their relatives, architects, and policymakers on age-
friendly housing should become a priority.
62
ones. This process was very well described by the World Bank
report with a meaningful title “From Red to Grey” (World
Bank, 2007). It was pointed out that post-socialist and post-
communist countries underwent not only the system transition
at the turn of the 1980s but also experienced an accelerated
process of demographic change. This process can be linked
with very hard economic conditions that arose in the 1990s,
which resulted in decreasing birthrate and outmigration of the
young to the west that further negatively influenced the natural
increase.
However, not only lowering birthrate contributed to
the accelerated process of ageing. Another crucial factor was a
growing life expectancy, which is going to grow in the coming
decades as well. It will certainly result in the increase of the
“oldest old” group of seniors (85+) in the CEE. This increase
will be higher than the expected one for the Western countries,
and it can be well illustrated by the comparison of the situation
in Poland, France, and Germany—the largest and neighboring
countries in Central Europe (Table 1). The percentage of
people aged 85+ in Poland is going to grow until 2060 by
more than 3.8 times, while in France this growth will amount
to 2.3 and in Germany 2.8 times.
63
Dwelling Environment of Seniors as a Critical Economic
Factor
Proper housing conditions are a predominant factor for a
successful and happy life on every life stage. However, in the
old age, housing becomes particularly important because, with
age, people tend to spend increased time in their dwellings
(even 80-90%). It is the place where app. 47% of non-fatal
injuries among older people (60+) in the European Union
occurs (EuroSafe, 2013, p. 16). The economic and societal
costs for the consequences of poor design or construction of
homes for older people are very high in Europe. In the United
Kingdom (UK) the total cost to the national health service
resulting from various incidents in unhealthy housing older
people live in is estimated to 1.7 billion Euro per year (Garett
& Burris, 2015). These are the costs only relating to the health
service, and they represent only a fraction of the total costs to
society that could be significantly reduced if senior-friendly
housing was available.
It has to be noted that real cost resulting from poor
dwelling condition are likely to be significantly larger than
those directly linked and quantified. The non-accessible
character of the flats, poor indoor environment quality causing
low physical activity induce gradual but the increased
deterioration of health. The inability to move to and from a
dwelling result not only in physical isolation of seniors but
also significantly contributes to social exclusion and mental
disorders.
Poor dwelling conditions can not only be a reason for
increased health care costs associated with injuries and
illnesses but contribute to lowering the age when seniors are
no longer in position to live independent and rely on social
care. In Poland, due to lower health level of older people than
in the west, the age at which a person starts to need assistance
or needs to move to a nursing home is already 75-80 years
(Błędowski, Szatur-Jaworska, Szweda-Lewandowska, &
64
Kubicki, 2012) whereas in Western Europe it is 85. Nursing
homes regardless of their standard, are more cost-intensive
than independent or semi-independent living. Therefore,
support of age-friendly housing should be seen as a way to
minimize increased expenses in health and social care.
Not only the conditions offered by the dwellings
themselves but also their spatial distribution in the urban
structure has an impact on the costs connected with health and
social care on seniors. Scattered, often located in areas of poor
social infrastructure and services, these dwellings generate
extra effort for social workers. It is more money and time
spent on travels and making provisions than practical work
focused on social and physical activation of the seniors.
Finally, the economic influence of ageing populations
should not only be seen through costs. Active and healthy
seniors can contribute to the economy instead of being seen as
a burden for the system. Although seniors are usually
associated with persons who are not professionally active
anymore, one cannot deny the influence of seniors on the job
market. The share of people over 50 on the job market is prone
to increase, and already in many companies, they belong to a
valued core of the staff. Having said that dwelling conditions
and life satisfaction contribute to work productivity, one
should see the senior-friendly housing stock as another
economic factor.
The abrupt demographic change in the CEE will bring
many challenges, among which the adoption of the housing
conditions to the needs of older adults seems to be most
pronounced. Although many Western European experiences
might be very valuable and useful, the countries of the CEE
area need to develop their own responses to maladjusted
housing older people live. It is caused by the differences in
housing stock between these two European regions.
65
Housing Stock Development in Poland and Senior
Dwellings
Older generations of Polish society have a rather low mobility
rate. Surveys conducted among Polish seniors (Cieśla, Cieśla,
& Iwański, 2018) indicate a high percentage of old people
dwellings in prefabricated multifamily buildings dating from
socialist times. This may indicate that those persons moved
into their apartments when they were young and never
changed them later.
In 1950 the CEE region was overwhelmingly rural:
the share of the rural population was over 80% in Bulgaria and
Yugoslavia, over 70% in Romania and Poland, and 60% in
Hungary (Enyedi, 1996, p. 109). These shares were very high
in comparison to Western Europe, where less than 30% of the
population lived in rural areas. Therefore, one of the primary
objectives of socialist planning was to catch up with the West
in terms of industrial and urban development. Indeed,
industrialization and urbanization process was very intense
during 44 years of the socialist period. Nowadays, the shares
of urban populations in post-socialist countries are comparable
with those in the West. However, there are substantial
differences in the city network structure (people are more
concentrated in medium-sized cities) and in the housing stock
structure.
In Poland in period 1946-1988 urban population
tripled—it grew by 15.7 million, from 7.5 in 1946 to 23.2
million 1988 (own calculation based on census data derived
from the Central Statistical Office of Poland). This immense
growth required an intensive housing construction. According
to the data of the Central Statistical Office of Poland, in period
1945-1988 over 7.5 million flats were built in Poland, most of
which are in prefabricated, multi-store buildings. Nowadays,
these buildings form a large part of the housing stock in Polish
cities. It must be noted, however, that despite high
construction rates housing shortage existed throughout the
66
socialism and it remains on a high level. For this reason, the
current National Housing Program envisages building 2.5
million flats until 2030 (MIIR, 2016).
Cities in socialism were planned with a young
population in mind. Mostly young people were migrating from
the rural areas, and this migration was described as a social
promotion. The cities were enlarged by prefabricated estates
(in the Soviet Union and Romania called micro districts or
micro rayon, in the German Democratic Republic (GDR)
“Großwohnsiedlungen” and in Poland “osiedla
mieszkaniowe”). These structures included the multi-store
apartment’s buildings, social infrastructure, and services. They
were designed to host several thousand inhabitants. The
average size of the estate amounted to 10 000 inhabitants;
however, some were much more populous. The largest Polish
estate, Ursynów in Warsaw was planned for 140 000 people.
This part of Warsaw is ageing now the fastest compared to
other city districts (Cieśla & Iwański, 2017).
Even though many facilities such as schools and
kindergartens located at the socialist housing estates are
becoming obsolete so far, no discussion has been raised on the
methods of adapting them to the needs of the ageing
inhabitants. Dwellings and buildings also require adaptions,
but these are hard to be done since prefabricated systems
construction does not allow for significant changes at low cost.
Overall, Poland witnesses high deficiencies in housing
dedicated to older residents both in existing stock and the new
one. On the state level, the National Housing Program
acknowledges the need in creating flats for older people.
However, it concentrates its measures on flats for the young
people as it is hoped that by improving their housing
conditions also the birthrate will increase. Apart from the
state-level housing policy is also led on a local level.
Unfortunately, only few cities take measures aimed at creating
housing for older people. Worth mentioning are the actions are
67
taken in Szczecin, Stargard, Poznań, and Ostrów
Wielkopolski.
While a closer look into the urbanization process in
the CEE region with regard to senior dwelling conditions is
needed, the above observation allows for a conclusion that
different housing stock adaption strategies should be created in
different countries. In Poland, the most critical type of
dwelling seems to be the prefabricated blocks of flats.
68
2019). Gender of dwelling users seems to be a crucial factor to
take into account.
Seniors in Poland live in their dwellings as singles or
couples. The larger, multigeneration model is getting less and
less popular, represented at present by only a fraction of
households. This is followed by the fact that loneliness is
being increasingly reported as an issue bothering the singles.
Depression is often the consequence of loneliness and
isolation. According to the PolSenior survey, the risk of
depression among Polish seniors increases with age, and it was
reported that in the age group 55-59 1/5 of persons had
depression, 65-79 1/4 and in the group with more than 80
years 1/3 (Mossakowska, Więcek, & Błędowski, 2012). The
dwelling, therefore, should provide not only retreat but also
the potential for easy reaching out to other community
members.
There seems to be a considerable discrepancy in the
needed and actual size of seniors’ dwelling s in Poland. Only
20% of the surveyed seniors live in 40-60m² the size best
suited for singles and couples. Big dwellings (houses or
apartments) cause significantly increased maintenance costs,
whereas smaller dwelling does not allow for the accessible and
safe arrangement. About half of the surveyed seniors live in
multistory buildings without an elevator, and the majority of
the dwellings are situated in buildings from the socialist era
(Cieśla, Cieśla, & Iwański, 2018).
Although the above depicts the current dwelling
environment of seniors as rather discouraging vast majority is
against changing their place of residence. This also due to the
existing social connections, or merely a sentiment. The most
open for a change of address are characteristically those who
dwell in social housing projects what indicates especially low
satisfaction in this type of dwellings.
69
What Is a Senior-Friendly Apartment?
Whereas the importance, high demand for senior-friendly
apartments cannot be denied it remains an open question what
defines such a dwelling. In broad terms, such an apartment
should provide optimal living conditions for a person with
limitations associated with advanced age to enable
independent and active and satisfying live style. The authors
of the first model apartment for seniors in Poland stress the
importance of three key features: safety, comfort, and ease of
maintenance (Cieśla & Cieśla, 2018). These translate into
various issues.
Safety should be provided by reducing the risk of
common injuries. This is fostered by the barrier-free character
of the interior with particular regard to bathroom and kitchen
and a set of special aids such as railings. Importantly, thanks to
the flexible arrangement on preinstalled fixing points, the
safety increasing equipment can be gradually added according
to the raising needs of the user.
Comfort has multiple dimensions, among which air
quality, thermal comfort, and acoustics play a significant role.
Taking into account that seniors are much more sensitive to all
disruptors and illness triggering factors, a senior-friendly
apartment should be distinguished by elevated standards in all
of the mentioned aspects. This does not necessarily result in
significant cost increase if taken into account before
construction.
Ease of maintenance has its financial and purely
physical dimension. Above all, a rightly chosen size of the
dwellings allows for optimization in both. Apartments with the
size of 40-60 m² usually do not have excessive costs in terms
of utilities and are easy clean if adequately furnished and
equipped with easy cleanable surfaces. A senior-friendly
apartment should also be easily upgraded with telecoms and
other infrastructure allowing easier access to services and if
so, becoming a serviced apartment.
70
Problem Awareness and Education Efforts
Although the ageing poses significant challenges both on an
individual and national scale, there has been little done about
it. The reason for it might have been a still low level of
problem and insufficient knowledge of available solutions
(Klimczuk & Tomczyk, 2016). Private home buyers or
decisionmakers responsible for public housing stock seem to
underestimate the importance of senior-friendly dwellings.
This is gradually changing, thanks to both public sectors led
and bottom-up initiatives.
The Polish government has launched a multisector
program called “Accessibility Plus” (pol. “Dostępność Plus”)
the aim of which is to increase the general availability of the
built environment, equipment, and services to people with
disabilities including seniors (MIIR, 2018). The program calls
for improvements in law regulations and policies and fosters
the dissemination of good practice. Additionally, the National
Institute of Public Health in Poland has launched a campaign
in media, and a series of events on ageing and connected
challenges and solutions implemented followed by a
publication of education brochure titled “Features of a safe
dwelling for seniors” (Cieśla & Cieśla, 2018).
Local authorities start to realize the problem of the
ageing population. In 2007 WHO published a guide on age-
friendly cities, which comprised eight different domains
referring to the city life (WHO, 2007). Based on that in 2010 a
global network of age-friendly cities was launched, which
initially had 33 cities, but in the year 2018, their number
exceeded 700, 7 of them in Poland (WHO, 2018).
Poland has a network of Third Age Universities with
first institutions dating back to 1975; however, most of them in
operation since 2010 or younger. Some of those institutions
established to keep the seniors active introduce the subject of a
71
healthy lifestyle with regard to dwellings, such as education on
injury prevention.
A relatively new and innovative platform for
education, training, and best practice exchange is a model
apartment for seniors in Warsaw. This private, bottom-up an
initiative called “At Home Despite the Age” (pol. “U Siebie
Mimo Wieku”) (Mimo wieku, 2019) aims to present a
technically feasible complete solution to most of the problems
of seniors in apartments. It should be mentioned that the
design takes into account the economic factors of the Polish
real estate market.
72
The first model apartment for seniors was opened in
Poland in September 2016. It is located in Warsaw, close to a
subway station Wawrzyszew. Unlike other Western examples
of this kind, it is an entirely private and bottom-up initiative.
Its authors (Agnieszka Cieśla and Jan Cieśla) managed to
invite 18 companies all together to a dwelling, which was lent
for this purpose by their relatives. During two years of
existence, it was visited by over 2300 persons, who
represented various groups: seniors, their carers but also
architects, social activists and representatives of developers
interested in creating this kind of dwellings. It is worth
mentioning that the apartment was also visited by the
representatives of the Ministry of Investment and Economic
Development as well as the Ministry of Family, Labour, and
Social Policy. Apart from visits and training, the authors were
also busy with publicizing about their initiative. The press and
others were keen to show this development as a spectacular
and positive example of potential countermeasures to
challenges connected with the ageing population on both
national and individual scale.
73
encouraged to carry out such surveys in cooperation with
scientific institutions. It is essential for the cities to properly
measure the housing needs of the seniors as this has significant
implications on spatial planning. Unfortunately, so far surveys
on older people needs regarding housing in Poland are
missing. As a consequence, the potential investors (both
private and public) disregard older people as potential
customers of their investments.
Such studies would also trigger a very much needed
discussion on how citizens want to live in the old age. Such a
discussion has never taken place in Poland, perhaps due to the
fact that so far, the majority of the older persons lived with
their relatives and were cared for by them. This changes
nowadays abruptly. The caring potential of Polish families is
rapidly diminishing due to the outmigration of more than 2
million young people after accession to the European Union in
2004. As a consequence, new models of senior housing should
appear.
Apart from that, the state should introduce elevated
technical standards regarding new housing stock. It is crucial
because particularly in the new housing age-friendly dwellings
can be created at low costs in comparison to expensive
modernization of existing housing stock. The investors should
not only be incentivized to carry out such investments, but
they should also be obliged to create a certain number of age-
friendly dwelling in each investment. Such a solution is
already in place in Germany.
The modernization of the existing housing stock and
creating in this way more age-friendly dwellings is also
significant, due to the fact that as shown above the majority of
the seniors in Poland live in prefabricated housing dating back
to socialism. The local government can carry out some
measures such as co-financing of the bathroom modernization
(the case of Poznań) in reference to communal housing. For
private persons owning their flats, banks should provide
74
financial support in the form of flex. Reversed mortgage with
which they could finance the necessary amendments in their
flats.
Above all, education of end-users and policymakers is
needed. It is vital to talk about ageing and housing needs in the
old age also with the young people in order not only to
sensitize them to the needs of seniors but also to make them
aware of their future needs.
So far, Poland has not witnessed efficient, coordinated
programs aimed at increasing the availability of senior-
friendly dwellings. Taking into account the relatively weak
and deteriorated public housing stock and rather a modest
production in the public sector it is the private developers and
individuals shaping their demand who may change the
situation.
References
Andrusz, G. (1996). Structural Change and Boundary Instability.
In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities
after Socialism. Urban and Regional Change and
conflict in Post-Socialist Societies (pp. 30–69). Oxford,
UK, Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Błędowski, P., Szatur-Jaworska, B., Szweda-Lewandowska, Z.,
& Kubicki, P. (2012). Raport na temat sytuacji osób
starszych w Polsce [Report on the situation of older
people in Poland]. Warszawa: Instytut Pracy i Spraw
Socjalnych. Retrieved from
http://senior.gov.pl/source/raport_osoby%20starsze.pdf
Cieśla, A., & Cieśla, J. (2018). Cechy Bezpiecznego Mieszkania
Seniora [Features of the senior's dwelling]. Warszawa:
Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego. Retrieved from
https://www.pzh.gov.pl/wp-
content/uploads/2018/11/Cechy-bezpiecznego-
mieszkania-seniora.pdf
Cieśla, A., & Iwański, R. (2017). Wyzwanie dla Warszawy -
mieszkalnictwo dla seniorów [Challenge for Warsaw:
75
dwellings for seniors]. Warszawa: Fundacja Go Silver.
Retrieved from http://gosilver.org.pl/strona-
glowna/nasze-projekty/wyzwanie-dla-warszawy-
mieszkalnictwo-dla-seniorow/
Cieśla, A., Cieśla, J., & Iwański, R. (2018). Mieszkania seniorów
w Polsce [Older people dwellings in Poland]. In A.
Muzioł-Węcławowicz & K. Nowak, Raport o stanie
polskich miast: Mieszkalnictwo Społeczne [Report on the
state of the Polish cities: public housing) (pp. 158–178).
Kraków: Obserwatorium Polityki Miejskiej. Retrieved
from http://obserwatorium.miasta.pl/mieszkalnictwo-
spoleczne-raport-o-stanie-polskich-miast/
Enyedi, G. (1996). Urbanization under Socialism. In G. Andrusz,
M. Harloe, & I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities after Socialism:
Urban and Regional Change and conflict in Post-
Socialist Societies (pp. 100–118). Oxford, UK,
Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
EuroSafe. (2013). Injuries in the European Union: Summary of
injury statistics for the years 2008-2010. Amsterdam:
EuroSafe.
Eurostat (2019). Life expectancy at birth by sex. Retrieved from
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_03_1
0/default/table?lang=en
Garett, H., & Burris, S. (2015). Homes and ageing in England:
Briefing paper. Watford: Building Research
Establishment Trust.
Klimczuk, A., & Tomczyk, Ł. (2016). Smart, Age-friendly Cities
and Communities: the Emergence of Socio-technological
Solutions in the Central and Eastern Europe. In F.
Flórez-Revuelta & A.A. Chaaraoui, Active and Assisted
Living: Technologies and Applications (pp. 335–359).
London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
MIIR (Ministry of Investment and Economic Development).
(2016). Narodowy Program Mieszkaniowy [National
Housing Program]. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Inwestycji i
Rozwoju.
76
MIIR (Ministry of Investment and Economic Development).
(2018). Program rządowy Dostępność Plus 2018-2025
[Government program Accessibility Plus 2018-2025].
Warszawa: Ministerstwo Inwestycji i Rozwoju.
Mimo wieku. (2019). Mimo wieku [At Home Despite the Age].
Retrieved from www.mimowieku.pl
Mossakowska, M., Więcek, A., & Błędowski, P. (2012).
PolSenior. Aspekty medyczne, psychologiczne,
socjologiczne i ekonomiczne starzenia się ludzi w Polsce
[PolSenior: Medical, psychological, sociological and
economic aspects of peoples ageing in Poland].
Warszawa: Międzynarodowy Instytut Biologii
Molekularnej i Komórkowej w Warszawie; Termedia.
Retrieved from http://gerontologia.org.pl/wp-
content/uploads/pliki/ol/polsenior.pdf
Sollami, A., Gianferrari, E., Alfieri, M., Artioli, G., & Taffurelli,
C. (2017). Pet therapy: an effective strategy to care for
the elderly? An experimental study in a nursing home.
Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis, 88(1-S), 25–31.
statista.com. (2019). statista.com. Retrieved from
https://www.statista.com/
Śleszyński, P. (2016). Delimitacja miast średnich tracącyh
funkcje społeczno gospodarcze [Delimitation of medium
sized cities losing socio-economic functions]. Warszawa:
Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania
PAN.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2007). Global Age-friendly
Cities: A Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_frie
ndly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
WHO (World Health Organization) (2018). Age-friendly World:
Browse the Network. Retrieved from
https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/network/
WHO (World Health Organization) Regional Office for Europe.
(2012). Strategy and action plan for healthy ageing in
Europe 2012–2020. Malta: WHO Regional Committee
77
for Europe. Retrieved from
http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/175
544/RC62wd10Rev1-Eng.pdf?ua=1
World Bank. (2007). From Red to Grey. Washington, DC: The
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Retrieved from
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ECAEXT/Resources/
publications/454763-1181939083693/full_report.pdf
78